Recurrent Restenosis Research Articles

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoluminal Therapy for Chronic Atherosclerotic Occlusive Mesenteric Disease

Percutaneous interventions for symptomatic chronic mesenteric arterial atherosclerosis are rapidly gaining popularity. This study evaluates the long-term anatomic and functional outcomes of endovascular therapy for chronic atherosclerotic occlusive mesenteric arterial disease at a tertiary referral academic medical center. A retrospective analysis of records from patients who underwent endovascular mesenteric arterial interventions between 1984 and 2006 for chronic mesenteric ischemia was performed. Cases of acute ischemia or cases with associated bowel resection were excluded. Results were standardized to current Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to assess time-dependent outcomes. Factor analyses were performed using either a multivariate model for fixed variables or a Cox proportional hazard model for time-dependent variables. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM. Thirty-one patients (84% female, average age 70, range 43-90, years) with 41 visceral vessel interventions were identified. Indications for intervention included weight loss >10 kg (61%) and/or postprandial pain (94%). The median SVS comorbidity score was 15 (range 10-24). All had three-vessel athero-occlusive mesenteric disease with a median of two vessels occluded on angiography. The median number of vessels revascularized was two. In all cases stenosis, and not occlusion, was treated. The 90-day mortality was 20% and the major morbidity was 6%. While primary and assisted patency rates for the interventions at 7 years were 69 +/- 8% and 72 +/- 9%, respectively (mean +/- SE, n > or = 10), cumulative freedom from recurrent symptoms was only 56 +/- 10%. Twenty percent of the vessels developed restenosis at a median interval of 0.29 years (range 0.3-2.8), with a freedom from restenosis of 79 +/- 8% at 5 years. Fifty percent of these, all with recurrent symptoms, were reintervened successfully with balloon angioplasty and resolution of their symptoms. There was no significant difference between the celiac and superior mesenteric artery outcomes. The correlation of recurrent symptoms and restenosis was significant (p < 0.001). Endoluminal therapy for chronic mesenteric ischemia carries a low morbidity and mortality in a high-risk population. While anatomic patency remains high, long-term therapeutic benefit is not achieved. In its present iteration, endovascular therapy for mesenteric ischemia should be limited to those patients without an open surgical option.

Inhibiting the vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation by EPC and DPPC liposomes encapsulated magnolol

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a non-surgical modality for treating stennosis. However, the recurrence of restenosis in 30–50% patients within 6 months is the major drawback of PTCA. The major reason of restenosis is the proliferation of the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Magnolol, a pure compound extracted from Magnolia officinalis, encapsulated by liposome was investigated for inhibiting the VSMCs proliferation leading to restenosis by PTCA. 1,2-Diacyl- Sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (EPC) and 1,2-dipalmitoyl- Sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) liposomes were utilized to encapsulate the magnolol. EPC liposome obtained the higher encapsulation efficiency than DPPC lipsomes from UV–vis spectroscopy study. The inhibiting efficiency of EPC and DPPC liposomes encapsulated magnolol was higher than pure magnonol. Magnolol encapsulated by EPC liposomes had better efficiency on inhibiting VSMCs than DPPC liposome. Addition of cholesterol in liposomes could slightly enhance the encapsulation efficiency. The particles sizer analysis revealed the average particles size of EPC and DPPC liposomes encapsulated magnolol became larger than pure EPC or DPPC liposomes. From the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, the magnolol seems to interfere with EPC and DPPC liposomes to form a homogeneous lipid bilayer.

Fractured Internal Carotid Artery Stent

Carotid artery stenting is gaining wider acceptance as an alternative option in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Conventional complications such as stroke and recurrent in-stent restenosis are well documented in the literature. However, we believe that carotid stent complications are underreported. The carotid artery segment has features that are relatively smilar to the femoropopliteal segment with respect to forces affecting the stented segment, which can contribute to stent complications such as fracture. In this article, we present a case of internal carotid artery stent fracture and thrombus formation after the patient was exposed to direct trauma to the chest and neck.

