Reduction Of Forearm Fractures Research Articles

Evaluating the hematoma block as an adjunct to procedural sedation for closed reduction of distal forearm fractures.

Although procedural sedation using intravenous agents is highly effective for forearm fracture reduction, the process is both resource and time intensive. Our objective was to determine whether the use of a hematoma block as an adjunct to procedural sedation with ketamine and midazolam reduces (1) pain during the procedure (scored using the Observational Score for Behavioral Distress-Revised score) or (2) the excess sedation time, defined by the time between procedure completion and discharge from sedation. Our secondary outcome measure was total ketamine dose administered during the procedure. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Before fracture reduction, children 3 to 17 years of age randomly received 2% lidocaine (L) or normal saline (NS) into the hematoma of their fracture site during sedation with intravenous ketamine and midazolam. Ninety patients were randomized: 50 to L and 40 to NS. The groups were similar with regard to age, sex, type of fracture, and prior administration of pain medication. Median Observational Score for Behavioral Distress-Revised scores were 1.11 and 1.69 for the L and NS groups, respectively (P = 0.23). Excess sedation time was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.36), with a median excess sedation time of 33.0 and 36.0 minutes for the L and NS groups, respectively. Mean ketamine dose administered was not different between the groups (P = 0.42). The mean total dose administered was 1.00 mg/kg and 1.07 mg/kg in the L and NS groups, respectively. Mean midazolam dose was 0.05 mg/kg for both groups. The use of a hematoma block as an adjunct to procedural sedation with ketamine and midazolam for forearm fracture reduction conferred no additional benefit and did not decrease observed pain scores, excess sedation time, or total ketamine dose administered.

22: Ultrasound-Guided Reductions of Distal Forearm Fractures in Children

22: Ultrasound-Guided Reductions of Distal Forearm Fractures in Children

Bier Block Regional Anesthesia and Casting for Forearm Fractures

Bier block regional anesthesia was first described in 1908; however, it is uncommonly used for fears of cardiac and neurological complications. Although recent studies have documented safe usage in an adult population, no study to date has investigated its use in a pediatric setting. In addition, most emergency departments feel that splint placement is safer than casting after acute forearm fracture reduction in the pediatric population. However, to our knowledge there is no such study that documents the complication rates associated with immediate casting. The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Bier block regional anesthesia and immediate cast application after closed reduction of pediatric forearm fractures. A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated for forearm fractures in a 2-year period at a major metropolitan pediatric hospital. Rates of complications and length and costs of the 2 procedures were analyzed. A total of 600 patients were treated with Bier block regional anesthesia and 645 were treated with conscious sedation for displaced fractures of the forearm in the 2-year study period. No complications requiring admission were seen in either group. No patient experienced compartment syndrome or a need for readmission secondary to cast application. 2.2% and 4.3% (P=0.0382) of patients in the Bier block and sedation groups, respectively, needed their cast bivalved secondary to swelling. The average time from initiation of procedural sedation to discharge was 1 hour and 42 minutes, whereas the time to discharge from initiation of Bier block regional anesthesia was 47 minutes (P<0.0001). The average cost for a patient treated with procedural sedation was $6313, whereas the average cost for the Bier block regional anesthesia group was $4956. Bier block regional anesthesia is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective method of reducing pediatric forearm fractures. Immediate cast application can be used without fear of major complications. Level III--retrospective review.

Procedural sedation and analgesia for reduction of distal forearm fractures in the paediatric emergency department: A clinical survey

Distal forearm fractures frequently require reduction in children. We set out to survey how such fractures are currently reduced at Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) sites. A survey was completed by paediatric emergency physicians at PREDICT sites. Survey questions covered departmental guidelines and resources and individual practice, agents used and limitations of fracture management using case vignettes. One hundred eleven of 145 (77%) possible surveys were returned. All 12 PREDICT sites have guidelines for the use of nitrous oxide and 11 of 12 for ketamine. Guidelines for other agents are less common and highly variable. The most frequently used procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) agents were ketamine (27%), nitrous oxide alone (19%) or in combination with intranasal fentanyl (18%) and Bier's block (11%). Most respondents indicated tolerance without reduction in fractures with angulation less than 20° (59%) and 10° (71%) in a 5- and 10-year-old patient, respectively. Most physicians (74%) would reduce up to a 25° angulated fracture in the ED with more displaced fractures being referred to theatre. The 44% of respondents listed the lack of an image intensifier in the ED as a limitation in their ability to reduce fractures. Paediatric distal forearm fractures are commonly reduced in the surveyed EDs, most commonly under ketamine or nitrous oxide. Areas of improvement include better defined cut-offs for fracture reduction and for referral to theatre, improved differential efficacy of PSA agents, standardised guidelines for PSA and introduction of image intensifiers into more EDs.

