Receipt Of Tdap Research Articles

Association between acceptance of routine pregnancy vaccinations and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant patients

COVID-19 vaccination is a key approach to reduce morbidity and mortality in pregnant patients and their newborns. Anti-vaccine sentiment has recently increased with unclear impact on pregnant patients. We examined the association between acceptance of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccines, considered to be routine pregnancy vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Secondarily, we identified other predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and described pregnancy outcomes in patients who were and were not vaccinated during pregnancy. A retrospective cohort study of all patients who delivered at a single site from December 2020 - March 2022. Demographic, pregnancy, neonatal, and vaccination data were abstracted from the electronic medical record, which imports vaccine history from the California Immunization Registry. The relationship between influenza and Tdap vaccine acceptance, other baseline characteristics, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake was assessed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis. Of the 7857 patients who delivered during the study period, 4410 (56.1%) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. Of those who received the COVID-19 vaccine, 3363 (97.6%) and 3049 (88.5%) received influenza and Tdap vaccines, respectively. Patients were more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine if they had advanced maternal age, obesity, Asian race, and private insurance. After adjustment for baseline differences, COVID vaccine acceptance was associated with receipt of Tdap (aOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.90-2.33) and influenza vaccines (aOR 2.83, 95% CI 2.55-3.14). There were no differences in preterm birth, low birthweight, and NICU admission between patients who received and did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients were more likely to accept COVID-19 vaccination if they received Tdap or influenza vaccinations. Older age, obesity, Asian race, and private insurance were independent predictors of vaccine uptake. Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake bear further exploration to guide efforts in equitable and widespread vaccine distribution.

Association of Tdap vaccine guidelines with vaccine uptake during pregnancy.

In 2012, recommendations for universal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy were released. Our objective was to determine if Tdap, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccine uptake during pregnancy changed after the release of the guidelines, and identify factors associated with receiving the Tdap and influenza vaccine after 2012. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on pregnant individuals who initiated prenatal care before 20 weeks' gestation between 11/2011-11/2012 ("pre-guideline") and 12/2012-12/2015 ("post-guideline"). Vaccine uptake dates were abstracted from medical records. The pre and post-guideline cohorts were compared to determine if Tdap vaccine uptake and timing improved after the new Tdap guidelines. We additionally examined influenza and pneumococcal vaccine uptake before and after guidelines. Factors associated with receipt of the Tdap and influenza vaccine during pregnancy in the post-guideline cohort were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. Of 2,294 eligible individuals, 1,610 (70.2%) received care in the post-guideline cohort. Among the pre-guideline cohort, 47.4% received Tdap, whereas Tdap uptake increased to 86.1% after the guidelines (p<0.001). Similarly, receiving the Tdap vaccine between the recommended time of 27-36 weeks gestational age improved from 52.5% to 91.8% after the guidelines (p<0.001). Vaccine frequency for influenza improved significantly from 61.2% to 72.0% (p<0.001), while frequency for pneumococcus were low and unchanged. An increased number of prenatal visits was associated with receiving the Tdap and influenza vaccines during pregnancy (respective, aOR 1.09 95% CI 1.05-1.13; aOR 1.50 95% CI 1.17-1.94). Non-Hispanic Black individuals were less likely to receive both the Tdap and influenza vaccines during pregnancy compared to non-Hispanic White individuals (respective, aOR 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.80; aOR 0.68 95% CI 0.48-0.97). Receipt and timing of Tdap vaccine improved after implementation of the 2012 ACIP guidelines. Receipt of influenza vaccine uptake also improved during the study period, while uptake of the pneumococcal vaccine remained low. Significant racial disparities exist in receipt of Tdap and influenza vaccine during pregnancy.

Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2019.

