T HIS SYMPOSIUM investigated the new frontiers in venous thromboprophylaxis facing the vascular physician as we approach the end of the 1990s. Key issues discussed included risk assessment and management of medical patients, high-risk surgery and neurosurgery patients, and the advent of desirudin, a new, highly efficacious antithrombotic agent. It is clear that venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a problem in nonsurgical patients. Indeed, the majority of deaths seen in hospitalized patients due to pulmonary embolism occur in medical patients. Professor Harenberg noted that there are no risk assessment models (RAMS) that stratify nonsurgical patients into risk groups, and there is no consensus on what thromboprophylactic measures are required for them. The limited number of protocols completed to date have examined heterogeneous patient populations and employed a range of methods to detect VTE. Dr Cohen emphasized the need for studies in specific, homogeneous medical patient groups to investigate the most appropriate prophylaxis and highlighted the MEDENOX trial. The MEDENOX (MEDical patients and ENOXaparin) study, which enrolled more than 1,100 medical patients, provides unique insight into the actual risk of VTE in heart failure, acute respiratory disease, and acute infectious disease patients, and reveals the potential benefits of treatment with once-daily enoxaparin, 20 mg or 40 mg. Despite the high efficacy of low-molecularweight heparins (LMWHs) in the prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients, the rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) observed still show that certain patients remain at additional risk of VTE. Of the new agents investigated during the 1990s the recombinant hirudin, desirudin, has been shown to provide excellent thromboprophylactic cover to orthopedic surgery patients, and is now approved within the European Union. Professor Eriksson described the clinical trial program recently completed for desirudin, which demonstrated its superior efficacy over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in high-risk orthopedic surgery patients. Professor Eriksson also pointed out that despite the high efficacy seen with the LMWH enoxaparin, desirudin offered further DVT protection, with no increased risk of bleeding. Professor Samama highlighted the importance of risk stratification in surgical patients. RAMS help predict the likelihood of VTE, but further RAMS are required, especially for the identification of patients at high risk of VTE. Additional measures including the use of novel agents may prove worthwhile in these high-risk patients. Neurosurgery carries a high risk of VTE. Limited data are currently available. Mechanical methods of thromboprophylaxis, such as graduated compression stockings, have been shown to be effective in neurosurgical patients. Although recent trials have shown that LMWHs provide safe and effective prophylaxis in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures, the incidence of VTE remains high. Dr Nurmohamed emphasized that more trials with a greater number of patients to investigate the most appropriate prophylaxis for these patients should be initiated. The optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis has been a focus of discussion for some time. Economic pressures are leading to shorter hos-
Read full abstract