Receiving Cyclosporine Microemulsion Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Immunodynamics of Basiliximab in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients on Mycophenolate Mofetil Comedication

The aim of this substudy within a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was to assess the pharmacokinetics and immunodynamics of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant recipients on comedication with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Eighty-two patients aged 3 to 18 years, receiving cyclosporine microemulsion, MMF, corticosteroids, and basiliximab or placebo were investigated. Basiliximab serum concentrations were determined by ELISA, CD25+, and CD122+ T lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Basiliximab clearance adjusted to body surface area was significantly (P<0.05) greater in children versus adults, but the relatively higher basiliximab dose given to children yielded similar exposure compared with adolescents. A cross-study comparison revealed that MMF reduced basiliximab clearance and prolonged CD25 saturation duration from approximately 5 weeks in the absence of MMF to 10 weeks in the presence of MMF. Basiliximab led to a marked reduction of CD25+ T-cell fraction during the first 8 to 10 weeks posttransplant, but did not specifically affect CD122+ T cells. The majority of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) were observed after interleukin (IL) 2-R desaturation, whereas about a quarter of BPARs occurred despite adequate IL2-R blockade. The currently recommended basiliximab dose for pediatric patients, when used with cyclosporine microemulsion and corticosteroids, yielded adequate drug exposure in children and adolescents also under MMF comedication. The observation that about a quarter of BPARs occurred despite adequate IL2-R blockade suggests that another T-cell activation pathway independent of the IL-2/IL-2R pathway is operative, for example, the IL-15 signaling pathway.

Impact of Immunosuppressive Treatment on Endothelial Biomarkers After Kidney Transplantation

Endothelial dysfunction occurs in hemodialysis and kidney-transplanted patients and can be enhanced by immunosuppressive therapy. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC), endothelial microparticles (EMP) and sVCAM-1 provide information on endothelium activation and damage. We compared the impact of two immunosuppressive regimens (CsA/Aza vs. Tac/MMF) on the kinetics of CEC, EMP and sVCAM-1 levels in 52 patients, both before graft and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after graft, in reference to 50 healthy controls. CEC, EMP and sVCAM-1 levels were significantly decreased 1 year after transplantation (M12) as compared to pretransplant values. At M12, CEC and sVCAM-1 levels were significantly higher than those of controls whereas EMP reached normal values. Nine months postgraft, lower CEC and normalized EMP levels were found in patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion/ azathioprine (CsA/Aza) when compared to patients treated with tacrolimus/ mycophenolate mofetil (Tac/MMF). Multivariate analysis evidenced positive correlations between CEC and history of cardiovascular diseases and between EMP and cytomegalovirus infection at M12. In conclusion, our combined analysis of endothelial injury markers confirms the favorable impact of renal transplantation on endothelium, and show that CEC levels discriminate treatment-associated endothelial toxicity. These results enlighten the potential of these noninvasive blood biomarkers in indexing vascular injury and optimize therapeutic options.

Basiliximab Versus Daclizumab Combined With Triple Immunosuppression in Deceased Donor Renal Graft Recipients

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101 ± 28 μmol/L with basiliximab and 109 ± 41 μmol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.

Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a French multicentre observational study

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM)-a common complication of kidney transplantation-is associated with increases in graft loss, morbidity and mortality. This is a purely observational study of 527 patients taking a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), based on data collected at a single routine visit 6-24 months after kidney transplantation. Diabetes was defined according to ADA/WHO guidelines. The mean age of the patients was 47.2 years and 61.1% were men; 49.5% were receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) and 50.5% tacrolimus (Tac). NODM developed in 7.0% after a median interval of 1.6 months. In CsA-ME-treated patients, the unadjusted cumulative risks of NODM were 5.5% and 8.4% at 1- and 2-year post-transplantation, while in Tac-treated patients, the risks were respectively 17.4% and 21%. Four independent risk factors (RFs) were identified by multivariate analysis: maximum lifetime body mass index>25 [odds ratio (OR)=5.1], pre-transplantation impaired fasting glucose (OR=4.7), hepatitis C status (OR=4.7) and Tac vs CsA-ME treatment (OR=3.0). NODM is associated with certain RFs present prior to kidney transplantation, and with treatment with Tac as opposed to CsA-ME.

