Recurrent Disc Herniation Research Articles

Long-term outcome of redo discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniations.

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is an important cause of morbidity and healthcare costs. The goal of this investigation is to assess surgical outcomes and their predictors in patients who underwent revision discectomy for RLDH, with a minimum follow-up of ten years, to shed light on the best treatment to offer to these patients. Patients who underwent revision discectomy to treat RLDH between 2004 and 2011 in our Department were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected. The need of third intervention for RLDH was the primary outcome. Patient's satisfaction, Core Outcome Measures Index, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQoL-5D scores were also evaluated. This study includes 55 patients, with a mean follow-up time of 144months [112-199]. In this period, a third intervention was needed in 30.9% (n = 17) of patients. Most recurrences took place in the first 2years after the second surgery (58.8%, n = 10) and the risk of needing a third surgery decreased over time. After 5years, the probability of not having surgery for recurrence was 71% [CI 95%: 60-84%], with a tendency to stabilize after that. An interval between the first discectomy and the surgery for recurrence shorter than 7.6months was identified as a predictor for a second recurrence. The risk of needing a third surgery seems to stabilize after five years. Patients with an early recurrence after the first discectomy seem to have a higher risk of a new recurrence, so an arthrodesis might be worth considering.

Efficacy of Transforaminal Steroid Block for Pain Relief Due to Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation in Previously Operated Case of Lumbar Discectomy

Background: lower Back discomfort as a result of a herniated disc is quite prevalent worldwide, frequently resulting in missed work days and significant changes in affect and motivation. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common problem faced after a lumbar discectomy, most frequently seen among male gender, tall-heighted individuals, heavy workers, obese and smokers. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory medication is the initial course of treatment. But in the majority of instances, it progresses slowly and calls for surgical intervention or minimally invasive treatments like steroid injections. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine whether transforaminal steroid block can be attempted before surgery for pain relief in cases of recurrent herniated lumbar disc with failed conservative management having intractable radicular pain. Materials & Methods: Use of transforaminal selective nerve root block (SNRB) in single level recurrent lumbar disc herniation patients was studied. 40 patients with single lumbar disc herniation, operated with discectomy were studied irrespective of age and sex. All patients were injected with a combination of long acting steroid suspension with local anaesthetic (Bupivacaine-plain) near the affected nerve root via cambins triangle approach and the results were analysed. Result: Those graded mild, were pain free for up to an average of 5.5 months and those graded moderate had 3.3 months of relief. Patients suffering from extensive disc prolapse had immediate post procedural relief but not in long term. 47.5% patients have had a pain free interval upto 6 months. Conclusion: Transforaminal SNRB is an excellent alternative for pain relief in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation having failed conservative management with intractable lumbar radicular pain. It was also found to be a cost effective alternative and relatively less invasive, with almost no complication. Keywords: Selective nerve root block, Disc prolapse, Recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Comparison of Single Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for Treatment of Early and Late Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.

To compare the results of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) for pain reduction in ipsilateral early recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) with ipsilateral late RLDH. A total of 738 patients complaining of radicular pain due to ipsilateral early and late RLDH were assessed. Of these, TESI was administered to 390 subjects for ipsilateral early RLDH and 346 for ipsilateral late RLDH. TESIs were performed based on radicular leg pain; all subjects were followed up and reexamined after 12 weeks of the therapy. Pre- and postprocedural visual analog scale (VAS) scores and all complications were recorded for the study. For radicular pain, the mean pre-, and postprocedural VAS scores for ipsilateral early RLDH were 85.44 ± 6.85 and 20.16 ± 3.77 respectively. For late RLDH, the mean pre-, and postprocedural VAS scores were 72.82 ± 5.12 and 30.87 ± 4.17, respectively. A significant statistical difference for pre- and postprocedural VAS scores were observed between ipsilateral early and late recurrent disc herniation TESI groups (p < 0.05). TESI was more effective for early RLDH than for late RLDH during the 12-week follow-up period.

