Recurrence Score Research Articles

Abstract PO2-01-13: Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Characterization of Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Young Women

Abstract Introduction Premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) face a significantly higher risk of cancer recurrence and mortality compared to older women, particularly those diagnosed under the age of 40. The underlying causes behind this disparity remain largely unknown. Material and methods We retrospectively select tumour samples from patients (pts) diagnosed with HR+/HER2- EBC at Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) from May 2014 to March 2020 who had a PAM50/Prosigna assay (Veracyte) previously performed. This assay examines the expression of 50 genes involved in important breast cancer signaling pathways, as well as the intrinsic subtypes (IS) and the Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score. Our primary objective was to compare the distinct clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of HR+/HER2- EBC between two age groups: patients under 40 years old (Young EBC or YEBC) and those 40 years old and above (Older EBC or OEBC). Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time between diagnosis and the first recurrence. Comparisons between groups were carried out using chi-square tests (categorical variables). Additionally, we performed a two-class unpaired Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) with a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 5% to identify genes with significantly different expression between YEBC and OEBC. The statistical significance level was set at less than 0.05. Results A total of 441 tumor samples from 420 patients were included in the analysis, with 5% (22/441) corresponding to YEBC. With a median follow-up of 64.5 months, there were 20 breast cancer (BC) recurrences (4.8%), 12 second cancers (2.9%) and 5 BC-related deaths (1.2%), all occurring in the OEBC group. Table 1 provides an overview of the main clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics. YEBC tended to have larger tumors, with 45.5% (10/22) measuring over 2 cm compared to 36.1% (151/419) in OEBC (p=0.376). YEBC also had a higher proportion of grade 3 tumors (18.18% versus 3.1% in OEBC, p=0.418) and lower expression of estrogen receptor (ER) as determined by immunohistochemistry (mean of 72.28% vs 88.36%, p=0.004). Regarding the PAM50 IS, there was a difference observed between YEBC and OEBC (p < 0.001). Specifically, YEBC patients exhibited a tendency towards a higher proportion of Luminal B tumors (54.6% versus 38.9% in OEBC, p=0.144), as well as non-Luminal subtypes such as Basal-like (18.2% versus 0.95% in OEBC, p< 0.001) and HER2E (4.6% versus 0.7% in OEBC, p=0.186). YEBC tended to have higher ROR (p=0.167), and to receive chemotherapy in a higher proportion, especially in the intermediate-risk group (p=0.004). In YEBC tumours, SAM analysis (p < 0.05) showed an overexpression of genes mainly related with proliferation (i.e., RRM2, MELK, MIK67), cell cycle progression (i.e., KNTC2, CDC20, MYBL2) and apoptosis inhibition (i.e., BIRC5). In OEBC there were an overexpression of genes related with the oestrogen receptor-signalling pathway (i.e., ESR1, NAT1, FOXA1, PGR). Luminal B tumours in YEBC showed an upregulation of genes related to proliferation, migration, and poor prognosis (i.e., KRT17, KRT5) compared to OEBC. However, since there were no recurrences in the YEBC group, differences in terms of DFS between the groups could not be calculated. Principio del formulario Final del formulario Conclusions YEBC exhibited a more advanced stage and a more aggressive intrinsic phenotype compared to OEBC. Additionally, these tumors showed a tendency to upregulate genes involved in proliferation, cell cycle progression, and survival, while downregulating genes related to hormone signaling pathways. These molecular characteristics may help explain the worse prognosis of YEBC compared to OEBC. However, further research is necessary to delve into the differential genomic characteristics that contribute to the unfavorable prognosis observed in patients diagnosed with HR+ EBC before the age of 40. Key clinical and molecular features in 441 biopsies Citation Format: Francisco Javier Muñoz-Carrillo, José Antonio Sola, Carme Crous, Esther Sanfeliu, Isabel Garcia-Fructuoso, Elia Seguí, Teresa Gorría, Raquel Gómez-Bravo, Barbara Adamo, Tomás Pascual, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Francesco Schettini, Pablo Rivera, Rosalía Cayuela, Montserrat Muñoz, Núria Chic, Maria Vidal. Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Characterization of Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Young Women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-01-13.

Abstract PO1-02-02: Update of RSClin with extended TAILORx follow-up and development and validation of a new tool for risk of late distant recurrence

