Reasonable Grounds Research Articles

Classifying presence or absence of calcifications on mammography using generative contribution mapping.

The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy of generative contribution mapping (GCM), an explainable deep learning model for images, in classifying the presence or absence of calcifications on mammography. The learning dataset consisted of 303 full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images labeled with microcalcifications obtained from the public INbreast database without extremely dense images. FFDM images were divided into calcification and non-calcification patch images using a sliding window method with 25% overlap. The patch images of the mediolateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) views were divided into a training set of 70%, a validation set of 10%, and a testing set of 20%. The classification performance of GCM classifiers was evaluated and compared with that of EfficientNet classifiers. Visualization maps of GCM highlighted regions of interest more clearly than EfficientNet's gradient-weighted class activation maps. The results showed that GCM classifiers yielded an accuracy of 0.92 (CC), 0.91 (MLO), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (CC), 0.94 (MLO). In conclusion, GCM could accurately classify the presence or absence of calcifications on mammograms and explain intuitively reasonable grounds for their classification with visualization maps highlighting regions of interest.

Upaya Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Sistem Perbankan

The Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC) is an independent institution under the President which was established with Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering. Function of INTRAC are as follows: prevention of money laundering, data and information management, supervision of the compliance of the reporting parties and analyze or investigation of financial transactions that there are reasonable grounds to suspect are related to the commission of a money laundering offence or other crimes acts as referred to in Article 2 Section (1). From the duties and authorities mandated by the Money Laundering Law, PPATK has at least 5 functions, namely financial intelligence, regulators, coordinators, mediators and assistance in law enforcement.In addition, the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC) as an independent institution, also carries out an investigative function, namely collecting, storing, analyzing and evaluating information on transactions that are suspected and suspected of being money laundering.The Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC) was established with the authority to implement policies to prevent and eradicate money laundering while establishing an anti-money laundering regime in Indonesia.

수사와 기소 분리론의 비판적 검토

Investigation should not have any meaning on its own, apart from the prosecuting authority’s decision. This is because these judgments can not be properly made unless the legal and normative viewpoints of the prosecuting authority are applied. There is no purpose of investigation itself, and there should not be because there is no reasonable grounds in terms of protecting constitutional rights and human rights that the independence of the investigative authority should be guaranteed. Therefore, if the purpose of the investigation is to evaluate the possibility of proving guilt and to decide whether to initiate a prosecution, and the validity of the decision is ultimately evaluated by the court's decision or judgment through the trial process. the authority and responsibility of the investigation should belong to the prosecuting authority according to the principle of purposiveness and the principle of professionalism. If the organizational structure and authority are set so that the incentives and decision-making of the members in the organization are contradictory to each other in the areas with the same purpose and function, serious disharmony and burden will occur within the system. Whether the legal nature of the investigation of a specific case is judicial or administrative depends on the philosophical and institutional perspectives with which how important and realistically achievable the culture of the relevant legal system regards the fairness of the investigation procedure. The ideal investigative agency for which our Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Act aims should only discover the actual truth and implement judicial justice, while maintaining objectivity and neutrality in criminal procedures. Investigation should not be used to achieve administrative purposes, but are aimed only at finding the truth and the judicial justice. To achieve this, the investigation should not be part of the administration, but should be part of a judicial or quasi-judicial power independent of the administration in our criminal legal system. If real-world prosecutors fail to realize quasi-judicial independence in spite of these legal ideals and institutions for achieving them, a device that can guarantee independence and objectivity of them should be developed in order to properly implement this ideals. The investigative authority should not be monopolized by administrative agencies that are bound by the principles of administrative authority and purposiveness. Most of the existing problems raised with respect to the prosecutor's concentration of power should have been addressed with the standpoint of strengthening the independence and neutrality of the prosecution service and refraining from unnecessary direct investigations, thereby solidifying their identity as a quasi-judicial institution. In addition, it should have been approached by strengthening the objective measures of checks and independent inspection procedure in the decision-making process of the prosecution service regarding investigations and prosecutions. Separating investigation and prosecution and weakening the prosecuting authority's command and control against the investigation agencies should not have been considered in the first place. The system as a whole has made it easier for front-line investigative agencies to abuse their investigative powers with this new approaches. This accumulates burdens on the criminal system that can not be sustainable in the mid- to long-term and could disrupt our criminal justice system which maintains the fundamental characteristics of the continental inquisitorial system so that the prosecution guarantees the completeness of the investigation in an objective and neutral position,

