Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Real-world outcomes of anti-PD1 antibodies in platinum-refractory, PD-L1-positive recurrent and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, and its potential practical predictors: first report from Korean Cancer Study Group LU19-05.

Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors have become a new therapeutic option for recurrent/metastatic non-small cell lung cancers (R/M-NSCLC), its clinical benefit in the real-world is still unclear. We investigated 1181 Korean patients with programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 10% by the SP263 assay or ≥ 50% by the 22C3 assay] R/M-NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The median age was 67years, 13% of patients had ECOG-PS ≥ 2, and 27% were never-smokers. Adenocarcinoma was predominant (61%) and 18.1% harbored an EGFR activating mutation or ALK rearrangement. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab were administered to 51.3% and 48.7, respectively, and 42% received them beyond the third-line chemotherapy. Objective response rate (ORR) was 28.6%. Pembrolizumab group showed numerically higher ORR (30.7%) than the nivolumab group (26.4%), but it was comparable with that of the nivolumab group having PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% (32.4%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.9 (95% CI 0-27.9) and 10.7months (95% CI 0-28.2), respectively. In multivariable analysis, concordance of TPS ≥ 50% in both PD-L1 assays and the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were two significant predictors of better ORR, PFS, and OS. EGFR mutation could also predict significantly worse OS outcomes. The real-world benefit of later-line anti-PD1 antibodies was comparable to clinical trials in patients with R/M-NSCLC, although patients generally were more heavily pretreated and had poorer ECOG-PS. Concordantly high PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and development of irAE could independently predict better treatment outcomes, while EGFR mutation negatively affected OS.

Salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

ObjectivesThe prognostic impact of surgical intervention for recurrent or residual non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains unclear. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing salvage surgery in this setting. MethodsWe retrospectively collected and analyzed nationwide Japanese data on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent salvage surgery after EGFR or ALK-TKI during 2010−2015. The primary endpoint was a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and secondary endpoints were the rate of adverse events, perioperative mortality rate, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and median survival time after salvage lung resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors of OS and RFS. ResultsThirty-six patients were included (EGFR-TKI: 33, ALK-TKI: 3). The 3-year OS and RFS after the surgery were 75.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 55.9–86.9 %) and 22.2 % (95 % CI 8.6–39.7 %), respectively. Of clinicopathological factors, the progression of disease while on TKI and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (≥5 ng/mL) were shown to be worse independent prognosticators of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 9.38, 95 % CI 1.57–55.88, P = .014; HR 4.84, 95 % CI 1.62–14.46, P = .005, respectively). Older age at initial treatment (≥70 years) and advanced pathological T stage (T2-T4) were the worse prognosticators for RFS (HR 12.58, 95 % CI 2.51–62.97, P = .002; HR 3.06, 95 % CI 1.04–9.03, P = .043, respectively). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 5.6 % (2/36) patients, but no deaths were reported within 90 days after surgery. ConclusionOur study showed that salvage surgery after TKI treatment was safe and feasible and may contribute to prolonged OS time by reducing the local tumor burden.

Prognostic impact of primary cancer adjoining emphysematous bullae in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although lung cancer adjoining emphysematous bullae (Ca-ADJ) were reported to express higher programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), the predictive impact of Ca-ADJ on the response to ICIs is unknown. Two hundred and fifty-seven advanced or recurrent NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy at Kyushu University Hospital and National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center were analyzed. To minimize the bias arising from the patients' background, adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses using inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) were performed. Of the 257 patients, 55 had Ca-ADJ. Patients with Ca-ADJ were significantly associated with younger age (P = 0.0343), male sex (P = 0.0070), and smoking (P = 0.0080). The objective response rate of cases with Ca-ADJ was significantly higher than that of those without Ca-ADJ (36.4% vs. 20.8%, respectively; P = 0.0167). The disease control rate of cases with Ca-ADJ was also significantly higher than tumors without Ca-ADJ (63.6% vs. 47.5%, respectively; P = 0.0341). The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with Ca-ADJ had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without Ca-ADJ (P = 0.0407 and P = 0.0126, respectively). On IPTW-adjusted Cox analysis, Ca-ADJ was an independent predictor of PFS and OS (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Patients with Ca-ADJ may be good candidates for ICIs. These findings should be validated prospectively.

MO01.02 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus platinum doublet chemotherapy (PDC) for the first-line (1L) treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States (US) from a payer perspective.

Trop2 binding IGF2R induces gefitinib resistance in NSCLC by remodeling the tumor microenvironment.

