Receptor Pairs Research Articles

Molecular mechanisms regulating platelet clearance and thrombopoietin production

The human body produces and removes 1011 platelets daily to maintain a normal steady‐state platelet count. Platelet production must be tightly regulated to avoid spontaneous bleeding if counts are low (thrombocytopenia) or arterial occlusion and organ damage if counts are high (thrombocytosis). Recent studies have highlighted the role of glycan modifications on platelet surface proteins in mediating platelet clearance. Platelets undergoing cold storage lose sialic acid and β‐galactose. Following transfusion, cold‐stored platelets are cleared via hepatic Ashwell–Morell receptor (AMR) and the macrophage (Kupffer cell) αMβ2 integrin lectin domain. New data point to the fact that platelets surface loses sialic acid during their circulatory lifetime, suggesting a novel platelet in vivo clearance mechanism via the AMR. Thrombopoietin (TPO) is the primary regulator of platelet production, supporting the survival, proliferation and differentiation of the platelet precursors, bone marrow megakaryocytes. Although it is clear that hepatocytes are the primary source of TPO, the mechanisms regulating circulating TPO levels have been subject to discussion for decades. Two major models for TPO regulation have been proposed. In one model, hepatic TPO production is constitutive and TPO serum levels are maintained solely by its uptake and metabolism by the TPO receptor c‐Mpl on platelets and megakaryocytes. In another model, hepatic TPO production is regulated. However, the physiological ligand–receptor pair capable of regulating steady‐state TPO production remains unclear. In this review, mechanisms of glycan–lectin‐mediated platelet clearance and TPO production will be discussed.

Evidence for limited D1 and D2 receptor coexpression and colocalization within the dorsal striatum of the neonatal mouse

The striatum is the major input nucleus of the basal ganglia involved in reward processing, goal-directed behaviors, habit learning, and motor control. The striatum projects to the basal ganglia output nuclei via the "direct" and "indirect" pathways, which can be distinguished by their projection fields and their opposing effects on behavior. In adult animals, the functional opposition is modulated by the differential actions of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors (D1R, D2R), the expression of which is largely separated between these pathways. To determine whether a similar degree of separation exists earlier in development, we used dual-label immunohistochemistry to map dorsal-striatal D1R and D2R expression at the promoter level in postnatal day 0 (PD0) Drd1a-tdTomato/Drd2-GFP BAC transgenic mice, and at the receptor level by costaining for native D1R and D2R in wildtype (WT) PD0 animals. To assess for potential molecular interactions between D1R and D2R we also employed a recently developed proximity-ligation assay (PLA). Limited coexpression and colocalization of the D1R and D2R proteins was found in clusters of neurons endemic to the "patch" compartment as identified by costaining with tyrosine hydroxylase, but not outside these clusters. Moreover, in contrast to our recent findings where we failed to detect a D1R-D2R PLA signal in the adult striatum, in PD0 striatum we did identify a clear PLA signal for this pair of receptors. This colocalization at close proximity points to a possible role for D1R/D2R-mediated crosstalk in early striatal ontogeny.

Identification of LY2510924, a novel cyclic peptide CXCR4 antagonist that exhibits antitumor activities in solid tumor and breast cancer metastatic models.

Emerging evidence demonstrates that stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and CXCR4, a chemokine and chemokine receptor pair, play important roles in tumorigenesis. In this report, we describe a small cyclic peptide, LY2510924, which is a potent and selective CXCR4 antagonist currently in phase II clinical studies for cancer. LY2510924 specifically blocked SDF-1 binding to CXCR4 with IC50 value of 0.079 nmol/L, and inhibited SDF-1-induced GTP binding with Kb value of 0.38 nmol/L. In human lymphoma U937 cells expressing endogenous CXCR4, LY2510924 inhibited SDF-1-induced cell migration with IC50 value of 0.26 nmol/L and inhibited SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated intracellular signaling. LY2510924 exhibited a concentration-dependent inhibition of SDF-1-stimulated phospho-ERK and phospho-Akt in tumor cells. Biochemical and cellular analyses revealed that LY2510924 had no apparent agonist activity. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggested that LY2510924 had acceptable in vivo stability and a pharmacokinetic profile similar to a typical small-molecular inhibitor in preclinical species. LY2510924 showed dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth in human xenograft models developed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, lung, and colon cancer cells that express functional CXCR4. In MDA-MB-231, a breast cancer metastatic model, LY2510924 inhibited tumor metastasis by blocking migration/homing process of tumor cells to the lung and by inhibiting cell proliferation after tumor cell homing. Collectively, the preclinical data support further investigation of LY2510924 in clinical studies for cancer.

