BRG1 Recruitment Research Articles

P38 Regulates Expression of Osteoblast-specific Genes by Phosphorylation of Osterix

Osterix, a zinc finger transcription factor, is specifically expressed in osteoblasts and osteocytes of all developing bones. Because no bone formation occurs in Osx-null mice, Osterix is thought to be an essential regulator of osteoblast differentiation. We report that, in several mesenchymal and osteoblastic cell types, BMP-2 induces an increase in expression of the two isoforms of Osterix arising from two alternative promoters. We identified a consensus Sp1 sequence (GGGCGG) as Osterix binding regions in the fibromodulin and the bone sialoprotein promoters in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we show that Osterix is a novel substrate for p38 MAPK in vitro and in vivo and that Ser-73 and Ser-77 are the regulatory sites phosphorylated by p38. Our data also demonstrate that Osterix is able to increase recruitment of p300 and Brg1 to the promoters of its target genes fibromodulin and bone sialoprotein in vivo and that it directly associates with these cofactors through protein-protein interactions. Phosphorylation of Osterix at Ser-73/77 increased its ability to recruit p300 and SWI/SNF to either fibromodulin or bone sialoprotein promoters. We therefore propose that Osterix binds to Sp1 sequences on target gene promoters and that its phosphorylation by p38 enhances recruitment of coactivators to form transcriptionally active complexes.

BRG1-Mediated Chromatin Remodeling Regulates Differentiation and Gene Expression of T Helper Cells

During T helper cell differentiation, distinct programs of gene expression play a key role in defining the immune response to an environmental challenge. How chromatin remodeling events at the associated cytokine loci control differentiation is not known. We found that the ATP-dependent remodeling enzyme subunit BRG1 was required for T helper 2 (Th2) differentiation and Th2 cytokine transcription. BRG1 binding to cytokine genes was regulated by the extent of differentiation, the extent of activation, and cell fate. BRG1 was required for some features of the chromatin structure in target genes (DNase I hypersensitivity and histone acetylation), suggesting that BRG1 remodeling activity was directly responsible for changes in gene expression. NFAT and STAT6 activity were required for BRG1 recruitment to the Th2 locus control region, and STAT6 associated with BRG1 in a differentiation-inducible manner, suggesting direct recruitment of BRG1 to the bound loci. Together, these findings suggest BRG1 interprets differentiation signals and plays a causal role in gene regulation, chromatin structure, and cell fate.

Gene-specific Requirement of a Nuclear Protein, IκB-ζ, for Promoter Association of Inflammatory Transcription Regulators

Expression of many inflammatory genes is induced through activation of the transcription factor NF-kappaB. In contrast to the advanced understanding of cytoplasmic control of NF-kappaB activation, its regulation in the nucleus has not been fully understood despite its importance in selective gene expression. We previously identified an inducible nuclear protein, IkappaB-zeta, and demonstrated that this molecule is indispensable for the expression of a group of NF-kappaB-regulated genes. In this study, we established a unique gene induction system, in which IkappaB-zeta is expressed independently of inflammatory stimuli, to specifically investigate the molecular basis underlying IkappaB-zeta-mediated gene activation. We show that in the presence of IkappaB-zeta other primary response genes are dispensable for the expression of the target secondary response genes. ChIP analyses revealed that IkappaB-zeta is required for stimulus-induced recruitment of NF-kappaB onto the target promoter in a gene-specific manner. Surprisingly, IkappaB-zeta is also necessary for the gene-selective promoter recruitment of another inflammatory transcription factor, C/EBPbeta, and the chromatin remodeling factor Brg1. We propose a new gene regulatory mechanism underlying the selective expression of inflammatory genes.

Prohibitin and the SWI/SNF ATPase subunit BRG1 are required for effective androgen antagonist-mediated transcriptional repression of androgen receptor-regulated genes

