Re-exploration For Bleeding Research Articles

Perioperative Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and to assess the impact of CABG on mortality and complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1198 ATAAD patients who underwent surgical treatment at our center between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into CABG and non-CABG groups. Preoperative characteristics, surgical data, and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent surgical treatment in this study, of whom 979 (81.7%) were male. The mean age was 51.7 ± 11.5 years. Among these patients, 91 (7.6%) underwent concomitant CABG. Patients in the CABG group had significantly higher incidences of chronic coronary artery disease (58.2% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (59.3% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001), and neurological events (28.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.016) compared to the non-CABG group before surgery. Among all patients who underwent surgical treatment, 96 (8.0%) experienced perioperative death. The perioperative mortality rate was significantly higher in the CABG group (39.6% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001). Patients in the CABG group also had higher rates of postoperative complications, including heart failure, neurological events, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), re-exploration for bleeding, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support (all p-values < 0.001). Compared to patients without concomitant CABG, those undergoing CABG had a much higher rate of mortality (Odds Ratio = 2.729, 95% CI = 1.282–5.812, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Concomitant CABG in ATAAD patients was significantly associated with higher perioperative mortality and complication rates.

Preoperative Hematocrit Is Not Associated With Stroke After Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

To determine the impact of hematocrit on adverse neurologic events after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Retrospective study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2021. Single institution. Patients undergoing open ATAAD repairs, excluding those with preoperative cerebral malperfusion syndrome (defined as neurologic deficit with radiographic evidence of cerebral branch vessel malperfusion). Patients were split into three groups: normal, low, and high hematocrit. A total of 527 patients were included, of which 355 (67.3%) had normal hematocrit, 143 (27.1%) had low hematocrit, and 29 (5.5%) had high hematocrit. Overall, 20 (3.8%) patients had a postoperative stroke, which was comparable across groups (p = 0.59). Patients with normal hematocrit had lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.02) and lower transfusion rates (p < 0.001), while re-exploration for bleeding was similar across groups (p = 0.68). After multivariable adjustment, there was no association between hematocrit and postoperative stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.00, p = 0.79). Compared with normal hematocrit, there was no association between low hematocrit (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.77, 3.28, p = 0.21) or high hematocrit (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 0.74, 8.29, p = 0.14) and in-hospital mortality. Preoperative hematocrit was not associated with stroke or mortality after ATAAD repair. The rheologic effect of hematocrit on cerebral perfusion under deep hypothermia may be minimal.

Impact of Preoperative Platelet ADP/P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist Management in Patients Undergoing Elective Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: Postoperative bleeding remains an important issue in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), being associated with blood product transfusions (BPT) and re-exploration. Since 2020, We have implemented a strict preoperative antithrombotic, specifically platelet ADP/P2Y12 receptor antagonist, management based on the results of a previous study of our institution. The objective of the present study was to assess its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent elective isolated CABG between 2017 and 2022 at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven were included and divided into two groups, based on whether they were treated according to the modified antithrombotic management. The primary endpoints were perioperative BPT and re-exploration for bleeding. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes of both cohorts. Results: A total of 1506 patients were included, of which 1064 belonged to the first historical cohort. The remaining 442 patients (second cohort) were treated according to the modified management. In the 439 matched pairs, the implementation of the strict protocol was associated with a reduced incidence of blood product transfusions (14.8% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (5 [interquartile range (IQR) 4–6] days vs. 6 [IQR 5–7.5] days, p &lt; 0.001), whereas the incidence of postoperative MI and stroke did not differ. Re-exploration for bleeding was less frequently observed in the second cohort (1.4% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.052). Conclusions: The implementation of the modified strict preoperative ADP/P2Y12 antagonist management resulted in decreased incidence of blood product transfusions, shorter hospital stay and a clinically relevant decreased rate of re-exploration for bleeding.