Sedation-assisted Orthopedic Reduction in Emergency Medicine: The Safety and Success of a One Physician/One Nurse Model

IntroductionMuch of the emergency medical research on sedation-assisted orthopedic reductions has been undertaken with two physicians––one dedicated to the sedation and one to the procedure. Clinical practice in community emergency departments (EDs), however, often involves only one physician, who both performs the procedure and simultaneously oversees the crendentialed registered nurse who administers the sedation medication and monitors the patient. Although the dual-physician model is advocated by some, evidence in support of its superiority is lacking.Methods:In this electronic health records review we describe sedation-assisted closed reductions of major joints and forearm fractures in three suburban community EDs. The type of procedure and sedation medication, need for specialty assistance, success rates, and intervention-requiring adverse events are reported.Results:During the 18-month study period, procedural sedation was performed 457 times on 442 patients undergoing closed reduction for shoulder dislocations (n = 111), elbow dislocations (n = 29), hip dislocations (n = 101), and forearm fractures (n = 201). In the vast majority of this cohort (98.4% [435/442]), a single emergency physician simultaneously managed both the procedural sedation and the initial orthopedic reduction without the assistance of a second physician. The reduction was successful or satisfactory in 96.6% (425/435; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.8–98.8%) of these cases, with a low incidence of intervention-requiring adverse events (2.8% [12/435]; 95% CI, 1.5–4.8%).Conclusion:Sedation-assisted closed reduction of major joint dislocations and forearm fractures can be performed effectively and safely in the ED using a one physician/one nurse model. A policy that requires a separate physician (or nurse anesthetist) to administer medications for all sedation-assisted ED procedures appears unwarranted. Further research is needed to determine which specific clinical scenarios might benefit from a dual-physician approach.

Do Children With High Body Mass Indices Have a Higher Incidence of Emesis When Undergoing Ketamine Sedation?

The objective of this study was to determine if overweight children are more likely than normal-weight children to require ondansetron when undergoing ketamine sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Patients between the ages of 2 and 18 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of I or II who underwent intravenous procedural sedation with ketamine with or without midazolam for uncomplicated forearm fracture reduction in an urban pediatric emergency department during the year 2007 were included. A review of sedation records was conducted for each visit. Data collected included demographics, sedation time, and doses of medications administered. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using an estimated height for the 50th percentile for age and sex. In 2007, all patients underwent procedural sedation per protocol. Per protocol, patients did not prophylactically receive ondansetron during procedural sedations. During the study period, 141 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 110 had an estimated BMI less than 25 kg/m; 31 had an estimated BMI of 25 kg/m or greater. Ten patients (7.1%) received ondansetron. Patients in the high-BMI group were more likely to have received ondansetron than those in the normal-BMI group (16.1% vs 4.5%, P = 0.04). Our data suggest that pediatric patients with high BMIs are at greater risk for nausea or emesis during ketamine sedation. Clinicians should consider prophylactic administration of ondansetron to this group of patients before performing ketamine sedation.

