Mortality In Recipients Research Articles

High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.

The indications and outcomes of Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) remain sub-optimally defined. Risk factors for renal graft failure after SHKT also remain poorly defined. We analyzed the renal graft outcomes among SHKT recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2015-2020. To evaluate for factors associated with poor renal outcomes, we compared SHKT and kidney transplantation alone (KTA) recipients using propensity score matching. Among SHKT recipients, rate of primary non-function (PNF) of kidney graft was 3%, 30-day kidney graft failure rate was 7.0%, and the 30-day post-transplant mortality rate was 4.1%. The incidence of delayed kidney graft function (KDGF) was 27.5%. Kidney graft failure was seen early post-SHKT with most common causes of patient death (43.9%) and PNF of kidney graft (41.5%). One-year and two-year patient survival was 89.2% and 86.5%, and one-year and two-year freedom from kidney graft failure was 85.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of SHKT recipients, use of pre-transplant mechanical cardiac support (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.57, P=0.017), higher cPRA (aOR 1.76, P=0.016), and older donor age per 10 years (aOR 1.94, P=0.001) were associated with PNF. Pre-transplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with the increased risk of 30-day recipient mortality (aOR 5.55, P=0.002). Increased 30-day graft failure was seen in SHKT recipients with pre-transplant mechanical cardiac support (aOR 1.77, P=0.038) and dialysis at time of transplant (aOR 1.72, P=0.044). Multivariable Cox-Hazard analysis demonstrated that SHKT, when compared to KTA, is associated with increased kidney graft failure (Hazard Ratio, 2.56, P<0.001) and recipient mortality (Hazard Ratio: 2.65, P<0.001). SHKT is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure. Identification of risk factors for renal graft failure can help optimize recipient selection for SHKT vs Kidney after HT, especially after introduction of the new safety-net policy.

Pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variation in patients with myeloid malignancies and their unrelated HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell donors

Aims: The revised 2022 World Health Organization classification recognizes myeloid neoplasms with associated germline predisposition as a defined subcategory, underscoring the clinical significance of likely pathogenic (LPV) and pathogenic (PV) germline variation in these diseases. To better understand the role of LPV/PV in blood or marrow transplants (BMT), a curative therapy for myeloid neoplasms, we measure their frequency and association with mortality in two cohorts of donor-recipient pairs. Methods: LPV/PV frequencies in 665 cancer-related genes were measured using exomechip genotyping data in 1990 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients and their unrelated donors, registered with the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test variant association with recipient mortality one-year post-transplant. Results: Thirteen autosomal dominant (AD) LPV/PV in eight genes were found in 2.8% of patients and 2.2% of donors; those linked to autosomal recessive conditions appeared in 11.1% of patients and 11% of donors. The most common AD LPV/PV mutations in recipients were found in DDX41 (n = 18). For donors, the most frequent AD PVs occurred in CHEK2 (n = 21) and Fanconi Anemia (FA) genes (n = 7). DDX41 and CHEK2 variation did not correlate with patient survival, but patients with donors with an LPV/PVs in an FA gene had lower survival (HR = 2.38, 95%CI: 1.06-5.31, P = 0.035) than patients whose donors did not have an FA LPV/PV. Conclusion: We identified LPVs/PVs in cancer genes in donors and recipients and are the first to show an association of donor FA PVs with mortality after BMT.

Standardized risk-stratified cardiac assessment and early posttransplant cardiovascular complications in kidney transplant recipients.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipient (KTR). There is a dearth of standardized guidelines on optimal cardiovascular evaluation of transplant candidates. This single-center cohort study aims to determine the effectiveness of our standardized risk-stratified pretransplant cardiovascular screening protocol, which includes coronary angiography (CAG), in identifying advanced CVD, the proper pretransplant management of which could lead to a reduction in the incidence of major cardiac events (MACE) in the early posttransplant period. Out of the total 776 KTR transplanted between 2017 and 2019, CAG was performed on 541 patients (69.7%), of whom 22.4% were found to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Asymptomatic obstructive CAD was observed in 70.2% of cases. In 73.6% of cases, CAG findings resulted in myocardial revascularization. MACE occurred in 5.6% (N = 44) of the 23 KTR with pretransplant CVD and 21 without pretransplant CVD. KTR with posttransplant MACE occurrence had significantly worse kidney graft function at the first year posttransplant (p = 0.00048) and worse patient survival rates (p = 0.0063) during the 3-year follow-up period compared with KTR without MACE. After adjustment, the independent significant factors for MACE were arrhythmia (HR 2.511, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.158-5.444), pretransplant history of acute myocardial infarction (HR 0.201, p = 0.046, 95% CI 0.042-0.970), and pretransplant myocardial revascularization (HR 0.225, p = 0.045, 95% CI 0.052-0.939). Asymptomatic CVD is largely prevalent in KTR. Posttransplant MACE has a negative effect on grafts and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to assess the benefits of pretransplant myocardial revascularization in asymptomatic kidney transplant candidates.

