Received Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Research Articles

Abstract Su703: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation after Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A NEMSIS Database Study

Introduction: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of death in the United States, with upwards of 360,000 OHCAs annually. Receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) almost doubles an individual’s odds of survival compared to those who don’t receive bystander CPR. Unfortunately, in the US, bystander application of CPR only occurs in 40% of OHCA. Improving the rate of bystander CPR and AED use will improve survival rates for OHCA. Minoritized populations experience worse outcomes from OHCA. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, they are less likely to survive to hospital discharge. A cross-sectional study of witnessed OHCA patients found that Black and Hispanic patients had lower rates of bystander CPR. Less is known about disparities in care for Asian American persons who experience OHCA. Studies using the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry (ROC) and the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) have concluded discrepant results, with ROC finding that Asian Americans were less likely to receive bystander CPR and CARES finding that they were just as likely to receive bystander CPR compared to non-Hispanic Whites. To that end, we sought to evaluate the association between bystander CPR and Asian race after witnessed OHCA. Objective: To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and the odds of receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (bCPR) after witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: Data were obtained from the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) database for adults (≥18 years) with a witnessed non-traumatic OHCA in the year 2022. Patients were separated into two groups: Non-Hispanic White and Asians. The primary outcome was the odds of receiving bCPR. Exclusions included traumatic etiology, do-not-resuscitate orders, and arrests witnessed by healthcare providers. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to test significance. Results: A total of 73,215 witnessed OHCA activations were included in this study. Overall, bystander CPR rates were lower for the Asian group (59.8%) compared to the Non-Hispanic White group (65.0%). Pearson’s chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between the bCPR rates of the Asian group and Non-Hispanic White group, with a p-value of less than 0.001. Conclusion: Racial/ethnic disparities exist for Asian individuals in the odds of receiving bCPR after a witnessed non-traumatic OHCA.

Abstract Su707: Sex Differences in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival to Hospital Discharge for Public Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in North Carolina and Singapore

Introduction: Although it is known that women are less likely than men to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) in public, few studies have examined differences in receipt of BCPR and survival to hospital discharge for public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) by patient sex between distinct regions. Objectives: We assessed if patient sex was associated with BCPR (primary outcome) and survival to hospital discharge (secondary outcome) for public OHCAs in North Carolina (NC) and Singapore (SG). We hypothesized that females in both regions would have lower receipt of BCPR and were less likely to survive to hospital discharge compared with men. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival dataset (NC, 2013-2022) and Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (SG, 2010-2020). We excluded pediatric, traumatic, emergency medical services (EMS) witnessed cases, arrests in healthcare facilities and residential cases. Using logistic regression, we examined the association of sex with BCPR and survival to hospital discharge controlling for potential confounding variables such as age, race and the year of arrest. Results: There were 65,627 OHCAs in NC; upon exclusion 6,828 remained (78% males; mean age: 57±15, males, 54.7±18, females). In SG, there were 24,177 OHCAs; upon exclusion 3,617 cases remained (87% males; mean age: 57±14, males, 61±16.4, females). In NC, public BCPR rates were 48% for males and 44% for females. Females had a 13% adjusted lower odds of receiving less BCPR (adjusted OR 0.87 (CI 0.77, 0.99)). In SG, BCPR rates were 59% for males and 52% for females. Similarly, females had a 22% lower adjusted odds of receiving BCPR (adjusted OR 0.78 (CI 0.62, 0.98)). In NC, survival to hospital discharge rates for public OHCAs were 24% for males and 26% for females. Females had a 17% lower adjusted odds ratio of survival to hospital discharge compared to males (adjusted OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.01, 1.35)). In SG, public survival to hospital discharge rates were 12% for males and 9% for females. Females had a 36% adjusted lower odds of survival to hospital discharge compared to males (adjusted OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.94)). Conclusion: In public OHCAs, females were less likely to receive BCPR than males in both regions. However, females were less likely to survive to hospital discharge in SG, whereas the opposite was seen in NC. Further research is needed to elucidate factors for these differences.