Abstract Background: RSClin® (Sparano et al J Clin Oncol 2020, PMID 33306425) is an educational tool that estimates the 10-year risk of distant recurrence (DR) and the absolute benefit of chemotherapy in HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative early breast cancer. The RSClin tool integrates the Recurrence Score® (RS) result with the clinical-pathological features tumor grade, tumor size and patient age using patient-specific meta-analysis (PSMA) applied to the NSABP B-14, TAILORx and NSABP B-20 studies. Approximately 3 years of additional follow-up data have accumulated in the TAILORx study since the RSClin tool was developed, including 50% more DR events in the RS 11-25 group (375 vs. 250), and 46% more DR events in the overall population (561 vs. 384). Methods: The RSClin tool estimates were updated to include the extended follow-up data from TAILORx. As before, the PSMA included 10,004 women with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer from the NSABP B-14 (n=577) trial receiving endocrine therapy (ET) alone and the TAILORx trial receiving ET alone (n=4854) or chemotherapy (CT) plus ET (n=4573). The baseline risk estimate used TAILORx event rates with ET alone. Since there was evidence of differing hazard ratios in years 0-5 versus 5+, models using time-varying effects were used. A patient-specific estimator of absolute CT benefit was computed by combining a PSMA estimate of the individualized relative CT effect from the TAILORx and NSABP B-20 (n=550 HER2-negative) trials with risk estimates for ET alone. Similar methods were used to develop and validate a new tool for assessing the risk of late DR (from year 5 to 10) in patients who survive DR-free for 5 years on ET alone after surgery. External validation of DR risk estimation was performed in an independent cohort of 1098 women enrolled in the Clalit Health Service registry. Results: With the updated data, the model integrating RS result with clinical-pathological features was more informative for DR risk than either RS result alone or the clinical-pathological features alone, both for 10-year DR risk and for late DR risk (likelihood ratio tests, each p≤.001). The updated 10-year RSClin risk estimates are similar to the existing RSClin tool risk estimates with slightly lower risk estimates for very high RS results and more precise estimates for mid-range RS results. The updated chemotherapy effect estimates are slightly lower than for the existing RSClin. The updated RSClin tool 10-year risk estimates were strongly associated with DR risk in the independent Clalit registry (Cox regression p< .001) and closely approximated the observed DR risk (Lin concordance 0.87). The new tool’s late DR risk estimates beyond 5 years were strongly associated with late DR risk in the Clalit registry (Cox regression p=.002) and closely approximated the observed late DR risk (Lin concordance 0.92). Conclusions: The RSClin tool 10-year DR risk estimates have been updated to incorporate extended follow-up data from the TAILORx study. A new tool for assessing late DR risk has been developed and validated that provides more prognostic information than either clinical-pathological features or genomic risk used individually. Citation Format: Joseph Sparano, Michael Crager, Robert Gray, Gong Tang, Jess Hoag, Frederick Baehner, Charles Geyer, Steven Shak, Norman Wolmark, Salomon Stemmer. Update of RSClin with extended TAILORx follow-up and development and validation of a new tool for risk of late distant recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-02-02.

Abstract PO3-28-06: YAP1 expression is a good prognostic marker of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: clinicopathologic analysis using the 21-gene recurrent score

Abstract Background: YAP1 is a downstream transcription factor of Hippo pathway and considered an oncogene in numerous solid cancers. Oncotype Dx (ODX) test is a multigene test for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) breast cancer that provides a risk score (RS), a high RS means high-risk. In this study, we investigated the relation between YAP1 expression and RS in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer and validated the clinical impact of YAP1 on breast cancer using public datasets. Methods: This retrospective study included 401 patients who received curative-purpose resection of HR+HER2- breast cancer and underwent ODX test between May 2014 and April 2020 at Gangnam Severance Hospital in Seoul, Korea. YAP1 nuclear localization was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining, and clinicopathological parameters including RS were analyzed. Clinical outcome was validated using YAP1 mRNA expression in TCGA-BRCA and METABRIC datasets. Results: High-YAP1 expression was significantly correlated with low ODX RS (OR [odds ratio] 0.373, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.198-0.703, p=0.002). High expression of YAP1 mRNA correlated with superior clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with ER-positive breast cancer (p < 0.0001, overall survival [OS] in METABRIC; p=0.00085, recurrent-free survival [RFS] in METABRIC; p=0.040, disease-free survival [DFS] in TCGA-BRCA). With different ESR1 mRNA expression thresholds and highly expressed YAP1, patients in the upper 80-, 60-, or 40 percentiles of ESR1 expression levels consistently demonstrated superior OS and RFS in METABRIC as well as DFS in TCGA-BRCA. Conclusion: YAP1 could serve as a prognostic marker as well as a therapeutic target in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer. Citation Format: Inho Park, Yangkyu Lee, Jee Hung Kim, Soong June Bae, Sung Gwe Ahn, Joon Jeong, Yoon Jin Cha. YAP1 expression is a good prognostic marker of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: clinicopathologic analysis using the 21-gene recurrent score [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-28-06.

Abstract PO4-20-03: HIPEx: Adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT; a multi-center single arm phase II clinical trial (KCSG BR 19-13)

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) patients, NCCN treatment guideline recommend 21-gene tests for decision of adjuvant chemotherapy if tumor size is over 0.5cm or node positive disease. In addition, GenesWellTM BCT is a prognostic assay that predict the risk of recurrence in patients with ER-positive HER2-negative and nodal stage 0-1 EBC. According to gene tests, EBC patients with high recurrence risk would have help from adjuvant chemotherapy to increase the rate of disease free survival but toxicities of chemotherapy are not negligible. Therefore, the effort for escaping adjuvant chemotherapy has been performed and currently CDK4/6 inhibitor would be considered as the substitute for cytotoxic chemotherapy in ER-positive HER2-negative EBC patients. Methods: HIPEx trial is a multi-center, phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy of adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative EBC with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT (NCT04247633). Eligible patients are women who received curative surgery and diagnosed as ER-positive, HER2-negative and pathologic stage T1b-T2 and/or N0-1. Clinical recurrence risk is high according to the modified Adjuvant! Online guideline and GenesWellTM BCT score is 4 or more which being genomic high risk. Other criteria include ECOG performance status ≤1, adequate organ functions and availability of an archival surgical specimens. Patients receive palbociclib 125mg once daily for 21 days of 28-day cycle plus tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole, letrozole or exemestane) once daily for every day. Palbociclib would be taken for two years and endocrine therapy for five years or more. If adjuvant radiotherapy is required, palbociclib should be taken two weeks after the end date of radiotherapy. If patients are premenopausal status, GnRH agonist is allowed. Primary endpoint is 3-year event free survival (EFS) rate of high clinical and genetic risk ER-positive EBC. Secondary endpoints include 3-year overall survival, quality of life, safety and tolerability of palbociclib with endocrine therapy as an adjuvant setting, exploratory analysis of predictive and prognostic biomarkers and the performance of GenesWellTM BCT for 3-year EFS rate. In total, 578 patients would be enrolled in this trial. Based on the previous results of GenesWell™ BCT in Korea, the 3-year EFS rate for the past control group (chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy) is 87.0% and the treatment group in this clinical trial is assumed to be 90.5%.(hazard ratio for EFS = 0.717). Null hypothesis is the 3year-EFS rate in patients received adjuvant palbociclib and endocrine therapy is not less than that of the past control group. Alternative hypothesis is the 3year-EFS rate of this trial is less than that of the past control group (one-sided). Significance level is 0.025, power is 0.80. Considering 10% drop out rate, 4-years of accrual patient enrollment and 3-years of follow up period, 578 patients were required in this clinical trial. Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Sung Hoon Sim, Jieun Lee, In Hae Park, Kyong Hwa Park, Seock-Ah Im, Jee Hung Kim, Kyoung Eun Lee, Jeong Eon Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Young Kee Shin, Yeon Hee Park. HIPEx: Adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT; a multi-center single arm phase II clinical trial (KCSG BR 19-13) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-03.