Gefitinib has shown good efficacy in treating recurrent or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the drug resistance remains a clinical challenge in medical oncology. In addition, the complex interaction between tumor cells and heterogeneous stromal cells in the adjacent tumor microenvironment (TME) is also an important contributor to drug resistance. So, it is very necessary to detect the related target genes before and after gefitinib treatment dynamically. In this study, the relationship between Trop2 and gefitinib resistance in NSCLC was investigated, and the underlying mechanism was explored. Results showed that Trop2 was associated with EGFR gene mutation and drug resistance in clinical tissues. Trop2 was confirmed to induce gefitinib resistance in NSCLC, and Trop2 binding IGF2R promoted the IGF2-IGF1R-Akt axis to enhance gefitinib resistance and remodeling the TME in NSCLC. Notably, silencing of Trop2 in cancer cells combined with IGF1R inhibitor significantly decreased the proliferation of tumor cells and reshaped the NSCLC TME in vivo and in vitro, including the recruitment of macrophages. These findings deepened the understanding of the function of Trop2 and the involved mechanisms of gefitinib resistance, and may provide new molecular targets for NSCLC with gefitinib resistance.

Selection of optimal first-line immuno-related therapy based on specific pathological characteristics for patients with advanced driver-gene wild-type non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background:Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival for advanced wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a lack of direct comparisons of various first-line treatments is clouding clinical decision-making. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare current first-line treatments and identify the optimal regimen for patients with specific characteristics.Methods:PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical Trials databases were searched from inception to 31 July 2020. Phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line treatments including chemotherapy, anti-angiogenesis, ICIs, and their combinations for previously untreated stage IIIB/IV or recurrent driver-gene wild-type NSCLC patients were included.Results:Twenty-six RCTs were identified and included, involving 16,977 patients and a total of 18 regimens. ICI-containing treatments led to significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with ICI-free treatments (0.82, 0.72–0.93). ICI plus chemotherapy had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; 0.70, 0.58–0.86) and marginally longer OS (0.90, 0.79–1.05) compared with ICIs alone. Ranking highest in the Bayesian network meta-analysis, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy, had significantly superior OS than standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab treatments. Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy ranked first for OS, 1-year OS rate, and subgroups of non-squamous, PD-L1 ⩾1%, non-smoking, and liver metastasis; while nivolumab–ipilimumab–chemotherapy for squamous, PD-L1 <1%, brain metastasis NSCLC. Furthermore, the ICI-containing bevacizumab-free treatments, such as pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy, were not significantly different from atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab in OS.Conclusions:A combination of ICIs with chemotherapy, rather than double ICIs, is the best first-line treatment for advanced wild-type NSCLC, with synergy that leads to better long-term survival. The panoramic view of the relative efficacy of any two regimens with different rankings provides strong evidence for selecting optimal first-line ICIs according to patients’ clinical characteristics.

The Totality of Evidence and Use of ABP 215, a Biosimilar to Bevacizumab.

ABP 215 (MVASI™, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA; MVASI™, Amgen Europe B.V., Netherlands) is a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) reference product (RP), a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Here we provide a brief overview of the totality of evidence that supported the approval of ABP 215, along with practical considerations to ensure safe and effective administration.ABP 215 has been shown to be highly similar to the RP, with similar mechanism of action, analytical (structural and functional) characteristics, binding, and potency. The similarity of PK parameters of ABP 215 and bevacizumab RP has been confirmed in healthy volunteers.In a comparative clinical trial, patients with stage IV or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel were randomized to ABP 215 or bevacizumab RP. No clinically meaningful differences were found between ABP 215 and RP. The objective response rate (ORR) was 39% for ABP 215 and 41.7% for bevacizumab RP. The risk ratio for the ORR was 0.93 [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.80–1.09], which fell within the prespecified margin for equivalence of 0.67–1.5, indicating similar clinical efficacy.Similar to bevacizumab RP, ABP 215 is supplied as a clear to slightly opalescent, colorless to pale yellow, sterile solution in a glass vial. It should be diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride in polyvinylchloride or polyolefin bags before administering as an intravenous infusion. The ABP 215 solution should be stored at 2–8 °C (36–46°F) prior to use. Physicochemical stability studies showed that there were no meaningful changes in purity or potency and no loss of protein after storage at 2–8 °C for 35 days followed by storage at 30 °C for 48 h.Electronic Supplementary MaterialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40487-020-00133-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Dynamic changes in circulating PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes for predicting treatment response to PD-1 blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