Androgen antagonists or androgen deprivation are the primary therapeutic modalities for the treatment of prostate cancer. Invariably, however, the disease becomes progressive and unresponsive to androgen ablation therapy (hormone refractory). The molecular mechanisms by which androgen antagonists inhibit prostate cancer proliferation are not fully defined. In this study, we identify two molecules which are required for effective prostate cancer cell responsiveness to androgen antagonists. We establish that androgen receptor (AR)-dependent transcriptional suppression by androgen antagonists requires the tumor suppressor prohibitin. This requirement for prohibitin was demonstrated using structurally-distinct androgen antagonists, stable and transient knockdown of prohibitin and transfected and endogenous AR-responsive genes. The SWI-SNF complex core ATPase BRG1, but not its closely-related counterpart ATPase BRM, is required for this repressive action of prohibitin on AR-responsive promoters. Androgen antagonists induce recruitment of prohibitin and BRG1 to endogenous AR-responsive promoters and induce a physical association between AR and prohibitin and BRG1. The recruitment of prohibitin to endogenous AR-responsive promoters is dependent upon antagonist-bound AR. Prohibitin binding in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter results in the recruitment of BRG1 and the dissociation of p300 from the PSA promoter. These findings suggest that prohibitin may function through BRG1-mediated local chromatin remodeling activity and the removal of p300-mediated acetylation to produce androgen antagonist-mediated transcriptional repression. Furthermore, in addition to its necessary role in AR-mediated transcriptional repression, we demonstrate that prohibitin is required for full and efficient androgen antagonist-mediated growth suppression of prostate cancer cells.

Inhibition of cyclin D1 gene transcription by Brg-1

The evolutionarily conserved SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling complex regulates cellular proliferation. A catalytic subunit, BRG-1, is frequently down regulated, silenced or mutated in malignant cells, however, the mechanism by which BRG-1 may function as a tumor suppressor or block breast cancer cellular proliferation is not understood. The cyclin D1 gene is a collaborative oncogene overexpressed in greater than 50% of human breast cancers. Herein, BRG-1 inhibited DNA synthesis and cyclin D1 expression in human MCF-7 breast cancer epithelial cells. The cyclin D1 promoter AP-1 and CRE sites were required for repression by BRG-1 in promoter assays. BRG-1 deficient cells abolished and siRNA to BRG-1 reduced, formation of the BRG-1 chromatin complex. The endogenous cyclin D1 promoter AP-1 site bound BRG-1. Estradiol treatment of MCF7 cells induced recruitment of BRG-1 to the endogenous hpS2 gene promoter. Estradiol, which induced cyclin D1 abundance, was associated with a reduction in recruitment of the co-repressors HP1α/HDAC1 to the endogenous cyclin D1 promoter AP-1/BRG-1 binding sites. These studies suggest the endogenous cyclin D1 promoter BRG-1 binding site functions as a molecular scaffold in the context of local chromatin upon which coactivators and corepressors are recruited to regulate cyclin D1.

Determinants of a transcriptionally competent environment at the GM-CSF promoter

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is produced by T cells, but not B cells, in response to immune signals. GM-CSF gene activation in response to T-cell stimulation requires remodelling of chromatin associated with the gene promoter, and these changes do not occur in B cells. While the CpG methylation status of the murine GM-CSF promoter shows no correlation with the ability of the gene to respond to activation, we find that the basal chromatin environment of the gene promoter influences its ability to respond to immune signals. In unstimulated T cells but not B cells, the GM-CSF promoter is selectively marked by enrichment of histone acetylation, and association of the chromatin-remodelling protein BRG1. BRG1 is removed from the promoter upon activation concomitant with histone depletion and BRG1 is required for efficient chromatin remodelling and transcription. Increasing histone acetylation at the promoter in T cells is paralleled by increased BRG1 recruitment, resulting in more rapid chromatin remodelling, and an associated increase in GM-CSF mRNA levels. Furthermore, increasing histone acetylation in B cells removes the block in chromatin remodelling and transcriptional activation of the GM-CSF gene. These data are consistent with a model in which histone hyperacetylation and BRG1 enrichment at the GM-CSF promoter, generate a chromatin environment competent to respond to immune signals resulting in gene activation.

A Novel Role of Brg1 in the Regulation of SRF/MRTFA-dependent Smooth Muscle-specific Gene Expression