Abstract PO5-01-08: The impact of Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) expression by RT-PCR on tumor characteristics and outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative early-stage breast cancer

Abstract Background: The role of HER2 expression in HER2 negative breast cancer is evolving. Whether HER2 expression has an impact on ER positive, HER2 negative early-stage breast cancer in unclear. Oncotype DX assay Recurrence Score comprises of standardized quantitative HER2 mRNA expression levels by RT-PCR. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of Oncotype HER2 score on tumor characteristics and outcome. Methods: All women assigned to the Clalit Health Services registry between 2006 to 2011 with ER positive, HER2 negative early-stage breast cancer whose tumor were sent for oncotype were identified. Patients in which HER2 score was reported in the oncotype results were included. Differences in age, tumor characteristics and chemotherapy administration between lower HER2 score (H1), i.e. HER2 score ≤ 9.1, to higher HER2 score (H2), i.e. 9.2-10.7, were analyzed. 5-year Kaplan–Meier for distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and differences between H1 and H2 were evaluated. Analyses were repeated separately for node negative and for node positive (N mic and 1-3 lymph nodes) disease. Results: A total of 1535 patients were included, 948 patients with node negative disease and 587 with node positive disease. Of these, 814 and 721 patients were categorized to the H1 and H2 groups, respectively. Median follow-up was 5.4 years. The distribution of oncotype RS was different, with significantly lower proportion of patients with RS between 0-10 and higher proportion of RS above 25 in the H1 group compared to the H2 groups. This difference was identified both for patients with node negative and node positive disease (Table). The distributions of age, tumor size and histological subtype were comparable between the H1 and the H2 groups, both for node negative and node positive disease. Within each RS group, administration of chemotherapy was comparable between H1 and H2 groups, regardless of nodal involvement. DRFS and OS were not associated with HER2 score. For RS 0-25, node negative disease, 5-year DRFS was 96.2% in H1 and 96.4% in H2 groups (p=0.92) and 5-year OS was 97.2% in H1 and 98.1% in H2 groups (p=0.39). For RS >25, node negative disease, 5-years DRFS was 89% in H1 and 90.8% in H2 groups (p=0.33) and 5-year OS was 90.6% in H1 and 90.8% in H2 groups (p=0.7). Similarly, for node positive disease, DRFS and OS were comparable between H1 and H2 group in all subgroups. Conclusions: Low HER2 mRNA expression by Oncotype RT-PCR assay was associated with significantly high Oncotype RS. Patients' outcome was not directly affected by HER2 score and was determined by RS. Further study is desired to clarify the role of HER2 expression in early stage, luminal breast cancer. Table. Comparison of age and tumor characteristics between low (H1) and high (H2) HER2 score Citation Format: Hadar Goldvaser, Raz Mutai, Salomon Stemmer, Iryna Kuchuk, Margarita Tokar, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Rinat Yerushalmi, Karen Drumea, Ella Evron, Amir Sonnenblick, Einav Gal-Yam, Gil Bar Sela, Ayelet Shai, Rotem Merose, Avital Bareket-Samish, Lior Soussan-Gutman. The impact of Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) expression by RT-PCR on tumor characteristics and outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-01-08.