Ten-year outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac transplant recipients

BackgroundCardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is one of the major late causes of mortality in cardiac transplant recipients beyond the first year. Given the lack of longer term data for PCI in cardiac transplant recipients, we report ten year follow up of such cardiac transplant recipients who underwent PCI at Mayo Clinic. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted that included cardiac transplant recipients who underwent PCI at the Mayo Clinic. Continuous variables were presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR) and discrete variables were presented as frequency (percentage). ResultsThirty-eight consecutive cardiac transplant recipients underwent PCI from January 1, 1995, to June 30, 2023, at the Mayo Clinic. The median age of the cohort was 61.00 years (IQR:51.00–70.00) comprised predominantly of men (65.80%), and 47.40% of the cohort presented with an acute coronary syndrome. The antirejection therapy prior to the PCI included steroids (47.30%), cyclosporine (26.30%), tacrolimus (15.80%), mycophenolate (42.10%), azathioprine (13.10%), & sirolimus (31.57%). Intravascular ultrasound during PCI was utilized in 10.50% of the cases. The median time duration between heart transplant and PCI was 9.00 years (IQR:6.00–13.00 years). Two individuals needed repeat heart transplant for severe CAV. In hospital mortality was 5.20% and the long-term median survival was 7.20 years with a 10-year mortality rate of 65.70%. ConclusionsThis is the first publication reporting ten-year outcomes for PCI in cardiac transplant patients. The salient features for our cohort were a 65.70% mortality rate at 10 years and a median survival of 7.20 years.

Usage of older donors is associated with higher mortality after heart transplantation: A UNOS observational study

IntroductionUtilization of heart from older donors is variable across centers with uncertain outcomes of recipients. We sought to utilize a national registry to examine usage and outcomes of heart transplant recipients from older donors. We also explored the impact of current donor heart allocation scheme on outcomes of hearts from older donors. MethodsThis observational study utilized the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2015 and 2023 with donors categorized into age < 45 years or ≥ 45 years and evaluated organ disposition and geographical variation. 30-day, 1- and 3- year mortality, and graft failure rates were compared amongst recipients as per donor age group. We also evaluated annual trends in HT for each group over the follow-up period. Results24,966 adult donors were recovered: 3,742 (15.0%) were ≥ 45 years; 3,349 (15.6%) adults received heart from such donors with significant geographical variation, and a declining utilization in the transplantation rate in current donor allocation system. Donors with age ≥ 45 years had higher comorbidities and were allotted with a significantly shorter ischemic time to recipients who were significantly less likely to receive temporary mechanical circulatory support and more likely female. Unadjusted and adjusted, 30-day mortality were similar but 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure rates were significantly higher in recipients of such donors. spline analysis suggested a higher 1-year mortality risk at older donor age with risk increasing after age 40 years. ConclusionsOlder donor age was associated with worsened 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure for heart transplant recipients.

The triglyceride-glucose index: a novel predictor of stroke and all-cause mortality in liver transplantation recipients

