Signal Sequence Recognition Research Articles

Mechanism of Polypeptide Translocation into the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Mechanism of Polypeptide Translocation into the Endoplasmic Reticulum

RAG1 Mediates Signal Sequence Recognition and Recruitment of RAG2 in V(D)J Recombination

Recent studies have demonstrated that DNA cleavage during V(D)J recombination is mediated by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. These proteins must therefore bind to the recombination signals, but the specific binding interaction has been difficult to study in vitro. Here, we use an in vivo one-hybrid DNA binding assay to demonstrate that RAG1, in the absence of RAG2, can mediate signal recognition via the nonamer, with the heptamer acting to enhance its binding. A region of RAG1 with sequence similarity to bacterial invertases is essential for DNA binding. Localization of RAG2 to the signal is dependent upon the presence of RAG1 and is substantially more efficient with a 12 bp spacer signal than with a 23 bp spacer signal.

The nascent polypeptide-associated complex modulates interactions between the signal recognition particle and the ribosome

Background: The first step in the co-translational targeting of secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane involves the recognition of signal sequences by the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) as they emerge from the ribosome. It has recently been proposed that the nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) contributes to the fidelity of targeting by modulating interactions that occur between the ribosome–nascent chain complex, the SRP and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Precisely how NAC influences SRP function is presently unclear.Results We have used immunoblotting experiments to monitor interactions between the SRP and the ribosome–nascent chain complex, in the absence and presence of NAC. In the absence of NAC, SRP binds in a high-salt-resistant manner only to ribosomes that contain a signal sequence, confirming the specificity of SRP for signal sequences. Binding of SRP to signalless ribosome nascent chains is observed at lower salt concentrations; however, the amount of SRP bound to this complex is indistinguishable from that bound to ribosomes lacking nascent chains. Thus, this salt-sensitive binding is likely to be the result of interactions between SRP and the ribosome that occur independently of the nascent chain. A minimal particle consisting of SRP54 and SRP RNA is sufficient to confer salt-resistant binding to ribosomes that contain signal sequences, whereas all of the SRP subunits are required for salt-sensitive binding to ribosomes that lack nascent chains. This salt-sensitive binding by SRP is inhibited by the addition of purified NAC.Conclusion Based on our results, we define two distinct modes of interaction between SRP and the ribosome–nascent chain complex: salt-resistant interactions between SRP54 and signal sequences, and salt-sensitive interactions between additional components of SRP and the ribosome. We conclude that NAC does not directly influence signal sequence recognition by SRP but, rather, that it negatively modulates interactions that occur between SRP and the ribosome itself. These results are discussed in terms of a model wherein SRP and NAC regulate each others’ activity during protein targeting.

A two-step recognition of signal sequences determines the translocation efficiency of proteins.

The cytosolic and secreted, N-glycosylated, forms of plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) are generated by facultative translocation. To study the molecular events that result in the bi-topological distribution of proteins, we determined in vitro the capacities of several signal sequences to bind the signal recognition particle (SRP) during targeting, and to promote vectorial transport of murine PAI-2 (mPAI-2). Interestingly, the six signal sequences we compared (mPAI-2 and three mutated derivatives thereof, ovalbumin and preprolactin) were found to have the differential activities in the two events. For example, the mPAI-2 signal sequence first binds SRP with moderate efficiency and secondly promotes the vectorial transport of only a fraction of the SRP-bound nascent chains. Our results provide evidence that the translocation efficiency of proteins can be controlled by the recognition of their signal sequences at two steps: during SRP-mediated targeting and during formation of a committed translocation complex. This second recognition may occur at several time points during the insertion/translocation step. In conclusion, signal sequences have a more complex structure than previously anticipated, allowing for multiple and independent interactions with the translocation machinery.

A posttargeting signal sequence recognition event in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

We have analyzed early phases of the cotranslational transport of the secretory protein preprolactin through the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Following recognition of the signal sequence of the nascent polypeptide chain in the cytosol by the SRP, the chain is transferred into the membrane, where a second signal sequence recognition step takes place for which the presence in the lipid bilayer of the Sec61 p complex is essential and sufficient. This step leads to a tight junction between the ribosomenascent chain complex and the Sec61p complex, and to the productive insertion of the nascent chain into the translocation site. These results show that a translocation substrate is subjected to two recognition events before being allowed to cross the ER membrane.

Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

STRUCTURE OF THE SRP AND SRP RECEPTOR . NOlllelleiatllre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SRP RNA SRP Structllre alld Assembly . SRP Proteill SlIbllllits . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SRP Receptor .

