INTRODUCTION Body contouring procedures are performed to treat excess skin following weight loss and have been associated with increased quality of life and improved body image.1 Mastopexy is indicated to treat breast ptosis and remains one of the most commonly performed plastic surgery operations in the United States.2 A number of skin excision patterns including the circumareolar, vertical, L-shaped, short-scar periareolar, and Wise-pattern have been described, with technique selection dependent on the degree of breast ptosis and amount and location of skin excess.3 Similar to a reduction mammoplasty, the nipple-areolar complex may be based on either a superomedial, medial, superior, inferior, lateral, or central pedicle.3 To treat abdominal skin excess, interventions ranging from a conservative excision of skin and fat to a traditional or fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty with fascial plication and umbilical transposition may be utilized depending on the degree and location of excess skin and fat as well as the presence of rectus diastasis.4 Finally, liposuction may be utilized with excisional treatment of abdominal skin excess to add improved contouring.5 Here, we present the case of a young woman who desired treatment of breast ptosis and excess abdominal skin and fat following weight loss. CASE REPORT A 19-year-old woman presented following approximately 50 pounds of weight loss with diet and exercise. She had been weight stable for over 1 year. She was noted to have bilateral grade II breast ptosis and a moderate amount of excess infraumbilical skin and fat with no hernias or rectus diastasis. She was deemed to be an excellent candidate for bilateral wise-pattern mastopexy with a superomedial pedicle and an excision of excess infraumbilical skin and fat, with additional liposuction of her axilla, abdomen, and flanks. Consent for the use of video and photograph images was obtained from the patient. Markings The patient was marked in a standing position (Video). (See Video [online], which demonstrates operative technique for bilateral mastopexy, abdominal skin and fat resection, and liposuction.) The sternal notch to nipple distance was 22 cm. The inferior border of the areola to inframammary fold (IMF) distance was 6 cm, and the width of the pedicle at its base was 8 cm. {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 1.","caption":"The video demonstrates operative technique for bilateral mastopexy, abdominal skin and fat resection, and liposuction.","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_am59bf2h"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} Surgical Technique The details of the operation are shown in the Video. Tumescent solution (1 L in total) was infiltrated before completion of the mastopexy, followed by liposuction, and finally, by abdominal skin and fat resection. DISCUSSION A Wise-pattern skin excision was chosen for the mastopexy, given the significant amount of vertical excess skin as well as ptosis. A more conservative skin resection pattern (eg, vertical) may have obviated the need for an IMF scar. A limited abdominal skin excision rather than an abdominoplasty with umbilical transposition was chosen to minimize dissection and potential complications (ie, umbilical necrosis, seroma from extensive undermining, etc). An abdominoplasty with umbilical transposition may have allowed for improved final umbilical positioning. CONCLUSIONS The patient was noted to be healing well at her 3 week postoperative visit and was very satisfied with her aesthetic outcome. Mastopexy may be safely performed in combination with abdominal skin resection and liposuction for such patients, avoiding a traditional abdominoplasty in young populations.
Read full abstract