Incidence and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Train Stations in Denmark.

Following international guidelines, communities have deployed automated external defibrillators at train stations without substantive evidence. We geocoded public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) (2016-2020), automated external defibrillators, and train stations. The stations were divided into the following groups according to passenger flow: 1 (0-499), 2 (500-4999), 3 (5000-9999), and 4 (>10 000) passengers per day. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using Poisson regression of rates, and odds ratios (ORs) were analyzed through logistic regression. OHCAs at train stations accounted for 102 (2.3%) of 4467 public OHCAs. The incidence rate (IR) and RR for OHCAs were for group 1: IR, 0.02 OHCA per station per year, RR, 1.0 (reference); group 2: IR, 0.07, RR, 4.1 (95% CI, 2.3-7.3); group 3: IR, 0.25, RR, 12.7 (95% CI, 6.2-25.9); and group 4: IR, 0.34, RR, 16.3 (95% CI, 8.6-30.9). Compared with other public OHCAs, OHCAs at train stations were just as likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.60-2.12]). However, they had higher odds of bystander defibrillation (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.06-2.58]), were more likely to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.24-2.85]), and survive 30 days (OR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.57-3.59]). The incidence of OHCAs at train stations was associated with passenger flow, with the busiest stations having a 16-fold higher risk of OHCAs than the lowest. OHCAs at train stations had better outcomes compared with other public OHCAs.

Sex and 30-day survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Scotland 2011–2020

BackgroundDifferences in 30-day survival between males and females following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are well documented. Biological sex does not appear to be responsible for this survival gap independently of potential mediating factors. We investigated the role of potential mediating factors in the association between sex and 30-day survival after OHCA in Scotland.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adult non-emergency medical services (EMS)-witnessed OHCA cases was conducted. We included incidents from the whole of Scotland where resuscitation was attempted by the Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) between April 1, 2011 and March 1, 2020. Logistic regression was used to assess the contribution of age, socioeconomic status, urban–rural location of the incident, initial cardiac rhythm, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and location of the arrest (home or away from home).ResultsThe cohort consisted of 20,585 OHCA cases (13,130 males and 7,455 females). Median (IQR) age was 69 years (22) for males versus 72 years (23) for females. A higher proportion of males presented with initial shockable rhythm (29.4% versus 12.4%) and received bystander CPR (56.7% versus 53.2%) compared with females. A higher proportion of females experienced OHCA at home (78.8% versus 66.8%). Thirty-day survival after OHCA was higher for males compared with females (8.2% versus 6.2%). Males had higher age-adjusted odds for 30-day survival after OHCA than females (OR, 1.26; (95% CI), 1.12–1.41). Mediation analyses suggested a role for initial cardiac rhythm and location of the arrest (home or away from home).ConclusionMales had higher age-adjusted 30-day survival after OHCA than females. However, after adjusting for confounding/mediating variables, sex was not associated with 30-day survival after OHCA. Our findings suggest that initial cardiac rhythm and location of the arrest are potential mediators of higher 30-day OHCA survival in males than females. Improving proportions of females who present with initial shockable rhythm may reduce sex differences in survival after OHCA.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

