Reduce Heart Dose Research Articles

Dosimetric and NTCP advantages of robust proton therapy over robust VMAT for Stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era

AimsTo assess the robustness and to define the dosimetric and NTCP advantages of pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) compared with VMAT for unresectable Stage III non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) in the immunotherapy era. Material and methods10 patients were re-planned with VMAT and PBSPT using: 1) ITV-based robust optimization with 0.5 cm setup uncertainties and (for PBSPT) 3.5 % range uncertainties on free-breathing CT 2) CTV-based RO including all 4DCTs anatomies. Target coverage (TC), organs at risk dose and TC robustness (TCR), set at V95%, were compared. The NTCP risk for radiation pneumonitis (RP), 24-month mortality (24MM), G2 + acute esophageal toxicity (ET), the dose to the immune system (EDIC) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery V15 < 10 % were registered. Wilcoxon test was used. ResultsBoth PBSPT methods improved TC and TCR (p < 0.01). The mean lung dose and lung V20 were lower with PBSPT (p < 0.01). Median mean heart dose reduction with PBSPT was 8 Gy (p < 0.001). PT lowered median LAD V15 (p = 0.004).ΔNTCP > 5 % with PBSPT was observed for two patients for RP and for five patients for 24 MM. ΔNTCP for ≥ G2 ET was not in favor of PBSPT for all patients. PBSPT halved median EDIC (4.9/5.1 Gy for ITV/CTV-based VMAT vs 2.3 Gy for both ITV/CTV-based PBSPT, p < 0.01). ConclusionsPBSPT is a robust approach with significant dosimetric and NTCP advantages over VMAT; the EDIC reduction could allow for a better integration with immunotherapy. A clinical benefit for a subset of NSCLC patients is expected.

Can physical parameters from radiation simulation scan with deep inspiratory breath hold predict magnitude of heart dose reduction?

ABSTRACT Introduction: Deep inspiratory breath hold is one of the techniques for reducing the heart doses for left breast cancers. This study was conducted to confirm use of physical parameters from DIBH simulation CT scan like DIBH amplitude alongside several novel parameters to predict the heart dose reduction. Materials and Methods: Segmentation and planning of radiation to the left breast on the free breathing (FB) and DIBH simulation scan was performed for 50 left-sided breast cancer patients treated with DIBH technique. Physical parameters, namely DIBH amplitude, anterior sternal displacement, diaphragmatic excursion, ratio of lung volume (cc) in DIBH scan to lung volume in FB scan (cc), and delta heart volume in field (DHVIF), were extracted and were compared with magnitude of heart dose reduction (mean heart dose, V30Gy, and D5%). Results: Forty-eight (96%) patients achieved reduction in the mean heart dose with DIBH technique, while all patients had reduction in V30Gy. The median reduction was 41%, 89.7%, and 63% in the mean dose, V30Gy, and D5%, respectively. While DIBH did not correlate with heart dose reduction, ratio of lung volumes and DHVIF showed a strong positive correlation with heart dose reduction (P &lt; 0.05). Sternal displacement correlated weakly with heart dose reduction but strongly with DHVIF, demonstrating to be an indirect predictor. Conclusions: Physical parameters like anterior sternal displacement, ratio of lung volumes of DIBH to FB, and possibly diaphragmatic movement can predict the dose reduction before the dose calculations by the physicist. These parameters can be used to construct a model to predict heart dose reduction.

Technical note: Clinical evaluation of a newly released surface-guided radiation therapy system on DIBH for left breast radiation therapy.