INTERLAMINAR ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY - CLINICAL OUTCOME

ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with lumbar disc herniation (HDL) operated by endoscopic interlaminar microdiscectomy. We evaluated epidemiology, time to return to work, and technique-related complications as secondary outcomes. Method: Prospective longitudinal study, where patients with HDL with surgical indications were evaluated. They underwent endoscopic discectomy exclusively using the interlaminar technique. Clinical results were evaluated using the Oswestry 2.0 questionnaire (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). In this study, we inserted the Macnab postoperative satisfaction index. In parallel with these indices, we analyzed the results regarding epidemiology variables, time to return to work, and complications. Such questionnaires were applied preoperatively, postoperatively the day after surgery, and one year after. Results: In 132 patients selected for the study, we obtained significant clinical improvement in the ODI and VAS questionnaires, and 81.3% of the patients had excellent and good Macnab index. The hospital stay was 22.7 hours, and the return to work was 30 days. The rate of complications with the method was 12.8%, with recurrence of disc herniation being the most common complication with 9.8% of cases. Conclusion: The endoscopic technique proved effective in treating lumbar spinal disc herniation with significant clinical improvement in the analyzed period, low incidence of complications, early postoperative rehabilitation, and results close to or superior to the gold standard technique. Level of Evidence III; Prospective cohort study

Intraoperative anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: An RCT

Intraoperative anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: An RCT

Variability in the indications for recurrent lumbar disc herniation among spine surgeons : A 16-nation survey among 515 surgeons

Variability in the indications for recurrent lumbar disc herniation among spine surgeons : A 16-nation survey among 515 surgeons

Cross-Sectional Study of Recurrent Disc Herniation Risk Factors and Predictors of Outcomes After Primary Lumbar Discectomy: A STROBE Compliance

Cross-Sectional Study of Recurrent Disc Herniation Risk Factors and Predictors of Outcomes After Primary Lumbar Discectomy: A STROBE Compliance

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation: Using the survival analysis.

This study compared the risk of symptomatic recurrent disc herniation and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) versus open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for lumbar disc herniation with 2 years of follow-up. We analyzed 23 patients who underwent PELD and 32 patients who underwent OLM for lumbar disc herniation. The numeric rating scale of back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were assessed before and at 12 and 24 months after the surgery. The wound pain and complications were also recorded. Survival analysis was performed to estimate the risk of symptomatic recurrent disc herniation. In the comparison of groups, the reductions in back and leg pain, ODI, and RMDQ were not significantly different at 12 and 24 months. For patients who underwent PELD, the wound pain was significant lower at the day of surgery. The survival rate of patients who were free from symptomatic recurrent disc herniation at 24 months was 0.913 in PELD and 0.875 in OLM, and the log-rank test revealed no significant difference between the two survival curves. The incidence of complication was not significantly different between groups. Both PELD and OLM are effective treatments for lumbar disc herniation because they have similar clinical outcomes. PELD provided patients with less painful wounds. The survival analysis revealed that the risk of symptomatic recurrent disc herniation in 2 years of follow-up was not different between PELD and OLM.

General vs Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review. It remains unknown whether general anesthesia (GA) or local ± epidural anesthesia (LA) results in superior outcomes with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). The present study sought to examine the impact of anesthesia type on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications with PELD. Systematic review and meta-analysis examining PELD performed under GA or LA was conducted. Patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-leg/back, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Complication, recurrent disc herniation, durotomy, and reoperation rates as well as surgical data were recorded. All outcomes were compared between pooled studies examining GA or LA. Sixty-eight studies consisting of 5269 patients (724GA, 4465 LA) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall complication rate was significantly higher in the GA group (9% vs 4%, P = .003). Durotomy rates, length of stay, recurrent disc herniation and reoperation rates were similar between groups. At the first follow-up timepoint, the LA group demonstrated significant improvements in VAS back and ODI scores (P < .05) while the GA group did not (P > .05). At the final follow-up (> 6months), the percent of patients achieving an excellent McNab score was significantly higher in the GA vs LA group (P < .001). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with LA may be associated with greater short-term improvement in VAS back pain and ODI scores. General anesthesia may be associated with more durable pain relief but a higher complication rate. Further systematic investigation is necessary to determine what short and long term benefits are associated with PELD performed under LA and GA.