Catheter-based local antiproliferative therapy in kissing balloon technique for in-stent stenosis of coronary artery bifurcation lesions

There is currently no promising interventional solution for in-stent stenosis in previously stented bifurcation lesions, even with drug-eluting stents. Rather than being restricted to stent struts, catheter-based local antiproliferative therapy offers the advantage of homogenous drug transfer to the whole vessel wall, and thereby allows for intracoronary pharmacotherapy without adding additional layers of metal into an already stented lesion. The newly developed GENIE catheter (Acrostak Corp, Switzerland), applied in the kissing balloon technique, allows for delivery of liquid paclitaxel into whole bifurcation lesions without repeat stent implantation. After conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, local delivery of paclitaxel using two GENIE catheters in the kissing balloon technique was performed in three patients (left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary arteries) with highly symptomatic in-stent bifurcation stenoses. The intervention was feasible and safe in all coronary arteries. Final angiography and control angiography after six months showed good results. No major adverse cardiac events occurred 30 days and six months after intervention. The patients, who represent a group at high risk of recurrent instent restenosis, remained asymptomatic since the local drug delivery. They did not require insertion of a drug-eluting stent or crossover to coronary artery bypass surgery. In conclusion, this new treatment strategy proved to be safe and effective in this first human experience and offers a promising alternative to surgery or implantation of additional stents in these patients.

Recurrent restenosis after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in aorto-ostial lesions: successful treatment with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents

We describe three cases of aorto-ostial lesions with recurrent restenosis after multiple modalities of percutaneous treatment, including sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in all cases and intravascular brachytherapy in one case. In-stent restenosis was successfully managed with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents. Six-month angiographic follow-up documented complete patency of the target segment in all patients.

Treatment of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Restenosis With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation—Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes

The best way to treat drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients who presented with paclitaxel-eluting stent restenosis and were treated by sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. The main strategy adopted at our center for the treatment of patients with paclitaxel-eluting stent restenosis was the implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. This study included all patients treated in this manner, and data were collected prospectively. Routine angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6-8 months after the intervention. Angiographic restenosis was defined as a restenosis 50% of the diameter in the segment zone. Clinical follow-up was continued for up to 2 years. The major adverse cardiac events monitored were death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. The study cohort comprised 43 consecutive patients. At baseline, 33 (76.7%) had focal restenosis, while the remaining 10 (23.3%) had diffuse restenosis. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 36 (83%) patients. Binary restenosis occurred in 6 (16.7%), and instent late luminal loss was 0.32 +/- 0.54 mm. At 2 years, target lesion revascularization had been carried out in 7 (16.3%) patients, while major adverse cardiac events had occurred in 11 (25.8%). Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent as treatment for paclitaxel-eluting stent failure is a viable therapeutic strategy that was associated in this study with the durable prevention of recurrent restenosis. The 2-year revascularization and major adverse cardiac event rates were high, though they were acceptable for a cohort of such high-risk patients.

The impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis

Objectives:We evaluated the predictors of recurrent restenosis and the impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes in patients treated with routine sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for in-stent restenosis...

Et Tu, Bare Metal Stent?

When performing percutaneous coronary revascularization, physicians nearly always supplement balloon angioplasty with a stent.1 This decision is based on evidence that stent implantation enhances the procedural success and durability of angioplasty. Benefits of stenting, compared with balloon angioplasty, include a reduction in the incidence of lesion recurrence, manifested as reduced need for repeat revascularization and lower rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI).2–5 The major shortcoming of bare metal stents (BMS) is that ≈20% of native vessel and 30% of saphenous vein graft patients develop angiographic restenosis from neointimal hyperplasia. About half of these patients will have clinical restenosis and require repeat revascularization. In contrast to the favorable results of stents in de novo lesions, stenting of in-stent restenotic lesions with BMS results in more restenosis. Before the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, of multiple therapies investigated, only intracoronary brachytherapy was effective in preventing recurrent in-stent restenosis.6,7 Article p 2391 Fortunately, the DES was developed to suppress neointimal hyperplasia, and several randomized, double-blind, clinical trials demonstrated the ability of DES to substantially reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis.8–10 Within a short time after commercialization, DES nearly replaced BMS in the United States, and the number of patients requiring repeat revascularization fell substantially.1 As clinical restenosis became infrequent, another potential and untoward event related to stents became more exposed—namely, stent thrombosis. This disorder can cause abrupt coronary occlusion and frequently clinically manifests as acute MI or death. Although stent thrombosis was common during the early years of BMS use, improvements in the technique of stent implantation and the administration of both aspirin and a thienopyridine (dual antiplatelet therapy) reduced the incidence of acute stent thrombosis to clinically acceptable levels.11,12 More recently, …