It has been shown that a significant reduction of mean heart dose and left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose can be achieved through the use of DIBH for left breast radiation therapy. Surface-guided DIBH has been widely adopted during the last decade, and there are mainly three commercially available SGRT systems. The reports of the performance of a newly released SGRT system for DIBH application are currently very limited. To evaluate the clinical performance of a newly released SGRT system on DIBH for left breast radiation therapy. Twenty-five left breast cancer patients treated with DIBH utilizing Varian's Identify system were included (total 493-fraction treatments). Four aspects of the clinical performance were evaluated: Identify offsets of free breathing post patient setup from tattoos, Identify offsets during DIBH, Identify agreement with radiographic ports during DIBH, and DIBH reference surface re-capture post patient shifts. The systematic and random errors of free breathing Identify offsets post patient setup were calculated for each patient, as well as for offsets during DIBH. Radiographic ports were taken when the patient's DIBH position was within the clinical tolerance of (±0.3cm,±30 ), and these were then compared with treatment field DRRs. If the ports showed that the patient alignment did not agree with the DRRs within 3mm, a patient shift was performed. A new reference surface was captured and verification ports were taken. The all-patient average systematic and random errors of Identify offsets for free breathing were within (0.4cm, 1.50 ) post tattoo setup. The maximum per-patient systematic and random errors were (1.1cm, 6.20 ) and (0.9cm, 20 ), and the maximum amplitude of Identify offsets were (2.59cm, 90 ). All 493-fraction DIBH treatments were delivered and successfully guided by the Identify SGRT system. The systematic and random errors of Identify offsets for DIBH were within (0.2cm, 2.30 ). Seven patients needed re-captured surface references due to surface variation or position shifts based on the ports. All patient DIBH verification ports guided by Identify were approved by attending physicians. This evaluation showed that the Identify system performed effectively for surface-guided patient setup and surface-guided DIBH imaging and treatment delivery. The feature of color-coded real-time patient surface matching feedback facilitated the evaluation of the patient alignment accuracy and the adjustment of the patient position to match the reference.

Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for free-breathing whole-breast irradiation: A planning study.

Currently, recommended heart dose constraints are difficult to meet in whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for left-sided breast cancer patients, who cannot be treated with the deep inspiration breath hold. We performed a radiotherapy planning study to establish if the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for better sparing of the heart and its subvolumes than the three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), and how these attempts affect the dose delivered to the other organs. A total of 17 left-sided and 10 right-sided consecutive patients treated with free-breathing WBI were retrospectively included. The 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated. Several dose-volume parameters and plan quality indices were compared, separately for the left- and right-sided plans. All the techniques fulfilled the planning objectives. In the left-sided plans, there was no heart or left ventricle dose reduction with IMRT, nor with VMAT; the maximum dose in the left anterior descending coronary artery was reduced with VMAT (P = 0.005); V5 for the contralateral breast, contralateral lung, and total-body increased markedly in VMAT, and for the ipsilateral lung (V5IL) also in IMRT, compared with 3D-CRT (P < 0.001). In the right-sided plans, the V5 values, except for V5IL, did not differ between the three techniques. IMRT and VMAT had a limited heart-sparing benefit in the left-sided free-breathing WBI, at the cost of increased low-dose volumes, measured by V5. The low-dose volumes are not increased by IMRT or VMAT in the right-sided WBI, where heart sparing is not a problem, but the attempts to reduce cardiac doses in the left-sided WBI increase them.

A Potential Pitfall and Clinical Solutions in Surface-Guided Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an effective technique to spare the heart in treating left-sided breast cancer. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is increasingly applied in DIBH setup and motion monitoring. Patient-specific breathing behavior, either thoracically driven or abdominally driven (A-DIBH), should be unaltered, online identified, and monitored accordingly to ensure reproducible heart-sparing treatment. Sixty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SGRT were analyzed: 20 A-DIBH patients with vertical chest elevation (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were prospectively identified, and 40 control patients were retrospectively and randomly selected for comparison. At simulation, both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) were acquired, guided by a motion surrogate placed around the xiphoid process. For SGRT treatment setups, the region of interest (ROI) was defined on the CT chest surface, and the surrogate-based setup was a backup. For all 60 patients, the VCE was measured as the average of the FB-to-DIBH elevations at the breast and xiphoid process, together with abdominal elevation. In the 40-patient control group, A-DIBH patients (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were identified. Of the 20 A-DIBH patients, 10 were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, and 10 patients were treated with tangent plans. Clinical DIBH plans were recalculated on FB CT to compare maximum dose (DMax), 5% of the maximum dose (D5%), mean dose (DMean), and V30Gy, V20Gy, and V5Gy of the heart and lungs and their significance. In the 20 A-DIBH patients, VCE=3 ± 2 mm, surrogate motion (9 ± 6 mm), and abdomen motion of 14 ± 5 mm are found. Heart dose reduction from FB to DIBH is significant (P < .01): ∆DMax=-8.4 ± 9.8 Gy, ∆D5%=-2.4 ± 4.4 Gy, and ∆DMean=-0.6 ± 0.9 Gy. Six out of 40 control patients (15%) are found to have VCE ≤ 5 mm. A-DIBH (VCE ≤ 5 mm) patient population is significant (15%), and they should be identified in the SGRT workflow and monitored accordingly. A new abdominal ROI or an abdominal surrogate should be used instead of the conventional chest-only ROI. Patient-specific DIBH should be preserved for higher reproducibility to ensure heart sparing.

