Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Research Articles

Multi-omics study on the molecular mechanism of anlotinib in regulating tumor metabolism.

e15121 Background: Anlotinib, an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), exerts significant anti-angiogenic and vascular normalization effects. However, the mechanisms underlying its involvement in tumor metabolic reprogramming are still unclear. This study aims to investigate the distribution and expression levels of metabolites within tumors after anlotinib treatment using spatial metabolomics analysis. Methods: This study involves spatially analyzing the distribution differences of metabolites post-anlotinib administration and integrating transcriptomics and proteomics to explore the internal mechanisms of anlotinib action at a molecular level. Results: By integrating the transcriptomics and proteomics analyses, we identified that anlotinib treatment primarily modulated four metabolic pathways, including taurine and hypotaurine metabolism, steroid synthesis, pentose phosphate pathway, and lipid biosynthesis. This regulation significantly influenced the metabolic levels of compounds such as sulfonic acids, cholesterol, inositol phosphate pyrophosphate, and palmitoyl-CoA in the tumor, thereby impacting tumor initiation and progression. Conclusions: This study provides potential metabolic biomarkers for anlotinib treatment in tumors, and may identify potential biomarkers and pathways associated with the therapeutic efficacy of anlotinib treatment.

Cutaneous adverse event profile of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials.

e20049 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the frontline treatment of choice for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, EGFR-TKIs are associated with unique and dramatic dermatologic side effects that negatively impact patients’ quality of life, potentially resulting in poor adherence, including dose reductions or premature treatment cessation. Thus, it is crucial for the oncologists to be familiar with the array of dermatologic manifestations caused by these drugs for effective patient management. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with placebo or chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of all- and high-grade 10 dermatologic adverse events (dAEs). We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to compare the risk of dAEs in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs versus placebo/chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis based on control arm (placebo or chemotherapy) and individual EGFR-TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib of osimertinib) were conducted. Results: 35 RCTs comprising 16,151 patients were included. In addition to all- and high-grade rash (all-grade: 12.21, 95% CI: 9.00-16.56; high-grade: OR 7.83, 95% CI: 5.11-12.00), EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade acne (OR 12.24, 95% CI: 3.11-48.2), dermatitis acneiform (OR 8.46, 95% CI: 4.03-17.8), dry skin (OR 6.15, 95% CI: 4.02-9.40), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (OR 11.14, 95% CI:3.00-41.4), paronychia (OR 31.97, 95% CI: 17.9-57.1), pruritus (OR 2.86, 95% CI: 2.17-3.77), skin exfoliation (OR 7.62, 95% CI: 2.55-22.8), and skin fissures (OR 11.59, 95% CI:4.86-27.6). The increased risk of EGFR-TKI-related dAEs was more prominent when compared with chemotherapy than placebo. In subgroup analyses of individual EGFR-TKIs, the risk of high-grade rash was significantly increased in patients treated with erlotinib or gefitinib but not in those treated with other EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: This is the most comprehensive meta-analysis summarizing currently available evidence on cutaneous toxicity profile of EGFR-TKIs. These findings provide physicians with a better understanding for prompt recognition and management of these dAEs, to avoid unnecessary dose modifications and/or termination, and to prevent impairments in patients' quality of life.

Adverse Event Profile of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the frontline standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. An updated toxicity profile of EGFR-TKIs proves valuable in guiding clinical decision making. This study comprehensively assessed the risk of EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) involving different systems/organs. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy with placebo or chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade adverse events (AEs) including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, and respiratory events was pooled for a meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on the control arm (placebo or chemotherapy) and individual EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) were conducted. Thirty-four randomized controlled trials comprising 15,887 patients were included. The pooled OR showed EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade dermatologic AEs including paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, and skin fissures, gastrointestinal AEs including abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, mouth ulceration, and stomatitis, hepatic AEs including elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and respiratory AEs including epistaxis, interstitial lung disease and rhinorrhea. Furthermore, a significantly increased risk of high-grade rash (OR 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.11, 12.00), diarrhea (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.44, 3.05), elevated alanine aminotransferase (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.71, 9.03), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.05, 9.92) and interstitial lung disease (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38, 4.01) was observed in patients receiving EGFR-TKIs. When stratified by individual EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib showed a significant association with all-grade and high-grade hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were associated with a significantly increased risk of various types of AEs. Clinicians should be vigilant about the risks of these EGFR-TKI-related AEs, particularly for severe hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease, to facilitate early detection and proper management.