Mechanical matching between a ligand and receptor.

Interactions between ligands and receptors and subsequent "locking" must involve some resistance to unbinding, manifesting itself as an interaction force. At body temperature, spontaneous unbinding will occur, however, external forces are required to accelerate this process. Bearing in mind the potential forces that the receptor-ligand complex is likely to be subjected to in a biological environment, it might be hypothesised that there is some mechanical matching between the receptor and ligand. To test this hypothesis, various receptor and ligand pairs were unfolded in their entirety in order to determine their total unfolding force. In this way, the total force to unfold the protein could be determined, allowing a comparison between ligand and receptor pairs. The interest of this work is to examine the interaction between five proteins and a mica surface by AFM without any modification to preserve the natural elastic properties of the protein molecules during the force measurements. The results showed a mechanical matching between GP120 (ligand) and CD4 (receptor) when analysing the total force required to unfold the same number of domains or events shown by the force distance curves of these proteins.

Mechanisms of Autoinhibition and Dimerization of the EGF Receptor Family

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB) family of receptor tyrosine kinases initiates cell signaling in response to growth factors, thereby regulating cell growth, migration and division. Four members comprise this family (EGFR/HER1/ErbB1, ErbB2, ErbB3 and ErbB4), and activating mutations in each protein are associated with severe cancers of the lung, colon, head and neck.ErbB proteins consist of an extracellular ligand binding domain, a single transmembrane alpha-helix, and an intracellular kinase domain. Structural and functional studies of isolated domains of the EGFR family have revealed details of the complex mechanism of receptor regulation. Somewhat lacking, however, is our knowledge of the full-length receptor in its native membrane environment. Ligand binding is known to promote receptor dimerization and activation, but it is unclear how receptor behavior is altered by the two-dimensional environment of the plasma membrane. In particular, the mechanism by which receptor domains cooperate to transmit signals across the membrane is not well understood.Toward this end, we employed quantitative FRET microscopy to study dimerization of EGFR family proteins in plasma membrane-derived vesicles. This method measures FRET efficiency as a function of two-dimensional receptor concentration in the membrane. We investigated four receptor pairs: homodimers of ErbB1, ErbB2, and ErbB3, as well as heterodimers containing ErbB2 and ErbB3. We first observe that the isolated transmembrane (TM) domains have an intrinsic propensity to associate. Next, we demonstrate that the extracellular domains function to prevent TM domain interactions. Finally, we show that the intracellular domains alone are sufficient to drive receptor dimerization in the absence of ligand. Dimerization occurs in a concentration-dependent manner, and ligand shifts this threshold to low receptor concentration. Importantly, both of these dimerization events occur over a physiologically relevant concentration range.

Brdt Bromodomains Inhibitors and Other Modern Means of Male Contraception.

Compared to efficient and secure female contraception, a vasectomy and condoms are the only options for men. The choice of male contraceptive methods is limited, so contraception mainly rests on the shoulders of women. Several concepts are considered: testosterone administration--inhibiting pituitary secretion of lutropin (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), progestogen--affecting the secretion of gonadotropin and gonadoliberin (GnRH) antagonists. New potential targets for non-hormonal male contraception were discovered: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDHS)--specific to male germ cells and voltage-gated cation channel (CatSper). Both are responsible for sperm motility. Drugs such as thioridazine used in schizophrenia treatment and phenoxybenzamine (antihypertensive activity) exhibit a contraceptive effect. Similar action exhibits an analogue of lonidamine--adjudin and an antagonist of retinoic acid receptors (BMS-189453). Researchers are working on a contraceptive vaccine, whose active ingredient is epididymal protease inhibitor (Eppin). Another promising method acts by blocking Bromodomain testis-specific proteins (Brdt) involved in the process of spermatogenesis. JQ1-the Brdt inhibitor causes reversible infertility without affecting the endocrine signaling pathways. A recent discovery of Juno as the binding partner for Izumo1 identifies these proteins as the cell-surface receptor pair, essential for gamete recognition and this interaction can be inhibited by an anti-Juno monoclonal antibody. Our review shows that the situation of men can change and investigators are close to the optimal solution. In the near future men will be able to choose the best contraceptive suited to their needs.