Leveraging intelligent optimization for automated, cardiac-sparing accelerated partial breast treatment planning.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) yields similar rates of recurrence and cosmetic outcomes as compared to whole breast radiation therapy (RT) when patients and treatment techniques are appropriately selected. APBI combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising technique for precisely delivering high levels of radiation while avoiding uninvolved breast tissue. Here we investigate the feasibility of automatically generating high quality APBI plans in the Ethos adaptive workspace with a specific emphasis on sparing the heart. Nine patients (10 target volumes) were utilized to iteratively tune an Ethos APBI planning template for automatic plan generation. Twenty patients previously treated on a TrueBeam Edge accelerator were then automatically replanned using this template without manual intervention or reoptimization. The unbiased validation cohort Ethos plans were benchmarked via adherence to planning objectives, a comparison of DVH and quality indices against the clinical Edge plans, and qualitative reviews by two board-certified radiation oncologists. 85% (17/20) of automated validation cohort plans met all planning objectives; three plans did not achieve the contralateral lung V1.5Gy objective, but all other objectives were achieved. Compared to the Eclipse generated plans, the proposed Ethos template generated plans with greater evaluation planning target volume (PTV_Eval) V100% coverage (p = 0.01), significantly decreased heart V1.5Gy (p< 0.001), and increased contralateral breast V5Gy, skin D0.01cc, and RTOG conformity index (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively). However, only the reduction in heart dose was significant after correcting for multiple testing. Physicist-selected plans were deemed clinically acceptable without modification for 75% and 90% of plans by physicians A and B, respectively. Physicians A and B scored at least one automatically generated plan as clinically acceptable for 100% and 95% of planning intents, respectively. Standard left- and right-sided planning templates automatically generated APBI plans of comparable quality to manually generated plans treated on a stereotactic linear accelerator, with a significant reduction in heart dose compared to Eclipse generated plans. The methods presented in this work elucidate an approach for generating automated, cardiac-sparing APBI treatment plans for daily adaptive RT with high efficiency.

Development of Deep Learning Chest X-Ray Model for Cardiac Dose Prediction in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce the cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. This study aimed to develop a deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction to select patients with a potentially high risk of cardiac irradiation and need for DIBH radiotherapy. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> We used 103 pairs of anteroposterior and lateral chest X-ray data of left-sided breast cancer patients (training cohort: n = 59, validation cohort: n=19, test cohort: n = 25). All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by DIBH radiotherapy: the treatment plan consisted of two opposing tangential radiation fields. The prescription dose of the planning target volume was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. A convolutional neural network-based regression model was developed to predict the mean heart dose (∆MHD) reduction between free-breathing (MHD_FB) and DIBH. The model performance is evaluated as a binary classifier by setting the cutoff value of ∆MHD >1 Gy. <h3>Results</h3> The patient characteristics were as follows: the median (IQR) age was 52 (47–61) years, MHD_FB was 1.75 (1.14–2.47) Gy, and ∆MHD was 1.00 (0.52–1.64) Gy. The classification performance of the developed model showed a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 90.9%, a positive predictive value of 92.3%, a negative predictive value of 83.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.0%. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.864. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The proposed model could predict ∆MHD in breast radiotherapy, suggesting the potential of a classifier in which patients are more desirable for DIBH.