Abstract 4141475: Prognostic Impact of Acute Kidney Injury Following Repair of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a multifactorial complication following repair of Stanford Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) with an alarmingly high incidence, varying from 20 to 77%. Postoperative AKI following life-threatening disease tends to be much more complex. However, the exact role of postprocedural AKI in the prognosis of patients undergoing TAAD repair has not been elucidated. Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of postprocedural AKI in patients undergoing TAAD repair. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality with several secondary endpoints. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using Review Manager software. Statistical significance was set at p &lt;0.05. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. Results: Our analysis included 21 studies comprising 10396 patients. Patients with AKI exhibited a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (RR=3.98; 95% CI: 3.04-5.22; p&lt;0.00001; I 2 =57%), stroke (RR= 2.05; 95% CI: 1.68-2.50; p&lt;0.00001; I 2 =32%), dialysis requirement (RR= 32.9; 95% CI: 10.39-104.24; p&lt;0.00001; I 2 =90%) (Figure 1), cardiovascular complications (RR= 2.85; 95% CI: 1.65-4.92; p&lt;0.0002; I 2 =85%), sepsis (RR= 4.92; 95% CI: 2.62-9.24; p&lt;0.00001; I 2 =64%), and re-exploration for bleeding (RR=2.46; 95%CI: 1.79-3.39; p&lt;0.00001; I 2 =58%) compared to those without AKI (Figure 2). Conclusion: Patients with AKI demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality, stroke, need for dialysis, sepsis, postoperative cardiovascular complications, and re-exploration for bleeding. Further prospective studies are required to better understand the prevention strategies and long-term effects on prognosis of AKI post-repair for TAAD.

Endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive versus sternotomy total arterial multivessel bypass grafting.

This single-centre study compared the perioperative outcomes after total arterial multivessel revascularization through endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive surgery compared to a conventional sternotomy approach. In this retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study, a total of 740 patients were analysed [endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CAB), N = 92; Sternotomy, N = 648]. After PSM (1:2 ratio), 73 Endo-CAB and 137 sternotomy patients were compared with an equal number of distal anastomoses (Endo-CAB 2.3 versus Sternotomy 2.4 anastomoses per patient, P = 0.082). We used 'textbook outcome' as a patient-orientated outcome measure, defined as the absence of 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative ischaemia, cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular events, wound infection, new onset arrhythmias, pneumonia, placement of chest drains and prolonged hospital stay (>7 days). Patients undergoing Endo-CAB had significantly more often a textbook outcome compared to the sternotomy group (78.1% vs 59.1%, P = 0.009). Endo-CAB patients had shorter hospital stay (4.0 vs 6.0 days, P < 0.001), less postoperative blood loss (360 vs 490 ml, P < 0.001) and a significant reduction of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (5.5% vs 17.5%, P = 0.015). Other postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups. Total arterial Endo-CAB demonstrates excellent postoperative outcomes compared to a sternotomy approach for multivessel coronary artery disease. These findings provide a strong basis for further expanding the multivessel Endo-CAB programme.

Right anterior thoracotomy vs. upper hemisternotomy for aortic valve replacement with Perceval S: is there a difference?

Our study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve through the right anterior thoracotomy and upper hemisternotomy approaches, and to determine if there are any differences between these two approaches. We carried out a study using data from 174 patients who underwent minimally invasive Perceval S valve implantation for aortic valve stenosis between January 2018 and August 2023. This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. The patients were divided into two groups: the hemisternotomy group (n = 100) and the right anterior thoracotomy group (n = 74). The overall in-hospital mortality was 1,7%. The cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were longer in the right anterior thoracotomy group (p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of stroke, paravalvular leak, mechanical ventilation time, blood transfusion requirements, pacemaker implantation, reexploration for bleeding, conversion, wound infection, or in-hospital stay. Postoperative chest drainage was lower (p < .001) and postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred less frequently (p = .044) in the right anterior thoracotomy group. The median intensive care unit stay was shorter in the right anterior thoracotomy group (p = .018). Aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve through either an upper hemisternotomy or a right anterior thoracotomy is a procedure associated with low perioperative complication rates. Right anterior thoracotomy for an aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve was associated with lower postoperative bleeding, a lower postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence and a shorter intensive care unit stay compared to upper hemistornotomy.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in Elderly Patients: Results from a Multicenter Study.