Serum response factor (SRF) is a key regulator of smooth muscle differentiation, proliferation, and migration. Myocardin-related transcription factor A (MRTFA) is a co-activator of SRF that can induce expression of SRF-dependent, smooth muscle-specific genes and actin/Rho-dependent genes, but not MAPK-regulated growth response genes. How MRTFA and SRF discriminate between these sets of target genes is still unclear. We hypothesized that SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, containing Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1) or Brahma (Brm), may play a role in this process. Results from Western blotting and qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that dominant negative Brg1 blocked the ability of MRTFA to induce expression of smooth muscle-specific genes, but not actin/Rho-dependent early response genes, in fibroblasts. In addition, dominant negative Brg1 attenuated expression of smooth muscle-specific genes in primary cultures of smooth muscle cells. MRTFA overexpression did not induce expression of smooth muscle-specific genes in SW13 cells, which lack endogenous Brg1 or Brm. Reintroduction of Brg1 or Brm into SW13 cells restored their responsiveness to MRTFA. Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that Brg1, SRF, and MRTFA form a complex in vivo, and Brg1 directly binds MRTFA, but not SRF, in vitro. Results from chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that dominant negative Brg1 significantly attenuated the ability of MRTFA to increase SRF binding to the promoters of smooth muscle-specific genes, but not early response genes. Together these data suggest that Brg1/Brm containing SWI/SNF complexes play a critical role in regulating expression of SRF/MRTFA-dependent smooth muscle-specific genes but not SRF/MRTFA-dependent early response genes.

Sequential Recruitment of PCAF and BRG1 Contributes to Myogenin Activation in 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced Early Differentiation of Rhabdomyosarcoma-derived Cells

Myogenin and its upstream regulator MyoD are known to be required for myogenic cell differentiation. Although both of them can be expressed in rhabdomyosarcoma-derived RD cells, the cells are unable to undergo full-scale terminal myogenic differentiation. 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) has been found to be functional in the induction of RD cell differentiation, whereas its mechanism is not fully understood. By using quantitative real-time-based chromatin immunoprecipitation and real-time reverse transcription-PCR-based promoter activity assays, we examined the activation mechanism of the myogenin gene during TPA-induced differentiation of the RD cells. We have shown that a histone acetyltransferase PCAF and ATPase subunit BRG1 of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex are sequentially recruited to the promoter of the myogenin gene. Both PCAF and BRG1 are also involved in the activation of the myogenin gene. In addition, we have found that the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for BRG1 recruitment in TPA-mediated myogenin induction. We propose that there are two distinct activation steps for the induction of myogenin in TPA-induced early differentiation of RD cells: 1) an early step that requires PCAF activity to acetylate core histones and MyoD to initiate myogenin gene expression, and 2) a later step that requires p38-dependent activity of the SWI/SNF remodeling complex to provide an open conformation for the induction of myogenin. Our studies reveal an essential role for epigenetic regulation in TPA-induced differentiation of RD cells and provide potential drug targets for future treatment of the rhabdomyosarcoma.

Estrogen Receptor α and the Activating Protein-1 Complex Cooperate during Insulin-like Growth Factor-I-induced Transcriptional Activation of the pS2/TFF1 Gene

Insulin like growth factor I (IGF-I) displays estrogenic activity in breast cancer cells. This activity is strictly dependent on the presence of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha). However the precise molecular mechanisms involved in this process are still unclear. IGF-I treatment induces phosphorylation of the AF1 domain of ERalpha and activation of estrogen regulated genes. These genes are characterized by important differences in promoter architecture and response element composition. We show that promoter structure is crucial for IGF-I-induced transcription activation. We demonstrate that on a complex promoter such as the pS2/TFF1 promoter, which contains binding sites for ERalpha and for the activating protein-1 (AP1) complex, transcriptional activation by IGF-I requires both ERalpha and the AP1 complex. IGF-I is unable to stimulate transcription of an estrogen-regulated gene under the control of a minimal promoter containing only a binding site for ERalpha. We propose a molecular mechanism with stepwise assembly of the AP1 complex and ERalpha during transcription activation of pS2/TFF1 by IGF-I. IGF-I stimulation induces rapid phosphorylation and an increase in protein levels of the AP1 complex. Binding of the phosphorylated AP1 complex to the pS2/TFF1 promoter allows recruitment of the chromatin remodeling factor Brg1 followed by binding of ERalpha via its interaction with c-Jun.

Chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex and STAT4 activation synergistically induce IL-12Rβ2 expression during human Th1 cell differentiation

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a key cytokine for the development of T helper type 1 (Th1) responses; however, naïve CD4(+) T cells do not express IL-12Rbeta2, and are therefore unresponsive to IL-12. We have examined the mechanisms that control Th1-specific expression of the human IL-12Rbeta2 gene at early time points after T-cell stimulation. We have identified a Th1-specific enhancer element that binds signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) in vivo in developing Th1 but not Th2 cells. T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling induced histone hyperacetylation and recruitment of BRG1, the ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF-like BAF chromatin remodeling complex, to the IL-12Rbeta2 regulatory regions and was associated with low-level gene transcription at the IL-12Rbeta2 locus. However, high-level IL-12Rbeta2 expression required TCR triggering in the presence of IL-12. Our results indicate a synergistic role of TCR-induced chromatin remodeling and cytokine-induced STAT4 activation to direct IL-12Rbeta2 expression during Th1 cell development.

