SINCE THE MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY, BY MY OWN informal counting, at least eleven African-American women anthropologists have carried out their doctoral research in Jamaica. Included on this list are Zora Neale Hurston, Katherine Dunham, Ida Tafari, Victoria Durant-Gonzalez, Faith Mitchell, Faye Harrison, Deborah A. Thomas, Gina Athene Ulysse, Bianca Williams, Lisa Anderson-Levy, as well as myself. What brings African-American women anthropologists to Jamaica?The reason for my focus on women anthropologists conducting research in has two parts. First, this is an aspect of my ongoing project, Face and Voice of Black Women Anthropologists'',1 an intellectual biography that historicises and focuses on theory building, recognition and respect or lack thereof garnered by the women who face barriers of racism and sexism in the academy and in the larger society of the United States; in that larger project I ask, what brings US black women to anthropology, this esoteric discipline, often demonised for its imperialist origins but the most scientific of the humanities and most humanistic of the social sciences? Second, included in the discussion of women anthropologists carrying out research in is the double-edged sword of public scrutiny, as they are gendered foreigners regardless of a shared phenotype. African-American anthropologist Brackette Williams reminds us that all my skinfolk ain't kinfolk as a way of expressing differences of class, nationality, gender, regardless of similar phenotype.2 What brings these researchers to a place such as Jamaica, I argue, is the development of an African diaspora knowledge and a mutual understanding of reciprocity, respect and responsibility that serves as a shared bridge across African diasporan cultures.Anthropological research utilises emic and etic methodologies. Conrad Kottak offers this definition of those processes and perspectives:The emic approach investigates how local people think. How they perceive and categorise the world, their rules for behaviour, what has meaning for them, and how they imagine and explain things . . . The etic scientist-oriented approach shifts the focus from local observations, categories, explanations, and interpretations to those of the anthropologist. The etic approach realises that members of a culture often are too involved in what they are doing to interpret their cultures impartially. When using the etic approach the ethnographer emphasises what he or she considers important.3According to African-American anthropologist Lee Baker, there is a history of where one carries out this emic and etic research, and the reasons for it are part of the lore, lure, controversies and benefits of anthropology.4A major rite of passage in the field of anthropology is to conduct fieldwork in a place not of your own location to assure impartiality, fresh eyes from an emic or etic perspective. For African-Americans there is an additional political position that underscores this intellectual challenge. First, there is the action of heeding Marcus Garvey's words of'Africa here and abroad, meaning that wherever peoples of African descent are found there is Africa and an affinity in common oppression and history. Second, there is the issue of grappling with the never-ending misrepresentation of peoples of Africa and of the African diaspora by a variety of hegemonic forces. So do the people of the land of wood and water satisfy this academic ritual? What brings anthropologists to that location to pursue this essential element of their studies and career? Is it because of Jamaica's physical or demographic size? Is that preference accorded to by its dominance in the old British colonial order, or by family ties? Through reading of selected texts - ethnography, articles and reports written by the women being considered here - I try to answer the why Jamaica question, but more importantly, in doing so I ask: what kind of research did they do; how did they manage daily living; what did they learn? …