Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Research Articles

Impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

142 Background: Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and the depth of response (DpR) are early on-treatment surrogate markers for survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. However, the utility of ETS and DpR for BRAF V600E mutant (MT) mCRC which has a poor prognosis remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between ETS and DpR and clinical outcomes in BRAF V600E MT mCRC. Methods: mCRC patients who were diagnosed BRAF V600E MT and treated with 1st line chemotherapy from June 2011 to March 2023 at single cancer institute were enrolled. We analyzed the association between ETS and DpR and clinical outcome in patients who had at least one target lesion. Subgroup analysis of clinical factors related to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using multivariate analysis. ETS was defined as the relative change in the sum of the longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at first follow-up CT scan compared to baseline and DpR was defined as the relative change in the sum of the longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at the nadir in the absence of new lesions or progression of non-target lesions compared to baseline. Results: In total, 54 patients of BRAF V600E MT mCRC had at least one target lesion. In total of StageI-IV CRC patients, the incidence of BRAF V600E MT was 6.3% (233/3705). Patients with ETS ≥ 20% and DpR ≥ 25% (median value) were 24 (44.4%) and 27 (50%) respectively. PFS was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0-9.9) and OS was 17.1 months (95% CI, 11.7-20.2). Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS and tended to have longer OS than those with non-ETS, with a median PFS of 9.8 months vs. 4.8 months (P Log-rank = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR), 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.00), and a median OS of 22.6 months vs. 11.6 months (P Log-rank = 0.18, HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37-1.21). Patients with DpR ≥ 25% had also longer PFS and OS than those with non-DpR, with a median PFS of 11.0 vs. 4.3 months (P Log-rank < 0.01, HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.66) and a median OS of 22.6 vs. 10.1 months (P Log-rank = 0.047, HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00). Median time to DpR was 3.05 months. In multivariate analysis, DpR was significantly associated with both longer PFS (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14–0.55, P < 0.01) and OS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29–0.96, P = 0.04). Conclusions: ETS and DpR may be early surrogate markers for clinical outcome in BRAF V600E MT mCRC who were treated with 1st line chemotherapy.

Efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase Ⅱ study

Limited therapeutic options are available for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients after failure of first- and second-line therapies, representing an unmet medical need for novel therapies. This is an open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ study aiming to perform the efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, a noval fully humanized IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. SCT200 (6mg/kg) was given weekly for the first six weeks, followed by a higher dose of 8mg/kg every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included ORR in patients with left-sided tumor, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. From February 12, 2018 to December 1, 2019, a total of 110 patients aged between 26 and 77 years (median: 55; interquartile range [IQR]: 47-63) with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC were enrolled from 22 hospitals in China. As the data cut-off date on May 15, 2020, the IRC-assessed ORR and DCR was 31% (34/110, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22-40%) and 75% (82/110, 95% CI 65-82%), respectively. Thirty one percent (34/110) patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR). The median PFS and median OS were 5.1 months (95% CI 3.4-5.2) and 16.2 months (95% CI 11.1-not available [NA]), respectively. The most common≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypomagnesemia (17%, 19/110) and acneiform dermatitis (11%, 12/110). No deaths occurred. Genomic analysis suggested positive association between MYC amplification and patients' response (P=0.0058). RAS/RAF mutation and MET amplification were the most frequently detected resistance mechanisms. Patients with high circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline or without ctDNA clearance at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 had worse PFS and OS. SCT200 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients progressed on fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin treatment. The baseline ctDNA and ctDNA clearance status at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 could be a potential prognostic biomarker for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients with SCT200 therapy. This study was sponsored by Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2019ZX09732001-006, 2017ZX09304015).

