Initiation Of Recombination Research Articles

CDK contribution to DSB formation and recombination in fission yeast meiosis.

CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases) associate with different cyclins to form different CDK-complexes that are fundamental for an ordered cell cycle progression, and the coordination of this progression with different aspects of the cellular physiology. During meiosis programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate recombination that in addition to generating genetic variability are essential for the reductional chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division, and therefore for genome stability and viability of the gametes. However, how meiotic progression and DSB formation are coordinated, and the role CDKs have in the process, is not well understood. We have used single and double cyclin deletion mutants, and chemical inhibition of global CDK activity using the cdc2-asM17 allele, to address the requirement of CDK activity for DSB formation and recombination in fission yeast. We report that several cyclins (Cig1, Cig2, and the meiosis-specific Crs1) control DSB formation and recombination, with a major contribution of Crs1. Moreover, complementation analysis indicates specificity at least for this cyclin, suggesting that different CDK complexes might act in different pathways to promote recombination. Down-regulation of CDK activity impinges on the formation of linear elements (LinEs, protein complexes required for break formation at most DSB hotspot sites). This defect correlates with a reduction in the capability of one structural component (Rec25) to bind chromatin, suggesting a molecular mechanism by which CDK controls break formation. However, reduction in DSB formation in cyclin deletion mutants does not always correspondingly correlate with a proportional reduction in meiotic recombination (crossovers), suggesting that specific CDK complexes might also control downstream events balancing repair pathways. Therefore, our work points to CDK regulation of DSB formation as a key conserved feature in the initiation of meiotic recombination, in addition to provide a view of possible roles CDK might have in other steps of the recombination process.

Where to Cross Over? Defining Crossover Sites in Plants.

It is believed that recombination in meiosis serves to reshuffle genetic material from both parents to increase genetic variation in the progeny. At the same time, the number of crossovers is usually kept at a very low level. As a consequence, many organisms need to make the best possible use from the one or two crossovers that occur per chromosome in meiosis. From this perspective, the decision of where to allocate rare crossover events becomes an important issue, especially in self-pollinating plant species, which experience limited variation due to inbreeding. However, the freedom in crossover allocation is significantly limited by other, genetic and non-genetic factors, including chromatin structure. Here we summarize recent progress in our understanding of those processes with a special emphasis on plant genomes. First, we focus on factors which influence the distribution of recombination initiation sites and discuss their effects at both, the single hotspot level and at the chromosome scale. We also briefly explain the aspects of hotspot evolution and their regulation. Next, we analyze how recombination initiation sites translate into the development of crossovers and their location. Moreover, we provide an overview of the sequence polymorphism impact on crossover formation and chromosomal distribution.

An equivariant Bayesian convolutional network predicts recombination hotspots and accurately resolves binding motifs.

MotivationConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been tremendously successful in many contexts, particularly where training data are abundant and signal-to-noise ratios are large. However, when predicting noisily observed phenotypes from DNA sequence, each training instance is only weakly informative, and the amount of training data is often fundamentally limited, emphasizing the need for methods that make optimal use of training data and any structure inherent in the process.ResultsHere we show how to combine equivariant networks, a general mathematical framework for handling exact symmetries in CNNs, with Bayesian dropout, a version of Monte Carlo dropout suggested by a reinterpretation of dropout as a variational Bayesian approximation, to develop a model that exhibits exact reverse-complement symmetry and is more resistant to overtraining. We find that this model combines improved prediction consistency with better predictive accuracy compared to standard CNN implementations and state-of-art motif finders. We use our network to predict recombination hotspots from sequence, and identify binding motifs for the recombination–initiation protein PRDM9 previously unobserved in this data, which were recently validated by high-resolution assays. The network achieves a predictive accuracy comparable to that attainable by a direct assay of the H3K4me3 histone mark, a proxy for PRDM9 binding.Availability and implementation https://github.com/luntergroup/EquivariantNetworks Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Hotspots for Initiation of Meiotic Recombination.

