Reduction In Breast Cancer Mortality Research Articles

Contribution of Mammography in the Screening of Suspicious Breast Cancer Lesions in Congolese Women in Kinshasa

Background: Mammography is a particular mammary imaging technique, an important tool for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of breast disease in general and breast cancer in particular, for which incidence and mortality are well established. Several studies have shown a reduction in breast cancer mortality reaching 40% in women screened by mammography. Thus, the prognosis after treatment is better because of early detection. In the DRC, in developing countries, the mortality rate is high because the diagnosis is late and therefore responsible for a bad prognosis. However, no studies on early detection by mammography have been performed to our knowledge. Our goal was to determine the mammography contribution in suspicious lesions detection of breast cancer in Kinshasa. Method: A retrospective and descriptive study of 1738 mammograms at the Gombe Imaging Center from January 2012 to December 2015. The reports were prepared by radiologists. We re-read approximately 230 images under supervision to complete the missing data related to interpretation. Age, clinical information, breast density (BIRADS type), elemental or associated lesions, and ACR radiological diagnosis were the key parameters collected on an epidemiological data questionnaire and analyzed on the SPSS 20 software.Results: 347 screening mammograms or 20% were performed with an average age of 48.6 years ; 25 of these (7.2%) had mammographic lesions suspected of malignancy, among which 23 were considered in situ. In addition, our study showed that high breast density is a radiologically visible risk factor. Conclusion: This study has shown that mammography is a tool to integrate into cancer screening in our country. Because it allowed to detect suspicious lesions in asymptomatic women.

Abstract P3-03-05: A randomized study assessing interventions to improve comfort during screening mammography

Abstract Background: Although screening mammography leads to an early detection of breast cancer and a reduction in breast cancer mortality, many women have apprehension about mammograms due to reported discomfort and pain [would cite the source]. A study showed that pain was the cause of non-reattendance of screening mammograms in 25-46% of reported cases by women. Despite this, there is limited research on strategies to reduce discomfort and anxiety associated with mammography screening and improve patient experience and compliance with national screening recommendations. Herein, we performed a double-blind randomized clinical study to determine if the use of local analgesia and calming music can improve patient satisfaction during routine screening mammogram. Methods: This study was designed as a double-blind randomized clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. A total of 251 patients who presented for mammographic screening were randomized to receive: breast lidocaine gel at a dose of 1200 mg or placebo gel on both breast and experience calming music or no music Patients with history of mastectomy, breast cancer or recent (within 24 hours) analgesic use were excluded. Pain was measured with a 5-point face pain scale. Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate was used for analysis Results: Of the 251 patients who were randomized between June 2017 and October 2019, 195 self-identified as Hispanics (77%). Median age was 58.5 years old and there were no differences in between groups. 100% were female. 99.3% presented for screening with no concerning symptoms. A total of 126 patients were randomized to music vs 125 to no Music. 79 patients in music group and 51 patients in no music group were randomized to lidocaine. Regarding pain assessment, 18.96% of patients had a pain score of 4 and 5 in the music group randomized to lidocaine gel as opposed to 10.64% to placebo gel. In the non-music group, 17.65% of patients expressed pain score of 4 and 5 to lidocaine gel vs. 18.91% to placebo gel. (P value music: 0.95, P value lidocaine: 0.93 P value music and lidocaine: 1). Patients randomized to lidocaine gel to music reported their prior mammogram to be at a pain score of 4 to 5 in 41.7% of the subjects vs 45% of patients in the no music group. (P value music: 0.45, P value lidocaine: 0.93 P value music and lidocaine: 1). Despite this, majority patients in both groups expressed no reluctance for future mammograms. Conclusion: The addition of calming music and breast lidocaine gel did not show a statistically significant difference in the level of pain perceived by patients getting screening mammography. The data appear to suggest less severe pain (pain score 4 and 5) when these strategies are combined. Further prospective trials with larger patient populations are needed to explore these interventions. Despite the perceived pain most patients were still willing to return for a mammogram the following year. Citation Format: Marcela Mazo-Canola, Heidi C. Ko, Kenneth Kist, Joel Michalek, Lillian Franco, Pamela Otto, Virginia Kaklamani. A randomized study assessing interventions to improve comfort during screening mammography [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-05.