Identification of a polymorphism of UCP3 associated with recurrent in-stent restenosis of coronary arteries

The purpose of the present study was to identify gene polymorphisms that confer susceptibility to recurrent restenosis after bare-metal stenting of coronary arteries, and thereby to assess the genetic risk for this condition. The study population comprised 527 unrelated Japanese individuals, including 28 subjects who developed in-stent restenosis two or more times and 499 subjects without restenosis. The genotypes for 142 polymorphisms of 121 candidate genes were determined with a method that combines the polymerase chain reaction and sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes with suspension array technology. Eleven polymorphisms were related (P<0.05) to the prevalence of recurrent in-stent restenosis as determined by the Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and the prevalence of smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia revealed that the -55Cright curved arrow T polymorphism of the uncoupling protein 3 gene (UCP3) was significantly (P=0.0006 in a recessive model) associated with the prevalence of recurrent in-stent restenosis, with the T allele representing a risk factor for this condition. A stepwise forward selection procedure showed that the UCP3 genotype significantly (P=0.0014, recessive model) affected the prevalence of recurrent in-stent restenosis. Determination of the genotype for UCP3 may thus contribute to assessment of the genetic risk for recurrent in-stent restenosis.

Drug-Eluting Stent for Recurrent Mesenteric Artery In-Stent Restenosis

To report the use of a drug-eluting stent (DES) for treatment of symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). A 79-year-old woman suffering from chronic renal failure and needing dialysis was admitted for vomiting, postprandial abdominal pain, and weight loss for 3 months. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) documented massive calcification of the vascular bed, mainly in the aorta, and a very tight ostial stenosis of the SMA. A 4.5-x20-mm Genesis stent was deployed at the ostium, with good angiographic result and immediate symptomatic benefit. After 3 months, symptoms recurred; angiography demonstrated ISR. Percutaneous angioplasty with a 4-x15-mm cutting balloon was performed. The patient remained asymptomatic for only 2 months; recurrent ISR at this time was treated with a 3.5-x24-mm coronary TAXUS Express paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent deployed inside the previously implanted stent. Under prolonged double antiplatelet regimen, the patient was asymptomatic at the 8-month follow-up; CTA demonstrated patency of the SMA. Considering the high rate of restenosis and the periprocedural complications described with endovascular treatment of SMA stenosis, a drug-eluting stent may be a good option not only for the treatment of restenosis but also in de novo lesions, at least when the vessel diameter is <4.5 mm.

Drug-Eluting Stent for Recurrent Mesenteric Artery In-Stent Restenosis

Drug-Eluting Stent for Recurrent Mesenteric Artery In-Stent Restenosis

Restenosis following Percutaneous Renal Artery Revascularization

Background/Aims: Restenosis following percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) remains a concern even in the era of adjuvant stenting. The optimal form of therapy, and particularly the role of repeat PTRA in the treatment of recurrent hypertension associated with renal artery restenosis, is largely unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the risk factors for restenosis and to evaluate the blood pressure outcomes of patients who underwent repeat PTRA. Methods: Clinical and procedural characteristics of 32 patients who developed recurrent hypertension and renal artery restenosis were compared to a control group of patients who maintained renal artery patency and adequate blood pressure control after the first procedure. The groups were matched for sex and initial procedure date. Results: The restenosis group had a mean age of 71 ± 12 years, a female/male ratio of 24/8, an average blood pressure of 179/87 mm Hg, despite three antihypertensive medications, and a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.4 mg/dl. Repeat PTRA performed for clinically significant restenosis was 10.7 ± 8 months after the first procedure, and 17 of the 32 patients had a measurable blood pressure benefit at last follow-up (177 ± 119 weeks). The development of restenosis was positively associated with body weight (p = 0.003) and body mass index (p = 0.008), but independent of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, or statin therapy. Of the 15 patients who failed the second procedure, 4 went on to have third PTRA, none of whom had sustained benefit. Conclusions: An increased body mass index is associated with restenosis following initial PTRA. Patients with restenosis can be treated successfully with repeat PTRA which provides sustained improvement in blood pressure control in approximately half of these patients.