BackgroundThe triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, identified as a reliable indicator of insulin resistance (IR), was reported to be associated with stroke recurrence and morbidity in the general population and critically ill patients. However, the relationship in liver transplantation (LT) recipients remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the TyG index and post-LT stroke along with all-cause mortality and further assess the influence of IR on the LT recipients’ prognosis.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study enrolled 959 patients who underwent LT at a university-based medical centre between January 2015 and January 2021. The participants were divided into three groups according to their TyG index tertiles. The primary outcome was post-LT stroke. Multivariate logistic regression, COX proportional hazards regression, and restricted cubic spline RCS were used to examine the association between the TyG index and outcomes in LT recipients.ResultsWith a median TyG index of 8.23 (7.78–8.72), 780 (87.18% males) patients were eventually included. The incidence of post-LT stroke was 5.38%, and the in-hospital, 1-year, and 3-year mortality rates were 5.54%, 13.21%, and 15.77%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed an independent association between the TyG index and an increased risk of post-LT stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.398 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.371–8.426) P = 0. 008], in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.326 (95% CI: 1.089–4.931) P = 0.025], 1-year mortality [aHR, 1.668 (95% CI: 1.024–2.717) P = 0.039], and 3-year mortality [aHR, 1.837 (95% CI: 1.445–2.950) P = 0.012]. Additional RCS analysis also suggested a linear increase in the risk of postoperative stroke with elevated TyG index (P for nonlinearity = 0.480).ConclusionsThe TyG index may be a valuable and reliable indicator for assessing stroke risk and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LT, suggesting its potential relevance in improving risk stratification during the peri-LT period.

Virus-specific T-cells from third party or transplant donors for treatment of EBV lymphoproliferative diseases arising post hematopoietic cell or solid organ transplantation.

EBV+ lymphomas constitute a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplants (SOT). Phase I and II trials have shown that in HCT recipients, adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T-cells from the HCT donor can safely induce durable remissions of EBV+ lymphomas including 70->90% of patients who have failed to respond to treatment with Rituximab. More recently, EBV-specific T-cells generated from allogeneic 3rd party donors have also been shown to induce durable remission of EBV+ lymphomas in Rituximab refractory HCT and SOT recipients. In this review, we compare results of phase I and II trials of 3rd party and donor derived EBV-specific T-cells. We focus on the attributes and limitations of each product in terms of access, safety, responses achieved and durability. The limited data available regarding donor and host factors contributing to T cell persistence is also described. We examine factors contributing to treatment failures and approaches to prevent or salvage relapse. Lastly, we summarize strategies to further improve results for virus-specific immunotherapies for post-transplant EBV lymphomas.

Risk Factors Associated with PTLD Related Mortality in Adult Multivisceral Transplant Recipients - A Single Centre Cohort Study.

Background: PTLD is a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative diseases which can add significant mortality following multivisceral transplantation (MVTx). Our study aimed to identify potential risk factors of mortality in adult MVTx recipients who developed PTLD. Methods: All adult recipients of intestinal-containing grafts transplanted in our institution between 2013 and 2022, and who developed PTLD, were included in the study. Results: PTLD-associated mortality was 28.6% (6/21). Increased relative risk of mortality was associated with Stage 3 ECOG performance score (p=0.005; HR 34.77; 95%CI 2.94-410.91), if the recipients had a splenectomy (p=0.036; HR 14.36; 95%CI 1.19-172.89), or required retransplantation (p=0.039; HR 11.23; 95% CI 1.13-112.12). There was a significant trend for increased risk of PTLD mortality with higher peak EBV load (p=0.008), longer time from MVTx to PTLD diagnosis (p=0.008), and higher donor age (p 0.001). Peak LDH before treatment commencement was significantly higher in the mortality group vs the survival group (520.3 +- 422.8 IU/L vs 321.8 +- 154.4 IU/L; HR 1.00, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.01, p=0.019). Peak viral load prior to treatment initiation (Cycle Threshold (CT) cutoff = 32) correlated with the relative risk of death in MVTx patients who developed PTLD [29.4 (3.5) CTs in survivors compared to 23.0 (4.0) CTs in the mortality group]. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify risk factors for PTLD-associated mortality in an adult MVTx recipient cohort. Validation in larger multicentre studies and subsequent risk stratification according to these risk factors may contribute to better survival in this group of patients.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Disease in Comparison with Influenza in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Nationwide Research Network in the United States

COVID-19 infection has worse outcomes in immunocompromised individuals. This includes those with diabetes mellitus, cancer, chronic autoimmune diseases requiring immunomodulatory therapy, and solid-organ transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Using the National Inpatient Sample Database, this study retrospectively compared 14,915 renal transplant recipients who were hospitalized with either COVID-19 or Influenza virus infection in the US at any point between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2020. We found that compared to renal transplant recipients with influenza infection, recipients with COVID-19 infection were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support and develop acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. COVID-19 patients also had significantly longer length of hospital stay. Renal transplant recipients with COVID-19 had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to recipients with influenza infection (14.09% vs 2.61%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.73 [95% CI (5.74-16.52)], P < .001). Our study clearly demonstrates the severe outcomes of high mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19. Further research should be undertaken to focus on the key areas noted to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

Spectrum of Pneumonia in Renal Transplant Recipients: An Indian Experience.