Development of deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce the cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. This study aimed to develop a deep learning chest X-ray model for cardiac dose prediction to select patients with a potentially high risk of cardiac irradiation and need for DIBH radiotherapy. We used 103 pairs of anteroposterior and lateral chest X-ray data of left-sided breast cancer patients (training cohort: n = 59, validation cohort: n = 19, test cohort: n = 25). All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by DIBH radiotherapy: the treatment plan consisted of three-dimensional, two opposing tangential radiation fields. The prescription dose of the planning target volume was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. A convolutional neural network-based regression model was developed to predict the mean heart dose (∆MHD) reduction between free-breathing (MHDFB) and DIBH. The model performance is evaluated as a binary classifier by setting the cutoff value of ∆MHD > 1 Gy. The patient characteristics were as follows: the median (IQR) age was 52 (47–61) years, MHDFB was 1.75 (1.14–2.47) Gy, and ∆MHD was 1.00 (0.52–1.64) Gy. The classification performance of the developed model showed a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 90.9%, a positive predictive value of 92.3%, a negative predictive value of 83.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.0%. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.864. The proposed model could predict ∆MHD in breast radiotherapy, suggesting the potential of a classifier in which patients are more desirable for DIBH.

TROG 14.04: Multicentre Study of Feasibility and Impact on Anxiety of DIBH in Breast Cancer Patients

AimsThe aim of TROG 14.04 was to assess the feasibility of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and its impact on radiation dose to the heart in patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Secondary end points pertained to patient anxiety and cost of delivering a DIBH programme. Materials and methodsThe study comprised two groups – left-sided breast cancer patients engaging DIBH and right-sided breast cancer patients using free breathing through radiotherapy. The primary end point was the feasibility of DIBH, defined as left-sided breast cancer patients' ability to breath hold for 15 s, decrease in heart dose in DIBH compared with the free breathing treatment plan and reproducibility of radiotherapy delivery using mid-lung distance (MLD) assessed on electronic portal imaging as the surrogate. The time required for treatment delivery, patient-reported outcomes and resource requirement were compared between the groups. ResultsBetween February and November 2018, 32 left-sided and 30 right-sided breast cancer patients from six radiotherapy centres were enrolled. Two left-sided breast cancer patients did not undergo DIBH (one treated in free breathing as per investigator choice, one withdrawn). The mean heart dose was reduced from 2.8 Gy (free breathing) to 1.5 Gy (DIBH). Set-up reproducibility in the first week of treatment assessed by MLD was 1.88 ± 1.04 mm (average ± 1 standard deviation) for DIBH and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm for free breathing patients. Using a reproducibility cut-off for MLD of 2 mm (1 standard deviation) as per study protocol, DIBH was feasible for 67% of DIBH patients. Radiotherapy delivery using DIBH took about 2 min longer than for free breathing. Anxiety was not significantly different in DIBH patients and decreased over the course of treatment in both groups. ConclusionAlthough DIBH was shown to require about 2 min longer per treatment slot, it has the potential to reduce heart dose in left-sided breast cancer patients by nearly a half, provided careful assessment of breath hold reproducibility is carried out.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer: Initial experience with Active Breathing Coordinator™ in a regional hospital.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) has become standard in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer to reduce the heart dose. This study evaluated breath-hold stability and reproducibility using Elekta's Active Breathing Coordinator™ (ABC) and its effectiveness and feasibility in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Eligible patients were planned with free breathing (FB) and DIBH protocols. DIBH treatment was considered if the mean heart dose (MHD) was ≥2 Gy on the FB plan. Those who proceeded with DIBH treatment were enrolled for the pilot study. Electronic portal images of DIBH treatment beams were taken using the movie-exposure mode for breath-hold stability and reproducibility analysis. DIBH effectiveness in heart dose reduction and impact on simulation and treatment durations were compared with FB protocol. Out of 56 eligible patients, 15 proceeded with DIBH treatment. The mean difference of patient setup within a single breath-hold was 0.4 mm; between different breath-holds of the same beam 1.1 mm and between different days 2.6 mm. DIBH reduced the MHD by 47% and the mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose by 35%. DIBH took longer time than FB in simulation and treatment. At least 14% of the eligible patients did not tolerate DIBH during simulation. ABC leads to stable and reproducible breath-holds and results in significant heart dose reductions. It may not be tolerated by all patients and has resource implications.