A Comparison of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Reduction Between Conscious Sedation and General Anesthesia

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of children whose fractures were manipulated with nitrous oxide with those fractures manipulated under a general anesthetic. We undertook a retrospective analysis of all children who presented to the emergency department with an angulated or displaced nonphyseal forearm fracture requiring manipulation over a 6-month period. Twenty-eight forearm fractures were manipulated using conscious sedation, whereas 27 were manipulated in the operating theatre under general anesthesia. The quality of reduction, the Cast Index, Padding Index, and Canterbury Index were similar between the 2 groups. There was a significant difference between the need for remanipulation in the nitrous oxide group (9) compared with the need for remanipulation in the theatre group (3). Despite a higher failure, manipulation of fractures in the emergency department using conscious sedation can achieve an adequate reduction and a high quality of cast. Failures were due to inherently more unstable fracture personalities. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Isolated Ring Finger Flexor Digitorum Profundus Entrapment After Closed Reduction and Intramedullary Fixation of Both-bone Forearm Fracture

Flexor tendon entrapment after a pediatric forearm fracture is a rarely reported complication that is often diagnosed late. Flexor tendon entrapment is more frequently reported after distal forearm fractures, and possible etiologies include fibrosis secondary to hemorrhage at the fracture site and simple entrapment of the muscle belly.This article describes a case of ring finger flexor digitorum profundus entrapment in a 12-year-old boy with a closed both-bone forearm fracture that was treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation. Preoperatively, the patient had full flexion and extension of all fingers. The entrapment was noted at the first postoperative follow-up when the patient could fully extend the ring finger proximal interphalangeal joint but was unable to concomitantly extend the metacarpal phalangeal joint. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound were obtained to identify the entrapment site. Intraoperatively, a portion of the flexor digitorum profundus musculotendinous junction was entrapped in the fracture site. After release of the entrapment, the patient gained immediate passive range of motion. Subsequently, the hardware was removed, and the patient healed and regained full ring finger function. To the authors' knowledge, this is the only report of isolated ring finger flexor digitorum profundus entrapment after closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of a pediatric forearm fracture. The authors recommend vigilant physical examination of passive and active range of motion of all digital joints with the wrist in flexion and extension before and after bony manipulation.

Screw elastic intramedullary nail for the management of adult forearm fractures

Background:The failure of the conventional nailing of both forearm bones or isolated fractures of radius and ulna pose a potential problem of nail migration and rotational instability, despite the best reduction. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the results of screw elastic intramedullary nail for the treatment of adult diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones, which effectively addresses the problems associated with the conventional nailing systems for the forearm fractures.Materials and Methods:Seventy-six adults with forearm fractures (radius and ulna or isolated fracture of the single bone) were retrospectively evaluated. Fifty males and 26 females with the mean age of 38 years (range, 18-70 years) underwent closed reduction and screw intramedullary nail fixation. Ten patients required limited open reduction. The fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA system. The average followup was 12 months (range, 6 to 18 months).Results:The mean surgical time was 45 minutes (35 to 65 minutes). The meantime to union was 14 weeks (10-21 weeks). The results were graded as excellent in 50, good in 18 patients, and acceptable in eight patients, using the criteria of Grace and Eversman. We had superficial infection in three cases, one case of delayed infection, painful bursa in two cases, delayed union in two cases, malunion with dislocation of the DRUJ in two cases, injury to the extensor tendon of the thumb in one case, and one case of incomplete radioulnar synostosis.Conclusion:Closed reduction and internal fixation of forearm fractures by screw intramedullary nails reestablishes the near normal relationship of the fractured fragments. Screw intramedullary nail effectively controls both rotatory forces and the migration of the nail. It produces excellent clinical results in isolated fractures of either bones, as well as both bones of the forearm in adults.

Mini-C-Arm Fluoroscopy for Emergency-Department Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures

Mini-C-Arm Fluoroscopy for Emergency-Department Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures

Higher Expression of Myosin Heavy Chain IIx in Wrist Flexors in Cerebral Palsy

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) use their paretic arm less than normal but have a relative overactivity of wrist flexors, causing an impairing flexed position of the wrist. Voluntary use of a muscle downregulates myosin heavy chain (MyHC) IIx, but it is unclear whether the relative overactivity of wrist flexors and extensors in children with CP affects MyHC expression compared to normal subjects. We therefore asked whether MyHC expression composition differs in wrist flexors compared to extensors in children with CP and in controls and whether it is related to clinical findings. We took muscle biopsies from wrist flexors and extensors during hand surgery in children with CP (n = 9) and during open reduction of forearm fractures in control children (n = 5). The expression of the MyHC I, IIa, and IIx isoforms were determined on silver-stained 6% SDS-PAGE. CP flexors showed a higher proportion of MyHC IIx (40%) than control flexors (16%) and CP extensors (20%). MyHC IIa isoform proportion was lower in CP flexors (27%) than in control flexors (46%) and in CP extensors (45%). MyHC I expression was lower in CP (36%) than in controls (46%) for wrist extensors only. Both the brain injury in CP and the different demands on flexors and extensors affect the expression of MyHCs. The higher amount of MyHC IIx in CP could be caused by a decreased voluntary use of the hemiplegic arm. More information on the structural difference between flexors and extensors in normal and spastic muscle could improve the understanding of strain of wrist extensors and possibly the development of flexion contractures in CP.

Mini-C-Arm Fluoroscopy for Emergency-Department Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures

Reduction of pediatric forearm fractures with the patient under sedation in the emergency department is a common practice throughout the United States. We hypothesized that the use of a mini-c-arm fluoroscopy device as an alternative to routine radiographs for evaluation of fracture reduction would (1) allow a more anatomic fracture reduction, (2) decrease the number of repeat reductions or subsequent procedures, (3) reduce overall radiation exposure to the patient, and (4) decrease the orthopaedic consultation time in the emergency department. A retrospective cohort analysis of 279 displaced forearm and wrist fractures treated with closed reduction and casting with the patient under sedation in the emergency department of a level-I pediatric trauma center was performed, and the data were compared with historical controls. One hundred and thirteen fracture reductions were assessed with a mini-c-arm device, and 166 fracture reductions were evaluated with radiographs. All patients had radiographs of the injury. Blinded, independent reviewers graded the quality of reduction for residual angulation and translation of the reduced fracture. Radiation exposure was determined by the average number of radiographs made through either modality. Emergency department and outpatient charts were reviewed to determine the total orthopaedic consultation time and the need for repeat reductions or operative intervention. Pediatric forearm fractures undergoing closed reduction with assistance of the mini c-arm had a significant improvement in reduction quality (average angulation [and standard deviation], 6° ± 4° vs. 8 ± 6°; p = 0.02), a decrease in repeat fracture reduction and need for subsequent operative treatment (two [2%] of 113 fractures vs. fourteen [8.4%] of 166 fractures; p = 0.0001), and a decrease in radiation exposure to the patient (mean, 14.0 ± 10.3 mrem vs. 50.0 ± 12.7 mrem). The average orthopaedic consultation time was decreased with use of a mini c-arm (28 ± 12 min vs. 47 ± 19 min, p < 0.001). Use of the mini c-arm to assist in the closed reduction of pediatric forearm and wrist fractures in the emergency department can improve the quality of the reduction, decrease the radiation exposure to the patient, and decrease the need for repeat fracture reduction or additional procedures. Mini-c-arm imaging can also decrease the average orthopaedic consultation time for fracture reduction.

A Prospective Study on the Effectiveness of Cotton Versus Waterproof Cast Padding in Maintaining the Reduction of Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures

Distal forearm fractures, one of the most common fractures seen in the pediatric population, are regularly treated by closed reduction and casting. Our study investigates the effectiveness of Gore-Tex-lined casting in maintaining the reduction of 100% displaced distal forearm fractures compared with traditional cotton-lined casts. We screened all patients from February 2007 to July 2009 who presented to Children's Hospital in Birmingham, AL with a distal radius fracture. Only patients with 100% displaced distal radius fractures were eligible to be assigned to either the cotton-lined or Gore-Tex-lined cast groups. Power analysis was performed to identify an adequate patient sample size. The mean maximum change between initial post-reduction x-rays and follow-up x-rays for anterior-posterior (AP) angulation, AP displacement, lateral angulation, and lateral displacement of the radius were calculated for both cotton and Gore-Tex groups. The rate of subsequent intervention and/or unacceptable results for each group was also analyzed. Seven hundred and twenty-two patients were treated with distal radius fractures at our hospital with 59 patients eligible for inclusion in our study. Thirty-six of our patients were treated with cotton-lined casts, and 23 patients were treated with Gore-Tex-lined cast. The mean maximum change in AP angulation, AP displacement, lateral angulation, and lateral displacement of the radius after initial reduction was 9.2 degrees, 6.9%, 13.9 degrees, and 13.6%, respectively, for the cotton-lined cast group and 7.7 degrees, 6.1%, 14.6 degrees, and 9.6%, respectively, for the Gore-Tex-lined cast group. There were no statistical differences between the means of the 4 measurements (P=0.33, 0.69, 0.73, and 0.10, respectively). There were also no significant differences between groups for final AP and lateral angulation and displacement. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in all measurements between cotton and Gore-Tex groups. Gore-Tex and cotton-lined casts are equally effective in their ability to maintain the reduction of 100% displaced distal forearm fractures. Thus, Gore-Tex-lined casts can be offered to pediatric patients immediately after closed reduction of distal radius fractures of any severity. Therapeutic level II.