Tolerability of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium to 1 Year in Combination With Cyclosporine and Corticosteroids in Renal Transplant Recipients

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil, but delays release of mycophenolic acid until it reaches the small intestine. De novo renal transplant patients taking part in a 12-month, multicenter, randomized study received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME, early or delayed to day 6), EC-MPS, steroids, and interleukin-2 antagonist induction. Tolerability data relating to EC-MPS are reported. Ninety-seven patients were randomized to early CsA-ME and 100 patients to delayed CsA-ME. Median daily dose of EC-MPS was 1440 mg at all time points throughout the 12-month period. The most frequently reported adverse events were constipation, anemia, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain, leukopenia, and cytomegalovirus infection; there were four malignancies. Fifty patients (24.6%) discontinued EC-MPS prematurely by 12 months, including 42 patients (84%) who discontinued owing to adverse events. No patient discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal adverse events. Two-thirds of patients (137 [67.5%]) maintained full EC-MPS dose throughout the 12-month study and did not require any dose reduction or dose interruption. EC-MPS is well tolerated in de novo renal transplant recipients when administered in combination with CsA-ME and steroids, with low rates of dose reductions or interruptions. Gastrointestinal adverse events were responsible for dose reduction or interruption in only 5% of patients.

New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Incidence and Risk Factors in Kidney Transplantation: Results of the Observational Cross-Sectional Study Diapason

Background New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is a frequent complication of kidney transplantation. Data on NODM are mainly available in the United States. A study was implemented in a French population of kidney transplants. The incidence and risk factors of NODM were analysed. Diabetes was defined according to American Diabetes/World Health Organization guidelines. Methods Diapason is an observational cross-sectional study of 527 kidney transplant patients from 17 units based on data collected at a single routine visit 6 to 24 months after kidney transplantation. Results The mean age of the patients was 47.2 years, and 61.1% were men; 49.5% were receiving cyclosporine microemulsion and 50.5% tacrolimus. NODM developed in 7.0% after a median interval of 1.6 months. Univariate analysis identified six pretransplantation risk factors: advanced age, impaired fasting glucose, at least two cardiovascular risk factors, hepatitis C status, maximums lifetime body mass index above 25, and tacrolimus or cyclosporine therapy. Four independent factors were identified by multivariate analysis: body mass index above 25 (OR = 5.1), pretransplantation impaired fasting glucose (OR = 4.7), hepatitis C status (OR = 4.7), and tacrolimus versus cyclosporine treatment (OR = 3.0). Conclusions NODM is associated with risk factors present prior to kidney transplantation and with treatment with tacrolimus as opposed to cyclosporine. Therefore, the choice of calcineurin inhibitor should be based on the patient’s overall risk profile.

Cyclosporine exposure and calcineurin phosphatase activity in living-donor liver transplant patients: Twice daily vs. once daily dosing

We have compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cyclosporine between once- and twice-daily dosing regimens in de novo patients of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A total of 14 patients were enrolled in this study, who had received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) twice a day (BID, n = 5) or once daily in the morning (QD, n = 9) after transplantation. On postoperative day (POD) 6, the QD regimen significantly increased cyclosporine exposure; the blood concentration at 2 hours postdose (C2) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for 4 hours (AUC(0-4)), compared with the BID regimen. Moreover, the area under the calcineurin (CaN) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells time-curve (AUA) for 12 hours (AUA(0-12)) and 24 hours (AUA(0-24)) were decreased by approximately 42 and 25% with the QD regimen relative to the BID regimen, respectively. The C2 level was significantly correlated with the AUC(0-4) (r2 = 0.95), which was negatively related to the AUA(0-12) with a large interindividual variability (r(2) = 0.59). However, a significant correlation was found between the AUA(0-12) or AUA(0-24) and CaN activity at trough time points. According to a maximum inhibitory effect attributable to the drug (E(max)) model, the mean estimates of E(max) and the C(b) value that gives a half-maximal effect (EC50) for CaN inhibition were not significantly different between the 2 groups, respectively. These findings suggest that a once daily morning administration of cyclosporine may improve oral absorption and help to provide an effective CaN inhibition early after LDLT. Furthermore, CaN activity at trough time points would be a single surrogate predictor for the overall CaN activity throughout dosing intervals following cyclosporine administration.

