Abstract Introduction Brief episodes of non-lethal myocardial ischemia/reperfusion preceding more sustained ischemia and reperfusion reduce lethal ischemia/reperfusion injury. The underlying protective signaling mechanisms of such ischemic preconditioning are unclear in their details. Among other protective mediators, neuronal acetylcholine (ACh) and its signaling through cholinergic receptors is involved in protection by ischemic preconditioning. Recently, a non-neuronal cardiac cholinergic system (NNCCS) has been identified, suggesting that a nervous system-independent, cardiomyocyte-derived acetylcholine signaling with signal amplification by auto- and paracrine cholinergic receptor activation could also participate in ischemic preconditioning. Aim We aimed to examine the role of NNCCS-derived ACh as a mediator of ischemic preconditioning. We therefore, in a reductionist approach, used isolated adult cardiomyocytes with hypoxic preconditioning (HPC). Methods Adult ventricular rat cardiomyocytes were isolated (from n=9 hearts), and HPC was induced by one cycle of 10 min hypoxia / 20 min reoxygenation. Thirty min normoxia served as control. Cardiomyocytes were then exposed to 30 min sustained hypoxia / 5 min reoxygenation (H/R), or a 35 min time control (TC). Cardiomyocyte viability was quantified before and after H/R or TC, respectively, by trypan blue staining. In a subgroup of experiments (cardiomyocytes from n=6 hearts) in the presence of physostigmine (0.2 mmol/L), intracellular ACh was quantified before and after HPC or normoxia and after sustained hypoxia and reoxygenation or TC, respectively, via liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry. Experiments on cardiomyocyte viability (from n=9 hearts) were repeated with the addition of cholinergic receptor antagonists (nicotinic: hexamethonium [1 µmol/L], muscarinic: atropine [0.1 µmol/L]) a) during the first 30 min with HPC or normoxia, b) during H/R or TC (30-65 min), or c) throughout the total 65 min protocol. Results The viability of cardiomyocytes subjected to H/R was better preserved with HPC than without (Figure A), and intracellular ACh was increased during hypoxia after prior HPC (Figure B). Cholinergic receptor antagonists during HPC did not change HPC´s protection (Figure A). However, the combination of both antagonists during sustained hypoxia abrogated HPC´s protection (Figure A), whereas nicotinic or muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonists alone did not. Cholinergic receptor antagonists throughout the total 65 min also abrogated HPC´s protection (Figure A). Conclusion: The NNCCS is activated by HPC and causal for HPC´s protection. HPC increases intracellular acetylcholine, and cardiomyocyte protection is mediated via both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors, suggesting an auto- and paracrine signal amplification on the cardiomyocyte level.Figure