The predictive value of immune monitoring with circulating CD8+ T lymphocytes for treatment response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors has not been explored in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prompting us to investigate whether dynamic changes in PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes have predictive value for durable clinical benefit (DCB) and survival after PD-1 blockade. Patients with recurrent and/or metastatic NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors were enrolled (discovery cohort; n=94). Peripheral blood was obtained immediately before and after one cycle of treatment with PD-1 blockade. Phenotyping of circulating CD8+ T lymphocytes was conducted using multi-colour flow cytometry. Predictive values of dynamic changes in circulating PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes during the first cycle were validated in an independent cohort (validation cohort; n=54) of a prospective trial with a PD-1 inhibitor (NCT03486119). Circulating PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes were enriched with effector/memory populations with elevated expression of activation- and exhaustion-related markers. Reduction in the frequency of PD-1+ cells among CD8+ T lymphocytes after one cycle of treatment was associated with a higher probability of DCB and superior survival outcomes in the discovery cohort. Similar results were obtained in the analysis of tumour antigen NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes and the validation cohort. Mechanistically, PD-1 molecule expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes suppresses the effector functions of tumour antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes. Dynamic changes in circulating PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes predict clinical, and survival benefit from PD-1 blockade treatment in NSCLC, providing a useful tool to identify patient subgroups who will optimally benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.

Clinical utility of pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

ObjectivesImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although inflammatory indices, including Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) were reported to be reliable predictors for survival in cancer patients, their clinical utility in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs is unknown. Materials and methodsAdvanced or recurrent NSCLC patients (n = 304) treated with ICI monotherapy at the National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center and Kyushu University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed. Information on patient demographics, GPS, mGPS, and CAR at diagnosis were collected. The time-dependent area under curves (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristic curves for the prediction of overall survival (OS) for each factor were compared. ResultsOf the three indices, GPS was the most significantly correlated with the degree of disease control rate (DCR) (DCR of GPS of 0, 1, and 2: 63.6 %, 49.4 %, and 41.4 %, respectively). The time-dependent AUC values of GPS for the prediction of OS were superior to those of mGPS and CAR (time-dependent AUC values of GPS, mGPS, and CAR for the prediction of 1-year OS: 0.7005, 0.6736, and 0.6565, respectively). GPS was significantly correlated with performance status (PS) (P < 0.0001) and clinical stage (P = 0.0139). GPS in combination with PS effectively predicted survival at 1 year ranging from 83.5 % (GPS = 0, PS = 0) to 25.0 % (GPS = 2, PS = 2, 3). A multivariable analysis revealed that GPS was an independent predictor of PFS and OS (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0100, respectively). ConclusionsWe report for the first time that GPS represents a simple and useful prognostic factor in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs and should be validated prospectively.

PDG78 Stated Preferences in NON-SMALL Cell LUNG Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment

The different alternatives for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment can increase survival, but cause important adverse events. Therefore, patients’ opinion can play a critical role in decision-making. Among stated preference methods, discrete choice experiment (DCE) is the most applied in health care. This research aims to evaluate the trade-off between the risks (adverse events) and benefits (survival) of systemic treatments, from the perspective of Brazilian patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent NSCLC.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs erlotinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: Survival follow-up results of the randomized JO25567 study

ObjectivesThe JO25567 randomized Phase II study demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with erlotinib plus bevacizumab compared with erlotinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFR+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we present updated PFS and final overall survival (OS) data after a median follow-up of 34.7 months. Materials and methodsPatients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent NSCLC were randomized to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg once daily (n = 77) or erlotinib in combination with intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days (n = 75) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS was analyzed using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsConsistent with the primary analysis, addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib was associated with a significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.35–0.76; log-rank two-sided P = 0.0005; median 16.4 months vs 9.8 months, respectively). In contrast, a significant improvement in OS was not seen (HR 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.53–1.23; P = 0.3267; median 47.0 months vs 47.4 months, respectively). Post-study therapy was similar between the treatment arms and EGFR mutation type did not affect OS outcomes. The 5-year OS rate was numerically higher with erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs erlotinib monotherapy (41 % vs 35 %). Updated safety analyses confirmed the previously reported manageable tolerability profile, with no new safety issues. ConclusionAddition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib did not show significant improvement in OS in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent EGFR+ NSCLC. Both treatment arms showed a similar median OS benefit (as long as 4 years), irrespective of individual patient characteristics. Results from ongoing studies evaluating the combination of EGFR and VEGF signaling inhibitors are eagerly awaited. Trial registrationJapicCTI-111390 and JapicCTI-142569.

SB8: A Bevacizumab Biosimilar.

