Rectal Cancer Research Articles

Training program for radiologists for improving the multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer is a multidisciplinary task. The transition to a new edition of clinical guidelines for the treatment of colorectal cancer in 2024, while maintaining the routine approach to MR staging of malignant neoplasms of this localization, reduces the level of continuity between medical specialists. AIM: To improve the quality and completeness of MR diagnostics of malignant neoplasms of the rectum to ensure continuity and improve the multidisciplinary approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the completeness of compliance with the parameters of TNM8 (2017) and the MRI subclassification T3 of rectal cancer was carried out on 137MRI scans of the pelvic organs and protocols with conclusions to them. Based on the results of the analysis, educational training and a conclusion template for radiologists were developed and conducted, after which the MR images were re-evaluated. Before and after the training, the most fully evaluated MRI scans by radiologists were provided to medical experts to form a "second opinion". The results obtained made it possible to calculate the absolute and relative number of consensuses (coinciding in all parameters of the conclusions) and to identify cases of rectal cancer restaging that require changes in treatment tactics. RESULTS: Before the educational training, only 11% of MRI scans and their reports met the requirements of the modern protocol. After the training, 78% of the images were completed in compliance with all requirements. Particular difficulties and the majority of "discrepancies" in conclusions arose when determining the depth of tumor invasion into the mesorectal tissue; measuring the distance from the tumor and/or affected lymph node to the mesorectal fascia or edge of the levator ani muscle and identifying signs of extramural vascular invasion. It was not possible to achieve complete consensus in all cases on these parameters. CONCLUSION: The analysis of MRI scans of the pelvic organs, the development and implementation of educational training to improve the interpretation of medical images, made it possible to significantly improve the staging of rectal cancer and ensure proper continuity in the implementation of a multidisciplinary approach

Using a modified Delphi procedure to select a PRO-CTCAE-based subset for patient-reported symptomatic toxicity monitoring in rectal cancer patients.

Standardized patient-reported outcomes (PRO) monitoring during and after rectal cancer treatment provides insight into treatment-related toxicities patients experience and improves health-related quality-of-life as well as overall survival. We aimed to select a subset of the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for standardized monitoring of treatment-related symptomatic toxicities in rectal cancer. We used a mixed methods approach including a literature review, and semi-structured interviews with health care providers (HCPs) involved in rectal cancer care and rectal cancer patients. Results from literature and interviews were summarized and used in a modified Delphi procedure to select a PRO-CTCAE subset specific for rectal cancer. Twenty-six PRO-CTCAE symptomatic toxicities were identified from literature. Fifteen HCPs from multiple disciplines (medical, radiation and surgical oncology), and a heterogeneous group of fifteen rectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and/or surgery, participated in semi-structured interviews. Ten HCPs (67%) and nine patients (90%) participated in the first Delphi round. The final selected PRO-CTCAE core-subset contained 16 symptomatic toxicities: 'diarrhea', 'fecal incontinence', 'constipation','bloating of the abdomen', 'pain in the abdomen', 'vomiting', 'decreased libido', 'pain during vaginal sex', 'ability to achieve and maintain erection', 'fatigue', 'anxiety', 'feeling that nothing could cheer you up', 'urinary incontinence', 'painful urination', 'general pain', and 'hand-foot syndrome'. Based on a comprehensive mixed methods study, a PRO-CTCAE subset for standardized treatment-related symptomatic toxicity monitoring in rectal cancer was identified. Assessment of the effectiveness and compliance of symptomatic toxicity monitoring using this subset is recommended.

Oncological outcome following Hartmann's procedure compared with anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-The type of procedure does not influence local recurrence or distant metastasis: A population-based study.