AimsCurrent data are insufficient for the leading resuscitation societies to advise on the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The aim of this study was to explore the current utilization of ECPR for pediatric OHCA and characterize the patient demographics, arrest features, and metabolic parameters associated with survival. MethodsRetrospective review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry database from January 2020 to May 2023, including children 28 days to 18 years old who received ECPR for OHCA. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. ResultsEighty patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 8.8 years [2.0–15.8] and 53.8% of patients were male. OHCA was witnessed for 65.0% of patients and 46.3% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Initial rhythm was shockable in 26.3% of patients and total CPR duration was 78 min [52–106]. Signs of life were noted for 31.3% of patients and a cardiac etiology precipitating event was present in 45.0%. Survival to discharge was 29.9%. Initial shockable rhythm was associated with increased odds of survival (unadjusted OR 4.7 [1.5–14.5]; p = 0.006), as were signs of life prior to ECMO (unadjusted OR 7.8 [2.6–23.4]; p < 0.001). Lactate levels early on-ECMO (unadjusted OR 0.89 [0.79–0.99]; p = 0.02) and at 24 h on-ECMO (unadjusted OR 0.62 [0.42–0.91]; p < 0.001) were associated with decreased odds of survival. ConclusionsThese preliminary data suggest that while overall survival is poor, a carefully selected pediatric OHCA patient may benefit from ECPR. Further studies are needed to understand long-term neurologic outcomes.

Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for layperson bystanders on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective multicenter observational study

BackgroundEffective bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. However, the effect of CPR training on the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) among laypersons has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. MethodsThis prospective, multicenter observational study was conducted across 42 centers in Japan. We assessed OHCA patients who received bystander CPR from a layperson, excluding those performed by healthcare staff. The primary outcome was the ROSC rate. Secondary outcomes included pre-hospital ROSC, ROSC after hospital arrival, favorable neurological outcomes, and 30-day survival. Propensity score with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounders, including age, sex, presence or absence of witnesses, and past medical history. ResultsA total of 969 OHCA patients were included, divided into CPR-trained (n = 322) and control (n = 647). Before adjustment, the ROSC rate was higher in the trained group than the control (40.1% vs. 30.1%, P < 0.01). After IPTW adjustment, the trained group showed a significantly higher ROSC rate (36.7% vs. 30.6%; P = 0.02). All secondary outcomes in the trained group were significantly improved before adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, the trained group showed improved rates of pre-hospital ROSC and ROSC after hospital arrival (30.7% vs. 24.0%; P < 0.01, 23.9% vs. 20.7%; P = 0.04). There were no differences in neurological outcomes and 30-day survival. ConclusionThis study demonstrated that CPR training for laypersons was associated with increased ROSC rates in OHCA patients, indicating potential advantages of CPR training for non-healthcare professionals.

Walking time to nearest public automated external defibrillator for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a major U.S. city

BackgroundHow frequently out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs within a reasonable walking distance to the nearest public automated external defibrillator (AED) has not been well studied. MethodsAs Kansas City, Missouri has a comprehensive city-wide public AED registry, we identified adults with an OHCA in Kansas City during 2019–2022 in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. Using AED location data from the registry, we computed walking times between OHCAs and the nearest registered AED using the Haversine formula, a mapping algorithm to calculate walking distance in miles from one location to another. Results were stratified by OHCA location (home vs. public) and by whether the patient received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). ResultsOf 1,522 OHCAs, 1,291 (84.8%) occurred at home and 231 (15.2%) in public. Among at-home OHCAs, 634 (49.1%) received bystander CPR and no patients had an AED applied even as 297 (23.0%) were within a 4-minute walk to the closest public AED. Among OHCAs in public, 108 (46.8%) were within a 4-minute walk to the closest public AED. For public OHCAs within a 4-minute walk, bystanders applied an AED in 13 (12.0%) of these cases and in 24.5% (13/53) of those who received bystander CPR. ConclusionIn one U.S. city with a publicly available AED registry, there were no instances in which a bystander accessed a public AED for an OHCA at home. For OHCAs in public, nearly half occurred within a 4-minute walk to the closest AED but bystander use of an AED was low.

Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcome in Vietnam.

