Reduce Asthma Exacerbations Research Articles

Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5R biologics for severe asthma. Are there any differences in their effects?

Objective The aim of this retrospective multicentre study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα therapies and to compare their effectiveness. Methods We collected and analysed results separately for anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies from January 2016 until December 2021 in multidisciplinary severe asthma units. We collected demographic and clinical data, treatment with previous anti-IgE and/or anti-IL-5 agents, and comorbidities. We compared the number of exacerbations and admissions to the hospital, daily oral corticosteroid intake, pulmonary function tests, and Asthma Control Test scores before and after 12 months of therapy. 261 patients were included: 176 patients in the anti-IL-5 group and 85 in the anti-IL-5Rα group. Results Both groups led to statistically significant reductions in asthma exacerbations, hospital admissions, and visits to the Emergency Room. Although both groups showed a significant reduction in blood eosinophiliccount, we found a difference, although not significant, in the magnitude of reduction as benralizumab was able to decrease eosinophil counts to zero. Patients in the anti-IL-5 group achieved higher ACT scores after treatment, although this improvement was seen in both treatment groups. Conclusion The anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα biologics have shown similar effectiveness despite having different mechanisms of action. The anti-IL-5 group appeared to be better than benralizumab at improving ACT scores and FEV1/FVC and at reducing the number of inhalers. Although these differences were not statistically significant, it is not clear whether they may have clinical relevance and they might highlight the need for further head-to-head studies comparing these treatments.

Mepolizumab in children and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma not eligible for omalizumab: a single Center experience

Background Mepolizumab is an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody shown to reduce asthma exacerbations in adults and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma. Aim To assess the impact of mepolizumab on children and adolescents over 12 months by examining steroid usage, asthma-related hospitalizations, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration (FeNO), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), mid expiratory flow (FEF25–75%), and blood eosinophil count. Methods Retrospective analysis performed between October 2015 and December 2022. Data was reviewed 12 months before and after commencing mepolizumab. Mepolizumab was offered if the patient had severe eosinophilic asthma and were unresponsive to or ineligible for omalizumab. Results Sixteen participants (age 7–17, 8 males, 8 females) received subcutaneous mepolizumab monthly with no serious adverse reactions. Incidence of hospital admissions fell significantly (IRR 0.33, p = 0.007). Among the 11 patients receiving daily oral corticosteroids, 3 were weaned off daily oral steroids and 3 patients’ daily dose was significantly reduced (mean Δ-0.095 ± 0.071 mg/kg, p = 0.0012). Eosinophil count was decreased (mean Δ-0.85 x 109/L, p < 0.001). There was no significant change in mean overall steroid burden per patient (mean Δ-1445.63 ± 1603.18 mg, p = 0.10), ACT scores (mean Δ2.88 ± 6.71, p = 0.17), FEV1 z-scores (mean Δ-0.99 ± 1.88, p = 0.053), FEF25–75% z-scores (mean Δ-0.65 ± 1.61, p = 0.13), FeNO (mean Δ-20.09 ± 80.86, p = 0.34), or number of courses of oral steroids given for asthma attacks (IRR 0.71, p = 0.09). Conclusion Among children and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma ineligible for or not responsive to omalizumab, mepolizumab therapy exhibited significant reduction in rate of asthma-related hospitalizations and significant decrease in daily steroid dosage.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Type 2-High Severe Asthma

