Outcomes In Recipients Research Articles

Evolving Trends and Impact of Waitlist Transfusion on Recipient Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation.

This study evaluates the clinical trends, risk factors, and impact of waitlist blood transfusion on outcomes following isolated heart transplantation. The UNOS registry was queried to identify adult recipients from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2022. The recipients were stratified into two groups depending on whether they received a blood transfusion while on the waitlist. The incidence of waitlist transfusion was compared before and after the 2018 allocation policy change. The primary outcome was survival. Propensity score-matching was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of waitlist transfusion. A sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of waitlist time on waitlist transfusion. From the 21 926 recipients analyzed in this study, 4201 (19.2%) received waitlist transfusion. The incidence of waitlist transfusion was lower following the allocation policy change (14.3%vs. 23.7%, p < 0.001). The recipients with waitlist transfusion had significantly reduced 1-year posttransplant survival (88.8%vs. 91.9%, p < 0.001) compared to the recipients without waitlist transfusion in an unmatched comparison. However, in a propensity score-matched comparison, the two groups had similar 1-year survival (90.0%vs. 90.4%, p=0.656). Multivariable analysis identified ECMO, Impella, and pretransplant dialysis as strong predictors of waitlist transfusion. In a sub-analysis, the odds of waitlist transfusion increased nonlinearly with longer waitlist time. There is a lower incidence of waitlist transfusion among transplant recipients under the 2018 allocation system. Waitlist transfusion is not an independent predictor of adverse posttransplant outcomes but rather a marker of the patient's clinical condition. ECMO, Impella, and pretransplant dialysis are strong predictors of waitlist transfusion.

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Transplant recipients experience high rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, contemporary estimates of the association between solid organ transplantation and adverse pregnancy outcomes are lacking. To evaluate the association between solid organ transplantation and adverse pregnancy outcomes and to quantify the incidence of allograft rejection and allograft loss during pregnancy. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to June 20, 2024, and reference lists were manually reviewed. Cohort and case-control studies that reported at least 1 adverse pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with solid organ transplantation vs without solid organ transplant or studies that reported allograft outcomes in pregnant women with solid organ transplantation were included following independent dual review of abstracts and full-text articles. Two investigators abstracted data and independently appraised risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall pooled estimates using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Reporting followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Primary pregnancy outcomes were preeclampsia, preterm birth (<37 weeks), and low birth weight (<2500 g). Secondary pregnancy outcomes were live birth rate, gestation, very preterm birth (<32 weeks), very low birth weight (<1500 g), and cesarean delivery. Allograft outcomes were allograft loss and rejection during pregnancy. Data from 22 studies and 93 565 343 pregnancies (4786 pregnancies in solid organ transplant recipients) were included; 14 studies reported adverse pregnancy outcomes, and 13 studies provided data for allograft outcomes. Pregnancies in organ transplant recipients were associated with significantly increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.83 [95% CI, 3.45-9.87]; I2 = 77.4%), preterm birth (aOR, 6.65 [95% CI, 4.09-12.83]; I2 = 81.8%), and low birth weight (aOR, 6.51 [95% CI, 2.85-14.88]; I2 = 90.6%). The incidence of acute allograft rejection was 2.39% (95% CI, 1.20%-3.96%; I2 = 68.5%), and the incidence of allograft loss during pregnancy was 1.55% (95% CI, 0.05%-4.44%; I2 = 69.2%). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, pregnancies in recipients of a solid organ transplant were associated with a 4 to 6 times increased risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and low birth weight during pregnancy. There was a low overall risk of graft rejection or loss during pregnancy.

UGT1A1*28 polymorphism and the risk of toxicity and disease progression in patients with breast cancer receiving sacituzumab govitecan.

Sacituzumab govitecan (sacituzumab) emerged as an important agent in metastatic and locally recurrent HER2-negative breast cancer treatment. UGT1A1 polymorphisms have also been shown to predict sacituzumab toxicity. In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the associations between UGT1A1 status, toxicity, and therapeutic outcomes in sacituzumab recipients with advanced breast cancer who underwent genotype testing for UGT1A1 alleles (N = 68). We found 17 (25%) of our patients to be homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and 24 (35.3%) were heterozygous. Of seven African American patients with triple-negative breast cancer, five were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and two were heterozygous. Patients with a homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype were significantly more likely to have treatment terminated because of adverse effects. However, the polymorphism was not associated with treatment discontinuation because of disease progression. This retrospective, real-world analysis suggests potential clinical utility in UGT1A1 testing for patients receiving sacituzumab, but future trials are needed to confirm the association between genotypes and treatment outcomes.

