Recruitment Of TATA-binding Protein Research Articles

Artificially recruited TATA-binding protein fails to remodel chromatin and does not activate three promoters that require chromatin remodeling.

Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether these two activities represent distinct functions of activation domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1, that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing the HIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation, artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at the CHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of the GAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.

TFIIA Has Activator-dependent and Core Promoter Functions in Vivo

The physiological role of TFIIA was investigated by analyzing transcription in a yeast strain that contains a TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutant (N2-1) defective for interacting with TFIIA. In cells containing N2-1, transcription from a set of artificial his3 promoters dependent on different activators is generally reduced by a similar extent, indicating that TFIIA function is largely nonselective for activators. In addition, TATA element utilization, a core promoter function, is altered at his3 promoters dependent on weak activators. Genomic expression analysis reveals that 3% of the genes are preferentially affected by a factor of 4 or more. Chimeras of affected promoters indicate that the sensitivity to the TFIIA-TBP interaction can map either to the upstream or core promoter region. Unlike wild-type TBP or TFIIA, the N2-1 derivative does not activate transcription when artificially recruited to the promoter via a heterologous DNA binding domain, indicating that TFIIA is important for transcription even in the absence of an activation domain. Taken together, these results suggest that TFIIA plays an important role in both activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo. Further, they suggest that TFIIA function may not be strictly related to the recruitment of TBP to promoters but may also involve a step after TBP recruitment.

A subunit of yeast TFIIIC participates in the recruitment of TATA-binding protein.

TFIIIC plays a key role in nucleating the assembly of the initiation factor TFIIIB on class III genes. We have characterized an essential gene, TFC8, encoding the 60-kDa polypeptide, tau60, present in affinity-purified TFIIIC. Hemagglutinin-tagged variants of tau60 were found to be part of TFIIIC-tDNA complexes and to reside at least in part in the downstream DNA-binding domain tauB. Unexpectedly, the thermosensitive phenotype of N-terminally tagged tau60 was suppressed by overexpression of tau95, which belongs to the tauA domain, and by two TFIIIB components, TATA-binding protein (TBP) and B"/TFIIIB90 (but not by TFIIIB70). Mutant TFIIIC was deficient in the activation of certain tRNA genes in vitro, and the transcription defect was selectively alleviated by increasing TBP concentration. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments support a direct interaction between TBP and tau60. It is suggested that tau60 links tauA and tauB domains and participates in TFIIIB assembly via its interaction with TBP.

Analysis of TFIIA function In vivo: evidence for a role in TATA-binding protein recruitment and gene-specific activation.

Activation of transcription can occur by the facilitated recruitment of TFIID to promoters by gene-specific activators. To investigate the role of TFIIA in TFIID recruitment in vivo, we exploited a class of yeast TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that is activation and DNA binding defective. We found that co-overexpression of TOA1 and TOA2, the genes that encode yeast TFIIA, overcomes the activation defects caused by the TBP mutants. Using a genetic screen, we isolated a new class of TFIIA mutants and identified three regions on TFIIA that are likely to be involved in TBP recruitment or stabilization of the TBP-TATA complex in vivo. Amino acid replacements in only one of these regions enhance TFIIA-TBP-DNA complex formation in vitro, suggesting that the other regions are involved in regulatory interactions. To determine the relative importance of TFIIA in the regulation of different genes, we constructed yeast strains to conditionally deplete TFIIA levels prior to gene activation. While the activation of certain genes, such as INO1, was dramatically impaired by TFIIA depletion, activation of other genes, such as CUP1, was unaffected. These data suggest that TFIIA facilitates DNA binding by TBP in vivo, that TFIIA may be regulated by factors that target distinct regions of the protein, and that promoters vary significantly in the degree to which they require TFIIA for activation.

