Recognition Of Double-stranded RNA Research Articles

RNA–protein complexes

RNA-binding proteins are an extremely diverse group of proteins, reflecting the diverse functional requirements of cellular RNAs. Whereas the number of structures of RNA-binding proteins or modules is increasing at a reasonable rate, that of protein–RNA complexes increments by only a few each year. The recently determined structure of a complex from the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle shows the subtleties of RNA stem–loop recognition by ribonucleoprotein modules. A second structure provides the first direct information on double-stranded RNA recognition by the double-stranded RNA-binding module that occurs in a variety of functionally distinct proteins. Another two new complexes concern proteins interacting with tRNA. The first is methionyl-tRNAfMet transformylase, which has to compete with elongation factor Tu for charged initiator tRNAMet and does so by recognising specific features of the acceptor stem of tRNAfMet. The second is prolyl-tRNA synthetase, complexed with its cognate tRNA, that has to specifically recognise the two guanines common to all tRNA anticodons specific for proline.

Minor-groove recognition of double-stranded RNA by the double-stranded RNA-binding domain from the RNA-activated protein kinase PKR.

The human double-stranded RNA- (dsRNA) activated protein kinase (PKR) has a dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) that contains two tandem copies of the dsRNA-binding motif (dsRBM). The minimal-length polypeptide required to bind dsRNA contains both dsRBMs, as determined by mobility-shift and filter-binding assays. Mobility-shift experiments indicate binding requires a minimum of 16 base pairs of dsRNA, while a minimal-length site for saturation of longer RNAs is 11 base pairs. Bulge defects in the helix disfavor binding, and single-stranded tails do not strongly influence the dsRNA length requirement. These polypeptides do not bind an RNA-DNA hybrid duplex or dsDNA as judged by either mobility-shift or competition experiments, suggesting 2'-OH contacts on both strands of the duplex stabilize binding. Related experiments on chimeric duplexes in which specific sets of 2'-OHs are substituted with 2'-H or 2'-OCH3 reveal that the 2'-OHs required for binding are located along the entire 11 basepair site. These results are supported by Fe(II) EDTA footprinting experiments that show protein-dependent protection of the minor groove of dsRNA. The dependence of dsRNA-protein binding on salt concentration suggests that only one ionic contact is made between the protein and dsRNA phosphate backbone and that at physiological salt concentrations 90% of the free energy of binding is nonelectrostatic. Thus, the specificity of PKR for dsRNA over RNA-DNA hybrids and dsDNA is largely due to molecular recognition of a network of 2'-OHs involving both strands of dsRNA and present along the entire 11 base-pair site.