Risk Factor Analysis for Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody-induced Problematic Skin Toxicities in Patients With Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

We previously reported that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and baseline liver metastasis are at a higher risk of developing grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities when treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. This study aimed to identify additional factors associated with skin toxicities induced by anti-EGFR treatment in patients with liver metastatic CRC. Patients with liver metastatic CRC who initially received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-containing treatment (n=77) were retrospectively assessed. The primary endpoint was to identify the factor(s) responsible for the development of grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities. Additionally, factors for grade ≥2 rash and paronychia were evaluated. The incidence of grade ≥2 overall skin symptoms, rash, and paronychia was 62.3%, 31.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that age <65 years and anemia were independent baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities (adjusted hazard ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval=1.10-3.97, p=0.02 for age; 2.36, 1.20-4.61, p=0.01 for anemia). In contrast, combination prophylaxis using systemic minocycline and corticosteroid ointment was a preventive factor (0.47, 0.25-0.88, p=0.02). Males and age <65 years were baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 rash, and combination prophylaxis was identified as a preventive factor. No factors were identified for paronychia. Age <65 years and anemia were identified as independent baseline risk factors. Additionally, combination prophylaxis was found to be a preventive factor against anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities in patients with liver metastatic CRC.

The Cytokine Storm of Multicentric Castleman Disease.

As described throughout this book, different triggers can elicit a variety of different cytokine storm disorders that share overlapping clinical features (Fig. 31.1). Even within a particular cytokine storm disorder, multiple different triggers can elicit the syndrome. Like HLH, multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) serves as a great example of this as it can be caused by a viral infection, neoplastic cell population, or an unknown cause. Furthermore, the idiopathic subtype of MCD (iMCD) provides one of the first examples of a cytokine storm disorder that could be abrogated with targeted neutralization of a single cytokine when inhibition with the anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab was shown to effectively treat iMCD in the 1990s. Of course, this "iMCD treatment," tocilizumab, has been used in a variety of cytokine storm settings over the last 30+ years.

Potential Efficacy of Shiunko for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Monoclonal Antibody-Induced Skin Fissure: A Single Institutional Case Series.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) is the key drug for RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissures often affect a patient's quality of life. Shiunko, a traditional Japanese topical herbal medicine, is used for burns and dermatitis and may potentially have wound-healing effects. Herein, we report cases of patients with mCRC who were treated with Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with mCRC who received an anti-EGFR mAb-containing regimen and were treated with Shiunko twice a day for skin fissures at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March 2022 and December 2022. Skin fissures were assessed at baseline and at every visit until 28 days after Shiunko initiation according to CTCAE v5.0. Among the 11 patients, 5 patients were female; the median age was 61 (range, 43-79) years. The median treatment duration with anti-EGFR mAb before Shiunko initiation was 13.1 (range, 6-52) weeks. Skin moisturizer and topical steroids were applied for skin fissures in 11 and 5 patients, respectively. All patients had grade 2 skin fissures at baseline of Shiunko initiation. Two weeks after Shiunko initiation, complete recovery was noted in 4 patients and improvement to grade 1 was noted in 6 patients. There were no Shiunko-related adverse events. Ten patients continued anti-EGFR mAb treatment until disease progression, while 1 patient discontinued anti-EGFR mAb treatment due to severe eruptions. Shiunko could be a treatment option for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. Further studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety of Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure.

Successful use of dupilumab for egg-induced eosinophilic gastroenteritis with duodenal ulcer: a pediatric case report and review of literature

BackgroundNon-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (non-EoE-EGID) is a rare disease in which eosinophils infiltrate parts of the gastrointestinal tract other than the esophagus; however, the number of patients with non-EoE-EGID has been increasing in recent years. Owing to its chronic course with repeated relapses, it can lead to developmental delays due to malnutrition, especially in pediatric patients. No established treatment exists for non-EoE-EGID, necessitating long-term systemic corticosteroid administration. Although the efficacy of dupilumab, an anti-IL-4/13 receptor monoclonal antibody, for eosinophilic esophagitis, has been reported, only few reports have demonstrated its efficacy in non-EoE EGIDs.Case presentationA 13-year-old boy developed non-EoE-EGID with duodenal ulcers, with chicken eggs as the trigger. He was successfully treated with an egg-free diet, proton pump inhibitors, and leukotriene receptor antagonists. However, at age 15, he developed worsening upper abdominal pain and difficulty eating. Blood analysis revealed eosinophilia; elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate; and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, total immunoglobulin E, and thymic and activation-regulated chemokines. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a duodenal ulcer with marked mucosal eosinophilic infiltration. Gastrointestinal symptoms persisted even after starting systemic steroids, making it difficult to reduce the steroid dose. Subcutaneous injection of dupilumab was initiated because of comorbid atopic dermatitis exacerbation. After 3 months, the gastrointestinal symptoms disappeared, and after 5 months, the duodenal ulcer disappeared and the eosinophil count decreased in the mucosa. Six months later, systemic steroids were discontinued, and the duodenal ulcer remained recurrence-free. The egg challenge test result was negative; therefore, the egg-free diet was discontinued. Blood eosinophil count and serum IL-5, IL-13, and eotaxin-3 levels decreased after dupilumab treatment. The serum levels of IL-5 and eotaxin-3 remained within normal ranges, although the blood eosinophil counts increased again after discontinuation of oral prednisolone.ConclusionsSuppression of IL-4R/IL-13R-mediated signaling by dupilumab may improve abdominal symptoms and endoscopic and histologic findings in patients with non-EoE-EGID, leading to the discontinuation of systemic steroid administration and tolerance of causative foods.