Respiratory tract infections are life-threatening infections in solid-organ transplant recipients that pose risk to the graft and to the patient. This study was undertaken to examine the clinical and microbiological spectrum of pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Of 400 consecutive renal transplant recipients, 87 recipients (21.8%) were hospitalized between November 2014 and October 2016 with pneumonia. We examined demographic profiles and clinical investigations. The median age of patients was 38 years (range, 19-72 y). The mean time of presentation after renal transplant was 18 months (range, 1-174 mo). Most patients (80.5%) were on maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids; 34% of patients had an induction agent. Chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis B infections were found in 12.6% and 2.2% of patients, respectively, and new-onset diabetes in 19.5% of patients. Fever (88%), cough (87%), shortness of breath (68%), and hypotension (33%) were common presenting symptoms. Diarrhea was the most frequent accompanying symptom, found in 9.2% of patients. Cytopenia and graft dysfunction were present in 38.7% and 80.4% of patients. Among infections, fungal infections were the most frequent (30%) followed by mixed infections (20.7%), tuberculosis (12.6%), bacterial (12.6%), and viral (3.5%) infections. Etiology could not be found in 27.6% patients. Mortality rate was 24.1%, with the highest rates for fungal infections (44%), followed by bacterial (25%) and mixed infections (18%). Presence of hypoxia and hypotension at presentation was associated with increased risk of death, whereas use of induction agents, new-onset diabetes posttransplant, diabetes mellitus, and acute kidney injury were not correlated with death or increased duration of hospital stay. Pneumonia carries high risk of mortality in renal transplant recipients. Fungal and bacterial infections carry high risk of mortality. Despite invasive investigations, a substantial number of patients had unidentified etiology.

Assessing the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in solid organ transplant recipients: a new frontier in antimicrobial stewardship.

Post-transplant infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and local standardized antimicrobial treatment guidelines may contribute to improved clinical outcomes. Our study assessed the rate of therapeutic compliance with local standard guidelines in the treatment of common infections in SOTR, and their associated outcomes. Consecutive adult SOTRs admitted to the transplant floor from January-September 2020 and were treated for an infectious syndrome were followed until discharge or for 30 days following the date of diagnosis, whichever was shorter. Data was extracted from electronic medical records. Guideline compliance was characterized as either appropriate, effective but unnecessary, undertreatment, or inappropriate. Nine hundred and thirty-six SOTR were admitted to the transplant ward, of which 328 patients (35%) received treatment for infectious syndromes. Guidelines were applicable to 252 patients, constituting 275 syndromes: 86 pneumonias; 82 urinary tract infections; 40 intra-abdominal infections; 38 bloodstream infections; and 29 C. difficile infections. 200/246 (81%) of infectious syndromes received appropriate or effective but unnecessary empiric treatment. In addition, appropriate tailoring of antimicrobials resulted in a significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted OR of 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.38; P = .002). Lastly, we found that guideline-compliant empiric therapy was found to prevent the development of multi-drug resistance in a time-dependent analysis (adjusted HR of 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.52; P = .001). Our data show that adherence to locally developed guidelines was associated with reduced mortality and resistant-organism development in our cohort of SOTR.

Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques.

Background: In robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH), hepatic duct division (HDD) and its stump closure technique are of paramount importance in avoiding postoperative biliary complications in both donors and recipients. We describe our novel triple C ("clip-clamp-cut") technique of HDD. Methods: Out of 4016 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) (2004-October 2023), we have performed 208 RDH cases since December 2019. This study is a retrospective analysis of the first 160 RDH cases. After excluding the first 20 RDH cases (learning curve) and 3 left-sided RDH cases, 137 cases with no exclusion criteria were included. We divided these 137 donors into the "cut and suture" (CS) group (n = 33) and the "triple C" technique group (n = 104). We compared intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes. Results: All 137 robotic donors and 128/137 recipients are currently well. Donor biliary leak rate was significantly lower among the triple C group (n = 3, 2.9%) compared to the CS group (n = 5, 15.2%) (p=0.009). No other differences in postdonation morbidity were observed among the two groups. Recipient biliary complication rate was lower in the triple C group than in the CS group although not statistically significant (10.6% vs. 15.1%; p=0.537), despite more multiple biliary anastomoses in the former. No significant differences in post-transplant recipient morbidity and mortality were observed. Conclusions: Our simple yet novel triple C technique enables clean, precise, bloodless HDD resulting in lower donor and potentially recipient biliary complication rates. The ease and reproducibility make it ideal for widespread adoption.