PrlA and PrlG suppressors reduce the requirement for signal sequence recognition

Selection for suppressors of defects in the signal sequence of secretory proteins has led most commonly to identification of prlA alleles and less often to identification of prlG alleles. These genes, secY/prlA and secE/prlG, encode integral membrane components of the protein translocation system of Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that an outer membrane protein, LamB, that lacks a signal sequence can be exported with reasonable efficiency in both prlA and prlG suppressor strains. Although the signal sequence is not absolutely required for export of LamB, the level of export in the absence of prl suppressor alleles is exceedingly low. Such strains are phenotypically LamB-, and functional LamB can be detected only by using sensitive infectious-center assays. Suppression of the LamB signal sequence deletion is dependent on normal components of the export pathway, indicating that suppression is not occurring through a bypass mechanism. Our results indicate that the majority of the known prlA suppressors function by an identical mechanism and, further, that the prlG suppressors work in a similar fashion. We propose that both PrlA and PrlG suppressors lack a proofreading activity that normally rejects defective precursors from the export pathway.

Signal sequence recognition and targeting of ribosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle do not require GTP.

The identification of GTP-binding sites in the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and in both the alpha and beta subunits of the SRP receptor has complicated the task of defining the step in the protein translocation reaction that is controlled by the GTP-binding site in the SRP. Ribonucleotide binding assays show that the purified SRP can bind GDP or GTP. However, crosslinking experiments show that SRP54 can recognize the signal sequence of a nascent polypeptide in the absence of GTP. Targeting of SRP-ribosome-nascent polypeptide complexes, formed in the absence of GTP, to microsomal membranes likewise proceeds normally. To separate the GTPase cycles of SRP54 and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha), we employed an SR alpha mutant that displays a markedly reduced affinity for GTP. We observed that the dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the translocation site could only occur when GTP binding to SR alpha was permitted. These data suggest that the GTP binding and hydrolysis cycles of both SRP54 and SR alpha are initiated upon formation of the SRP-SRP receptor complex.

Signal Sequence Recognition and Protein Targeting to the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

Signal Sequence Recognition and Protein Targeting to the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

PrlA suppressor mutations cluster in regions corresponding to three distinct topological domains.

The SecY protein of Escherichia coli and its homologues in other organisms, are integral components of the cellular protein translocation machinery. Suppressor mutations that alter SecY (the prlA alleles) broaden the specificity of this machinery and allow secretion of precursor proteins with defective signal sequences. Twenty-five prlA alleles have been characterized. These suppressor mutations were found to cluster in regions corresponding to three distinct topological domains of SecY. Based on the nature and position of the prlA mutations, we propose that transmembrane domain 7 of SecY functions in signal sequence recognition. Results suggest that this interaction may involve a right-handed supercoil of alpha-helices. Suppressor mutations that alter this domain appear to prevent signal sequence recognition, and this novel mechanism of suppression suggests a proofreading function for SecY. We propose that suppressor mutations that alter a second domain of SecY, transmembrane helix 10, also affect this proof-reading function, but indirectly. Based on the synthetic phenotypes exhibited by double mutants, we propose that these mutations strengthen the interaction with another component of the translocation machinery, SecE. Suppressor mutations were also found to cluster in a region corresponding to an amino-terminal periplasmic domain. Possible explanations for this unexpected finding are discussed.

GTPase domain of the 54-kD subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle is required for protein translocation but not for signal sequence binding.

The 54-kD subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP54) binds to signal sequences of nascent secretory and transmembrane proteins. SRP54 consists of two separable domains, a 33-kD amino-terminal domain that contains a GTP-binding site (SRP54G) and a 22-kD carboxy-terminal domain (SRP54M) containing binding sites for both the signal sequence and SRP RNA. To examine the function of the two domains in more detail, we have purified SRP54M and used it to assemble a partial SRP that lacks the amino-terminal domain of SRP54 [SRP(-54G)]. This particle recognized signal sequences in two independent assays, albeit less efficiently than intact SRP. Analysis of the signal sequence binding activity of free SRP54 and SRP54M supports the conclusion that SRP54M binds signal sequences with lower affinity than the intact protein. In contrast, when SRP(-54G) was assayed for its ability to promote the translocation of preprolactin across microsomal membranes, it was completely inactive, apparently because it was unable to interact normally with the SRP receptor. These results imply that SRP54G plays an essential role in SRP-mediated targeting of nascent chain-ribosome complexes to the ER membrane and also influences signal sequence recognition, possibly by promoting a tighter association between signal sequences and SRP54M.

Signal-sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex.