Abstract OT3-20-02: SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial

Abstract Background: Mammographic screening programmes reduce breast cancer mortality, but detect many small tumours with favourable biological features which may not progress during a woman’s lifetime. Screen-detected cancers are treated with standard surgery and adjuvant therapies, with associated morbidities. There is a need to reduce overtreatment of good prognosis tumours and numerous studies have evaluated the omission of radiotherapy in this context. However, there is little evidence to support surgical de-escalation, although percutaneous minimally invasive treatment approaches have been described. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is in widespread use for management of benign lesions and lesions of uncertain malignant potential. SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is designed to determine the feasibility of using this approach for treatment of small invasive tumours detected within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (BSP). Methods: SMALL is a phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing standard surgery with VAE for screen-detected good prognosis cancers. The main eligibility criteria are age ≥47 years, unifocal grade 1 tumours with maximum diameter 15mm, which are strongly ER/PR+ve and HER2-ve, with negative clinical/radiological axillary staging. Patients are randomised 2:1 in favour of VAE or surgery; with no axillary surgery in the VAE arm. Completeness of excision is assessed radiologically, and if excision is incomplete, patients undergo open surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy are mandated in the VAE arm but may be omitted following surgery. Co-primary end-points are: 1. Non-inferiority comparison of the requirement for a second procedure following excision 2. Single arm analysis of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years following VAE Recruitment of 800 patients will permit demonstration of 10% non-inferiority of VAE for requirement of a second procedure. This ensures sufficient patients for single arm analysis of LR rates, where expected LR free survival is 99% at 5 years, with an undesirable survival probability after VAE of 97%. To ensure that the trial as a whole only has 5% alpha, the significance level for each co-primary outcome is set at 2.5% with 90% power. The Data Monitoring Committee will monitor LR events to ensure these do not exceed 3% per year. Secondary outcome measures include time to ipsilateral recurrence, overall survival, complications, quality of life and health economic analysis. A novel feature of SMALL is the integration of a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI), which aims to optimise recruitment to the study. Recruitment challenges are identified by analysing recruiter/patient interviews and audio-recordings of trial discussions, and by review of trial screening logs, eligibility and recruitment data and study documentation. Solutions to address these are developed collaboratively, including individual/group recruiter feedback and recruitment tips documents. Results: SMALL opened in December 2019, but recruitment halted in 2020 for 5 months due to COVID-19. At 7st July 2022, 142 patients had been randomised from 26 centres, with a randomisation rate of approximately 45%, and a per site recruitment rate of 0.4-0.5 patients/month, approaching the feasibility recruitment target of 144 patients. Drawing from preliminary QRI findings and insights from patient representatives, a recruitment tips document has been circulated (on providing balanced information about treatments, encouraging recruiters to engage with patient preferences, and explaining randomisation). Individual recruiter feedback has commenced, with wider feedback delivered across sites via recruitment training workshops. Conclusion: Despite pandemic-related challenges, SMALL has an excellent recruitment rate to date and is expected to have a global impact on treatment of breast cancer within mammographic screening programmes. SMALL is funded by the UK NIHR HTA programme, award 17/42/32 Citation Format: Stuart A. McIntosh, Charlotte E. Coles, David Dodwell, Kenneth Elder, Jessica Foster, Claire Gaunt, Amanda Kirkham, Iain Lyburn, Jenna Morgan, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Sarah E. Pinder, Sarah Pirrie, Shelley Potter, Tracy Roberts, Nisha Sharma, Hilary Stobart, Elizabeth Southgate, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew Wallis, Daniel Rea. SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-20-02.

