Recurrent Endometrial Cancer Research Articles

Development and validation of a circulating tumor DNA-based optimization-prediction model for short-term postoperative recurrence of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecological malignancy that typically requires prompt surgical intervention; however, the advantage of surgical management is limited by the high postoperative recurrence rates and adverse outcomes. Previous studies have highlighted the prognostic potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring for minimal residual disease in patients with EC. AIM To develop and validate an optimized ctDNA-based model for predicting short-term postoperative EC recurrence. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 294 EC patients treated surgically from 2015-2019 to devise a short-term recurrence prediction model, which was validated on 143 EC patients operated between 2020 and 2021. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate Cox, Lasso, and multivariate Cox regressions. A nomogram was created to predict the 1, 1.5, and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCA), leading to a recurrence risk stratification system. RESULTS Based on the regression analysis and the nomogram created, patients with postoperative ctDNA-negativity, postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen 125 (CA125) levels of < 19 U/mL, and grade G1 tumors had improved RFS after surgery. The nomogram’s efficacy for recurrence prediction was confirmed through ROC analysis, calibration curves, and DCA methods, highlighting its high accuracy and clinical utility. Furthermore, using the nomogram, the patients were successfully classified into three risk subgroups. CONCLUSION The nomogram accurately predicted RFS after EC surgery at 1, 1.5, and 2 years. This model will help clinicians personalize treatments, stratify risks, and enhance clinical outcomes for patients with EC.

Immunotherapy for endometrial cancer.

Advanced recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) has a poor prognosis and new treatment options are needed. In 2013, EC was classified by genomic analysis into four groups: the POLE ultra-mutated group, the MSI-high hypermutated group (MSI-H), the copy number low group, and the copy number high group. The prognosis differs based on the classification, which should enable the individualization of treatment. The MSI-H and POLE types can induce PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Among the gynecological cancers, EC exhibits the highest levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and has the highest proportion of MSI-H. Thus, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is expected to be effective. The first ICI to show efficacy in recurrent EC was the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab, which exhibited efficacy in MSI-H EC. The combination of pembrolizumab and the multi-kinase inhibitor lenvatinib significantly prolongs OS/PFS compared with single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent EC, regardless of MSI status. ICIs are now moving from second-line and beyond to first-line treatment regimens. The efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) and ICI combinations compared with TC have been demonstrated, including an ongoing Phase III trial comparing chemotherapy with the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. Although ICIs are becoming the mainstay of EC, they cause systemic inflammatory side effects known as irAEs. The incidence of irAEs is higher for combination therapy with CT or lenvatinib compared with ICI therapy alone. Even though they are rarely fatal, irAEs should be addressed promptly.

Cluster analysis of social isolation in gynecologic cancer patients: A cross-sectional survey.

To identify the distinct clusters of social isolation among gynecologic cancer patients and analyze the predictive factors associated with each cluster. A total of 463 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer were recruited from three tertiary hospitals between November 2021 and March 2023. Using a two-step cluster analysis, participants were categorized into clusters based on social isolation scales. Multinomial logistic regression was then employed to predict factors influencing the identified clusters. Social isolation in gynecologic cancer patients manifested in four distinct clusters: mild social isolation subgroup (13.8%), moderate social isolation subgroup (32.0%), severe isolation subgroup (33.5%), and high social isolation (20.70%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that cognitive emotional regulation, social support, negative emotions, endometrial cancer, and disease recurrence or metastasis were significant predictive factors for the identified social isolation clusters (P < 0.05). The study underscored the heterogeneity in the social isolation characteristics of gynecologic cancer patients. Consequently, healthcare professionals should prioritize the identification of potential high-risk groups and devise personalized interventions to prevent and mitigate the occurrence of social isolation.

New online dynamic nomograms to predict recurrence-free and overall survival after resection of endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study