Patients experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) frequently do not receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In this study we sought to determine the prevalence of OHCA patients in Vietnam who received bystander CPR and its effects on survival outcomes. We performed a multicenter, retrospective observational study of patients (≥18years) presenting with OHCA at three major hospitals in an LMIC from February 2014-December 2018. We collected data on the hospital and patient characteristics, the cardiac arrest events, the emergency medical services (EMS) system, the therapy methods, and the outcomes and compared these data, before and after pairwise 1:1 propensity score matching, between patients who received bystander CPR and those who did not. Upon admission, we assessed factors associated with good neurological survival at hospital discharge in univariable and multivariable logistic models. Of 521 patients, 388 (74.5%) were men, and the mean age was 56.7years (SD 17.3). Although most cardiac arrests (68.7%, 358/521) occurred at home and 78.8% (410/520) were witnessed, a low proportion (22.1%, 115/521) of these patients received bystander CPR. Only half of the patients were brought by EMS (8.1%, 42/521) or private ambulance (42.8%, 223/521), 50.8% (133/262) of whom had resuscitation attempts. Before matching, there was a significant difference in good neurological survival between patients who received bystander CPR (12.2%, 14/115) and patients who did not (4.7%, 19/406; P < .001). After matching, good neurological survival was absent in all OHCA patients who did not receive CPR from a bystander. The multivariable analysis showed that bystander CPR (adjusted odds ratio: 3.624; 95% confidence interval 1.629-8.063) was an independent predictor of good neurological survival. In our study, only 22.1% of total OHCA patients received bystander CPR, which contributed significantly to a low rate of good neurological survival in Vietnam. To improve the chances of survival with good neurological functions of OHCA patients, more people should be trained to perform bystander CPR and teach others as well. A standard program for emergency first-aid training is necessary for this purpose.

Assessing the readability, reliability, and quality of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to the 100 most searched queries about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An observational study.

This study aimed to evaluate the readability, reliability, and quality of responses by 4 selected artificial intelligence (AI)-based large language model (LLM) chatbots to questions related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This was a cross-sectional study. Responses to the 100 most frequently asked questions about CPR by 4 selected chatbots (ChatGPT-3.5 [Open AI], Google Bard [Google AI], Google Gemini [Google AI], and Perplexity [Perplexity AI]) were analyzed for readability, reliability, and quality. The chatbots were asked the following question: "What are the 100 most frequently asked questions about cardio pulmonary resuscitation?" in English. Each of the 100 queries derived from the responses was individually posed to the 4 chatbots. The 400 responses or patient education materials (PEM) from the chatbots were assessed for quality and reliability using the modified DISCERN Questionnaire, Journal of the American Medical Association and Global Quality Score. Readability assessment utilized 2 different calculators, which computed readability scores independently using metrics such as Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Fog Readability and Automated Readability Index. Analyzed 100 responses from each of the 4 chatbots. When the readability values of the median results obtained from Calculators 1 and 2 were compared with the 6th-grade reading level, there was a highly significant difference between the groups (P < .001). Compared to all formulas, the readability level of the responses was above 6th grade. It can be seen that the order of readability from easy to difficult is Bard, Perplexity, Gemini, and ChatGPT-3.5. The readability of the text content provided by all 4 chatbots was found to be above the 6th-grade level. We believe that enhancing the quality, reliability, and readability of PEMs will lead to easier understanding by readers and more accurate performance of CPR. So, patients who receive bystander CPR may experience an increased likelihood of survival.

Does Single Dose Epinephrine Improve Outcomes for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Bystander CPR or a Shockable Rhythm?