Characterization of BTX-10908, a first-in-class, orally bioavailable SOS1 bifunctional degrader for the treatment of KRAS- and RTK-driven cancers.

e15192 Background: Despite early clinical responses of targeted therapeutics against specific nodes in the RTK-RAS-MAPK pathway, limitations in the depth and duration of efficacy occur due to the emergence of adaptive and acquired resistance mechanisms. Resistance can result from the removal of feedback inhibition to reactivate RTKs, on-target amplification and new mutations. The efficacy of these oncogene-targeted agents in the clinic could be improved by co-treatment with additional therapies that address either type of resistance mechanism. The RAS guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Son of Sevenless 1 (SOS1), represents an ideal target to enhance clinical potency of other pathway inhibitors for two reasons. In addition to mitigating inputs from upstream RTKs to downstream RAS proteins, SOS1’s activity is also regulated by ERK- and RSK-mediated negative feedback inhibition with upstream and downstream inhibitors alleviating this inhibition to reengage pathway activation. Methods: To address this need, we utilized our PRODEGY platform to generate orally bioavailable, Cereblon (CRBN)-based SOS1 bifunctional degrader, BTX-10908, for the treatment of KRAS- and RTK-driven tumors. Results: BTX-10908 demonstrated rapid and potent SOS1 degradation with <10nM DC50 and maximum degradation > 90%. Consistent with BTX-10908’s mechanism of action, SOS1 degradation required CRBN and the proteasome. Not only did it reduce active RAS levels, but BTX-10908 also inhibited downstream signaling proteins (pERK, pRSK, pS6) and lowered ERK-mediated transcripts in KRAS- and EGFR-mutant as well as MET amplified cell lines under anchorage-independent (3D) conditions. Additionally, drug washout experiments demonstrated prolonged suppression of pERK and ERK-regulated transcripts with SOS1 degradation whereas rebound occurred quicker with SOS1 inhibitors. BTX-10908 displayed CRBN- and SOS1-dependent antiproliferative activity with IC50 values ranging from 0.5-20nM. Notably, BTX-10908 was significantly more potent than the clinical SOS1 inhibitor at reducing pERK levels and cell viability in multiple KRAS- and RTK-driven cell lines. Oral administration of BTX-10908 resulted in dose-dependent SOS1 degradation and tumor growth inhibition in H358 (KRAS G12C) and H441 (KRAS G12V) xenografts. The combination of BTX-10908 with KRAS G12C inhibitors (Sotorasib, Adagrasib) and various RTK inhibitors (EGFR, Met, BCR-ABL, and FLT3) prevented pathway reactivation driven by these inhibitors resulting in synergistic effects in in vitro proliferation assays and enhanced tumor growth inhibition in KRAS-mutant xenograft models. Conclusions: Our developmental candidate, BTX-10908, displayed robust in vitro and in vivo activity supporting its further development for monotherapy and combination therapies of KRAS and RTK-driven cancers.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib and inetetamab in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoPICD study): A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

e12627 Background: Inetetamab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, alters the Fc region amino acids, which induces ADCC stronger than trastuzumab. Pyrotinib is a small chemical inhibitor of pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase. The globally recommended first-line neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer is chemotherapy and two large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, which have unsatisfactory benefits for 50% of patients. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of targeted medicines, specifically inetetamab and pyrotinib, in conjunction with chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: The trial was structured as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study. 143 treatment-naive HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer patients were planned for the trial. Eligible patients will be administered six cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, including carboplatin (AUC=6mg/mL×min, ivgtt), doxorubicin (75mg/m2, ivgtt), inetetamab (initial loading dosage of 8mg/kg, maintenance dose of 6mg/kg), and pyrotinib (400mg/day, po). The surgery was conducted after the neoadjuvant phase, subsequent to a one-year course of targeted therapy with inetetamab and pyrotinib. The primary endpoint of the study is the total pathologic complete response (tpCR). The secondary endpoints include event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), neurologic disease-free survival (NDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A cohort of 70 patients was enrolled between Nov. 27, 2021 and Feb. 1, 2024. Most patients completed the six-cycle neoadjuvant therapy with inetetamab, pyrotinib, and chemotherapy. The pathological findings of 49 patients who had radical surgery revealed that 65.3% (32/49, 95% CI, 0.515-0.791) of them achieved tpCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0). The initial subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with negative hormone receptors, the rate of tpCR was 80.0% (24/30, 95% CI, 64.8-95.2). Moreover, hormone receptor was statistically determined to be an independent factor influencing the effectiveness of the new treatment regimen ( p=0.032). The prevailing grade 3 or more severe adverse events included anemia (12.8%), diarrhea (10.0%), leukopenia (4.2%), liver dysfunction (4.2%) and renal dysfunction (4.2%). As of now, no treatment-related deaths have been documented. Conclusions: The ongoing study is actively enrolling participants. Preliminary findings from the study indicate that the combination of neoadjuvant inetetamab and pyrotinib with chemotherapy has demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness and manageable side effects. This offers a promising alternative for patients with locally advanced breast cancer that is HER2-positive. Clinical trial information: NCT06234137 .

Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors and FGFR alterations in the phase 2 RAGNAR trial.

10002 Background: Erdafitinib is an oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3 genetic alterations, as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, whose disease has progressed on or after ≥1 line of prior systemic therapy. Primary analysis of the RAGNAR study Broad Panel Cohort demonstrated tumor agnostic efficacy in pts with solid tumors harboring predefined FGFR mutations or fusions (Pant 2023). Here we report on Final Analysis of efficacy and safety results from the Pediatric Cohort of the RAGNAR study. Methods: Pediatric pts ≥6 years with advanced solid tumors and any FGFR mutation, fusion, or tandem duplication received oral erdafitinib. Starting doses were 8 mg, 5 mg, and 3 mg daily for ages > 15 years, 12 to < 15 years, and 6 to < 12 years, respectively, in 21-day cycles with possible individualized up-titration based on serum phosphate and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1 or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology [RANO]) by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator, duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 11 pts (median age 13 years; range, 6-16; 64% female) received erdafitinib. Median follow-up was 9.7 months at data cutoff. Histologies included low-grade glioma (LGG-6 pts); high-grade glioma (HGG-3 pts); soft tissue sarcoma (1 pt), and temporal neurocytoma (TNEURO-1 pt). 7, 1, and 3 pts had FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 alterations, respectively. 6, 4, and 1 pts had FGFR fusions, mutations, and tandem duplication, respectively. Pts had a median of 1 prior line of systemic treatment; 6 (55%) had prior radiotherapy. At data cutoff, 1 of 3 pts (33%) with HGG and an FGFR1-TACC1 fusion achieved a partial response based on investigator assessment with a response duration of 19.8 months. Investigator-assessed objective responses were not observed in the other tumor types. DCR and CBR were 100% in pts with LGG and 67% in pts with HGG. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included hyperphosphatemia (64%), diarrhea (64%), pain in extremity (45%), alanine transaminase increased (36%), nausea (36%), and onycholysis (27%). No central serous retinopathy events occurred; related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 4 (36%) pts, including 1 SAE of epiphysiolysis; there were no related TEAEs leading to death. Conclusions: In this small pediatric population comprising primarily refractory HGG and LGG with any FGFR alteration, erdafitinib demonstrated limited objective responses but promising disease control with acceptable safety. Clinical trial information: NCT04083976 .

A phase I/Ib study of the aurora kinase A inhibitor alisertib in combination with osimertinib in advanced osimertinib-resistant EGFR-mutated lung cancer.

8572 Background: The third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib is effective for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), however treatment resistance invariably occurs. We previously identified Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) activation as a mechanism of resistance to osimertinib. Alisertib is an oral, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of AURKA. We evaluated the combination of alisertib with osimertinib in a phase I/Ib study of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated LUAD who experienced disease progression on prior treatment with osimertinib monotherapy. Methods: 21 total patients were treated in an open-label, single-center phase I trial (NCT04085315). 10 patients were treated in a 3+3 dose escalation phase with alisertib using an intermittent dosing strategy of 30 mg (n = 6) or 40 mg (n = 4) twice daily (BID) on days (d) 1-3, 8-11, and 15-17 of a 28-day cycle in combination with osimertinib 80 mg daily. 11 additional patients were treated at the 30 mg alisertib intermittent dosing schedule in combination with osimertinib 80 mg daily in a Phase Ib dose expansion. Primary endpoints were safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the alisertib and osimertinib combination. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria, depth of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR) for at least 12 weeks, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 21 patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated LUAD (76.1% exon 19 deletion; 14.3% L858R; 9.5 % L861Q) who had progressed on osimertinib were enrolled. 10 (47.6%) patients had received only first-line osimertinib, while 11 (52.3%) had received ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy. Common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (42.9%), anemia (42.9%), and diarrhea (38.1%). 2 patients had dose limiting toxicities from grade 4 neutropenia at the alisertib 40mg BID dose level. 2 patients had serious adverse events related to the study drugs, including grade 3 constipation and grade 4 anemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Intermittent alisertib 30 mg BID with osimertinib 80 mg daily was the MTD and R2PD. ORR for all enrolled patients was 9.5% (95% CI: 1.2% to 30.4%), DCR was 81% (95% CI: 58.1% to 94.6%), and median DoR was -4 % (95% CI: -15% to 10%). The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.7 – 13.2 months) and median OS was 23.5 months (95% CI: 11.9 months – NR). Conclusions: Intermittent dosing of alisertib 30 mg BID in combination with osimertinib 80 mg daily demonstrated no dose limiting toxicities and was identified as the RP2D. While ORR was < 10%, DCR was > 80% and the median PFS was 5.5 months. These results are comparable to other emerging therapies for patients with advanced osimertinib resistant EGFR-mutated LUAD and warrants further exploration. Clinical trial information: NCT04085315 .