PurposeThe significant global burden of endometrial cancer (EC) and the challenges associated with predicting EC recurrence indicate the need for a dynamic prediction model. This study aimed to propose nomograms based on clinicopathological variables to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgical resection for EC.MethodsThis single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgical resection for EC. Web-based nomograms were developed to predict RFS and OS following resection for EC, and their discriminative and calibration abilities were assessed.ResultsThis study included 289 patients (median age, 56 years). At a median follow-up of 51.1 (range, 4.1–128.3) months, 13.5% (39/289) of patients showed relapse or died, and 10.7% (31/289) had non-endometrioid tumors (median size: 2.8 cm). Positive peritoneal cytology result (hazard ratio [HR], 35.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1095.64; P = 0.0428), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI) (HR, 52.08; 95% CI, 12.35–219.61; P < 0.001), and FIGO (Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IV (HR, 138.33; 95% CI, 17.38–1101.05; P < 0.001) were predictors of RFS. Similarly, depth of myometrial invasion ≥ 1/2 (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.46–2.19; P = 0.995), AACCI (HR, 93.63; 95% CI, 14.87–589.44; P < 0.001), and FIGO stage IV (HR, 608.26; 95% CI, 73.41–5039.66; P < 0.001) were predictors of OS. The nomograms showed good predictive capability, positive discriminative ability, and calibration (RFS: 0.895 and OS: 0.891).ConclusionThe nomograms performed well in internal validation when patients were stratified into prognostic groups, offering a personalized approach for risk stratification and treatment decision-making.

Developing a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Undergoing Pelvic Exams

Regular pelvic exams after completing cancer treatment are critical for detecting endometrial and cervical cancer recurrence. Patients report high levels of distress and pain during exams. We conducted in-depth individual interviews with patients (N = 13) and providers (N = 10) to explore patients’ pelvic exam experiences and intervention preferences. Findings suggested that most patients experience exam-related distress and pain, and a telemedicine cognitive behavioral intervention targeting anxiety and pain would be acceptable and feasible for most patients. Findings informed PEACE (Pelvic Examination and Anxiety Coping skills for Empowerment) intervention development. Formative work is described, including a conceptual model, qualitative data collection and analysis, and session content.

Optimizing patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent endometrial cancer

ObjectiveThis retrospective, multicenter, observational study aimed to refine patient selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent endometrial cancer. The objective was to identify preoperative predictors of complete cytoreduction, assess...

Overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab plus carboplatin–paclitaxel in the randomized ENGOT-EN6/GOG-3031/RUBY trial

Part 1 of the RUBY trial (NCT03981796) evaluated dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). At the first interim analysis, the trial met one of its dual primary endpoints with statistically significant progression-free survival benefits in the mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and overall populations. Overall survival (OS) results are reported from the second interim analysis. RUBY is a phase III, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Part 1 of RUBY enrolled eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent EC who were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin-paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. OS was a dual primary endpoint. A total of 494 patients were randomized (245 in the dostarlimab arm; 249 in the placebo arm). In the overall population, with 51% maturity, RUBY met the dual primary endpoint for OS at this second interim analysis, with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of death [hazard ratio (HR)= 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.89, P= 0.0020] in patients treated with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-paclitaxel alone. The risk of death was lower in the dMMR/MSI-H population (HR= 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.63, nominal P= 0.0002) and a trend in favor of dostarlimab was seen in the mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable population (HR= 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.04, nominal P= 0.0493). The safety profile for dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel was consistent with the first interim analysis. Dostarlimab in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful OS benefit in the overall population of patients with primary advanced or recurrent EC while demonstrating an acceptable safety profile.

AFT-50 EndoMAP: A phase IB/II multicohort study of targeted agents and/or immunotherapy for patients with recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EC).

TPS5642 Background: The landscape in the management of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EC) continues to evolve. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or when combined with the VEGF-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lenvatinib, have demonstrated promising response rates in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and MS-stable (MSS)/MMR-proficient (MMRp) EC, respectively. Recent studies have also shown a benefit with adding ICI to standard of care chemotherapy in the frontline setting. Pts with MSI-H/dMMR tumors seem to derive the greatest benefit. Approximately, 30% of recurrent EC pts fall into this category. Pairing ICI with targeted therapies carries the potential to elicit prolonged anti-tumor effects. Atezolizumab (Atezo) is a humanized monoclonal PD-L1 inhibitor that has demonstrated monotherapy antitumor activity in relapsed recurrent EC, and other solid tumors (e.g. NSCLC, HCC) as monotherapy and as part of combinatorial therapy. The AFT-50/EndoMAP study is a phase IB/II non-randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, multi-cohort platform trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biomarker-driven combination regimens, both with Atezo (AFT-50A) and without Atezo (AFT-50B) with biomarker-defined targeted agents in pts with recurrent or persistent EC. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or persistent EC with no more than 2 prior lines of therapy. FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) NGS assay will be used for genomic tumor profiling. In AFT-50A, pts may be eligible for one of the following doublets: Atezo+talazoparib (tumors with genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH ≥16%), Atezo+Trastuzumab emtansine (ERBB2/HER2 mutated or amplified tumors), and Atezo+Tiragolumab (MSI-H and/or TMB-H). The Atezo+bevacizumab (biomarker unmatched) and Atezo+ipatasertib (PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1-altered tumors) cohorts have completed accrual. Each cohort will enroll ~20 pts with potential adjustment to account for statistical and clinical considerations. AFT-50A pts will receive Atezo in addition to a targeted agent (per study-approved dosing schedule) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, pt withdrawal, death, or study termination. AFT-50B pts will be eligible for inavolisib (PIK3CAm/PTEN and AKT1wt-altered tumors) + letrozole or giredestrant + abemaciclib (RB1wt, estrogen receptor positive tumors). The primary endpoint for AFT-50A is confirmed overall response rate (ORR) for each arm, and for AFT-50B is 6-month progression free survival. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, duration of response, OS, safety and tolerability. As a platform study, additional arms may be added, as supported by evolving understanding of EC and molecular targets. EndoMAP is actively enrolling at 20 sites in the US with a target of 25 sites nationwide. Clinical trial information: NCT04486352 .

Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study

ObjectiveTo report long-term efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance therapy in adults with TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) who achieved partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) following chemotherapy. MethodsAnalysis of the prespecified, exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC from the phase 3 SIENDO study was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with TP53wt EC and across other patient subgroups were exploratory endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. ResultsOf the 263 patients enrolled in the SIENDO trial, 113 patients had TP53wt EC; 70/113 (61.9%) had TP53wt/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) EC, and 29/113 (25.7%) had TP53wt/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) EC. As of April 1, 2024, the median PFS (mPFS) for TP53wt patients who received selinexor compared with placebo was 28.4 versus 5.2 months (36.8-month follow-up, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27–0.73). A benefit in mPFS was seen with selinexor versus placebo regardless of MMR status (patients with TP53wt/pMMR EC: 39.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19–0.71; patients with TP53wt/dMMR EC: 13.1 vs 3.7 months, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18–1.34). Selinexor treatment was generally manageable, with no new safety signals identified. ConclusionIn the phase 3 SIENDO study, selinexor maintenance therapy showed a promising efficacy signal and a manageable safety profile in the prespecified subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC who achieved a PR or CR following chemotherapy. These results are being further evaluated in an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial (NCT05611931).

Safety and tolerability of durvalumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab ± olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in the DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 trial.

Safety and tolerability of durvalumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab ± olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in the DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 trial.

A phase II study of fulvestrant and abemaciclib in hormone receptor positive advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

A phase II study of fulvestrant and abemaciclib in hormone receptor positive advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Durvalumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) followed by durvalumab ± olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in DUO-E: Results by BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) status.

Durvalumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) followed by durvalumab ± olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in DUO-E: Results by <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> mutation (BRCAm) status.

38MO Progression-free survival (PFS) in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the overall and mismatch repair proficient (MMR/MSS) populations and in histological and molecular subgroups: Results from part 2 of the RUBY trial

38MO Progression-free survival (PFS) in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the overall and mismatch repair proficient (MMR/MSS) populations and in histological and molecular subgroups: Results from part 2 of the RUBY trial

37MO Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the RUBY trial: Overall survival (OS) by MMR status and molecular subgroups

37MO Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) in the RUBY trial: Overall survival (OS) by MMR status and molecular subgroups

Recurrence Rates and Patterns of Recurrence in Stage IA p53abn Endometrial Cancer With and Without Myometrial Invasion

(Abstracted from Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024;0:1–6) Endometrial cancer can be classified at the molecular level to categorize tumors with important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. The copy number high group is characterized by a very high number of somatic copy number alterations, low mutation rate, and frequent TP53 mutations.

A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter study of nab-sirolimus plus letrozole in advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial cancer.