Homologous chromosomes must pair and recombine to ensure faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis, a specialized type of cell division that occurs in sexually reproducing eukaryotes. Meiotic recombination initiates by programmed induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the conserved type II topoisomerase-like enzyme SPO11. A subset of meiotic DSBs are resolved as crossovers, whereby reciprocal exchange of DNA occurs between homologous chromosomes. Importantly, DSBs are non-randomly distributed along eukaryotic chromosomes, forming preferentially in permissive regions known as hotspots. In many species, including plants, DSB hotspots are located within nucleosome-depleted regions. DSB localization is governed by interconnected factors, including cis-regulatory elements, transcription factor binding, and chromatin accessibility, as well as by higher-order chromosome architecture. The spatiotemporal control of DSB formation occurs within a specialized chromosomal structure characterized by sister chromatids organized into linear arrays of chromatin loops that are anchored to a proteinaceous axis. Although SPO11 and its partner proteins required for DSB formation are bound to the axis, DSBs occur preferentially within the chromatin loops, which supports the “tethered-loop/axis model” for meiotic recombination. In this mini review, we discuss insights gained from recent efforts to define and profile DSB hotspots at high resolution in eukaryotic genomes. These advances are deepening our understanding of how meiotic recombination shapes genetic diversity and genome evolution in diverse species.

Extensive sex differences at the initiation of genetic recombination.

Meiotic recombination differs between males and females; however, when and how these differences are established is unknown. Here we identify extensive sex differences at recombination initiation by mapping hotspots of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks in male and female mice. Contrary to past findings in humans, few hotspots are used uniquely in either sex. Instead, grossly different recombination landscapes result from up to 15-fold differences in hotspot usage between males and females. Indeed, most recombination occurs at sex-biased hotspots. Sex-biased hotspots appear to be partly determined by chromosome structure, and DNA methylation, absent in females at the onset of meiosis, plays a substantial role. Sex differences are also evident later in meiosis as the repair frequency of distal meiotic breaks as crossovers diverges in males and females. Suppression of distal crossovers may help to minimize age-related aneuploidy that arises due to cohesion loss during dictyate arrest in females.

Nuclear dynamics of the Set1C subunit Spp1 prepares meiotic recombination sites for break formation.

Spp1 is the H3K4me3 reader subunit of the Set1 complex (COMPASS/Set1C) that contributes to the mechanism by which meiotic DNA break sites are mechanistically selected. We previously proposed a model in which Spp1 interacts with H3K4me3 and the chromosome axis protein Mer2 that leads to DSB formation. Here we show that spatial interactions of Spp1 and Mer2 occur independently of Set1C. Spp1 exhibits dynamic chromatin binding features during meiosis, with many de novo appearing and disappearing binding sites. Spp1 chromatin binding dynamics depends on its PHD finger and Mer2-interacting domain and on modifiable histone residues (H3R2/K4). Remarkably, association of Spp1 with Mer2 axial sites reduces the effective turnover rate and diffusion coefficient of Spp1 upon chromatin binding, compared with other Set1C subunits. Our results indicate that "chromosomal turnover rate" is a major molecular determinant of Spp1 function in the framework of meiotic chromatin structure that prepares recombination initiation sites for break formation.

Identification of ASYNAPTIC4, a Component of the Meiotic Chromosome Axis.

During the leptotene stage of prophase I of meiosis, chromatids become organized into a linear looped array via a protein axis that forms along the loop bases. Establishment of the axis is essential for the subsequent synapsis of the homologous chromosome pairs and the progression of recombination to form genetic crossovers. Here, we describe ASYNAPTIC4 (ASY4), a meiotic axis protein in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ASY4 is a small coiled-coil protein that exhibits limited sequence similarity with the carboxyl-terminal region of the axis protein ASY3. We used enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-tagged ASY4 to show that ASY4 localizes to the chromosome axis throughout prophase I. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation revealed that ASY4 interacts with ASY1 and ASY3, and yeast two-hybrid analysis confirmed a direct interaction between ASY4 and ASY3. Mutants lacking full-length ASY4 exhibited defective axis formation and were unable to complete synapsis. Although the initiation of recombination appeared to be unaffected in the asy4 mutant, the number of crossovers was reduced significantly, and crossovers tended to group in the distal parts of the chromosomes. We conclude that ASY4 is required for normal axis and crossover formation. Furthermore, our data suggest that ASY3/ASY4 are the functional homologs of the mammalian SYCP2/SYCP3 axial components.