Since 2005, a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and adults (1,2). After receipt of Tdap, booster doses of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine are recommended every 10 years or when indicated for wound management. During the October 2019 meeting of ACIP, the organization updated its recommendations to allow use of either Td or Tdap where previously only Td was recommended. These situations include decennial Td booster doses, tetanus prophylaxis when indicated for wound management in persons who had previously received Tdap, and for multiple doses in the catch-up immunization schedule for persons aged ≥7 years with incomplete or unknown vaccination history. Allowing either Tdap or Td to be used in situations where Td only was previously recommended increases provider point-of-care flexibility. This report updates ACIP recommendations and guidance regarding the use of Tdap vaccines (3).

Safety review of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) in adults aged ≥65 years, Vaccine Adverse Event reporting System (VAERS), United States, September 2010–December 2018

IntroductionThe Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends vaccination with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in persons ≥65 years of age. To date, few studies have assessed the safety of Tdap in this population. We aimed to summarize reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following receipt of Tdap in this age group. MethodsWe searched for and analyzed U.S. VAERS reports of Tdap among individuals ≥65 years of age submitted from September 1, 2010 through December 31, 2018. We classified reports according to concurrent vaccination, seriousness, and outcome (death, non-death) and determined the frequency of reported adverse events (AEs). For serious reports, we reviewed available medical records. Data mining analyses were undertaken to detect disproportionality in reporting. ResultsVAERS received a total of 1,798 reports following Tdap, of which 104 (6%) were serious. The most common AEs were injection site erythema (26%; n = 468), injection site pain (19%; n = 335), injection site swelling (18%; n = 329), and erythema (18%; n = 321). We identified seven deaths; none were attributed to Tdap. Among serious non-death reports, nervous system disorders (35.1%; n = 34) and infections and infestations (n = 18.6%; n = 18) were most commonly reported. Data mining did not identify any vaccine-AE combination reported more frequently than expected. ConclusionsWe did not identify any new safety concern over nearly a decade of recommended Tdap use among adults ≥65 years of age. Findings from this post-marketing review are consistent with prior post-marketing observations and pre-licensure studies.

Effect of Tdap upon antibody response to meningococcal polysaccharide when administered before, with or after the quadrivalent meningococcal TT-conjugate vaccine (coadministered with the 13-valent pneumococcal CRM197-conjugate vaccine) in adult Hajj pilgrims: A randomised controlled trial

Hajj pilgrims are susceptible to several serious infections and are required to receive multiple vaccinations. Polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines contain carrier proteins such as tetanus toxoid (TT), diphtheria toxoid or a mutant of diphtheria toxoid (CRM197). These carrier proteins may interact with other conjugate or combination vaccines containing tetanus or diphtheria on concurrent or sequential administration. We examined the immune interaction of separate and concomitant administration of a tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine with a TT-conjugated quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (MCV4) (coadministered with 13-valent pneumococcal CRM197-conjugate vaccine [PCV13]) in adult Australian pilgrims before attending Hajj in 2015.We randomly assigned each participant to one of three vaccination schedules. Group 1 received Tdap 3–4 weeks before receiving MCV4 coadministered with PCV13. Group 2 received all three vaccines concomitantly. Group 3 received MCV4 and PCV13 3–4 weeks before Tdap. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at each vaccination visit and 3–4 weeks after vaccination and tested for response to meningococcal serogroups C, W and Y using a serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) assay with baby rabbit complement, and to diphtheria and tetanus toxoid, measuring IgG antibodies by ELISA. Participants completed symptom diaries after each vaccination. A total of 166 participants aged 18–64 (median 42) years were recruited, of whom 160 completed the study. Compared to the other groups, Group 1 (given Tdap first) had significantly lower proportion of subjects achieving a ≥4-fold rise in rSBA for serogroup W. No difference was detected across the three groups in achieving protection threshold (rSBA ≥8 post vaccination) or SBA geometric mean titre (GMT) post vaccination.Group 3, which was given MCV4/PCV13 first, had high levels of antibody against diphtheria and tetanus than the other groups, when tested prior to receipt of Tdap; Only the anti-tetanus responses remained significantly higher after Tdap administration. No serious adverse events were reported.In conclusion, when multiple vaccination is required for Hajj pilgrims, administering Tdap concurrently with MCV4/PCV13 produces adequate immune responses, and avoids meningococcal immune interference, in the convenience of a single consultation. However, giving Tdap 3–4 weeks after MCV4/PCV13 has the advantage of an enhanced tetanus toxoid response.The trial is Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12613000536763.

Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

SummaryThis report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the United States. As a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations, this report does not contain any new recommendations and replaces all previously published reports and policy notes; it is intended for use by clinicians and public health providers as a resource. ACIP recommends routine vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. Infants and young children are recommended to receive a 5-dose series of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines, with one adolescent booster dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Adults who have never received Tdap also are recommended to receive a booster dose of Tdap. Women are recommended to receive a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, which should be administered from 27 through 36 weeks’ gestation, regardless of previous receipt of Tdap. After receipt of Tdap, adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.

Patterns of Use of Human Papillomavirus and Other Adolescent Vaccines in the United States

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to describe the patterns of use of universally recommended adolescent vaccines in the United States. MethodsWe identified 11-year-olds using the MarketScan insurance claims database (2009–2014). Human papillomavirus (HPV), tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), and meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination claims were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Generalized linear models estimated vaccination incidence rates and correlates of adolescent vaccination and timely vaccination. ResultsAmong 1,691,223 adolescents, receipt of Tdap (52.1%) and MenACWY (45.8%) vaccinations exceeded receipt of HPV vaccination (18.4%). While both sexes had similar Tdap and MenACWY vaccination proportions, girls received HPV vaccination more frequently than boys (21.9% vs. 15.1%). Adolescents received HPV vaccination later (mean age: 11.8 years) than Tdap or MenACWY vaccination (mean age: 11.2 years for both). Half of vaccinated adolescents received Tdap and MenACWY vaccination only; however, coadministration with HPV vaccine increased with birth cohort. Western adolescents had the highest incidence rates of HPV vaccination, and Southern adolescents had the lowest. Rural adolescents were less likely than urban adolescents to receive each vaccination except in the Northeast, where they were more likely to receive HPV vaccination (incidence rate ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.2005–1.13). Timely HPV vaccination was associated with female sex, urbanicity, Western residence, and later birth cohort. ConclusionsHPV vaccination occurred later than Tdap or MenACWY vaccination and was less frequent in boys and rural adolescents. Girls, Western and urban residents, and younger birth cohorts were more likely to receive timely HPV vaccination. Vaccine coadministration increased over time and may encourage timely and complete vaccination coverage.

Patient reaction to Tdap vaccination in pregnancy

BackgroundThe current obstetrical recommendation is to routinely administer the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during every pregnancy regardless of a patient’s prior history. There are minimal data that have prospectively evaluated solicited patient response to this treatment plan. The study objective was to evaluate patient reaction following receipt of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. MethodsThis was a prospective observational study conducted from May 2014 through March 2016. The study design involved solicited patient reaction within 1–7days after the administration of the Tdap vaccine. Data collected included pain or soreness, swelling, and/or redness at the injection site, as well as, fever and generalized body aches. Statistical analysis involved simple percentages with Poisson binomial 95% confidence intervals with Chi-square and Fisher’s exact comparisons where appropriate. ResultsA total of 737 patients were evaluated and 496 (67%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 64–71%) were found to have at least 1 reaction to the vaccination and 187 (25%, 95% CI 22–29%) had 2 reactions or more. Overall, the majority of patients stated that the vaccination was tolerated. However, 24 (3%, 95% CI 2–5%) of the study population stated that they would not accept receipt of Tdap in a subsequent pregnancy because of the response that occurred in the current pregnancy. ConclusionThese data demonstrate that maternal reactions following receipt of Tdap are common (two-thirds of the study population). A potential concern is the finding that some patients might refuse a repeat vaccination in a subsequent pregnancy due to these reactions. If further research reveals similar findings, a pertussis only vaccine for pregnant patients might need to be evaluated.