A Prospective Study on the Effectiveness of Cotton Versus Waterproof Cast Padding in Maintaining the Reduction of Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures

A Prospective Study on the Effectiveness of Cotton Versus Waterproof Cast Padding in Maintaining the Reduction of Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures

Closed Reduction of Distal Forearm Fractures by Pediatric Emergency Physicians

The objective of this study was to determine if there exist differences in length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) and need for reintervention to restore alignment after distal forearm fracture reduction by pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) versus postgraduate year 3 or 4 orthopedic residents. In a prospective trial at a busy urban pediatric ED, children with closed distal forearm fractures that met predefined criteria for manipulation were randomized to treatment by a postgraduate year 3 or 4 orthopedic resident or by a pediatric EP who had received focused training in forearm fracture reduction. Prereduction, postreduction, and follow-up radiographs were evaluated by an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon who was unaware of the assigned group. The following outcomes were assessed: LOS during the initial ED encounter, adequacy of alignment immediately postreduction and at follow-up visits after discharge from the ED, the need for remanipulation, unscheduled ED visits, and radiographic healing at 6-8 weeks after injury. A total of 103 children were randomized into the pediatric EP (52 patients, mean age 9.1 years) and orthopedic resident (51 patients, mean age 9.7 years) groups. Patients in the two groups were similar in age, involvement of the physes, degree of angulation, percentage of displacement, and need for procedural sedation. The mean LOS in the ED was 4.5 hours in the pediatric EP group versus 5.0 hours in the orthopedic resident group (difference in means -0.5 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.26 to 0.37 hours). Remanipulation was required in 4 of 48 (8.3%) in the pediatric EP group versus 6 of 48 (12.5%) in the orthopedic resident group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.16 to 2.67). Unscheduled ED visits for cast-related problems occurred in 6 of 51 (11.8%) in the pediatric EP group and 4 of 52 (7.7%) in the orthopedic resident group (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 0.38 to 6.39). None of these patients with unscheduled ED visits developed compartment syndrome or required admission. Length of stay in the ED and clinical outcomes after closed reduction of forearm fractures by trained pediatric EPs are comparable to those after closed reduction by orthopedic residents.

Pediatric Distal Radial Fractures Treated by Emergency Physicians

Abstract Background: The initial management of distal radius fractures in children is part of the usual practice of Emergency Medicine. However, no data are available evaluating the outcome of pediatric forearm fractures that undergo closed reduction and casting by emergency physicians. Study Objective: To assess short-term outcomes after distal forearm fracture reductions performed by emergency physicians. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with matched controls was performed on children with a closed, displaced, or angulated distal forearm fracture that required manipulation. The study group was defined as patients in whom emergency physicians performed closed manipulation and cast immobilization without orthopedic consultation. The control group was defined as patients who had closed reduction by an orthopedic resident. Two controls were identified for each study patient on or around the same date of visit. During the 20-month period, the medical records of 22 study patients and 42 controls were reviewed. The two groups were similar in age, fracture angulation and displacement, and skeletal maturity. Results: All patients had acceptable alignment at 3–5-day follow-up. Two study patients and one control required re-manipulation at subsequent follow-up ( p = 0.34). All other patients in both groups who were seen at follow-up had satisfactory healing and function at 6–8 weeks after injury. Three study patients and 4 controls had an unscheduled outpatient visit to the Emergency Department (ED) for cast-related problems ( p = 0.80). None of these patients developed compartment syndrome. The mean length of stay in the ED was lower in the study group than in the control group (3.1 h compared to 5.1 h, respectively; p = 0.0026). The mean facility charge also was lower in the study group ($2182.50 compared to $3031 in the control group; p = 0.0006). Conclusions: Our results suggest that emergency physicians may be able to successfully provide restorative care for distal forearm fractures using closed reduction technique. Care rendered by emergency physicians was associated with a shorter length of stay and lower facility charges.