Lineage-specific activators affect β-globin locus chromatin in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors

During development, the regulated expression of tissue-specific genes can be preceded by their potentiation, that is, by chromatin activation in progenitor cells. For example, the human β-like globin genes are potentiated in a gene- and developmental-specific manner in hematopoietic progenitors. Developmental regulation of human β-gene expression in erythroid cells is mostly determined by transcriptional activators; however, it is not clear how gene-specific potentiation is set in hematopoietic progenitors. Using human and transgenic multipotent hematopoietic progenitors, we demonstrate that human β-globin locus activation is characterized by TBP, NF-E2, CBP and BRG1 recruitment at both the Locus Control Region and human β-gene promoter. Our results further indicate that in hematopoietic progenitors, EKLF influences chromatin organization at the human β-globin locus and is instrumental for human β-gene potentiation. Thus, we show that lineage-specific transcriptional activators expressed at basal levels in progenitor cells can participate in gene potentiation.

Chromatin Remodeling and Control of Cell Proliferation by Progestins via Cross Talk of Progesterone Receptor with the Estrogen Receptors and Kinase Signaling Pathways

Transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter can be induced by glucocorticoids or progestins. Progesterone treatment of cultured cells carrying an integrated single copy of an MMTV transgene leads to recruitment of progesterone receptor (PR), SWI/SNF, and SNF2h-related complexes to MMTV promoter. Recruitment is accompanied by selective displacement of histones H2A and H2B from the nucleosome B. In nucleosomes assembled on promoter sequences, SWI/SNF displaces histones H2A and H2B from MMTV nucleosome B, but not from other MMTV nucleosomes or from an rDNA promoter nucleosome. Thus, the outcome of nucleosome remodeling by purified SWI/SNF depends on the DNA sequence. On the other hand, 5 min after hormone treatment, the cytoplasmic signaling cascade Src/Ras/Erk is activated via an interaction of PR with the estrogen receptor, which activates Src. As a consequence of Erk activation PR is phosphorylated, Msk1 is activated, and a ternary complex PR-Erk-Msk1 is recruited to MMTV nucleosome B. Msk1 phosphorylates H3 at serine 10, which is followed by acetylation at lysine 14, displacement of HP1gamma, and recruitment of Brg1, PCAF, and RNA polymerase II. Blocking Erk activation or Msk1 activity prevents induction of the MMTV transgene. Thus, the rapid nongenomic effects of progestins are essential for their transcriptional effects on certain progestin target genes. In rat endometrial stromal cells, picomolar concentrations of progestins trigger the cross talk of PR with ERbeta that activates the Erk and Akt kinase pathways leading to cell proliferation in the absence of direct transcriptional effects of the ligand-activated PR. Thus, depending on the cellular context rapid kinase activation and transcriptional effect play different roles in the physiological response to progestins.

Induction of Progesterone Target Genes Requires Activation of Erk and Msk Kinases and Phosphorylation of Histone H3

How genes are regulated in the context of chromatin is a central question of biology. Steroid hormones control gene expression via interaction of their receptors with target sequences on DNA but can also activate cytoplasmic signaling cascades. Here we report that rapid Erk activation by progestins participates in induction of target genes by preparing the chromatin for transcription. Five minutes after hormone treatment, Erk activation leads to phosphorylation of the progesterone receptor (PR), activation of Msk1, and recruitment of a complex of the three proteins to a nucleosome on the MMTV promoter. Msk1 phosphorylates histone H3, leading to displacement of HP1gamma and recruitment of Brg1 and RNA polymerase II. Cell-free experiments show a direct interaction between PR, Erk, and Msk1 and support the importance of H3 phosphorylation for nucleosome remodeling. Inhibition of Msk1 activation blocks recruitment of the kinase complex, H3 phosphorylation, and HP1gamma displacement, thus precluding remodeling and induction of the promoter.