Early Effect of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine with Medication Overuse: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Objective Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been reported to reduce the frequency of medication overuse in patients with migraine. The present study investigated whether or not CGRP-mAb treatment shows early effectiveness for medication overuse headache (MOH) in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients with MOH who received preventive treatment with CGRP-mAb from June 2021 to October 2022. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition was used to diagnose MOH. This study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University. Patients were recruited from this specialized headache outpatient center. Results In total, 69 patients with migraine had newly introduced CGRP-mAb, and 34 patients had MOH (49.3%). The mean±standard deviation patient age was 44±15.5 years old. The study population included 24 women (70.6%). The types of CGRP-mAb used were galcanezumab in 16 patients (47.0%), fremanezumab in 10 (29.4%), and erenumab in 8 (23.5%). The mean disease duration was 19.6±13.1 years. The types of migraine diagnosis were chronic migraine in 28 patients (82.4%) and migraine with aura in 11 patients (32.4%). The mean number of headache days in the month before administration of CGRP-mAb was 22±7.7 days; 1 month after administration, the MHD was 16.9±9.1 days. The change in MHD was -5.7 days (22.7%), indicating significant improvement (p<0.05). Conclusion CGRP-mAb has been suggested as a preventive treatment for patients with MOH. Further investigation of the long-term efficacy of CGRP-mAb for MOH is needed.

Effect of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer according to the status of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor activity. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) might act upon VEGFR2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of combining ramucirumab and paclitaxel according to the status of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This analysis included AGC patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as 2nd line therapy between December 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, at Samsung Medical Center. All patient data analyses included an evaluation of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS). We analyzed the efficacy and the survival of patients according to their PD-L1 expression. We included 117 patients in this analysis, and 80 patients (68.4%) had a PD-L1 CPS of one or more, 37 (31.6%) had five or more, and 19 (16.2%) had ten or more scores. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than one and one or more {PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; PFS: median 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.8 months] vs. median 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-4.7 months), P=0.93; PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; OS: median 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6 months) vs. median 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.4-9.8 months), P=0.32}. PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than 5 and 5 or more [PD-L1 <5% vs. PD-L1 ≥5%; PFS: 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.5 months) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.8 months), P=0.57; OS: 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-8.3 months) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-18.9 months), P=0.07]. Interestingly, with a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10, PFS and OS did differ significantly [PD-L1 <10% vs. PD-L1 ≥10%; PFS: 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.3 months) vs. 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.3 months), P=0.05; OS: 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-7.9 months) vs. 18.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-31.3 months), P=0.04]. No biomarkers have been established to predict survival times after ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment. This analysis suggests that a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10 might be novel a biomarker to predict the survival of AGC patients treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel.

Exploring novel approaches to food allergy management.

Nurse practitioners are likely to encounter pediatric and adult patients with symptoms of food allergy who need an accurate diagnosis, emergency treatment plans, and options for management. The pathophysiology of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy, current and emerging diagnostics, treatment, and emergency management is briefly reviewed, and promising new and potential future treatment options are discussed. Currently, Food and Drug Administration-approved oral immunotherapy (OIT) treatment for peanut allergy, but clinical trials are underway to explore multiple-allergen OIT and alternate routes for IT such as sublingual and epicutaneous. Treatments that modulate the immune system are also potential treatments for food allergies (FAs), including biologic agents. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE therapy, dupilumab, an interleukin-4Ra receptor monoclonal antibody, and etokimab, an anti-IL-33, are all being studied for the treatment of food allergy. There is hope that these novel therapies for FAs will be a viable option translated to the practice setting in the near future, so that strict avoidance is not the only treatment plan for FAs. Nurse practitioners can support their patients with FAs and their families by keeping abreast of progress in food allergy research and assisting patients to consider novel treatment options, when appropriate, using shared decision making.