Neointimal progression and luminal narrowing in sirolimus-eluting stent treatment for bare metal in-stent restenosis: A quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis

Recurrent restenosis may occur after drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of bare metal stents (BMSs), especially in areas involving drug-eluting stent gaps. To investigate the details of neointimal progression and luminal narrowing after the treatment of ISR using sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), serial intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed in 65 patients with ISR at postintervention and at 6-month follow-up. The total stented segment was categorized into 3 compartments: new SES (N), new SES and old BMS overlap (N/O), and old BMS (O). In each of the 190 compartments, serial intravascular ultrasound parameters were analyzed at the cross section of the maximum change in neointimal area (delta neointimal area) from postintervention to follow-up or the minimum lumen area at follow-up if delta neointimal area was 0. Minimum lumen area in each compartment was also investigated serially. At postintervention, lumen area was the smallest in compartment N/O (N 5.8 +/- 1.5, N/O 5.1 +/- 1.3, O 6.0 +/- 1.4 mm2, P = .005). Not only the average of maximum delta neointimal area (N 0.2 +/- 0.4, N/O 0.2 +/- 0.4, O 0.8 +/- 1.0 mm2, P < .0001) but also the frequency of minimum lumen area decreasing from > or = 4.0 mm2 at postintervention to < 4.0 mm2 at follow-up (N 4.0%, N/O 5.1%, O 23.5%, P = .012) was the largest in compartment O. Neointimal progression and consequent luminal narrowing tend to occur where BMS is uncovered with SES in treatment of ISR, even in the absence of an obvious stenosis at postintervention.

How to treat recurrent renal artery instent restenosis? Editorial comment on treatment of reoccuring instent restenosis following reintervention after stent‐supported renal artery angioplasty–Article by Zeller et al.

How to treat recurrent renal artery instent restenosis? Editorial comment on treatment of reoccuring instent restenosis following reintervention after stent‐supported renal artery angioplasty–Article by Zeller et al.

Comparison of Six-Month Angiographic and Three-Year Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Brachytherapy for Bare Metal In-Stent Restenosis

To evaluate long-term effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for diffuse bare metal in-stent restenosis (ISR), we compared 6-month angiographic and long-term (3-year) clinical outcomes of SES implantation and intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT). SES implantation for diffuse ISR was performed in 120 consecutive patients and their results were compared with those from 240 patients treated with beta-radiation with balloons filled with rhenium-188 and mercaptoacetyltriglycine. The radiation dose was 15 or 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was 3-year major adverse cardiac events including myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and target lesion revascularization. The 2 groups were similar in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Lesion lengths were 25.1 +/- 14.2 mm in the SES group and 24.5 +/- 10.4 mm in the ICBT group (p = 0.15). In-stent acute gain was greater in the SES group than in the ICBT group (2.23 +/- 0.62 vs 1.91 +/- 0.54 mm, p <0.001). We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 287 patients (79.7%). In-segment angiographic restenoses were 7.4% (7 of 94) in the SES group and 26.4% (51 of 193) in the ICBT group (p <0.05). Two myocardial infarctions (1 in each group) and 5 deaths (4 in SES group, 1 in ICBT group) occurred during 3-year follow-up. At 3 years, survival rates without target lesion revascularization (94.1 +/- 2.2% vs 84.6 +/- 2.3%, p = 0.011) and major adverse cardiac events (92.5 +/- 2.4% vs 84.2 +/- 2.4%, respectively, p = 0.03) were higher in the SES than in the ICBT group. In conclusion, compared with ICBT, SES implantation for diffuse ISR is more effective in decreasing recurrent restenosis and improving long-term outcomes.

Contemporary Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis and the Incidence of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

Optimal treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains uncertain in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES). This study aims to determine contemporary treatment of ISR and to assess recurrent ISR rates in the era of DES. We examined 60 patients presenting for treatment of ISR (one lesion per patient) who were enrolled in the Melbourne Interventional Group Registry (4% of total population of 1423 patients) between April 2004 and January 2005. Twelve-month follow-up is complete for all patients. The majority of ISR treated occurred in bare metal stents [BMS (n=52, 87%)] and had a focal (<10 mm) pattern of ISR (53%). In-stent restenosis of DES occurred in eight (13%) patients. The majority of ISR were treated with additional stenting with a preference for DES over BMS in almost all cases. At 12 months, one patient died of non-cardiac cause and four patients (7%) presented with recurrent ISR. The incidence of recurrent ISR in DES was 5% (n=3). No late thrombosis was reported despite only 50% of patients having >or=12 months of clopidogrel therapy. Our study suggests drug-eluting stents are safe, effective and the preferred therapy for in-stent restenosis. The incidence of recurrent drug-eluting stent restenosis at 12 months is low.