Asthma is a common and heterogeneous disease whose treatment has considerably changed over the last decades. While inhaled therapies based on inhaled corticosteroids and long acting β2 agonists are effective in controlling asthma in the majority of patients, about 5% of asthmatics poorly respond to inhaled steroids or inhaled steroids/long acting β2 agonists combinations. These patients are affected by “severe asthma”, which is associated with need of oral corticosteroids, progression of the disease, increased use of healthcare services, deterioration of quality of life, and a significant economic burden on society. Asthma is no longer considered a single disease, but a respiratory syndrome with complex biological network of distinct and interrelating inflammatory and remodeling pathways (endotypes) that are associated with different clinical manifestations (phenotypes) both in the lungs (asthma) and other organs (e.g. nose and skin). Severe asthma endotypes may be broadly regarded as Type 2-high and Type 2-low, a model that has become central to asthma management with the development of novel treatments for the Type 2-high endotypes. The hallmark feature of Type 2-high asthma is eosinophilic inflammation, often associated with increased serum IgE, increased exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophilia. The discovery of the main key drivers of Type 2-high inflammation (IgE, cytokines such as interleukin IL-5, -4 and -13) enabled the development of new biological agents directed towards specific molecular targets. These advances have shifted the existing paradigm “one drug fits all” to “patient-tailored” novel therapies. The monoclonal antibodies direct to IgE (omalizumab), IL-5 and IL-5 receptor (mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab), and to the α chain of the IL-4 and IL-13 combined receptor (dupilumab), and more recently, to the thymic stromal lymphopoietin (tezepelumab) have been shown in both clinical trials and real-life studies to control symptoms, reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function in severe asthmatics not controlled by full inhalation therapies. More recently, the Single Inhaler Triple Therapy (SITT) containing inhaled steroids, long acting β2 agonists and muscarinic antagonists has been developed, slightly improving the effectiveness/safety of the inhalation therapy. This report aims to review available therapeutic opportunities for patients with severe asthma focusing on patients with Type 2-high severe asthma and how to position these new therapeutic alternatives in clinical practice.

Personalized Medicine in Severe Asthma: From Biomarkers to Biologics.

Severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous clinical condition presented as chronic inflammation of the airways. Conventional treatments are mainly focused on symptom control; however, there has been a shift towards personalized medicine. Identification of different phenotypes driven by complex pathobiological mechanisms (endotypes), especially those driven by type-2 (T2) inflammation, has led to improved treatment outcomes. Combining biomarkers with T2-targeting monoclonal antibodies is crucial for developing personalized treatment strategies. Several biological agents, including anti-immunoglobulin E, anti-interleukin-5, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin/interleukin-4, have been approved for the treatment of severe asthma. These biological therapies have demonstrated efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations, lowering eosinophil count, improving lung function, diminishing oral corticosteroid use, and improving the quality of life in selected patients. Severe asthma management is undergoing a profound transformation with the introduction of ongoing and future biological therapies. The availability of novel treatment options has facilitated the adoption of phenotype/endotype-specific approaches and disappearance of generic interventions. The transition towards precision medicine plays a crucial role in meticulously addressing the individual traits of asthma pathobiology. An era of tailored strategies has emerged, allowing for the successful targeting of immune-inflammatory responses that underlie uncontrolled T2-high asthma. These personalized approaches hold great promise for improving the overall efficacy and outcomes in the management of severe asthma. This article comprehensively reviews currently available biological agents and biomarkers for treating severe asthma. With the expanding repertoire of therapeutic options, it is becoming increasingly crucial to comprehend the influencing factors, understand the pathogenesis, and track treatment progress in severe asthma.

Impact of dupilumab across seasons in patients with type 2, uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma

BackgroundSeasonal variability could influence asthma exacerbations. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the 52-week QUEST study (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab every 2 weeks vs placebo significantly reduced exacerbations and improved prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. TRAVERSE (NCT02134028), the open-label QUEST extension study, enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe asthma to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab, including patients who previously received placebo that initiated dupilumab therapy. ObjectiveTo investigate long-term dupilumab efficacy in reducing exacerbations across yearly seasons in patients with type 2 inflammatory asthma with and without clinical evidence of allergic asthma. MethodsUnadjusted annualized exacerbation rate and proportions of patients experiencing severe asthma exacerbations are reported by month and season and for both hemispheres. ResultsThe proportion of patients with type 2 asthma experiencing 1 or more severe asthma exacerbations during QUEST was 20.8% vs 10.0% in spring, 18.2% vs 7.3% in summer, 22.2% vs 12.6% in autumn, and 26.4% vs 12.0% in winter, for placebo- vs dupilumab-treated patients, respectively; P was less than .001 for placebo vs dupilumab in all seasons. Reductions in the proportion of patients experiencing severe exacerbations across seasons in subgroups with and without evidence of allergic asthma were similar to the overall type 2 population. Reductions in severe exacerbations observed during QUEST were sustained during TRAVERSE, up to 96 weeks across both hemispheres. ConclusionDupilumab reduced asthma exacerbations, with no difference in the reduction between seasons, in patients with type 2 inflammation, with and without evidence of allergic asthma. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02414854, NCT02134028.

Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in patients with asthma: Findings from the US ADVANTAGE study

BackgroundDupilumab is approved as an add-on maintenance therapy for patients (≥6 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma. Better understanding of real-world effectiveness is needed. ObjectiveTo characterize the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in asthma management. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients (≥12 years of age) diagnosed with asthma, initiating dupilumab between November 2018 and September 2020. The study used a US electronic medical record database (TriNetX Dataworks, Cambridge, Massachusetts). Asthma exacerbation rates before and after the initiation of dupilumab were analyzed using generalized estimating equations models with Poisson probabilistic link to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on previous exacerbation data, eosinophil levels, history of atopic dermatitis or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, previous use of biologics, and presence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). ResultsA total of 2400 patients initiating dupilumab met all study criteria. After initiation of dupilumab, risk of asthma exacerbation was reduced by 44% (IRR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.57; P = <0.0001) and systemic corticosteroid prescriptions by 48% (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48, 0.56; P = <0.0001) compared with those before initiation of dupilumab. Adjustment for COVID-19 showed a greater reduction in asthma exacerbations (IRR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.55; P = <0.0001). ConclusionCurrent real-world efficacy evidence indicates that dupilumab reduces asthma exacerbations and total systemic corticosteroid prescriptions in clinical practice. The effectiveness of dupilumab was observed independent of exacerbation history, eosinophil levels, or COVID-19 impact.

Comprehensive Observational Study in a Large Cohort of Asthma Patients after Adding LAMA to ICS/LABA.

Adding LAMA to LABA/ICS is recommended to improve control in patients with persistent asthma. This observational, retrospective, before-and-after study considered patients diagnosed with asthma who started LABA/ICS + LAMA treatment (triple therapy, TT) between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 and had been treated with LABA/ICS (dual therapy, DT) in the year before. Changes in lung function and exacerbation rates, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (€2019) were estimated in patients with asthma in clinical practices in Spain. Data from computerized medical records from seven Spanish regions were collected ±1 year of LAMA addition. 4740 patients (64.1 years old [SD: 16.3]) were included. TT reduced the incidence of exacerbations by 16.7% (p < 0.044) and the number of patients with exacerbations by 8.5% (p < 0.001) compared to previous DT. The rate of patients with severe exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids and their hospitalization rates significantly decreased by 22.5% and 29.5%. TT significantly improved FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC, saving €571/patient for society. Younger patients with asthma (18-44 years old) and patients with severe asthma (FEV1 < 60%) performed better upon the initiation of TT. TT reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function and reduced healthcare costs vs. DT, particularly in patients requiring systemic corticosteroids to treat severe exacerbations.

Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data.

There is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo. Of the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19-0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35-1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control. Uncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on asthma exacerbations in New Zealand: An interrupted time series analysis.

New Zealand (NZ) implemented some of the strictest restrictions during the novel coronavirus pandemic (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). How this impacted asthma exacerbation rates in NZ is unknown. We sought to explore the effects of the COVID-19 restrictions on asthma exacerbations in NZ during 2020. We used a population-based, interrupted time series to examine the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in NZ on asthma exacerbation rate. The primary outcome measure was change in the monthly exacerbation rate, defined as hospitalization and/or course of corticosteroids, before and after the first lockdown. In a secondary analysis, we quantified the number of patients with asthma, the actual asthma exacerbation rate from March to December 2019 versus March to December 2020, and the number of asthma hospitalizations. There was a significant drop in the exacerbation rate immediately after lockdown (-3.02; P< .0001) followed by a significant and sustained increasing trend; the rate postlockdown increased relative to that prelockdown (0.27; P< .0001). Similar patterns were observed in all sociodemographic groups. In our secondary analysis, we identified 507,622 people with asthma; this reduced to 458,023 in 2020 postlockdown. The overall asthma exacerbation rate was 33.3% less in 2020 than in 2019 (reduction from 48.6/1000 patients to 32.4/1000 patients). The rate of asthma hospitalizations decreased from 9.5 per 1000 patients in 2019 to 6.2 per 1000 patients in 2020; this decrease was observed across all demographic groups. The first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in NZ significantly reduced asthma exacerbation rates across all sociodemographic groups. Whether these reductions are sustained requires further investigation.

Reduced Asthma Exacerbations in Adult Patients Treated With Bronchial Thermoplasty.