TPS5640 Background: This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the antitumor activity of nab-sirolimus in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). Despite recent pivotal data demonstrating improved outcomes with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, regardless of mismatch repair status, alternative nonchemotherapy-based treatment options for patients with advanced or recurrent EEC remain necessary. Dysregulation of mTOR signaling is implicated in the pathology of EEC, in which &gt;80% harbor PTEN or PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway alterations. Moreover, crosstalk between mTOR and estrogen receptor signaling pathways is associated with endocrine therapy resistance. GOG-3007 and other phase 2 studies have demonstrated that the combination of conventional mTOR inhibitors (mTORis) and endocrine therapy provides clinical benefit in patients with EEC. nab-Sirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor that uses albumin-bound sirolimus nanoparticles given by IV and is approved by the US FDA for malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Preclinical data of nab-sirolimus demonstrated improved tumor accumulation, mTOR inhibition, and tumor growth suppression compared with conventional mTORis. We hypothesize that the simultaneous inhibition of mTOR and ER with nab-sirolimus and letrozole, respectively, may provide a signal of synergistic antitumor activity in patients with recurrent EEC. Methods: In this phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT05997017), nab-sirolimus (100 mg/m2, intravenous, on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle) and letrozole (2.5 mg, oral, daily) are administered to patients (~29 planned, Simon’s 2-stage design) with clinically confirmed, advanced, or recurrent EEC. Eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, ≤1 prior chemotherapy-based regimen in the advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting, prior adjuvant chemotherapy is permitted, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1, naive to mTORi, and measurable disease (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1). The primary endpoint is best overall response rate by RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate (defined as complete response plus partial response plus stable disease of ≥12 weeks after start of treatment), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include correlation of baseline molecular biomarkers with clinical outcomes. The trial is open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT05997017 .

Chemotherapy plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chemotherapy plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Benmelstobart (TQB2450) combined with anlotinib hydrochloride capsule in the treatment of advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer: A multicohort, open label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (TQB2450-II-08).

Benmelstobart (TQB2450) combined with anlotinib hydrochloride capsule in the treatment of advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer: A multicohort, open label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (TQB2450-II-08).

Vaginal lacerations during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and local recurrence risk.

Vaginal lacerations during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and local recurrence risk.

A phase 1/2 study of ubamatamab (REGN4018), a MUC16×CD3 bispecific antibody, administered alone or in combination with cemiplimab (anti–PD-1) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer or MUC16+ endometrial cancer.

TPS5632 Background: Mucin 16 (MUC16) is a cell surface glycoprotein that is overexpressed in ovarian cancer (OC) and endometrial cancer (EC). Ubamatamab is a MUC16 × cluster of differentiation 3 (MUC16×CD3) bispecific antibody that bridges MUC16 on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells to promote T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity. Cemiplimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor, enhanced MUC16×CD3 activity in preclinical models. In Phase 1 of this first-in-human study (NCT03564340), ubamatamab alone and in combination with cemiplimab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, durable clinical activity across a range of doses, and linear pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients (pts) with recurrent OC (Liu et al. IGCS 2023. Plenary 03). Phase 2 will assess the efficacy of ubamatamab alone and in combination with cemiplimab in pts with recurrent OC. Ubamatamab will also be evaluated for recurrent advanced or metastatic EC that is MUC16+. Methods: For individuals with recurrent OC, elevated serum cancer antigen (CA)-125 ≥2× the upper limit of normal, and up to four prior lines of cytotoxic therapy, weekly dosing of ubamatamab alone or in combination with cemiplimab will be evaluated in monotherapy and combination therapy expansion cohorts. A Phase 2 cohort will also be randomized 1:1:1 to receive ubamatamab 250 mg IV Q3W or 800 mg IV Q3W or ubamatamab 250 mg IV Q3W + cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. For the EC cohort (≥25% of tumor cells MUC16+, as assessed by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) pts with advanced or metastatic EC that has progressed or is recurrent after prior anti–PD-1 therapy and prior platinum-based chemotherapy will be enrolled. The initial EC cohort will receive ubamatamab 250 mg IV Q3W. Based upon observed safety and activity, additional cohorts may be enrolled to receive ubamatamab 800 mg IV Q3W and/or ubamatamab 250 mg IV Q3W + cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. To limit the risk of cytokine release syndrome, all pts will receive ubamatamab once-weekly step-up dosing prior to addition of cemiplimab and/or Q3W dosing. Expansion cohorts will use a Simon 2-stage study design, with an interim analysis after the first 20 pts. Any treatment arm with ≥3 objective responses may be expanded to 50 pts. In Phase 2, the primary endpoint will be the objective response rate for each arm (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include duration of response and progression-free survival, safety, PK, and change from baseline in quality of life. Exploratory objectives include clinical correlation with serum CA-125, MUC16 IHC, and immune markers. The study is currently enrolling to these OC and EC expansion cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT03564340 .