Maternal Tdap vaccination: Coverage and acute safety outcomes in the vaccine safety datalink, 2007–2013

IntroductionSince October 2012, the combined tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) has been recommended in the United States during every pregnancy. MethodsIn this observational study from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, we describe receipt of Tdap during pregnancy among insured women with live births across seven health systems. Using a retrospective matched cohort, we evaluated risks for selected medically attended adverse events in pregnant women, occurring within 42 days of vaccination. Using a generalized estimating equation, we calculated adjusted incident rate ratios (AIRR). ResultsOur vaccine coverage cohort included 438,487 live births between January 1, 2007 and November 15, 2013. Across the coverage cohort, 14% received Tdap during pregnancy. By 2013, Tdap was administered during pregnancy in 41.7% of live births, primarily in the 3rd trimester. Our vaccine safety cohort included 53,885 vaccinated and 109,253 matched unvaccinated pregnant women. There was no increased risk for a composite outcome of medically attended acute adverse events within 3 days of vaccination. Similarly, across the safety cohort, over a 42 day window, incident neurologic events, thrombotic events, and new onset proteinuria did not differ by maternal receipt of Tdap. Among women receiving Tdap at 20 weeks gestation or later, as compared to their matched controls, there was no increased risk for gestational diabetes or cardiac events while venous thromboembolic events and thrombocytopenia were diagnosed within 42 days of vaccination at slightly decreased rates. ConclusionTdap coverage during pregnancy increased from 2007 through 2013, but was still below 50%. No acute maternal safety signals were detected in this large cohort.

Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy in a metropolitan tertiary care center

ObjectivesTetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is recommended during each pregnancy, but national uptake is poor. We assessed Tdap uptake in a tertiary referral hospital served by university-affiliated and private obstetrical offices. MethodsReview of women delivering at Texas Children's Hospital Pavilion for Women, Houston, Texas, during April 2013–June 2014. Results6577 deliveries occurred during the study period. Mean maternal age was 29.8 years (range 13–49); race/ethnicity was 43.6% White, 27% Hispanic, 21% Black, 7.1% Asian, and 1.3% other. 252 were multiple gestations; 229 sets of twins, 21 triplets and 2 quadruplets. 3678 (56%) women received Tdap during pregnancy, 249 (3.8%) postpartum and 100 (1.5%) received Tdap pre-conception only. Tdap uptake during pregnancy increased from 36% in April 2013 to a sustained uptake of greater than 61% since November 2013, with increases noted coincidental with presentations highlighting Tdap maternal immunization recommendations at faculty and staff meetings, and the release of the ACOG “toolkit”. When antenatal Tdap vaccine was administered, mean gestation at receipt of Tdap was 31.4 weeks and 95% of vaccinated women received Tdap at the recommended gestation interval of 27–36 weeks, 71.6% during the 28–32 week window believed optimal for placental transport and 98.5% at least 7 days before delivery. Of 19 women with two pregnancies during the study period, four (21%) had Tdap during both. Black women were less likely to receive antenatal Tdap than women of other race/ethnicity (41% versus 60%; P<0.001). ConclusionsSustained antenatal Tdap uptake rates exceeding 61% were achieved after strategies to increase awareness of recommendations were introduced and 95% of women were immunized at a gestation optimal for efficient maternal antibody placental transport. Further increases in uptake will require system changes such as best practice alerts in electronic medical records.

Evaluation of the Association of Maternal Pertussis Vaccination With Obstetric Events and Birth Outcomes

Importance In 2010, due to a pertussis outbreak and neonatal deaths, the California Department of Health recommended that the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) be administered during pregnancy. Tdap is now recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for all pregnant women, preferably between 27 and 36 weeks’ gestation. Limited data exist on Tdap safety during pregnancy. Objective To evaluate whether maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric events or adverse birth outcomes. Design and Setting Retrospective, observational cohort study using administrative health care databases from 2 California Vaccine Safety Datalink sites. Participants and Exposures Of 123 494 women with singleton pregnancies ending in a live birth between January 1, 2010, and November 15, 2012, 26 229 (21%) received Tdap during pregnancy and 97 265 did not. Main Outcomes and Measures Risks of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births ( Results Vaccination was not associated with increased risks of adverse birth outcomes: crude estimates for preterm delivery were 6.3% of vaccinated and 7.8% of unvaccinated women (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.09); 8.4% of vaccinated and 8.3% of unvaccinated had an SGA birth (adjusted RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06). Receipt of Tdap before 20 weeks was not associated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (adjusted RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99-1.20); chorioamnionitis was diagnosed in 6.1% of vaccinated and 5.5% of unvaccinated women (adjusted RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of women with singleton pregnancies that ended in live birth, receipt of Tdap during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or preterm or SGA birth, although a small but statistically significant increased risk of chorioamnionitis diagnosis was observed.

Evaluation of the association of maternal pertussis vaccination with obstetric events and birth outcomes.

In 2010, due to a pertussis outbreak and neonatal deaths, the California Department of Health recommended that the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) be administered during pregnancy. Tdap is now recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for all pregnant women, preferably between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation. Limited data exist on Tdap safety during pregnancy. To evaluate whether maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric events or adverse birth outcomes. Retrospective, observational cohort study using administrative health care databases from 2 California Vaccine Safety Datalink sites. Of 123,494 women with singleton pregnancies ending in a live birth between January 1, 2010, and November 15, 2012, 26,229 (21%) received Tdap during pregnancy and 97,265 did not. Risks of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births (<10th percentile), chorioamnionitis, preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were evaluated. Relative risk (RR) estimates were adjusted for site, receipt of another vaccine during pregnancy, and propensity to receive Tdap during pregnancy. Cox regression was used for preterm delivery, and Poisson regression for other outcomes. Vaccination was not associated with increased risks of adverse birth outcomes: crude estimates for preterm delivery were 6.3% of vaccinated and 7.8% of unvaccinated women (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.09); 8.4% of vaccinated and 8.3% of unvaccinated had an SGA birth (adjusted RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06). Receipt of Tdap before 20 weeks was not associated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (adjusted RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99-1.20); chorioamnionitis was diagnosed in 6.1% of vaccinated and 5.5% of unvaccinated women (adjusted RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26). In this cohort of women with singleton pregnancies that ended in live birth, receipt of Tdap during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or preterm or SGA birth, although a small but statistically significant increased risk of chorioamnionitis diagnosis was observed.

Receipt of pertussis vaccine during pregnancy across 7 Vaccine Safety Datalink Sites

ObjectiveIn response to widespread pertussis outbreaks and infant deaths, in 2010, the California Department of Health (CDPH) and in 2011 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advised that the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine be administered during pregnancy. The goals of this study were to describe Tdap coverage among pregnant women following these recommendations. MethodsIn this observational cohort study, we utilized electronic medical record and claims data from seven Vaccine Safety Datalink sites to identify pregnancies and Tdap administrations. All Tdap doses were classified as pre-pregnancy, during pregnancy or post-pregnancy/postpartum. For pregnancies ending in a live birth, we evaluated factors associated with Tdap vaccination. ResultsAmong 289,141 live births at the California VSD sites, receipt of Tdap during pregnancy increased substantially in the years 2010, 2011, and 2012, when coverage was 15.9, 30.0 and 19.5%, respectively. Among 82,398 women with live births at the Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Wisconsin and Minnesota VSD sites, receipt of Tdap during pregnancy first increased in 2012, at 16.0%. Women receiving early prenatal care and other vaccine(s) during pregnancy had higher Tdap coverage. ConclusionWe observed substantial increases in Tdap coverage during pregnancy following CDPH and ACIP recommendations.

Effectiveness of hospital-based postpartum procedures on pertussis vaccination among postpartum women

Pertussis causes significant morbidity among adults, children, and especially infants. Since 2006, pertussis vaccination has been recommended for women after delivery. We conducted a prospective, controlled evaluation of in-hospital postpartum pertussis vaccination of birth mothers from October 2009 through July 2010 to evaluate the effectiveness of hospital-based procedures in increasing postpartum vaccination. The intervention and comparison hospitals are private community facilities, each with 2000-6000 births/year. At the intervention hospital, physician opt-in orders for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) before discharge were implemented in November 2009, followed by standing orders in February 2010. The comparison hospital maintained standard practice. Randomly selected hospital charts of women after delivery were reviewed for receipt of Tdap and demographic data. We evaluated postpartum Tdap vaccination rates and conducted multivariate analyses to evaluate characteristics that are associated with vaccination. We reviewed 1264 charts (658 intervention hospital; 606 comparison hospital) from women with completed deliveries. Tdap postpartum vaccination was 0% at both hospitals at baseline. In the intervention hospital, the introduction of the opt-in order was followed by an increase in postpartum vaccination to 18%. The introduction of the standing order approach was followed by a further increase to 69% (P < .0001). No postpartum Tdap vaccinations were documented in the comparison hospital. Postpartum Tdap vaccination in the intervention hospital did not differ by demographic characteristics. In-hospital ordering procedures substantially increased Tdap vaccination coverage in women after delivery. Opt-in orders increased coverage that increased substantially with standing orders.

Impact of a physician recommendation and parental immunization attitudes on receipt or intention to receive adolescent vaccines

Four vaccines are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for adolescents. Parental attitudes may play a key role in vaccination uptake in this age group. In 2011, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among parents of adolescents in one county in Georgia to identify parental attitudes toward adolescent vaccination, reasons for vaccine acceptance or refusal, and impact of a physician recommendation for vaccination. Physician recommendation was reported as one of the top reasons for receipt or intent to receive any of the vaccines. Physician recommendation of any of the four vaccines was associated with receipt of Tdap (p < 0.001), MCV4 (p < 0.001), and HPV (p = 0.03) and intent to receive Tdap (p = 0.05), MCV4 (p = 0.005), and HPV (p = 0.05). Compared with parents who did not intend to have their adolescent vaccinated with any of the vaccines, parents who did intend reported higher perceived susceptibility (3.12 vs. 2.63, p = 0.03) and severity of disease (3.89 vs. 3.70, p = 0.02) and higher perceived benefit of vaccination (8.48 vs. 7.74, p = 0.02). These findings suggest that future vaccination efforts geared toward parents may benefit from addressing the advantages of vaccination and enhancing social norms. Physicians can play a key role by providing information on the benefits of adolescent vaccination.

Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination Coverage Among Privately Insured Women of Reproductive Age

An increasing number of vaccines are now designated as maternal vaccines, recommended prior to, during, or immediately following pregnancy. The influenza and pertussis (Tdap) vaccines have the potential to improve the health of women and their offspring. Among privately insured women of reproductive age, goals of this study were to describe influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage and to explore variation in coverage by age and race/ethnicity. This cross-sectional, observational study included women 18-44years of age with continuous enrollment from 1 January 2007-31 March 2011 in a single, Midwestern health insurance plan and at least one visit to a plan affiliated practice. Data on vaccine coverage came from insurance claims, supplemented by electronic medical record data. Primary outcomes were: receipt of Tdap ever, receipt of Tdap or Tetanus vaccination (Td) in the past 10years, and receipt of influenza vaccination during the 2010-2011 influenza season. Coverage was compared by race/ethnicity. Among 12,657 women with continuous private insurance, 45.5% had received Tdap ever, 82.5% had received Td or Tdap in the past 10years, and 39.8% received the influenza vaccine in the 2010-2011 season. Marked disparities in influenza vaccination coverage by race/ethnicity were observed, only 30.0% of African American women received influenza vaccine compared to 40.7% of white, non-Hispanic women (p<.0001). Among insured women of reproductive age, there is a need for interventions to increase Tdap and influenza vaccination uptake. Further research is needed to understand and address disparities in influenza vaccination coverage in this population.