The type of surgical procedure used in rectal cancer treatment may affect cancer recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine whether the type of procedure influences oncological outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. We gathered data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry regarding patients with TNM Stage I-III rectal cancer who underwent R0/R1 surgery from 2013 to 2017. The outcomes after Hartmann's procedure (HP), anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) were compared, and a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed. The primary outcome of the study was the local recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes were distant metastasis, disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years as well as risk factors for local recurrence. A total of 4741 patients were included in the study: 614 underwent HP, 3075 underwent AR and 1052 underwent APR. Multivariable Cox regression revealed no difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis or disease-free survival. Overall survival was higher following AR (OR 0.62, CI 0.54-0.72). Risk factors for local recurrence were intraoperative bowel perforation (OR 2.41, CI 1.33-4.40), a pT4 tumour (OR 1.93, CI 1.11-3.4) and a positive circumferential resection margin (OR 5.62, CI 3.28-9.61). This nationwide study showed that the type of procedure did not affect the local recurrence rate or distant metastasis. In patients who are unfit for restorative surgery, HP is a viable alternative with oncological outcomes similar to those of APR.

Mangiferin: An effective agent against human malignancies.

Mangiferin is a bioactive substance present in high concentration in mangoes and also in some other fruits. Owing to its potential as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent against several types of cancer, this unique, significant, and well-researched polyphenol has received a lot of attention recently. It possesses the ability to treat cancers, including rectal cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, leukemia, gastric cancer, liver cancer, chronic pancreatitis, and lung cancer. It can control/regulate multiple key signaling pathways, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases/direct inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP)-binding protein with low propidium iodide (pl) (Smac/DIABLO) nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/protein 3 kinase (PI3K/Akt), transforming growth factor beta/suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic (TGF-β/SMAD), c-jun N-terminal kinase/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (JNK/p38-MAPK), and phosphor-I kappa B kinase (p-IκB), which are crucial to the development of cancers. By triggering apoptotic signals and halting the advancement of the cell cycle, it can also prevent some cancer cell types from proliferating and developing. It has been revealed that mangiferin targets a variety of adhesion molecules, cytokines, pro-inflammatory transcription factors, kinases, chemokines, growth factors, and cell-cycle proteins. By means of preventing the onset, advancement, and metastasis of cancer, these targets may mediate the chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of mangiferin. Mangiferin has confirmed potential benefits in lung, cervical, breast, brain, and prostate cancers as well as leukemia whether administered alone or in combination with recognized anticancer compounds. More clinical trials and research investigations are required to completely unleash the potential of mangiferin, which may lower the risk of cancer onset and act as a preventive and therapeutic alternative for a number of cancers.

What To Do With Suspected Nodal Regrowth on Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Follow-up in an Organ Preservation Approach for Rectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND: For nodal regrowth in patients with rectal cancer following watch-and-wait standardized protocols on diagnostic procedures and subsequent treatment are lacking. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of suspected nodal regrowth following an organ preservation approach. SETTINGS: Patients were included from national and institutional watch-and-wait -databases. DESIGN: Thirty-five rectal cancer patients with suspected nodal regrowth on magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively identified during watch-and-wait follow-up. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven of 35 patients followed watch-and-wait after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy and 8/35 followed watch-and-wait schedule after local excision for early rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic procedures, treatment and histopathological outcome. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 34 months. Median time from end of (chemo)radiotherapy or local excision to first detection of suspected nodal regrowth on magnetic resonance imaging following watch-and-wait was 9 and 10 months. After first detection, 17 of 35 patients underwent immediate treatment without further diagnostics, of whom 7 also had luminal regrowth. In 18 of 35 patients, additional diagnostic procedures were performed. In 4 of 18 patients, positron emission tomography-computed tomography or endorectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed and treatment was initiated based on increased nodal regrowth suspicion. In 14 of 18 patients, MRI was repeated after 8-12 weeks: growth of suspected lymph nodes was the most decisive factor to proceed to treatment. In 8 patients, repeated magnetic resonance imaging was combined with positron emission tomography-computed tomography and/or endorectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: in half of them it contributed to treatment initiation. In total, 34/35 patients were treated: 9 received (re-)irradiation and 33 underwent total mesorectal excision. In 27 of 33 patients, nodal regrowth was pathologically confirmed in the total mesorectal excision-resection specimen; 5 of 6 patients without nodal involvement had pathologically confirmed luminal regrowth. LIMITATIONS: Highly selected study population. CONCLUSIONS: During watch-and-wait follow-up of patients with rectal cancer in an organ preservation strategy, magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in diagnosis of nodal regrowth. Repeated magnetic resonance imaging after an interval can be helpful in making treatment decisions, and the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography and endorectal ultrasound-guided biopsy appears limited. See Video Abstract.