Prolonging the stability of cetuximab (Erbitux®) and panitumumab (Vectibix®): An orthogonal assessment of physicochemical, biological and microbiological properties of original opened glass vials and diluted saline preparations

The two anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab are the pillars for the treatment of EGFR-positive, KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers. However, stability data of these mAbs are generally missing or incomplete. Here, we report for the first time an orthogonal analysis of the stability of cetuximab (Erbitux®) and panitumumab (Vectibix®), either undiluted vial leftovers or saline dilutions in polyolefin/polyamide infusion bags. All samples were stored at 2–8 °C protected from light, according to their summary of product characteristics (SmPCs). Alternatively, opened vials and preparations were maintained at 25 °C for 15 h, and then stored again at 2–8 °C protected from light to mimic a temporary interruption of the cold chain. Vial leftovers proved stable up to 180 days when stored according to their SmPCs, while compounded preparations in infusion bags maintained their physiochemical, biological and microbiological stability up to 30 days. Additionally, no changes were detected up to 30 days for the same samples undergoing a thermal excursion. Our results provide additional rationale to the SmPCs, crucial especially in the case of reassignment and pre-preparation of bags. This information will allow hospitals to achieve significant cost savings, and better organization of the entire therapeutic process.

Monoclonal antibody cetuximab impairs matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell migration in feline oral squamous cell carcinoma in vitro.

Feline oral squamous cell carcinoma (FOSCC) is characterised by invasive and metastatic behaviour and is poorly responsive to current treatments, hence the need for new therapeutic strategies. FOSCC shares molecular targets with human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), among these the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody employed in the therapy of HNSCC and, interestingly, previous work in vitro suggested that it displays cytostatic and cytotoxic properties also against FOSCC. With the present study, we aimed at further investigating the effects of cetuximab on invasion and metastasis pathways proven to be relevant in human patients. To this purpose, FOSCC cell lines SCCF1, SCCF2 and SCCF3 were treated with cetuximab for 48/72 h and subjected to Western blot for matrix metalloproteinases-2/9 (MMP-2/9) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers vimentin, E-, P- and N-cadherin. Treatment with cetuximab resulted in downregulation of MMP-2/-9 in all of the three cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, cetuximab downregulated vimentin and P-cadherin in SCCF1, upregulated E-cadherin whilst downregulating P-/N-cadherins in SCCF2, and impaired P-/N-cadherins in SCCF3. An in vitro scratch test also demonstrated that cetuximab delayed cell migration in SCCF3. These data suggest that cetuximab mitigates invasion and metastasis processes by impairing MMPs and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways in FOSCC, indicating that this monoclonal antibody may help to counteract malignant progression and improve the management of locally invasive disease.

Developing New Strategies for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and biologically heterogeneous disease. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience disease relapse or will be refractory to first-line chemo immunotherapy. In recent years, there have been several new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. These agents include anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) and monoclonal antibody therapies such as polatuzumab and tafasitamab. Nevertheless, despite the high efficacy of all these new therapies, there are still patients who do not respond or relapse, representing an unmet clinical need. This review describes new promising therapies that are in clinical development to treat R/R DLBCL.

Teprotumumab for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Thyroid Eye Disease.

Teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor monoclonal antibody, is FDA-approved to treat thyroid eye disease (TED). The initial clinical trials excluded patients with previous orbital irradiation, surgery, glucocorticoid use (cumulative dose >1 gm), or prior biologic treatment. Information on the use of teprotumumab for patients who failed prior therapy is limited. Our purpose is to characterize the efficacy of teprotumumab for the treatment of recalcitrant TED. This is a multicenter retrospective study of all patients treated with teprotumumab for moderate-to-severe TED after failing conventional therapy with corticosteroids, orbital radiation, surgical decompression, biologics, or other steroid-sparing medications. Treatment failure was defined as an incomplete response to or reactivation after previous treatment. Only patients who received at least 4 infusions of teprotumumab were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures comprised proptosis response (≥2 mm reduction in the study eye without a similar increase in the other eye), clinical activity score (CAS) response (≥2-point reduction in CAS), and diplopia response (≥1 point improvement in Gorman diplopia score in patients with baseline diplopia) following treatment. Adverse events and risk factors for recalcitrant disease were also evaluated. Sixty-six patients were included in this study, 46 females and 20 males. Average age was 59.3 years (range 29-93). The mean duration of disease from TED diagnosis to first infusion was 57.8 months. The proptosis, CAS, and diplopia responses in this recalcitrant patient population were 85.9%, 93.8%, and 69.1%, respectively. Patients experienced a mean reduction in proptosis of 3.1 ± 2.4 mm and a mean improvement in CAS of 3.8 ± 1.6. Patients who underwent prior decompression surgery experienced a statistically significant decrease in diplopia response (46.7% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.014) and proptosis response (75.0% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.045) when compared with nondecompression patients. Additionally, there were no significant differences in proptosis, CAS, and diplopia responses between patients with acute (defined as disease duration <1 year) versus chronic (disease duration ≥1 year) TED. While most adverse events were mild to moderate, 4 patients reported serious adverse events related to persistent hearing loss. Patients with recalcitrant TED demonstrated a significant improvement after teprotumumab in each of the primary study outcomes. The degree of proptosis reduction, diplopia response, and CAS improvement in the recalcitrant group were similar to those of treatment-naïve patients from the pivotal clinical trials. Patients with a prior history of orbital decompression, however, demonstrated poor improvement in diplopia and less reduction in proptosis than surgery naïve patients. These results indicate that teprotumumab is a treatment option for the treatment of patients with TED recalcitrant to prior medical therapies.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundRAS mutations affect prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have been identified as strong negative predictive markers for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) therapy, but many tumors containing wild-type RAS genes still do not respond to these therapies. Some additional biomarkers may have prognostic or predictive roles, but conclusions remain controversial.MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-EGFR mAb therapy with alternative therapy that investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of additional biomarkers in RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated. The prognostic value of biomarkers was investigated by separately pooling HR and OR for different treatment groups in an individual study. The predictive value was assessed by pooling study interactions between treatment effects and biomarker subgroups.ResultsThirty publications reporting on eighteen trials were selected, including a total of 13,507 patients. In prognostic analysis, BRAF mutations were associated with poorer PFS [HRs = 3.76 (2.47–5.73) and 2.69 (1.82–3.98)] and OS [HRs = 2.66 (1.95–3.65) and 2.45 (1.55–3.88)] in both the experimental and control arms; low miR-31-3p expression appeared to have longer PFS and OS. In terms of predictive effect, a lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy was observed in patients with BRAF mutant tumors (Pinteraction < 0.01 for PFS). Patients with tumors with any mutation in the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA gene also showed similar results compared with all wild-type tumors (Pinteraction for PFS, OS, and ORR were < 0.01, < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). While low miR-31-3p expression could predict PFS (Pinteraction = 0.01) and OS (Pinteraction = 0.04) benefit. The prognostic and predictive value regarding PIK3CA mutations, PTEN mutations or deletions, EGFR, EREG/AREG, HER2, HER3, and HER4 expression remains uncertain.ConclusionsIn RAS wt mCRC patients receiving EGFR-targeted therapy, BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic and therapy-predictive biomarker, with no effect found for PIK3CA mutation, PTEN mutation or deletion, but the combined biomarker KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Low miR-31-3p expression may have positive prognostic and therapy predictive effects. Evidence on the prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR and its ligands, and HER2/3/4 is insufficient.