Hydrophobic signal-sequences direct the transfer of secretory proteins across the inner membrane of prokaryotes and the endoplasmic reticulum membranes of eukaryotes. In mammalian cells, signal-sequences are recognized by the 54K protein (M(r) 54,000) of the signal recognition particle (SRP) which is believed to hold the nascent chain in a translocation-competent conformation until it contacts the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The SRP consists of a 7S RNA and six different polypeptides. The 7S RNA and the 54K signal-sequence-binding protein (SRP54) of mammalian SRP exhibit strong sequence similarity to the 4.5S RNA and P48 protein (Ffh) of Escherichia coli which form a ribonucleoprotein particle. Depletion of 4.5S RNA or overproduction of P48 causes the accumulation of the beta-lactamase precursor, although not of other secretory proteins. Whether 4.5S RNA and P48 are part of an SRP-like complex with a role in protein export is controversial. Here we show that the P48/4.5S RNA ribonucleoprotein complex interacts specifically with the signal sequence of a nascent secretory protein and therefore is a signal recognition particle.

The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to signal sequences when they emerge from a translating ribosome and targets the complex of ribosome, nascent chain and SRP to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) allowing the co-translational translocation of the nascent chain. By photo-crosslinking it has been shown that the signal sequence of preprolactin (PPL) only interacts with the methionine-rich (M) domain of the 54 kDa protein subunit (SRP54) of SRP. Here we show that (i) a signal-anchor sequence is likewise crosslinked only to the methionine-rich domain of SRP54, (ii) free SRP54 can interact with signal sequences independently of the other components of SRP, (iii) its M domain suffices to perform this function, and (iv) an essentially intact M domain is required for signal sequence recognition. Alkylation of the N+G domain in intact SRP54 with N-ethyl maleimide (NEM), but not after cleavage with V8 protease, prevents the binding of a signal sequence to the M domain. This suggests a proximity between the N+G and M domains of SRP54 and raises the possibility that the role of the N+G domain may be to regulate the binding and/or the release of signal sequences.

Signal peptide analogs derived from two chloroplast precursors interact with the signal recognition system of the chloroplast envelope.

We have used synthetic peptides representing segments of the signal sequences of preferredoxin (pFd) and the precursor of the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (pS) to study interactions with the signal sequence recognition system at the chloroplast surface. Peptides representing the COOH-terminal 30 amino acids of the pFd and pS signal peptides were able to completely and reversibly inhibit the import of their homologous precursors into isolated chloroplasts at a 2.5 microM concentration. Import was blocked at the level of precursor binding to the chloroplast. This inhibition of precursor binding and import was not due to disruption of chloroplast integrity as incubation of isolated chloroplasts with the peptides did not cause measurable perturbation of the envelope membranes. The peptides also were able to block the import of the heterologous precursor protein, suggesting that pS and pFd share a common signal sequence recognition system. Visualization of the bound peptides at the chloroplast surface by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using antipeptide antibodies gave a marked punctate staining pattern. This pattern is consistent with the localization of chloroplast import receptor(s) at contact zones between the inner and outer envelope membranes.

Protein transport across the ER membrane

Protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane may be divided into two phases: an initiation or targeting cycle, which has been fairly well characterized, and the actual transfer of the polypeptide chain through the membrane, the mechanism of which is still unknown. In this review, the initiation cycle is discussed with emphasis on the mechanism of signal sequence recognition by the 54 kDa polypeptide of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and on the efficiency of targeting of nascent chains. Recent results are reviewed suggesting the transfer of the polypeptide chain by means of a translocation complex, a constituent of which appears to be the signal sequence receptor protein (SSR).

Reconstitution of biochemically altered nuclear pores: Transport can be eliminated and restored

Biochemically altered nuclear pores specifically lacking the N-acetylglucosamine-bearing pore proteins were constructed in a nuclear assembly extract in order to assign function to these proteins. The depleted pores do not bind nuclear signal sequences or actively import nuclear proteins, but they are functional for diffusion. These defects can be fully repaired by assembly with readded Xenopus pore glycoproteins. Strikingly, isolated rat pore glycoproteins also restore transport. Electron microscopy reveals that depleted pores have largely normal morphology. Thus, the pore glycoproteins are not required for assembly of the nuclear envelope, the major structures of the pore, or a pore diffusional channel. Instead, they are essential for active protein import and, unexpectedly, for construction of the part of the pore necessary for signal sequence recognition.