Contemporary Immunosuppression Management and 1-Year Outcomes in Dual Organ Heart Transplantation.

There have been limited reports on immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant populations, primarily from before the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change. Recent data suggested that outcomes with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants remained comparable in the new allocation era, yet heart-kidney recipients have worse 1-year survival. This single-center retrospective study evaluated adult heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-lung transplant recipients from September 2019 to May 2023. Immunosuppression regimen, infectious complications, and graft outcomes were collected for 12 months. A total of 36 patients (kidney n = 20, liver n = 9, and lung n = 7) were included in this study. Basiliximab was the most commonly employed induction strategy across the organ groups (12/20 in kidney, 4/9 in liver, and 7/7 in lung). All patients were on triple immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant with prednisone wean achieved in one heart-liver recipient. Infection complications were frequently reported (95% kidney, 75% liver, 100% lung group). One patient went back to dialysis due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. One chronic lung allograft dysfunction was reported, but no other severe biopsy-proven rejection or retransplant was reported. The 1-year survival was 85% (17/20) in heart-kidney, 78% (7/9) in heart-liver, and 86% (6/7) in heart-lung recipients. This study summarized real-world immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant recipients.

COVID-19 seropositive donors yield comparable post-lung transplant outcomes.

Recent reports have suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can cause pneumonitis even in the absence of clinical symptoms and COVID-19 associated pulmonary inflammation can persist resulting in long-term fibrosis. This single-center study utilized standardized immunological testing to determine whether lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, indicative of past COVID-19 infection, can be safely used for clinical transplantation. The study included 90 consecutive lung transplant procedures incorporating donor serological testing for past COVID-19 infection. Donors were negative for active COVID-19 infection and met institutional criteria to be used for lung transplantation. The outcomes of lung transplant recipients were compared between donors with and without serological evidence of past COVID-19 infection. No significant difference was found in post-transplant survival rates between recipients of lungs obtained from donors with serological evidence compared to those without. Additionally, there were no significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 rates or other post-transplant clinical parameters, such as operative time, ischemic time, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. Our findings suggest that lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, but not active COVID-19 infection are safe and feasible for transplantation, yielding comparable post-transplant outcomes to donors who are negative COVID-19 antibodies. This study supports the utilization of lungs from donors with historic COVID-19 infection as long as they meet current transplant criteria, potentially addressing the concerns related to the use of such organs.

Expanding the Donor Pool to the Ultimate Level: Introducing the Revolutionary Hybrid Dual Graft Liver Transplant Using Domino and Living Donors.

Innovative solutions are crucial as the demand for liver transplants continues to outpace available grafts. Dual graft liver transplantation offers a promising avenue to address graft volume challenges while minimizing donor risks. This report introduces a groundbreaking approach, combining a full organ domino donor graft with a living donor graft for a hybrid dual graft liver transplant. A 2-y-old child with Maple syrup urine disease and a 40-y-old adult with end-stage liver disease became the focus of this unique case. A hybrid dual graft liver transplant was executed, uniting the domino donor's full organ graft with a living donor's left lateral segment. Precise vascular and biliary reconstructions facilitated a successful transplant. The hybrid dual graft liver transplant, merging domino donor and living donor grafts, presents a viable strategy to combat graft shortages, particularly in regions predominantly reliant on living donor transplants. Despite challenges, this pioneering approach should be embraced by established liver transplant centers because it enables concurrent living donor liver transplantation while prioritizing donor safety and recipient outcomes.

Consensus Statement: Technical Standards for Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion

BackgroundThoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a powerful technique for optimizing organ procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. Despite its rapid adoption, standardized guidelines for TA-NRP implementation are lacking, prompting the need for consensus recommendations to ensure safe and effective utilization of this technique. MethodsA working group composed of members from The American Society of Transplant Surgeons, The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery was convened to develop technical guidelines for TA-NRP. The group systematically reviewed existing literature, consensus statements, and expert opinions to identify key areas requiring standardization, including predonation evaluation, intraoperative management, postdonation procedures, and future research directions. ResultsThe working group formulated recommendations encompassing donor evaluation and selection criteria, premortem testing and therapeutic interventions, communication protocols, and procedural guidelines for TA-NRP implementation. These recommendations aim to facilitate coordination among transplant teams, minimize variability in practice, and promote transparency and accountability throughout the TA-NRP process. ConclusionsThe consensus guidelines presented herein serve as a comprehensive framework for the successful and ethical implementation of TA-NRP programs in organ procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. By providing standardized recommendations and addressing areas of uncertainty, these guidelines aim to enhance the quality, safety, and efficiency of TA-NRP procedures, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes for transplant recipients.