Liver transplantation program at the Burnasyan Federal Biophysical Center: experience in 500 procedures

To analyze the features and outcomes of 500 liver transplantations in adults over a 12-year period. The study included data on 500 liver transplantations between May 2010 and April 2023. We analyzed 483 adults who underwent transplantation and 438 candidates for this procedure. All data were obtained from local liver transplantation registry. Clinical outcomes were recorded as of June 1, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc., USA) and Jamovi version 2.3.21.0 software (Jamovi project). Among 438 patients in the waiting list between January 2012 and May 2023, liver transplantation was performed in 198 (45%) cases including 27 (6%) transplantations from living-related donors and 37 (8%) procedures in other centers. There were 109 (25%) deaths. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 81% (95% CI 76-85%) and 50% (95% CI 42-59%), respectively. Organs from deceased donors (n=134, 27%) and living-related donors (n=366, 73%) were used for transplantations. Redo transplantations were necessary in 21 (4%) cases. The median age of recipients was 45 years (range 18-72), median MELD-Na score - 16 (range 6-43). The most common indications for transplantation were viral cirrhosis (37%), cholestatic liver disease (16%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (14%). Monotherapy with calcineurin inhibitors was performed in 39% of cases, combination of calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids, antimetabolites or mTOR inhibitors - 52%, three-component schemes - 8% of cases. Annual, 5- and 7-year survival rates of recipients after primary transplantation were 87% (95% CI: 84-90%), 79% (95% CI: 75-83%) and 75% (95% CI: 70-80%), respectively. In case of liver transplantation from living-related donors, these values were 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), 84% (95% CI: 80-88%) and 80% (95% CI: 75-85%), after transplantation from deceased donors - 81% (95% CI: 74-88%), 66% (95% CI: 57-76%) and 58% (95% CI: 45-72%), respectively. Liver transplantation is highly effective for patients with diffuse and focal liver diseases. Living donors not only significantly improve availability of this technology, but also provide substantial advantages in outcomes compared to liver transplantation from deceased donors, reducing the likelihood of recipient mortality by 10% after one post-transplantation year and by more than 20% after five years.

Impact of an ultrasensitive Cytomegalovirus quantitative nucleic acid test on Cytomegalovirus detection and therapy in renal transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has broad implications for morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Routine surveillance for CMV replication with PCR-based quantitative nucleic acid testing (qNAT) assays is standard practice in most transplant centers, but the impact of assay sensitivity on antiviral decision-making and virologic outcomes has not been studied. We investigated the effects of an ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assay on multiple clinical outcomes, including time to detection and duration of CMV DNAemia. We conducted a single-center cohort study contrasting RTRs monitored with a qNAT with a higher lower limit of quantification (LLOQ >300IU/mL) with those monitored with a more sensitive qNAT (LLOQ >35IU/mL). Patients were stratified by donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus (D+/R-: high risk; any R+: moderate risk). CMV viral load monitoring was performed monthly post transplantation, with the primary outcomes being time to CMV DNAemia and its duration. Total 1382 patients were analyzed from 2014 to 2016 and 2019 to 2021. Moderate-risk RTRs monitored with the more sensitive assay experienced a greater hazard for the development of a first episode of CMV DNAemia (aHR: 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-2.46) and an average of 24 (95% CI: 16.40-31.98) additional days of DNAemia. There was no difference in CMV end-organ disease or 1-year all-cause mortality between moderate-risk RTRs. The more sensitive assay was associated with earlier detection and extended durations of CMV DNAemia in moderate-risk RTRs, without altering clinical outcomes. These findings inform optimal use of these assays and antiviral stewardship in RTRs. The use of ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assays in moderate-risk CMV renal transplant recipients is associated with earlier detection and longer durations of CMV DNAemia without impacting CMV end-organ disease or 1-year mortality.