Abstract PO1-19-02: A phase III trial evaluating De-escalation of Breast Radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of stage 1, HR+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers are stage 1, with the majority being ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative. Genomic assays such as the Oncotype DX® have identified patients (pts) with reduced risk of distant metastasis and without benefit from chemotherapy added to endocrine therapy, freeing them from excess toxicity. Genomic assays are also recognized as prognostic for in-breast recurrence (IBR) after BCS and could similarly allow de-escalation of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Reducing overtreatment is of interest to pts, providers, and payers. Methods: We hypothesize that BCS alone is non-inferior to BCS plus RT for in-breast recurrence and breast preservation in women intending endocrine therapy (ET) for stage 1 invasive breast cancer (ER &/or PR positive, HER2-negative with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] of ≤18). Stratification is by age (< 60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1-2cm), and RS (< 11, 11-18). Pts are randomized post-BCS to Arm 1 with breast RT using standard methods (hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast RT with/without boost, or APBI) with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) or Arm 2 with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) alone. The specific regimen of ET in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. Eligible pts are stage 1: pT1 (≤2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to < 70 yrs, s/p BCS with negative margins (no ink on tumor), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or ALND), ER &/or PR positive (ASCO/CAP), HER2-negative (ASCO/CAP), and Oncotype DX RS of ≤18 (diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen). Primary endpoint is in-breast recurrence (invasive breast cancer or DCIS). Secondary endpoints are breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence, relapse-free interval, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to ET. We assume a clinically acceptable difference in IBR of 4% at 10 yrs to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-yr event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% vs 91.6% for the omission of RT group). BR007 is powered to detect non-inferiority with 80% power and a one-sided α=0.025, assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years (leveling off in Yrs 3-5); 1,670 pts (835 per arm) are required for randomization. Conservative loss to follow-up is 1% per yr. Some of the T1a pts screened may have Oncotype DX scores >18, making them ineligible for the study. In the accrual process, 1,714 pts will be required to register to ensure that our final randomized cohort is 1,670 pts. Current accrual (07-07-2023) is 555 screened and 488 randomized (~96% of predicted accrual). Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867, UG1CA189867; Susan G. Komen Foundation (JRW). NCT: 04852887. Citation Format: Julia White, Reena Cecchini, Eleanor Harris, Eleftherios Mamounas, Daniel Stover, Patricia Ganz, Reshma Jagsi, Stewart Anderson, Carmen Bergom, Valérie Théberge, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Richard Zellars, Dean Shumway, Guang-Pei Chen, Thomas Julian, Norman Wolmark. A phase III trial evaluating De-escalation of Breast Radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of stage 1, HR+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-02.

Abstract PO2-01-10: 21-Gene Recurrence Score Index (ONCOTYPE DX) as a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2- early stage breast cancer (EBC) has shown lower response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) compared with other clinicopathologic subtypes. ONCOTYPE DX may help inform systemic treatment decisions for EBC and predicting likelihood of pathological complete response (pCR) or chemosensitivity. We analyze the pathologic response according ONCOTYPE RS and their prognostic value. Methods: We included a serie of 139 consecutive patients with high clinical risk factor with criteria to received NCT than have performed an ONCOTYPE DX test previous to start NCT. The median age was 51 years with 65 patients (47%) less than 50 years. Median initial tumoral size was 25 mm (9-97), T1: 35%, T2: 51% and T3: 14%. 70 patients (50%) have initial axillary node involvement. Median ONCOTYPE DX score was 29 (12 – 76) , RS < 25 in 36% and RS < 30 in 54%. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was found in 35 patients (25%), and by RCB was: RCB:0 23%, RCB-1 18%, RCB-2 24% and RCB-3 34%. Results: pCR score was correlated with ONCOTYPE DX (pearson : p:0,001) , patients with ONCOTYPE RS score superior to 30 has a total of 37% of pCR in contrast to a 14% in patients with ONCOTYPE RS score less than 30. Median follow-up was 32 months (5 -100). The rate of recurrence was similar independently the ONCOTYPE RS score (12% < 30 ; 15% >30) , but patients with ONCOTYPE RS < 30 with achieve pCR had better prognostic compared to patients that not achieve pCR (0% vs 14%). Patients with ONCOTYPE RS > 30 tumors that had a pCR the recurrence rate was 8% compared to 20% in patients with non pCR. Conclusions: These data suggest ONCOTYPE DX predicts pCR in HR+HER2- BC patients, especially in patients with a RS superior to 30 with an high rate of pCR of 37%. Patients with ONCOTYPE DX less than 30 that achieved pCR had the better outcomes and patients with ONCOTYPE DX superior to 30 that not achieved pCR had the worst outcomes with a total of 20% of recurrence. ONCOTYPE DX predicts the possibility of achieve a pCR and patients with a high ONCOTYPE DX RS score with residual disease have a high recurrence despite receiving treatment with chemotherapy, which requires a better adjuvant treatment, possibly with CDK 4/6 cyclin inhibitors. Citation Format: Ariadna Gasol Cudós, Serafin Morales Murillo, Noemí Tuset Der-Abrain, Felip Vilardell Villellas, Laura Arbones Cid, Jordi Melé Olivé, Carles Canosa Morales. 21-Gene Recurrence Score Index (ONCOTYPE DX) as a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-01-10.

Abstract PO5-02-11: Is There A Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use In Elderly Breast Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study Using The National Cancer Database