Mycotic pseudoaneurysm of the left circumflex coronary artery: A fatal complication following drug‐eluting stent implantation

Coronary artery stent infection is a rare complication of percutaneous intervention. We report a case of fulminant coronary stent infection with Staphylococcus aureus presenting as a pseudoaneurysm of the left circumflex artery following repeated implantation of drug-eluting stents in the setting of multiple episodes of recurrent in-stent restenosis. We speculate that sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents may be more likely to predispose to infection than bare metal stents because of their immunomodulating and antiproliferative effects.

Stent fracture in revascularization for symptomatic ostial vertebral artery stenosis

We assessed the long-term follow-up examinations and complications of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) for symptomatic ostial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis. A retrospective study was done to evaluate 12 patients with symptomatic ostial VA stenosis who underwent PTAS. Six patients were treated with the Palmaz stent and six with a balloon-expandable coronary stent. Initial angiographic follow-up examination was conducted about 12 months after PTAS in all patients. Simple radiographic, ultrasonographic and clinical follow-up examinations were scheduled every 6 months. Excellent dilatation was achieved in all patients without any procedural complications. Initial angiographic follow-up obtained at a mean of 13 months after PTAS detected no restenosis. However, an asymptomatic severe restenosis was detected at 24 months after PTAS in one patient (8%). During a mean follow-up of 31.5 months, three stent fractures were detected in deployed coronary stents (50%). None of the stent fractures was associated with either recurrent stroke or restenosis. No patients developed recurrent symptoms during the follow-up period. PTAS for symptomatic ostial VA stenosis is effective in preventing recurrent stroke. As the open-cell single-joint type of stent is associated with the risk of fracture, long-term follow-up examinations including simple radiography are needed.

Incidence and predictors of recurrent restenosis following implantation of drug‐eluting stents for in‐stent restenosis

We investigated the incidence and predictors of recurrent restenosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in routine clinical practice. Although DESs have been increasingly used for treatment of ISR, little is known about the predictors of DES failure. We determined the incidence of recurrent restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 224 consecutive patients with 239 lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting (n=217 lesions) or paclitaxel-eluting (n=22 lesions) stents for the first episode of ISR. The procedural success rate was 99.2%, and in-hospital complications did not occur in any patient. Follow-up angiography at 6 months was obtained in 73.7% of patients. Angiographic re-restenosis rate was 12.6%, and target lesion revascularization was required in 7.6% of patients. Of the 22 incidents of re-restenosis, 15 were focal (68.2%), 5 were diffuse (22.7%), and 2 were total (9.1%) restenosis. Univariate analysis showed that lesion length, use of paclitaxel-eluting stent, and number of stents per lesion were significant predictors of re-restenosis. In multivariate analysis, however, lesion length and use of paclitaxel-eluting stent were independent predictors of re-restenosis. During the follow-up (mean, 18.3+/-8.1 months), there were 4 deaths (1 cardiac, 3 noncardiac), but no nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs). MACE occurred in 18 patients. The cumulative probability of MACE-free survival was 92.9+/-1.8% at 1 year and 90.5+/-2.4% at 2 years. DESs are highly effective for treatment of ISR, with recurrent restenosis related to lesion length and type of DES.

Intracoronary radiation therapy for multi‐drug resistant in‐stent restenosis: Initial clinical experience

While randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the excellent efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for de novo lesions, the optimal treatment for SES-restenosis is not known. Management may include stand-alone balloon angioplasty, repeat SES implantation, or placement of a drug-eluting stent (DES) with an alternative antiproliferative agent (i.e., a paclitaxel-eluting stent, PES). The appropriate management strategy for recurrent restenosis after PES implantation for SES restenosis is even less clear. We report the initial clinical experience with intracoronary radiation therapy (ICRT) for multi-DES resistant restenosis. We performed ICRT in five patients with recurrent restenosis after treatment with both SES and PES. Over a median follow-up of 256 days (range 75-489 days), one patient had a target lesion revascularization at 182 days and subsequently died at 483 days following the procedure. Our findings support the further study of this management approach.