Condoliase therapy for lumbar disc herniation -2 year clinical outcome-

BackgroundCondoliase-induced chemonucleolysis is a less invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH); however, its long-term clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated 2-year clinical outcomes and assess radiographs after chemonucleolysis with condoliase. MethodsWe enrolled patients with LDH who received condoliase therapy, with a minimum follow-up period of two years. Sixty-seven patients (44 men, 23 women; mean age, 46.7 ± 18.0 years) were analyzed. Time-course changes in disc height, disc degeneration, and herniation size were assessed. For clinical outcomes assessment, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were obtained at baseline and the 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups. We obtained a questionnaire from these patients at two years to assess satisfaction and recommendation. Condoliase therapy was considered to be effective in patients whose VAS score for leg pain improved by ≥ 50% at 2 years from baseline and who did not require surgery. ResultsCondoliase therapy was effective in 51 patients (76.1%). Eight patients (11.9%) required surgery due to ineffectiveness of the therapy. Condoliase therapy was ineffective in five out of six patients with a history of discectomy. The ODI and VAS scores for leg and back pain significantly improved from three months to two years. Of the patients, 80% satisfied with their outcomes, and 85% recommended this therapy. Progression of disc degeneration was observed in 57.1% of patients at three months; however, 30% recovered to baseline at two years. The mean disc height decreased at three months, but recovered slightly at one year and remained stable until two years. No recurrent disc herniation was observed. ConclusionsChemonucleolysis with condoliase was effective in 78% of patients with LDH for 2 years. Chemonucleolysis-induced disc degeneration was slightly recovered and maintained for two years post-injection. This treatment resulted in high patient satisfaction and recommendations.

Early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

To analyze the early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBED) combined with annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The clinical data of 19 patients with LDH treated with UBED and annulus fibrosus suture between October 2020 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 7 females with an average age of 39.1 years (range, 26-59 years). The operative segment was L 4, 5 in 13 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 6 cases. The mean disease duration was 6.7 months (range, 3-15 months). Preoperative neurological examination showed that muscle strength, sensation, and tendon reflex weakened or disappeared in varying degrees. Single annulus fibrosus suture (14 cases) or anchor assisted annulus fibrosus suture (5 cases) was selected according to the location of annulus fibrosus tears. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the low back and leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the function recovery of lumbar spine before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation. At 3 days and 3 months after operation, MRI was used to examine the removal of nucleus pulposus and decompression of nerve root. MacNab criteria was used to evaluate the effectiveness at 6 months after operation and the recovery of nerve root function was recorded. All operations were successfully completed with a mean operation time of 52.7 minutes (range, 40-75 minutes). There was no complication such as nerve injury, spinal cord hypertension syndrome, or dural sac tear during operation, and no complication such as infection, aggravation of nerve damage, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage after operation. All the patients were followed up 6-10 months (mean, 8.2 months). Postoperative MRI showed that the herniated disc was completely removed and nerve roots were fully decompressed. During the follow-up, there was no recurrence of disc herniation. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and those at 6 months after operation further improved than those at 3 days and 3 months after operation, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, MacNab standard was used to evaluate the effectiveness, and the results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 94.7%. Neurological examination showed that the sensation and muscle strength of the affected nerve root innervated area recovered significantly when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); the recovery of tendon reflex was not obvious, showing no significant difference when compared with that before operation ( P>0.05). UBED combined with annulus fibrosus suture is a safe and effective technique for LDH and early effectiveness is satisfactory.

How I do it: biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been popularized as an alternative to microscopic lumbar discectomy, it has been reported to be associated with a re-herniation rate of 5-11%. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) might occur not only at the same level previously operated upon but also at the annular penetration site created during PELD procedures. Biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach (BE-Para) was used for revisional foraminal lumbar discectomy. Procedures and some discussions regarding indications, advantages, potential complications, and ways to avoid complications were described. BE-Para may be an effective modality for RLDH after PELD.

Clinical efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar degenerative diseases: A minimum 6-year follow-up.

BackgroundTransforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (TELD) is widely applied for lumbar degenerative disease (LDDs) and satisfactory short-term outcomes have been achieved. However, the mid-term and long-term follow-up of this technique is still lacking.ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the mid-term clinical efficacy of TELD for single-level LDD and its effect on intervertebral disc degeneration with a minimum of 6-year follow-up.Methods64 patients with single-level LDDs (lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis) who underwent TELD under local anesthesia in our department from December 2014 to December 2015 were observed. Visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association evaluation treatment (JOA) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were calculated and compared before operation, 3 months after operation, 6 months after operation, 1 year after operation and at the last follow-up. Disc Height (DH), disc range of motion (ROM) and disc degeneration on standard lumbar lateral radiographs before operation and at the last follow-up were determined. Recurrence rate and operation-related complications during follow-up were recorded.Results64 cases were followed up for 6.4 ± 0.1 years. There were no complications such as infection, epidural hematoma and nerve root injury. 1 patient (1.67%) was found to have dural rupture and cauda equina hernia during the operation. There were significant differences in VAS, JOA, ODI between preoperative and postoperative 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and last follow-up (P < 0 01), VAS, JOA, ODI at 3 months after operation were different from 6 months after operation (P < 0 05), and there were significant differences compared with preoperative, 1 year after operation and last follow up (P < 0 01). VAS, JOA and ODI at 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation (P < 0.01), but not significantly different from those at 1 year after operation and the last follow-up (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in DH, ROM and the Pfirrmann grade of intervertebral disc preoperative and the last follow-up. During the follow-up period, 3 patients (4.69%) were recurrent, 13 patients (20.31%) had various degrees of postoperative dysesthesia (POD), and 3 patients (4.69%) had various degrees of muscle weakness.ConclusionTELD has a satisfactory mid-term efficacy, and has no significant effect on the DH, the stability of the intervertebral disc space, or on intervertebral disc degeneration. However, as expected, TELD was associated with some complications including recurrent disc herniation and POD.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-analysis.

Objective To evaluate the incidence and safety of clinical complications associated with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) by meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for clinical studies on complications related to the treatment of RLDH with PELD. The search time extended from the databases' inception until May 2021. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis after two researchers independently scanned the literature, gathered data, and assessed the bias risk of the included studies. Results A total of 8 clinical studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial and 7 cohort studies including 906 individuals, were included. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the overall complications (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.83, p = 0.03) and dural tear rates (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01-0.92, p = 0.04) of PELD were lower than those of traditional fenestration nucleus pulposus removal. Moreover, the PELD group had a greater recurrence rate compared to the MIS-TLIF group (OR = 19.71, 95% CI: 3.68-105.62, p = 0.0005), and the difference was statistically significant. However, compared with MED and MIS-TLIF, there were no significant differences in the incidence of overall complications, dural tear, nerve root injury, and incomplete nucleus pulposus removal (P > 0.05). Conclusion PELD is an effective and safe method for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation, with a lower incidence of complications and higher safety profile than traditional fenestration nucleus pulposus removal.

Factors associated with the recurrence of lumbar disk herniation: non-biomechanical–radiological and intraoperative factors

ABSTRACT Background Recurrent lumbar disk herniation (RLDH) is one of the most undesirable complications following lumbar discectomy (LD). This study aimed to prospectively investigate the non-biomechanical–radiological and intraoperative factors affecting the recurrence after discectomy. Patients and Methods Data of 988 consecutive patients with Lumbar disk herniation (LDH) who underwent LD at our department for over 2 years (2014–2015) were prospectively collected. Patients who met our study criteria were included (n = 816). Patients were divided into the following groups; group 1 included patients with symptomatic RLDH within the first postoperative 2 years (PO24M), group 2 included patients with symptomatic RLDH after PO24M, and group 3 included patients without symptomatic RLDH/LDH. The preoperative non-biomechanical–radiological, surgical, and intraoperative characteristics were compared among the groups. Results A total of 842 LDHs in 816 (386 men and 430 women) patients received LD. The mean age was 46.9 years. The mean follow-up period was 72.8 months. The first recurrence rates within the first PO24M and after PO24M were 7.1% and 3.2%, respectively. Disks with Modic changes type-II and contained disks without fragments were associated with the short- and long-term RLDH [(p = 0.004; HR = 0.6); (p < 0.0001; HR = 0.14)] and [(p = 0.041; HR = 0.6); (p < 0.0001; HR = 0.16)], respectively. Conclusions Several radiological, surgical, and intraoperative factors can play a critical role in RLDH; therefore, the selection criteria of patients with LDH should be carefully considered for surgical treatment to obtain acceptable outcomes. Abbreviations ANOVA: A one-way analysis of variance, CIs: 95% confidence intervals, HR: Hazard ratio, LD: Lumbar discectomy, LDH: Lumbar disc herniation, LF: ligamentum flavum, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, MC-I: Modic changes type I, MC-II: Modic changes type II, MC-III: Modic changes type III, n: Number, ODI: Oswestry Disability Index, OR: Odds ratio, p-value: Probability value, PO: Postoperative, Pre: Preoperative, Pts: Patients, RLDH: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation, RR: Relative/risk ratio, SPSS: Statistical package for the social science, T1WIs: T1-weighted images, T2WIs: T2-weighted images, VAS: Visual analog scale.

Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis.

PurposeWe aimed to comprehensively analyze the current status, hotspots, and trends in full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) research using bibliometric analysis and knowledge domain mapping.MethodsThe Web of Science database was used to screen FESS-related articles published between January 1, 1993 and June 10, 2022. The evaluation involved the following criteria: total number of articles; H-index; and contributions from countries/regions, institutions, journals, and authors.ResultsA total of 1,064 articles were included. Since 2016, there have been a significant number of publications in the field of FESS. The country/region contributing the largest number of articles was China (37.8%), followed by South Korea (24%), the United States (16.1%), Japan (5.7%), and Germany (5.1%). South Korea (35) had the highest H-index, followed by the United States (27), China (22), Japan (21), and Germany (20). World Neurosurgery (15.7%) published the largest number of FESS-related articles. However, among the top 10 most cited articles, six were published in Spine. The author who contributed the most was S.H. Lee (5.4%), and the largest number of contributions in this field originated from Wooridul Spine Hospital (South Korea; 6.1%). Notably, six of the 10 most published authors in this field were from South Korea. Of the top five productive institutions, three were from South Korea. The keywords with the strongest citation bursts in the field of FESS were “lumbar spine,” “discectomy,” “interlaminar,” “surgical technique,” “follow-up,” “excision,” “thoracic spine,” and “endoscopic surgery.” The 10 clusters generated in this study were: “endoscopic discectomy” (#0), “thoracic myelopathy” (#1), “recurrent lumbar disc herniation” (#2), “low back pain” (#3), “cervical vertebrae” (#4), “lumbar spinal stenosis” (#5), “transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion” (#6), “radiation exposure” (#7), “management” (#8), and “lumbar spine” (#9).ConclusionGlobal research on FESS is mostly concentrated in a few countries/regions and authors. South Korea has made the largest contribution to the field of FESS. Based on the most cited keyword bursts and clusters, the focus of FESS research was found to include its indications, management, and applications.

Spinal Morphometry As A Novel Predictor For Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Requiring Revision Surgery: Results of A Case Control Study.

There is conflicting data on the risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH). Most of the predictors for rLDH identified so far are acquired risk factors or radiological factors at the level of the herniation. Whole lumbar spine (WLS) morphometry has not been evaluated as a possible predictor of rLDH. We aimed to evaluate if preoperative spinal morphometry can predict the occurrence of rLDH requiring revision surgery. This retrospective case-control study on 250 patients included 45 patients operated for rLDH, 180 controls without rLDH who had previously undergone microdiscectomy for a single level lumbar disc prolapse, and a holdout validation set of 25 patients. Morphometric variables related to the WLS were recorded in addition to previously identified predictors of rLDH. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of rLDH. LR yielded four predictors of which two were WLS morphometric variables. While increasing age and smoking positively predicted rLDH, increasing WLS interfacet distance and WLS dural-sac circumference negatively predicted rLDH. The LR model was statistically significant, χ2 (4) =15.98, P = 0.003, and correctly classified 80.3% of cases. On validation, the model demonstrated a fair accuracy in predicting rLDH (accuracy: 0.80, AUC: 0.70). Larger mean lumbar bony canals and dural sacs protect from the occurrence of symptomatic rLDH. These WLS morphometric variables should be included in future risk stratification algorithms for lumbar disc disease. In addition to the previously recognized risk factors, our study points to an underlying developmental predisposition for rLDH.

