Recurrence Score Testing Research Articles

Abstract P3-07-05: Correlation between and molecular drivers of oncotype DX, prosigna, EndoPredict and breast cancer index: A TransATAC study

Abstract Background: Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), Prosigna PAM50 ROR score, the EndoPredict score (EP, EPclin) and the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) all provide substantial molecular prognostic information and are used in clinical practice for guiding the treatment for large numbers of patients with primary ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Despite this, there is incomplete information on the concordance between these scores and very little understanding of the molecular features that drive the individual scores. Here we report from a unique database (i) the correlation between all 4 scores when measured by the respective manufacturers in the TransATAC set of samples and (ii) the degree to which each of the scores is driven by proliferation, oestrogen signalling, HER2 signalling and invasive properties insomuch as these are reflected by each component module of the RS test (PM, EM, HM and IM, respectively). Methods: The TransATAC tumour sample set was collected from patients in the tamoxifen or anastrozole arms from the ATAC clinical trial of 5 years of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with primary hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Cases were included if HER2- and all 4 scores were available. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. EP and ROR both include some clinical features in their final score but components were excluded for the purposes of this study. The RS module scores were provided by the manufacturer. The genes that contribute to the module scores are as follows: PM: Ki67, STK15, Survivin, CCNB1, MYBL2; EM: ER, PGR, BCL2, SCUBE2; HM: GRB7, HER2; IM: MMP11, CTSL2). Spearman rank correlation was used to study the association between molecular components. Results: Data was available for all four molecular scores for 785 TransATAC patients. Correlations were moderate to strong for RS vs EP (r=0.63), ROR vs EP (r=0.68), ROR vs BCI (r=0.74) and EP vs BCI (r=0.67) but were weak for RS vs ROR (r=0.32) and RS vs BCI (r=0.35). The correlation between each score with the RS module scores are shown in the Table. Molecular scoreRS moduleRSROREPBCIPM0.360.860.710.74EM-0.790.00-0.38-0.10HM-0.04-0.14-0.15-0.18IM0.260.380.340.32 The RS had a strong negative correlation with its EM (r= -0.79) and a weak positive correlation with its PM (r= 0.36) although the latter was stronger when the PM was thresholded; 78% of the cases had a PM score below the threshold of 6.5 and were assigned a value of 6.5 in the RS with no correlation between RS and PM in these samples (r=-0.03). ROR showed a very strong correlation with the PM (r=0.86), but none with the EM (r: 0.00). EP and BCI both showed strong correlation with the PM (r= 0.71 and 0.74, respectively) and with low or near absent correlation with EM (r= -0.38 and -0.10, respectively). There was little correlation between the HM with each of the scores while the IM correlation was similar for each score varying from 0.26 to 0.38. Of the two module components of BCI, MGI was strongly associated with the PM (r= 0.84) and not at all with the EM while H/I moderately correlated with PM (r=0.51) and weakly correlated with EM (r= -0.31). Conclusion: EP scores are moderately correlated with each of the other 3 scores while RS scores are dissimilar to those from the ROR and BCI. In contrast to common thinking the RS is driven only weakly by proliferative features and more by those related to ER/PR pathways. The EP, BCI and particularly ROR are dominated by proliferative features. These relationships provide and explanation for the differences that we and others have reported in the prognostic performance of the tests for both early and late recurrence. Citation Format: Richard Buus, Ivana Sestak, Mitch Dowsett, Ralf Kronenwett, Sean Ferree, Catherine Schnabel, Frederick L Baehner, Jack Cuzick. Correlation between and molecular drivers of oncotype DX, prosigna, EndoPredict and breast cancer index: A TransATAC study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-05.

Young-Onset Colon Cancer and Recurrence Risk by Gene Expression.

The incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer in younger adults (younger than 55 years) is increasing. We reviewed the complete database of a gene-expression test, Oncotype DX Colon Recurrence Score test, to determine age-related differences in recurrence score (RS) and single-gene results (7 cancer-related of the 12-gene assay). We included 20 478 stage II and III A and B colon cancer patients submitted to Genomic Health. RS results were grouped by low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Single-gene scores were described using median and interquartile range. Of all patients 72.5% and 72.6% of those younger than 40 years had low-risk RS. Comparing older with younger patients, RS or single-gene expression did not differ by age group or stage. Young-onset colon cancer does not differ by expression of the RS component genes. Most patients with stage II and III colon cancer have low-risk disease as measured by the 12-gene assay, regardless of age.

Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score.