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials of patients with severe asthma who failed to achieve disease control with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with bronchodilators. However, the effectiveness of BT in real-world clinical settings, especially among the Asian population, has not been determined. To evaluate the effectiveness of BT using a nationwide database. Using the inpatient and outpatient data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we applied a self-controlled case series design to evaluate changes in the composite outcome of hospital admissions and emergency department visits, as well as systemic corticosteroid dose, between 1 year before and after BT. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on patients' profiles. Among the 561 patients with asthma who underwent BT treatment between September 2014 and March 2020, 102 patients with at least 1 outcome were analyzed. Bronchial thermoplasty was significantly associated with an improvement in the composite outcome of hospital admission and emergency department visits (incidence rate ratio 0.53; 95% CI 0.44-0.64). Systemic corticosteroid use was reduced after BT sessions (1931.5 mg [1,341.2-3,725.3 mg] to 641.3 mg [134.2-1,691.1 mg] per person-year; P < .001). Although all groups showed a significant improvement in the composite outcome in the subgroup analyses, BT tended to be less effective among people older than 65 years and those with higher body mass index (>25 kg/m2). The present study using real-world data suggests that BT may improve asthma control; however, the effectiveness of BT can vary depending on patient baseline profiles.

Ozone Pollution and Acute Exacerbation of Asthma in Residents of China: An Ecological Study.

The evidence for a causal relationship between high-level ozone (O3) exposure and acute exacerbation of asthma among adults is limited, and the conclusions are less definitive. Here we collected the daily data on asthma cases, O3 exposure, and meteorological factors from 2010 to 2016 in Shijiazhuang, China. We investigated the risk of asthma exacerbation associated with high-level ozone exposure using a polynomial distributed lag model (PDLM). Using a generalized additive model (GAM), we estimated the interactive effects between O3 and other pollutants as well as meteorological factors on asthma exacerbation. A total of 7270 patients with asthma were enrolled from 22 governmental hospitals in 13 counties. Each 10 μg/m3 increase in O3 concentration on the exacerbation of asthma was associated with a 1.92% (95% CI = 0.80-3.03%) higher risk of asthma exacerbation on day lag 7. The cumulative risk of O3 on asthma exacerbation increased by 18.9% (95% CI = 12.8-25.4%) on the 14th day. High consecutive levels of O3 increase the risk of asthma exacerbation, and the interactive effect of O3 and sulfur dioxide (SO2) appears before the exacerbation onset. These findings suggested that O3 should be an important risk factor for asthma exacerbation, and health benefits in reducing asthma exacerbation risk would be gained with continued efforts to improve the air quality in China.

Time effect of dupilumab to treat severe uncontrolled asthma in adolescents: A pilot study.

Dupilumab is a new biological drug approved for the treatment of type 2 inflammatory diseases, such as asthma. Dupilumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that acts against both interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 receptors. This study evaluated the time--dependent effect of dupilumab on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adolescents with uncontrolled severe asthma. Five adolescents suffering from uncontrolled severe asthma and treated with dupilumab were recruited. All subjects were evaluated for 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the first dose of dupilumab. Outcome measures included lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, asthma control and quality of life assessed by validated questionnaires (Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire). The quality of life improved quickly after 4 weeks of treatment and 80% of adolescents halved the dose of inhaled corticosteroids necessary to control asthma symptoms. These results were still maintained for 24 weeks after start of the therapy. None of the patients had any asthma exacerbation during the study period. Results of this study demonstrated that dupilumab was quickly effective to reduce asthma exacerbation and ameliorate quality of life in severe asthmatic adolescents.

Association of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Rationale: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) have worse clinical outcomes compared with patients without metabolic dysregulation. GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce asthma exacerbation risk and improve FVC in patients with COPD. Objectives: To determine whether GLP-1RA use is associated with reduced COPD exacerbation rates, and severe and moderate exacerbation risk, compared with other T2D therapies. Methods: A retrospective, observational, electronic health records-based study was conducted using an active comparator, new-user design of 1,642 patients with COPD in a U.S. health system from 2012 to 2022. The COPD cohort was identified using a previously validated machine learning algorithm that includes a natural language processing tool. Exposures were defined as prescriptions for GLP-1RAs (reference group), DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4) inhibitors (DPP-4is), SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors, or sulfonylureas. Measurements and Main Results: Unadjusted COPD exacerbation counts were lower in GLP-1RA users. Adjusted exacerbation rates were significantly higher in DPP-4i (incidence rate ratio, 1.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.04]; P = 0.02) and sulfonylurea (incidence rate ratio, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.69]; P < 0.0001) users compared with GLP-1RA users. GLP-1RA use was also associated with significantly reduced risk of severe exacerbations compared with DPP-4i and sulfonylurea use, and of moderate exacerbations compared with sulfonylurea use. After adjustment for clinical covariates, moderate exacerbation risk was also lower in GLP-1RA users compared with DPP-4i users. No statistically significant difference in exacerbation outcomes was seen between GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor users. Conclusions: Prospective studies of COPD exacerbations in patients with comorbid T2D are warranted. Additional research may elucidate the mechanisms underlying these observed associations with T2D medications.