Recruitment of the SWI/SNF protein Brg1 by a multiprotein complex effects transcriptional repression in murine erythroid progenitors

SWI/SNF complexes are involved in both activation and repression of transcription. While one of two homologous ATPases, Brg1 [Brm (Brahma)-related gene 1] or Brm, is required for their chromatin remodelling function, less is known about how these complexes are recruited to DNA. We recently established that a DNA-binding complex containing TAL1/SCL, E47, GATA-1, LMO2 and Ldb1 stimulates P4.2 (protein 4.2) transcription in erythroid progenitors via two E box-GATA elements in the gene's proximal promoter. We show here that the SWI/SNF protein Brg1 is also associated with this complex and that both the E box and GATA DNA-binding sites in these elements are required for Brg1 recruitment. Further, Brg1 occupancy of the P4.2 promoter decreased with terminal erythroid differentiation in association with increased P4.2 transcription, while enforced expression of Brg1 in murine erythroleukaemia cells reduced P4.2 gene expression. Overexpression of Brg1 was associated with increased occupancy of the P4.2 promoter by the nuclear co-repressor mSin3A and HDAC2 (histone deacetylase 2) and with reduced histone H3 and H4 acetylation. Finally, a specific HDAC inhibitor attenuated Brg1-directed repression of P4.2 promoter activity in transfected cells. These results provide insight into the mechanism by which SWI/SNF proteins are recruited to promoters and suggest that transcription of P4.2, and most likely other genes, is actively repressed until the terminal differentiation of erythroid progenitors.

Lineage-specific activators affect β-globin locus chromatin in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors

During development, the regulated expression of tissue-specific genes can be preceded by their potentiation, that is, by chromatin activation in progenitor cells. For example, the human beta-like globin genes are potentiated in a gene- and developmental-specific manner in hematopoietic progenitors. Developmental regulation of human beta-gene expression in erythroid cells is mostly determined by transcriptional activators; however, it is not clear how gene-specific potentiation is set in hematopoietic progenitors. Using human and transgenic multipotent hematopoietic progenitors, we demonstrate that human beta-globin locus activation is characterized by TBP, NF-E2, CBP and BRG1 recruitment at both the Locus Control Region and human beta-gene promoter. Our results further indicate that in hematopoietic progenitors, EKLF influences chromatin organization at the human beta-globin locus and is instrumental for human beta-gene potentiation. Thus, we show that lineage-specific transcriptional activators expressed at basal levels in progenitor cells can participate in gene potentiation.

T helper type 1–specific Brg1 recruitment and remodeling of nucleosomes positioned at the IFN-γ promoter are Stat4 dependent

Transcriptional competence of the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) locus is enhanced as Th1 effectors develop from naive CD4 T lymphocytes; conversely, this gene is repressed during Th2 differentiation. We now show that the Switch (Swi)–sucrose nonfermenter (SNF) component Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1) is recruited, and positioned nucleosomes are remodeled, in a Th1-specific manner that is dependent on the transcription factor Stat4 and calcineurin phosphatase activity. Interference with specific components of mammalian Swi–SNF complexes decreased CD4 T cell differentiation into IFN-γ–positive Th1 cells. These findings reveal a collaborative mechanism of IFN-γ gene regulation during Th1 differentiation and suggest that a Th1-specific chromatin structure is created by early recruitment of Swi–SNF complexes and nucleosome remodeling dependent on Stat4 and calcineurin activation.

Implication of BRG1 and cdk9 in the STAT3-mediated activation of the p21waf1 gene.

STAT transcription factors (signal transducers and activators of transcription) are cytoplasmic proteins that induce gene activation in response to cytokine receptor stimulation. Following tyrosine phosphorylation, STAT proteins translocate into the nucleus and activate specific target genes. We have previously reported that STAT3 activates the expression of the p21waf1 gene through its association with the NcoA/SRC1a and CBP coactivators. In this study, we explore the role of BRG1, a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, and the role of cdk9, a component of the elongation factor P-TEFb, in the STAT3-mediated expression of p21waf1. We found using pull-down experiments and co-immunoprecipitation assays that both proteins associate with STAT3. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments indicate that STAT3 DNA binding results in histone H3 acetylation and BRG1 recruitment. Using Southern blot analysis, we found that the loading of BRG1 is followed by an increased accessibility of the proximal p21waf1 promoter and by the association of RNA polymerase II. As a next step, STAT3 then recruits the cdk9 kinase to phosphorylate the carboxy-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase at serine 2. Accordingly, the elongating form of the polymerase can be detected by ChIP experiments on the coding region of the gene, probably initiating mRNA synthesis. Therefore, STAT3 not only promotes the initiation of transcription but also regulates chromatin remodeling and transcription elongation through its interaction with BRG1 and cdk9.