High expression of CXCR3 is an independent prognostic factor in glioblastoma patients that promotes an invasive phenotype.

Chemokines are a superfamily of small heparin-binding cytokines that induce leukocytes to migrate to sites of inflammation or injury through interacting with specific transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors. Currently, attention is focused on chemokine/chemokine receptor pairs and their ability to promote tumor cell migration and angiogenesis. The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is involved in tumor metastasis and is used as a prognostic biomarker. However, its relationship with the clinicopathological features of primary glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) and its potential prognostic value have yet to be investigated. Here, we report that high CXCR3 expression conferred poor survival in pGBM patients. Further analysis showed that CXCR3 served as an independent prognostic biomarker for pGBM patients. In addition, functional assays indicated that CXCR3 induced glioma cell invasion. Therefore, this evidence indicates CXCR3 is an independent prognostic factor for pGBM patients and promotes an invasive phenotype, which suggests a new potential biotarget for glioblastoma multiforme therapy.

Zoledronic Acid Induces the Proliferation of Human Cord Blood Gamma Delta T Cells Ex Vivo

Cord blood (CB) T cells are known to be naïve cells, but can be activated to respond similar to adult peripheral blood (PB) T cells. Reports indicate that culture with aminobisphosphonate (NBP) stimulates CB gamma delta T cell proliferation ex vivo, specifically the TCRγ9δ2 subset, which has been extensively studied in PB gamma delta T cells. As CB gamma delta T cells are not well described, we compared CB gamma delta T cell proliferation, phenotype and genotype to PB gamma delta T cells when culturing cells with the NBP, Zometa (zoledronic acid), and IL-2. Fourteen days in culture resulted in significant fold increase in the proliferation of gamma delta T cells and in the percent of lymphocytes in both sample types. PB gamma delta T cells proliferated more robustly than CB with a 288.60 versus 21.32 fold increase, respectively. Additionally, in freshly isolated samples, CB gamma delta T cells comprised an average of 1.404% of the lymphocyte population, which was similar to PB gamma delta T cells, with an average of 2.319%. However, by day 14, PB gamma delta T cells increased to 70.15% of lymphocytes whereas CB gamma delta T cells increased to 12.49%. Phenotypically, both CB and PB had similar percent of CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ gamma delta T cell memory subsets in freshly isolated samples. Following culture, PB gamma delta T cells were mostly CD45RO+ memory cells, with significantly fewer CD45RA+ naïve cells, whereas more CB gamma delta T cells were of the intermediate CD45RA+CD45RO+ subset. Further phenotypic analysis of the memory subsets indicated that cultured PB gamma delta T cells were either effector memory cells (CD27-CD45RA-) or central memory cells (CD27+CD45RA-), while CB gamma delta T cells were mostly naïve (CD27+CD45RA+). The cytokines secreted by these cells were also assessed and the culture of PB and CB gamma delta T cells resulted in differing cytokine secretion profiles. After 14 days of culture, PB gamma delta T cells secreted more IFNγ and TNFα, while CB gamma delta T cells secreted more IL-10 and RANTES. We also examined TCRγ9 and TCRδ2 phenotypic expression and found that the TCRγ9δ2 was a common clone in freshly isolated PB gamma delta T cells, which predominated after 14 days in culture. However, while the TCRγ9δ2 variant was expressed in CB gamma delta T cells, it was low before and after culture, suggesting that Zometa may not stimulate gamma delta T cells in CB the same as PB. As limited TCRγδ phenotypic reagents are available, we developed a single cell PCR assay for genotypic analysis of the TCRγδ repertoire. PCR analysis suggests that the TCRγδ repertoire is diverse in both samples, yet TCRγ9δ2 is most prevalent. Further analysis of the variant subsets is warranted and may give insight into how each of these receptor pairings affects function. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Identifying modulators of CXC receptors 3 and 4 with tailored selectivity using multi-target docking.