Exposure of the heart in lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of heart doses published during 2013 to 2020

Background and purposeLung cancer radiotherapy increases the risk of cardiotoxicity and heart radiation dose is an independent predictor of poor survival. This study describes heart doses and strategies aiming to reduce exposure. Materials and methodsA systematic review of lung cancer dosimetry studies reporting heart doses published 2013–2020 was undertaken. Doses were compared according to laterality, region irradiated, treatment modality (stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and non-SABR), planning technique, and respiratory motion management. ResultsFor 392 non-SABR regimens in 105 studies, the average MHD was 10.3 Gy (0.0–48.4) and was not significantly different between left and right-sided tumours. It was similar between IMRT and 3DCRT (10.9 Gy versus 10.6 Gy) and lower with particle beam therapy (proton 7.0 Gy; carbon-ion 1.9 Gy). Active respiratory motion management reduced exposure (7.4 Gy versus 9.3 Gy). For 168 SABR regimens in 35 studies, MHD was 4.0 Gy (0.0–32.4). Exposure was higher in central and lower lobe lesions (6.3 and 5.8 Gy respectively). MHD was lowest for carbon ions (0.5 Gy) compared to other techniques. Active respiratory motion management reduced exposure (2.4 Gy versus 5.0 Gy). Delineation guidelines and Dose Volume Constraints for the heart varied substantially. ConclusionsThere is scope to reduce heart radiation dose in lung cancer radiotherapy. Consensus on planning objectives, contouring and DVCs for the heart may lead to reduced heart doses in the future. For IMRT, more stringent optimisation objectives may reduce heart dose. Active respiratory motion management or particle therapy may be considered in situations where cardiac dose is high.

Comparison of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Versus Free Breathing in Radiotherapy for Left Sided Breast Cancer.

ObjectivesModern breast cancer techniques, such as the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique has been applied for left-sided breast cancer. Whether the DIBH regimen is the optimal solution for left-sided breast cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the differences of DIBH and free-breathing (FB) for patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer and provide a practical reference for clinical practice.MethodsRelevant research available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science published before November 30, 2021 was independently and systematically examined by two investigators. Data were extracted from eligible studies for assessing their qualities and calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4).ResultsForty-one studies with a total of 3599 left-sided breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FB, DIBH reduced heart dose (D mean, D max, V30, V10, V5), left anterior descending branch (LAD) dose (D mean, D max), ipsilateral lung dose (D mean, V20, V10, V5), and heart volume significantly. Lung volume increased greatly, and a statistically significant difference. For contralateral breast mean dose, DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB. The funnel plot suggested this study has no significant publication bias.ConclusionsAlthough DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB in contralateral breast mean dose, it can significantly reduce heart dose, LAD dose, ipsilateral lung dose, and heart volume. Conversely, it can remarkably increase the ipsilateral lung volume. This study suggests that soon DIBH could be more widely utilized in clinical practice because of its excellent dosimetric performance.

Evaluation of image-guided and surface-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients treated in deep inspiration breath-hold: A single institution experience.

Nowadays, deep inspiratory breath-hold is a common technique to reduce heart dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. This study evaluates the evolution of the breath-hold technique in our institute, from portal imaging during dose delivery to continuous monitoring with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT). Setup data and portal imaging results were analyzed for 98 patients treated before 2014, and SGRT data for 228 patients treated between 2018 and 2020. For the pre-SGRT group, systematic and random setup errors were calculated for different correction protocols. Residual errors and reproducibility of breath-holds were evaluated for both groups. The benefit of using SGRT for initial positioning was evaluated for another cohort of 47 patients. Online correction reduced the population mean error from 3.9mm (no corrections) to 1.4mm. Despite online setup correction, deviationsgreater than3mm were observed in about 10% and 20% of the treatment beams in ventral-dorsal and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. However, these percentages were much smaller than with offline protocols or no corrections. Mean absolute differences between breath-holds within a fraction were smaller in the SGRT-group (1.69mm) than in the pre-SGRT-group (2.10mm), and further improved with addition of visual feedback (1.30mm). SGRT for positioning did not improve setup accuracy, but slightly reduced the time for imaging and setup correction, allowing completion within 3.5min for 95% of fractions. For accurate radiotherapy breast treatments using deep inspiration breath-hold, daily imaging and correction is required. SGRT provides accurate information on patient positioning during treatment and improves patient compliance with visual feedback.