Effect of monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) alone or in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) using electronic methods on asthma outcomes: a narrative systematic review

ObjectivesTo evaluate through a systematic review the effectiveness of electronic methods in monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone or in combination with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and their effect...

Triple Therapy with Mometasone/Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium or Doubling the ICS/LABA Dose in GINA Step 4: IRIDIUM Analyses.

GINA guidelines recommend increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a step-up option for patients with inadequately controlled asthma at GINA step 4 [inadequately controlled asthma on medium-dose ICS/long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)]. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) add-on to medium-dose ICS/LABA in patients at GINA 2022 step 4. This post hoc analysis of the IRIDIUM study evaluated the change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume (FEV1 ) in patients receiving medium-dose MF/IND/GLY versus high-dose MF/IND and high-dose FLU/SAL at Week 26. Other outcomes included improvement in lung functions [peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the FVC (FEF)25-75%)], asthma control [Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7)], responder analysis (≥0.5 unit improvement in ACQ-7), and reduction inasthma exacerbations at Weeks 26 and 52. A total of 1930 patients were included in this analysis. Medium-dose MF/IND/GLY improved trough FEV1 versus high-dose MF/IND (Δ 41mL; 95% CI -7-90) and high-dose FLU/SAL (Δ 88mL; 95% CI 39-137) at Week 26 which were sustained until Week 52. Exacerbation rates were 16% lower with medium-dose MF/IND/GLY versus high-dose MF/IND for all (mild, moderate, and severe) exacerbations and 21-30% lower versus high-dose FLU/SAL for all (mild, moderate, and severe), moderate or severe, and severe exacerbations over 52weeks. Further improvements in other lung functions were observed with medium-dose MF/IND/GLY. No new safety signals were identified. Medium-dose MF/IND/GLY improved lung function and reduced asthma exacerbations compared to high-dose ICS/LABA and may be an undervalued option in patients at GINA 2022 step 4. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02571777.

Impact of benralizumab on asthma exacerbation-related medical healthcare resource utilization and medical costs: results from the ZEPHYR 2 study

Background and AimBenralizumab is a biologic add-on treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma that can reduce the rate of asthma exacerbations, but data on the associated medical utilization are scarce. This retrospective study evaluated the economic value of benralizumab by analyzing healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in a large patient population in the US.MethodsInsurance claims data (11/2016–6/2020) were analyzed. A pre-post design was used to compare asthma exacerbation rates, medical HRU and medical costs in the 12 months pre vs. post index (day after benralizumab initiation). Patients were aged ≥12 years, with ≥2 records of benralizumab and ≥2 asthma exacerbations pre index, and constituted non-mutually exclusive cohorts: biologic-naïve, biologic-experienced (switched from omalizumab or mepolizumab to benralizumab), or with extended follow-up (18 or 24 months).ResultsIn all cohorts (mean age 51–53 years; 67–70% female; biologic-naïve, N = 1,292; biologic-experienced, N = 349; 18-month follow-up, N = 419; 24-month follow-up, N = 156), benralizumab treatment reduced the rate of asthma exacerbation by 53–68% (p < .001). In the biologic-naïve cohort, inpatient admissions decreased by 58%, emergency department visits by 54%, and outpatient visits by 58% post index (all p < .001), with similar reductions in exacerbation-related medical HRU in other cohorts. Exacerbation-related mean total medical costs decreased by 51% in the biologic-naïve cohort ($4691 pre-index, $2289 post-index), with cost differences ranging from 16% to 64% across other cohorts (prior omalizumab: $2686 to $1600; prior mepolizumab: $5990 to $5008; 18-month: $3636 to $1667; 24-month: $4014 to $1449; all p < .001). Medical HRU and cost reductions were durable, decreasing by 64% in year 1 and 66% in year 2 in the 24 month follow-up cohort.ConclusionPatients treated with benralizumab with prior exacerbations experienced reductions in asthma exacerbations and exacerbation-related medical HRU and medical costs regardless of prior biologic use, with the benefits observed for up to 24 months after treatment initiation.