The G protein-coupled receptors of the C-X-C subfamily form a group among the chemokine receptors whose endogenous ligands are peptides with a common Cys-X-Cys motif. The CXC chemokine receptors 3 and 4 (CXCR3, CXCR4), which are investigated in this study, are linked to severe diseases such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, and HIV infections. Of particular interest, this receptor pair potentially forms a target for a polypharmacological drug treatment. Considering known ligands from public databases, such dual binders have not been identified yet. We therefore applied large-scale docking to the structure of CXCR4 and a homology model of CXCR3 with the goal to predict such dual binders, as well as compounds selective for either one of the receptors. Using signaling and biochemical assays, we showed that more than 50% of these predictions were correct in each category, yielding ligands with excellent binding efficiencies. These results highlight that docking is a suitable tool for the identification of ligands with tailored binding profiles to GPCRs, even when using homology models. More importantly, we present novel CXCR3-CXCR4 dual modulators that might pave the road to understanding the mechanisms of polypharmacological inhibition of these receptors.

Functional characterization of a conserved pair of NKR-P1 receptors expressed by NK cells and T lymphocytes in liver and gut.

Natural killer cell receptor protein 1 (NKR-P1) molecules are C-type lectin-like receptors modulating cellular responses toward target cells expressing C-type lectin-like related (Clr) molecules. Although the function of the prototypic rat NKR-P1A receptor and its inhibitory counterpart NKR-P1B are known, little is known about NKR-P1F and NKR-P1G apart from their promiscuity for Clr ligands. Here we generated mAbs against both receptors for phenotypic and functional analyses in rat tissues. NKR-P1F induced redirected lysis and robust Ca(2+) signaling in NK cells, which were prevented by simultaneous engagement of NKR-P1G. NKR-P1G also inhibited NK-cell lysis of Clr transfectants. NKR-P1F was expressed by most NK cells and NKR-P1A(+) Tcells in all tissues analyzed, and by many NKR-P1A(-) intestinal Tcells, while NKR-P1G was expressed by subsets of these cells with highest prevalence in gut and liver. In the intraepithelial compartment, the proportion of NKR-P1A(+) and NKR-P1F(+) cells was high at birth and thereafter declined, while NKR-P1B(+) and NKR-P1G(+) cells increased with age. Expression levels were also modulated by cytokines, with an increase of NKR-P1B and NKR-P1G induced by inflammatory cytokines, and a reduction of NKR-P1A by TGF-β. The physiological impact of NKR-P1 receptors might thus be dependent on age, tissue, and inflammatory status.

Abstract 15833: LRP1 is a Novel Receptor of Bmper and Required for Pathological Angiogenesis

Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) is a multifunctional member of the LDL receptor family, impacting a variety of biological processes such as lipid metabolism, endocytosis and signal transduction. However, the role of LRP1 in endothelium was almost unknown. Until recently we discovered that LRP1 is a novel regulator of bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) signaling through its association with the extracellular modulator-Bmper (Bmp-binding endothelial cell precursor-derived regulator) and regulates zebrafish vascular development. Here we studied the functional roles of LRP1 in mammalian system by performing cell culture studies with endothelial cells (ECs) and analyzing angiogenic defects in oxygen-induced retinopathy model with LRP1flox/flox;Tie2-Cre+/- mice (EC-LRP1 KO). In MECs, we observed that the activation of Src, ERK and tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins were induced by Bmper and this activation was LRP1-dependent since LRP1 knockdown inhibited their activation. However, this Bmper-induced activation was not blocked by Bmp4 neutralized antibody, which suggests that LRP1 is required for Bmp4-independent signaling for Bmper. These data also indicate that Bmper and LRP1 is a novel ligand receptor pair. Moreover, we observed that LRP1 protein was induced in response to 1% hypoxia in both mouse ECs (MECs) and human retinal microvascular endothelial cells, suggesting that LRP1 is required for hypoxia induced endothelial function. In hypoxia condition, EC-LRP1 KO mice resulted in accelerated angiogenesis in retinal endothelial cells, similar to the pattern of Bmper deleted mice. Therefore, we identify that the Bmper/LRP1 signaling is a novel signaling pathway in endothelial cells and their activity regulates angiogenic responses during oxygen-induced retinopathy. This study provides mechanistic insights for angiogenesis-related pathophysiologic conditions.