Abstract P1-06-04: IMPACTS OF TREATMENT DELAY ON BREAST CANCER MORTALITY AND BENEFIT OF TIMELY CARE IN BLACK AND NON-BLACK WOMEN

Abstract BACKGROUND: The impact of treatment delays on cancer outcomes has been well documented, but few published studies explicitly attempt to identify subgroups which would benefit the most from potential interventions improving timeliness of care. Using the state of North Carolina and breast cancer as an example, we sought to quantify race-specific associations between frontline treatment delay and breast cancer mortality, and estimate the potential impact of improvements in timeliness by racial sub-group. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, utilizing multipayer insurance claims linked to cancer registry data from the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, of females diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer from 2004 to 2014. Our exposure of interest was treatment delay, defined as initial cancer directed therapy received ≥ 60 days after diagnosis. Our outcome was death certificate identified breast cancer mortality within 5-years of follow-up. To quantify the association between treatment delay and mortality we estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence limits (CL) where non-breast cancer deaths were treated as competing events. We then simulated the effect of treating all patients within 60 days using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and estimated the potential impact by comparing the simulated data with observed data. Models were adjusted for age and stage at diagnosis, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and modality of first treatment. Models were stratified by race, dichotomized as Black or non-Black, and geographic subregion for evaluation. RESULTS: Our analytic cohort comprised 21,200 patients, of whom 19% were Black. Treatment delays >60 days were twice as frequent among Black compared with non-Black patients (13.5% vs. 6.5%). We found a positive association between treatment delay and breast cancer mortality in the overall cohort (HR=1.3; CL: 1.1, 1.6). The association differed between Black (HR=1.4; CL: 1.1, 1.8) and Non-Black (HR=1.2; CL: 0.9, 1.6) patient subgroups. For both racial groups, the strength of the relationship between treatment delay and mortality varied across geographic subregions. The estimated potential improvement in 5-year cumulative breast cancer mortality from delivering timely care to all patients differed in magnitude across sub-populations. The magnitude of potential improvement in breast cancer mortality at 5 years in the overall analytic cohort was 0.3% (5-year risk of breast cancer mortality in observed cohort: 7.2% vs 6.9% with simulated universal timely treatment). In the Black subcohort, the potential decrease in mortality for timely treatment was 1.0% (observed: 12.3% vs simulated: 11.4%), while in the non-Black population the potential decrease was 0.1% (observed: 6.1% vs simulated: 5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of association between delayed treatment of stage I-III breast cancer and breast cancer mortality differed between Black and non-Black patients, highlighting that interventions to avert treatment delays may have a meaningful impact for this group. Further research is needed to identify factors underlying this difference, which may include a direct effect of differences in timeliness, or downstream differences in the intensity and quality of cancer care beyond the 60-day landmark for delayed patients. Our findings suggest that comprehensive intervention at the state level to improve the timeliness of breast cancer treatment could potentially reduce breast cancer mortality, and that targeting such intervention to patient groups with larger projected benefit, such as Black patients, may be a more efficient use of resources. We have illustrated how a counterfactual approach may be useful in identifying subgroups where focused intervention efforts may yield greater improvements in outcomes. Citation Format: Bradford Jackson, Stephanie Wheeler, Juan Yanguela, Matthew LeBlanc, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Christopher Baggett, Katherine Reeder-Hayes. IMPACTS OF TREATMENT DELAY ON BREAST CANCER MORTALITY AND BENEFIT OF TIMELY CARE IN BLACK AND NON-BLACK WOMEN [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-04.

Determinants of breast cancer screening mammography uptake: Results from Jordan population and family health survey.

Screening for breast cancer utilizing mammography is associated with reduced advanced cancer diagnosis and reduced breast cancer mortality. We aimed to assess the lifetime history of breast cancer screening utilization for Jordanian women aged 40 and 49 years and determinants of this utilization. This paper reports the analyzed data from the seventh cycle of the Jordan Population and Family Health Survey (JPFHS). For this study, the analysis was confined to 4486 women aged between 40 and 49 years at the time of data collection who reported their nationality as Jordanian. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess whether any socio-demographic variables could predict greater breast cancer screening utilization. Only 14% of all respondents aged 40-49 years reported ever having a mammogram. Results of multivariate logistic regression showed that area of residence, husband's level of education, younger age, and living in a wealthy status were strong predictors of lifetime history of breast cancer screening. This study elucidates that breast cancer screening mammography among Jordanian women has remained opportunistic and underutilized despite the efforts of national entities to promote screening and early detection of breast cancer. There is a geographic and social disparity in the utilization of mammography screening among Jordanian women.