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) have been commonly demonstrated as two effective choices for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of PELD and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of single-segment LDH. Randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies published from the time when databases were built to January 2022 that compared the effects of PELD and MIS-TLIF for single-segment LDH were retrieved from a comprehensive search in six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase databases, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CNKI). All analyses were performed with RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 9 studies with 1274 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the PELD group was associated with lower visual analog scales (VAS) score for back pain at the final follow-up (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.14], p=0.008), higher Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (MD: 2.29; 95% CI: [1.38, 3.19], p<0.00001), lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (MD: -2.46; 95% CI: [-4.50, -0.43], p=0.02), shorter operation time at 3 months (MD: -51.77; 95% CI: [-74.63, -28.91], p<0.00001) and lesser hospital stay (MD: -5.18; 95% CI: [-6.65, -3.71], p<0.00001), and less blood loss (MD: -187.13; 95% CI: [-281.45, -92.81], p=0.0001). However, it was associated with a higher rate of recurrent disc herniation (RR: 17.66; 95% CI: [4.25,73.44], p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between PELD and MIS-TLIF in VAS leg pain (MD: 0.12; 95% CI: [-0.24, 0.49], p=0.51), and complication rate (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.45, 1.12], p=0.14). The existing evidence showed that PELD had significantly better outcomes than MIS-TLIF in JOA score at six months, operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay as a procedure for LDH, but it had a higher recurrence rate than MIS-TLIF. Meanwhile, we should have a good command of the pros and cons of the two surgical methods to formulate an appropriate surgical plan for the patients.

Surgical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Early Adoption Phase.

Background We adopted full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) in 2019 with the assistance of the Japanese Society for Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Techniques of Spinal Neurosurgery (JASMETS). This study analyzed short-term outcomes in our initial FELD cases and compared them with microdiscectomy cases performed during the same period. Methods FELD was performed in 21 patients over a period of 2 years and 6 months (15 men and 6 women; mean age, 57.0±17.0 years). The transforaminal approach was performed in 8 patients, the posterolateral approach in 3, and the interlaminar approach in 10. During the same period, microdiscectomy was performed in 30 patients. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, operation time, blood loss volume, complications, and incidence of lumbar disc herniation recurrence were compared between the groups. Results Preoperative VAS and JOA scores did not significantly differ between the FELD and microdiscectomy groups. JOA and VAS scores significantly improved in both groups after surgery. Operation time and incidence of recurrence rate did not differ. Conclusion Spine surgeons who adopt FELD can achieve good surgical outcomes similar to those of microdiscectomy, even in the early period. Participation in JASMETS seminars and training and proctoring by a certified endoscopic spine surgeon were instrumental in our experience.

Earlier or heavier spinal loading is more likely to lead to recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical features of and risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in our clinical practice.MethodsA total of 942 consecutive patients who underwent single-level PELD from January 2013 to August 2019 were included. Patients were divided into the recurrence group and the nonrecurrence group. Patient characteristics, radiographic parameters and surgical variables were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were adopted to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PELD.ResultsThe prevalence of rLDH was 6.05%. Age, sex, tobacco use, duration of low back pain, body mass index (BMI), occupational lifting, herniated disc type, facet joint degeneration, operation time and time to ambulation were significantly different between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that age (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.019), BMI (P = 0.001), current smoking (P < 0.001), occupational lifting (P < 0.001), facet joint degeneration (P = 0.001), operation time (P = 0.002), and time to ambulation (P < 0.001) could be significantly associated with the incidence of rLDH after PELD. Multivariate analysis suggested that an older age (P < 0.001), the male sex (P = 0.017), a high BMI (P < 0.001), heavy work (P = 0.003), grade II facet joint degeneration (P < 0.001) and early ambulation (P < 0.001) were significantly related to rLDH after PELD.ConclusionsAn older age, the male sex, a higher BMI, heavy work, grade II facet joint degeneration, and early ambulation are independent significant risk factors for rLDH after PELD. Great importance should be attached to these risk factors to prevent rLDH. We suggest that patients control their weight, avoid heavy work, ambulate at an appropriate time, and perform strengthening rehabilitation exercises to reduce the incidence of rLDH.