In biological terms, individual development consistsof “three closely related but, to a certain degree, inde-pendent processes: the increase in the number of cells,cell specialization, and tissue morphogenesis” [1]. Ingenetic terms, it consists in the activation of structuralgenes controlled by regulatory genes [2]. The geneticdescription of ontogeny should also include the multi-plication of the genetic system itself in the course ofcell division. Both descriptions seem comprehensive;however, neither of them explains either the drivingforce or the algorithm of individual development.Mutations of regulatory genes were identified in Drosophila melanogaster with the use of a new proce-dure [3]. This paper describes an unusual characteristicof these mutations, namely, malformations (morpho-ses) caused by them. The authors conclude that themutant genes controlled ontogeny. The parental (mater-nal and paternal) effects on the formation of morphoseswere discovered. Taking them into account, it was sup-posed that the products of the genes controlling ontog-eny function in subsequent cell generations, rather thanin the sites of their synthesis. This is the fundamentaldifference of the genes controlling ontogeny from usualMendelian genes.The fact that genes may generate regulatory prod-ucts “for exportation” became a principle of the theoryof ontogeny. An ontogenetic gene encodes an inactiveregulatory product and initiates cell division. Cell divi-sion activates the product that the daughter cells receivealong with parental genome, thus repressing the pre-ceding gene and activating the next one. The transfer ofactivity from the gene controlling ontogeny to anothergene via the cell-division event has been termed the ele-mentary event of development. In this way, the chainreaction of three related ontogenetic processes—theactivation of genetic information, the increase in cellmass, and the distribution of the activated informationin it—is initiated and maintained.MATERIALS AND METHODSMutations were induced in D. melanogaster. Thecriterion for the selection of mutations for the study wasa lethal effect in a certain genotype and its absence inanother genotype. The mutations were induced by threemethods. Protocol 1. Male Drosophila were γ -irradiated andcrossed with females with attached-X chromosomes.The resultant male offspring contained an irradiatedX chromosome and a haploid set of irradiated auto-somes. Each of the male offspring was individuallycrossed with females from strain yellow . The malewhose offspring did not contain females was consid-ered to carry the X-chromosome mutation [3]. Protocol 2. Male Drosophila were γ -irradiated andcrossed with females carrying inversion Curly in auto-some 2. The resultant male offspring carrying an irradi-ated autosome 2 and autosome Curly were individuallycrossed with females from strain yellow . The malewhose offspring did not contain females or males witha normal phenotype (without Curly ) was considered tocarry the mutation in autosome 2 [4]. Protocol 3. The classical Muller-5 method was usedto obtain recessive lethal mutations in the X chromo-some of Drosophila. To maintain the lethal mutations,we performed crosses between In(1)Muller -5/ lethal females and In(1)Muller -5 males. These crosses did notyield normal males. Crossing females with wild-typemales, we detected cultures in which normal malesappeared. These cultures contained the required muta-tion.The obtained mutations in the X chromosome wereintroduced into culture via crossing a mutant male withfemales that had either linked or inverted X chromo-somes. The mutations in autosome 2 existed in culturesthat contained the mutation in one autosome 2 and thecomplex inversion In(2LR)CyO in the other one. Whenexamining the cultures visually, we found that some ofthe offspring had malformations (morphoses). Morpho-ses were also observed in the offspring of some crossesperformed when studying mutations. Pictures of themorphoses made by means of a digital video camerawere transferred into a computer and stored as separatefiles.
Read full abstract