The patient outcomes with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment.

e20619 Background: As a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), aumolertinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a well-tolerated toxicity profile to gefitinib in front-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the AENEAS trial. However, the real-world impact of aumolertinib in the first-line treatment on patients' HRQoL still remains unclear. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations treated with aumolertinib 110 mg daily in the first-line treatment were prospectively enrolled and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and EORTC Quality of Life lung cancer-specific module (QLQ-LC13) information were collected. Efficacy evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 was also recorded here. Prespecified key symptoms were cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, sore mouth or tongue, dysphagia, hair loss, tingling hands or feet, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain and pain of other sites. Results: Totally, 33 patients in the first-line treatment were included and 23 patients had efficacy information up to Jan 2024. The median follow-up time was 264 days (interval: 36-491 days). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 65.2% and 91.3%, respectively. All the patients haven’t reached the time to deterioration and the progression free survival(PFS) and overall survival is not reach. EORTC QLQ-LC30 showed general health status scale and functional scales increased and symptom scales decreased during aumolertinib treatment. Symptom scales assessed by EORTC QLQ-LC13 showed cough, sore mouth or tongue, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain and pain of other sites, were improved significantly after aumolertinib treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusions: General health status, functional status and key symptoms improved from baseline in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment. The ORR and DCR in our study was comparable in those showed the AENEAS trial.

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab with afatinib for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (neoCHANCE-1): An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.

6073 Background: For patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), even receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, those remain at high risk of recurrence or metastasis. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been used in HNSCC, but provides only modest pathological response. Given single agent activity and unique mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), we aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with EGFR inhibition in locally advanced HNSCC. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial was done at a a tertiary hospital in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had resectable HNSCC disease, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, had at least one measurable target lesion according to the RECIST 1.1, had no prior antitumor therapy for HNSCC. Patients received neoadjuvant treatment with intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) on the first day of each 3 week, with totally two cycles and orally afatinib (30 mg) starting on the first treatment day and ending on the day before surgery, with totally six weeks, and then patients proceeded to receive surgical resection. The primary endpoint was major pathological response, defined as the presence of 10% or less residual viable tumour at the time of surgery. Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled completed the neoadjuvant therapy. Eight of 23 evaluable patients exhibited a major pathological response (MPR) (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16%—57%), of which four had a complete pathological response of primary tumor (17%, 95%CI, 5%—39%). The overall response rate was 48% (12/25, 95%CI: 28%—69%) and disease control rate was 100% (25/25, 95%CI: 86%—100%). Common grade 3—4 adverse events included diarrhea (5/25 [20%]), hypokalemia (4/25 [16%]) and rash (3/25 [12%]). No treatment related fatalities were observed. Immunologically, post-neoadjuvant treatment demonstrated increased CD3, CD8, and CD56 expression within the tumor microenvironment. The increase of CD8 and CD56 expression level was significant higher in patients achieving MPR, along with elevated circulatory NK cells at baseline, compared to those in patients achieving non-MPR. Conclusions: This study underscores encouraging antitumor activity, manageable toxicity profile and promising immune activation elicited by neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus afatinib for HNSCC, which deserves further assessment. Clinical trial information: NCT05517330 .

A multicenter real-world study on the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

e13120 Background: Anlotinib is a multi-targeted small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor that inhibits angiogenesis. There is only one phase II study on the use of anlotinib in advanced breast cancer (MBC). Therefore, this study aims to analyze its efficacy and safety in the treatment of BC in the real world. It has been approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. There is limited research on the use of anlotinib in advanced breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of MBC patients who received anlotinib treatment at four domestic centers from January 2021 to December 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze PFS and OS, and Cox regression model was used to analyze the hazard ratios (HRs) of anlotinib-based treatment on PFS and OS in different subgroups of patients. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 153 MBC patients receiving anlotinib-based treatment were included from four centers. The median age was 51 years (range: 22-76), and the median number of prior lines of therapy was 3. The median PFS was 7.7 months (range: 5.2-10.1 months), and the median OS was 28.0 months (range: 21.4-34.9 months). The median ORR and DCR were 19.6% and 60.1%, respectively. The ORR for HR+/HER2- and triple-negative breast cancer patients was 11.6% and 28.8%, respectively, DCR for HR+/HER2- and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients was 55.8% and 59.6%, respectively. The median PFS was 9.0 months (range: 6.0-11.9 months) for HR+/HER2- patients and 5.3 months (range: 3.5-7.0 months) for TNBC patients, while the median OS was 33.0 months (range: 24.4-41.5 months) and 14.0 months (range: 9.5-18.4 months), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, age <60 years, initial stage IV disease, Ki67≤60%, and treatment with PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies-based regimen were associated with PFS benefit. ECOG <2 and treatment with PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies-based regimen were associated with prolonged OS. Among the 31 patients with brain metastases receiving anlotinib treatment, 11 had active brain metastases and 20 had stable brain metastases. The median PFS was 8.0 months. The intracranial ORR was 12.9%, and the intracranial DCR was 61.3%. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Grade I/II adverse reactions included hand-foot syndrome (22.2%) and fatigue (19.6%), while grade III/IV adverse reactions included fatigue (6.5%) and decreased neutrophil count (5.2%). Three patients required dose reduction due to intolerable adverse reactions, and nine patients discontinued treatment. Conclusions: Anlotinib demonstrates good antitumor activity and safety in the treatment of MBC. When combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, it can improve PFS and OS without significantly increasing toxicity. In particular, it shows promising intracranial ORR and PFS in patients with brain metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT04541420 .

Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in adults with breast cancer and prespecified fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations in the phase 2 open-label, single-arm RAGNAR trial.

1088 Background: Erdafitinib is an oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3 genetic alterations, as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, whose disease has progressed on or after ≥1 line of prior systemic therapy. The primary analysis results from the RAGNAR study demonstrated tumor agnostic efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors with predefined FGFR alterations after failure of standard therapies (Pant 2023). Here, we report results on patients with breast cancer in the RAGNAR study. Methods: Patients with breast cancer and prespecified FGFR1-4 alterations (mutations or fusions) who had documented disease progression after exhausting standard therapies received oral erdafitinib 8 mg daily with optional up-titration until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate by Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: At data cutoff (median follow up, 30.3 months), 16 patients with breast cancer received erdafitinib. Median age was 54 y (range 37-74); all (100%) patients were female and had visceral metastases. Patients had a median of 5 prior lines of systemic therapies (range 2-12); one (6%) patient had responded to the last line of therapy. Ten (63%) patients had FGFR fusions, and 6 (38%) had FGFR mutations. Mutations of TP53 and PIK3CA were found in 6/16 patients. Objective response rate and disease control rate by IRC were 31% (95% CI 11-59) and 69% (95% CI 41-89); objective response rate and disease control rate by investigator were 38% (95% CI 15-65) and 69% (95% CI 41-89), respectively. Median time to onset of response was 1.4 months. Responses were observed in patients with both FGFR2 fusions and with FGFR2/3 mutations. Median duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival were 6.9 months, 5.7 months, and 8.9 months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included stomatitis (81%), diarrhea (69%), and hyperphosphatemia (69%), dry mouth (63%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (44%). Six (38%) patients had serious AEs. No patients discontinued erdafitinib due to AEs. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Erdafitinib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer and prespecified FGFR alterations. Safety data were consistent with the erdafitinib safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04083976 .

FGFR3 alterations (FGFRalt) in patients (pts) who develop locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), and their association with tumor subtype and clinical outcomes in pts treated with erdafitinib (erda) vs. pembrolizumab (pembro).

4578 Background: Erda, an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor is approved to treat adult pts with locally advanced or mUC with susceptible FGFR3alt, whose disease progressed on or after at least one line of prior systemic therapy. In superficial and surgically resectable UC, FGFRalt has been shown to be highly associated with luminal subtype characterized by expression of luminal markers, low expression of basal markers and with immune cold / poor immune infiltration. In a randomized open-label phase III THOR study (Cohort 2), erda showed improvement in objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to pembro, with no significant improvement in overall survival (OS). Exploration of subtypes in a large cohort of mUC pts has not been done and so a molecular analysis was undertaken to further understand the clinical findings. Methods: All available tumors from pts enrolled in Cohort 2 ( FGFRalt positive; N = 201) and a subset of FGFR wildtype (N = 116) were used to perform whole transcriptome RNA sequencing, where 152 and 84, respectively, passed quality control. The consensus single-sample classifier was applied to the RNAseq data to determine molecular subtypes. Tumor subtypes was correlated with treatment response to erda or pembro, PFS and OS. Results: Molecular classification of tumors identified a significant proportion of luminal-papillary (LumP) subtype in the tumors harboring FGFRalt compared to FGFR WT (78.3% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001) vs. other subtypes: basal/squamous (Ba/Sq; 11.2% vs. 31.0%), stroma-rich (6.6% vs. 10.7%), neuroendocrine-like (0% vs. 2.4%), luminal-unstable (3.3% vs. 17.9%) and luminal-unspecified (0.7% vs. 1.2%), respectively. Consistently, FGFRalt type showed differential association with subtypes: 3.2% of fusions and 14.1% of mutations were detected in Ba/Sq subtype while 74.2% and 79.3%, respectively, were detected in LumP. Clinical outcomes evaluated within LumP subset showed a significant improvement in ORR of erda-treated vs. pembro-treated pts (41.7 vs. 19.7%; p = 0.01), which was consistent with the intent to treat (ITT) population (40.0% vs. 21.6%). Numerical improvement were observed in PFS in the LumP subtype between erda vs. pembro (5.5 vs 2.7 months) compared with the ITT population (4.4 vs 2.7). However, the benefit of erda over pembro in the LumP subtype did not translate to OS (10.9 vs. 12.9 months), similar to the ITT population (10.9 vs. 11.1 months). Conclusions: A significant overlap was identified between genomic selection of FGFRalt and the LumP subtype. Clinical outcomes based on transcriptomic analyses were consistent with those observed in the ITT population. These findings warrant further understanding of LumP tumors and association to treatment response. Clinical trial information: NCT03390504 .

Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in adults with NSCLC and prespecified fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations in the phase 2 open-label, single-arm RAGNAR trial.

8515 Background: Erdafitinib is an oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3 alterations, as determined by FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, who have progressed during or after ≥1 line of prior systemic therapy. Primary analysis results from the RAGNAR study demonstrated tumor agnostic efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors with predefined FGFR alterations after failure of standard therapies (Pant 2023). Here we report results on patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the RAGNAR study. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC with prespecified FGFR1-4 alterations (mutations/fusions) and with documented disease progression after exhausting standard therapies were included. Patients with other targetable alterations (eg, EGFR, ALK, ROS1) were excluded. Patients received oral erdafitinib until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate by independent review committee. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: At data cutoff (median survival follow-up of 23.7 months), 23 patients with NSCLC received erdafitinib. Median age was 63 years (range 50-79); 22 (96%) had metastases. Patients had a median of 2 prior lines of systemic therapies (range 1-7; 48% had 3+ prior lines); only 2 (9%) patients had responded to their prior line of therapy. Fourteen patients (61%) had squamous and 9 (39%) non-squamous histology; 13 patients (57%) had FGFRfusions and 10 (43%) had FGFR mutations. Three patients had CDKN2Aand 3 patients had PIK3CA co-alterations. Objective response rate by independent review committee was 26% (95% CI 10-48); disease control rate was 74% (95% CI 52-90). Median time to onset of response was 1.5 months. Responses were observed in 21% (3/14) of patients with squamous; 33% (3/9) with non-squamous histology, 29% (2/7) of patients with FGFR2, 25% (4/16) with FGFR3alterations, and in 20% (2/10) of patients with FGFR mutations and 31% (4/13) with fusions. Median duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.6 months, 4.1 months, and 10.5 months, respectively. Most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (65%), stomatitis (61%), dry mouth (44%), hyperphosphatemia (65%), dry skin (30%), and fatigue (22%); 6 (26%) had serious AEs; 2 (9%) discontinued erdafitinib due to AEs. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Erdafitinib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in pre-treated patients with NSCLC and pre-specified FGFR alterations. Safety data were consistent with erdafitinib safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04083976 .

Clinical efficacy of pyrotinib combined with stereotactic radiosurgery in HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

e13017 Background: Up to 50% of patients with breast cancer (BC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive present with disease progression in brain metastases (BM). Pyrotinib, an oral irreversible pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown efficacy in active central nervous system(CNS) metastases. However, clinical efficacy of pyrotinib combining with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in BCBM is unclear. Methods: This retrospective, observational study collected data from 52 HER2+ BC patients with brain metastasis who received pyrotinib-based therapy in Guangdong Sanjiu brain hospital from 2019 to 2023. Among these patients, 36 received pyrotinib-based therapy combining with SRS concurrently, or within 1 months. Age, stage at diagnosis, dates of BM, primary tumor subtypes, prior systemic therapy, CNS-directed local therapy, the objective response and survival status were collected. The assessment of adverse effects was based on CTCAE 4.0. Results: 34 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 51.5). With a median follow-up duration of 19.6 months, 1 patient (0.3%) achieved CR, while 27 patients (79.4%) had PR, resulting in an ORR of 82.3%. The median CNS PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI, 4.9-21.7). Median overall survival (OS) was 22.6 months (95% CI, 17.5-27.6). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (6 [17.6%]). Conclusions: Our results suggest that pyrotinib combining with SRS is associated with promising efficacy and a satisfactory safety profile for Her2+ breast cancer brain metastases.

BGB-A317-212: A multicenter, open-label, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab in combination with lenvatinib in patients with selected solid tumors.