Background A single dose epinephrine protocol (SDEP) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) achieves similar survival to hospital discharge (SHD) rates as a multidose epinephrine protocol (MDEP). However, it is unknown if a SDEP improves SHD rates among patients with a shockable rhythm or those receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods This pre-post study, spanning 11/01/2016-10/29/2019 at 5 North Carolina EMS systems, compared pre-implementation MDEP and post-implementation SDEP in patients ≥18 years old with non-traumatic OHCA. Data on initial rhythm type, performance of bystander CPR, and the primary outcome of SHD were sourced from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. We compared SDEP vs MDEP performance in each rhythm (shockable and non-shockable) and CPR (bystander CPR or no bystander CPR) subgroup using Generalized Estimating Equations to account for clustering among EMS systems and to adjust for age, sex, race, witnessed arrest, arrest location, AED availability, EMS response interval, and presence of a shockable rhythm or receiving bystander CPR. The interaction of SDEP implementation with rhythm type and bystander CPR was evaluated. Results Of 1690 patients accrued (899 MDEP, 791 SDEP), 19.2% (324/1690) had shockable rhythms and 38.9% (658/1690) received bystander CPR. After adjusting for confounders, SHD was increased after SDEP implementation among patients with bystander CPR (aOR 1.61, 95%CI 1.03-2.53). However, SHD was similar in the SDEP cohort vs MDEP cohort among patients without bystander CPR (aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.60-1.09), with a shockable rhythm (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.48-1.91), and with a non-shockable rhythm (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 0.89-1.77). In the adjusted model, the interaction between SDEP implementation and bystander CPR was significant for SHD (p = 0.002). Conclusion Adjusting for confounders, the SDEP increased SHD in patients who received bystander CPR and there was a significant interaction between SDEP and bystander CPR. Single dose epinephrine protocol and MDEP had similar SHD rates regardless of rhythm type.

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex – The role of arrest recognition

PurposeTo assess whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differed by patient sex among bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of paramedic-attended OHCA in New South Wales (NSW) between January 2017 to December 2019 (restricted to bystander-witnessed cases). Exclusions included OHCA in aged care, medical facilities, with advance care directives, from non-medical causes. Multivariate logistic regression examined the association of patient sex with bystander CPR. Secondary outcomes were OHCA recognition, bystander AED application, initial shockable rhythm, and survival outcomes. ResultsOf 4,491cases, females were less likely to receive bystander CPR in private residential (Adjusted Odds ratio [AOR]: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70–0.95) and public locations (AOR: 0.58, 95%CI:0.39–0.88). OHCA recognition during the emergency call was lower for females arresting in public locations (84.6% vs 91.6%, p = 0.002) and this partially explained the association of sex with bystander CPR (∼44%). This difference in recognition was not observed in private residential locations (p = 0.2). Bystander AED use was lower for females (4.8% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001); however, after adjustment for location and other covariates, this relationship was no longer significant (AOR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60–1.12). Females were less likely to be in an initial shockable rhythm (AOR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.44–0.61), but more likely to survive the event (AOR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15–1.56). There was no sex difference in survival to hospital discharge (AOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.77–1.19). ConclusionOHCA recognition and bystander CPR differ by patient sex in NSW. Research is needed to understand why this difference occurs and to raise public awareness of this issue.

A case of pulmonary visceral subpleural hematoma treated by hematoma evacuation during care of post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BackgroundThe occurrence of pulmonary visceral subpleural hematoma during care of post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation including chest compressions and anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies is extremely rare. Also, there are few reports of treatment of visceral subpleural hematoma, most of which are treated by lung resection. Here we describe a rare case that pulmonary visceral subpleural hematoma arose during post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation care and was treated by hematoma evacuation.Case presentationA 58-year-old male with no smoking history and, past medical histories of rheumatoid arthritis, chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia developed ventricular fibrillation due to myocardial infarction and fainted. He received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation by the ambulance crew and had return of spontaneous circulation. After transfer to our hospital, the patient underwent percutaneous catheter intervention and stenting with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction, followed by anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. On the 8th hospital day, chest radiography suggested right lower lobe pneumonia, and subsequent chest computed tomography revealed pulmonary hematoma in the visceral subpleural area from S6 to S10. Since no improvement was observed in hypoxemia, treatment was considered necessary. First, an attempt at computed tomography-guided drainage of hematoma was made, but insertion of the Pig-tail catheter was difficult due to hardness of the hematoma. Next, evacuation of hematoma was performed on the 13th hospital day. The hematoma was located in the visceral subpleural area and was removed by incising the pleura. TachoSil Tissue Sealing sheet and Polyglycoal acid sheet were applied to the sites of air leakage and oozing after hematoma evacuation. No re-bleeding or air leakage was observed after the treatment, and the patient was discharged on the 26th hospital day after an uneventful course.ConclusionsPulmonary visceral subpleural hematoma may occur during post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation care, including chest compressions and anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. In our case, CT-guided puncture and drainage was difficult and surgical treatment by incision of the visceral pleura and hematoma evacuation alone was done successfully.

