We would like to thank Brenner et al1Brenner D.J. Curtis R.E. Hall E.J. Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery.Cancer. 2000; 88: 398-406Google Scholar for their comments supporting the findings of our study. While we agree that a radiation dose is given to tissues outside of the high-dose radiation volumesduring radiation therapy for cancer, most studies have demonstrated that the major carcinogenic effect from radiation is within the high-dose region.1Brenner D.J. Curtis R.E. Hall E.J. Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery.Cancer. 2000; 88: 398-406Google Scholar, 2Kleinerman R.A. Boice Jr, J.D. Storm H.H. Sparen P. Andersen A. Pukkala E. Lynch C.F. Hankey B.F. Flannery J.T. Second primary cancer after treatment for cervical cancer. An international cancer registries study.Cancer. 1995; 76: 442-452Google Scholar We certainly agree that organs other than the rectum are exposed to a high does of radiation during radiation therapy for prostate cancer, particularly the bladder, and this must be considered for surveillance after prostate irradiation. The increased risk of lung cancer in patients who undergo irradiation for prostate cancer lung is an intriguing finding. Although the lung receives a radiation dose (combination of scatter and leakage) of approximately 60 cGy during prostate cancer treatment, this dose does not produce a major increase in cancer formation in most organs; other exposures, such as cigarette smoking, may act synergistically with irradiation to increase lung cancer incidence (as has been shown in radium miners).3Morrison H.I. Villeneuve P.J. Lubin J.H. Schaubel D.E. Radon-progeny exposure and lung cancer risk in a cohort of Newfoundland fluorspar miners.Radiat Res. 1998; 150: 58-65Google Scholar However, important risk factors for lung cancer, particularly cigarette smoking, may not be equally distributed between those treated with radiation therapy and those treated with surgery, and this may result in an apparent increased risk of lung cancer in the irradiated group due to confounding. Our study4Baxter N.N. Tepper J.E. Durham S.B. Rothenberger D.A. Virnig B.A. Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation a population-based study.Gastroenterology. 2005; 128: 819-824Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (166) Google Scholar and Brenner’s study1Brenner D.J. Curtis R.E. Hall E.J. Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery.Cancer. 2000; 88: 398-406Google Scholar employed cohort designs and therefore confounding due to selection bias is a concern and may account for apparent differences in rectal cancer rates between those who undergo surgery and those who undergo irradiation. For example, in our study, we found that patients undergoing irradiation were significantly older than those undergoing surgery. As increasing age is a known risk factor for rectal cancer, patients undergoing irradiation in both studies were at a higher baseline risk of rectal cancer than patients who had surgery only. Although we controlled for age in our analysis, we could not control for unmeasured confounders, and thus the potential for selection bias remained. By demonstrating a significant increase in cancer in the area in the high-dose region (the rectum) but no significant increase in areas outside the high-dose region (the remainder of the colon), we were able to conclude that irradiation has a direct effect on rectal carcinogenesis, and this effect cannot be explained by any baseline higher risk of colorectal cancer in those undergoing radiation therapy. Our consideration of the potential influence of selection bias represents a major improvement over the methods of previous research in this area1Brenner D.J. Curtis R.E. Hall E.J. Ron E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery.Cancer. 2000; 88: 398-406Google Scholar, 5Neugut A.I. Ahsan H. Robinson E. Ennis R.D. Bladder carcinoma and other second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma.Cancer. 1997; 79: 1600-1604Google Scholar, 6Pickles T. Phillips N. The risk of second malignancy in men with prostate cancer treated with or without radiation in British Columbia, 1984–2000.Radiother Oncol. 2002; 65: 145-151Google Scholar and greatly strengthens our conclusions. Prostate Radiotherapy Is Associated With Second Cancers in Many Organs, not Just the ColorectumGastroenterologyVol. 129Issue 2PreviewThe recent study by Baxter et al1 on rectal cancer associated with prostate cancer radiotherapy extended by several years the follow-up period from our earlier study,2 based on the same SEER cancer registry database. The more extended follow-up confirms our earlier conclusion that rectal cancer is significantly elevated in long-term survivors of prostate cancer radiotherapy, compared with a comparison group of prostate cancer patients who underwent surgery alone. Baxter et al1 report risks for radiation-associated rectal cancer that are very similar to our earlier estimates; specifically, they estimate a hazard ratio (radiotherapy vs. Full-Text PDF