Clinical evaluation of the convolutional neural network‑based automatic delineation tool in determining the clinical target volume and organs at risk in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

Delineating the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) is crucial in rectal cancer radiotherapy. However, the accuracy of manual delineation (MD) is variable and the process is time consuming. Automatic delineation (AD) may be a solution to produce quicker and more accurate contours. In the present study, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based AD tool was clinically evaluated to analyze its accuracy and efficiency in rectal cancer. CT images were collected from 148 supine patients in whom tumor stage and type of surgery were not differentiated. The rectal cancer contours consisted of CTV and OARs, where the OARs included the bladder, left and right femoral head, left and right kidney, spinal cord and bowel bag. The MD contours reviewed and modified together by a senior radiation oncologist committee were set as the reference values. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JAC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to evaluate the AD accuracy. The correlation between CT slice number and AD accuracy was analyzed, and the AD accuracy for different contour numbers was compared. The time recorded in the present study included the MD time, AD time for different CT slice and contour numbers and the editing time for AD contours. The Pearson correlation coefficient, paired-sample t-test and unpaired-sample t-test were used for statistical analyses. The results of the present study indicated that the DSC, JAC and HD for CTV using AD were 0.80±0.06, 0.67±0.08 and 6.96±2.45 mm, respectively. Among the OARs, the highest DSC and JAC using AD were found for the right and left kidney, with 0.91±0.06 and 0.93±0.04, and 0.84±0.09 and 0.88±0.07, respectively, and HD was lowest for the spinal cord with 2.26±0.82 mm. The lowest accuracy was found for the bowel bag. The more CT slice numbers, the higher the accuracy of the spinal cord analysis. However, the contour number had no effect on AD accuracy. To obtain qualified contours, the AD time plus editing time was 662.97±195.57 sec, while the MD time was 3294.29±824.70 sec. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that AD can significantly improve efficiency and a higher number of CT slices and contours can reduce AD efficiency. The AD tool provides acceptable CTV and OARs for rectal cancer and improves efficiency for delineation.

Randomized clinical trial on accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus preoperative hyperfractionated radio-chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to compare pathological response rates after preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy with co-administration of chemotherapy based on 5FU (HART-CT) versus preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) in patients with resectable rectal cancer. Patients with T2/N+ or T3/any N rectal cancer were randomized either to HART twice a day (28 fractions of 1.5 Gy) to total dose 42 Gy or to HART-CT. Tumour regression grade was postoperatively assessed according to the 4-point scale as recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity of preoperative treatment, locoregional, and distant failure rates. There were 187 patients eligible for analysis: 95 in HART and 92 in the HART-CT. Median follow-up was 5.6 years. The analysis demonstrated a significantly higher chance of achieving pathologic complete response in HART-CT arm: complete response was achieved in 4/95, 4% (HART) and 11/92, 12% (HART-CT) (P = .045). The differences in OS and DFS, while tending to favour HART-CT, were not significant: OS (P = .13, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.63-1.06) and DFS (P = .32; HR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.69-1.13). The locoregional failure and distant metastases rates did not statistically differ between the trial arms. The rate of late complications was similar (P = .51), grade 3+ being 8% versus 11% in the HART/HART-CT group, respectively. The hyperfractionated preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent 5-Fu-based chemotherapy (HART-CT) improved pathological response rate compared to HART. This translated into favourable OS and DFS in HART-CT, but the differences did not reach the threshold for significance. A new hyperfractionated chemo-RT scheme is proposed. Histopathological major response (TRG 0-1) is associated with better clinical outcome.