Examining the Impact of Layperson Rescuer Gender on the Receipt of Bystander CPR for Women in Cardiac Arrest.

Women who suffer a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) less often than men. To understand this phenomenon, we queried whether there are differences in deterrents to providing CPR based on the rescuer's gender. Participants were surveyed using a national crowdsourcing platform. Participants ranked the following 5 previously identified themes as reasons: rescuers are afraid to injure or hurt women; rescuers might have a misconception that women do not suffer cardiac arrest; rescuers are afraid to be accused of sexual assault or sexual harassment; rescuers have a fear of touching women or that their touch might be inappropriate; and rescuers think that women are faking it or being overdramatic. Participants were adult US residents able to correctly define CPR. Participants ranked the themes if the rescuer was gender unidentified, a man, and a woman, in variable order. In November 2018, 520 surveys were completed. The respondents identified as 42.3% women, 74.2% White, 10.4% Black, and 6.7% Hispanic. Approximately half (48.1%) of the cohort knew how to perform CPR, but only 7.9% had ever performed CPR. When the rescuer was identified as a man, survey participants ranked fear of sexual assault or sexual harassment and fear of touching women or that the touch might be inappropriate as the top reasons (36.2% and 34.0% of responses, respectively). Conversely, when the rescuer was identified as a woman, survey respondents reported fear of hurting or injuring as the top reason (41.2%). Public perceptions as to why women receive less bystander CPR than men were different based on the gender of the rescuer. Participants reported that men rescuers would potentially be hindered by fears of accusations of sexual assault/harassment or inappropriate touch, while women rescuers would be deterred due to fears of causing physical injury.

Characteristics and outcomes of cardiac arrest patients with prolonged resuscitation

Background: There is lack of uniformity and consensus amongst the emergency physicians about an appropriate duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and resuscitative efforts before deciding about termination of resuscitation (TOR) in patients with either out-of-hospital or in the emergency department (ED) non-traumatic cardiac arrests. An ideal duration of resuscitation for those with persistent cardiac arrest has not been determined yet. This study aims to evaluate the resuscitative interventions, patient factors and outcomes associated with prolonged duration of resuscitation in these patients. Methods: A retrospective study conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of Changi General Hospital, Singapore and included 15 non-consecutive and randomly selected adult patients who either had an out-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or suffered a witnessed cardiac arrest soon after arrival in the ED and were resuscitated further. Results: The median age was 58 years (IQR 51.5–70.5 years), and the median total CPR and resuscitation duration was 46 min (IQR 40–62.5 min). 12 patients sustained ROSC and one had transient ROSC. Ten (10) patients survived to hospital admission from ED and 5 of them underwent emergency angiography from ED. Three patients were discharged from hospital eventually with mRS scores of 0–1. Conclusion: Patients with sustained ROSC were older, had more prevalence of co-morbidities and lesser prevalence of shockable rhythms, received bystander CPR and pre-hospital adrenaline more frequently, had longer total duration of CPR and a larger proportion were administered intravenous calcium gluconate during ED resuscitation.

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Management of the Comatose Adult Patient With an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death, accounting for ≈50% of all cardiovascular deaths. The prognosis of such individuals is poor, with <10% surviving to hospital discharge. Survival with a favorable neurologic outcome is highest among individuals who present with a witnessed shockable rhythm, received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, achieve return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of arrest, and have evidence of ST-segment elevation on initial ECG after return of spontaneous circulation. The cardiac catheterization laboratory plays an important role in the coordinated Chain of Survival for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The catheterization laboratory can be used to provide diagnostic, therapeutic, and resuscitative support after sudden cardiac arrest from many different cardiac causes, but it has a unique importance in the treatment of cardiac arrest resulting from underlying coronary artery disease. Over the past few years, numerous trials have clarified the role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest. This scientific statement provides an update on the contemporary approach to managing resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Frequency of Bystander Intervention in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.