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has been increasingly adopted worldwide as an alternative to conventional sternotomy, especially for young patients. The remarkable results gained by MIMVS have encouraged its application in more complex and fragile patients, such as the elderly, though results in this subgroup remain controversial. It is the aim of this study to assess the postoperative outcomes of patients older than 75 years old undergoing MIMVS, and to compare these results to those of younger patients. Methods: The data of all patients undergoing MIMVS between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively collected at seven high-volume cardiac surgery centers. Patients were divided into two age-based groups: the young (<65 years old) and the elderly (>75 years old). A propensity score (PS) matching analysis obtained two comparable groups. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in both the unmatched and PS-matched populations. Results: Out of 1113 patients undergoing MIMVS, 524 were young and 279 were elderly. Elderly patients were more commonly affected by multiple comorbidities, with a higher EuroSCORE II (4.6 ± 5.5% vs. 1.6 ± 3.3%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative mortality, though the elderly had a greater incidence of postoperative complications, such as re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, reintubation, and a need for hemodialysis and blood transfusions. After PS matching, 119 pairs of young and elderly patients with similar risk profiles (EuroSCORE II 2.5 ± 4.7% vs. 2.7 ± 3.2%, p = 0.7) were compared, and no differences in all postoperative outcomes were found. Conclusions: Adequately selected elderly patients can report hospital outcomes similar to young patients after MIMVS.

Development of acute kidney injury following repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection is associated with increased mortality and complications: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates the repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). This systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of AKI in these patients. A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar identified relevant studies on the predictors and outcomes of AKI following TAAD repair. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints included stroke, dialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and other complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were used, with significance set at P < 0.05. Twenty-one studies (10 396 patients) were analyzed. AKI was associated with higher risks of 30-day mortality (risk ratio = 3.98), stroke (risk ratio = 2.05), dialysis/CRRT (risk ratio = 32.91), cardiovascular (risk ratio = 2.85) and respiratory complications (risk ratio = 2.13), sepsis (risk ratio = 4.92), and re-exploration for bleeding (risk ratio = 2.46). No significant differences were noted in sternal wound infection, tracheostomy, paraplegia, or hepatic failure. AKI significantly increases mortality, morbidity, hospital, and ICU stay duration in TAAD repair patients.

Redo surgical aortic valve replacement for bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration.

To compare isolated primary bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rSAVR) due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). Clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated SAVR and isolated rSAVR due to SVD between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2022, at Leipzig Heart Center were retrospectively compared with regard to the primary outcome of all-cause mortality or stroke during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes of interest included myocardial infarction, re-exploration for bleeding, and permanent pacemaker implantation. A total of 2620 patients, 39.5% females, with a median EuroSCORE II of 1.7 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-2.7] were identified, of which rSAVR was performed in 174 patients (6.6%). Patients undergoing primary SAVR were older (69 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.001) and were less likely to have a history of prior stroke (0.9% vs 4.0%, P = 0.003). Although both all-cause death and death or stroke occurred less often following primary SAVR (0.5% vs 5.8%, and 2.2% vs 6.9%, respectively; P < 0.001), prior surgery was not associated with adverse clinical outcome in multivariable analysis. In a matched comparison of 322 patients, rates of death or stroke did not differ between groups (4.8% for both rSAVR and SAVR, P = 1.0). Although redo surgery for SVD is associated with increased rates of early mortality and stroke by univariate analysis, much of this increased risk can be accounted for by comorbidities. Patients undergoing rSAVR on an elective basis can expect an outcome similar to that of primary SAVR.

Re-exploration for bleeding and long-term survival after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.

Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is a serious complication that occurs in 2.8-4.6% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Re-exploration has previously been associated with a higher risk of short-term mortality. However, a comprehensive analysis of long-term outcomes after re-exploration for bleeding has not been published. The authors performed a systematic, three databases search to identify studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients who required re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery compared to patients who did not, with at least 1-year of follow-up. Long-term survival was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and hospital length of stay. Random-effects models was used. Individual patient survival data was extracted from available survival curves and reconstructed using restricted mean survival time. Six studies totaling 135456 patients were included. The average follow-up was 5.5 years. In the individual patient data, patients who required re-exploration had a significantly higher risk of death compared with patients who did not [hazard ratio (HR): 1.21; 95% CI: 1.14-1.27; P <0.001], which was confirmed by the study-level survival analysis (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12-1.56; P <0.01). Re-exploration was also associated with a higher risk of operative mortality [odds ratio (OR): 5.25, 95% CI: 4.74-5.82, P <0.0001], stroke (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.72-2.43, P <0.0001), renal (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 3.43-4.39 P <0.0001) respiratory complications (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 2.96-5.17, P <0.0001), longer hospital length of stay (mean difference: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.68-3.69, P <0.0001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.30-2.65, P =0.0007). Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is associated with lower long-term survival and increased risk of short-term adverse events including operative mortality, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and longer hospital length of stay. To improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, strategies to prevent the need for re-exploration are necessary.

The relationship of sex and aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveEvaluate sex differences in patients undergoing repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). MethodsSex-stratified, single-center cohort study of patients undergoing ATAAD repair from 1997 to 2022. The primary outcome was aortic diameter at time of presentation with ATAAD. Secondary outcomes were mortality, myocardial infraction, stroke, hemodialysis, tracheostomy, re-exploration for bleeding, a composite of major adverse events, and long-term survival. ResultsIn 390 consecutive patients (150 women), men were younger than women (61.0 years; interquartile range [IQR], 50-70 years vs 70.5 years; IQR, 59-78 years; P < .001), had higher body mass index (28.6; IQR, 25.1-32.3 vs 25.4; IQR, 21.9-29.2; P < .001), more frequent peripheral vascular disease (11.7% vs 4.7%; P = .03), renal insufficiency (36.7% vs 22%; P = .003), malperfusion (34.2% vs 18.7%; P = .007), and smoking history (65% vs 44%; P < .001). There was no sex difference in median aortic diameter at the time of ATAAD (men: 5.3 cm; IQR, 4.9-6.1 cm and women: 5.2 cm; IQR, 4.6-5.9 cm; P = .12) even when adjusted for body mass index (men: 5.7 cm; IQR, 5.4-6.1 cm and women: 5.4 cm; IQR, 5.4-6.1 cm; P = .19). There was no sex difference in mortality (4.6% vs 6.0%; P = .70), major adverse events, or 10-year survival (50.3% vs 58.5%; P = .13). On multivariable analysis, there was no interaction between aneurysm size and sex (interaction P = .62). Sex was not associated with major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.07-7.39; P = .81). ConclusionsThere was no sex difference in aneurysm size at the time of presentation of ATAAD, even after adjustment for body mass index, and no interaction between aneurysm size and sex, suggesting that aortic diameter remains a reasonable criterion for intervention irrespective of sex.

Aprotinin in high-risk isolated coronary artery bypass graft patients: a 3-year propensity matched study

BackgroundAprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, has been used variably in cardiac surgery amidst ongoing debates about its safety following several previous studies. This study assesses the outcomes of aprotinin in high-risk isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (iCABG) patients.MethodsThe study retrospectively analysed a cohort of 1026 iCABG patients, including 51 patients who underwent aprotinin treatment. Logistic regression powered score matching was employed to compare aprotinin patients with a control group, in a propensity-matched cohort of 96 patients. The primary outcome measured was in-hospital death, with secondary outcomes including renal dysfunction, stroke, myocardial infarction, re-exploration for bleeding or tamponade, and postoperative stay durations.ResultsThe aprotinin cohort had high-risk preoperative patients with significantly higher EUROSCORE II values, 7.5 (± 4.2), compared to 3.9 (± 2.5) in control group. However, aprotinin group showed no statistically significant increase (p-value: 0.44) in hospital mortality with OR 2.5 [95% CI 0.51, 12.3]. Major secondary outcome rates of renal replacement therapy and postoperative stroke compared to the control group were also statistically insignificant between the two groups.ConclusionThis study suggests that aprotinin may be safely used in a select group of high-risk iCABG patients. The reintroduction of aprotinin under specific conditions reflects its potential benefits in managing bleeding in high-risk surgeries, but also underscores the complexity of its risk-benefit profile in such critical care settings. Nonetheless, it highlights the importance of carefully selecting patients and conducting additional research, including larger and more controlled studies to fully comprehend the potential risks and benefits of aprotinin.

Age-Specific Outcomes of Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Balancing Reoperation Risk with Anticoagulation Burden.

The choice of prosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains challenging. The risk of anticoagulation complications vs. the risk of aortic valve reintervention should be weighed. This study compared the outcomes of bioprosthetic vs. mechanical AVR in patients older and younger than 50. This retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2019 and involved 292 adult patients who underwent isolated AVR. The patients were divided according to their age (above 50 years or 50 years and younger) and the type of valves used in each age group. The outcomes of bioprosthetic valves (Groups 1a (>50 years) and 1b (≤50 years)) were compared with those of mechanical valves (Groups 2a (>50 years) and 2b (≤50 years)) in each age group. The groups had nearly equal rates of preexisting comorbidities except for Group 1b, in which the rate of hypertension was greater (32.6% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.025). This group also had higher rates of old stroke (8.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and higher creatinine clearance (127.62 (108.82-150.23) vs. 110.02 (84.87-144.49) mL/min; p = 0.026) than Group 1b. Patients in Group 1a were significantly older than Group 2a (64 (58-71) vs. 58 (54-67) years; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the NYHA class between the groups. The preoperative ejection fraction and other echocardiographic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. Re-exploration for bleeding was more common in patients older than 50 years who underwent mechanical valve replacement (p = 0.021). There was no difference in other postoperative complications between the groups. The groups had no differences in survival, stroke, or bleeding rates. Aortic valve reintervention was significantly greater in patients ≤ 50 years old with bioprosthetic valves. There were no differences between groups in the changes in left ventricular mass, ejection fraction, or peak aortic valve pressure during the 5-year follow-up. The outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic valve replacement were comparable in patients older than 50 years. Using bioprosthetic valves in patients younger than 50 years was associated with a greater rate of valve reintervention, with no beneficial effect on the risk of bleeding or stroke.

20 Years of triple-valve surgery in the UK: demographic and outcome trends.

To describe evolving demographic trends and early outcomes in patients undergoing triple-valve surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2019. We planned a retrospective analysis of national registry data including patients undergoing triple-valve surgery for all aetiologies of disease. We excluded patients in a critical preoperative state and those with missing admission dates. The study cohort was split into 5 consecutive 4-year cohorts (groups A, B, C, D and E). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included prolonged admission, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative stroke and postoperative dialysis. Binary logistic regression models were used to establish independent predictors of mortality, stroke, postoperative dialysis and re-exploration for bleeding in this high-risk cohort. We identified 1750 patients undergoing triple-valve surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2019. Triple valve surgery represents 3.1% of all patients in the dataset. Overall mean age of patients was 68.5 ± 12 years, having increased from 63 ±12 years in group A to 69 ± 12 years in group E (P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 9%, dropping from 21% in group A to 7% in group E (P < 0.001). Overall rates of re-exploration for bleeding (11%, P = 0.308) and postoperative dialysis (11%, P = 0.066) remained high across the observed time period. Triple valve replacement, redo sternotomy and poor preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction emerged as strong independent predictors of mortality. Triple-valve surgery remains rare in the UK. Early postoperative outcomes for triple valve surgery have improved over time. Redo sternotomy is a significant predictor of mortality. Attempts should be made to repair the mitral and/or tricuspid valves where technically possible.