Background: Clinical-pathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) influence adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decision for early breast cancer patients. We investigated the decision-making of ACT in patients with discordant risk classifications of clinical-pathological factors and RS.Methods: Patients with hormonal receptor (HR)+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, early breast cancer, who underwent 21-gene RS testing were identified from Ruijin Hospital (RJBC) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. According to Adjuvant! Online and RS (≤25 or >25), discordant risk classifications were defined as: clinical low-risk/ RS high-risk (C-low/ RS-high) and clinical high-risk/ RS low-risk (C-high/RS-low). McNemar's test was used to assess the changes between pre- and post-RS recommendations. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods.Results: Among 727 RJBC patients, the C-low/RS-high group and the C-high/RS-low group represented 19.7% and 21.3% of the cohort. After receiving 21-gene RS results, treatment recommendations were changed for 22.1% patients with discordant risk classifications: ACT rate increased from 41.9% to 75.5% in the C-low/RS-high group and decreased from 63.9% to 60.0% in the C-high/RS-low group. Among 2958 patients from the SEER cohort, 18.4% of the C-high/RS-low group and 59.2% of the C-low/RS-high group received ACT. There was no significant difference in the estimated 3-year BCSS between ACT or not among the C-low/RS-high group (p=0.708) and the C-high/RS-low groups (p=0.391).Conclusion: For patients with discordant risk classifications, physicians were apt to adopt the 21-gene RS rather than routine clinical-pathological factors to guide ACT selection.

Should women with early breast cancer under 40 years of age have a routine 21-gene recurrence score testing: A SEER database study

PurposeTo investigate the effect of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on chemotherapy-decision making and prognosis in breast cancer patients aged <40 years. MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we included patients aged <40 years with tumor size ≤5 cm, node negative, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2004 and 2015. Correlations among the 21-gene RS, chemotherapy decision-making and prognosis were analyzed. ResultsWe included 2721 patients in this study. According to TAILORx cutoffs, 352 (12.9%), 1814 (66.7%), and 555 (20.4%) patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts, respectively. The 21-gene RS categories were associated with the probability of receiving chemotherapy, with 7.1%, 33.4%, and 77.1% of patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts treated with chemotherapy, respectively (P < 0.001). Those in the intermediate-risk cohort were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy over time (P = 0.008), and the trends of chemotherapy receipt were stable in the low-risk and high-risk cohorts over time. Multivariate analysis showed that the 21-gene RS was an independent prognostic indicator for breast cancer specific survival. In the stratified analysis, the receipt of chemotherapy was associated with better breast cancer specific survival in the high-risk cohort (P = 0.028), but not in the intermediate-risk cohort (P = 0.223). Conclusions21-gene RS has clinical implications for young breast cancer patients with respect to optimizing chemotherapy-decisions. Despite increasing rates of chemotherapy receipt in young patients, more studies are needed to determine the definitive effect of chemotherapy in young patients with three RS categories.

Prognostic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Among Young Women With Node-Negative and Node-Positive ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSEThe 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is prognostic among women with early-stage estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) breast cancer and is used to inform recommendations for chemotherapy. Women ≤ 40 years of age represent a minority of patients studied using gene expression profiles.METHODSThe Young Women's Breast Cancer Study is a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years and enrolled patients between 2006 and 2016 (N = 1,302). We identified patients with stage I-III ER+/HER2− breast cancer. The RS assay was performed on banked specimens for patients who had not been tested clinically. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was assessed by TAILORx and traditional RS risk groups among patients with axillary node–negative (N0) and limited node–positive (N1) breast cancer.RESULTSAmong eligible women (N = 577), 189 (33%) had undergone RS testing, and 320 (56%) had banked specimens sufficient for testing. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. Median age at diagnosis was 37.2 years; 300 of 509 patients (59%) had N0 breast cancer, of whom 195 (65%) had an RS of 11-25 and fewer than half (86 of 195; 44%) received chemotherapy. Six-year DRFS rates were 94.4% and 92.3% (RS < 11), 96.9% and 85.2% (RS 11-25), and 85.1% and 71.3% (RS ≥ 26) among women with N0 and N1 disease, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe RS assay is prognostic among young women with node-negative and limited node-positive breast cancer, representing a valuable tool for risk stratification. Disease outcomes with a median follow-up of 6 years among young women with N0 disease and an RS of 0-25, a minority of whom received chemotherapy, and node-positive disease with an RS < 11 were very good, whereas those with N0 disease and an RS ≥ 26 or N1 disease with an RS ≥ 11 experienced substantial risk of early distant recurrence.

Ten-year clinical outcomes in N0 ER+ breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score-guided therapy

The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a validated prognosticator/predictor of chemotherapy (CT) benefit in early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC). Long-term data from real-life clinical practice where treatment was guided by the RS result are lacking. We performed exploratory analysis of the Clalit Health Services (CHS) registry, which included all CHS patients with node-negative ER+ HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 1/2006 and 12/2009 to determine 10-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence/BC-specific mortality (BCSM) in this cohort. The analysis included 1365 patients. Distribution of RS results: RS 0–10, 17.8%; RS 11–25, 62.5%; RS 26–100, 19.7%. Corresponding CT use: 0, 9.4, and 69.9%. Ten-year distant recurrence rates in patients with RS 0–10, 11–25, and 26–100: 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–6.2%), 6.1% (95% CI, 4.4–8.6%), and 13.1% (95% CI, 9.4–18.3%), respectively (P < 0.001); corresponding BCSM rates: 0.7% (95% CI 0.1–5.1%), 2.2% (95% CI, 1.3–3.7%), and 9.5% (95% CI, 6.0–14.9%) (P < 0.001). When the analysis included patients treated with endocrine therapy alone (95.5/87.5% of patients with RS 0–10/11–25), 10-year distant recurrence and BCSM rates for RS 0–10 patients were 2.7% (95% CI, 1.1–6.5%) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1–5.3%), respectively, and for RS 11–25 patients, 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9–8.3%) and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1–3.7%), respectively. For RS 11–25 patients, no statistically significant differences were observed in 10-year distant recurrence/BCSM rates between CT-treated and untreated patients; however, this should be interpreted cautiously since the number of events was low and patients were not randomized. In conclusion, in node-negative ER+ HER2-negative BC patients, where treatment decisions in real-life clinical practice incorporated the RS, patients with RS 0–25 (~80% of patients, <10% CT use) had excellent outcomes at 10 years. Patients with RS 26–100 had high distant recurrence risk despite CT use and are candidates for new treatment approaches.

Impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in older patients with breast cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay in adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making among older patients with early breast cancer. MethodsConsecutive hormonal receptor-positive, aged ≥60 patients with breast cancer were enrolled from Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2014 and December 2017. Treatment decisions were made by multi-disciplinary team (MDT) before and after 21-gene RS testing, and the actual treatment for each patient was also analyzed. ResultsA total of 511 patients were enrolled, with 331 (64.8%) aged between 60 and 69, 140 (27.4%) between 70 and 79, and 40 (7.8%) over 80 years. There were 138 (27.0%), 287 (56.2%), and 86 (16.8%) patients classified as low, intermediate, and high risk RS, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, tumor stage, nodal status, PR expression, Ki-67, and 21-gene RS were independent impact factors for chemotherapy recommendations (P < .05). Patients with high risk RS and intermediate risk RS (both P < .001) were more often recommended to receive chemotherapy than patients with low risk RS. Treatment recommendations changed in 74 (14.5%) patients after 21-gene RS testing: 17 (3.3%) from chemotherapy to no chemotherapy and 57 (11.2%) from no chemotherapy to chemotherapy. Overall compliance rate to MDT recommendation after 21-gene RS testing was 95.7%. ConclusionAn intermediate and/or high risk 21-gene RS assay was independently associated with receiving adjuvant chemotherapy among older patients with breast cancer. However, it showed a limited impact on adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making. After 21-gene RS testing, compliance with MDT recommendation was relatively high in older patients with breast cancer.

209P - Influence of age on the indication of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer using Oncotype DX. An analysis of 240 patients treated in the Institut Catala d’Oncologia (ICO) hospitals

BackgroundBenefit derived from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is doubtful in a high percentage of patients (pt) with hormone-receptor–positive HER2 negative early breast cancer. The 21-gene recurrence-score (RS) assay Oncotype DX, provide prognostic and predictive information. Results of the TAYLORx study have confirmed that most of patients with negative node status and RS>25 can avoid CT without increasing their risk of relapse. However, pt<50 years (y) and RS>20 showed benefit with CT. MethodsAim: To analyse the impact of age using RS test to change the indication of adjuvant CT and the relationship between different clinical pathological factors and the RS value. We analysed 240 cases out of 251 RS test performed in the 3 ICO Centers during 2017-2018. We compared the adjuvant treatment initially planned according to institutional protocol with the treatment given after RS in the total cohort and in pt<50 y. We performed a logistical regression analysis of pathological factors and RS. ResultsCT was indicated in all pt before knowing the RS results. Only 46pt (19%) received CT after RS results. 14 out of 88pt < 50 y received adjuvant CT (15%). 15pt <50 y had a RS between 21-25, only 5 of them received CT, because in most of them, the RS was performed prior TAILORx results were published. Nowadays, all of these 15pt would had received CT: 61/240 (25%). Clinical-pathological characteristics of the series are summarized in the Table. Of the risk factors analysed, only Ki67>25 (<0.001) and PR≤20% (0.01) showed a statistically significant relationship with a higher probability of RS>25 in a multivariate analysis.Table209PTableAge median (range)53 (19-76) <50 y 35.1% ≥50 y 64.9%Tumor size median15mmHistological gradeG1 23% G2 69.7% G3 4.4%Progesterone receptor≤20% 21% >20% 78%Ki67 median (p25-75)20 (13,28) ≤14 27% 14-25 41% >25% 31%Nodal statuspN0 57%pN1mic 15%pN1a 27% Conclusions82% of pt of our series could avoid CT, however this proportion change after TAYLORx results in younger patients. Today 75% of these pt would had avoided CT. Ki67 > 25% and Progesterone Receptor ≤20% were the only pathological factors associated with an increased risk of RS>25. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

21-Gene Recurrence Score Adds Significant Value for Grade 3 Breast Cancers: Results From a National Cohort.