A Direct Interaction between the Sigma-1 Receptor and the hERG Voltage-gated K+ Channel Revealed by Atomic Force Microscopy and Homogeneous Time-resolved Fluorescence (HTRF®)

The sigma-1 receptor is an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein, widely expressed in central and peripheral tissues, which can translocate to the plasma membrane and modulate the function of various ion channels. The human ether-à-go-go-related gene encodes hERG, a cardiac voltage-gated K(+) channel that is abnormally expressed in many human cancers and is known to interact functionally with the sigma-1 receptor. Our aim was to investigate the nature of the interaction between the sigma-1 receptor and hERG. We show that the two proteins can be co-isolated from a detergent extract of stably transfected HEK-293 cells, consistent with a direct interaction between them. Atomic force microscopy imaging of the isolated protein confirmed the direct binding of the sigma-1 receptor to hERG monomers, dimers, and tetramers. hERG dimers and tetramers became both singly and doubly decorated by sigma-1 receptors; however, hERG monomers were only singly decorated. The distribution of angles between pairs of sigma-1 receptors bound to hERG tetramers had two peaks, at ∼90 and ∼180° in a ratio of ∼2:1, indicating that the sigma-1 receptor interacts with hERG with 4-fold symmetry. Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF®) allowed the detection of the interaction between the sigma-1 receptor and hERG within the plane of the plasma membrane. This interaction was resistant to sigma ligands, but was decreased in response to cholesterol depletion of the membrane. We suggest that the sigma-1 receptor may bind to hERG in the endoplasmic reticulum, aiding its assembly and trafficking to the plasma membrane.

Optimizing the Selectivity of Surface-Adsorbing Multivalent Polymers.

Multivalent polymers are macromolecules containing multiple chemical moieties designed to bind to complementary moieties on a target; for example, a protein with multiple ligands that have affinity for receptors on a cell surface. Though the individual ligand–receptor bonds are often weak, the combinatorial entropy associated with the different possible ligand–receptor pairs leads to a binding transition that can be very sharp with respect to control parameters, such as temperature or surface receptor concentration. We use mean-field self-consistent field theory to study the binding selectivity of multivalent polymers to receptor-coated surfaces. Polymers that have their ligands clustered into a contiguous domain, either located at the chain end or chain midsection, exhibit cooperative surface adsorption and superselectivity when the polymer concentration is low. On the other hand, when the ligands are uniformly spaced along the chain backbone, selectivity is substantially reduced due to the lack of binding cooperativity and due to crowding of the surface by the inert polymer segments in the chain backbone.

Molecular Signatures of Mouse TRPV1-Lineage Neurons Revealed by RNA-Seq Transcriptome Analysis

Disorders of pain neural systems are frequently chronic and, when recalcitrant to treatment, can severely degrade the quality of life. The pain pathway begins with sensory neurons in dorsal root or trigeminal ganglia, and the neuronal subpopulations that express the transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (TRPV1) ion channel transduce sensations of painful heat and inflammation and play a fundamental role in clinical pain arising from cancer and arthritis. In the present study, we elucidate the complete transcriptomes of neurons from the TRPV1 lineage and a non-TRPV1 neuroglial population in sensory ganglia through the combined application of next-gen deep RNA-Seq, genetic neuronal labeling with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, or neuron-selective chemoablation. RNA-Seq accurately quantitates gene expression, a difficult parameter to determine with most other methods, especially for very low and very high expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes are present at every level of cellular function from the nucleus to the plasma membrane. We identified many ligand receptor pairs in the TRPV1 population, suggesting that autonomous presynaptic regulation may be a major regulatory mechanism in nociceptive neurons. The data define, in a quantitative, cell population–specific fashion, the molecular signature of a distinct and clinically important group of pain-sensing neurons and provide an overall framework for understanding the transcriptome of TRPV1 nociceptive neurons. PerspectiveNext-gen RNA-Seq, combined with molecular genetics, provides a comprehensive and quantitative measurement of transcripts in TRPV1 lineage neurons and a contrasting transcriptome from non-TRPV1 neurons and cells. The transcriptome highlights previously unrecognized protein families, identifies multiple molecular circuits for excitatory or inhibitory autocrine and paracrine signaling, and suggests new combinatorial approaches to pain control.