Initiation of homologous recombination at DNA nicks

Discontinuities in only a single strand of the DNA duplex occur frequently, as a result of DNA damage or as intermediates in essential nuclear processes and DNA repair. Nicks are the simplest of these lesions: they carry clean ends bearing 3′-hydroxyl groups that can undergo ligation or prime new DNA synthesis. In contrast, single-strand breaks also interrupt only one DNA strand, but they carry damaged ends that require clean-up before subsequent steps in repair. Despite their apparent simplicity, nicks can have significant consequences for genome stability. The availability of enzymes that can introduce a nick almost anywhere in a large genome now makes it possible to systematically analyze repair of nicks. Recent experiments demonstrate that nicks can initiate recombination via pathways distinct from those active at double-strand breaks (DSBs). Recombination at targeted DNA nicks can be very efficient, and because nicks are intrinsically less mutagenic than DSBs, nick-initiated gene correction is useful for genome engineering and gene therapy. This review revisits some physiological examples of recombination at nicks, and outlines experiments that have demonstrated that nicks initiate homology-directed repair by distinctive pathways, emphasizing research that has contributed to our current mechanistic understanding of recombination at nicks in mammalian cells.

Interrogating the Functions of PRDM9 Domains in Meiosis.

Homologous recombination is required for proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. It occurs predominantly at recombination hotspots that are defined by the DNA binding specificity of the PRDM9 protein. PRDM9 contains three conserved domains typically involved in regulation of transcription; yet, the role of PRDM9 in gene expression control is not clear. Here, we analyze the germline transcriptome of Prdm9−/− male mice in comparison to Prdm9+/+ males and find no apparent differences in the mRNA and miRNA profiles. We further explore the role of PRDM9 in meiosis by analyzing the effect of the KRAB, SSXRD, and post-SET zinc finger deletions in a cell culture expression system and the KRAB domain deletion in mice. We found that although the post-SET zinc finger and the KRAB domains are not essential for the methyltransferase activity of PRDM9 in cell culture, the KRAB domain mutant mice show only residual PRDM9 methyltransferase activity and undergo meiotic arrest. In aggregate, our data indicate that domains typically involved in regulation of gene expression do not serve that role in PRDM9, but are likely involved in setting the proper chromatin environment for initiation and completion of homologous recombination.

Scraping the tip of Zip1's role in meiotic chromosome dynamics: Using lacO/LacI Corecruitment to identify crossover promoting factors that interface with the N‐terminus of a synaptonemal complex protein