SB8 is a biosimilar of the monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab and is approved in the EU for use in the same types of cancer as bevacizumab. SB8 has similar physicochemical and pharmacodynamic properties to those of reference bevacizumab and pharmacokinetic equivalence was shown in healthy volunteers and patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SB8 demonstrated equivalent clinical efficacy to reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC, with similar tolerability, safety and immunogenicity profiles.

Plasma plastin-3: A tumor marker in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

Plastin-3 (PLS3) is a circulating tumor cell marker associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes. The present study aimed to investigate the usability of plasma PLS3 concentration in assessing the diagnosis, prognosis and sensitivity to treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. A total of 33 patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC were treated with nivolumab, and 10 healthy volunteers were retrospectively enrolled. Plasma concentrations of PLS3 were determined by ELISA. Plasma PLS3 concentration in patients with NSCLC was significantly higher compared with that in healthy volunteers (median 7.64 ng/ml vs. 3.13 ng/ml, P<0.001). Univariate analysis indicated that PLS3 ≤5.43 ng/ml was a predictor of partial response. Patients with PLS3 >8.55 ng/ml exhibited a poorer prognosis compared with those in the PLS3 ≤8.55 ng/ml group. A high plasma PLS3 concentration was a predictor of poor overall survival. In conclusion, plasma PLS3 concentration was identified as a marker for the diagnosis, treatment sensitivity and prognosis in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab. Plasma PLS3 may be a clinically useful tumor marker in patients with NSCLC; future prospective studies may confirm these results and explore its use in other cancers.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Long-term Update of Outcomes of Proton Beam Re-irradiation for Locoregionally Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Long-term Update of Outcomes of Proton Beam Re-irradiation for Locoregionally Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Risk factors for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background and purposeRadiation pneumonitis (RP) can be a potential fatal toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to examine the risk factors that predict RP and explore dosimetric tolerance for safe practice in a large institutional series of NSCLC patients. Materials and methodsPatients with early-stage and locally recurrent NSCLC who received lung SBRT between 2002 and 2015 formed the study population. The primary endpoint was grade 2 or above radiation pneumonitis (RP2). Lungs were re-contoured consistently by one radiation oncologist according to the RTOG atlas for organs at risk. Dosimetric factors were computed consistently with exclusion of gross tumor volume of either ipsilateral, contralateral, or total lungs. ResultsA total of 339 patients were eligible. With a median follow-up of 47 months, RP2 was recorded in 10% patients. History of respiratory comorbidity, previous thoracic radiation, right lung location, mean lung doses of total or ipsilateral lung, and total lung volume receiving 20 Gy were all significantly associated with the risk of RP2. The dosimetric parameters of contralateral lung, including mean dose and volume receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy, were not significantly associated with RP2 (ps > 0.05). A model of combining significant clinical and dosimetric factors had a predictive accuracy AUC of 0.76. According to this model, RP2 can be limited to <10% should the patient have no previous lung radiation and the mean dose of total and ipsilateral lungs be kept less than 6 Gy and 20 Gy, respectively. ConclusionDosimetric factors of total or ipsilateral lung together with important clinical factors were significant risk factors for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after SBRT. Constraining mean lung dose can limit clinically significant lung toxicity.

Machine learning reveals a PD-L1-independent prediction of response to immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer by gene expression context.

Current predictive biomarkers for PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1)/PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1)-directed immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mostly focus on features of tumour cells. However, the tumour microenvironment and immune context are expected to play major roles in governing therapy response. Against this background, we set out to apply context-sensitive feature selection and machine learning approaches on expression profiles of immune-related genes in diagnostic biopsies of patients with stage IV NSCLC. RNA expression levels were determined using the NanoString nCounter platform in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies obtained during the diagnostic workup of stage IV NSCLC from two thoracic oncology centres. A 770-gene panel covering immune-related genes and control genes was used. We applied supervised machine learning methods for feature selection and generation of predictive models. Feature selection and model creation were based on a training cohort of 55 patients with recurrent NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy. Resulting models identified patients with superior outcomes to immunotherapy, as validated in two subsequently recruited, separate patient cohorts (n=67, hazard ratio=0.46, p=0.035). The predictive information obtained from these models was orthogonal to PD-L1 expression as per immunohistochemistry: Selecting by PD-L1 positivity at immunohistochemistry plus model prediction identified patients with highly favourable outcomes. Independence of PD-L1 positivity and model predictions were confirmed in multivariate analysis. Visualisation of the models revealed the predictive superiority of the entire 7-gene context over any single gene. Using context-sensitive assays and bioinformatics capturing the tumour immune context allows precise prediction of response to PD-1/PD-L1-directed immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Ceritinib in Japanese patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+\u2009non-small cell lung cancer: interim analysis results of a post-marketing surveillance study