Effect of Education and Standardization of Cardiac Dose Constraints on Heart Dose in Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium

PurposeCardiac radiation exposure is associated with an increased rate of adverse cardiac events in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Previous analysis of practice patterns within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) revealed 1 in 4 patients received a mean heart dose >20 Gy and significant heterogeneity existed among treatment centers in using cardiac dose constraints. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of education and initiation of standardized cardiac dose constraints on heart dose across a statewide consortium. Methods and MaterialsFrom 2012 to 2020, 1681 patients from 27 academic and community centers who received radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC were included in this analysis. Dosimetric endpoints including mean heart dose (MHD), mean lung dose, and mean esophagus dose were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms. These dose metrics were grouped by year of treatment initiation for all patients. Education regarding data for cardiac dose constraints first occurred in small lung cancer working group meetings and then consortium-wide starting in 2016. In 2018, a quality metric requiring mean heart dose <20 Gy while maintaining dose coverage (D95) to the target was implemented. Dose metrics were compared before (2012-2016) versus after (2017-2020) initiation of interventions targeting cardiac constraints. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. ResultsAfter education and implementation of the heart dose performance metric, mean MHD declined from an average of 12.2 Gy preintervention to 10.4 Gy postintervention (P < .0001), and the percentage of patients receiving MHD >20 Gy was reduced from 21.1% to 10.3% (P < .0001). Mean lung dose and mean esophagus dose did not increase, and target coverage remained unchanged. ConclusionsEducation and implementation of a standardized cardiac dose quality measure across a statewide consortium was associated with a reduction of mean heart dose in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. These dose reductions were achieved without sacrificing target coverage, increasing mean lung dose, or increasing mean esophagus dose. Analysis of the clinical ramifications of the reduction in cardiac doses is ongoing.

Dosimetric Planning Tradeoffs to Reduce Heart Dose Using Machine Learning-Guided Decision Support Software in Patients with Lung Cancer

Cardiac toxicity is a well-recognized risk after radiation therapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the extent to which treatment planning optimization can reduce mean heart dose (MHD) without untoward increases in lung dose is unknown. Retrospective analysis of RT plans from 353 consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with intensity modulated RT (IMRT) or 3-dimensional conformal RT. Commercially available machine learning-guided clinical decision support software was used to match RT plans. A leave-one-out predictive model was used to examine lung dosimetric tradeoffs necessary to achieve a MHD reduction. Of all 232 patients, 91 patients (39%) had RT plan matches showing potential MHD reductions of >4 to 8 Gy without violating the upper limit of lung dose constraints (lung volume [V] receiving 20 Gy (V20 Gy) <37%, V5 Gy <70%, and mean lung dose [MLD] <20 Gy). When switching to IMRT, 75 of 103 patients (72.8%) had plan matches demonstrating improved MHD (average 2.0 Gy reduction, P < .0001) without violating lung constraints. Examining specific lung dose tradeoffs, a mean ≥3.7 Gy MHD reduction was achieved with corresponding absolute increases in lung V20 Gy, V5 Gy, and MLD of 3.3%, 5.0%, and 1.0 Gy, respectively. Nearly 40% of RT plans overall, and 73% when switched to IMRT, were predicted to have reductions in MHD >4 Gy with potentially clinically acceptable tradeoffs in lung dose. These observations demonstrate that decision support software for optimizing heart-lung dosimetric tradeoffs is feasible and may identify patients who might benefit most from more advanced RT technologies.

An Analysis of Daily Setup Variation in Prone Breast Radiation of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