Three‐Year Efficacy and Safety Results from a Study of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in de novo Renal Transplant Patients

Everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/day was compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day in a randomized, multicenter 36-month trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA) and corticosteroids. The study was double-blind until all patients had completed 12 months, then open-label. By 36 months, graft loss occurred in 7.2, 16.7 and 10.7% of patients in the everolimus 1.5, 3 mg/day, and MMF groups, respectively (p = 0.0048 for everolimus 1.5 mg/day vs. 3 mg/day); efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up) occurred in 33.0, 38.9 and 37.2% of patients (p = 0.455 overall), respectively. Mortality and incidence of BPAR were comparable in all groups. Creatinine values were higher in everolimus groups, requiring a protocol amendment that recommended lower CsA exposure. Diarrhea, lymphocele, peripheral edema and hyperlipidemia were more common among everolimus-treated patients, whereas viral infections, particularly cytomegalovirus infection, increased in the MMF group. Overall safety and tolerability were better with MMF and everolimus 1.5 mg/day than with everolimus 3 mg/day. In conclusion, at 36 months, an immunosuppressive regimen containing everolimus 1.5 mg/day had equivalent patient, and graft survival and rejection rates compared with MMF in de novo renal transplant recipients, whereas everolimus 3 mg/day had inferior graft survival. Renal dysfunction in everolimus cohorts necessitates close monitoring.

Effects of Calcineurin Inhibitors on Sirolimus Pharmacokinetics During Staggered Administration in Renal Transplant Recipients

To compare the effects of different calcineurin inhibitors on sirolimus pharmacokinetics during long-term, staggered administration in kidney transplant recipients. Design. Randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial. A medical center and one of its teaching hospitals in Taiwan. Twenty-two de novo kidney transplant recipients. Patients received cyclosporine microemulsion or tacrolimus capsules twice/day in combination with once-daily sirolimus solution and corticosteroids. Sirolimus was administered 6 hours after the morning dose of cyclosporine or tacrolimus. After receiving a 6-mg loading dose of sirolimus, participants received sirolimus 2 mg/day for at least 7 days. Neither the cyclosporine nor the tacrolimus dosage was adjusted for at least 3 days before and during blood sampling for pharmacokinetic profiling. One patient dropped out because of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-related hepatotoxicity. We observed no differences between the two patient groups in terms of their demographic data, renal and liver function, or dosage of sirolimus during the study. During multiple-dose administration, the area under the whole-blood concentration-time curve and the peak and trough concentrations of sirolimus in the cyclosporine group were, respectively, 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.71), 1.42 (95% CI 1.08-1.76), and 1.42 (95% CI 1.09-1.76) times higher than those of the tacrolimus group, even though sirolimus was administered 6 hours after the other agents. Sirolimus pharmacokinetics may change significantly when calcineurin inhibitors are switched, even with staggered administration, which may not completely prevent a drug interaction between cyclosporine and sirolimus solution.

Results of a Three-Year Prospective Study of C2 Monitoring in Long-Term Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Cyclosporine Microemulsion

The clinical utility of C(2) monitoring of cyclosporine A microemulsion (CsA-ME) was evaluated in a prospective study of 110 patients more than 12 months posttransplant who demonstrated stable graft function and were receiving CsA-ME and steroids. Patients were converted to C(2) monitoring with the CsA-ME dose adjusted to a target C(2) range of 800 to 1,000 ng/mL and followed for 40 + 11 months. At the time of conversion, 57% of patients exceeded the C(2) target, 20% of patients were below the C(2) target, and 23% of patients were within the C(2) target range. The mean dose of CsA-ME decreased from 258 + 88 to 202 + 76 mg/day (P < 0.0001), and the mean C(2) level decreased from 1,052 + 292 ng/mL to 896 + 233 ng/mL (P < 0.0002). There were no episodes of rejection. At last follow-up, 7.3% of patients had developed chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Use of antihypertensive agents decreased significantly (P = 0.0004), and mean total cholesterol decreased from 6.4 + 1.3 to 5.8 + 1.1 (P = 0.0009) after adoption of C(2) monitoring. These findings suggest that conversion of maintenance renal transplant recipients from C(0) to C(2) monitoring of CsA-ME offers the clinical benefits of better control of hypertension and dyslipidemia, with effective protection against chronic renal allograft dysfunction. A target C(2) range of 800 to 1,000 ng/mL in maintenance patients receiving CsA-ME dual therapy seems appropriate.