Abstract Background Geriatric patients (Age >=65 years) with Breast Cancer (BC) face a unique challenge due to the relatively lower functional status, as well as co-existing comorbidities. Studies like the recently published meta-analysis by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) group provide irrefutable evidence for the recurrence free survival benefit of anthracycline and taxane based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) regimes in early-stage BC patients. However, the age range of the trials analyzed ranged between 46-55 years, with underrepresentation of the geriatric group. The question on whether ACT results in an overall survival (OS) benefit for the elderly remains at large, which we hope to answer through our study. Methods The 2019 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to extract patients aged >= 65 years with breast cancer. We included stage 1-3 patients and stratified them into those who received ACT (ACT+) and those who did not (ACT-). Patients who received ACT were identified from the columns that specified the times of events from diagnosis or from the column for systemic therapy-surgery sequence. Patients should have had definitive surgery for their BC management to be included. Odds Ratio (OR) from logistic regression was used to analyze the utility of ACT based on various factors. Kaplan Meier (KM) survival curves and Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates from multivariate cox model was used to compare OS outcomes. Results Our cohort had 866,071 (ACT+: 642721, ACT-:223350) patients. The age distribution showed that ACT+ had 86.45% in the 65-80 years group and 13.55% in the >80 years group. ACT- had 68.32% aged 65-80 and 31.68% >80 years. The distribution of various demographic, pathologic and clinical factors by ACT use are shown in Table 1. Factors associated with ACT use based on OR estimates are shown in Table 2. ACT use is more likely in younger age group (65-80), lower comorbidity score, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors, ER/PR negativity, T2 and lymph node positivity, those who underwent partial mastectomy and regional lymph node surgery, and HER2 positivity. Both 5-year (86.3 vs 74.2%) and 10-year (66 vs 50.8) OS were better with ACT+ (Table 2). The HR using propensity score (PS) weighted cox model revealed a higher hazard rate on omitting ACT [1.436, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.417,1.456, p< .0001] (Table 2). HR estimates between ACT- vs ACT+, stratified by subgroups [Age (65-80, >80), T stage, grade (G), HER2] favored ACT use in all groups except G1 tumors (Table 3). Discussion Our study using a large national database, supports the use of ACT in the geriatric BC population by showing a clear OS advantage of 15.2% at 10 years. This benefit was observed even in BC patients aged more than 80 years with a HR of 1.683 when compared to ACT-, as represented in Table 3. While the existing literature provides robust evidence for ACT use in situations such as a high oncotype recurrence score, our study provides real-world evidence from a population-based dataset to supports its use in the elderly, including those above 80 years. The geriatric assessment recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for geriatric oncology should be followed in this setting. Utilization of geriatric assessment tools among oncologists has been poor with a survey revealing that 60% of providers did not utilize these tools in making treatment decisions. Limitations of our study include the potential for missing confounding factors and the retrospective nature of the study using a large database. Table 1 Demographic, pathological, and clinical characteristics of the study population and their distribution based on ACT use. Table 2 Odds Ratio for ACT use, KM survival curves and HR estimates of ACT use Table 3 HR estimates of mortality for ACT- vs ACT+ stratified by various subgroups Citation Format: Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Metlapalli Venkata Sravanthi, Dongliang Wang, Danning Huang, Abirami Sivapiragasam. Is There A Survival Benefit With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use In Elderly Breast Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study Using The National Cancer Database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-02-11.

The added value of ultrasound imaging biomarkers to clinicopathological factors for the prediction of high-risk Oncotype DX recurrence scores in patients with breast cancer.

The Oncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score (RS), a 21-gene assay, has been proven to recognize patients at high risk of recurrence (RS ≥26) who would benefit from chemotherapy. However, it has limited availability and high costs. Our study thus aimed to identify ultrasound (US) imaging biomarkers and develop a prediction model for identifying patients with a high ODX RS. In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with T1-3N0-1M0 breast cancer who were hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative who had an available ODX RS were reviewed. Patients treated from May 2012 and December 2015 were placed into a training cohort, and those treated from January 2016 to January 2017 were placed in a validation cohort. Clinicopathologic data were collected, and preoperative US scans were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent predictors for a high-risk of breast cancer in the training cohort, and a nomogram was developed and evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 363 patients were in the training cohort and 160 in the validation cohort, with the proportion with a high RS (RS 26-100) being 14% and 13.1%, respectively. Echogenic halo, enhanced posterior echo, low level of progesterone receptor (PR), and high Ki-67 index were identified as independent risk factors for high RS (all P values <0.05). The nomogram was constructed based on the combined model, which showed a better discrimination ability than did the clinicopathological model [combined model: AUC =0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.97; clinicopathological model: AUC =0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.92; P=0.001] and greater clinical benefit according to DCA. Furthermore, the nomogram was found to be effective in the validation cohort (AUC =0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), especially in patients with stage T1N0M0 disease (AUC =0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95). US features may serve as valuable imaging biomarkers for the prediction of high recurrence risk in patients with T1-3N0-1M0 breast cancer and hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative status. A nomogram incorporating PR status, Ki-67 index, and US imaging biomarkers showed a good discrimination ability in the early selection of patients at high risk of recurrence, especially in those with stage T1N0M0 disease.

AB027. SOH24AB_074. Evaluating the association between body mass indices and the 21-gene recurrence score: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

AB027. SOH24AB_074. Evaluating the association between body mass indices and the 21-gene recurrence score: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Addressing Social Determinants in the Era of Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer: Is It Sufficient to Reduce Disparities?

The Oncotype DX (ODX) assay predicts recurrence risk and demonstrates the benefits of adjuvant therapy in patients with early-stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. ODX uptake varies by patients' racial/ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic status (SES). However, community-level variability remains unknown, and research regarding the association between testing status and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy is limited. To fill these knowledge gaps, Van Alsten and colleagues found a 6% lower prevalence of ODX uptake among patients residing in high SES-deprived areas than among those residing in low SES-deprived areas. Among patients with low and median ODX recurrence scores, those who underwent testing were 28% and 21% less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy than those who did not, respectively. The findings emphasize the role of social determinants of health. However, to further reduce or eliminate racial/ethnic disparities and SES inequities, we would need sufficient and effective multi-level approaches. These involve lower ODX testing costs, health insurance coverage expansion, re-classification and validation of ODX recurrence scores in patients of minority ancestry, and the development of a faster, more accurate, and affordable test. See related article by Van Alsten et al., p. 654.