2610 Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated promising efficacy in several advanced solid tumors. However, some patients (pts) do not respond or develop resistance to tislelizumab monotherapy. Lenvatinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFR alpha, KIT, and RET, has shown a potential synergistic effect with anti-PD-1 therapy. Here, we report the primary results of a phase II study evaluating the combination of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in pts with solid tumors (NCT05014828). Methods: Pts with histologically/cytologically confirmed selected solid tumors, naïve to lenvatinib and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 therapies were enrolled. Part 1 (safety run-in) determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of lenvatinib in combination with tislelizumab 400 mg IV every 6 weeks. In Part 2 (expansion), pts received lenvatinib at the RP2D from Part 1 (20 mg orally/day) plus tislelizumab per the Part 1 regimen until disease progression, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoints were safety and RP2D determination (Part 1) and overall response rate (ORR; Part 2). Results: At data cutoff (Oct 20, 2023; median follow-up 12.1 months [mo; renal cell carcinoma, RCC]; 10.8 mo [head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, HNSCC]; 14.8 mo [gastric cancer, GC], and 22.0 mo [non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC]), 58 pts were treated in Part 2 (RCC, n=23; HNSCC, n=27; GC, n=3; NSCLC, n=5), 6 of whom were also included in Part 1. The ORR was 66.7% in pts with RCC, 33.3% (HNSCC), 33.3% (GC), and 20.0% (NSCLC). Median duration of response (mDoR) was 18.5 mo and 9.6 mo in pts with NSCLC and HNSCC, respectively; not estimable (NE) for RCC and GC (Table). No new safety signals were identified; grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 78.3%, 59.3%, 33.3% and 60.0%, of pts with RCC, HNSCC, GC, and NSCLC, respectively (Table). Conclusions: Tislelizumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety profile and showed preliminary antitumor activity in pts with selected tumor types. Longer follow-up is needed to further investigate the potential of this combination to benefit pts with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05014828 .[Table: see text]

Influence of TP53 mutation on efficacy and survival in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

TP53 comutation is related to poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. However, there is limited study focusing on the structural influence of TP53 mutation on third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and molecular data of patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs in two independent cohorts. A total of 117 patients from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) and 141 patients from the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE database were included. In the SYSUCC cohort, TP53 comutations were found in 59 patients (50.4%) and were associated with poor median progress-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). The additional subtype analysis found that TP53 mutation in the alpha-helix region had shorter mOS compared with those with TP53 mutations in other regions in the SYSUCC cohort (mOS, 12.2 vs. 21.7 months; p=0.027). Similar findings were confirmed in the GENIE cohort. Specifically, the presence of TP53 mutation in the alpha-helix region was an independent negative predictive factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.05(1.01-4.18), p=0.048] and OS [HR 3.62(1.60-8.17), p=0.002] in the SYSUCC cohort. TP53 mutation in alpha-helix region was related to inferior clinical outcomes in patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Strategies and Recent Advances on Improving Efficient Antitumor of Lenvatinib Based on Nanoparticle Delivery System.

Lenvatinib (LVN) is a potentially effective multiple-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer. Nonetheless, poor pharmacokinetic properties including poor water solubility and rapid metabolic, complex tumor microenvironment, and drug resistance have impeded its satisfactory therapeutic efficacy. This article comprehensively reviews the uses of nanotechnology in LVN to improve antitumor effects. With the characteristic of high modifiability and loading capacity of the nano-drug delivery system, an active targeting approach, controllable drug release, and biomimetic strategies have been devised to deliver LVN to target tumors in sequence, compensating for the lack of passive targeting. The existing applications and advances of LVN in improving therapeutic efficacy include improving longer-term efficiency, achieving higher efficiency, combination therapy, tracking and diagnosing application and reducing toxicity. Therefore, using multiple strategies combined with photothermal, photodynamic, and immunoregulatory therapies potentially overcomes multi-drug resistance, regulates unfavorable tumor microenvironment, and yields higher synergistic antitumor effects. In brief, the nano-LVN delivery system has brought light to the war against cancer while at the same time improving the antitumor effect. More intelligent and multifunctional nanoparticles should be investigated and further converted into clinical applications in the future.