Import of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria

Although both chloroplasts and mitochondria are capable of nucleic acid and protein synthesis, their biogenesis requires the import of a large number of nuclear-encoded proteins that are synthesized on cytoplasmic ribosomes. In the case of both organelles the transfer is post-translational and energy dependent. Most of the nuclear-encoded proteins are synthesized as precursors with an amino-terminal extension known as the signal, transit or pre-sequence. Like proteins destined for the secretory pathway, targeting of nuclear-encoded chloroplast and mitochondrial proteins to the proper cellular location is mediated by these N-terminal topogenic sequences. As is the case for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum or prokaryotic plasma membrane, our data suggest dual recognition of signal sequences for protein import into mitochondria or chloroplasts; first by a soluble recognition system and then by a membrane bound one. The latter has been localised to distinct regions where the inner and outer membrane of these organelles are in close contact.The in vitro import of cytoplasmically synthesized precursors into chloroplasts has been previously described. We have transcribed mRNA from a cDNA clone coding for a cytoplasmically synthesized polypeptide of the chloroplast stroma, the small subunit of ribulose 1,5,-bisphosphate carboxylase. Translation of the specific mRNA in a wheat germ cell-free system yielded a large precursor (pS), and post-translational incubation with isolated pea chloroplasts resulted in import of pS into the chloroplast stroma accompanied by conversion of pS into the mature form (S) by means of cleavage of an NH2-terminal transit sequence. Import was an energy-dependent process and required ATP hydrolysis. Nonpenetrating ATP-consuming systems had no effect on import when chloroplasts were allowed to synthesize ATP in the stroma in the dark, suggesting that the ATP exerts its effect on import within the stroma and not in the cytosol. Studies with various ionophores demonstrated that ATP hydrolysis within the stroma was not used to generate a membrane potential across membranes.

Model for signal sequence recognition from amino-acid sequence of 54K subunit of signal recognition particle

Protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum in mammalian cells is catalysed by signal recognition particle (SRP). Cross-linking experiments have shown that the subunit of relative molecular mass 54,000 (Mr 54K; SRP54) interacts directly with signal sequences as they emerge from the ribosome. Here we present the sequence of a complementary DNA clone of SRP54 which predicts a protein that contains a putative GTP-binding domain and an unusually methionine-rich domain. The properties of this latter domain suggest that it contains the signal sequence binding site. A previously uncharacterized Escherichia coli protein has strong homology to both domains. Closely homologous GTP-binding domains are also found in the alpha-subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha, docking protein) in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and in a second E. coli protein, ftsY, which resembles SR alpha. Recent work has shown that SR alpha is a GTP-binding protein and that GTP is required for the release of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome on targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. We propose that SRP54 and SR alpha use GTP in sequential steps of the targeting reaction and that essential features of such a pathway are conserved from bacteria to mammals.

Lymphoid V(D)J recombination: nucleotide insertion at signal joints as well as coding joints.

The coding regions of antigen receptor genes assembled by variable-diversity-joining region [V(D)J] recombination are known in many cases to have undergone deletions of several nucleotides and also to contain insertions of noncoded nucleotides at the recombined junction (the coding joint). By using extrachromosomal recombination substrates to transfect lymphoid cell lines, we show that the signal joint (the fusion of the corresponding recognition signal sequences) can also contain insertions; however, nucleotide loss from the signals is very rare. The frequency of nucleotide addition varies among pre-B-cell lines in a manner proportional to their content of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase. We also find frequent nucleotide additions (and deletions) at coding joints, but in this case there is no strong correlation with the level of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase activity. Inserts at both signal and coding joints are rich in G + C, consistent with the base utilization preference of this enzyme.

Abnormal recombination of Igh D and J gene segments in transformed pre-B cells of scid mice.

Studies of Ig and TCR genes in transformed lymphocytes of scid mice have revealed aberrant DNA rearrangements. Here we present a more detailed analysis of the Igh gene recombination in nine scid pre-B cell lines transformed by Abelson murine leukemia virus. We found 85% of the rearranged Igh alleles to contain abnormal Dh-Jh deletions of varying size. All of these deletions encompassed Jh elements and extended into the Igh enhancer region, occasionally involving the switch (S) region of the C mu gene. Some of these rearrangements removed most of the Dh elements, but none appeared to extend to the Vh genes. DNA sequence analysis of the two abnormally rearranged Igh alleles in one pre-B cell line showed that no Dh or Jh coding sequences were retained at the recombination sites though heptamer-like (CACTGTG) recognition signal sequences were present in the absence of nonamer (GGTTTTTGT) recognition signal sequences. These results imply that a deregulated recombinase activity may be responsible for the abnormal Dh-Jh deletions and the absence of Vh-Dh joining in established lines of Abelson murine leukemia virus-transformed scid pre-B cells.