For women with left-sided breast cancer, the most relevant side effect is collateral damage to the heart with radiation therapy. Prone treatment techniques have helped reduce heart dose, but is more unstable and difficult to replicate. Setup uncertainties can lead to higher than expected heart doses or under-dosing of breast tissue. Our objective was to investigate the potential dosimetric benefit of utilizing a low dose cone beam CT (CBCT) in the daily setup of prone left breast radiation.We performed a retrospective review patients treated at our institution between April 2019 and February 2020 in the prone position for left sided early-stage breast cancer. Patients were set up to clinical marks and a custom low dose partial arc CBCT was acquired with each fraction. Using the daily shifts, we calculated the delivered dose if these shifts were not performed. Differences between planned and pre-CBCT shift doses were recorded for the heart and breast tissue. Patients were grouped into 3 outcomes: (A) Significantly high heart dose: More than 10% increase in delivered heart dose from planned; (B) Poor Breast Coverage: More than 5% decrease in the volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose; or (C) Minimal Variation: No significant increase in heart dose or decrease in breast coverage. Patient factors were also collected. Statistical comparisons were made using t-tests.18 patients were included, with 283 daily CBCT shifts and an average of 15.8 CBCT's per patient (range 13-25). The mean age of the patients was 61.6 (39-80) and average BMI 28.3 (20.3 - 45). Breast and heart dose were available for 196 scans, of which 47 (24%) had high heart dose (A), 55 (28%) had poor breast coverage and only 98 (50%) had no more than minimal variation in either. Patients with breast size < 1000 cc had a 64.5% chance of a delivery with poor breast coverage or increased heart dose as opposed to 40% for women with larger breast (P < 0.01). The same relationship was seen for weight (P < 0.01), refer to Table 1. When combining the total dose for each patient, 3 (17%) patients were in group A (increased heart dose), 9 patients (50%) were in group B (poor breast coverage) and 6 patients (33%) were in group C. Patients with minimal variation had significantly higher weight (84 kg vs 66 kg, P = 0.038), BMI (33 vs 26, P = 0.03) and breast volumes (1716 cc vs 992 cc, P = 0.01).Overall, our study demonstrated significant variation in daily setup for patients receiving prone breast radiation. Only half of treatments would have been delivered with minimal variation and a majority of patients would have either received significantly increased heart dose or suboptimal breast coverage if setup errors were not corrected. Likelihood of a significant setup error was seen most in women with smaller breasts or lower weight.

Effect of Education and Standardization of Cardiac Dose Constraints on Heart Dose in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium

Cardiac radiation exposure is associated with an increased rate of adverse cardiac events in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Previous analysis of practice patterns within the statewide Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) revealed 1 in 4 patients received a mean heart dose > 20 Gy and significant heterogeneity existed among treatment centers in using cardiac dose constraints. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of education and initiation of standardized cardiac dose constraints on heart dose across a statewide consortium.From 2012 to 2020, 1604 patients from 27 academic and community centers who received radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC were included in this analysis. Dosimetric endpoints including mean heart dose (MHD), mean lung dose, and mean esophagus dose were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms. These dose metrics were grouped by year of treatment initiation for all patients. Education regarding data for cardiac dose constraints was discussed in small lung cancer working group meetings and consortium-wide starting in 2016. This was followed in 2018 by implementation of a quality metric requiring mean heart dose < 20 Gy while maintaining dose coverage (D95) to the tumor. Dose metrics were compared before (2012-2016) and after (2017-2019) initiation of interventions targeting cardiac constraints. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.Following education and implementation of the heart dose performance metric, mean MHD declined from an average of 12.2 Gy pre-intervention to 10.4 Gy post-intervention, and the percentage of patients receiving MHD > 20 Gy reduced by half. (Table). Mean lung dose and mean esophagus dose did not increase, and tumor coverage remained unchanged.Education and implementation of a standardized cardiac dose quality measure across a statewide consortium was associated with a reduction of mean heart dose in patients receiving radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. These dose reductions were achieved without sacrificing tumor coverage, increasing mean lung dose or mean esophagus dose. Analysis of the clinical ramifications of the reduction in cardiac doses is ongoing.

A Dosimetric Comparison of IMRT and 3D-CRT Using Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold (DIBH) and Free-Breathing (FB) Techniques in Gastric Mucosa Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma (MALT)