Pembrolizumab response in stage IV luminal-type breast cancer with high microsatellite instability: a case report

BackgroundPembrolizumab (PEM), an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), is often used for triple-negative breast cancer, but can also be used to treat solid tumors that exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-High). However, patients with breast cancer rarely have MSI-High, the use of PEM in such cases in clinical practice is uncertain due to lack of sufficient supporting data. Here, we report the case of a premenopausal woman in who received PEM for MSI-High luminal-type breast cancer.Case presentationA 40-year-old premenopausal Asian woman was diagnosed with stage IIA (T2N0M0) breast cancer and had an Oncotype DX recurrence score of 38. After surgery, she received 4 courses of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. After 3 months of tamoxifen therapy, the patient complained of abdominal pain due to right iliac metastasis, and biopsy of the metastatic lesion showed of luminal type; she was sequentially treated with fulvestrant, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and an anticancer drug (TS1), but over the next year, metastasis to the bone and para-aortic lymph nodes increased. Tumor was MSI-High; PEM was started, and after three courses, bone metastases were reduced, para-aortic lymph node metastases resolved, opioids were discontinued, and the patient returned to society; PEM was administered for 1 year with no worsening of bone metastases on imaging. Asymptomatic brain metastasis less than 1 cm was detected and gamma knife was performed. Six months after completion of PEM, the patient is working with no new lesions.ConclusionWe report a case of luminal-type breast cancer with bone metastases and MSI-High, which was treated with PEM and showed a rapid therapeutic response.

Association between pathological characteristics and recurrence score by OncotypeDX in resected T1-3 and N0-1 breast cancer: a real-life experience of a North Hungarian regional center.

Introduction: The 21-gene analysis (OncotypeDX) is validated test for pT1-3, pN0-1 with hormone receptor (HR) positive and normal expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) breast cancer (BC) to determine the aggressiveness of the disease based on the calculation of Recurrence Score (RS). Methods: In this retrospective study the authors correlated pathological characteristics and Recurrence Score (RS) by traditional statistical methods and Observed Oriented Modeling (OOM) in a realistic cohort of BC patients. Results: OncotypeDX tests were performed in 94 tumour specimens of 90 BC patients. >83% of node-negative (pN0) and >72% of node-positive (pN1) cases could avoid chemotherapy. For pN0 cases, non-parametric correlation and tests demonstrated significant association in eight types of characteristics [progesterone receptor (PR) expression, Ki-67 value, Ki-67 group, PR group, grade, estrogen receptor (ER) expression, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and Clinical Risk]. For pN1 cases, parametric correlation and tests showed significant association in six characteristic types (number of positive nodes, ER and PR expression, PR group, Ki-67 group and NPI). Based on OOM for pN0 cases, significant associations were established in three characteristics (Ki-67 group, grade and NPI group). For pN1 cases OOM found significant associations in seven characteristics (PR group, PNI, LVI, Ki-67 group, grade, NPI group and number of positive nodes). Conclusion: First in oncology, OOM was applied, which found some other significant characteristics associated with RS than traditional statistical methods. There were few patients, where no clinical associations were found between characteristics and RS contrary to statistically significant differences. Therefore, the results of these statistical analyses can be neither applied for individual cases nor able to provide the bases for screening patients, i.e., whether they need for OncotypeDX testing or not. OncotypeDX still provides a personalised approach in BC.

Enhancing clinical decision support with genomic tools in breast cancer: A Scottish perspective

IntroductionThe Oncotype DX Breast RS test has been adopted in Scotland and has been the subject of a large population-based study by a Scottish Consensus Group to assess the uptake of the recurrence score (RS), evaluate co-variates associated with the RS and to analyse the effect it may have had on clinical practice.Materials & Methods: Pan-Scotland study between August 2018–August 2021 evaluating 833 patients who had a RS test performed as part of their diagnostic pathway. Data was extracted retrospectively from electronic records and analysis conducted to describe change in chemotherapy administration (by direct comparison with conventional risk assessment tools), and univariate/multivariate analysis to assess relationship between covariates and the RS. ResultsChemotherapy treatment was strongly influenced by the RS (p < 0.001). Only 30 % of patients received chemotherapy treatment in the intermediate and high risk PREDICT groups, where chemotherapy is considered. Additionally, 55.5 % of patients with a high risk PREDICT had a low RS and did not receive chemotherapy. There were 17 % of patients with a low risk PREDICT but high RS who received chemotherapy.Multivariate regression analysis showed the progesterone receptor Allred score (PR score) to be a strong independent predictor of the RS, with a negative PR score being associated with high RS (OR 4.49, p < 0.001). Increasing grade was also associated with high RS (OR 3.81, p < 0.001). Classic lobular pathology was associated with a low RS in comparison to other tumour pathology (p < 0.01). Nodal disease was associated with a lower RS (p = 0.012) on univariate analysis, with menopausal status (p = 0.43) not influencing the RS on univariate or multivariate analysis. ConclusionsGenomic assays offer the potential for risk-stratified decision making regarding the use of chemotherapy. They can help reduce unnecessary chemotherapy treatment and identify a subgroup of patients with more adverse genomic tumour biology. A recent publication by Health Improvement Scotland (HIS) has updated guidance on use of the RS test for NHS Scotland. It suggests to limit its use to the intermediate risk PREDICT group. Our study shows the impact of the RS test in the low and high risk PREDICT groups. The implementation across Scotland has resulted in a notable shift in practice, leading to a significant reduction in chemotherapy administration in the setting of high risk PREDICT scores returning low risk RS. There has also been utility for the test in the low risk PREDICT group to detect a small subgroup with a high RS.We have found the PR score to have a strong independent association with high risk RS. This finding was not evaluated by the key RS test papers, and the potential prognostic information provided by the PR score as a surrogate biomarker is an outstanding question that requires more research to validate.