Tumour Growth Models of Breast Cancer for Evaluating Early Detection-A Summary and a Simulation Study.

With the advent of nationwide mammography screening programmes, a number of natural history models of breast cancers have been developed and used to assess the effects of screening. The first half of this article provides an overview of a class of these models and describes how they can be used to study latent processes of tumour progression from observational data. The second half of the article describes a simulation study which applies a continuous growth model to illustrate how effects of extending the maximum age of the current Swedish screening programme from 74 to 80 can be evaluated. Compared to no screening, the current and extended programmes reduced breast cancer mortality by 18.5% and 21.7%, respectively. The proportion of screen-detected invasive cancers which were overdiagnosed was estimated to be 1.9% in the current programme and 2.9% in the extended programme. With the help of these breast cancer natural history models, we can better understand the latent processes, and better study the effects of breast cancer screening.

Radiation-Free Microwave Technology for Breast Lesion Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning Model.

Mammography is the gold standard technology for breast screening, which has been demonstrated through different randomized controlled trials to reduce breast cancer mortality. However, mammography has limitations and potential harms, such as the use of ionizing radiation. To overcome the ionizing radiation exposure issues, a novel device (i.e. MammoWave) based on low-power radio-frequency signals has been developed for breast lesion detection. The MammoWave is a microwave device and is under clinical validation phase in several hospitals across Europe. The device transmits non-invasive microwave signals through the breast and accumulates the backscattered (returned) signatures, commonly denoted as the S21 signals in engineering terminology. Backscattered (complex) S21 signals exploit the contrast in dielectric properties of breasts with and without lesions. The proposed research is aimed to automatically segregate these two types of signal responses by applying appropriate supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm for the data emerging from this research. The support vector machine with radial basis function has been employed here. The proposed algorithm has been trained and tested using microwave breast response data collected at one of the clinical validation centres. Statistical evaluation indicates that the proposed ML model can recognise the MammoWave breasts signal with no radiological finding (NF) and with radiological findings (WF), i.e., may be the presence of benign or malignant lesions. A sensitivity of 84.40% and a specificity of 95.50% have been achieved in NF/WF recognition using the proposed ML model.

SNSVM: SqueezeNet-Guided SVM for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Breast cancer is a major public health concern that affects women worldwide. It is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, and early detection is crucial for successful treatment. Unfortunately, breast cancer can often go undetected until it has reached advanced stages, making it more difficult to treat. Therefore, there is a pressing need for accurate and efficient diagnostic tools to detect breast cancer at an early stage. The proposed approach utilizes SqueezeNet with fire modules and complex bypass to extract informative features from mammography images. The extracted features are then utilized to train a support vector machine (SVM) for mammography image classification. The SqueezeNet-guided SVM model, known as SNSVM, achieved promising results, with an accuracy of 94.10% and a sensitivity of 94.30%. A 10-fold cross-validation was performed to ensure the robustness of the results, and the mean and standard deviation of various performance indicators were calculated across multiple runs. This model also outperforms state-of-the-art models in all performance indicators, indicating its superior performance. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach for breast cancer diagnosis using mammography images. The superior performance of the proposed model across all indicators makes it a promising tool for early breast cancer diagnosis. This may have significant implications for reducing breast cancer mortality rates.

Abstract A070: Association between socioeconomic and clinical factors on timely access to care among young Black women with breast cancer