Effect of Spesolimab on Achieving Sustained Disease Remission in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Results from the Effisayil 2 Study

Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by flares of widespread skin pustulation. Sustained skin clearance is a key treatment objective. Intravenous (IV) spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is approved for GPP flare treatment; however, the optimal dosing and long-term efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) spesolimab treatment in patients with GPP has not yet been reported. We report the effect of SC spesolimab on achieving sustained disease remission over 48 weeks in Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837), a trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SC spesolimab in preventing GPP flares.&#x0D; Methods: Patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo (n=31), low- (n=31, 300 mg loading dose [LD]; 150 mg every 12 weeks [q12w]), medium- (n=31, 600 mg LD; 300 mg q12w) or high-dose (n=30, 600 mg LD; 300 mg every 4 weeks [q4w]) SC spesolimab over 48 weeks. Sustained remission was defined as GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) total score of 0 or 1 at all visits up to Week 48, or GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 and all GPPGA subscores ≤2 at all visits up to Week 48. Sustained pustular clearance was defined as GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at all visits from Week 4 to Week 48. Any use of IV spesolimab or another standard of care for GPP worsening was considered a failure of remission. Missing data were imputed by a sequential logistic regression multiple imputation method. Adjusted risk differences (RD) were calculated by the Mantel−Haenszel type-weighted average of differences.&#x0D; Results: 31 patients received placebo, and 30 patients received high-dose spesolimab. Compared to placebo, more patients had sustained remission in the high-dose arm using both GPPGA total score 0 or 1 (63.3% vs 29.0%; RD [95% CI] 0.35 [0.10–0.59]), and GPPGA total score 0 or 1 and all GPPGA subscores ≤2 (60.4% vs 29.0%; RD [95% CI] 0.32 [0.07–0.56]). Compared to placebo, more patients in the high-dose arm had sustained pustular clearance over 48 weeks (63.6% vs 25.8%; RD [95% CI] 0.38 [0.14–0.62]).&#x0D; Conclusion: Overall, high-dose SC spesolimab q4w is effective for the long-term management of GPP skin symptoms.

Effect of Subcutaneous Spesolimab on the Prevention of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Flares Over 48 weeks: Subgroup Analyses from the Effisayil 2 Trial

Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is characterized by flares of widespread pustulation and erythema that may be fatal. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is approved to treat GPP flares. Effisayil 2 trial (NCT04399837) assessed efficacy and safety of spesolimab for prevention of GPP flares over 48 weeks. Here we show the efficacy of high-dose subcutaneous (SC) spesolimab for GPP flare prevention in prespecified subgroups in Effisayil 2.&#x0D; Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo, or low- (300 mg loading dose [LD]; 150 mg every 12 weeks [q12w]), medium- (600 mg LD; 300 mg q12w) or high-dose (600 mg LD; 300 mg every 4 weeks) SC spesolimab over 48 weeks. We assessed the efficacy of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo across prespecified subgroups (including IL36RN mutation, comorbid plaque psoriasis [PsV], and body mass index [BMI] status) for the primary endpoint, time to first GPP flare by Week 48 (defined as a ≥2 GPPGA total score increase from baseline and ≥2 GPPGA pustulation score increase from baseline; subsequent use of rescue SC spesolimab also indicated a GPP flare), using a Cox regression analysis stratified by systemic use of GPP medications at randomization. Key secondary endpoint was proportion of patients with ≥1 GPP flare by Week 48.&#x0D; Results: 123 patients were randomized (placebo, N=31; high-dose spesolimab, N=30). Hazard ratios (95% CI) for the primary endpoint favored high-dose spesolimab vs placebo in most prespecified subgroups, including: with IL36RN mutation, 0.04 (0.002, 1.152); without IL36RN mutation, 0.41 (0.109, 1.537); PsV absent at baseline, 0.14 (0.031, 0.629); PsV present at baseline, 0.22 (0.025, 1.883); and BMI &lt;25 kg/m2, 0.22 (0.057, 0.816); 25 to &lt;30 kg/m2, 0.12 (0.005, 2.817); and ≥30 kg/m2, 0.23 (0.008, 6.033). For the key secondary endpoint, adjusted risk differences (95% CI) by Week 48 were lower in those receiving high-dose spesolimab vs placebo in these prespecified subgroups: with IL36RN mutation, -0.75 (-1.000, -0.326); without IL36RN mutation, -0.22 (-0.504, 0.074); PsV absent at baseline, -0.41 (-0.672, -0.154); PsV present at baseline, -0.32 (-0.830, 0.191); and across all BMI subgroups.&#x0D; Conclusion: Over 48 weeks, high-dose spesolimab was effective at preventing GPP flares irrespective of IL36RN mutation, comorbid PsV and BMI status at baseline.