During the first division of meiosis, diploid nuclei divide to produce nuclei with only one set of chromosomes. Accurate chromosome segregation during this so‐called “reductional” division relies on the prior establishment of recombination‐based associations between homologous chromosomes (homologs). Typically, homolog pairing and interhomolog recombination take place in conjunction with the assembly of a conserved tripartite chromosomal structure, the Synaptonemal Complex (SC), and interhomolog crossover recombination intermediates are processed within the physical context of SC. However, the molecular underpinnings of the relationship between SC and meiotic recombination remain obscure. The SC is assembled by rod‐like transverse filament proteins that bridge aligned homolog axes; transverse filaments interface with a central element substructure at the midline of the SC. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a major component of the SC transverse filament is the coiled‐coil protein, Zip1. Our prior work found that small, adjacent regions within Zip1's N terminus act to independently promote crossover recombination and SC assembly, and that versions of Zip1 missing residues 2–9 or 10–14 support SC assembly but not SC‐associated crossover formation. Mutants expressing zip1‐[Δ2–9] and zip1‐[Δ10–14] alleles assemble SC, but form remarkably large Zip1 polycomplex structures and display hyper‐SUMOylation of another SC protein, Ecm11, two relatively unusual meiotic phenotypes that are also observed in meiotic cells missing the crossover‐promoting factor, Zip3. These observations suggest that residues 2–14 of Zip1 somehow affect Zip3 behavior. Zip1 has previously been found to be essential for the recruitment of Zip3 protein to sites of recombination initiation on meiotic chromosomes, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Zip3 fails to localize to all surveyed meiotic recombination initiation sites in zip1‐D1[Δ2–9] and zip1‐D2[Δ10–14] mutants, suggesting that the crossover defect exhibited by these mutants is based at least in part on the inability of the Zip1[Δ2–9] or Zip1[Δ10–14] proteins to recruit Zip3 to recombination initiation sites. Furthermore, cytological analysis indicated that Zip3 is excluded from the polycomplex structures assembled by Zip1‐[Δ2–9] or Zip1‐[Δ10–14] protein, suggesting that Zip1's residues 2–14 somehow interface with Zip3. I am currently creating a lacO/LacI co‐recruitment assay to investigate whether Zip1's N‐terminus is sufficient for recruiting Zip3 to an ectopic site in meiotic nucleus. I have created diploid strains in which the Zip1's N terminal residues 1–17, 1–33, 1–171, or 1–348 are fused to the N‐terminus of GFP‐LacI and that carry lacO on chromosome IV. Using immunofluorescence on surface spread meiotic chromosomes, I will ask whether Zip3‐MYC is recruited to a chimeric Zip1‐GFP‐LacI protein bound to a lacO array positioned on chromosome IV within the meiotic nucleus. The data from this experiment will not only provide strong evidence for a direct interaction between Zip1 and Zip3, but also establish a starting point for future structure‐function studies aimed at identifying residues that are critical for, and the meiotic genes that might regulate, a putative Zip1‐Zip3 interaction.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Role of Homology and DNA Double‐Strand Breaks in Initiation of Intrachromosomal Recombination in Mammalian Cells

As part of our continuing investigations into the mechanisms of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells, we stably transfected thymidine kinase deficient mouse fibroblasts with a DNA construct, pKM1, harboring a herpes thymidine kinase (tk) gene rendered nonfunctional by insertion of an oligonucleotide containing the recognition site for endonuclease I‐SceI. We refer to this latter tk sequence as the “recipient.” The construct also contained a closely linked truncated “donor” tk sequence. The recipient and donor were positioned as direct repeats with respect to transcriptional orientation. The donor could potentially restore function to the recipient gene via recombination with the recipient, and such events could be provoked by induction of a double‐strand break (DSB) at the I‐SceI site in the recipient. Such DSB repair events were recoverable by selection for tk‐positive clones. The donor contained 33 mismatches relative to the recipient. The mismatches were clustered, forming a localized segment of DNA sequence displaying about 20% divergence relative to the recipient, and the mismatched segment was surrounded by regions of high homology. When the donor was aligned with the recipient in pKM1, the DSB site in the recipient aligned opposite the mismatched segment, allowing us to potentially capture recombinational repair events initiating between diverged sequences. Our earlier work demonstrated that mammalian cells effectively avoid recombination between 20% diverged sequences. In work presented here, we asked whether flanking regions of high homology would enable genetic exchange between highly diverged sequences or, instead, would rejection of exchange between diverged sequences remain unchanged. We found that by surrounding mismatches with high homology, suppression of recombination between diverged sequences was overcome. Strikingly, we recovered a high frequency of gene conversion tracts positioned entirely within the mismatched sequences. We infer that such events were enabled by homologous pairing interactions between sequences surrounding the site of strand invasion. Our results suggest that the search for high homology prior to recombination is not mediated by an invading DNA terminus and may actually be independent of DSB formation. Further, the homology that enabled the recovered recombination events was located at a discrete distance from the actual invading DNA terminus. In an extension of our studies, we designed two additional constructs, pCW1 and pCW2. These constructs were similar to pKM1 except the recipient sequence in each was disrupted by an 8bp XhoI linker insertion and each construct contained a I‐SceI recognition site positioned within vector sequences at a location outside of either the recipient or donor sequence. Cells transfected with constructs pCW1 and pCW2 are being used to further explore whether a chromosomal DSB can induce and/or influence the nature of genetic exchanges occurring at a discrete distance from the DSB when the genetic exchanges themselves do not directly repair the DSB. Progress addressing this latter issue is presented.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by grant MCB 1157416 from the National Science Foundation to ASW and BCW.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Resveratrol decreases Rad51 expression and sensitizes cisplatin‑resistant MCF‑7 breast cancer cells.