Bind and separate: how ephrins and their receptors create tissue boundaries.

At every stage of development, newly formed clusters of cells must separate from others, forming distinct boundaries between them. Without such divisions, there could be no tissue layers, no organs, no bulging muscle contracting against rigid bone. Accumulating evidence indicates that, in broad outline, the trigger for these types of dissociation is interaction between surface proteins, called ephrins, on one group of cells and ephrin receptors on the opposing group of cells. Binding of the two leads to cell–cell repulsion and eventual separation into distinct tissues. However, cells express ephrins and receptors not only at the latent tissue boundary but throughout the tissue. Given that, it has been unclear how the repulsive signal is restricted to the tissue boundary. In this issue of PLOS Biology, Nazanin Rohani, Francois Fagotto, and colleagues elucidate the critical features of ephrin–receptor interaction at the interface between tissues and show that the concentration and binding affinities of specific ligand–receptor pairs largely explain the specificity of this key developmental program. The authors examined one of the earliest separation events: that between the dorsal ectoderm (which gives rise to the nervous system and skin) and the mesoderm (which forms bone, muscle, and a variety of other tissues). They found that each tissue expressed its own set of ephrins and receptors: ephrin B3 selectively accumulated in the ectoderm, for instance, whereas receptor A4, to which ephrin B3 binds, is enriched in the mesoderm (Figure 1). Depletion of any one of the multiple ephrins or receptors, in either tissue, diminished the degree of separation of the two tissues, indicating the involvement of multiple signals in vivo. Switching the extracellular, but not intracellular, domains of different receptors switched their signaling abilities, showing that the specificity of the signal resides in the extracellular domain. Figure 1 This study reveals how a system of multiple ephrin–Eph repulsive signals is used by embryonic cells to make the crucial decision to stay together or split into different tissues. The tissue-specific expression of individual ephrin–receptor pairs was a critical aspect of boundary formation. When ephrin B3, normally expressed only in ectoderm, was expressed in mesoderm, it caused two portions of mesoderm to separate from each other, because the ectopic B3 interacted with the endogenous receptor A4. Similarly, when endogenous ephrin B3 interacted with ectopic receptor A4 in ectoderm, it caused separation of two portions of ectoderm. Remarkably, successful B3–A4 interaction did not depend on each being expressed in its usual tissue. When the endogenous expression of each was silenced, and then each was ectopically expressed in the opposite tissue, mesoderm and ectoderm separated normally. Tissue separation is driven by the ephrin–receptor system but resisted by cell adhesion molecules called cadherins. The authors found that the strength of the two opposing forces determined the outcome: increasing the expression of cadherins reduced detachment, whereas decreasing their expression increased it. The mechanical act of detachment requires the contractile protein myosin, and chemical inhibition of myosin reduced tissue separation. Finally, the authors found that a similar set of ephrin–receptor interactions explained separation of other tissues, including ectoderm from ventral mesoderm and the partitioning of the dorsal mesoderm to form the notochord. Although different in detail (different tissues express different sets and concentrations of ephrins and receptors), the same principles held: opposing tissues express specific ephrin–receptor pairs, whose interactions drive their detachment. Cells of a single tissue expressing a particular ephrin express little or none of the complementary binding partner, ensuring the integrity of the tissue. No single pair determines detachment by itself; the decision to separate is the sum of multiple ephrin–receptor interactions, as well as the strength of cadherins and the vigor of myosin contraction. There is much more to learn here, including the consequences of the tissue-specific expression of individual ephrin–receptor pairs and how the level of each molecule is determined by the developmental eventspreceding its expression. The results presented in this study provide the framework for these future investigations. Rohani N, Parmeggiani A, Winklbauer R, Fagotto F (2014) Variable Combinations of Specific Ephrin Ligand/Eph Receptor Pairs Control Embryonic Tissue Separation. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001955