Spesolimab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory disorder characterized by painful inflammatory nodules (N), abscesses (A) and draining tunnels (dT), primarily affecting intertriginous areas. Interleukin-36 (IL-36) signaling has been notably expressed within HS inflammatory lesions. To address the need for targeted therapies, this Phase IIa proof-of-clinical-concept (PoCC) study (NCT04762277) explored the effect of spesolimab, an anti-IL-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe HS.&#x0D; Methods: Eligible patients (N=52) were randomized (2:1) to receive spesolimab or placebo (1200 mg intravenous dosing once weekly for three weeks [loading dose], followed by 1200 mg subcutaneous dosing every 2 weeks for 12 weeks). No formal statistical tests were performed, as this was an exploratory study. Of patients who completed the study, 45 were enrolled in an ongoing open-label extension (OLE) study (NCT04876391) with spesolimab. For each study, endpoints included change from baseline at Weeks 12 and 24 in total A, N and dT (ANdT) counts, and adverse events (AEs).&#x0D; Results: Mean changes from baseline at Week 12 in dT, A and total ANdT counts were -1.30, -0.53 and -4.87 in the spesolimab arm, and 1.07, 3.07 and -0.86 in the placebo arm, respectively. Mean changes in N count were numerically similar between the spesolimab (-3.00) and placebo (-5.00) arms. Of patients with ≥1 dT at baseline, a numerically greater proportion had a decrease in dT count at Week 12 in the spesolimab (16/24, 66.7%) versus the placebo (5/13, 38.5%) arm. Least squares mean changes from baseline in total AN count at Week 12 were -38.8% and -34.7% in the spesolimab and placebo arms, respectively, which may have been affected by higher baseline AN and N counts in the spesolimab versus placebo arm. In the OLE, patients originally randomized to spesolimab (n=30) achieved sustained reductions in dT count and in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at Week 24. The safety profile of spesolimab was similar to that reported in other trials; among the 52 patients enrolled in the PoCC study, 77.8% (spesolimab) and 87.5% (placebo) of patients reported ≥1 AE. No patients receiving spesolimab reported serious AEs, and no new safety concerns were identified by Week 24. No deaths were reported.&#x0D; Conclusion: Our findings show that spesolimab was well tolerated and decreased all HS lesions. These results support the development of spesolimab in HS.&#x0D; This study was supported and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Ianalumab, a Novel Anti-B-Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) Receptor (BAFF-R) Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) in Development for Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) and Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA), Has Demonstrated a Favorable Safety Profile in Sjögren's Syndrome (SjS), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Background: Current therapies for ITP and wAIHA are mostly symptomatic and rarely lead to durable responses after discontinuation; thus, chronic treatment is often needed, which may be associated with toxicity and substantial quality-of-life burden for patients. There is an unmet need for disease-modifying therapies that can induce and maintain durable responses beyond treatment completion in ITP and wAIHA. BAFF is an important regulator of B-cell differentiation, proliferation and survival through interactions with BAFF-R. Autoreactive B cells play a key role in the pathophysiology of ITP and wAIHA and are fueled by increased BAFF pathway activity; therefore, there is a strong rationale for investigating BAFF-R as a target in both diseases. Ianalumab is a fully human mAb that targets BAFF-R. It has a novel dual mechanism of action: blockade of BAFF-R-mediated signaling and potent depletion of B cells mediated by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Ianalumab has shown favorable safety and encouraging efficacy in other indications, including SjS, SLE and CLL, and is a promising potential treatment for ITP and wAIHA. As ianalumab is being investigated in ongoing, blinded Phase III trials in ITP and wAIHA, we present the safety profile of ianalumab from completed Phase I/II studies in SjS, SLE or CLL. Methods: Data for patients with SjS were from a randomized Phase IIb trial (NCT02962895); patients (N=190) received subcutaneous (SC) placebo or ianalumab 5, 50 or 300 mg every 4 weeks (wks) for 24 wks. Patients then entered a second treatment period; patients in the ianalumab 5 or 50 mg arm continued the same dose, patients in the ianalumab 300 mg arm were randomized to continue the same dose or receive placebo, and patients in the placebo arm switched to ianalumab 150 mg. Safety data in patients with SLE were collected from a randomized Phase II trial (NCT03656562). Patients (N=67) received SC ianalumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 wks for 28 wks; patients in the placebo group could switch to ianalumab in a 20-wk open-label extension. Data for patients with CLL were from a Phase Ib trial (NCT03400176); patients (N=32) received intravenous (IV) ianalumab 0.3, 1, 3 or 9 mg/kg every 2 wks plus ibrutinib 420 mg once daily for up to 8 28-day cycles. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs of special interest. Results: Ianalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with SjS. Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity; severe AEs were reported in 5 patients receiving ianalumab. Three ianalumab-treated patients had SAEs; 2 SAEs in 1 patient (appendicitis and tubo-ovarian abscess) were considered related to ianalumab treatment. Frequency of infections/infestations was similar between patients treated with ianalumab and placebo. Discontinuation rates were low, with only 4 patients discontinuing ianalumab for non-serious AEs (infection [n=2], lymphopenia, local injection-site reaction [n=1 each]); no SAEs led to treatment discontinuation. Ianalumab continued to be well tolerated in the second treatment period. There were no dose-dependent differences in the rate of AEs except for injection-site reactions (mostly local and not severe). In ianalumab-treated patients with SLE, there were no serious infections during the blinded period; only 1 SAE (renal impairment) was reported. In the open-label extension, 4 SAEs were reported. No SAEs in the blinded period or open-label extension were considered treatment related. Most AEs in patients with CLL were Grade 1 or 2 and not correlated with dose. Twelve patients experienced Grade ≥3 AEs; decreased neutrophil count (n=5) was most common. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Discussion: Data from patients with SjS, SLE or CLL receiving ianalumab for up to 52 wks show it has a favorable safety profile. There was a low risk of infections irrespective of dosing regimen. No cases of hypogammaglobulinemia were clinically significant in any trial. New treatments are needed for ITP and wAIHA that have disease-modifying potential and allow patients to achieve and maintain high response rates after a short therapeutic course. Ianalumab has the potential to address this unmet need and is currently being assessed as an IV dose every 4 wks in Phase III trials as both a first- (VAYHIT1 [NCT05653349]) and second-line (VAYHIT2 [NCT05653219]) treatment for ITP and as a second-line treatment for wAIHA (VAYHIA [NCT05648968]).

Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma in real life: confirmed effectiveness and contrasted effect on sputum eosinophilia versus exhaled nitric oxide fraction - PROMISE.

Randomised controlled trials have shown that benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid dose and improves asthma control and lung function in severe eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this study was to confirm results of randomised controlled trials in real life in a population of 73 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab for at least 12 months. Patients underwent careful monitoring of asthma exacerbations, exhaled nitric oxide fraction, lung function, asthma control and quality of life questionnaire responses and sputum induction, and gave a blood sample at baseline, after 6 months and then every year. We found significant reductions in exacerbations (by 92%, p<0.0001) and oral corticosteroid dose (by 83%, p<0.001) after 6 months that were maintained over time, with 78% of patients able to stop oral corticosteroid therapy. Patients improved their Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (from 11.7±5.1 to 16.9±5.35, p<0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (from 2.88±1.26 to 1.77±1.32, p<0.0001) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (+1.04, p<0.0001) at 6 months and this was maintained during follow-up. Only 35% and 43% of patients reached asthma control according to an ACT score ≥20 and ACQ score <1.5, respectively. We observed stable post-bronchodilation lung function over time and a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil count, with 85% of patients exhibiting sputum eosinophil counts <3% after 6 months (p<0.01) with no effect on exhaled nitric oxide fraction. In our real-life study, we confirm the results published in randomised controlled trials showing a sharp reduction in exacerbations and oral corticosteroid therapy, an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, and a dramatic reduction in sputum eosinophil count.

Protocol for the EACH trial: a multicentre phase II study evaluating the safety and antitumour activity of the combination of avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 agent, and cetuximab, as any line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) in the UK

IntroductionHead and neck cancer is the eighth most common cancer in the UK. Current standard of care treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma (HNSCC) is...