Clinical outcomes of aortic root repair using pericardial autograft for acute type a aortic dissection

BackgroundFor acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root with root diameter no more than 45 mm, there are various aortic root repair techniques. In this study, a novel surgical technique using a pericardial autograft for aortic root repair was introduced. We described its surgical steps in detail and compare its clinical outcomes with direct suture technique.MethodsBetween July 2017 and August 2022, 95 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic root repair were enrolled, including aortic root repair using pericardial autograft (group A, n = 49) or direct suture (group B, n = 46). The patient’s clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and a 5-year follow-up was conducted.ResultsThe 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative new-onset renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, stroke, and paraplegia occurred in 3%, 4%, 11%, 5%, and 2% of the overall patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality and complication rate between the two groups. The 30-day mortality and re-exploration for bleeding marked the primary endpoint events. Logistic regression analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between the primary endpoint events and surgical technique (odds ratio, 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.159; P = 0.026). The aortic valve insufficiency of the two groups were significantly improved after operation (group A, P < 0.001; group B, P < 0.001). During follow-up, there was no significant difference in short-term survival between the two groups after surgery (log-rank P = 0.75), and all patients were free from reoperation for aortic disease.ConclusionsPatients who underwent aortic root repair using pericardial autograft tended to have reduced 30-day mortality and a lower risk of re-exploration for bleeding. Using pericardial autograft for aortic root repair is a safe and useful approach for patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.

Bleeding in minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement

BackgroundObservational studies have shown reduced perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing minimally invasive, compared with full sternotomy, aortic valve replacement. Data from randomized trials are conflicting.MethodsThis was a Swedish single center study where adult patients with aortic stenosis, 100 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either minimally invasive (ministernotomy) or full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. The primary outcome was severe or massive bleeding defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in adult cardiac surgery (UDPB). Secondary outcomes included blood product transfusions, chest tube output, re-exploration for bleeding, and several other clinically relevant events.ResultsOut of 100 patients, three patients randomized to ministernotomy were intraoperatively converted to full sternotomy (none was bleeding-related). Three patients (6%) in the full sternotomy group and 3 patients (6%) in the ministernotomy group suffered severe or massive postoperative bleeding according to the UDPB definition (p = 1.00). Mean chest tube output during the first 12 postoperative hours was 350 (standard deviation (SD) 220) ml in the full sternotomy group and 270 (SD 190) ml in the ministernotomy group (p = 0.08). 28% of patients in the full sternotomy group and 36% of patients in the ministernotomy group received at least one packed red blood cells transfusion (p = 0.39). Two patients in each group (4%) underwent re-exploration for bleeding.ConclusionsMinimally invasive aortic valve replacement did not result in less bleeding-related outcomes compared to full sternotomy.Clinical Trial Registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02272621.

Thoracoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive versus off-pump bypass grafting for single vessel coronary artery disease – A propensity matched analysis

ObjectiveThis study compared perioperative outcomes after off-pump revascularization through a thoracoscopic-assisted (non-robotic) minimally invasive approach (Endo-CAB) or sternotomy approach (OPCAB) for patients with single vessel left anterior descending (LAD) disease. MethodsIn this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study, 266 consecutive patients were included in the Endo-CAB group (n = 136) and OPCAB group (n = 130). After propensity score matching 116 Endo-CAB and 116 OPCAB patients were compared. ‘Textbook outcome’ was defined as the absence of 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative ischemia, cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular events, wound infection, new-onset arrhythmias, pneumonia, placement of chest drains and prolonged hospital stay (> 7 days). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for textbook outcome. ResultsTextbook outcome occurred significantly more frequent in the Endo-CAB group compared to the OPCAB group (81.9% vs. 59.5%, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing Endo-CAB surgery had shorter hospital admission (3.0 [3.0–4.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0–6.0] days, p < 0.001), less blood loss (225 [150–355] vs. 450 [350–600] mL, p < 0.001). Other perioperative outcomes were comparable for both groups. Regression analysis demonstrated that Endo-CAB approach was an independent positive predictor for textbook outcome (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.61–5.66, p < 0.001). ConclusionsOur study suggests that patients undergoing Endo-CAB surgery have improved perioperative outcome resulting in higher rates of textbook outcome for the treatment of single vessel CAD. This technique could be widely available since routine thoracoscopic instruments are used.