An actinomycosis infection resembling peritoneal dissemination of rectal cancer: a case report

BackgroundActinomycosis is a suppurative and granulomatous inflammation commonly caused by Actinomyces israelii. Due to its rarity and the paucity of characteristic clinical features, diagnosis of intra-abdominal actinomycosis is challenging, especially when the patient has a treatment history of abdominal cancer.Case presentationThe patient is a 72-year-old man who has a history of multiple abdominal surgeries for rectal cancer, including low anterior resection for primary rectal cancer, partial hepatic resection for metachronous liver metastasis, and Hartmann surgery for local recurrence. The patient has also undergone parastomal hernia repair using the Sugarbaker method. One year after hernia repair, computed tomography (CT) identified a mass lesion between the abdominal wall and the mesh, suggesting the possibility of peritoneal recurrence of rectal cancer. The accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was evident via positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), while tumor marker levels were within the normal range. On laparotomy, the small intestine, abdominal wall, mesh, colon, and stoma were observed to be associated with the mass lesion, and en bloc resection was carried out. However, postoperative histopathological examination revealed an actinomyces infection without any cancerous cells.ConclusionsThis case highlights the challenges faced by surgeons regarding preoperative diagnosis of actinomycosis, especially when it occurs after the resection of abdominal cancer. Also, this case reminds us of the importance of a histopathological examination for abdominal masses or nodules before starting chemotherapy.

Locally advanced rectal cancer in a young adult affected with dyskeratosis congenita (Zinsser–Cole–Engman syndrome): a case report

BackgroundDyskeratosis congenita (DKC), also known as Zinsser–Cole–Engman syndrome, is a progressive genetic disease with a triad of reticulate skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy, and leukoplakia. Approximately 8–10% of patients with DKC develop malignancies, and cases of colorectal cancer with DKC in young people have been reported previously.Case presentationA 25-year-old man with DKC since approximately 10 years of age developed fever and lower abdominal discomfort. Diagnostic imaging revealed locally advanced rectal cancer with lymph node metastasis, direct invasion of the prostate, and pelvic abscess due to tumor microperforation (cT4bN2M0 cStage IIIC). Biopsy showed well to moderately differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma. Genetic testing was negative for RAS and BRAF gene mutations, and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was also negative. After sigmoid colostomy, the patient was treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with systemic chemotherapy (six courses of FOLFOX + panitumumab) followed by chemoradiation therapy (50.4 Gy with capecitabine). After TNT, the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes shrank. According to the findings of colonoscopy and magnetic resonance image (MRI), we diagnosed near complete response (near-CR) and decided to follow the patient without surgery by every 3 months re-evaluation. However, 5 months after TNT, tumor regrowth was detected on colonoscopy and imaging, and the patient underwent total pelvic exenteration. He developed paralytic ileus as a postoperative complication, and was discharged on the 38th postoperative day. Pathological examination revealed a residual tumor with invasion of the periprostatic tissue. There was no metastasis in the pararectal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes, but one extramural non-contiguous cancerous extension (tumor deposit) was observed (ypT4bN1cM0 ypStage IIIC). The patient has been free of recurrence for one year after surgery.ConclusionsDKC often develops into various tumors in the digestive system at an early age; therefore, appropriate surveillance may be required. In addition, considering that cancers in patients with DKC occur at a young age, fertility preservation and survivorship are also important, and adequate explanations and care should be provided to patients before and after treatment.

Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundRobotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes.MethodsFrom September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3.In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3–0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique.ResultsThe matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien–Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications.ConclusionsThe RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.

Colorectal cancer with a germline BRCA1 variant inherited paternally: a case report.

BRCA genes have well-known associations with breast and ovarian cancers. However, variations in the BRCA gene, especially germline variations, have also been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). We present the case of a rectal cancer with a germline BRCA1 variation inherited from the paternal side. A 39-year-old male was admitted with rectal cancer. The patient underwent surgical resection and the pathologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. Next-generation sequencing was performed and a BRCA1 variant was detected. Reviewing the public database and considering the young age of the patient, the variant was suggested to be germline. The patient's father had had prostate cancer and next-generation sequencing testing revealed an identical BRCA1 variant. In the BRCA cancer group, there is relatively little attention paid to male cancers. The accumulation of male CRC cases linked to BRCA variations may help clarify the potential pathological relationship between the two.