Rapid administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can significantly increase patient survival following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Through this study, we aimed to determine if the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the likelihood of OHCAvictims receiving bystander-initiated CPR prior to EMS arrival. We used data collected by the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) for years 2019 and 2020. Data was filtered to include only cases of OHCA where the status of bystander CPR was listed. We used a chi-squareanalysis to compare frequencies of patients receiving both bystander CPR and standard EMS interventions versus patients receiving only standard EMS interventions for the years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic declaration (2019 and 2020, respectively). Of the 577,011 cases that met our inclusion criteria, 228,259 occurred in 2019 and 348,752 occurred in 2020. The frequency of OHCA cases that reported bystander-initiated CPR prior to EMS arrival significantly decreased from 2019 to 2020 (53.7% vs. 52.5%, P<.001). Bystanders are often the first to administer CPR following a cardiac arrest. It was found that the likelihood of an OHCA victim receiving bystander CPR decreased from 2019 to 2020.

2022: Are We Back to the pre-COVID-19 Pandemic Period in the Management of out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest?

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant strain on the Emergency system, particularly for time-dependent diseases like Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). Studies have shown an increase in the incidence of OHCA during different waves of the pandemic, but there is limited evidence on how survival rates and rescue efforts have been affected in the post-pandemic period. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of all OHCA rescues by AREU (Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza), in the Lombardy region in March in three different years (2019, 2021 and 2022). We used rescue mission data collected in AREU’s database, where logistic information of patient rescue missions managed by the Lombardy Region’s 112 system is recorded.Results: This study was an epidemiology analysis of OHCA after the pandemic. The results showed no significant changes in the probability of receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (22.5% vs 24.0%; p=0.41) and public access defibrillation (3.6 vs 3.2; p=0.50) compared to pre-pandemic period. However, there was a decrease in the probability of ROSC (11.5% vs 6.2%; p&lt;0.01).Conclusion: According to our analysis, there appears to be a return to the pre-pandemic phase with regard to the OHCA network. However, it remains to be pointed out that a careful study of disease networks is essential to understand the resilience of our health system and to understand whether we have returned to a system similar to the pre-pandemic phase after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in residential aged care facilities is independently associated with lower survival in Perth, Australia

AimTo compare out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) characteristics and outcomes between people aged ≥ 65 years who arrested in a residential aged care facility (RACF) versus a private residence in Perth, Australia. MethodsWe undertook a retrospective cohort study of OHCA cases attended by emergency medical services (EMS) in Perth, January 2018-December 2021. OHCA patient and event characteristics and survival outcomes were compared via univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between residency type and (i) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at emergency department (ED) and (ii) 30-day survival. ResultsA total of 435 OHCA occurred in RACFs versus 3,395 in private residences. RACF patients were significantly older (median age: 86 [IQR 79, 91] vs 78 [71, 85] years; p < 0.001), more commonly female (50.1% vs 36.8%; p < 0.001), bystander-witnessed arrests (34.9% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001), received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (42.1% vs 28.6%; p < 0.001), had less shockable first monitored rhythms (4.0% vs 8.1%; p = 0.002) and more frequently had a “do not resuscitate” order identified (46.0% vs 13.6%; <0.001). Among those with EMS-attempted resuscitation or with defibrillation before EMS arrival, ROSC at ED and 30-day survival were significantly lower in the RACF group (6.2% vs 18.9%; p < 0.001 and 1.9% vs 7.7%; p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of ROSC at ED (aOR: 0.22 [95%CI: 0.10, 0.46]) and 30-day survival (aOR: 0.20 [95%CI 0.05, 0.92]) were significantly lower for RACF residents. ConclusionRACF residency was an independent predictor of lower survival from OHCA, highlighting the importance of end-of-life planning for RACF residents.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes when law enforcement arrives before emergency medical services