Recruitment of TBP or TFIIB to a Promoter Proximal Position Leads to Stimulation of RNA Polymerase II Transcription without Activator Proteins bothin Vivoandin Vitro

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators may function, at least in part, to facilitate the assembly of the RNA polymerase II (pol II) preinitiation complex at the core promoter region through their interaction with a subset of components of the basal transcription machinery. Previous studies have shown that artificial tethering of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the promoter region is sufficient to stimulate pol II transcription in yeast. To test whether this phenomenon is a general one in eukaryotic pol II transcription, the DNA-binding domain of yeast GAL4 was fused to eitherXenopus laevisTBP or TFIIB in order to enable these factors to be efficiently positioned near the transcription start site in a GAL4-binding site-dependent manner. We found that GAL4-xTBP as well as GAL4-xTFIIB directed an increased level of transcription without involvement of the transcriptional activator, suggesting that incorporation of these basal factors into a preinitiation complex (PIC) is a major rate-limiting step accelerated by activator proteins in metazoans. These results show that transcription activation by artificial recruitment of basal transcription machinery can be observed in general among eukaryotic transcription bothin vivoandin vitro.Furthermore, failure of recovery of transcription by adding GAL4-xTFIIB after depletion of endogenous TBP with TATA oligo competitor suggests that recruitment of TBP cannot be bypassed for Pol II transcription.

Recruitment of the TATA-binding protein to the HIV-1 promoter is a limiting step for Tat transactivation.

To examine the functional interaction between HIV-1 Tat protein and the TATA-binding protein (TBP). HIV long terminal repeat reporter plasmids were cotransfected into mammalian and Drosophila insect cells with expression vectors encoding Tat and vectors encoding TBP either alone or linked to an heterologous DNA-binding domain. The activity of the different reporters was compared in the presence or absence of Tat or TBP, or both, upon cotransfections into human and Drosophila insect cell lines. Tat protein is unable to transactivate enhancerless HIV-1 minimal promoter bearing only the TATA box and TAR. Artificial recruitment of human TBP (hTBP) to the enhancerless HIV minimal promoter was found to trigger gene expression and coexpression of Tat resulted in a marked synergy. Tat protein cooperated with DNA-bound hTBP by inducing high levels of processive viral transcripts. Synergy between Tat and hTBP was also observed when both factors were targeted to a promoter DNA template. The functional cooperation between TBP and Tat was further demonstrated using the Drosophila Schneider SL2 cells. In these cells Tat protein alone was ineffective; however, coexpression of Drosophila TBP and Tat resulted in a trans-activating response region-dependent synergistic transactivation of basal transcription. The strong synergy between TBP and Tat in the absence of any DNA-bound activator suggests that Tat stimulates transcription in an activator-independent manner most likely by a functional interaction with general transcription factors that occurs after TBP recruitment. Thus, efficient recruitment of TBP represents a limiting step for Tat transactivation.

Recruitment of Human TBP Selectively Activates RNA Polymerase II TATA-dependent Promoters

An increasing body of evidence suggests that eukaryotic activators stimulate polymerase II transcription by facilitating the assembly of the functional basal machinery at the promoter. Here we describe experiments that provide added support for the idea that recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) is a rate-limiting step for transcription activation in mammalian cells. We found that, in human cell lines, recruitment of TBP to a promoter, as a GAL4-TBP fusion protein, can provide a substantial activation of transcription. Activation mediated by the hTBP, tethered to promoter DNA, is strictly dependent upon the presence of a functional TATA element, and it directs faithful transcription initiation. Interestingly, GAL4-hTBP activation was not observed from initiator (Inr) -dependent TATA-less promoters. These results suggest that TBP binding to DNA is not a rate-limiting step for the initial stages of TFIID recruitment to initiator-dependent TATA-less promoters. Finally, we provide evidence that synergy between GAL4-hTBP and defined transcription domains is restricted to activators, such as VP16 and Tat, which are likely to function at steps subsequent to the TFIID recruitment. These findings strengthen the idea that recruitment of TBP represents an important mechanism of activation of TATA-dependent promoters, and on the other hand, they suggest that TBP-DNA interactions are largely dispensable for specific transcription of initiator dependent TATA-less promoters.

Promoter activity of Tat at steps subsequent to TATA-binding protein recruitment.

Artificial recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to many eukaryotic promoters bypasses DNA-bound activator function. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Tat is an unconventional activator that up-regulates transcription from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) through binding to a nascent RNA sequence, TAR. Because this LTR and its cognate activator have atypical features compared to a standard RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) transcriptional unit, the precise limiting steps for HIV-1 transcription and how Tat resolves these limitations remain incompletely understood. We thus constructed human TBP fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 to determine whether recruitment of TBP is one rate-limiting step in HIV-1 LTR transcription and whether Tat functions to recruit TBP. As a control, we compared the activity of the adenovirus E1b promoter. Our findings indicate that TBP tethering to the E1b promoter fully effected transcription to the same degree achievable with the potent GAL4-VP16 activator. By contrast, TBP recruitment to the HIV-1 LTR, although necessary for conferring Tat responsiveness, did not bypass a physical need for Tat in achieving activated transcription. These results document that the HIV-1 and the E1b promoters are transcriptionally limited at different steps; the major rate-limiting step for E1b is recruitment of TBP, while activation of the HIV-1 LTR requires steps in addition to TBP recruitment. We suggest that Tat acts to accelerate rate-limiting steps after TBP recruitment.