Impact of ACEI/ARB use on the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer: A meta‑analysis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive drugs. However, the impact that the use of ACEI and ARB drugs will have on the survival of patients with hypertension and cancer is still unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of ACEI and ARB use on the survival of patients with cancer. The Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to systematically analyze the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer treated with ACEIs or ARBs. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ACEI and ARB use and patient survival. The relationship between the survival of patients with certain types of cancer and ACEI and ARB use was evaluated using the calculated HRs. Patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, hepatocellular, lung, esophageal, gastric, colon, nasopharyngeal, head and neck tumors, gallbladder and rectal cancers that used ACEI and ARB analogs had significantly increased survival times, except for patients with breast cancer (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19; P<0.01) and uroepithelial carcinoma (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.69-1.94; P<0.01), who had significantly decreased survival times, when compared with patients who did not use these drugs. Analysis of the relationship between the use of ACEIs or ARBs alone or in combination on the overall survival of hypertensive patients with cancer demonstrated that the use of ACEIs alone (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; P<0.01) did not have a significant effect on the survival of these patients. By contrast, the survival time was increased in hypertensive patients with cancer who used either ARBs alone (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P<0.01) or a combination of ACEIs and ARBs (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P<0.01). The present meta-analysis demonstrated the potential effects of ACEI and ARB use on the overall survival of patients with cancer. Therefore, investigation of the underlying mechanisms of action of ACEIs and ARBs, as well as the identification of specific groups of patients who may benefit from these interventions, could potentially lead to novel therapeutic options and improve the prognosis of patients with cancer in the future.

Management of patients with reduced dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity receiving combined 5-fluoruracil-/capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy.

5‑Fluoruracil (5-FU) and its oral prodrug capecitabine are mainstays in combined chemoradiotherapy regimens. They are metabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). Pathogenic variants of the DPYD gene cause areduction in DPYD activity, leading to possibly severe toxicities. Therefore, patients receiving 5‑FU-/capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy should be tested for DPYD variants. However, there are limited clinical data on treatment adjustments and tolerability in patients with decreased DPYP activity receiving combined chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, aretrospective analysis of the toxicity profiles of patients with decreased DPYD activity treated at our center was conducted. For all patients receiving 5‑FU-/capecitabine-based chemo(radio)therapy at our department, DPYD activity was routinely tested. Genotyping of four DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A > T, and haplotype B3) was conducted according to the recommendation of the German Society for Hematooncology (DGHO) using TaqMan hydrolysis polymerase chain reaction (PCR; QuantStudy3, Thermo FisherScientific, Darmstadt). DPYD variants and activity score as well as clinical data (tumor entity, treatment protocol, dose adjustments, and toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) were assessed and reported. Of 261 tested patients, 21exhibited DPYD variants, 18of whom received chemoradiotherapy. All but one patient was treated for rectal or anal carcinoma. The observed rate of DPYD variants was 8.0%, and heterozygous haplotype B3 was the most common (5.75%). One patient exhibited ahomozygous DPYD variant. DPYD activity score was at least 0.5in heterozygous patients; chemotherapy dose was adjusted accordingly, with an applied dose of 50-75%. CTCAE grade2 skin toxicity (50%) and grade3 leukopenia (33.3%) were most common. One patient experienced atransient grade4 increase in transaminases. All high-grade toxicities were manageable with supportive treatment and transient. No CTCAE grade5 toxicities related to 5‑FU administration were observed. With dose reduction in heterozygous patients, toxicity was within the range of patients without DPYD variants. Our clinical data suggest that dose-adapted 5‑FU-/capecitabine-chemoradiotherapy regimens can be safely considered in patients with heterozygous clinically relevant DPYD variants, but that the optimal dosage still needs to be determined to avoid both increased toxicity and undertreatment in acurative setting.

Postoperative bowel dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer – Does a minimally invasive surgical approach improve outcomes?