Resveratrol (RES), a polyphenol compound with anti‑proliferative properties, has been previously evaluated for its beneficial effects against a variety of tumour cells. The current study elucidated the means by which RES enhances the anti‑proliferative effects of cisplatin (CIS) on MCF‑7 cells, focusing on the inhibitory effects on DNA repair of double‑strand breaks (DSBs). Chemoresistant MCF‑7 cells (MCF‑7R) were generated by continuous exposure to low concentrations of CIS (10µM CIS‑IC40) during 5passages, with the IC50 value increasing ~3‑fold. Using an MTT assay, we estimated the changes in IC50 for CIS in MCF‑7, T47‑D, MDA‑MB‑231 and MCF‑7R cells in the presence of RES. The relative transcript level of Nbs‑1, Mre‑11 and Rad‑50 genes was assessed using RT‑qPCR analysis. Rad51 and H2AX [pSer139] protein expression was determined by western blot analysis. RES at 50 and 100µM significantly enhanced the anti‑proliferative effects of CIS in both MCF‑7 and MCF‑7R cells, decreasing the IC50 values for CIS to one‑tenth and one‑sixth, respectively. A total of 100µM RES decreased the relative transcript levels of homologous recombination (HR) initiation complex components and the Rad51 protein level in MCF‑7 and MCF‑7R cells. After 48h of CIS DNA damage, the levels of Rad51 protein increased, but this effect was inhibited by 100µM RES. RES also maintained serine 139phosphorylation of histone H2AX, suggesting that RES prevents the repair of DSBs. It was observed that RES exerts an antagonistic effect over CIS on the activation of Rad51 and sustained phosphorylation of H2AX. The results suggest that RES in combination with DNA damage‑based therapy has potential as a strategy to overcome resistance and provide much safer and more effective treatment for breast cancer.

Initiation of Meiotic Recombination: DNA Double Strand Breaks for Genetic Diversity

Initiation of Meiotic Recombination: DNA Double Strand Breaks for Genetic Diversity

The conserved histone variant H2A.Z illuminates meiotic recombination initiation.

Meiotic recombination ensures faithful chromosome segregation and confers genetic diversity to gametes, and thus, is a key DNA-templated reaction not only for sexual reproduction, but also evolution. This recombination is initiated by programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), which are mainly formed at recombination hotspots. As meiotic DSB formation requires multiple proteins, it is regulated by chromatin structure. In particular, DSB occurs in a higher-order chromatin architecture termed "axis-loop", in which many loops protrude from proteinaceous axis. Previous studies have suggested that assembly of this structure is dependent on chromatin binding of cohesin, which in turn recruits proteins implicated in DSB formation. However, roles of chromatin in meiotic DSB formation are not fully characterized. This review article summarizes our recent report showing that the conserved histone H2A variant H2A.Z promotes meiotic DSB formation in fission yeast. Through a series of experiments, we found that, in H2A.Z-lacking mutants, multiple proteins involved in DSB formation, but not cohesin subunits, are less associated with chromatin. Strikingly, nuclei were more compact in the absence of H2A.Z. These observations led us to propose that fission yeast H2A.Z promotes meiotic DSB formation partly through modulating chromosome architecture to enhance interaction between DSB-related proteins and cohesin-loaded chromatin. In addition, biological implications of our findings are discussed, and their relevance to DSB formation in other species as well as to other DNA-related events are also provided.