A new class of activation-defective TATA-binding protein mutants: evidence for two steps of transcriptional activation in vivo.

Using a genetic screen, we isolated four TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that are specifically defective in vivo for the response to acidic activators. In contrast to previously described activation-defective TBP mutants, these TBP derivatives are not specifically defective for interactions with TATA elements or TFIIA. Three of these derivatives interact normally with a TATA element, TFIIA, TFIIB, or an acidic activation domain; presumably, they affect another protein-protein interaction important for transcriptional activation. The remaining derivative (with F-237 replaced by D) binds a TATA element with wild-type affinity, but the TBP-TATA complex has an altered electrophoretic mobility and interacts poorly with TFIIA and TFIIB; this suggests that the conformation of the TBP-TATA element complex plays a role in transcriptional activation. To determine the step at which the TBP derivatives were unable to activate transcription, we utilized an artificial recruitment assay in which TBP is targeted to the promoter via fusion to the LexA DNA-binding domain. Consistent with previous evidence that acidic activators can increase recruitment of TBP to the promoter in vivo, the activation defect of some of these TBP derivatives can be corrected by artificial recruitment. In contrast, the activation defect of the other TBP derivatives is not bypassed by artificial recruitment. Thus, these TBP mutants define two steps in the process of transcriptional stimulation by acidic activators: efficient recruitment to the TATA element and a postrecruitment interaction with a component(s) of the initiation complex.

Mechanisms of transcriptional activation and repression can both involve TFIID.

Regulation of transcription involves the activities of activators and repressors. Recent experiments have provided evidence that the function of both types of regulators can involve interactions with one or more component of the basal transcription machinery. A principal target appears to be TFIID, which consists of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and associated factors (TAFs). Here we describe experiments that provide added support for the idea that interactions affecting TFIID can play important roles in both activation and repression. We show, using transfection assays in Drosophila Schneider cells, that recruitment of TBP to a promoter as a GAL4-TBP fusion protein can provide a substantial activation of transcription. The conserved core of TBP is necessary and sufficient for this effect, which was observed with both TATA-containing and TATA-lacking basal promoters. These findings extend experiments performed in yeast, and strengthen the idea that recruitment of TBP (TFIID) can be an important mechanism of activation. We also provide further support for the idea that TBP can be a target for a transcriptional repressor, the Drosophila Even-skipped protein (Eve). We present evidence that the homeodomain, which is necessary for binding TBP in vitro, can also be required for repression in vivo, independent of its role in DNA binding. On the other hand, deletion of the alanine/proline-rich region that is essential for repression in vivo and TBP binding in vitro does not significantly affect DNA binding by the purified protein. These results strengthen the view that TBP, either directly or indirectly as a component of TFIID, can be a target of both activators and repressors.

Recruiting TATA-Binding Protein to a Promoter: Transcriptional Activation without an Upstream Activator

The binding of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA element is the first step in the initiation of RNA polymerase II transcription from many promoters in vitro. It has been proposed that upstream activator proteins stimulate transcription by recruiting TBP to the promoter, thus facilitating the assembly of a transcription complex. However, the role of activator proteins acting at this step to stimulate transcription in vivo remains largely speculative. To test whether recruitment of TBP to the promoter is sufficient for transcriptional activation in vivo, we constructed a hybrid protein containing TBP of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4. Our results show that TBP recruited by the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to promoters bearing a GAL4-binding site can interact with the TATA element and direct high levels of transcription. This finding indicates that binding of TBP to promoters in S. cerevisiae is a major rate-limiting step accelerated by upstream activator proteins.