The impact of hepatitis B and C positive serologies on the outcomes of non-hepatic solid organ transplantation in the United States.

Chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infection could negatively affect outcomes of non-hepatic solid organ transplantations due to the risk of viral reactivation in the presence of immunosuppression. This study aimed to determine post-transplant outcomes in patients with HBV or HCV positivity receiving non-hepatic solid-state organ transplant. Data was collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2006-2021 for patients (≥18) who received a lung, heart, or kidney single organ transplant in the U.S. Hepatitis C positivity (HCV+) was determined as positive HCV Ab and hepatitis B positivity (HBV+) as positive HBsAg. We included N = 30,872 lung, N = 36,990 heart and N = 280,162 kidney transplant recipients. The prevalence of HBV+ was 1.3% in lung, 1.5% in heart and 1.7% in kidney patients, HCV+ was 2.2%, 2.2% and 5.0%, respectively. Post-transplant survival of patients with vs. without HBV+ was similar in all solid organ transplants (all p > .05). Similarly, there was no difference in post-transplant survival between lung transplant recipients with vs. without anti-HCV (all p > .05). Heart transplant recipients with HCV+ had higher crude post-transplant mortality (all p < .01). Similarly, there was higher post-transplant mortality in kidney transplant recipients with HCV+ (1-year: 6% vs. 3%; 5-year: 21% vs. 13%; 10-year: 47% vs. 31%; all p < .0001). In multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, only the association of HCV+ with higher post-kidney transplant mortality remained significant: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (95% CI) = 1.16 (1.12-1.20), p < .0001. There was no association of viral hepatitis seropositivity with the risk of graft failure in all groups (p > .05). In most cases, the presence of HBV or HCV serologies is not associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes in non-hepatic solid organ transplants. However, kidney transplant recipients who are positive for HCV serology have an increased risk for post-transplant mortality.

Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation in recipients of hepatitis c virus-infected donor hearts

Hepatitis C Virus positive (HCV+) organ donors offer a viable strategy for expansion of the heart donor pool without an increased risk of recipient mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an effective tool for graft surveillance in heart transplant (HT) recipients. However, there are no data comparing CMR findings in HT recipients based on donor HCV status. The aim of this propensity score matched case-control study was to evaluate baseline CMR characteristics of HCV+ HT recipients and HCV- HT recipients, as well as compare cardiac allograft structure, function, performance, and tissue characterization between groups. CMR normative values did not differ between groups in matched analysis. There were no significant differences in CMR-derived biventricular function, strain, LGE, or myocardial tissue characteristics by parametric mapping. This study suggests CMR can be a valuable tool for surveillance in HCV+ HT patients, and abnormalities on imaging should not be attributed to HCV infection.

Prevention and Management of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Anti-rejection medications are essential in preventing organ rejection amongst solid organ transplant recipients; however, these agents also cause profound immunosuppression, predisposing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) to infectious complications. The timely management including prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of such infectious complications is vital to prevent significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients and allograft dysfunction. LTRs are inundated with microbes that may be recognized as commensals in hosts with intact immune systems. Bacterial infections are the most common ones, followed by viral pathogens. Indications of a brewing infectious process may be subtle. Hence, the importance of adapting vigilance around isolated hints through symptomatology and signs is pivotal. Signals to suggest an infectious process, such as fever and leukocytosis, may be dampened by immunosuppressive agents. One must also be vigilant about drug interactions of antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents. Treatment of infections can become challenging, as antimicrobials can interact with immunosuppressive agents, and antimicrobial resistance can surge under antimicrobial pressure. Transplant infectious disease physicians work in concert with transplant teams to obtain specimens for diagnostic testing and follow through with source control when possible. This heavily impacts medical decisions and fosters a multidisciplinary approach in management. Furthermore, the reduction of immunosuppression, although it augments the risk of allograft rejection, is as crucial as the initiation of appropriate antimicrobials when it comes to the management of infections.

Revised Heart Allocation Policy Improved Waitlist Mortality and Waiting Time With Maintained Outcomes in En-Bloc Heart-Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients.