Organ Utilization From Donors Following Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review of Graft and Recipient Outcome.

The global shortage of solid organs for transplantation is exacerbated by high demand, resulting in organ deficits and steadily growing waiting lists. Diverse strategies have been established to address this issue and enhance organ availability, including the use of organs from individuals who have undergone extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). The main aim of this work was to examine the outcomes for both graft and recipients of solid organ transplantations sourced from donors who underwent eCPR. We performed a systematic literature review using a combination of the terms related to extracorporeal life support and organ donation. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched up to February 2024. From 1764 considered publications, 13 studies comprising 130 donors and 322 organ donations were finally analyzed. On average, included patients were 36 y old, and the extracorporeal life support was used for 4 d. Kidneys were the most often transplanted organs (68%; 220/322), followed by liver (22%; 72/322) and heart (5%; 15/322); with a very good short-term graft survival rate (95% for kidneys, 92% for lungs, 88% for liver, and 73% for heart). Four studies with 230 grafts reported functional outcomes at the 1-y follow-up, with graft losses reported for 4 hearts (36%), 8 livers (17%), and 7 kidneys (4%). Following eCPR, organs can be successfully used with very high graft and recipient survival. In terms of meeting demand, the use of organs from patients after eCPR might be a suitable method for expanding the organ donation pool.

The Effects of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplantation: Evidence From Tissue Pathology.

The biological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplanted kidneys are uncertain with little pathological information. This single-center, prospective observational study evaluated kidney transplant biopsies from recipients of deceased donors with COVID-19, current recipients contracting SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in 2022, against prior BK virus (BKV) infection and uninfected (without SARS-CoV-2 or BKV) samples, as respective positive and negative comparators (n = 503 samples). We demonstrated nonvirus tubular injury in implanted tissue from infected donors and prevalent recipients with mild acute COVID-19 and acute kidney injury, excluding direct viral infection as a cause of kidney damage. COVID particles were absent in 4116 ultrastructural images of 295 renal tubules from 4 patients with acute COVID-19. No viral cytopathic effect, viral allograft nephropathy, or SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in acute tissues, nor in 128 sequential samples from infected donors or recipients with COVID-19. Following recipient COVID-19 (mean 16.8 ± 12.0 wk post-infection), the biopsy-prevalence of rejection was 33.0% (n = 100 biopsies) versus 13.4% for contemporaneous uninfected controls (n = 337; P < 0.001). Prior COVID-19 was an independent risk factor for incident rejection using multivariable generalized estimating equation adjusted for competing risks (odds ratio, 2.195; 95% confidence interval, 1.189-4.052; P = 0.012). Landmark and matched-pair analyses confirmed an association of SARS-CoV-2 with subsequent transplant rejection, with a similar pattern following BKV infection. Transplantation from COVID-19+ deceased donors yielded good recipient outcomes without evidence of viral tissue transmission. Acute kidney injury during COVID-19 was mediated by archetypical tubular injury and infection correlated with an increased risk of subsequent rejection.

Robotic Living Donor Hysterectomy for Uterus Transplantation: An Update on Donor and Recipient Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Uterus transplantation (UTx) has evolved into a clinical reality for women with absolute uterine infertility. The international experience with UTx has predominantly utilized living donor grafts-and strategies to minimize harm to donors remain paramount. Robotic living donor hysterectomy represents a minimally invasive approach to facilitate rapid donor recovery, improve pelvic visualization and operative access, and maintain UTx recipient outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe donor, recipient, graft, and pregnancy outcomes after adoption of a robotic living donor hysterectomy program. Methods: The Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS) incorporated a robotic living donor hysterectomy operative protocol, including transvaginal extraction, from April 2019. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, and a case series presented, to describe donor intra- and post-operative outcomes and recipient intra-operative outcomes, graft viability, established pregnancies, and live births. Early cases were compared to later cases to better describe the learning curve associated with the technique. Results: Sixteen robotic living donor hysterectomies were performed with 100% graft viability after implantation demonstrated by myometrial flow and onset of menses. Early experience (eight cases) demonstrated two cases of ureteric injury. Later experience (eight cases) demonstrated a reduction in operative time (11 h 10 min vs. 6 h 38 min), with no ureteric injuries and a reduction in major operative morbidity from 25% to 12.5% (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3). At the time of reporting, nine successful live births have occurred, with six ongoing pregnancies. Conclusions: Robotic living donor hysterectomy represents a safe approach to minimize donor harm without compromising UTx recipient, graft, and pregnancy-related outcomes. A learning curve is demonstrated with the adoption of the novel technique-with particularly care required to prevent ureteric injuries, and ongoing vigilance and reporting necessary given the small case numbers of robotic living donor hysterectomy reported internationally.

Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists.

Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven to be a highly effective method for rehabilitating individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. However, challenges persist, particularly in cases where CI failure necessitates re-implantation. This study aims to address the gap in understanding the knowledge and practices of audiologists in the UK regarding cochlear re-implantation through a comprehensive questionnaire survey. A bespoke questionnaire was distributed to audiologists working with CI across the UK. The survey, which included multiple-choice items, open-text responses, and visual analogue scales, was made accessible via an online link shared through professional bodies, email groups, and social media platforms. The survey received 27 responses, predominantly from female audiologists (71.4%), with significant representation from London (28.6%) and the East of England (21.4%). A majority of respondents had over 16 years of CI experience (35.7%) and held a master's degree (60.7%). Key reasons for CI re-implantation included electrode failure (82.1%) and hermetic seal failure (60.7%). While respondents showed strong confidence in counselling (88.8%) and managing re-implanted devices (84.6%), there was a noted variation in opinions regarding the need for additional training in intraoperative measures. This survey highlights the current practices and training needs of UK audiologists in CI re-implantation. This underscores the importance of targeted training to fill knowledge gaps and improve clinical care during CI re-implantation, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both audiologists and CI recipients.

American Society of Transplant Surgeons Normothermic Regional Perfusion Standards: Abdominal.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has emerged as a vital technique in organ procurement, particularly in donation after circulatory death (DCD) cases, offering the potential to optimize organ utilization and improve posttransplant outcomes. Recognizing its significance, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) convened a work group to develop standardized recommendations for abdominal NRP in the United States. The workgroup, comprising experts in NRP, DCD, and transplantation, formulated recommendations through a collaborative process involving revisions and approvals by relevant committees and the ASTS council. Four key areas were identified for standardization: Preprocedure communication, NRP procedure, Terminology and documentation, and Mentorship/credentialing. The recommendations encompass a range of considerations, including preprocedure communication protocols to facilitate informed decision-making by transplant centers and organ procurement organizations, procedural guidelines for NRP teams, uniform terminology to clarify the NRP process, and standards for mentorship and credentialing of NRP practitioners. Specific recommendations address logistical concerns, procedural nuances, documentation requirements, and the importance of ongoing quality assurance. The standardized recommendations for abdominal NRP presented in this article aim to ensure consistency, safety, and efficacy in the organ procurement process. By establishing clear protocols and guidelines, the ASTS seeks to enhance organ utilization, honor donor wishes, and uphold public trust in the donation process. Implementation of these recommendations can contribute to the advancement of NRP practices and improve outcomes for transplant recipients.

Consensus Statement: Technical Standards for Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion.

Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a powerful technique for optimizing organ procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. Despite its rapid adoption, standardized guidelines for TA-NRP implementation are lacking, prompting the need for consensus recommendations to ensure safe and effective utilization of this technique. A working group composed of members from The American Society of Transplant Surgeons, The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery was convened to develop technical guidelines for TA-NRP. The group systematically reviewed existing literature, consensus statements, and expert opinions to identify key areas requiring standardization, including predonation evaluation, intraoperative management, postdonation procedures, and future research directions. The working group formulated recommendations encompassing donor evaluation and selection criteria, premortem testing and therapeutic interventions, communication protocols, and procedural guidelines for TA-NRP implementation. These recommendations aim to facilitate coordination among transplant teams, minimize variability in practice, and promote transparency and accountability throughout the TA-NRP process. The consensus guidelines presented herein serve as a comprehensive framework for the successful and ethical implementation of TA-NRP programs in organ procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. By providing standardized recommendations and addressing areas of uncertainty, these guidelines aim to enhance the quality, safety, and efficiency of TA-NRP procedures, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes for transplant recipients.