The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) is used to identify patients with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer who may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. We hypothesized that many women with poor prognostic histopathologic grade 3 disease may be offered chemotherapy irrespective of RS results, of whom a subset may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 30,864 women in the National Cancer Database were diagnosed with pT1c to pT2, pN0 to pN1, grade 3 estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast carcinoma from 2010 to 2015. RS was stratified as low (less than 18), intermediate (18 to 30), and high (31 or more). Overall survival by RS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and multivariable proportional hazards, with adjustment for relevant clinical and demographic variables. RS testing in grade 3 cancers increased between 2010 and 2015 (pN0, 53% to 72%; pN1, 16% to 36%). Among the 13,558 women with pN0 and the 2,840 with pN1 disease with RS testing, 27.1% and 30.0%, respectively, had low scores (less than 18). The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with a high RS, but not low RS, was significantly higher with chemotherapy (v no chemotherapy; absolute differences: high RS pN0 = 12.2% and pN1 = 25.5%, both P < .001; low RS pN0 = 2.5%, P = .07; and pN1 = 1.0%, P = .27), findings that were reinforced in multivariable analyses risk adjusted by clinicopathologic characteristics. Increased use of RS may help to better tailor treatment recommendations by stratifying patients with grade 3 disease into those who will and will not derive survival benefit and should be considered in all patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative T1c to T2, N0 to N1 disease.

Progesterone Receptor Status and Tumor Grade Predict the 21-Gene Recurrence Score of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer

Aim: To assess the association between established clinicopathological variables and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) stratification of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. Materials & methods: We identified 9030 ILC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Results: Older age, higher grade tumor and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative disease were independent predictors of high-risk RS stratification. Among patients with PR-positive tumors, 3, 6 and 15% with well-differentiated (G1), moderately-differentiated (G2) and poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3) disease were in the high-risk cohort, respectively. In patients with PR-negative tumors: 16, 24 and 41% of patients with G1, G2 and G3 disease were in the high-risk cohort, respectively. Conclusion: The 21-gene RS testing may not be necessary for patients with PR+/G1-2 ILC.

Impact of 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decision for Patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Results of the Prospective Multicenter ROXANE Study.

The ROXANE Italian prospective study evaluated the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) results on adjuvant treatment decision for patients with early breast cancer. Nine centers participated. Physicians used the RS test whenever unsure about adjuvant treatment recommendation for patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative, T1-T3, N0-N1 early breast cancer. Pre-RS and post-RS treatment recommendations were collected. A total of 251 patients were included. N0 patients (61%) showed higher grade (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p = .001) and were more frequently progesterone receptor negative (p = .012) as compared with N1 patients. RS results were as follows: <11, n = 63 (25.1%); 11-25, n = 143 (57%); and ≥26, n = 45 (17.9%). Higher RS was found in N0 vs. N1 patients (p = .001) and in cases of G3 (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p < .001). The rate of change in treatment decision was 30% (n = 75), mostly from chemotherapy (CT) plus hormone therapy (CT + HT) to hormone therapy (HT; 76%, n = 57/75). The proportion of patients recommended to CT + HT was significantly reduced from pre-RS to post-RS (52% to 36%, p < .0001). CT use reduction was more evident for N1 patients (55% to 27%) than for N0 patients (50% to 42%) and was observed only in cases of RS ≤17. Physicians predominantly used the 21-gene assay in N0 patients with a more aggressive biology or in N1 patients showing more indolent biology. In this selected patient population, the use of RS testing led to a 30% rate of change in treatment decision. In the N1 patient subgroup, the use of RS testing contributed to reduce CT use by more than half. This study shows that, even in a context in which physicians recommend a high proportion of patients to endocrine treatment alone before knowing the results of the Recurrence Score (RS) assay, the use of the RS test, whenever uncertainty regarding adjuvant treatment recommendation is present, significantly contributes in further reducing the use of chemotherapy, especially for N1 patients.

Oncotype DX testing in early-stage node-positive breast cancer and impact on chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center.

549 Background: The 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is widely used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negtive (HER2-), lymph node negative (LN-) breast cancer. It’s adoption in lymph node positive (LN+) disease remains controversial. In 2016, we implemented ‘reflex’ RS testing for patients ≤65 years with HR+/HER2- breast cancer including T1/T2 N1 (grade 1 or 2) tumors. Providers can also order Oncotype DX outside of reflex criteria. We sought to assess RS distribution and factors associated with chemotherapy use in HR+/HER2-/LN+ breast cancer patients at our center. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic HR+/HER2-/LN+ breast cancer who underwent primary surgery at our center were identified from our prospective database. We examined the distribution of low (RS &lt; 18), intermediate (RS 18-30) and high (RS &gt; 30) RS and identified characteristics for those who did not meet reflex criteria. A multinomial logistic regression model was performed to identify factors associated with chemotherapy receipt among all LN+ patients. Results: From 1/2016-3/2018, we identified 296 consecutive patients with HR+/HER2-/LN+ breast cancer. 200 (68%) patients had RS testing and 128 (64%) met reflex criteria. Reasons for not meeting RS reflex criteria included age &gt; 65 (n = 35), grade III disease (n = 35) and N2/N3 tumors (n = 10). Among the 200 patients with RS, 122 (61%) had RS &lt; 18, 67 (34%) had RS 18-30, and 11 (6%) had RS &gt; 30. Only 68/200 (34%) patients with RS received chemotherapy as compared to 54/96 (56%) patients without RS (p = 0.0004). Compared to patients without RS testing, the odds of receiving chemotherapy were less with RS &lt; 18 (OR = 0.46). The odds of receiving chemotherapy were greater with ≥3 positive LNs versus 1 positive LN (OR = 3.40). Conclusions: The majority of HR+/HER2-/LN+ patients undergoing upfront surgery at our center receive RS testing (200/296), with 122 (61%) resulting in low risk RS. Patients with low risk scores (RS &lt; 18) were less likely to receive chemotherapy. While nodal involvement remains a common driver of chemotherapy use, our study demonstrates that RS testing provides clinically useful information in this population.

Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in nonmetastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer using 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score test.

e12093 Background: The Recurrence Score (RS) result based on the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay is standard of care in deciding adjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy versus hormone therapy alone in hormone-receptor positive (HR+), HER 2 negative, node–negative breast cancer. This study explores the role of RS result in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: In this retrospective single institution cohort study, electronic medical records of 148 women with HR+, HER 2 negative, non-metastatic breast cancer who received NACT from 2006 onward were screened. 38 patients were excluded due to lack of tissue for testing. Pretreatment biopsy blocks were sent to Genomic Health, Inc. for Oncotype Dx testing. Low RS result was defined as ≤25. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual tumor. Partial response (PR) was residual tumor with &gt; 25% decrease in the largest dimension. No response (NR) was defined as &lt; 25% decrease in the tumor post NACT. Progression (PD) was defined as increase in size of original tumor or new site(s) of disease. Results: Of the 110 patients studied, 58% were postmenopausal women. Fifty percent were African American, 12% were Caucasian and 27% were Hispanic. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant histology (86%). Most patients had &gt; T2 disease (97%) with 73% being clinically node positive. Adriamycin based NACT regimen was used in treating 86.3% of the women. Forty patients (36.4%) had tumor with RS≤25. NR/PD was significantly higher in tumors with RS≤25 (27/40) vs RS &gt; 25 (13/70) (OR: 9.1, 95% CI: 3.7-22.2, P&lt; 0.001). pCR was seen in 16% with RS &gt; 25 and 0% with RS ≤25. Response to NACT (pCR/PR) was 32.5% in RS≤25 vs 81.4% in RS &gt; 25. In tumors with response, RS &gt; 25 was associated with a greater percent decrease in the tumor size compared to RS≤25 (median decrease of 71% vs 52%, P= 0.033). Conclusions: HR+, HER 2 negative, RS≤25 breast cancer is associated with increased rates of NR/PD and is unlikely to respond to NACT. Recurrence Score result determination in pretreatment breast cancer biopsy samples can be an effective tool to select patients with non-metastatic breast cancer for NACT. Studies are needed to determine novel neoadjuvant therapeutic approaches in patients who are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy but are unlikely to benefit from NACT.

Clinical analysis of 21-gene recurrence score test in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.

The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) predicts the prognosis of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early-stage breast cancer and the effectiveness of adding adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of endocrine therapy to avoid excessive chemotherapy. The present study aimed to analyze clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapeutic efficacy-related target genes with the 21-gene RS in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer in China. The prognostic value of chemotherapeutic efficacy-related target genes was also examined. In addition, this study investigated the postoperative adjuvant therapeutic decision-oriented role of 21-gene RS in hormone receptor-positive and lymph node-negative early-stage breast cancer. In the present retrospective study, 110 ER+/HER2− early-stage breast cancer patients were tested with the 21-gene RS. The analyses of clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapeutic efficacy-related target genes with the 21-gene RS were performed using the χ2 test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and binary logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were drawn in www.kmplot.com. Furthermore, the McNemar χ2 test was used to compare the changes of treatment decisions before and after the 21-gene test. The median RS of 110 patients was 16 (range, 2–47), and patients were categorized as low (59.1%), intermediate (34.5%) or high risk (6.4%). The results revealed that higher body mass index, invasive ductal carcinoma type, higher histological grade, luminal B molecular type and higher thymidylate synthetase (TYMS) and DNA topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) gene expression levels were more likely to have a higher RS. Kaplan-Meier plots suggested that expression of TYMS, tubulin β3 class III (TUBB3) and TOP2A genes was significantly associated with relapse-free survival for ER+ breast cancer. Additionally, prior to 21-gene RS testing, 61 patients (55%) were recommended adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy; however, following 21-gene test, 32 patients (29%) were treated with only adjuvant endocrine therapy. TYMS, TUBB3 and TOP2A gene expression may have prognostic value for ER+ breast cancer. In addition, 21-gene RS testing may aid to avoid excessive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy Costs and 21-Gene Recurrence Score Genomic Testing Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2005 to 2011.