The revised United Network for Organ Sharing heart allocation policy was implemented in October 2018. Using a national transplant database, this study evaluated the transplant rate, waitlist mortality, waiting time, and other outcomes of en-bloc heart-lung transplantation recipients. Adult patients registered on the national database for heart-lung transplants before and after the policy update were selected as cohorts. Baseline characteristics, transplant rates, waitlist mortality, waiting times, and other outcomes were compared between the two periods. In total, 370 patients were registered for heart-lung transplants during the pre- and post-periods. There were significantly higher transplant rates, shorter waitlist times, and substantially reduced waitlist mortality in the post-period. Registered patients waitlisted in the post-period had significantly higher utilization of intra-aortic balloon pumps, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and overall life support, including ventricular assist devices. Transplant recipients had significantly longer ischemic times, increased transport distances, and shorter waiting times before transplantation in the post-policy period. Transplant recipients held similar short-term survival before and after the policy change (log-rank test, p = 0.4357). Therefore, the revised policy significantly improved access to en-bloc heart-lung allografts compared with the prior policy, with better waitlist outcomes and similar post-transplant outcomes.

Impact of acute kidney injury and renal recovery status in deceased donor to kidney transplant outcome: results from the Thai national transplant registry

The influence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery in deceased donor (DD) on long-term kidney transplant (KT) outcome has not previously been elucidated in large registry study. Our retrospective cohort study included all DDKT performed in Thailand between 2001 and 2018. Donor data was reviewed case by case. AKI was diagnosed according to the KDIGO criteria. Renal recovery was defined if DD had an improvement in AKI to the normal or lower stage. All outcomes were determined until the end of 2020. This study enrolled 4234 KT recipients from 2198 DD. The KDIGO staging of AKI was as follows: stage 1 for 710 donors (32.3%), stage 2 for 490 donors (22.3%) and stage 3 for 342 donors (15.6%). AKI was partial and complete recovery in 265 (17.2%) and 287 (18.6%) before procurement, respectively. Persistent AKI was revealed in 1906 KT of 990 (45%) DD. The ongoing AKI in DD significantly increases the risk of DGF development in the adjusted model (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.44–1.99; p < 0.001). KT from DD with AKI and partial/complete recovery was associated with a lower risk of transplant loss (log-rank P = 0.04) and recipient mortality (log-rank P = 0.042) than ongoing AKI. KT from a donor with ongoing stage 3 AKI was associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft loss (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.12–2.88; p = 0.02) and mortality (HR 2.19; 95% CI 1.09–4.41; p = 0.03) than stage 3 AKI with renal recovery. Persistent AKI, but not recovered AKI, significantly increases the risk of DGF. Utilizing kidneys from donors with improving AKI is generally safe. KT from donors with persistent AKI stage 3 results in a higher risk of transplant failure and recipient mortality. Therefore, meticulous pretransplant evaluation of such kidneys and intensive surveillance after KT is recommended.

Prognosis after heart transplant in patients with hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathy. A nationwide registry analysis

Introduction and objectivesPosttransplant outcomes among recipients with a diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) remain controversial. MethodsRetrospective analysis of a nationwide registry of first-time recipients undergoing isolated heart transplant between 1984 and 2021. One-year and 5-year mortality in recipients with HCM and RCM were compared with those with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). ResultsWe included 3703 patients (3112 DCM; 331 HCM; 260 RCM) with a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.1-5.0] years. Compared with DCM, the adjusted 1-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.38; 95%CI, 1.07-1.78; P=.01, RCM: HR, 1.48; 95%CI, 1.14-1.93; P=.003. The adjusted 5-year mortality risk was: HCM: HR, 1.17; 95%CI, 0.93-1.47; P=.18; RCM: HR, 1.52; 95%CI, 1.22-1.89; P<.001. Over the last 20 years, the RCM group showed significant improvement in 1-year survival (adjusted R2=0.95) and 5-year survival (R2=0.88); the HCM group showed enhanced the 5-year survival (R2=0.59), but the 1-year survival remained stable (R2=0.16). ConclusionsBoth RCM and HCM were linked to a less favorable early posttransplant prognosis compared with DCM. However, at the 5-year mark, this unfavorable difference was evident only for RCM. Notably, a substantial temporal enhancement in both early and late mortality was observed for RCM, while for HCM, this improvement was mainly evident in late mortality.