Tile drainage systems are extensively implemented across the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin (GLB) to enhance agricultural productivity on poorly drained soils. However, these systems substantially contribute to excess nutrient runoff, particularly phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), exacerbating eutrophication and harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes. This literature review synthesized current knowledge on nutrient loadings from tile-drained agricultural watersheds and evaluated the effectiveness of various agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in mitigating nutrient losses in the GLB. Through a meta-synthesis of field and watershed scale monitoring and modeling studies and statistical analysis using Box-Whisker plots and Monte Carlo simulations, we assessed the nutrient reduction potential of representative BMPs, including cover cropping, nutrient management, controlled drainage, and constructed wetlands in tile-drained landscapes. Findings indicated that individual BMPs substantially reduced nutrient loadings, but the effectiveness of these BMPs depended on site-specific factors, including climate conditions, soil type, and drainage system design. Integrated approaches at field, edge-of-field, and watershed scales with a combination of multiple BMPs enhanced nutrient reduction benefits, aligning with regional water quality targets. The review also highlighted the challenges of climate change that may undermine BMP performance by altering precipitation patterns and increasing extreme weather events. To address these complexities, we proposed a framework for developing adaptive BMP scenarios tailored to specific watershed conditions, emphasizing the need for long-term monitoring and hydrologic model enhancements. This framework was designed to help policymakers, stakeholders, and farmers protect water quality and balance agricultural productivity in the GLB and similar agricultural regions globally.
Read full abstract