Double arterial vs. single axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissections: a meta-analysis.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of double (axillary and femoral) vs. single (axillary) cannulation on early outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Materials & methods: Meta-analysis using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through August 23, 2023. Focused on operative mortality, postoperative stroke, re-exploration for bleeding, spinal cord injury, and renal replacement therapy. Results: Among 5 propensity score-matched studies with 2127 patients, double cannulation showed comparable mortality and higher rates of postoperative stroke (pooled odds ratio: 1.69, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-2.39) and need for renal replacement therapy (pooled odds ratio: 1.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.60) compared with single cannulation. Conclusion: Double arterial cannulation in ATAAD surgery is associated with increased postoperative stroke and renal replacement therapy than single cannulation.

Clinical Impact of the Endo-aortic Clamp for Redo Mitral Valve Surgery.

Aim of this study was to compare redo MV surgery patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy and EAC with redo MV patients undergoing surgery through other approaches. Redo MV patients from 7 European centers were analyzed. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints were stroke, re-exploration, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), respiratory failure, and intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital length-of-stay. Forty-nine patients underwent right mini-thoracotomy and EAC (22.7%), and 167 (77.3%) underwent surgery through other approaches (112 sternotomy, 40 unclamped mini-thoracotomies, and 15 mini-thoracotomies with trans-thoracic clamp). Thirty-day mortality, stroke, re-exploration for bleeding, and weaning failure were comparable. The EAC group showed significant lower rate of LCOS (p = 0.03) and shorter ICU (p = 0.04) and in-hospital length of stay (p = 0.002). The EAC allows the surgeon to reach the aorta, to clamp it, and to deliver the cardioplegia with a "no-touch" technique, with significant improvement in outcomes.

Continuous versus interrupted anastomotic technique for the hepaticojejunostomy: a prospective cohort study.

Interrupted sutures is the gold standard technique of hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for bilioenteric anastomosis. This study compares the safety and early complications of continuous and interrupted suture HJ. A prospective study involving all elective HJ between September 2019 and June 2021 was conducted. Patients with type IV or V biliary strictures, duct diameter less than 8mm and/or associated vascular injury, and bilateral HJ were excluded. The study patients were divided into two random groups; interrupted and continuous anastomotic technique. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters including pathology (benign vs. malignant), HJ leak, suture time, and postoperative morbidity were recorded. Total 34 patients were enroled. Eighteen (52.9%) were into interrupted and 16 (47.1%) patients into the continuous group. Both the groups were comparable with regards to demographics, haemoglobin, serum albumin, preoperative cholangitis and biliary stenting. Total three (8.8%) patients in the entire study developed bile leak; interrupted-2 and continuous-1, which was not significant statistically (P=1.0). Similarly, total number of sutures used and the mean operating time to complete anastomosis in the continuous group was significantly lesser than the interrupted group (2.3±0.5 versus 9.6±1.6, P<0.001) and (16.2±3.1 versus 38.6±9.2min, P<0.001), respectively. There were three (18.8%) re-exploration in the continuous anastomotic technique. Among them, only one re-operation was due to HJ anastomosis failure without mortality, remaining had re-exploration for bleeding (non-HJ). Both the techniques is safe with comparable morbidity. Further, continuous has an added advantage of decreased anastomotic time and cost.