The Role of Angiopoietins in Cardiovascular Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients: An Ancillary Study from the FAVORIT

Plain Language SummaryWe have identified compelling insights into the role of two proteins called angiopoietin 1 and 2, which are needed, in balance, for healthy blood vessels to form. In the case of kidney transplants from deceased donors, we found that high levels of angiopoietin-2, suggest a higher risk of future heart problems, kidney transplant failure, and even death. As such, our study reaffirms that high levels of angiopoietin-2 in the blood is a marker of blood vessel injury and inflammation. Notably, when we included information about these proteins along with the regular medical details, we were better at predicting important clinical outcomes. Understanding these proteins could help us figure out which KTRs are at a higher risk, so we can take better care of them and potentially improve their outcomes.

Improved outcomes of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donors.

Liver transplantation is considered to be the only curative treatment for decompensated liver disease. Shortage of liver allografts is a major impediment to the widespread application of this procedure. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) grafts have been used successfully, thereby increasing the living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) donor pool. However, ABO-I liver transplantation is associated with complications like acute liver rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis, and higher biliary stricture rates, leading to transplant failure, retransplantations, or sepsis-related complications. Various desensitization strategies have been adopted to improve outcomes. Biologically related donor-recipient pairs have the theoretical advantage of favorable HLA (human leukocyte antigen) match. We have analyzed the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT and compared the results of HLA-matched (biologically related) and HLA-unmatched (biologically unrelated) donor-recipient pairs. Retrospective data of 90 cases of ABO-I liver transplant recipients: HLA-matched (n = 35) and HLA-unmatched (n = 55) for comparison of preoperative and postoperative data. Peak bilirubin levels in HLA-unmatched recipients were higher. Platelet count was lower than HLA-matched recipients (7.3 vs. 8.9mg/dL). No significant difference in days-to-normal bilirubin, peak International Normalised Ratio, hospital stay, and discharge-day from transplant between both groups. Postoperatively, HLA-unmatched recipients required more pulse-steroids therapy than HLA-matched: 21/55 (38.2%) versus 11/35 (31.4%). Biliary complications and interventions were more prevalent in the HLA-unmatched group (12/55, 21.8%) than in the HLA-matched group (4/35, 11.4%). Renal complications requiring postoperative hemodialysis were more prevalent in the HLA-unmatched group than the HLA-matched group (9/55 [16.4%] vs. 3/35 [8.6%]). The incidence of vascular complications was similar. ABO-I LDLT is an effective and safe method for increasing the donor pool in the absence of an ABO-compatible liver donor. Long-term outcomes of recipients with biologically related donors are marginally better than biologically unrelated ABO-I LDLT recipients. However, the incidence of antibody-mediated graft rejection and biliary complications is higher in biologically unrelated ABO-I liver recipients.

Outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients receiving organs from a donor with Fusarium solani species complex meningitis.

Five organs (heart, right lung, liver, right, and left kidneys) from a deceased patient were transplanted into five recipients in four US states; the deceased patient was identified as part of a healthcare-associated fungal meningitis outbreak among patients who underwent epidural anesthesia in Matamoros, Mexico. After transplant surgeries occurred, Fusarium solani species complex, a fungal pathogen with a high case-mortality rate, was identified in cerebrospinal fluid from the organ donor by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and fungal-specific polymerase chain reaction and in plasma by mNGS. Four of five transplant recipients received recommended voriconazole prophylaxis; four were monitored weekly by serum (1-3)-β-d-glucan testing. All five were monitored for signs of infection for at least 3 months following transplantation. The liver recipient had graft failure, which was attributed to an etiology unrelated to fungal infection. No fungal DNA was identified in sections of the explanted liver, suggesting that F. solani species complex did not contribute to graft failure. The remaining recipients experienced no signs or symptoms suggestive of fusariosis. Antifungal prophylaxis may be useful in preventing donor-derived infections in recipients of organs from donors that are found to have Fusarium meningitis.

