Abstract Objectives There is compelling evidence that diet can prevent chronic disease, and with rising health care costs, healthcare organizations are attempting to identify new clinical interventions that can improve the diets of their patients. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to understand what clinical strategies healthcare organizations are using to increase access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact on health outcomes. Methods Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed® (MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2019. Original studies must have included a healthcare organization and had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts). Two reviewers independently verified included studies, study quality, and data extraction. Results A total of 8877 abstracts were screened which yielded 46 manuscripts from 30 studies. There were 6 program models identified including: 1) cash-back rebate programs, 2) prescription voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food boxes/community supported agriculture (CSA) programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6/30 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to study participant selection bias, and incomplete reporting on tools used for data collection, confounders, and dropouts. Generally, studies that measured dietary intake found some improvements after these interventions. Other objective health markers such as blood pressure and body mass index had mixed results. Conclusions Healthcare-based models currently being tested that provide patients with access to F&V are novel and appear to have promise. However, future studies will need to use rigorous study designs, validated data collection tools and more sophisticated data analysis methodologies to better determine the effect of these interventions on health outcomes. Funding Sources This study was funded with internal fund to RW and SV.