A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN MILITARY ORGANIZATION FROM MASCULINE TO GENDER-NEUTRAL

The article presents the results of an empirical study of gender relations in the Ukrainian armed forces as one of the conflict zones, in which difficulties may arise during service. The study of correlation between the male service members’ psychological well-being and the change of the military organization nature from masculine to gender-neutral can tackle the occupational segregation related to gender inequality and facilitate the creation of a balanced perspective for both genders in order to achieve more comprehensive decisions on gender equality in the armed forces. The study revealed a correlation between the level of cadets’ psychological wellbeing and the process of integrating women into the armed forces of Ukraine. The integration of women into the military contributes to the psychological well-being of those cadets who perceive a female soldier as a bearer of the core values that constitute the essence of military service, and consider a female soldier as an equal member of the military collective. However, for another part of cadets the feminization of the army brings about the preconditions for experiencing negative emotions and, consequently, diminishes cadets’ psychological wellbeing. The reason of men’s negative emotions can be dissonance caused by biased thinking based on gender role stereotypes, but it can also have reasonable grounds. The main reason for the cadets’ lack of psychological well-being is the sense of injustice caused by the privileged position of women in the army in the distribution of duties, functions, responsibilities.

Construction of Socio-situational Identity in Social Media Platforms: A Critical Appraisal of the Use of Digital Write-ups and Photographs

The forms of identity exploration tools and trends have been changed enormously with the rapid expansion of internet media and communication technology for the last decades. Modern dwellers are enthusiastically found to be exposed themselves in online social media through different types of digital contents for establishing their socio-situational identity every day. The random practice of sharing digital contents in online social media is not only a matter of technological instigation, but also a stimulation of late modern socio-situational condition in the process of forming identity for its’ users. Undoubtedly, the digital contents have reasonable grounds to be accepted and celebrated by the social media users in terms of their aptness in purpose. Guided by the spirit of modern technological advancement, the digital contents like digital compositions and photographs seem to occupy a huge amount of social media space today. Although the increasing endorsement and adoration of digital contents in the construction of socio-situational identity in online social platforms is alleged to manufacture a generation having less competence and compassion in the use of language in proper order, many scholars find the initiation however facilitating multidimensional avenues in the narration and construction of socio-situational self for the users. In this circumstance, with the help of recognized works and materials related to the fields, the study intends to investigate, interpret, and review the possible opportunities and challenges in the use of digital write-ups and photographs on the construction of socio-situational identity in online social media platforms.

About Issue 2 of 2022

This issue was undoubtedly the most challenging in my life due to events that I would never have believed could happen in my lifetime or afterward. The heredity of WW2 seemed to me so remarkable and obvious, contemporary human rights values looked so strong and indisputable, that any such open and destructive violations of these rights could hardly be imagined by even the most sceptical people in Europe. Despite many reasonable grounds for this scepticism appearing since 2014, I preferred to believe that these were only politicians’ games and that nobody could ever cross this Rubicon. Yet, during these last months, the whole world has been faced with unprecedented acts against the independent and democratic state in Europe, the ancient nation, and the whole idea of the rule of law. The war in Ukraine has become an event of worldwide relevance: the effects of this war will be borne by future generations of Europeans who are suffering now because of it. Millions of Ukrainians moved to the EU member states and abroad, leaving their homes and property. Many individuals have become victims of war crimes. All this should be the basis for rethinking access to justice as a concept, as well as our system of preventing such a conflict in the future. Even though this war is not the first war in Europe, we must learn lessons from the current events and take the next steps to uphold the rule of law and human rights protection, as was done after WW2. The necessity of an effective conflict resolution system is clear if we are to prevent overcrowded courts and resolve the uncertainties in European society at large.