Definitive radiation therapy (RT) is a curative treatment modality for gastric MALT. Reducing radiation dose to organs at risk (OAR) is imperative for patients with curative disease and excellent long-term prognosis. Advanced RT planning with DIBH and/or IMRT is available to improve the therapeutic ratio of RT by minimizing dose to normal tissues while maintaining adequate target coverage. We aimed to compare dosimetric parameters when using different radiation planning and delivery techniques in patients with gastric MALT.After institutional review board approval, we identified adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with biopsy-proven gastric MALT who were treated at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Each patient underwent two simulation CT scans: free breathing (FB) and DIBH. Four plans were generated for each patient including DIBH-IMRT, DIBH-3DCRT, FB-IMRT, and FB-3DCRT with a prescribed dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions. The CTV was defined as the entire stomach including the gastroesophageal junction to the pylorus. The PTV included a 1 to 1.5 cm expansion from the CTV. Paired t-tests were used to compare mean calculated dose values for each OAR based on treatment technique.Our cohort consisted of 8 patients (6 male, 2 female) with a median age 62.5 years (39 to 83 years). Compared to 3D-CRT, IMRT was associated with significantly decreased heart dose for both DIBH (Dmean 354.7 vs 440.5 cGY, P = 0.029) and FB (Dmean 521.2 vs 699.6 cGY, P = 0.006). IMRT was also associated with decreased dose to the left ventricle (LV), left anterior descending artery (LAD), liver, and lungs compared to 3D in both FB and DIBH. For IMRT plans, DIBH was associated with significantly lower heart V30 and V20 and a trend towards significance for lower heart Dmean (354.7 vs 521.2 cGY, P = 0.059) in comparison to FB. For 3D plans, DIBH was associated with a lower heart V30 and V20, and a higher lung V20, V10, and V5 in comparison to FB.Both IMRT and DIBH represent modalities for reducing heart dose in gastric MALT patients receiving definitive RT. IMRT also reduces LV, LAD, liver and lung dose regardless of technique used to account for respiratory motion whereas DIBH was not associated with reduced doses to the LAD, kidney, or liver.

A Dosimetric Analysis of Reduction Cardiac Dose with Lead Shielding in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an important treatment modality after breast-conserving surgery. Due to its proximity, radiation therapy for the left breast can often lead to an escalated heart dose that can result in heart diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heart dose reduction by using lead shields surrounding the left breast. The doses of a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plan, an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the left breast tumor in a CIRS ATOM anthropomorphic female adult phantom were measured by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). To protect critical organs, the skin around the target area was covered by lead shields of two different thicknesses (0.125 mm and 0.25 mm). The results showed that compared to IMRT and 3D-CRT, VMAT provided better planning target volume (PTV) coverage, a better conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). With the use of lead shields, the thyroid dose was reduced by 5.12–27.5% and 20.51–30%, respectively; the heart dose was reduced by 49.41–50.12% and 56.38–57.42%, respectively; and the lung dose was reduced by 1.23–45.22% and 0.98–57.83%, respectively. Although the clinical application of lead shields was rare, this study verified that it could effectively decrease the heart dose from 4.31 ± 0.09 Gy to 1.88–2.18 Gy, thereby potentially reducing the risk of associated heart diseases by 14.8%. Further works to implement this method into clinical practice are needed.

Synthetic breath-hold CT generation from free-breathing CT: a novel deep learning approach to predict cardiac dose reduction in deep-inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy.

Deep-inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy (DIBH-RT) to reduce the cardiac dose irradiation is widely used but some patients experience little or no reduction. We constructed and compared two prediction models to evaluate the usefulness of our new synthetic DIBH-CT (sCT) model. Ninety-four left-sided breast cancer patients (training cohort: n = 64, test cohort: n = 30) underwent both free-breathing and DIBH planning. The U-Net-based sCT generation model was developed to create the sCT treatment plan. A linear prediction model was constructed for comparison by selecting anatomical predictors of past literature. The primary prediction outcome is the mean heart dose (MHD) reduction, and the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated. Moreover, we evaluated the heart and lungs contours' similarity and Hounsfield unit (HU) difference between both images. The median MHD reduction was 1.14 Gy in DIBH plans and 1.09 Gy in sCT plans (P = 0.96). The sCT model achieved better performance than the linear model (R2: 0.972 vs 0.450, RMSE: 0.120 vs 0.551, MAE: 0.087 vs 0.412). The organ contours were similar between DIBH-CT and sCT: the median Dice (DSC) and Jaccard similarity coefficients (JSC) were 0.912 and 0.838 for the heart and 0.910 and 0.834 for the lungs. The HU difference in the soft-tissue region was smaller than in the air or bone. In conclusion, our new model can generate the affected CT by breath-holding, resulting in high performance and well-visualized prediction, which may have many potential uses in radiation oncology.