Racial/ethnic differences in 21-gene recurrence score and survival among patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BackgroundDespite numerous studies on racial/ethnic disparities among patients with breast cancer, there is a paucity of literature evaluating racial/ethnic differences in 21-gene recurrence score (RS) and survival differences stratified by RS risk categories. We thus performed an observational cohort study to examine racial/ethnic disparities in the context of RS.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for female patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2018 with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, pT1-3N0-1aM0 breast cancer who received surgery followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy and had RS data available. Logistic multivariable analysis (MVA) was built to evaluate variables associated with RS ≥ 26. Cox MVA was used to evaluate OS. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences stratified by RS. P values less than 0.017 were considered statistically significant based on Bonferroni correction.ResultsA total of 140,133 women were included for analysis. Of these, 115,651 (82.5%), 8,213 (5.9%), 10,814 (7.7%), and 5,455 (3.9%) were NHW, Hispanic, Black, and API women, respectively. Median (IQR) follow up was 66.2 months (48.0–89.8). Logistic MVA showed that, compared with NHW women, Black women were associated with higher RS (≥ 26 vs < 26: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.26, p < 0.001), while HW (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00, p = 0.04) and API women (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.13, p = 0.45) were not. Cox MVA showed that, compared with NHW women, Black women had worse OS (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.19, p = 0.012), while HW (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.94, p = 0.001) and API (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001) women had better OS. In subgroup analysis, similar findings were noted among those with RS < 26, while only API women were associated with improved OS among others with RS ≥ 26.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the largest study using nationwide oncology database to suggest that Black women were associated with higher RS, while HW and API women were not. It also suggested that Black women were associated with worse OS among those with RS < 26, while API women were associated with improved OS regardless of RS when compared to NHW women.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning With Medical Management or Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a low-cost, accessible, and noninvasive neuroprotective treatment strategy, but its efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke are controversial. With the publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the recent results of the RESIST trial, it may be possible to identify the patient population that may (or may not) benefit from RIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIC in patients with ischemic stroke receiving different treatments by pooling data of all randomized controlled studies to date. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles in all languages from inception until May 25, 2023. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the specified endpoint time in the trial. The secondary outcomes were change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and recurrence of stroke events. The safety outcomes were cardiovascular events, cerebral hemorrhage, and mortality. The quality of articles was evaluated through the Cochrane risk assessment tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023430073). There were 7,657 patients from 22 RCTs included. Compared with the control group, patients who received RIC did not have improved mRS functional outcomes, regardless of whether they received medical management, reperfusion therapy with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In the medical management group, patients who received RIC had decreased incidence of stroke recurrence (risk ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92, p = 0.02) and lower follow-up NIHSS score by 1.72 points compared with the control group (p < 0.00001). There was no increased risk of adverse events including death or cerebral hemorrhage in the IVT or medical management group. In patients with ischemic stroke who are not eligible for reperfusion therapy, RIC did not affect mRS functional outcomes but significantly improved the NIHSS score at the follow-up endpoint and reduced stroke recurrence, without increasing the risk of cerebral hemorrhage or death. In patients who received IVT or MT, the benefit of RIC was not observed.

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers vs the general breast cancer population (N = 799,986): 21-gene assay-based molecular characterization

PurposeWe compared 21-gene recurrence score (RS) distribution and expression of the single-gene/gene groups within this assay between BC patients with pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1/2 vs the general 21-gene-tested BC population.MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive 21-gene-tested female ER + HER2-negative BC patients with germline PVs in BRCA1/2. RS/gene expression data were compared to a previously described commercial use database (CDB, N = 799,986). Chi-square and 1-sample t test were used to compare RS distribution and single-gene/gene group scores between the study group and the CDB.ResultsStudy group patients (N = 81) were younger and their RS results were higher compared to the CDB (age: median [IQR], 56 [47–61.5] vs 60 [51–67] years; p < 0.001; proportion of patients with RS ≥ 26: 49.4% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001). Expression of 12/16 cancer genes in the assay and the ER, proliferation, and invasion gene group scores differed significantly between the study group and the CDB, all in a direction contributing to higher RS. The differences between the study group and the CDB were mostly retained, upon stratifying the patients by menopausal status.ConclusionBC patients with PVs in BRCA1/2 have higher RS results that stem from distinct gene expression profiles in the majority of genes in the 21-gene assay.