Legal Regulation of Dismissal in Japan

In Japan dismissals are regulated by the Article 16 of the Labour Contracts Act (LCA) enacted in 2007 which stipulated the established case law rule. It provides that ‘if a dismissal lacks objectively reasonable grounds and is not considered to be appropriate in general societal terms, it is treated as an abuse of rights and is invalid’. Under this doctrine of abusive dismissal, the effect of abusive dismissal is to makes the abusive dismissal invalid and then the courts deliver a declaratory judgment confirming the status of the dismissed worker as the worker of the employer and order of backpay. This remedial rule has a deterrent effect on arbitrary dismissals, and is the most successful aspect of Japanese unfair dismissal law. There is, however, a fatal defect. The Japanese unfair dismissal law does not have effective procedures to resolve dismissal disputes that are prompt, low cost and easy to use. The most necessary thing is to build the effective procedure to resolve dismissal disputes for all the dismissed workers. If this reform is realised, it will provide much more dismissed workers than before with the effective remedies for abusive dismissals and further a deterrent effect of the Article 16 of the LCA on arbitrary dismissals.

From legal proof to scientific proof

Legal proof and scientific proof have similarities and differences. Legal proof is a customary affair, while the nature of scientific proof separates it from general custom, and it is a burdensome and methodological affair. Philosophical issues of scientific proof, including induction and transcendence inherent in any description, can penetrate legal cases and turn into seemingly reasonable grounds for suspicions and abuses. Disregarding the nature of proving scientific laws and the difference between a legal claim and a scientific hypothesis can lead to failure in scientific proof. Disregarding the distinction between natural laws and specific observable events in international cases such as beef hormones and EC- biotech was one of the factors of failure in scientific proof and prolongation of proceedings. In order to have a better approach to scientific evidence, it is necessary not to confuse these concepts in court.

The Constitutional Equilibrium of the Bangladesh Premises Rent Control Act, 1991

The friction between the participants of a lease isn’t a newfangled aspect, such has been in existence over long periods of time. However, recent developing events allude to the exponential enumeration of such kerfuffle. Enactments addressing such issues and providing easement have been in performance since the independence of the Indian subcontinent, which underwent multiple repeal and reenactments pertaining to adapting it to the need of the respective time. Principle of Equity suggests vigilant bus non-dormant bus Jura subventions i.e., to be legally aware and to act promptly furthermore, Bangladesh is a developing nation where multiple sources imply the literacy level to be up to seventy percent (70%), however, legal knowledge is not as widely prevalent as it should be. Not much research has been done on the current topic hence; this study aspires to enlighten the legal rights and limitations of a landlord and a tenant. Through the route of this study, it has been recurringly proven that the concept of rental payment mainly dictates the course of law. A tenant continues to be one so long the rent is cleared and is willing to abide by the regulations of tenancy without fashioning a lump and the landlord without reasonable grounds and bonafide requirements cannot evict a tenant.

Band-Aid on a Bullet Wound—Canada’s Open Work Permit for Vulnerable Workers Policy

In June 2019, the Government of Canada implemented the Open work permit for vulnerable workers (OWP-V) policy, authorizing immigration officers to issue open work permits to migrant workers on employer-specific work permits if they demonstrate reasonable grounds to believe that they are experiencing abuse or are at risk of abuse in their workplace. Drawing on research conducted by a community organization on the impact of the policy, this article examines the policy’s potential to remedy the problematic effects of the employer-specific work permit and whether it has been implemented efficiently. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with organizations that provide direct legal and social support to migrant workers in Canada. Additionally, two datasets regarding the role of the OWP-V policy in IRCC’s employer compliance regime were analyzed. The research concludes that the OWP-V policy cannot be expected to counteract the high risk of abuse imposed on workers through the employer-specific work permit. Numerous barriers were identified that make it difficult for migrant workers to apply for the permit. The small number of OWP-V permits issued in proportion to the number of employers authorized to hire migrant workers makes it unlikely that the policy will significantly impact employers’ propensity to comply with the program conditions.

Next Generation Sequencing of Human Platelet Antigens for Routine Clinical Investigations and Donor Screening.

Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping is performed in a number of clinical scenarios, including characterization of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and provision of HPA-matched platelets. Current gold-standard methods for HPA genotyping utilize single nucleotide variant (SNV) based approaches. This review aims to ascertain if next generation sequencing (NGS) has reasonable grounds to replace SNV-based genotyping for HPA systems. A systematic review was conducted following a comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were subjected to screening based on a defined set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study quality, characteristics and results were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the concordance of HPA genotyping results between NGS and the SNV-based comparators for HPA-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-15. In total, 3374 potentially eligible articles were identified, only 6 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion agreement for the overall concordance of the 6 included studies was shown to be 0.998, 95%CI [0.995, 0.999], P < .001. The discrepancies between HPA genotypes obtained by the two platforms were due to allele dropout in real-time PCR, thus discordant results were in favor of NGS over SNV-based comparators. Currently available platforms for NGS are not without their limitations, including high upfront and ongoing costs, data management and storage, accurate variant calling and availability of appropriately trained staff. Despite the high level of concordance between NGS and current gold-standard methods, these significant challenges mean that NGS is currently not viable as a stand-alone technique for HPA typing.

Satisfaction with permanent changes after cancer surgery: From personal satisfaction of gastric cancer survivors with post-gastrectomy weight loss

This study assessed the personal satisfaction of gastric cancer survivors with post-gastrectomy weight loss. The responses were analyzed in relation to the actual weight status based on two general criteria-preoperative weight and the World Health Organization (WHO) weight classification-as part of an attempt to identify patterns of satisfaction with weight loss. Survivors with significant postoperative weight loss (≥8%) were identified among 1- and 5-year survivors, and were divided into obese/non-obese weight losers (WLs) based on the WHO definition of obesity. For comparison, those with minimal weight change (not exceeding±3%) at each time period were identified (non-WLs).The EORTC QLQ-C30 and -STO22 questionnaires were used to monitor quality of life (QoL). Responses to an item in the EORTC QLQ-STO22, inquiring about personal concerns with weight loss, were used to assess personal satisfaction with weight changes. Except for the QoL disadvantages of non-obese WLs in anxiety (P=0.011) of 1-year survivors and in emotional functioning (P=0.039) of 5-year survivors, there was no significant difference in QoL changes between groups. Regarding personal satisfaction with decreased body weight, non-obese WLs continued to show dissatisfaction (P<0.001) unlike obese WLs, who enjoyed satisfaction comparable to non-WLs long after surgery. Compared with non-obese WLs who expressed dissatisfaction with current weight, obese WLs were satisfied with their current weight several years after surgery. Patient satisfaction with surgical changes may depend on the availability of reasonable grounds that suggest a positive interpretation of surgically altered status.

The Immanent Infinite

The Immanent Infinite

Restrictions on confidential communication between a lawyer and his client under the legislation of foreign countries and the practice of the ECHR

This article reveals the problematic issues related to the implementation of one of the main guarantees of a lawyer's professional activity, namely ensuring the confidentiality of his communication with his client, in particular, regarding the possibility of limiting such confidentiality.&#x0D; The study revealed the positions of foreign legislators, who set certain restrictions on the implementation of the guarantee of a ban on interfering in the private communication of a lawyer with his client. The positions of the European Court of Human Rights, which allow for the possibility of limiting the confidentiality of communication between them, are also analyzed. The position is argued, according to which Ukraine, along with many foreign countries, proceeds from the need to ensure absolute confidentiality of communication between a lawyer and his client.&#x0D; To achieve this goal, the author used methods typical of legal science. The study was conducted using primarily a comparative legal method, which provided an opportunity to analyze the experience of foreign countries in implementing the guarantee of prohibition of interference in private communication with a client, while the formal-dogmatic method allowed to analyze the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.&#x0D; The study allows us to conclude that a significant number of countries enshrining the right of a lawyer and his client to such communication, set certain restrictions on its implementation, in particular: an exception to the confidentiality of correspondence is possible if the judiciary has reasonable grounds to believe that it is criminal ( Italy); if there is a reasonable suspicion that the accused may violate the detention regime (Macedonia); or only in cases involving the establishment of terrorist organizations and criminal organizations abroad (Germany), etc.