Dimerization of the TATA Binding Protein

The TATA binding protein (TBP) is a central component of all eukaryotic transcription machineries. The recruitment of TBP to the promoter is slow and possibly rate limiting in transcription complex assembly. In an effort to understand the nature of this potential rate-limiting step, we have investigated the physical state of TBP prior to DNA binding. By chemical cross-linking, gel filtration chromatography, and protein affinity chromatography, we find that the conserved carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain of human TBP dimerizes when not bound to DNA. The data completely support the proposed dimeric structure of plant TBP, previously determined by x-ray crystallography. TBP dimers are quite stable, having an approximate equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) in the low nanomolar range. The dimerization interface appears to be dominated by hydrophobic forces, as predicted by the crystal structure. TBP dimers do not bind DNA, but they must dissociate into monomers before stably binding to the TATA box. Dissociation of TBP dimers appears to be relatively slow, and as such has the potential to dictate the kinetics of DNA binding.

Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators may stimulate RNA polymerase II activity by promoting assembly of preinitiation complexes on promoters through their interactions with one or more components of the basal machinery. On the basis of its central role in initiating transcription-complex formation upon binding to the TATA box, the general transcription factor TFIID, which includes the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and several TBP-associated factors, has been implicated as a target for activators. Consistent with this idea, an increasing number of activators have been reported to bind directly to TBP. To assess the functional importance of these in vitro interactions for transcriptional regulation in vivo, we made use of a novel strategy in yeast to show that a physical interaction with TBP is sufficient for a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein to increase initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. These results imply that binding of TFIID to promoter elements is a limiting step in transcription complex assembly in vivo.

Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain.

Biochemical analyses have suggested potential targets for transcriptional activation domains, which include several components of the RNA polymerase II machinery, as well as the chromatin template. Here we examine the mechanism of transcriptional activation in yeast cells by connecting a heterologous DNA-binding domain (LexA) to the TATA-binding protein (TBP). LexA-TBP efficiently activates transcription from a promoter containing a LexA operator upstream of a TATA element. Activation is promoter-specific and is sensitive to mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TBP; hence it is not due to a fortuitous activation domain on TBP. Thus a promoter-bound protein lacking an activation domain can stimulate transcription if it is directly connected to TBP. This suggests that recruitment of TBP to the promoter can be a rate-limiting step for transcription in vivo, and that interactions between activation domains and factors that function after TBP recruitment can be bypassed for activation.

Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo.

The rate at which the TATA-binding protein (TBP) interacts with the TATA element and promotes transcription by RNA polymerase II was determined in yeast cells. A TBP derivative with altered TATA-element specificity was rapidly induced, and transcription from promoters with appropriately mutated TATA elements was measured. Without a functional activator protein, basal transcription was observed only after a lag of several hours. In contrast, GCN4-activated transcription occurred rapidly upon induction of the TBP derivative. These results suggest that accessibility of TBP to the chromatin template in vivo is rate limiting and that activation domains increase recruitment of TBP to the promoter.

Functional and biochemical interaction of the HTLV-I Tax1 transactivator with TBP.

The human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) codes for the potent transcriptional activator, Tax1, which induces the enhancer activity of various enhancer elements. In the case of the 21 bp enhancer of the HTLV-I provirus, this induction is correlated with the association of Tax1 with this DNA element via a specific cellular factor. That the indirect association of Tax1 with DNA can lead to transcriptional activation has also been supported by the study of chimeric GAL4-Tax1 proteins. The GAL4-Tax1 stimulatory effect exhibits a strong self-squelching. In order to determine whether Tax1 interacts directly with the general transcription factors or via intermediary molecules, we have analyzed how overexpression of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and TFIIB protein affects the squelching curve of GAL4-Tax1. The data presented here show that overexpression of TBP strongly increases the stimulatory effect of GAL4-Tax1, causes a displacement of the maximum of the squelching curve and partially alleviates the squelching. Under similar conditions TFIIB exhibited little effect. From these results we conclude that Tax1 can increase the recruitment of TBP by directly interacting with this protein. Biochemical experiments with purified proteins produced in bacteria confirmed that Tax1 can interact with TBP but not with TFIIB. Tax1 interacts with the conserved C-terminal part of TBP. Analysis of the ability of different mutants of Tax1 fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain to activate transcription and to associate with TBP, showed that these activities are correlated. However, since one transcriptionally inactive mutant was able to interact efficiently with TBP in vitro, it would appear that an event other than the Tax1-TBP contact also intervenes in the activation of transcription by Tax1.