Socioecologic Factors and Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Multigene Prognostic Scores in US Women

Disproportionately aggressive tumor biology among non-Hispanic Black women with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. It is unclear whether socioecologic factors underlie racial differences in breast tumor biology. To examine individual-level (insurance status) and contextual (area-level socioeconomic position and rural or urban residence) factors as possible mediators of racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of ER-positive breast tumors with aggressive biology, as indicated by a high-risk gene expression profile. This retrospective cohort study included women 18 years or older diagnosed with stage I to II, ER-positive breast cancer between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. All data analyses were conducted between December 2022 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the likelihood of a high-risk recurrence score (RS) (≥26) on the Oncotype DX 21-gene breast tumor prognostic genomic biomarker. Among 69 139 women (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [10.5] years; 6310 Hispanic [9.1%], 274 non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaskan Native [0.4%], 6017 non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander [8.7%], 5380 non-Hispanic Black [7.8%], and 51 158 non-Hispanic White [74.0%]) included in our analysis, non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.23-1.43) and non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native women (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.86) had greater likelihood of a high-risk RS compared with non-Hispanic White women. There were no significant differences among other racial and ethnic groups. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, there were greater odds of a high-risk RS for non-Hispanic Black women residing in urban areas (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.24-1.46), but not among rural residents (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77-1.41). Mediation analysis demonstrated that lack of insurance, county-level disadvantage, and urban vs rural residence partially explained the greater odds of a high-risk RS among non-Hispanic Black women (proportion mediated, 17%; P < .001). The findings of this cohort study suggest that the consequences of structural racism extend beyond inequities in health care to drive disparities in breast cancer outcome. Additional research is needed with more comprehensive social and environmental measures to better understand the influence of social determinants on aggressive ER-positive tumor biology among racial and ethnic minoritized women from disadvantaged and historically marginalized communities.

352 Outcomes After Microvascular Decompression for Sole Arterial Versus Venous Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia

INTRODUCTION: In most cases of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), the trigeminal nerve is compressed by the arterial vasculature. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing microvascular decompression at our institution, identifying patients with either sole arterial or venous compression. We dichotomized patients into arterial or venous groups and obtained demographics and postoperative complications for each case. Barrow Neurological Index (BNI) pain scores were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up, as well as recurrence of pain. Differences were calculated via Chi-squared tests and t-tests. Ordinal regression was used to account for variables known to influence TN pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Of 1044 patients, 642 (61.7%) had either sole arterial or venous compression. 472 of these cases demonstrated arterial compression, and 170 displayed sole venous compression. Patients in the venous compression group were significantly younger (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with sole venous compression demonstrated worse preoperative (p = 0.04) and final follow-up (p &lt; 0.001) pain scores. Patients with sole venous compression had significantly higher rate of pain recurrence (p = 0.02) and BNI score at pain recurrence (p = 0.04). On ordinal regression, venous compression was found to independently predict worse BNI pain scores (OR = 1.66, p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between sole venous compression and increased risk of pain recurrence (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: TN patients with sole venous compression demonstrate worse pain outcomes following MVD compared to those with only arterial compression.

Abstract 4975: Stretching the boundary of Oncotype DX testing

Abstract Background: The predictive value of Oncotype DX in early-stage breast cancer had been well established. Strongest data support the use of chemotherapy for Recurrence Score (RS) &amp;gt; 30, with 25-30 deriving some benefit. Those with intermediate RS 16-25 are thought to have a small benefit from chemotherapy, especially premenopausal patients. Tumor size &amp;gt;5 cm is viewed as a high-risk feature regardless of RS. Our goal is to investigate how patients with uncertainty regarding their anticipated recurrence risk were managed at our institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to explore the management of non-metastatic HER-2 negative hormone sensitive breast cancer patients diagnosed between 01/2018 &amp;12/2020 stratifying them into the following study groups of interest: premenopausal (age &amp;lt;50), RS 16-25 compared to RS 26-30 and tumor size &amp;gt;5cm. Patients were compared based on whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy or not. The primary endpoint was the rate of local recurrence. Results: The results of our analysis are illustrated in the table. Studying the premenopausal group, 91.3% had RS &amp;lt; 16; yet 35% of them received chemotherapy. Patients with RS &amp;gt; 25 represented 3.2% of the premenopausal group, 12.5% of which did not receive chemotherapy. The six recurrences in the premenopausal group were all from the RS &amp;lt;16 subgroup. Comparing the RS 26-30 to the RS 16-25 group, patients were on average older with tumors being on average smaller, yet more patients were treated with chemotherapy; and there were no recurrences noted in both subgroups. Finally, in the tumor size &amp;gt;5 cm group, 91.4% had RS &amp;lt;16, almost all were premenopausal with many patients being lymph node negative, yet more than half received chemotherapy. Conclusions: In our study we demonstrate that in certain subgroups of early-stage breast cancer there is inconsistency in clinical practice when prescribing chemotherapy to patients factoring in their Oncotype DX scores. There is need for larger trials to guide clinicians on using Oncotype DX in those subgroups of patients. Characteristics, Treatment Pattern and Outcomes of Patient Groups of Interest Characteristics Premenopausal (N=506) RS 16-25 (N=28) RS 26-30 (N=36) Tumor Size &amp;gt;5 cm (N=47) Age, Mean (SD) 42.65 (5.46) 44.71 (3.85) 63.56 (9.65) 42.02 (6.14) Age, Range 19 - 49 36 - 49 45 - 79 28 - 57 Mean Tumor Size, mm (SD) 29.66 (52.21) 29.57 (33.88) 16.88 (11.19) 83.61 (37.52) Lymph Nodes Positive, n (%) 91 (18.0%) 2 (7.1%) 0 (0.0%) 16 (34.0%) Received Chemotherapy, n (%) 184 (36.4%) 7 (25.0%) 13 (36.1%) 25 (53.2%) Local Recurrence, n (%) 6 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Mean Follow- Up, months (SD) 19.28 (8.20) 19.39 (7.07) 21.21 (11.04) 19.26 (8.93) Citation Format: Zaid Al-Saheli, Vrushali Dabak. Stretching the boundary of Oncotype DX testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4975.