Abstract

Background: There is lack of uniformity and consensus amongst the emergency physicians about an appropriate duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and resuscitative efforts before deciding about termination of resuscitation (TOR) in patients with either out-of-hospital or in the emergency department (ED) non-traumatic cardiac arrests. An ideal duration of resuscitation for those with persistent cardiac arrest has not been determined yet. This study aims to evaluate the resuscitative interventions, patient factors and outcomes associated with prolonged duration of resuscitation in these patients. Methods: A retrospective study conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of Changi General Hospital, Singapore and included 15 non-consecutive and randomly selected adult patients who either had an out-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or suffered a witnessed cardiac arrest soon after arrival in the ED and were resuscitated further. Results: The median age was 58 years (IQR 51.5–70.5 years), and the median total CPR and resuscitation duration was 46 min (IQR 40–62.5 min). 12 patients sustained ROSC and one had transient ROSC. Ten (10) patients survived to hospital admission from ED and 5 of them underwent emergency angiography from ED. Three patients were discharged from hospital eventually with mRS scores of 0–1. Conclusion: Patients with sustained ROSC were older, had more prevalence of co-morbidities and lesser prevalence of shockable rhythms, received bystander CPR and pre-hospital adrenaline more frequently, had longer total duration of CPR and a larger proportion were administered intravenous calcium gluconate during ED resuscitation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call