Abstract Background: Young-onset breast cancer is associated with higher mortality due to multiple factors including tumor biology and delayed presentation. Young women with breast cancer with longer treatment delays have decreased survival time, with the impact on survival being more prominent in Black women. The factors contributing to the racial survival disparity are complex and are likely an interplay between tumor biology, genomics, patterns of care and socioeconomic factors. This study looked at socioeconomic and clinical factors that may affect timely access to care for breast cancer in young Black women, and thus impact survival. Methods: Data from the Black Women Etiology and Survival of Triple-negative Breast Cancers (BEST) Study, a population-based cohort of Black women diagnosed with breast cancer ≤ 50 years old between 2009 and 2015 from the Florida and Tennessee State Cancer Registries was used. The time to treatment (in days) was used as the exposure variable and defined as the time from breast cancer diagnosis to the date of first treatment. The primary outcome was determined by distant or local recurrence or death. Pearson chi-square test was conducted to assess the association between clinical and socioeconomic factors with time to treatment. The socioeconomic variables studied were insurance, income and education. Clinical factors evaluated were the stage of breast cancer at diagnosis, hormone subtype, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type of surgery. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were performed to analyze the 10-year overall survival and recurrence rate while adjusting for income, breast cancer stage and hormone subtype. Results: There was a statistically significant association between time to treatment and hormone receptor subtype (p=0.04). More than 60% of women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 57% of women with HER2+ breast cancer received treatment within a month of their breast cancer diagnosis. There was also a significant association between the time to treatment and type of surgery received (p=0.03). 64% of patients who had lumpectomies received treatment in ≤30 days, compared to 54% of patients who had a mastectomy. Survival analysis showed the highest mortality in patients with time to treatment >90 days, followed by patients who received treatment in ≤30 days. The study did not find a statistically significant association between insurance, income, or education on the timeliness of treatment for breast cancer. Conclusion: In our study of young Black women, delayed breast cancer treatment resulted in lower survival. While those with TNBC and HER2+ disease were more likely to receive treatment ≤30 days, i.e. neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess response to chemotherapy and the amount of residual disease at the time of the surgery, the enrichment for aggressive disease is likely the reason for the low survival observed in this group. Timely access to treatment for breast cancer impacts survival and strategies to decrease treatment delays are crucial to reducing breast cancer mortality. Citation Format: Kikelola Oyeleye, Rebecca Lee, Sonya Reid, Tuya Pal, Anne Weidner, Lindsay Venton. Association between socioeconomic and clinical factors on timely access to care among young Black women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A070.

Abstract IA027: DCIS or cancer? Why all the confusion?

Abstract Many women diagnosed with DCIS in the United States report they are confused about their chances of developing an invasive breast cancer or metastatic cancer. They are told that DCIS is not cancer but it holds the possibility of becoming a cancer. Nevertheless, DCIS is treated in much the same way as a small invasive cancer. Surgical options include lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy with radiotherapy, unilateral or bilateral mastectomy. Much of the confusion is generated by the current paradigm that separates DCIS and invasive cancer into distinct conditions. The mortality of DCIS is 3% over 20 years and that prevention of local invasive recurrence post-DCIS does not reduce breast cancer mortality. If the invasive recurrence were the real cancer then preventing it would reduce the risk of dying but this has not been shown. Further, the risk of an invasive in-breast recurrence following DCIS is the same as the risk of an invasive in-breast recurrence following invasive breast cancer. In the Banting database, the 15-year risk of invasive local recurrence following DCIS was 15.6%, following stage I breast cancer was 15.3% and following stage II breast cancer was 15.9%. In the Banting database, the 15-year risk of ipsilateral invasive recurrence was 14% for DCIS patients who receives radiotherapy and was 29% for DCIS patients who did not received radiotherapy – a difference of 15%. In the Banting database, the 15-year risk of ipsilateral invasive recurrence was 14% for Stage I/II patients who received radiotherapy and was 27% for Stage I/II patients who did not receive radiotherapy – a difference of 13%. The benefit of radiotherapy is the same in both groups. Similarly, the benefit of unilateral mastectomy versus lumpectomy on preventing local invasive recurrence is the same for DCIS patients as it is for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients. In our SEER-based analysis of 812,851 women with breast cancer, the 25-year actuarial risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer was 10.1% for patients with DCIS and was 9.9% for patients with invasive breast cancer. Based on this finding, the benefit of performing a contralateral mastectomy at the time of diagnosis is the same for both groups. We accept lumpectomy as standard of care for invasive breast cancer even though the risk of invasive ipsilateral recurrence is much higher after lumpectomy than after mastectomy. We consider contralateral mastectomy as an option for women with invasive cancer, but as overtreatment for women with DCIS even though the risk of contralateral breast cancer is almost exactly the same. The benefit of radiotherapy is the same for patients with DCIS and stage I/II breast cancer, but we are more likely to consider it overtreatment for DCIS patients. Much of the confusion can be resolved if we consider both types of cancer to be different points on the spectrum. Breast cancer is heterogeneous; DCIS is one end of the spectrum. Accepting this fact will make the rationale behind treatment decisions easier to explain. Citation Format: Steven A. Narod. DCIS or cancer? Why all the confusion? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Rethinking DCIS: An Opportunity for Prevention?; 2022 Sep 8-11; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2022;15(12 Suppl_1): Abstract nr IA027.

Thermography as a Breast Cancer Screening Technique: A Review Article.

Globally, breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer in women and is the reason for more disability-adjusted life years lost than any other type of cancer. Hence, early screening plays a vital role in reducing breast cancer mortality. Although mammography is the standard procedure used for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer, it still has some limitations. Other methods used for screening include ultrasound and clinical breast examination. Despite its limitations, mammography is the gold standard for screening breast malignancy. Another emerging method for screening is thermography. With recent technological advances, breast cancer screening through thermography has demonstrated several advantages over existing modalities. For this review, a literature search was performed using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. The keywords searched included breast cancer, early detection, breast cancer screening, mammography, and thermography. This review discusses the benefits of thermography showing that it can be a significant modality for breast cancer screening. The recent developments in thermal sensors, imaging protocols, and computer-aided software diagnostics hold great promise for making this technique a mainstream screening method for cancer. Moreover, the use of artificial intelligence and thermal imaging to detect early-stage breast cancer can provide impressive results. Therefore, thermography will be a promising technology for the early detection of breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Screening: Is There Room for De-escalation?

Breast cancer screening is highly controversial and different agencies have widely varying guidelines. Yet it is currently used extensively in the USA and frequently the thought is "the more, the better." The purpose of this review is to objectively assess the risks and benefits of screening mammography and consider whether there may be areas where it could be de-escalated. Over the past few years, there have been several meta-analyses that are concordant, and it is now agreed that the main benefit of screening mammography is about a 20% reduction in breast cancer mortality. This actually benefits about 5% of patients with mammographically detected tumors. We now appreciate that the main harm of screening is overdiagnosis, i.e. detection of a cancer that will not cause the patient any harm and would not have ever been detected without the screening. This currently represents about 20 to 30% of screening detected cancers. Finding extra cancers with more intense screening is not always good, because in this situation, the risk of overdiagnosis increases and the benefit decreases. In some groups, the risk of overdiagnosis approaches 75%. Our goal should be not only to find more cancers, but to avoid finding cancers that would never have caused the patient any harm and lead to unnecessary treatment. The authors suggest some situations where it may be reasonable to de-escalate screening.

Factors associated with breast cancer mammography screening and breast self-examination in Irish women: results from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Background BreastCheck is Ireland’s breast screening service which offers biennial mammograms to women aged 50–69. Practicing regular breast self-examination (BSE) enhances women’s awareness and increases their perception of their susceptibility to the risk of breast cancer, possibly increasing their likelihood of attending a screening programme which reduces breast cancer mortality. Research is needed to identify the promotors and barriers to both attending breast cancer screening and practicing BSE. Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the promotors and barriers associated with attending breast cancer screening and practicing BSE in Irish women. Materials and Methods Data from the participants of TILDA wave 3 (2014–2015) was used, the participant population included females only (≥50 years old), a total of 3575 women. Bivariate analysis was used to identify variables that were significantly associated with having had a mammogram since the last interview (wave 2) or regularly checking their breasts for lumps (BSE). Regression analysis was then used to determine the effect the significant variables had on predicting the likelihood of participants attending breast screening or practicing BSE. Results Over half (55%) of all women over the age of 50 had a mammogram since wave 2 was completed (2012) and two thirds reported practicing regular BSE. The factors associated with having attended for breast cancer screening were: having private health insurance (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.45–2.380), and practicing BSE (OR = 1.683, 95%CI = 1.344–2.107). The factors found to be associated with practicing regular BSE were: higher quality of life (OR = 1.035, 95%CI = 1.015–1.057), higher BMI (OR = 1.118, 95%CI = 1.020–1.226), being married (OR = 1.436, 95%CI = 1.190–1.732) and attending mammogram screening (OR = 1.691, 95%CI = 1.353–2.114). Conclusion Regular participation in mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality. Women eligible for BreastCheck were significantly more likely to attend screening. BSE is associated with increased attendance at screening. Health-care professionals should encourage BSE in order to increase screening uptake.