Committee Opinion No. 521

In light of the recent increased incidence of pertussis in the United States, in 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices approved recommendations for the use of the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) for pregnant women. Furthermore, the committee updated Tdap recommendations for special situations during pregnancy and for persons in contact with infants. The revised guidelines, which are based on a review of data on Tdap safety, immunogenicity, and barriers to receipt of Tdap, are designed to facilitate the use of Tdap to reduce the burden of disease and risk of transmission to infants. There is no evidence of adverse fetal effects from the vaccination of pregnant women with an inactivated virus, bacterial vaccine, or toxoid, and these should be administered if indicated. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice supports the revised recommendations on the administration of Tdap during pregnancy.

Use of the Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Dose Diphtheria and Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) in Allogeneic Transplant (alloHCT) Recipients.

The incidence of pertussis in the United States has steadily increased over the last decade particularly in adolescents and adults. In 2005, in an effort to reduce pertussis in these populations, two vaccines containing tetanus, reduced diphtheria and pertussis toxoids (Tdap) were approved. The two Tdap vaccines contained the same amount of tetanus toxoid (TT) but differ in the amount of diphtheria and pertussis toxoid per dose as well as their indicated age range. In 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended that all adolescents and adults receive a single dose of Tdap. Currently, there are limited data on the immunonogenicity of these vaccines in alloHCT patients. Since 2005, 64 alloHCT recipients have received Tdap at our center. The vaccine administered is approved for individuals 11 to 64 yrs of age and contained 2.5 ug of pertussis toxoid (PT), 2.5 Lf diphtheria toxin, and 5 Lf tetanus toxoid (TT) per dose. The median age at HCT was 19 years. The median age (range) at vaccination was 25.2 years (10–64) years. No patient has reported a significant adverse event, including local site reactions or fever >38. Pre and post vaccine titers are currently available in 41 patients transplanted for acute leukemia (n=22), CML (n=4), MDS (n=5), NHL (n=4), Hodgkin's disease (n=1), hemoglobinopathy (n=4), or Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (n=1). Stem cell donors were an HLA matched sibling (n=23) or unrelated donor (n=18). Fifty-nine percent of patients received T-cell-depleted allografts and the remaining 41% received unmodified allografts. Patients were vaccinated at a median of 4.5 years (range: 0.8–14 years) after transplantation. The majority of patients had no detectable pertussis titers prior to immunization. In an effort to provide early protection against pertussis, ten patients received Tdap as their primary tetanus vaccine. The remainder received Tdap as a booster following one (n=4), two (n=3) or 3 (n=24) age appropriate tetanus/diphtheria containing vaccines. Response to TT (seroconversion >0.15 IU/ml or >3 fold increase) was significantly better when Tdap was used as a booster vaccine compared with use as the initial tetanus vaccine (74% vs 20%, p=0.003). Response to TT and diphtheria toxoid was also significantly better in patients who received Tdap following a series of three tetanus/diphtheria containing vaccines, compared with one or two (p=0.03). In contrast, only 7 patients developed a >2 fold increase in antibody titer against PT. Of these 7 responders, 6 were <15 years of age and three received a series of pediatric DTaP following HCT and prior to receipt of Tdap. These data demonstrate that Tdap should not be given as the primary tetanus vaccine post alloHCT, but should be used as a booster vaccine as recommended for the general population. It also shows that responses to reduced dose pertussis in this patient population are poor. This may reflect the limited immunogenicity of this low dose of PT in adolescents and adults whose T and B cells are naïve to pertussis. Strategies to improve pertussis response in this vulnerable population, such as administration of >1 Tdap and/or donor immunization prior to stem cell harvest, should be explored.