BRG1/BRM and prohibitin are required for growth suppression by estrogen antagonists.

Estrogen antagonists are universally employed in the breast cancer therapy, although antagonist therapy is limited by the inevitable development of cellular resistance. The molecular mechanisms by which these agents inhibit cellular proliferation in breast cancer cells are not fully defined. Recent studies have shown the involvement of the E2F pathway in tamoxifen-induced growth arrest. We show that an E2F repressor, prohibitin, and the chromatin modifiers Brg1/Brm are required for estrogen antagonist-mediated growth suppression through the estrogen receptor, and that their recruitment to native promoter-bound E2F is induced via a JNK1 pathway. In addition, we demonstrate major mechanistic differences among the signaling pathways initiated by estrogen, estrogen deprivation, and estrogen antagonists. Collectively, these findings suggest that the prohibitin/Brg1/Brm node is a major cellular target for estrogen antagonists, and thereby also implicate prohibitin/Brg1/Brm as potentially important targets for breast cancer therapy.

Recruitment of SWI/SNF to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Promoter

Following human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integration into the host cell's genome, the 5' long terminal repeat (LTR) is packaged into a highly specific chromatin structure comprised of an array of nucleosomes positioned with respect to important DNA sequence elements that regulate the transcriptional activity of the provirus. While several host cell factors have been shown to be important for chromatin remodeling and/or basal transcription, no specific mechanism that relieves the transcriptional repression imposed by nuc-1, a positioned nucleosome that impedes the start site of transcription, has been found. Since phorbol esters cause the rapid disruption of nuc-1 and markedly stimulate HIV-1 transcription, we looked for protein factors that associate with this region of the HIV-1 promoter in a phorbol-ester-dependent manner. We report here that ATF-3, JunB, and BRG-1 (the ATPase subunit of the 2-MDa human chromatin remodeling machine SWI/SNF) are recruited to the 3' boundary of nuc-1 following phorbol myristate acetate stimulation in Jurkat T cells. Analysis of the recruitment of BRG-1 in nuclear extracts prepared from Jurkat T cells and reconstitution of an in vitro system with purified components demonstrate that ATF-3 is responsible for targeting human SWI/SNF (hSWI/SNF) to the HIV-1 promoter. Importantly, this recruitment of hSWI/SNF required HMGA1 proteins. Further support for this conclusion comes from immunoprecipitation experiments showing that BRG-1 and ATF-3 can exist together in the same complex. Although ATF-3 clearly plays a role in the specific targeting of BRG-1 to the HIV-1 promoter, the maintenance of a stable association between BRG-1 and chromatin appears to be dependent upon histone acetylation. By adding BRG-1 back into a BRG-1-deficient cell line (C33A cells), we demonstrate that trichostatin A strongly induces the 5'-LTR-driven reporter transcription in a manner that is dependent upon BRG-1 recruitment.

Functional Involvement of the Brahma/SWI2-related Gene 1 Protein in Cytochrome P4501A1 Transcription Mediated by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex

Chromatin remodeling is a key step in overcoming the nucleosomal repression of active transcription in eukaryotes. The mammalian SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes contain multiple subunits. The ATPase activities in these complexes are attributable to either BRG-1 or the related Brahma protein. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), after binding xenobiotic ligands such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), associates with the AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT), and the dimer so formed activates transcription of several genes, including the cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) gene. We show that BRG-1 potentiates AHR/ARNT-mediated reporter gene activity in a TCDD-dependent fashion in Hepa1c1c7 cells. Introduction of BRG-1 into the BRG-1- and hBrm-deficient SW13 and C33A human cell lines also enhances expression from a transiently transfected AHR/ARNT-dependent reporter gene. Replenishment of BRG-1 to SW13 cells also restores endogenous cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) gene expression, whereas an ATPase-deficient mutant of BRG-1 is unable to do so. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that BRG-1 associates with the enhancer region of the mouse CYP1A1 gene in vivo in a TCDD- and ARNT-dependent fashion, suggesting the specific recruitment of BRG-1 by AHR/ARNT. Finally, we demonstrate that the glutamine-rich subdomain of the transcriptional activation domain of AHR can interact with BRG-1. Together these studies reveal a functional involvement of BRG-1 in activating CYP1A1 gene transcription and implicate the importance of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activity on inducible gene expression mediated by AHR/ARNT.