Effectiveness of Mammography Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality - A Study Protocol for Emulation of Target Trials Using German Health Claims Data.

The efficacy of mammography screening in reducing breast cancer mortality has been demonstrated in randomized trials. However, treatment options - and hence prognosis - for advanced tumor stages as well as mammography techniques have considerably improved since completion of these trials. Consequently, the effectiveness of mammography screening under current conditions is unclear and controversial. The German mammography screening program (MSP), an organized population-based screening program, was gradually introduced between 2005 and 2008 and achieved nation-wide coverage in 2009. We describe in detail a study protocol for investigating the effectiveness of the German MSP in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 to 69 years based on health claims data. Specifically, the proposed study aims at estimating per-protocol effects of several screening strategies on cumulative breast cancer mortality. The first analysis will be conducted once 10-year follow-up data are available. We will use claims data from five statutory health insurance providers in Germany, covering approximately 37.6 million individuals. To estimate the effectiveness of the MSP, hypothetical target trials will be emulated across time, an approach that has been demonstrated to minimize design-related biases. Specifically, the primary contrast will be in terms of the cumulative breast cancer mortality comparing the screening strategies of "never screen" versus "regular screening as intended by the MSP". In Germany, the utilization of data from health insurances for scientific research is regulated by the Code of Social Law. All involved health insurance providers as well as the responsible authorities approved the use of the health claims data for this study. The Ethics Committee of the University of Bremen determined that studies based on claims data are exempt from institutional review. The findings of the proposed study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Health Care Accessibility and Breast Cancer Mortality in Europe.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cause of death, due to malignant neoplasms in women worldwide. The nature of the symptoms associated with breast cancer depends on the stage of the disease. In this case, any cancerous changes in the initial phase of the disease can only be detected during imaging tests. Participation in mammography screening can reduce breast cancer mortality by up to 40%, if only 70% of the eligible population participates in preventive programs. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of accessibility to health care resources on breast cancer mortality. Methods: Eurostat aggregated health care data was extracted. Hierarchical cluster analysis of average breast cancer mortality identified four groups of countries with similar mortality rates and trends. The data was then analyzed, in terms of access to health care. Results: It was observed that the higher the financial expenditure on health care and the better the health care accessibility, the lower the mortality rates of breast cancer. Conclusions: There are examples indicating that the studied elements are not the only factors affecting the improvement of population health. The authors would like to emphasize the need to influence lifestyle factors, direct cancer risk, and introduce a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer prevention.

10-year opportunistic mammographic screening scenario in Brazil and its impact on breast cancer early detection: a nationwide population-based study.

BackgroundMammographic screening has been used to reduce breast cancer mortality worldwide and remains the main modality for the early detection of this disease. Women from low- and middle-income countries still lack access to periodic mammograms and efficient health care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore opportunistic mammographic coverage in Brazil, while considering the privately insured population and its association with early breast cancer (EBC) detection.MethodsData on population, gross domestic product (GDP), number of mammograms performed under the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) public health system or private system, and women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer from 2010 to 2019 were retrieved from publicly available databases.ResultsA total of 39 555 636 mammograms with an average of 3 955 564 ± 395 704 mammograms were obtained per year from 2010 to 2019 in Brazil. Most examinations (58.6%) were performed in the target population (50-69 years old), while 32% were performed in women aged 40-49, and 9.4% were performed in women <40 years or >70 years of age. The 10-year mammogram coverage was 30.6% in the target population and 24.8% in the population aged 40-49 years, with significant variation across states and municipalities. The overall EBC detection rates in Brazil were 30.6% in populations aged 50-70 and 24.8% in those aged 40-50 years. We observed a positive correlation between coverage and EBC detection rate (r = 0.68; P = 0.0001 (50-70 years) and r = 0.75; P < 0.0001 (40-50 years)). According to the GDP, the municipalities with higher GDP per capita had higher mammogram coverage (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe coverage of mammographic screening for women under the SUS is far below the international guidelines. Additionally, a significant number of mammograms have been performed in non-target populations. This scenario reflects the problematic screening programs in developing countries and reflects low rates of EBC diagnosis. As Brazil is a continental country with heterogeneous socioeconomic indicators, we observed significant variations in the number of mammograms performed by age groups when separated by states and municipalities. Even when considering supplemental health system coverage, municipalities with higher GDP per capita were associated with higher mammogram coverage.