Increase in blood pressure in patients with metastatic kidney cancer treated with combination checkpoint inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

e24128 Background: The combination therapy of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) is considered a first line treatment option for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). TKI-induced hypertension is a well-known potential side effect with VEGFR-TKIs however little is known about the real-world increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with and without underlying hypertension treated with this combination therapy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed that included patients with metastatic ccRCC who were treated at the University of Florida Health Cancer Center between June 2019 and September 2022 who received treatment with the combination of an ICI and VEGFR-TKI. The data collected included history of hypertension, patients use of anti-hypertensive therapy at baseline, SBP and DBP prior to initiation of therapy and at approximately one month after initiation of treatment. Results: We identified a total of 29 patients who met the inclusion criteria for our study. The median age was 68 years old (IQR 61-72) while 25 patients (86%) were male and 4 (14%) were females. There were 27 patients (93%) who were treated with axitinib with pembrolizumab, while 1 (3%) was treated with cabozantinib with nivolumab, and 1 (3%) was treated with lenvatinib with pembrolizumab. Out of the 29 patients, 11 (38%) did not have hypertension prior to therapy while 18 (62%) did have baseline hypertension and were receiving at least one anti-hypertensive treatment. In those patients without baseline hypertension, the median baseline SBP was 113 and the median SBP after one month of treatment was 144 (p = 0.01). Conversely, those patients with baseline hypertension, the median baseline SBP was 122 and median SBP after one month of treatment was 148 (p = 0.003). In those without hypertension at baseline, the mean SBP increase after one month was 27.3% while in those with baseline hypertension the mean increase in SBP of 17.0%. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in a real-world population of patients with metastatic ccRCC there is a statistically significant elevation of both SBP and DBP when treated with the combination of an ICI and VEGFR-TKI and that in those patients without baseline hypertension and not on anti-hypertensive therapy at baseline, there is a more pronounced increase in blood pressure. This data should reinforce the need to have close monitoring of SBP and DBP during therapy, regardless of whether the patient has underlying hypertension or not, and may help guide anti-hypertensive therapy during kidney cancer treatment.

Pyrotinib in HER2-altered advanced salivary gland carcinomas: Analysis of two cohorts from an exploratory study.

6108 Background: The HER2 altered in a subset of salivary gland cancers (SGCs). Pyrotinib is an oral irreversible pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting HER1, HER2, and HER4. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-amplified/overexpressed/mutated advanced SGCs, including recurrent/metastatic(R/M) and locally advanced (LA) patients with high-risk of recurrence. Methods: R/M and high-risk LA SGCs with HER2-alteration were enrolled. Pyrotinib (400 mg) was given orally once daily. In LA cohort, pyrotinib were given as adjuvant therapy after standard surgery and postoperative radiation. Results: Between August 2019 and August 2023, 18 patients were enrolled (10 in R/M cohort and 8 in LA cohort). In R/M cohort, the median age was 58.5 years, and all patients were grade III. The ORR was 90%, including 2 CRs, 7 PRs and 1PD; median DOR was 5.7 months (range: 3.1-13.7) and median PFS was 7.6 months (range: 2.7-16.8). In LA cohort, the median age was 59.0 years, and all patients but one were grade III. All patients but one had T4 disease; 5 patients had N3 and 2 had N2b disease; 5 patients had ENE and 5 patients had positive margin. With a median follow up 21.3 months, only 3 patients experienced recurrence, and one patient died due to non-tumor reasons. The estimated 2-years PFS and 2-years OS were 75% and 100%. The most common adverse event was diarrhea, which occurred in 11/18 (61.1%) patients and 3/18 (16.7%) were grade III. Conclusions: Pyrotinib showed promising antitumor activity in recurrent/metastatic HER2-altered SGCs, and had a potential to prolong survival outcome as adjuvant treatment in LA patients setting, which needs further randomized studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05087706 .

Dermatologic adverse events in EGFR-TKIs: A real-world analysis.

e20572 Background: Dermatologic adverse events (DAEs) affect a significant number of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). While many DAEs have been identified during clinical trials and included in FDA drug labels, patients have raised concerns about experiencing unexpected DAEs. This study reviews the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to identify DAEs in EGFR TKIs approved in NSCLC that are not included in drug labels. Methods: FAERS was queried for DAEs between 2003 – 2023 for osimertinib, afatinib, ertlotinib, gefitinib and mobocertinib. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated to compare DAEs between these EGFR-TKIs and all other drugs in the database. DAEs were considered statistically significant if the lower limit of the ROR 95% confidence interval (CI) was > 1 and if there were ≥ 3 reported adverse reactions. Results: 67,480 adverse events were reported for the 5 EGFR-TKIs studied. DAEs constituted 30.3% (20,426) of all adverse event reports. We identified skin (skin fissures, eczema, lip swelling, and skin infection), nail (onychalgia and onychomadesis), and hair (abnormal hair growth and hair disorder) DAEs not previously included in EGFR-TKI drug labels. RORs with 95% CIs are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Real-world FAERS data complements clinical trial data in identifying specific DAEs affecting NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs. Our findings highlight DAEs that were previously not described, aiding clinicians in educating patients about side effects and giving patients a more nuanced understanding of what to expect before undergoing treatment. [Table: see text]