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of MIS approaches for rectal cancer with long-term postoperative bowel dysfunction. Materials and methodsThis was an Institutional Review Board-approved observational cohort study including consecutive patients with rectal or rectosigmoid cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2017. The primary exposure was surgical approach, defined as open surgery or MIS (laparoscopy or robotic surgery). The primary outcome was major LARS, defined as a LARS score of ≥30. Subgroup analyses were performed by tumor height and type of MIS approach. ResultsAmong 749 potentially eligible patients, 514 (68.6 %) responded to the survey and were included for analysis. In total, 195 (37.9 %) patients underwent an MIS approach – 117 (60.0 %) laparoscopic and 78 (40.0 %) robotic. At a median follow-up of 6.1 (3.7–9.6) years from surgery, 222 patients (43.2 %) had major LARS (MIS: 41.0 % vs. open: 44.5 %, p = 0.44). On multivariable logistic regression, surgical approach had no association with major LARS (MIS, aOR: 1.21, 0.79–1.86). Older age (aOR: 1.03, 1.01–1.04), female sex (aOR: 1.75, 1.16–2.67), TME (aOR: 1.74, 1.01–3.02), diverting ileostomy (aOR: 2.74, 1.49–5.02) and radiation therapy (aOR: 2.63, 1.60–4.33) were all associated with major LARS. On subgroup analysis of patients with mid and low rectal cancers (n = 197), there remained no association between surgical approach and major LARS (MIS, aOR: 1.50, 0.68–3.33). ConclusionsMIS approach to rectal cancer surgery was not associated with decreased risk of major LARS and should not be touted as a reason to offer MIS.

The risk for rectal cancer recurrence and overall mortality is not increased in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer: a report from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry

IntroductionLimited data exists on oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery in men who have previously been diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC). This study aimed to assess overall mortality and rectal cancer recurrence in men previously diagnosed with PC who underwent bowel resection.MethodsData from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry identified men who had rectal cancer surgery between 2000 and 2016, and the National Prostate Cancer Registry was used to identify those with a prior PC diagnosis. Cox regression analysis with propensity score matching was employed for data analysis. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcome was recurrence for rectal cancer.ResultsOut of 13,299 men undergoing bowel resection for rectal cancer between 2000 and 2016, 1130 had a history of PC. Overall mortality did not significantly differ between men with and without a prior PC diagnosis. Cox regression analyses with propensity score matching revealed that men with previously diagnosed low- or intermediate-risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90) and high-risk PC (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.98) had lower overall mortality after rectal cancer surgery compared with men without a PC. There was no significant difference in rectal cancer recurrence between men with a previous low or intermediate-risk PC (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14) or high-risk PC (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52–1.01) compared with those without PC history.ConclusionMen undergoing rectal cancer surgery with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer do not experience an increased risk of rectal cancer recurrence or overall mortality compared with men without a previous history of prostate cancer.

ASO Author Reflections: The Economic Promise of "Watch and Wait" in Rectal Cancer: Insights from a Systematic Review.

ASO Author Reflections: The Economic Promise of "Watch and Wait" in Rectal Cancer: Insights from a Systematic Review.

Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) and Laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery are the two techniques that are increasingly used for rectal cancer, and both have their advantages and disadvantages. This meta-analysis will analyze the outcomes of both techniques to determine their relative performance and suitability. An extensive search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, followed by a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess both approaches for rectal cancer. This meta-analysis is comprised of fifteen RCTs. The conversion to open surgery (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74, P = 0.0002) was significantly lower in the RARS group. The outcomes like anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), surgical site infection (SSI), and intra-abdominal abscess showed no significant difference between the two groups. The reoperation rate (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95, P = 0.03) was lower in the robotic group. High heterogeneity was obtained when pooling data on operative time, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Oncological outcomes, including local recurrence, the number of harvested lymph nodes (LN) and distal resection margin showed no significant distinction among both groups, while the positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91, P = 0.01) was lower in the RARS group. RARS demonstrated a significantly higher rate of total mesorectal excision (TME) (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, P = 0.03). RARS is safe and feasible for rectal cancer patients and may be superior or equivalent to Laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery, but high-standard, large-scale trials are required to determine the best approach.

Incidence of rectal cancer after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: nationwide study.