Potential value of high-dose mizoribine as rescue therapy for ongoing acute humoral rejection

Mizoribine (MZ) inhibits the proliferation of lymphocytes selectively via inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, like mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The clinical dosage of MZ (2-5 mg/kg) is much lower than that of MMF (20-60 mg/kg). The purpose of this study was to examine whether high-dose MZ would be effective for treatment of acute humoral rejection. Renal transplantation was performed in a different pig strain combination. Group 1 (n = 2) received no treatment. Group 2 (n = 4) received cyclosporine microemulsion (6 mg/kg) and prednisolone (0.1 mg/kg) as baseline immunosuppression. Groups 3 (n = 4), 4 (n = 4) and 5 (n = 4) were additionally treated with MZ for rescue therapy, 30, 10 and 3 mg/kg, respectively, immediately after rejection was observed. All pigs developed acute vascular rejection between days 4 and 8. Complete reversal of acute rejection including reduction of elevated serum creatinine, suppression of anti-donor antibody production and pathological finding, was obtained in 3/4 (group 3), 1/4 (group 4) and 0/4 (group 5). Rescue with high-dose MZ (30 mg/kg) reversed ongoing acute humoral rejection. Such a high dose of MZ was tolerable for pigs. However, leukocytopenia was observed when MZ trough level was maintained over 10 mug/ml. Treatment with high-dose MZ would be applicable to a clinical trial, if blood level is carefully monitored.

Safety Assessment of the Conversion From Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

The immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept) has greatly improved transplant recipients' clinical outcomes, but its efficacy may be limited by dose adjustments due to adverse events (AEs). An enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic), designed to improve gastrointestinal tolerability is now available. This Latin-American, prospective, multicenter, open-label, 6-month trial assessed the safety and tolerability of converting renal transplant recipients from MMF to EC-MPS. In total, 237 renal transplant recipients (stable ≥ 3 months' posttransplant) receiving MMF (≤1000 mg b.i.d.) were enrolled. Adults (n = 218) were converted to EC-MPS 720 mg b.i.d. (equimolar to MMF 1000 mg b.i.d.) even if they were initially receiving <1000 mg MMF b.i.d. (ie, 47 adults received a higher than equimolar dose of EC-MPS). Children (n = 19) were converted to EC-MPS 450 or 432 mg/m 2 b.i.d. Patients also received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and corticosteroids. There were three acute rejections and no graft failures. The incidence of AEs was 59.9% (in those receiving a higher than equimolar EC-MPS dose it was 57.4%). In all, 22% of patients had gastrointestinal AEs, 37% had infections, and 4.8% had hematological AEs. Only 24 patients (10%) had an AE-related dose reduction. Seven of these patients had received higher than equimolar doses of EC-MPS. Patients can be safely converted from different doses of MMF to a standard dose of EC-MPS. The requirement for EC-MPS dose reduction to manage AEs was relatively low. Use of EC-MPS is a valid alternative for renal transplant recipients receiving maintenance MMF treatment.

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial to Compare Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism in Patients Receiving Cyclosporine Microemulsion Versus Tacrolimus After De Novo Kidney Transplantation

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is associated with increased risk of graft failure and death in renal transplant recipients. Some clinical studies have indicated that NODM risk is higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, but no comparative trial has used American Diabetic Association (ADA)/World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Incidence After Renal Transplantation, Neoral C 2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus (DIRECT) study is a 6-month open-label, multicenter trial comparing the impact of tacrolimus and Neoral (cyclosporine microemulsion) on glucose metabolism in 700 de novo kidney transplant recipients, based on ADA/WHO criteria. Patients are randomized to tacrolimus (C 0 monitoring) or Neoral (C 2 monitoring), stratified by baseline diabetic status and ethnicity. All patients receive basiliximab, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate acid ( myfortic). Pooled interim 3-month results from a subset of 115 patients receiving either tacrolimus or Neoral showed that the primary efficacy end-point (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss or death) occurred in 11 patients (10%). There were four graft losses and only one death, which occurred after graft loss. Eight patients experienced BPAR (7.3%). Among 99 patients who were nondiabetic at baseline, 14 developed NODM by month 3, 17 developed impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and another 5 patients received hypoglycemic treatment for at least 14 consecutive days or at the month 3 visit, resulting in a 36% incidence of impaired glucose metabolism. At 3 months, median GFR (Nankivell) was 63.7 mL/min; median serum creatinine was 137 μmol/L. Full complete results are expected in December 2005.