Benchmark examples for data-driven site characterisation

ABSTRACT Decision making in geotechnical engineering is always related to a project carried out at a specific site. It is natural for data-driven site characterization (DDSC) to attract the most attention in data-centric geotechnics. This paper proposed eight benchmark examples and a benchmarking procedure to support unbiased and competitive evaluation of emerging ML methods. The primary goal of DDSC is to bring the value of a “data first” agenda to practice, specifically to produce a 3D stratigraphic map of the subsurface volume below a full-scale project site and to estimate relevant engineering properties at each spatial point based on site investigation data and other relevant Big Indirect Data (BID). A reasonable full-scale ground 20 m long × 20 m wide × 10 m deep is adopted. Virtual grounds containing horizontal, inclined, or discontinuous soil layers and spatially varying synthetic cone penetration test data are created to test the performance of DDSC methods over a range of ground conditions. A benchmark example is defined by a combination of a virtual ground (“reality”) and a training dataset (measured “reality”). An additional benchmark example based on actual CPT data is included to check whether performance under virtual ground conditions holds under real ground conditions.

Body examinations of underage children committing crime - A Swedish perspective

The enforcement of a sentence requires that, at the time of the crime, the suspect has reached the age of criminal responsibility according to the Swedish Criminal Code (SFS 1962:700) as well as the Conventions on the Rights of the Child and also implicit in other international agreements. Similarly, until 2017, the Swedish Young Offenders Special Provisions Act (SFS 1964:167) required that for the use of coercive measures, a person who was on reasonable grounds suspected of a crime which might lead to a prison sentence had to have reached the age of criminal responsibility. The requirements for a body examination were extended at the time in the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure (SFS 1942:740) to also include situations where there is an uncertainty concerning the suspect’s age. The extension regarding body examinations was a consequence of the aftermath of the refugee crisis of 2015. Uncertainty concerning the age of a person seeking asylum had led to discussions on what methods to use in order to determine a person’s age. The issue was also raised in criminal cases where the age of a suspect was unclear and concerned, more precisely, the burden of proof regarding the age of a suspect and the legal grounds for a body examination when estimating a suspect’s age. In this article I will with reference to the fundamental principles of proportionality, predictability, equal treatment and consistency scrutinize the legal grounds for a body examination when there is an uncertainty concerning age and the suspect claims to be under the age of criminal responsibility in relation to Article 3 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child that states that ‘the best interests of the child shall be…’ and similarly in Article 24:2 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights ‘the child’s best interests must be a primary consideration’. Furthermore, I will explore what impact the practice of a body examination in those specific situations may have from a gender and diversity perspective. At the extension of the requirement of the legal grounds for a body examination in 2017, the child’s best interests were not taken into consideration. From a gender and diversity perspective, this extension implies the preservation of a prevailing structure that men with a foreign background commit more crimes than men and women born in Sweden.

Категорические моральные требования

This paper defends the doctrine that moral requirements are categorical in nature. My point of departure is John McDowell’s 1978 essay, “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?”, in which McDowell argues, against Philippa Foot, that moral reasons are not conditional upon agents’ desires and are, in a certain sense, inescapable. After expounding McDowell’s view, exploring his idea that moral requirements “silence” other considerations and discussing its particularist ethos, I address an objection that moral reasons, as McDowell conceives them, are fundamentally incomplete in ways only a full-bloodedly Kantian appeal to pure practical reason can remedy. I conclude that the objection fails: ordinary moral reasons do not stand in need of a grounding in Reason. There is no prospect of deriving them from a supreme principle of morality or other canons of rationality. Ordinary reasons are sufficient in themselves, though their significance can be elucidated and illuminated by various strategies — some broadly Aristotelian, some drawing inspiration from Kant’s formula of humanity — in ways that can strengthen and vindicate them. Notwithstanding the failure of the objection, I conclude by reflecting on how Kantian insights can yet play a significant role in a McDowellian view of moral deliberation and moral education.

Challenging the Practice of Administrative Detention for Stateless Persons in South Africa

In South Africa section 41 of the Immigration Act requires any person approached on reasonable grounds by a police or immigration officer to identify themselves either as a citizen or as a person lawfully present in the Republic. Anyone unable to identify themselves as persons lawfully in South Africa will be deemed to be illegally present and hence subject to an arrest, detention, and possible deportation. This detention can go on for an initial period of 120 days. This “unlawful” status automatically entitles immigration officials to arrest and detain such persons, but with the caveat that if such persons express an intention to apply for refugee status their asylum application must be permitted and facilitated. Stateless persons are, by definition, unable to demonstrate their legal presence or provide a valid identity document. They would therefore be deemed to be unlawfully present and therefore detained. This section of the Immigration Act is especially prejudicial to stateless persons since South Africa has no status determination procedure for stateless persons. This paper intends to demonstrate the unlawfulness of the laws regarding the immigration detention of stateless persons and whether there is an alternative approach or a remedy that could be implemented for stateless persons arrested without the means to identify themselves in South Africa.