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia. A particular problem arises in patients who have undergone subtotal colectomy leaving a rectal remnant. The risk of future rectal cancer must be accurately estimated and weighed against the risks of further surgery or surveillance. The aim of this study was to estimate the 10-year cumulative incidence of rectal cancer in such patients. A nationwide study using England's hospital administrative data was performed. A cohort of patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between April 2002 and March 2014 was identified. A competing risks survival analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative incidence of rectal cancer. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on endoscopic surveillance was investigated using time-trend analysis. A total of 8120 patients were included and 61 patients (0.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer was 0.26% (95% c.i. 0.17% to 0.39%), 0.49% (95% c.i. 0.36% to 0.68%), and 0.77% (95% c.i. 0.57% to 1.02%) at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. A previous diagnosis of colonic dysplasia (HR 3.34, 95% c.i. 1.01 to 10.97; P = 0.047), primary sclerosing cholangitis (HR 5.42, 95% c.i. 1.34 to 21.85; P = 0.018), and elective colectomy (HR 1.83, 95% c.i. 1.11 to 3.02; P = 0.018) was associated with an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Regarding endoscopic surveillance, there was a 43% decline in endoscopic procedures performed in 2020 (333 procedures) compared with 2019 (585 procedures). The incidence of rectal cancer after subtotal colectomy is low. Asymptomatic patients without evidence of rectal dysplasia should be carefully counselled on the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic proctectomy.

Persistent Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and persistent lymph node metastases (PLNM) after neoadjuvant treatment are at high risk of developing locoregional and distant metastasis, yet optimal postsurgical treatment of these patients is limited. To analyze the association of PLNM with pretreatment clinical parameters, intensity of neoadjuvant treatment, and long-term oncological outcomes. This cohort study is a post-hoc analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials (Surgical Oncology Working Group of Germany [CAO], Radiological Oncology Working Group of Germany [ARO], and Working Group for Internal Oncology in the German Cancer Society [AIO]) conducted in Germany in 1994, 2004, and 2012 that included 1948 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer recruited between February 1995 and January 2018. Statistical analysis was conducted between September 2023 and February 2024. Receiving preoperative fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT, comprising the preoperative group of CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and the control group of CAO/ARO/AIO-04), fluorouracil-based CRT plus oxaliplatin (experimental group of CAO/ARO/AIO-04), or total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with fluorouracil-based CRT plus oxaliplatin with induction or consolidation leucovorin calcium (folinic acid), fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin chemotherapy within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. The associations of PLNM with clinical parameters, intensity of neoadjuvant treatment, and cumulative incidences of LR, DM, and overall survival were assessed. A total of 1888 patients (1333 male participants [70.6%]; median [range] age, 62 [19-84] years) with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (clinical tumor stage 3 to 4 and/or clinically node-positive) treated within 3 consecutive clinical trials were analyzed. A total of 522 (29%) experienced PLNM; 378 had lymph node stage (ypN) 1 (20%) after neoadjuvant treatment (ypN) 1 (20%), and 174 had ypN2 (9%). Age, clinical T-stage, N-stage, grading, carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and time interval from completion of CRT to surgery were significantly associated with PLNM, whereas sex and tumor location were not. The percentage of patients with ypN2 stage was almost halved after TNT (18 of 293 patients [6%]) compared with patients treated with fluorouracil-based CRT (114 of 1009 patients [11.3%]; χ26 = 16.693; P = .01). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 54 (37-62) months, 5-year overall survival was 86.1% (95% CI, 83.9%-88.4%) for ypN0, 74.0% (95% CI, 83.9%-88.4%) for ypN1, and 43% for ypN2 (95% CI, 35.4%-52.2%) (P < .001). The 5-year cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant metastases were, respectively, 3% (95% CI, 2.1%-4.2%) and 20% (95% CI, 18%-23%) for ypN0, 6% (95% CI, 3.4%-8.8%) and 40% (95% CI, 34%-46%) for ypN1, and 19% (95% CI, 13%-26%) and 72% (95% CI, 63%-79%) for ypN2 (both P < .001). In this cohort study, PLNM unmasked an unfavorable phenotype of rectal cancer at high risk for treatment failure. More aggressive adjuvant treatment might be considered; however, risk-adapted surveillance strategies and early recurrence-directed surgery, if feasible, are important strategies in this group of patients with CRT- and/or chemotherapy-resistant disease.

Impact of radiotherapy on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer.

Impact of radiotherapy on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer.