Received Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

A Threshold Technique Study to Understand Patient Preference for Smooth Versus Textured Breast Implants.

Breast implant surfaces are categorized as smooth or textured. Compared with smooth implants, textured surface implants have a higher risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) but may have a lower risk of capsular contracture (CC). This study aimed to quantify whether survey respondents would be willing to accept a higher risk of BIA-ALCL in exchange for the potential reported benefits of textured breast implants. We fielded a threshold technique survey to 405 respondents from 4 cohorts: (1) patients with breast cancer who were considering but did not receive reconstruction with implants, (2) patients with breast cancer who had received reconstruction with implants, (3) persons considering breast augmentation with implants, and (4) patients who had received breast augmentation with implants. The average maximum increase in the risk of BIA-ALCL that the survey respondents were willing to accept in exchange for textured implants-with both a teardrop-shaped option and a 10% reduction in the risk of CC-were as follows: 0.83% for patients who were considering breast reconstruction, 0.61% for patients who had received breast reconstruction, 0.85% for persons considering breast augmentation, and 0.60% for patients who had received breast augmentation. We found respondents generally were willing to accept the higher risk of BIA-ALCL associated with textured implants to gain the potential benefit of reduced risk of CC and the option of the teardrop-shaped implant. Patient perspectives and preferences are integral, and continued assessment of patient perspectives can help inform regulatory and care paradigms.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer after Mastectomy with or without Breast Reconstruction

Introduction: There is ongoing debate about the safety of breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who have undergone total mastectomy (TM). More and more LABC patients are undergoing breast reconstruction after TM, but its long-term survival outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of LABC patients who underwent breast reconstruction after TM with those who did not, based on a large sample. Methods: We collected data for all LABC patients who underwent TM with or without breast reconstruction in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We divided patients into two groups: TM group and total mastectomy with reconstruction (TM+R) group. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to eliminate imbalances of baseline data between the two groups. Data were analyzed using χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Result: We identified 39,112 eligible patients (33,169 patients received TM and 5,943 received TM+R), and 8,680 patients were matched after PSM (4,340 patients received TM and 4,340 received TM+R). Patients with middle age, white, married, lived in urban, IIB–IIIA stage, invasive ductal carcinoma, pathological grade II–III, hormone receptor-positive, and undergone chemotherapy were more likely to receive breast reconstruction. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better OS and BCSS in the TM+R group versus the TM group (OS: p < 0.001; BCSS: p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TM+R significantly improved OS and BCSS (OS: hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.68, 0.79], p < 0.001; BCSS: 95% CI [0.79, 0.94], p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with old age, white, and hormone receptor-positive had better OS and BCSS by TM+R compared to TM. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction after TM is associated with better OS and BCSS in patients with LABC.

Impact of Regional Surgeon Competition on Use, Cost, and Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction in the United States.

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy is underused in the United States. Evidence suggests that more competitive hospital markets offer increased access to procedural care across specialties. This study aims to determine the impact of regional plastic surgeon competition on use, outcomes, and cost of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using Marketscan claims data from 2009 to 2020. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a measure of market concentration, was calculated using the sum-of-squares of the proportion of breast reconstruction cases performed by each surgeon in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify differences in rates, outcomes, and costs of reconstruction by HHI. Odds of receiving breast reconstruction within two years of mastectomy were higher for those in moderately competitive (OR: 1.51 [95% CI: 1.37 to 1.66]; p<0.001) or competitive (OR: 1.71 [95% CI: 1.58 to 1.86]; p<0.001) = regions compared to noncompetitive regions. Patient out-of-pocket costs decreased when comparing moderately competitive regions to noncompetitive regions (-$67.38, [95% CI: -$88.65 to -$46.11]; p=0.007), and further decreased when comparing competitive to non-competitive regions (-$113.06, [95% CI: -$137.00 to -$89.12]; p=0.02). No linear association between total, surgeon, or facility cost and market competition strata was identified. Greater competition among surgeons is associated with improved access to reconstructive surgery, but no difference in cost. Application of this evidence may include system-level strategies to bolster care coordination, while targeting drivers of cost, such as hospitals and hospital systems, through policy.

Recurrence of breast cancer after reconstruction with macro-textured silicone breast implants: a retrospective cohort study.

Recently, old concerns linking silicone breast implants (SBIs) with breast cancer have resurfaced. These concerns apply specifically to the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients who received breast reconstructions with macro-textured SBIs. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of breast reconstruction with macro-textured SBIs on long-term oncologic outcomes of breast cancer patients. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study in two large cancer centres in the Netherlands. Patients who had been treated for primary breast cancer between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 were included. Data on treatment and oncologic outcomes were obtained from prospectively maintained institutional and nationwide registries. Patient files were reviewed manually to complement missing information. Missing data were accounted for by multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE). Reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI was analysed as a time-dependent variable. The main outcomes of interest were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Of the 4695 women who were eligible for inclusion, 2393 had undergone mastectomy. Of these women, 1187 (25%) had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI. The mean follow-up time was 11.5 (SD, 5.0) years. Compared with women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction, women with an implant-based reconstruction did not differ significantly in LRRFS or DMFS after accounting for various confounding factors [HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.93-1.72) and HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.74-1.20), respectively]. Sensitivity analysis in complete cases of patients and various subgroup analyses yielded similar results. Reassuringly, in this multi-centre cohort study no difference was found in long-term oncologic outcomes between women who had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI and women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction.

Trunk Muscle Function and Core Stability in Women Who Had Muscle-Sparing Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The long-term effects of the unilateral muscle-sparing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAMmsp) flap procedure on trunk muscle performances and core stability were investigated in women with breast cancer. Forty women (mean age = 42.6years) who had received breast reconstruction with the unilateral TRAMmsp flap procedure no less than 6months earlier (mean = 10.3 [standard deviation, SD = 4.9] months) (TRAM group) participated, and 30 women who were healthy and matched for age (mean age = 41.2years) served as controls (control group). Their abdominal and back muscle strength was assessed using the curl-up and prone extension tests, respectively, and their static abdominal muscle endurance and back extensor endurance were assessed using the sit-up endurance test in the crook-lying position and the Biering-Sørensen test, respectively. Core stability strength was assessed using a 4-level limb-lowering test (abdominal muscle test), and core stability endurance was assessed while lying supine with both flexed legs 1 inch off the mat while keeping the pelvis in a neutral position with a pressure biofeedback unit. Compared with the control group, trunk muscles of the TRAM group were weaker, showing less endurance, as were their core stability strength and endurance. Static trunk muscle endurances and trunk flexion strength were associated with core stability in both groups. Women exhibit trunk flexor and extensor weakness along with poor endurance and impaired core stability even after an average of 10months from receiving the TRAMmsp flap procedure. Immobilization after surgery, with possible systemic inflammatory effects from surgery and chemotherapy, might have further contributed to the generalized weakness subsequent to the partial harvesting of the rectus abdominis. Women after breast reconstruction with the TRAMmsp flap procedure show long-lasting deficits of strength and endurance in abdominal muscles, back extensors, and core stability. Proactive measures including early detection and evaluation of impairments as well as timely intervention targeting these clients are important to minimize the dysfunction and support their return to community participation.

Postoperative Scar Management Using Laser Therapy for Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Flap.

Postoperative scar formation is inevitable, and a gold standard management has not been established to date. Due to the fact long and large scar formation occurs in reconstructive surgery, this study analyzed the relationship between various factors in patients who received breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi (LD) flap to investigate appropriate and effective management approaches. Twenty-seven patients who underwent breast reconstruction between June 2014 and January 2015 received laser therapy on their LD donor site at the Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. Scar evaluation was performed on both the surgical scar and intact skin on the contralateral side. Scar evaluation was conducted at five specific points, 2 cm from the midpoint of the scar on each side. Laser treatment was performed at 4-week intervals, and patients were then followed-up for 6 months. To assess scars, gross images were taken using the same settings. In addition, spectrophotometry was used for color assessment, durometer for texture and pressure evaluation, and Vernier calipers and height gauges for a more precise and objective approach. The mean age of the participants was 45.7 years, and the mean body mass index was 22.1 kg/m2 The operator-evaluated scar scale scores were 107.2 and 97.3 in the experimental and control groups, respectively. In the patient-rated questionnaire, the scores were 62.3 and 59.4 in the experimental and control groups, respectively. When analyzing early-stage postoperative scars based on various factors, laser therapy is considered a very useful scar management approach. Additionally, when performing reconstructive surgery, tension force is regarded as a significant factor to take into account since it affects scar widening.

Individualized 3D-printed bolus promotes precise postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients receiving breast reconstruction.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D-printed tissue compensations in breast cancer patients receiving breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). We enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. The dose distribution of target and skin, conformability, and dose limit of organs at risk (OARs) were collected to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed bolus. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation injury classification was used to evaluated the skin toxicities. A total of 30 patients diagnosed between October 2019 to July 2021 were included for analysis. Among all the patients, the 3D-printed bolus could ensure the dose coverage of planning target volume (PTV) [homogeneity index (HI) 0.12 (range: 0.08-0.18)], and the mean doses of D99%, D98%, D95%, D50%, D2% and Dmean were 4606.29cGy, 4797.04cGy, 4943.32cGy, 5216.07cGy, 5236.10cGy, 5440.28cGy and 5462.10cGy, respectively. The bolus demonstrated an excellent conformability, and the mean air gaps between the bolus and the chest wall in five quadrants were 0.04cm, 0.18cm, 0.04cm, 0.04cm and 0.07cm, respectively. In addition, the bolus had acceptable dosage limit of OARs [ipsilateral lung: Dmean 1198.68 cGy, V5 46.10%, V20 21.66%, V30 16.31%); heart: Dmean 395.40 cGy, V30 1.02%, V40 0.22%; spinal cord planning risk volume (PRV): Dmax 1634 cGy] and skin toxicity (grade 1, 76.0%; grade 2, 21.0%; grade 3, 3.3%). The 3D-printed bolus offers advantages in terms of dose uniformity and controllable skin toxicities in patients receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. Further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the 3Dprinted bolus in this patient subset.

Associated Factors and Prevention of Upper Pole Rippling in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Background Despite its many advantages, prepectoral breast reconstruction also carries the risk of implant rippling. The recent introduction of partial superior implant coverage using a pectoralis muscle slip in prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has shown the potential to minimize upper pole rippling. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with rippling and the effectiveness of our surgical technique. Methods In total, 156 patients (186 breasts) who underwent prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction between August 2019 and March 2021 were identified retrospectively. Patient data were analyzed from medical records. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were performed to contextualize the risks associated with rippling deformity relative to demographic characteristics and other clinical factors. Retrospective propensity-matched analysis was performed to identify the relationship between rippling deformity and the reconstruction method. Results Patients with body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR], 0.736; p < 0.001), those with a postoperative chemotherapy history (OR, 0.324; p = 0.027) and those who received breast reconstruction via the superior coverage technique (OR, 0.2; p = 0.004), were less likely to develop rippling deformity. The median follow-up period was 64.9 weeks, and there were no significant differences between patients in types of mastectomy, implant, or acellular dermal matrix. Patients who underwent superior coverage technique-based reconstruction showed significantly reduced rippling (OR, 0.083; p = 0.017) Conclusion Patients with higher BMI and prior postoperative chemotherapy were less likely to develop rippling deformity. The superior coverage technique can be effective in minimizing upper pole rippling.

Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.

Over the years, plastic surgery has acquired a central role in the integrated treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction using the prepectoral approach has emerged as an alternative to reconstruction using the subpectoral technique to overcome the complications arising from this type of surgery resulting as a consequence of muscle elevation. The satisfaction and quality of life of patients undergoing DTI breast reconstruction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire, comparing the prepectoral and the subpectoral technique. A single-center cross-sectional study on patients who underwent mastectomy and DTI breast reconstruction at our institution between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. Eighty-one patients were included and mainly divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure: 52 patients undergoing a subpectoral breast reconstruction approach and 29 patients receiving a prepectoral breast reconstruction. In order to assess the quality of life, the postoperative BREAST-Q module was administered electronically to the enrolled patients. Higher scores in BREAST-Q domains were recorded from patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique: psychosocial well-being (P<0.0085), sexual well-being (P<0.0120), physical well-being: lymphoedema (P<0.0001) and satisfaction with information received (P<0.0045). There were further statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to postoperative complications (p<0.0465) and the need for reoperation (p<0.0275). Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction with prepectoral technique were more satisfied in terms of psychosocial, sexual and also physical well-being. These patients also had statistically lower complications and reoperations compared to patients who received breast reconstruction with the subpectoral technique. This journal requires that authors 38 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 39 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 40 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 41 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Bibliometric analysis of global research on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer from 2011 to 2021.

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world, and most patients require a mastectomy. Women who have undergone mastectomy often suffer from breast loss that seriously affects their daily life, and breast reconstruction is not only beneficial to patient's quick recovery after surgery, but also their mental health. So, in recent years, more and more female breast cancer patients are receiving breast reconstruction surgery. We aim to map hot trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer and provide directions for future research. We screened all literature (2011-2021) on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer from The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and analyzed research trends in this field using Vosviewer and CiteSpace. Based on the search results, a total of 3404 articles related to breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer were screened. The US (n=1371) is the country with the highest number of articles, followed by Italy (n=282) and the UK (n=277). Harvard University (n=183) was the institution with the highest number of publications, followed by the University of Texas (n=141) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n=136). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery is the most published journal in the field. Pusic AL is the most published author in the field, while Matros E is the most cited author on average. Cluster analysis showed that breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer is a hot topic of research by scholars, and more and more experts recommend breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients. This study comprehensively summarizes and analyzes global research trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. In the past 10 years, there has been a significant increase in relevant high-quality publications in this field, and the field of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer has a promising future.

Anatomical types and anastomosis methods of concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery

To summarize the anatomical types of the concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery and the corresponding choice of anastomosis methods, and to evaluate the indications and safety of various methods. Between October 2015 and June 2021, 296 female patients received breast reconstruction with autologous free lower abdominal flap, including 154 cases of immediate breast reconstruction and 142 cases of delayed breast reconstruction. The average age of the patients was 36.5 years, ranged from 26 to 62 years. Unilateral free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap transplantation was performed in 172 cases, and unilateral free muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap transplantation was performed in 124 cases. The internal thoracic vessels were selected as the recipient vessels in all cases. The length of vascular pedicle ranged from 9.5 to 13.0 cm, with an average of 11.2 cm. The concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery included three anatomical types: one-branch type in 26 cases (8.8%), two-branch type in 180 cases (60.8%), and Y-shaped structure in 90 cases (30.4%). Anastomosis of inferior epigastric artery was performed with the proximal end of internal thoracic artery, while that of vein should be adjusted according to the diameter, length, wall thickness, and branches of the vein. The specific classification of venous anastomosis included: ① The sole concomitant vein of deep inferior epigastric artery was anastomosed with the internal mammary vein (26 cases); ② The two concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery were anastomosed with the internal mammary vein respectively (151 cases); ③ The larger one of two concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery was anastomosed with the internal mammary vein, and the other one was ligated and discarded (29 cases); ④ The two concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery were Y-shaped, and the common trunk segment was directly anastomosed with the internal mammary vein (31 cases); ⑤ The smaller branch of the concomitant veins of Y-shaped structure was ligated, and the thicker branch was anastomosed with the internal mammary vein (17 cases); ⑥ The concomitant veins of Y-shaped structure were anastomosed with the internal mammary veins respectively (42 cases). Among the patients who underwent venous anastomosis according to scheme ④, 3 cases had venous crisis of flap after operation, of which 1 case was successfully rescued by emergency exploration; the other 2 cases had flap necrosis, of which 1 case survived after being repaired by pedicled latissimus dorsi flap, and 1 case closed the wound directly. Flaps with other venous anastomosis protocols survived completely. All 296 patients were followed up 12-70 months, with an average of 37.5 months. The reconstructed breast has good shape, good elasticity, and no skin flap contracture. The donor site of the flap only left linear scar, and the abdominal wall function was not affected. The method of direct anastomosis of concomitant veins of deep inferior epigastric artery with Y-shaped structure is relatively risky, and the vessels are prone to be twisted and compressed, leading to the occurrence of venous crisis. It can improve the safety of surgery if only one large vein is anastomosed or two veins are separated to anastomose respectively.

Dynamic changes in quality of life, psychological status, and body image in women who underwent a mastectomy as compared with breast reconstruction: an 8-year follow up.

Surgical decisions and methods of surgery highly influence long term QoL for breast cancer (BC) survivors. This study is aimed towards an exploration of the dynamic changes in quality of life (QoL), anxiety/depression status, and body image (BI) among women with BC who received a mastectomy compared with those receiving breast reconstruction (BR) within an 8-year follow-up period. Women with major BC surgeries were invited to complete the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF), the European quality of life five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), and a body image scale within 8years of surgery. Kernel smoothing methods were applied to describe dynamic changes in QoL, anxiety/depression, and BI at different time points. Linear mixed effects models were constructed to identify the interaction between time, different types of surgery, and the determinants of QoL in these patients. After 1:10 propensity score matching, a total of 741 women who had undergone a BR and mastectomy were included. The BR group exhibiteda high WHOQOL QoL score one to five years after surgery with some fluctuations. The mastectomy group had comparatively stable QoL scores on WHOQOL items and were less depressed/anxious. The BR group generally showed fluctuating, higher BI scores two years after surgery, but they exhibited more anxiety/depression during follow up for 8years. Medical comorbidities, the status of anxiety/depression, and BI were the major factors influencing all domains and items of the WHOQOL BREF among women with BC. The mastectomy group showed a decreased trend toward depression in patients with BC. The BR group showed a significant improvement in QoL in the first 5years with massive fluctuations. These findings should be considered and discussed in patient participatory decision-making and promotion of QoL for breast cancer survivors.

Frequency of reoperation in patients who underwent breast reconstruction using Allergan implants after an interview about breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Background In recent years, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has emerged as an important concern. At our institution, patients who received breast reconstruction using Allergan implants were informed individually about BIA-ALCL. The present study analyzed correlations between patients’ level of satisfaction with their breast shape and whether they chose to undergo reoperation (implant removal or replacement).Methods Breast reconstruction with Allergan implants was performed between December 2014 and April 2018. In total, 107 patients were interviewed, excluding those who had died, were unreachable, or had already undergone reoperation. The mean follow-up period was 53 months (range, 26–73 months).Results After the interviews, 68 patients postponed reoperation, 29 had their implant replaced, and 10 had their implant removed. Nearly one-fifth (18.9%) of patients who were satisfied with their breast shape (13 out of 69) underwent reoperation due to anxiety over ALCL. Meanwhile, 68.4% of patients who were not satisfied due to capsular contracture or scar contracture (26 out of 38) underwent reoperation. Sixteen of the 30 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (53.3%) chose to undergo reoperation.Conclusions Satisfaction with the cosmetic outcomes of implant placement played a meaningful role in patients’ decisions to undergo reoperation. This tendency may be linked to postoperative radiotherapy, which is a major contributor to complications such as contracture. Nonetheless, a substantial proportion of patients who were satisfied with the outcomes chose to undergo reoperation due to concerns regarding ALCL.

P54. ANALYSIS OF RACE IN IMMEDIATE POST MASTECTOMY BREAST RECONSTRUCTIONFROM 2017 TO 2021

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to analyze national and regional trends of post mastectomy breast reconstruction and determine if any disparities exist. METHODS: The Vizient Clinical Database was reviewed for ICD10 diagnoses specific for mastectomy and breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2021. Patients were organized into 2 groups. Group 1: Mastectomy alone; Group 2: Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Reconstructive procedures were further divided into autologous (AR) and non-autologous groups (NAR). Patients were divided by region (Northeast=NE, South=S, Midwest=MW, West=W). Demographics were analyzed between groups. One tailed t-test analysis was performed (p<0.05 was considered significant). RESULTS: A total of 24,586 mastectomies were performed. 16420 were White, 3473 Black, 1485 Asian, 2595 Other, and 613 were unable to be identified. 15,334 immediate breast reconstruction procedures were identified during the same time period. 11,018 were White, 1859 Black, 303 Asian, 1583 Other, and 157 were unable to be identified. Significantly more white patients received breast reconstruction following mastectomy (67%) compared with Black (54%), Asian (48%), Other (61%), or Unknown race (26%) (p<0.05). No significant differences were noted regionally between autologous and non-autologous procedures when comparing race (p>0.05). More NAR surgeries were performed regionally and nationally compared with AR CONCLUSION: There appears to be a racial disparity among patients who have mastectomies and those that receive immediate breast reconstruction. However, there does not appear to be racial differences when choosing a particular reconstructive technique. There are more NAR surgeries being performed regionally and nationally when compared to AR.

Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the use of biological and synthetic meshes in one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.

Biological and synthetic meshes were used to cover the damaged muscle and augment the subpectoral pocket in breast reconstruction. However, few studies have directly compared the effects of biological and synthetic meshes. This study analyzed postoperative complications and assessed the patient-reported outcomes with the use of BioDesign® Surgisis and TiLOOP Bra/TiMesh® in one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients undergoing one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction were enrolled in this study. Post-mastectomy breast reconstructions were facilitated with either Surgisis mesh or TiLOOP mesh. Complications were examined and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire (ver 2.0). The multivariate linear regression models were used for data analysis. Overall, 79 of 116 patients (68%) received breast reconstruction with Surgisis mesh and 37 (32%) with TiLOOP mesh. There was no difference in complication rates between the two groups postoperatively. But patient-reported satisfaction was higher with the use of Surgisis mesh than with TiLOOP mesh (P = 0.05). This study reported no difference between the Surgisis group and the TiLOOP group in either complication rates or most patient-reported outcomes postoperatively. Yet the assessment of patient-reported satisfaction showed preference toward Surgisis mesh, a finding with a potential implication for mesh selection.

Racial Disparities in Breast Reconstruction at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Breast reconstruction after a mastectomy is an important component of breast cancer care that improves the quality of life in breast cancer survivors. African American women are less likely to receive breast reconstruction than Caucasian women. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the reconstruction disparities we previously reported at a comprehensive cancer center by assessing breast reconstruction rates, patterns, and predictors by race. Data were obtained from women treated with definitive mastectomy between 2000 and 2012. Sociodemographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between African American and Caucasian women, and logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of reconstruction by race. African American women had significantly larger proportions of public insurance, aggressive tumors, unilateral mastectomies, and modified radical mastectomies. African American women had a significantly lower reconstruction rate (35% vs. 49%, p < 0.01) and received a larger proportion of autologous reconstruction (13% vs. 7%, p < 0.01) compared to Caucasian women. The receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was a significant predictor of breast reconstruction in Caucasian but not African American women. We identified breast reconstruction disparities in rate and type of reconstruction. These disparities may be due to racial differences in sociodemographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The predictors of breast reconstruction varied by race, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying breast reconstruction may vary in African American women. Future research should take a target approach to examine the relative contributions of sociodemographic, tumor, and treatment determinants of the breast reconstruction disparities in African American women.

The Role of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Information in Selection of Immediate Reconstruction After Modified Radical Mastectomy-A Randomized Study.

Immediate breast reconstruction has become an important supplement after modified radical mastectomy. The role of preoperative breast reconstruction information has not been widely popularized in China. It may play an important role in choosing immediate breast reconstruction. In this paper, we investigated whether there was an effect of the role of preoperative breast reconstruction information on the difference about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent. From 2015 January to March 2018, newly admitted 100 patients with breast carcinoma must receive modified radical mastectomy. All these patients' conditions met the requirements of immediate breast reconstruction. Patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics were recorded. They were randomly classified into two groups (A & B). Preoperative breast reconstruction information was designed and prepared. When it came to signing operation consent, Group A received preoperative breast reconstruction information and Group B did not receive it. We recorded whether they were willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction in different groups. There was no significant difference in patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics (P > 0.05). Thirty-two patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 18 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group A when 24 patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 26 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group B. There was a statistical significance (P < 0.05) between the above two groups. Preoperative breast reconstruction information may be a vital role for explaining about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Psychological and Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Background:Patients who undergo breast cancer treatment require psychosocial and aesthetic rehabilitation. Advantages of breast reconstruction in-patient rehabilitation are well known. Oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery offers aesthetically better results, yet is often considered less safe than more radical procedures. We compared the aesthetic and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing breast reconstruction and oncoplastic breast cancer treatment.Methods:In total, 1130 patients who received either breast reconstruction or oncoplastic breast cancer surgery were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 included 510 patients who received breast reconstruction surgery. Group 2 included 620 patients who received oncoplastic surgery. The following aspects were compared between the two groups: demographics, tumor progression, and immunohistochemical aspects, complications, hospitalization stay, and psychological and aesthetic outcomes.Results:Patients in the oncoplastic group showed statistically significant higher psychosocial and aesthetic outcomes, as well as lower incidence of complications, revision rate, disease progression, and recurrence. The majority of oncoplastic patients were treated in early stages of breast cancer.Conclusion:Offering superior treatment results, oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery should be favored in patients with earlier stages of cancer progression.

A Comparison Between Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Concerning the Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer Under 50 Years of Age

surgery (BCS) to those having undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Material and Methods: Forty-four BCS and 27 MRM patients have been included in this retrospective study. All patients have completed adjuvant chemotherapies and radiation therapies. MRM patients who received breast reconstruction surgery afterwards, patients who experienced local or distant organ relapse, or patients over fifty years old have been excluded. Each patient’s quality of life has been evaluated using the Short Form 36 (SF-36), 6 months after the completion of their treatment. Results: Between BCS and MRM groups, no significant difference of age, height, weight and body mass index was observed. While the BCS group yielded better results from the SF-36 subscales, i.e. physical functioning, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions, the only measures illustrating a significant difference were vitality and mental health, in comparison of BCS with MRM group (p= 0.043 and p= 0.023, respectively). Conclusion: In the treatment of breast cancer, enhancing patients’ quality of life is just as essential as improving survivals. Our research demonstrates higher quality of life in BCS patients, highlighting the statistical difference of the vitality and mental health subscales of the SF-36, compared with the MRM group.

Diagnosis and management of toxic shock syndrome after breast reconstructive procedures with silicone implants

Breast implant insertion is one of the most commonly used methods for breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. However, infection is a common postoperative complication of implant insertion. In most cases, these infections can be managed with antibiotics and supportive therapy. However, severe septic conditions, such as toxic shock syndrome (TSS), can sometimes occur. TSS is an extremely rare but life-threatening complication, for which early diagnosis and proper management play a crucial role in determining patients’ outcome. Although only 16 cases of TSS after breast implant insertion have been reported in the literature, most of those cases involved a serious clinical course. The reason for the seriousness of the clinical course of TSS in these cases is that the initial impression and presentation of these patients are nonspecific, and patients can easily be misdiagnosed as having a simple upper respiratory infection, causing the underlying condition to be neglected. Herein, we present two patients who were diagnosed with TSS after receiving breast reconstruction surgery via a silicone implant after total mastectomy. Both patients were misdiagnosed at the initial examination since they showed no local infectious signs on the postoperative wound.