Etiology-Specific Effects of Impaired Functional Status on Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Pre-liver transplant (LT) functional status is an important determinant of prognosis post LT. There is insufficient data on how functional status affects outcomes of transplant recipients based on the specific etiology of liver disease. We stratified LT recipients by etiology of liver disease to evaluate the effects of functional status on post-LT prognosis in each subgroup. 2005-2019 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) was used to select patients with liver transplant. A total of 14,290 patients were included in the analysis. These patients were stratified by functional status according to Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score: no assistance, some assistance, or total assistance. They were then further divided into six diagnosis categories: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), hereditary disorders, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, autoimmune disease (AID), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and graft failure, while secondary endpoints included organ-specific causes of death. Those under the age of 18 and those with non-whole liver or prior liver transplantation were excluded. Patients with MASLD requiring some assistance (aHR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.39, p = 0.04) and those requiring total assistance (aHR: 2.32, 95% CI 1.48-3.64, p < 0.001) had higher incidences of graft failure compared to those requiring no assistance. Those with MASLD requiring total assistance had a higher all-cause mortality rate than those needing no assistance (aHR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89, p < 0.001). Patients with hereditary causes of liver disease showed a lower incidence of all-cause mortality in recipients needing some assistance compared with those needing no assistance (aHR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.80, p = 0.003). LT recipients with hepatitis C, AID, and ALD all showed higher incidences of all-cause mortality in the total assistance cohort when compared to the no assistance cohort. For the secondary endpoints of specific cause of death, transplant recipients with MASLD needing total assistance had higher rates of death due to general cardiac causes, graft rejection, general infectious causes, sepsis, general renal causes, and general respiratory causes. Patients with MASLD cirrhosis demonstrated the worst overall outcomes, suggesting that this population may be particularly vulnerable. Poor functional status in patients with end-stage liver disease from hepatitis B or hereditary disease was not associated with a significantly increased rate of adverse outcomes, suggesting that the KPS score may not be broadly applicable to all patients awaiting LT.

Plasma Transfusion and Recipient Outcomes: One Size Does Not Fit All!

Plasma Transfusion and Recipient Outcomes: One Size Does Not Fit All!

Changes in waiting time, need for mechanical circulatory support and outcomes in paediatric heart transplant recipients.

Heart transplantation is a well-established treatment for end-stage heart failure in paediatric patients, demonstrating excellent long-term outcomes. This retrospective study analyses 35years of data on 244 paediatric recipients (<18years) at a single institution from 1986 to 2022. The analysis explores changes in diagnoses, survival, waiting times and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over three decades (1991-2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2020). Survival outcomes significantly improved over the study period, with 1-year survival rates increasing from 79.3% (1991-2000) to 92.3% (2011-2020, P=0.041). The median overall survival was 18.0years, and median conditional survival to 1year post-transplant was 20.9years. Survival differences were noted among age groups, with infants under 1year of age experiencing higher early mortality, and adolescents (aged 11-17years) facing increased long-term risks, possibly linked to adult donor characteristics. Waiting times for heart transplantation increased, especially for younger age groups (0-5 and 6-10years), reflecting the growing demand for donor organs. The use of MCS, including ventricular assist devices (VAD), surged, with 67% of recipients in the most recent decade receiving pre-transplant VAD support. Importantly, despite prolonged waiting times and increased VAD use, overall survival continued to be favourable. Early and long-term results after paediatric heart transplantation have been continuously improving over the past decades. Despite an increased demand for donor organs and the growing reliance on VAD as bridge to transplantation, post-transplantation survival is not compromised.

Perioperative Fluid Management in Paediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Perioperative fluid management remains a challenging aspect of paediatric liver transplantation (LT) because of the risk of postoperative complications and haemodynamic instability. Limited research has specifically investigated the impact of fluid management and transfusion on mortality and morbidity in pediatric LT patients. This systematic review summarizes the evidence regarding perioperative fluid management and its clinical outcomes in paediatric LT patients. All primary studies published in English evaluating perioperative fluid management in paediatric LT patients were eligible. PubMed, EBSCOHost, Embase, Proquest, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to December 19, 2023. Risks of bias were assessed using the Joanna-Briggs Institute checklist. The results were synthesized narratively. Five retrospective cohort studies of good-excellent quality were included in this review. Two studies evaluated intraoperative fluid administration, one study compared postoperative fluid balance (FB) with outcomes, and two studies compared massive versus non-massive transfusion. A higher mortality rate was associated with intravenous lactated ringer's (LR) than with normal saline, but not with massive transfusion (MT). Longer hospital stays were correlated with MT, >20% positive FB in the first 72 hours, and greater total intraoperative blood product administration. Higher intraoperative fluid administration was associated with a greater thrombotic risk. Additionally, intraoperative MT and lR infusion were associated with an increased risk of 30-day graft loss and graft dysfunction, respectively. Fluid management may impact the outcomes of paediatric LT recipients. These findings underscore the need for more studies to explore the best fluid management and evaluation strategies for children undergoing LT.