Evolution of gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone receptor and its ligand

Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH) is a neuropeptide inhibitor of gonadotropin secretion, which was first identified in the Japanese quail hypothalamus. GnIH peptides share a C-terminal LPXRFamide (X=L or Q) motif in most vertebrates. The receptor for GnIH (GnIHR) is the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 147 (GPR147) that inhibits cAMP production. GPR147 is also named neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptor 1 (NPFFR1), because it also binds NPFF that has a C-terminal PQRFamide motif. To understand the evolutionary history of the GnIH system in the animal kingdom, we searched for receptors structurally similar to GnIHR in the genome of six mammals (human, mouse, rat, cattle, cat, and rabbit), five birds (pigeon, chicken, turkey, budgerigar, and zebra finch), one reptile (green anole), one amphibian (Western clawed flog), six fishes (zebrafish, Nile tilapia, Fugu, coelacanth, spotted gar, and lamprey), one hemichordate (acorn worm), one echinoderm (purple sea urchin), one mollusk (California sea hare), seven insects (pea aphid, African malaria mosquito, honey bee, buff-tailed bumblebee, fruit fly, jewel wasp, and red flour beetle), one cnidarian (hydra), and constructed phylogenetic trees by neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. A multiple sequence alignment of the receptors showed highly conserved seven-transmembrane domains as well as disulfide bridge sites between the first and second extracellular loops, including the receptor of hydra. Both NJ and ML analyses grouped the receptors of vertebrates into NPFFR1 and NPFFR2 (GPR74), and the receptors of insects into the receptor for SIFamide peptides that share a C-terminal YRKPPFNGSIFamide motif. Although human, quail and zebrafish GnIHR (NPFFR1) were most structurally similar to SIFamide receptor of fruit fly in the Famide peptide (FMRFamide, neuropeptide F, short neuropeptide F, drosulfakinin, myosuppressin, SIFamide) receptor families, the amino acid sequences and the peptide coding regions of GnIH precursors were most similar to FMRFamide precursor of fruit fly in the precursors of Famide peptide families. Chromosome synteny analysis of the precursor genes of human, quail and zebrafish GnIH and fruit fly Famide peptides further identified conserved synteny in vertebrate GnIH and fruit fly FMRFa precursor genes as well as other Famide peptide precursor genes. These results suggest that GnIH and its receptor pair and SIFamide and its receptor pair may have diverged and co-evolved independently in vertebrates and insects, respectively, from their ancestral Famide peptide and its receptor pair, during diversification and evolution of deuterostomian and protostomian species.

Unravelling the multiple functions of the architecturally intricate Streptococcus pneumoniae β-galactosidase, BgaA.

Bacterial cell-surface proteins play integral roles in host-pathogen interactions. These proteins are often architecturally and functionally sophisticated and yet few studies of such proteins involved in host-pathogen interactions have defined the domains or modules required for specific functions. Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), an opportunistic pathogen that is a leading cause of community acquired pneumonia, otitis media and bacteremia, is decorated with many complex surface proteins. These include β-galactosidase BgaA, which is specific for terminal galactose residues β-1–4 linked to glucose or N-acetylglucosamine and known to play a role in pneumococcal growth, resistance to opsonophagocytic killing, and adherence. This study defines the domains and modules of BgaA that are required for these distinct contributions to pneumococcal pathogenesis. Inhibitors of β-galactosidase activity reduced pneumococcal growth and increased opsonophagocytic killing in a BgaA dependent manner, indicating these functions require BgaA enzymatic activity. In contrast, inhibitors increased pneumococcal adherence suggesting that BgaA bound a substrate of the enzyme through a distinct module or domain. Extensive biochemical, structural and cell based studies revealed two newly identified non-enzymatic carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) mediate adherence to the host cell surface displayed lactose or N-acetyllactosamine. This finding is important to pneumococcal biology as it is the first adhesin-carbohydrate receptor pair identified, supporting the widely held belief that initial pneumococcal attachment is to a glycoconjugate. Perhaps more importantly, this is the first demonstration that a CBM within a carbohydrate-active enzyme can mediate adherence to host cells and thus this study identifies a new class of carbohydrate-binding adhesins and extends the paradigm of CBM function. As other bacterial species express surface-associated carbohydrate-active enzymes containing CBMs these findings have broad implications for bacterial adherence. Together, these data illustrate that comprehending the architectural sophistication of surface-attached proteins can increase our understanding of the different mechanisms by which these proteins can contribute to bacterial pathogenesis.