Functional fine-tuning between bacterial DNA recombination initiation and quality control systems.

Homologous recombination (HR) is crucial for the error-free repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the restart of stalled replication. However, imprecise HR can lead to genome instability, highlighting the importance of HR quality control. After DSB formation, HR proceeds via DNA end resection and recombinase loading, whereas helicase-catalyzed disruption of a subset of subsequently formed DNA invasions is thought to be essential for maintaining HR accuracy via inhibiting illegitimate (non-allelic) recombination. Here we show that in vitro characterized mechanistic aberrations of E. coli RecBCD (resection and recombinase loading) RecQ (multifunctional DNA-restructuring helicase) mutant enzyme variants, on one hand, cumulatively deteriorate cell survival under certain conditions of genomic stress. On the other hand, we find that RecBCD and RecQ defects functionally compensate each other in terms of HR accuracy. The abnormally long resection and unproductive recombinase loading activities of a mutant RecBCD complex (harboring the D1080A substitution in RecB) cause enhanced illegitimate recombination. However, this compromised HR-accuracy phenotype is suppressed in double mutant strains harboring mutant RecQ variants with abnormally enhanced helicase and inefficient invasion disruptase activities. These results frame an in vivo context for the interplay of biochemical activities leading to illegitimate recombination, and underscore its long-range genome instability effects manifest in higher eukaryotes.

The PHD finger protein Spp1 has distinct functions in the Set1 and the meiotic DSB formation complexes.

Histone H3K4 methylation is a feature of meiotic recombination hotspots shared by many organisms including plants and mammals. Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed double-strand break (DSB) formation that in budding yeast takes place in gene promoters and is promoted by histone H3K4 di/trimethylation. This histone modification is recognized by Spp1, a PHD finger containing protein that belongs to the conserved histone H3K4 methyltransferase Set1 complex. During meiosis, Spp1 binds H3K4me3 and interacts with a DSB protein, Mer2, to promote DSB formation close to gene promoters. How Set1 complex- and Mer2- related functions of Spp1 are connected is not clear. Here, combining genome-wide localization analyses, biochemical approaches and the use of separation of function mutants, we show that Spp1 is present within two distinct complexes in meiotic cells, the Set1 and the Mer2 complexes. Disrupting the Spp1-Set1 interaction mildly decreases H3K4me3 levels and does not affect meiotic recombination initiation. Conversely, the Spp1-Mer2 interaction is required for normal meiotic recombination initiation, but dispensable for Set1 complex-mediated histone H3K4 methylation. Finally, we provide evidence that Spp1 preserves normal H3K4me3 levels independently of the Set1 complex. We propose a model where Spp1 works in three ways to promote recombination initiation: first by depositing histone H3K4 methylation (Set1 complex), next by “reading” and protecting histone H3K4 methylation, and finally by making the link with the chromosome axis (Mer2-Spp1 complex). This work deciphers the precise roles of Spp1 in meiotic recombination and opens perspectives to study its functions in other organisms where H3K4me3 is also present at recombination hotspots.

Monitoring Recombination During Meiosis in Budding Yeast.

Homologous recombination is fundamental to sexual reproduction, facilitating accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first division of meiosis, and creating novel allele combinations that fuel evolution. Following initiation of meiotic recombination by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), homologous pairing and DNA strand exchange form joint molecule (JM) intermediates that are ultimately resolved into crossover and noncrossover repair products. Physical monitoring of the DNA steps of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) cultures undergoing synchronous meiosis has provided seminal insights into the molecular basis of meiotic recombination and affords a powerful tool for dissecting the molecular roles of recombination factors. This chapter describes a suit of electrophoretic and Southern hybridization techniques used to detect and quantify the DNA intermediates of meiotic recombination at recombination hotspots in budding yeast. DSBs and recombination products (crossovers and noncrossovers) are resolved using one-dimensional electrophoresis and distinguished by restriction site polymorphisms between the parental chromosomes. Psoralen cross-linking is used to stabilize branched JMs, which are resolved from linear species by native/native two-dimensional electrophoresis. Native/denaturing two-dimensional electrophoresis is employed to determine the component DNA strands of JMs and to measure the processing of DSBs. These techniques are generally applicable to any locus where the frequency of recombination is high enough to detect intermediates by Southern hybridization.