This study examined whether associations between 21-gene recurrence score (RS) genomic testing and lower costs among patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are observable in real-world data from the Medicare population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using SEER-Medicare data for a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed from 2005 through 2011. The main outcomes were associations between RS testing and overall and chemotherapy-specific costs. The primary analysis was restricted to patients aged 66 to 75 years. The primary analysis comprised 30,058 patients. Mean costs 1 year after diagnosis were $35,940 [SD, $28,894] overall, $51,127 [33,386] for clinically high-risk disease, $33,225 [$27,711] for intermediate-risk disease, and $26,695 [$19,532] for low-risk disease. Chemotherapy-specific costs followed similar trends. In multivariable analyses, RS testing was associated with significantly lower costs among high-risk patients in terms of both relative costs (cost ratio, 0.88; 99% CI, 0.82-0.94) and absolute costs ($6,606; 99% CI, $39,223-$9,290). Higher costs among low-risk and intermediate-risk patients were mainly caused by higher noncancer costs. In sensitivity analyses that included all patients aged ≥66 years (N=64,996), associations between RS testing and costs among high-risk patients were similar but less pronounced because of lower overall use of chemotherapy. RS testing was associated with lower overall and chemotherapy-related costs in patients with high-risk disease, consistent with lower chemotherapy use among these patients. Higher overall costs for patients with intermediate-risk and low-risk disease were driven largely by non-treatment-related costs.

Abstract P3-08-09: The 21-gene recurrence score and chemotherapy use in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive breast cancer: A National Cancer Database study

Abstract Background The 21-gene (Oncotype DX) Recurrence Score (RS) is a multi-gene expression assay that is both prognostic and predictive of adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) benefit in estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2 negative breast cancer (BC). Use of the RS in TNBC and HER2+ BC is not recommended by national guidelines. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to evaluate whether oncologists use the RS in these subtypes. Additionally, we assessed the prognostic effects of the RS in node negative patients (pts) who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Pts with TN and HER2+ BC diagnosed from 2010-2015 in the NCDB were analyzed. Pts with neoadjuvant therapy or stage IV were excluded. Cases with RS testing were classified as low (RS 0-17), intermediate (RS 18-30) or high (RS 31+). Analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression; overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results 142,330 pts were evaluable: 64,830 TNBC and 77,500 HER2+ (21,768 ER-/HER2+ and 55,732 ER+/HER2+). In these subtypes, RS was performed in 5,369 (3.8%) pts as follows: 1,479 (2.3%) TNBC, 185 (0.8%) ER-/HER2+, and 3,705 (6.6%) ER+/HER2+. Given the small ER-/HER2+ cohort, we focused on TNBC and ER+/HER2+. Within these subtypes, factors associated with RS testing included lower grade, smaller pathologic tumor size, pathologic N0 status, white race, age 60-69, and ILC or IMC histology (each p&amp;lt;0.005). Of the TNBC pts tested, the RS distribution was: low 16.3%, intermediate 13.1% and high 70.6%, while for ER+/HER2+ it was low 30.5%, intermediate 30.7% and high 38.8% (p&amp;lt;0.001). AdjCT was less frequently recommended in pts with low RS; however, this varied by tumor subtype with AdjCT recommended for 66.8% of TNBC with low RS and 37.9% of ER+/HER2+ with low RS. For intermediate RS, rates of AdjCT recommendation were 74.3% and 73.7%, and for high RS were 94.0% and 93.2% for TNBC and ER+/HER2+ respectively. In a multivariable analysis among pts with low RS, factors associated with AdjCT recommendation included younger age, larger pathologic tumor size, node positive disease, and higher grade. In AdjCT untreated TNBC, 5 yr OS did not differ for low RS (96.5%) vs intermediate RS (95.2%, p=0.82). In contrast OS was significantly worse for high RS (76.7%) than the other two groups, each p≤0.04. In AdjCT untreated ER+/HER2+, 5 yr OS was significantly better for low RS (96.7%) vs intermediate RS (92.5%, p=0.03) and vs high RS (92.1%, p=0.003), with no difference between intermediate RS vs high RS (p=0.32). Evaluating pts who did receive AdjCT, there was no significant difference in 5 yr OS for either subtype according to RS (p=0.46 and p=0.83). Interestingly, in patients with low RS, 5 yr OS was similar with or without AdjCT in both TNBC (89.5% vs 96.5%, p=0.25) and ER+/HER2+ (97.6% vs 96.7%, p=0.47). Conclusions RS testing is being conducted in a small fraction of pts with TN and HER2+ BC with lower clinical risk features. The observation that RS is prognostic for survival in AdjCT untreated patients is hypothesis generating, and suggests that further evaluation of the RS and other multigene assays in ER negative and HER2+ BC is warranted. Citation Format: Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Cocco D, Day CN, Leon-Ferre R, Habermann EB, Goetz MP. The 21-gene recurrence score and chemotherapy use in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive breast cancer: A National Cancer Database study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-09.