Ceritinib is a selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced and/or recurrent ALK fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As per the approval condition in Japan, this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study evaluated the clinical safety (including adverse events [AEs], adverse drug reactions [ADRs] and priority investigation items) and efficacy (including ORR and PFS) of ceritinib in Japanese patients. Interim analysis was conducted ~ 2 years after the start of this non-interventional, multicentre, uncontrolled, open-label, special drug-use investigation and results are reported from March 28, 2016 to April 28, 2018. Each patient was followed up for 1 year. Most patients started treatment with 750 mg ceritinib. Safety profile was similar to that observed at the time of approval. No new AEs or ADRs with incidences higher than that at approval were identified. The rate of gastrointestinal ADRs (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) was 73.64%. Meaningful efficacy was observed in both post-crizotinib and post-alectinib settings, with ORR of 29.55% (95% CI 20.29–40.22) and disease control rate of 53.41% (95% CI 42.46–64.12). No concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ceritinib were identified. No new measures, including modification of the PMS study protocol, are considered necessary.

Characteristics of surgically resected non‐small cell lung cancer patients with post‐recurrence cure

BackgroundThe prognosis of postoperative recurrence in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poor. However, depending on the recurrence patterns and treatment options, some patients can achieve long‐term survival following recurrence. In this study, we investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients with curable disease who developed postoperative recurrence.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 535 patients who had developed recurrence from among 1760 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent curative resection from 1990 to 2008.Post‐recurrence cure was defined as being cancer‐free for at least five years after treatment for recurrence in patients who had undergone radical local treatment or chemotherapy. The clinicopathological characteristics associated with post‐recurrence cure were analyzed.ResultsAmong 535 patients who developed recurrence, 24 (4.5%) achieved post‐recurrence cure. The median post‐recurrence follow‐up duration was 151 (85–275) months for those who achieved post‐recurrence cure. The solitary recurrent lesions and local treatment for the initial recurrence site were significantly more for patients who could be cured after they developed recurrence. All patients with post‐recurrence cure received only radical local treatment for the recurrent lesions.ConclusionsSome patients with solitary recurrent NSCLC lesions can be cured with only radical local treatment.Key points Significant findings of the study The post‐recurrence cure patients maintained a cancer‐free status for five years after treatment for recurrence without a second recurrence. All patients with post‐recurrence cure received only radical local treatment for recurrence and had significantly higher number of solitary recurrent lesions. What this study adds Some patients with solitary recurrent NSCLC lesions after resection can be cured with only radical local treatment.

Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Gene Amplification and Response to Nivolumab Monotherapy in Non–small Cell Lung Cancer

Robust predictors for response to anti-programmed death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully characterized. To evaluate whether PD-L1 (CD274) copy number gains (CNGs), comprising amplification and polysomy, in pretreatment specimens assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy in NSCLC. This multicenter cohort study enrolled 200 patients, of whom 194 had assessable tumors, with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab after progression following prior treatment at 14 institutions in Japan between July 2016 and December 2018. Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 12.6 (5.6-20.4) months. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. Sequential nivolumab was given on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Response was assessed every 4 cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Overall response rate (ORR) according to the PD-L1 copy number status. Additional end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) assessed by immunohistochemistry based on PD-L1 copy number status. A total of 6 of the 200 patients were excluded because of poor-quality tumor specimens for the biomarker study, resulting in 194 assessable patients. Of these, 155 (79.9%) were men, with a median (range) age of 69 (43-83) years. PD-L1 CNGs were identified in 32 patients (16.5%), including 5 (2.6%) with amplification and 27 (13.9%) with polysomy. The ORR among patients with and without PD-L1 CNGs was 28.1% (95% CI, 13.7%-46.7%) and 17.9% (95% CI, 12.3%-24.7%), respectively. Although patients with PD-L1 polysomy did not demonstrate improved ORR (18.5% [95% CI, 6.3%-38.1%]) compared with those without PD-L1 CNGs, 4 of 5 patients (80.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-99.5%]) with PD-L1 amplification showed response, among whom median duration of response was not reached. Patients with PD-L1 amplification showed excellent survival outcomes for progression-free and overall survival. Overall, 3 PD-L1-amplified tumors (60.0%) showed PD-L1 TPS of at least 80%, but 2 (40.0%) had PD-L1 TPS of 15% or less. In this study, tumor PD-L1 amplification but not polysomy was associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy among patients with NSCLC. External validation with a larger sample size is warranted.