Severe asthma clinical remission after biologic treatment with anti-IL4/IL13: A real-life experience

IntroductionDupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4/interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in many aspects of Type-2 severe asthma management. Currently, we lack real-life studies addressing the achievment of clinical remission in patients treated with this biologic. Materials and methodsWe performed a prospective study enrolling 18 patients with severe asthma treated with Dupilumab. We assessed main clinical, functional and biological severe asthma features at baseline (T0) and after a 1-year course of treatment (T12). Clinical remission was defined at T12 in patients without asthma exacerbations, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, ACT ≥ 20 and FEV1 improvement ≥ 100 ml from baseline. ResultsAmong total population, 38.9% of patients achieved clinical remission at T12. Anti IL-4/IL-13 treatment significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and OCS use in the overall cohort, with a more pronounced ACT improvement in the remission group. Patients achieving clinical remission went through a step down of the inhalation therapy, suspending long-acting anti-muscarinics administration at T12. ConclusionsTreatment with anti-IL4/IL13 can induce clinical remission in patients with T2 severe asthma.

Effect of Immunotherapy on Patients with Bronchial Asthma

Immunotherapy, also known as allergen-specific immunotherapy or desensitization, involves gradually increasing doses of specific allergens to induce immune tolerance and modify the allergic response. The therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, reduce medication usage, and potentially modify the underlying disease process. Several studies have investigated the effects of immunotherapy on asthma patients, providing insights into its clinical efficacy and safety. Research studies have shown positive outcomes of immunotherapy in bronchial asthma. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant improvements in asthma symptoms, decreased medication use, and reduced airway hyperresponsiveness in patients who received subcutaneous immunotherapy compared to the placebo group. Another study focusing on children showed improvements in lung function and reduced asthma exacerbations with sublingual immunotherapy. Long-term effects of immunotherapy were explored in a prospective cohort study on adults with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma. The study found sustained improvements in asthma control, reduced rescue medication use, and a de

Efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with inadequately controlled asthma with respect to baseline eosinophil count: Post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study

BackgroundBaseline characteristics could potentially guide asthma treatments. We evaluated whether baseline eosinophil levels affect the efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. MethodIn this post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study, efficacy of high-dose MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg, once-daily [o.d.]) versus high-dose MF/IND (320/150 μg o.d.) and high-dose fluticasone/salmeterol (FLU/SAL [500/50 μg, twice-daily [b.i.d.]); and efficacy of pooled MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg and 80/150/50 μg) versus pooled MF/IND (320/150 μg and 160/150 μg) was evaluated in patient subgroups with baseline blood eosinophil count of <300 cells/μL or ≥300 cells/μL. ResultsOverall, 3065 patients were included. At Week 26, high-dose MF/IND/GLY showed improved trough FEV1 versus high-dose MF/IND (Δ78mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ54mL [≥300 cells/μL]) and FLU/SAL (Δ112mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ98mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY also showed improved trough FEV1 versus pooled MF/IND (Δ75mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ68mL [≥300 cells/μL]).Over 52 weeks, high-dose MF/IND/GLY reduced the annualized rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations by 23% and 10%, severe exacerbations by 31% and 15%, and all exacerbation by 33% and 10% versus high-dose MF/IND for subgroups with <300 cells/μL and ≥300 cells/μL, respectively; and by 33% and 41%, 45% and 42%, 42% and 39% versus FLU/SAL, respectively. Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY reduced exacerbations by 22% and 8%, 21% and 7%, 27% and 8%, versus pooled MF/IND, for the respective subgroups. ConclusionMF/IND/GLY showed improvement in lung function and reduction in asthma exacerbations over MF/IND and FLU/SAL independent of baseline eosinophil levels, indicating that eosinophil levels did not affect the efficacy of MF/IND/GLY in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02571777 (IRIDIUM).

Controller therapy attenuates asthma exacerbations associated with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children

Controller therapy attenuates asthma exacerbations associated with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children