Analysis of Meiotic Double-Strand Break Initiation in Mammals.

The repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) physically tethers homologous chromosomes in meiosis to allow for accurate segregation through meiotic cell divisions. This process, known as recombination, also results in the exchange of alleles between parental chromosomes and contributes to genetic diversity. In mammals, meiotic DSBs occur predominantly in a small fraction of the genome, at sites known as hotspots. Studies of the formation and repair of meiotic DSBs in mammals are challenging, because few cells undergo meiotic DSB formation at a given time. To better understand the initiation and control of meiotic recombination in mammals, we have devised a highly sensitive method to map the sites of meiotic DSBs genome wide. Our method first isolates DNA bound to DSB repair proteins and then specifically sequences the associated single-stranded DNA. This protocol has generated the first meiotic DSB maps in several mammals and the only map of meiotic DSBs in humans.

Noncanonical meiosis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for studying the molecular bases of the homologous chromosome synapsis, crossing over, and segregation

The nematode C. elegans is a classic study object of developmental biology and genetics, which is particularly suitable for studying the molecular bases of meiosis. Developing meiocytes are located in the threadlike gonads of C. elegans in linear gradient order of the stages of meiosis, which facilitates studying the order of intracellular events during meiosis. C. elegans has polycentric chromosomes. This causes a special order of events during meiosis, and as a consequence, meiosis in C. elegance differs from canonical meiosis of most eukaryotes. In the meiotic prophase I, all chromosomes carry single protein “pairing centers.” They are responsible for joining homologous chromosomes in pairs. This initiates the formation of synaptonemal complexes (SCs). Programmed double-stranded DNA breaks appear after initiation of the SC assembly, and they give rise to meiotic recombination. The initiation of meiotic recombination after the chromosome pairing distinguishes the C. elegans meiotic pattern from those in the absolute majority of eukaryotes studied. C. elegans has strict crossing over interference, which allows for the formation of one chiasma per bivalent. In the late prophase I, the polycentric centromeres are remodeled, one of the chromosome ends acquires a cuplike kinetochore, and during two meiotic divisions, chromosomes behave as monocentric. The study of meiosis in C. elegans allows for separate investigation of synapsis and recombination of homologous chromosomes and provides material for studying the evolution of meiosis.

The histone variant H2A.Z promotes initiation of meiotic recombination in fission yeast.

Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), which are mainly formed at recombination hotspots. Meiotic DSBs require multiple proteins including the conserved protein Spo11 and its cofactors, and are influenced by chromatin structure. For example, local chromatin around hotspots directly impacts DSB formation. Moreover, DSB is proposed to occur in a higher-order chromatin architecture termed ‘axis-loop’, in which many loops protrude from cohesin-enriched axis. However, still much remains unknown about how meiotic DSBs are generated in chromatin. Here, we show that the conserved histone H2A variant H2A.Z promotes meiotic DSB formation in fission yeast. Detailed investigation revealed that H2A.Z is neither enriched around hotspots nor axis sites, and that transcript levels of DSB-promoting factors were maintained without H2A.Z. Moreover, H2A.Z appeared to be dispensable for chromatin binding of meiotic cohesin. Instead, in H2A.Z-lacking mutants, multiple proteins involved in DSB formation, such as the fission yeast Spo11 homolog and its regulators, were less associated with chromatin. Remarkably, nuclei were more compact in the absence of H2A.Z. Based on these, we propose that fission yeast H2A.Z promotes meiotic DSB formation partly through modulating chromosome architecture to enhance interaction between DSB-related proteins and cohesin-loaded chromatin.