Ultrasound as an aid for reduction of paediatric forearm fractures

BackgroundDisplaced distal forearm fractures are frequently reduced in emergency departments. Not infrequently, some are not done adequately and require the tedious process of repeating the procedure, with repeated X-rays and radiation exposure, and inconvenience to patient and staff. The use of ultrasound (US) in its expanding role in the practice of emergency medicine has been proposed to visualise bone positioning.AimOur department embarked on this proof of concept study to assess the usefulness of this tool.MethodBy way of convenience sampling, we looked at whether our US interpretation correlated with the corresponding X-ray findings, pre and post manipulation of suitable fractures.ResultsOut of 42 patients recruited over a 1-year period, we were successful in 38 (90%). Four were “unsuccessful” (10%) due to technique rather than equipment or patient factors.ConclusionWhilst before we were blind prior to a post-reduction X-ray, this “new” additional role of the ultrasound (very accessible, cost effective and safe) can now aid us in our decision making, thereby enhancing the work flow of this group of patients through the department.

422: Ultrasound-Guided Reduction of Distal Forearm Fractures by Emergency Physicians

No previous studies have compared ultrasound (US)-guided fracture reduction to non-US-guided fracture reduction. Our objective was to determine if US-guided distal forearm fracture reduction improved first-attempt success rate.

Procedural sedation for fracture reduction in children with hyperactivity

Objective Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have a higher rate of more severe injuries than the general population. However, their ADHD may cause them to respond differently to procedural sedation required for treatment. The purpose of this article is to compare procedural sedation for children with and without ADHD. Methods Retrospectively, 44 patients with ADHD and 41 controls sedated with fentanyl and midazolam for forearm-fracture reduction in the emergency department (ED) at a children's hospital were identified. Drug dosages, vital signs, and sedation scores were compared. Results Drug dosages, vital signs, and sedation scores did not significantly differ between cases and controls. Mean ED visit duration was significantly longer for patients with ADHD than for controls as was sedation duration. Conclusions Children with and without ADHD were equally sedated with the same total drug dosages. The differences in sedation duration and visit duration warrant further investigation.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Modified Forearm and Conventional Minidose Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Reduction of Distal Forearm Fractures in Children

Minidose intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) and modified forearm IVRA have been used for closed reduction of forearm fractures and for hand surgery in children. Children (5-17 years old) with forearm fractures presenting to a pediatric emergency department were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to test if modified forearm and minidose IVRA together would provide improved analgesia with reduced risk of anesthetic toxicity compared with conventional minidose IVRA. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (FACES) and an objective pain scale (OPS) score at baseline and at critical times. Spearman rank correlation and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to compare interobserver pain measures and detect differences between the groups over time. Among the 62 patients in the study, no significant differences were observed between groups in objective measures of blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate at baseline, 5 minutes after IVRA, during surgical reduction, and 15 minutes after reduction. Nurses reported patients experienced a reduction in pain of 2.5 (SD, 3.1) on FACES and 2.3 (SD, 3.1) on OPS at 5 minutes after sedation (P < 0.001 for both). From time of reduction to 15 minutes after the procedure, FACES score declined 1.7 (SD, 3.4) (P = 0.001), and OPS declined 2.1 (SD, 3.6) (P = 0.002). No significant differences were found between experimental arms. The modified forearm minidose IVRA procedure is an acceptable alternative for the relief of pain that usually accompanies the manipulation and reduction of forearm fractures but does not appear to provide additional pain relief compared with conventional minidose IVRA. Level I, therapeutic study.