Abstract P5-15-09: Impact of oncotype dx genetic signature used in early breast cancer. Clinical and economic analisys of a 110 patient cohort treated in the Catalan Oncologic Institute (ICO), Spain

Abstract Introduction Benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is doubtful in a high percentage of patients with early breast cancer. The 21-gene recurrence-score (RS) assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health) is one gene-expression assay that provide prognostic and predictive information in hormone-receptor (RH) positive breast cancer. The results of the TAILORx study have confirmed that the majority of patients with tumors RH + and HER2 negative can avoid CT without increasing their risk of relapse. From 2012 to 2015 we used Mammaprint (MMP), in our institution and 60% of cases could avoided CT (communicated in SABCS 2015). Since 2017 we use RS for this purpose. Primary Objective To analyze the impact of using RS to change the indication of adjuvant CT. Secondary Objectives To analyze the association between different clinical pathological factors and the RS value, and calculate the difference between the cost of all RS test and the cost in direct expense of the treatment with CT of all patients who could avoid it thanks to the RS Material and methods We analyzed all RS test performed in the three ICO centers during 2017. We sent 112 tumor samples; in 2 samples adequated RNA for RS was not obtained. We compared the adjuvant treatment initially planned according to institutional treatment protocol with the treatment given after RS. We compared the direct economic costs of CT with the costs of the diagnostic test, and performed a logistic regression analysis of some pathological factors and RS value. Results The RS could be determined in 110 of 112 cases, in which there was indication of adjuvant CT. Only 14 patients received CT (12,72%) with the RS value, so CT was avoided in 96 patients (87,28%). The clinical-pathological characteristics of the series are summarized in the table 1. Of the risk factors analyzed, only grade 3 (p 0.001) and PR &amp;lt;20% (p&amp;lt;0.002) showed a statistically significant relationship with a higher probability of RS&amp;gt; 25. No association was found between age, nodal status, tumor diameter, Ki67, Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma vs neither Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma nor Lympho-Vascular invasion. The cost of the genetic studies was 180000€ (1636€ each). The cost of each CT schedule (EC x 4 followed by paclitaxel x 12) was 7214€ and the total cost of 96 cases 692590€. Direct costs savings estimated from the reduction in CT treatment were 512590€ Conclusion: Our series shows that RS avoided unnecessary CT in 87% of cases and was more cost-effective than a previous series with MMP. G3 and RP &amp;lt;20 were the only pathological factors associated with an increased risk of RS&amp;gt; 25. Table 1.Patients characteristics and clinical-pathological details from the analyzed tumorsPatient characteristicsAge, mean (range)53,76 (19 – 75)≥50y72 (65.5%)&amp;lt;50y38 (34.5%)HistologyInfiltrating ductal carcinoma88 (80%)Infiltrating lobular carcinoma20 (18,2%)Others2 (1,8%)TNMTumor diameter (mm), mean (range)19,25 (1 – 160)pN058 (52,7%)pN1mic21 (19%)pN131 (28,3%)Hormone receptorsRE 2-100%110 (100%)RP &amp;lt;20%22 (20%)RP ≥20%88 (80%)Ki67 median, mean (range)20, 21 (2-75)Lymphovascular invasionyes9 (8%)no101 (92%)Adjuvant treatmentCT14 (12,72%)Hormonotherapy96 (87,28%) Citation Format: Ferrer M, Dorcas J, Quiroga V, Margelí M, del Barco S, Stradella A, Petit A, Falo C, Viñas G, Romeo M, Villanueva R, Cirauqui B, Vázquez S, Fernández A, Recalde S, Vethencourt A, Soler T, Pérez-Martín X, Gil-Gil M. Impact of oncotype dx genetic signature used in early breast cancer. Clinical and economic analisys of a 110 patient cohort treated in the Catalan Oncologic Institute (ICO), Spain [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-09.

Abstract P2-08-07: Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay among young women with node-negative and node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer

Abstract Background: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is prognostic among women with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer (BC) and is used to select patients for chemotherapy (CT). Young women (age &amp;lt;40) have represented a minority in studies evaluating gene expression assays, including TAILORx, and additional data in young women are needed. Methods: In the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with BC at age &amp;lt;40 enrolling between 2006-2016 (N=1302), we identified those with stage I-III ER+/HER2- BC. Disease and treatment information were obtained through serial surveys and medical record review. The RS was performed on banked specimens for those not tested clinically. Distant recurrence free interval (DRFI), defined as distant recurrence or BC specific death, by risk group was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Outcomes by receipt of CT were explored in the RS 11-25 group, and due to small number of events, reported descriptively. Results: Among eligible women (N=577), 189 (33%) had undergone RS testing and 320 (56%) had banked specimens sufficient for testing. Median follow-up was 6 years. Median age at diagnosis was 37, most had N0 BC (300/509, 59%), and the majority had RS 11-25 (306/509, 60%). RS result was significantly associated with DRFI in N0 BC, with hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) of 0.29 (0.07,1.30) and 0.21 (0.09,0.50) for RS&amp;lt;11 and RS 11-25, respectively, relative to RS&amp;gt;26 (and trended towards significance in N1 BC). Results were similar using conventional RS groups. Among women with N0 BC and RS 11-25, 44% received CT, with two events in the 86 receiving CT (2.3%) and 6 events in the 109 without CT (5.5%); 5/8 (63%) occurred in those with RS 20-25. Table 1 N0N1Total Cohort N%N%N% 3005916332509100Median Age37.137.537.2Tumor Stage T120869694229358T28227784817635T3103159357T4001151Grade I4716855711II16555794926652III8829754618536Not assessed 1 1 PR status by IHC Negative (&amp;lt;1%)2071710398Positive (&amp;gt;=1%)280931469047092Chemotherapy No1414712715430Yes159531519335570Ovarian Suppression No263881499145289Yes37121495711TAILORx RS Groups RS &amp;lt;1133111495411RS 11-2519565885430660RS &amp;gt;=267224613714929Conventional RS Groups RS &amp;lt;1812742543319939RS 18-3012542694221142RS &amp;gt;=31481640259919 Table 2 6-year freedom from distant recurrence or breast cancer deathDRFI HR (95% CI) N0N1N0N1TAILORx RS Groups RS &amp;lt;1194.4%92.3%0.29 (0.07,1.30)0.21 (0.03,1.61)RS 11-2596.9%85.2%0.21 (0.09, 0.50)0.55 (0.27,1.12)RS &amp;gt;=2685.1%71.3%RefRefConventional RS Groups RS &amp;lt;1897.5%85.9%0.19 (0.06,0.59)0.31 (0.13,0.74)RS 18-3093.1%87.3%0.39 (0.16,1.00)0.32 (0.14,0.73)RS &amp;gt;=3186.4%62.8%RefRef Conclusions: The RS is prognostic among young women with node-negative and node-positive BC, and is a valuable tool for risk stratification. Disease outcomes among young women with N0 disease and RS 11-25, a minority of whom received CT, are very good. Evaluation of the effect of ovarian suppression/CT-induced amenorrhea by RS/treatment strata is ongoing. Citation Format: Poorvu PD, Gelber SI, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Collins LC, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Jakubowski DM, Russell C, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Prognostic impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay among young women with node-negative and node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-07.

Results of PONDx, a prospective multicenter study of the Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay: Real-life utilization and decision impact in French clinical practice

Adjuvant chemotherapy shows clear benefits in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Its benefits are less universal in BCs expressing hormone receptors. The 21-gene Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score test was designed for HR+, HER2– early-stage BC before decision on adjuvant chemotherapy. Its validity and utility was demonstrated prospectively across multiple studies.The observational study PONDx characterized the use of Oncotype DX® Breast in routine practice in France and evaluated its decision impact. Of 882 ER-positive BC patients (67% postmenopausal), most (79%) had N0/Nmic node involvement, grade 2 tumors (68%), tumor size 1–5 cm (88%), and ductal histology (78%). BCs with histopathologically elevated recurrence risk included grade 3: 18%; N1: 21%; Ki67 > 20%: 31%.Recurrence Score results by prognostic category were: <18: 54%, 18–30: 36%; >30: 10%. Compared to recommendations before individual availability of the score, results prompted net absolute reductions in chemotherapy recommendations of 36% (total population), and 29% (grade 3 and/or Ki67 > 20% histologies). Decisions reflected prognostic implications: in the Recurrence Score <18 category, 95% of patients received recommendations of hormonal therapy only, in the >30 category, 97.5% were recommended additional chemotherapy; 95% followed the final recommendations of their physicians.The Recurrence Score provides independent predictive and prognostic information in ER + N0/N1 early BC, including high-risk subgroups. PONDx further characterizes the population where the test is beneficial in real-life use and fits current clinical needs.Oncotype DX® Breast enables relevant net reductions in chemotherapy use, sparing patients from serious toxicities. Its therapeutic implications are highly accepted by physicians and patients.

21-Gene Recurrence Score Testing in HER2-positive Patients

IntroductionThe 21-gene recurrence score (RS) has been extensively studied and validated in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer; however, RS testing is not routinely performed in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) disease. We sought to determine patterns of RS testing, to characterize RS distributions, and to determine the impact of RS results on clinical decision-making for patients with ER+, HER2+ breast cancer. Materials and MethodsUsing the Surveillance and Epidemiology End Results program database, we identified women with ER+, HER2+ breast cancer. We stratified patients using TAILORx RS cutoffs and evaluated treatment characteristics across patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with RS testing and receipt of a high-risk RS. ResultsOverall, 5% of patients with ER+, HER2+, early stage breast cancer underwent RS testing. The distribution of RS testing by TAILORx cutoffs were: high-risk, 17%; intermediate-risk, 49%; and low-risk, 34%. Chemotherapy utilization among those not tested was 66%. Among those tested, utilization was significantly associated with RS results: 67% of high-risk, 30% of intermediate-risk, and 19% of low-risk patients received chemotherapy. Progesterone receptor-negative status, larger tumor size, and high tumor grade were significantly associated with high-risk RS. ConclusionsRS testing is used sparingly among patients with HER2+ early-stage breast cancer; however, test results appear to impact clinician’s decision-making on chemotherapy use.