Coverage rate of opportunistic and organised breast cancer screening in France: Department-level estimation

ObjectiveIn France, the national breast cancer screening programme (NBCSP), targeting women aged 50–74 years was rolled out nationwide in 2004. It aims at reducing breast cancer mortality. In addition to the NBCSP, the use of opportunistic screening is permitted in France. The objective of this study is to estimate both opportunistic use and overall coverage rates of breast cancer screening, among women 40–84 years of age, in France. MethodsThe French medico-administrative health data system (SNDS) was used to identify women performing an opportunistic or organised mammography screening in France in 2016–2017. ResultsThe two-yearly opportunistic mammography screening is 18 % among women aged 40–84; it is 11 % among women aged 50–74, i.e., the target age range for organised screening, 36 % among women aged 40–49 and 13 % among women aged 75–84. The overall two-yearly screening coverage is 48 % for all women aged 40–84; it is 60 % among women aged 50–74, 36 % among women 40–49 and 16 % for those aged 75–84. Geographical variations in screening are lessened when the two screening strategies are considered, as they balance each other. ConclusionAlthough coverage in the NBCSP is around 50 % in France, more than one third of the women make use of opportunistic screening within and outside the target age range. Organized screening appears to improve equity of access to mammography screening service. The lack of data on opportunistic screening practices hinders the evaluation of French screening practices as a whole.

Imaging Surveillance Options for Individuals With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for breast cancer survivors on the basis of observational studies and meta-analyses showing reduced breast cancer mortality and improved quality of life. However, breast cancer survivors are at higher risk of subsequent breast cancer and have a fourfold increased risk of interval breast cancers compared with individuals without a personal history of breast cancer. Supplemental surveillance modalities offer increased cancer detection compared with mammography alone, but utilization is variable, and benefits must be balanced with possible harms of false-positive findings. In this review, we describe the current state of mammographic surveillance, summarize evidence for supplemental surveillance in breast cancer survivors, and explore a risk-based approach to selecting surveillance imaging strategies. Further research identifying predictors associated with increased risk of interval second breast cancers and development of validated risk prediction tools may help physicians and patients weigh the benefits and harms of surveillance breast imaging and decide on a personalized approach to surveillance for improved breast cancer outcomes.

Effectiveness of mammography screening for women aged 40–49

The aim of the work was to review randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy of screening mammography in women aged 40–49 years.Google Scholar and PubMed databases were searched for English-language publications for randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the possible benefit/harm of mammographic screening in women 40–49 years old, a follow-up period of at least 10 years, primary breast cancer, regarding as primary outcomes reduction of breast cancer mortality, and side effects screening mammography.A search for the specified keywords found 2453 sources in electronic databases, of which only 83 studies were published as articles. After analyzing these studies, only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. An analysis of these studies according to the inclusion criteria is subsequently presented in the article.Based on the available data from randomized trials, no definitive conclusion about the effectiveness of mammographic screening in women 40–49 years of age can yet be drawn. Therefore, it is too early to draw a line in the debate about the appropriateness of mammography in the 40–49 age group.

173P A deep learning model to predict competing cancer and cardiac risks after anthracycline exposure for early breast cancer

Clinical trials have demonstrated that anthracycline chemotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) reduces breast cancer mortality but increases cardiac risk. Attempts to quantify this risk in routine care have been limited by short follow up and inability to adjust for confounding factors and competing risks. The aim of this study was to implement a deep learning framework to quantify excess cardiac risk from anthracycline chemotherapy in real-world care.