Sperm-egg fusion: a molecular enigma of mammalian reproduction.

The mechanism of gamete fusion remains largely unknown on a molecular level despite its indisputable significance. Only a few of the molecules required for membrane interaction are known, among them IZUMO1, which is present on sperm, tetraspanin CD9, which is present on the egg, and the newly found oolema protein named Juno. A concept of a large multiprotein complex on both membranes forming fusion machinery has recently emerged. The Juno and IZUMO1, up to present, is the only known extracellular receptor pair in the process of fertilization, thus, facilitating the essential binding of gametes. However, neither IZUMO1 nor Juno appears to be the fusogenic protein. At the same time, the tetraspanin is expected to play a role in organizing the egg membrane order and to interact laterally with other factors. This review summarizes, to present, the known molecules involved in the process of sperm-egg fusion. The complexity and expected redundancy of the involved factors makes the process an intricate and still poorly understood mechanism, which is difficult to comprehend in its full distinction.

Molecular evolution of GPCRs: Secretin/secretin receptors.

In mammals, secretin is a 27-amino acid peptide that was first studied in 1902 by Bayliss and Starling from the extracts of the jejunal mucosa for its ability to stimulate pancreatic secretion. To date, secretin has only been identified in tetrapods, with the earliest diverged secretin found in frogs. Despite being the first hormone discovered, secretin's evolutionary origin remains enigmatic, it shows moderate sequence identity in nonmammalian tetrapods but is highly conserved in mammals. Current hypotheses suggest that although secretin has already emerged before the divergence of osteichthyans, it was lost in fish and retained only in land vertebrates. Nevertheless, the cognate receptor of secretin has been identified in both actinopterygian fish (zebrafish) and sarcopterygian fish (lungfish). However, the zebrafish secretin receptor was shown to be nonbioactive. Based on the present information that the earliest diverged bioactive secretin receptor was found in lungfish, and its ability to interact with both vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide potently suggested that secretin receptor was descended from a VPAC-like receptor gene before the Actinopterygii-Sarcopterygii split in the vertebrate lineage. Hence, secretin and secretin receptor have gone through independent evolutionary trajectories despite their concurrent emergence post-2R. A functional secretin-secretin receptor axis has probably emerged in the amphibians. Although the pleiotropic actions of secretin are well documented in the literature, only limited information of its physiological functions in nonmammalian tetrapods have been reported. To decipher the structural and functional divergence of secretin and secretin receptor, functional characterization of the ligand-receptor pair in nonmammals would be the next perspective for investigation.

Tools and Strategies to Match Peptide-Ligand Receptor Pairs.

Peptide signals have emerged as an important class of regulators in cell-to-cell communication in plants. Several families of small, secreted proteins with a conserved C-terminal Pro-rich motif have been identified as functional peptide signals in Arabidopsis thaliana. These proteins are presumed to be trimmed proteolytically and undergo posttranslational modifications, such as hydroxylation of Pro residues and glycosylation, to form mature, bioactive signals. Identification and matching of such ligands with their respective receptors remains a major challenge since the genes encoding them often show redundancy and low expression restricted to a few cells or particular developmental stages. To overcome these difficulties, we propose the use of ectopic expression of receptor genes in suitable plant cells like Nicotiana benthamiana for testing ligand candidates in receptor output assays and in binding studies. As an example, we used the IDA peptide HAE/HSL2 receptor signaling system known to regulate floral organ abscission. We demonstrate that the oxidative burst response can be employed as readout for receptor activation by synthetic peptides and that a new, highly sensitive, nonradioactive labeling approach can be used to reveal a direct correlation between peptide activity and receptor affinity. We suggest that these approaches will be of broad value for the field of ligand-receptor studies in plants.