О правоприменительном усмотрении при оценке судом доказательств по юридическому делу

In this article, a detailed analysis of the term "judicial discretion" has been carried out. From the totality of the positions of legal scholars studied, a narrow conclusion was made that judicial discretion is a subjective right to a limited variability of actions. Regarding the differentiation of the terms "judicial discretion" and "judicial discretion", the conclusion was formulated that the authorized subject of judicial discretion, as well as judicial, will always be a court represented by a judge. Consequently, for the purposes of this article, these concepts were used as synonyms, since, according to the authors, there are no reasonable grounds for their differentiation. Investigating the issue of judicial discretion when assessing evidence by the court in civil cases, an argument was formulated that in law enforcement practice it is traced that the specifics of each civil case are individual and it is impossible to provide all the details of any particular case in the legal norms. It is at this stage that the limited freedom of the court opens up when forming internal attitudes in a particular legal case, and, in particular, for the application of judicial discretion. Studying the problem of judicial discretion in the process of evaluating evidence by the court, it was impossible not to see its connection with the judge's inner conviction. The authors concluded that it is the judge's inner conviction that will play a primary role in the court's assessment of evidence. The article formulated the position that in terms of the court's assessment of evidence, a certain "limit" of judicial discretion is the requirement of procedural codes that the motivational part of the court's decision should indicate the reasons for which the court rejected certain evidence. Thus, applying judicial discretion, the judge is in any case obliged to motivate the adoption of such a decision and justify the choice of this option, in no way going beyond the scope of a specific legal case in his conclusions. According to the results of the study of specific examples from judicial practice, it became clear that the ambiguity in determining the motives for which the court made a particular decision entails an appeal of judicial acts, and, subsequently, their cancellation, which negatively affects statistics and belittles the authority of the judicial system. It follows from this that the gaps in legislative regulation in terms of the categories studied in this article have long been in need of filling. The diversity of the interpretation of concepts leads to a kind of "thinking out" and the lack of unity in the application of these categories in practice. In the absence of achieving legal consolidation of the content of these concepts and their boundaries, there will always be a risk of going beyond their limits, which each specific subject will determine independently.

PROCEDURAL PARTICULARS OF ADOPTING A DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF REMOVAL FROM OFFICE

In the article, the author considered certain procedural aspects of decision-making on the application of suspension from office. The concept of ‘application’ in the context of measures to ensure criminal proceedings is considered. It was established that the term ‘application’ in the context of measures to ensure criminal proceedings, including removal from office, actually implies a complex approach, which includes both the selection of a specific coercive measure and its direct application. The author notes that making a decision on the expediency of applying to a person the very removal from the position of investigator, prosecutor depends to a certain extent on his criminal procedural competence. It is indicated that the analysis of the criminal procedural legislation shows that removal from office can be carried out both at the stage of pre-trial investigation and directly during court proceedings. The existence of procedural differences in the procedure for applying removal from office to a person depending on the stage of criminal proceedings is substantiated, in particular, at the stage of pre-trial investigation, the prosecutor, the investigator, in agreement with the prosecutor, apply for removal from office to the investigating judge, at the stage of court proceedings directly to the court. It is argued that it is inexpedient to submit in the motion for removal from office at the stage of court proceedings information containing a statement of the circumstances that give grounds to suspect a person of committing a criminal offense, since the indictment contains information about the circumstances of the commission of the criminal offense and the involvement of the person in its commission, which are substantiated by arguments, and with which the court familiarizes itself in the preparatory court session. The author emphasizes the importance of the criminal procedural regulation, the possibility for the inquirer, upon agreement with the prosecutor, during the investigation of criminal offenses and in the presence of reasonable grounds, to file a petition for the application of a person's removal from office.