The effect of maintenance immunosuppression medication on the change in kidney allograft function

The optimum maintenance immunosuppression regimen for kidney transplant recipients is uncertain. In this study we determined the effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the rate of kidney allograft function loss defined by the annualized change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We studied 40,963 first kidney only transplant recipients between 1987 and 1996 with allograft survival of at least two years in the United States Renal Data System. Linear regression methods were applied to serial GFR estimates after transplantation to determine the annualized change in GFR. Patients were classified according to the type of maintenance calcineurin and purine metabolism inhibitor received after transplantation. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent effect of maintenance immunosuppression medications on the annualized change in GFR (mL/min/1.73m2/year). Compared to patients who received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), a slower decline in GFR was observed in tacrolimus-treated patients (1.60 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.22-1.97, P < 0.001) and patients who did not receive calcineurin inhibitors (0.82 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.08-1.56, P= 0.03). In contrast, compared to compared to patients who received Neoral, a faster decline in GFR was observed in patients who received the original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine (Sandimmune) (-0.16 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.003 to -0.32, P= 0.04) and patients with unknown calcinuerin inhibitor exposure (-2.11 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -2.27 to -1.95, P < 0.001). Compared to patients who received azathioprine, patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had a slower decline in GFR (0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 0.14-1.08, P= 0.01) and patients with unknown purine metabolism inhibitor exposure had a faster decline in GFR (-0.61 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.47, P < 0.001.) In a subgroup analysis of patients who received a transplant after 1993, the decline in GFR was slower for tacrolimus compared to neoral treated patients (1.64 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI 1.15-2.14, P < 0.001) but was not different for MMF compared to azathioprine-treated patients (0.24 mL/min/1.73m2/year, 95% CI -0.38-0.85, P= 0.45). Tacrolimus and MMF were the calcineurin inhibitor and purine metabolism inhibitor associated with the most favorable effects on rates of change in allograft function. Because most transplant recipients establish a low baseline level of allograft function, the effect of immunosuppression medication on GFR decline should be considered when selecting a maintenance immunosuppression regimen.

Long-Term predictive value of cyclosporine microemulsion C 2 level for chronic renal allograft dysfunction

This observational study was undertaken in maintenance renal transplant recipients to assess the relationship between cyclosporine C 2 and the long-term risk of chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Pharmacokinetic profiling was undertaken twice yearly in 79 patients with stable graft function receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. Mean time since transplantation at study entry was 56 ± 49 months posttransplant. At the end of the observational period (mean 43 ± 14 months) 24 patients (30%) had developed CRAD, defined as proteinuria > 500 mg/24 hours associated with a rising serum creatinine and confirmed by graft biopsy. There were no significant differences at baseline between patients who did vs did not develop CRAD, except for reduced incidence of acute rejection in CRAD-free patients. The cyclosporine AUC was significantly higher among patients without CRAD (5707 ng · h/mL vs 3994 ng · h/mL, P = .0007). Mean C 2 was also significantly higher: 1001 ng/mL in the CRAD-free group versus 640 ng/mL in the CRAD group ( P = .002). There was no significant difference in C 0. Regression analysis showed that the best predictors for the occurrence of CRAD were a low AUC (relative risk [RR] 1.54, P < .0001), a low C 2 (RR 1.30, P < .0001) and proteinuria (RR 4.95, P < .0001). Probability of freedom from CRAD was 90% for C 2 > 900ng/mL. C 2 appears to be a superior strategy to C 0 monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients with regard to the risk of CRAD. C 2 values above 900 ng/mL are appropriate to minimize the risk of CRAD among patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion and steroids.

Lack of economic benefit with basiliximab induction in living related donor adult renal transplant recipients.

To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic. Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients. The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab-CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow-up. At 12-months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were dollar 51,970.01 and dollar 68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower (dollar 10,148.50 vs dollar 21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US). Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost-effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.