BackgroundLaw enforcement (LE) professionals are often dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) to provide early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) application with mixed evidence of a survival benefit. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate LE care in OHCA. MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of adults with non-traumatic OHCA not witnessed by EMS and without bystander AED use from 2018-2021. Our primary outcome was survival with Cerebral Perfusion Category score ≤ 2 (functional survival). Our exposures included: LE On-scene Only (without providing care); LE CPR Only (without applying an AED); LE Ideal Care (ensuring CPR and AED application). Our control group had no LE arrival before EMS. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for confounders and stratified our analyses by patients with and without bystander CPR. ResultsThere were 2569 adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from 2018-2021 meeting inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the odds of functional survival for LE On-scene Only (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.28 [0.47–3.45]), LE CPR Only (1.26 [0.80–1.99]), or LE Ideal Care (1.36 [0.79–2.33]). In patients without bystander CPR, LE Ideal Care had significantly higher odds of functional survival (2.01 [1.06–3.81]) compared to no LE on-scene, with no significant associations for LE On-scene Only or LE CPR Only. There were no significant differences by LE care in patients already receiving bystander CPR. ConclusionsLE arrival before EMS and ensuring both CPR and AED application is associated with significantly improved functional survival in OHCA patients not already receiving bystander CPR.

A machine learning algorithm to predict a culprit lesion after out of hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract Background Between 50-90% of patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a primary cardiac aetiology of arrest with the presence of a culprit coronary lesion. However, recent trials have failed to show a benefit from an early invasive angiographic approach following OHCA. Identification of patients with high likelihood of a culprit lesion may enable selection of patients likely to benefit from direct conveyance to cardiac arrest centres and for an early invasive approach. However, electrocardiogram (ECG) following return of spontaneous circulation, the current gold-standard, is a poor predictor of presence of a culprit lesion. Purpose We aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm to predict the presence of a culprit lesion in patients with OHCA. Methods We used a retrospective cohort of 398 patients admitted with primary cardiac aetiology OHCA to a tertiary cardiology centre in the United Kingdom, between May 2012 and December 2017. The primary outcome was the presence of a culprit coronary artery lesion, for which a Gradient Boosting model was optimised to predict. The algorithm was then validated in two independent European cohorts comprising 568 patients (346 and 222 patients respectively). Results The development cohort consisted of 398 patients (median age 64.3 years [IQR 53.3-75.4], 74.6% male), and the two validation cohorts consisted of 346 patients (median age 63.0 years [IQR 55.0-73.0], 81.5% male) and 222 patients (median age 63.0 years [IQR 52.0-74.0], 77.0% male). Of all patients, 85.6% had a witnessed arrest, 69.6% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 77.3% had an initial shockable rhythm. A culprit lesion was observed in 67.4% patients receiving early coronary angiography in the development cohort, and 67.9% and 61.1% in the two validation cohorts respectively. A Gradient Boosting model yielded an algorithm, named KOCAR Culprit Predictor, incorporating nine variables including age, a localising feature on ECG (≥2mm of ST change in contiguous leads), regional wall motion abnormality, history of vascular disease and initial shockable rhythm. This model had an AUC of 0.89 in the development and 0.83/0.81 in the validation cohorts with good calibration (Figure 1), and outperformed the current gold-standard ECG alone (AUC 0.69/0.67/0/67). Conclusions A novel simple machine learning derived algorithm (Figure 2) combining nine variables which are readily available to clinicians can be applied to patients with OHCA to predict a culprit coronary artery lesion with high accuracy. The algorithm, KOCAR Culprit Predictor, outperforms the current gold-standard ECG alone.Figure 1Figure 2