Rearranged During Transfection Inhibitors Research Articles

Discovery and optimization of selective RET inhibitors via scaffold hopping

Aberrant alterations of rearranged during transfection (RET) have been identified as actionable drivers of multiple cancers, including thyroid carcinoma and lung cancer. Currently, several approved multikinase inhibitors such as vandetanib and cabozantinib demonstrate clinical activity in patients with RET-rearranged or RET-mutant cancers. However, the observed response rates are only modest and the ‘off-target’ toxicities resulted from the inhibition of other kinases is also a concern. Herein, we designed and synthesized a series of RET inhibitors based on the structure of selective RET inhibitor BLU-667 and investigated their biological activities. We identified compound 9 as a novel potent and selective RET inhibitor with improved drug-like properties. Compound 9 exhibits a selective inhibitory profile with an inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) of 1.29 nM for RET and 1.97 (RET V804M) or 0.99 (RET M918T) for mutant RETs. The proliferation of Ba/F3 cells transformed with NSCLC related KIF5B-RET fusion was effectively suppressed by compound 9 (IC50 = 19 nM). Additionally, compound 9 displayed less ‘off-target’ effects than BLU-667. In mouse xenograft models, compound 9 repressed tumor growth driven by KIF5B-RET-Ba/F3 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Based on its exceptional kinase selectivity, good potency and high exposure in tumor tissues, compound 9 represents a promising lead for the discovery of RET directed therapeutic agents and the study of RET-driven tumor biology.

BOS172738, a highly potent and selective RET inhibitor, for the treatment of RET-altered tumors including RET-fusion+ NSCLC and RET-mutant MTC: Phase 1 study results.

3008 Background: RET (REarranged during Transfection) gene alterations (mutations and fusions) leading to constitutive kinase activity are identified as drivers of disease progression in multiple tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). BOS172738 is an investigational, potent, selective oral RET kinase inhibitor. This next-generation inhibitor was designed with nanomolar potency against RET and >300-fold selectivity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, to maximize the potential therapeutic window. Methods: NCT03780517 is a phase 1 study consisting of a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase. During the escalation, 67 patients with RET-altered advanced solid tumors received once-daily oral doses of BOS172738 (10-150 mg). Intra-patient dose escalation was allowed as was over-accrual to dose levels deemed to be safe. Study endpoints were safety (CTCAE v. 4.03), tolerability and confirmed overall response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1). The data cutoff was Dec. 11, 2020. Results: BOS172738 exhibited a favorable safety profile (n=67) for long-term administration with most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) classified as grade ≤2 and deemed unrelated to drug. The most common TEAEs were creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) increase (54%), dyspnea (34%), facial edema, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, anemia (25% each), neutropenia, diarrhea (22% each), fatigue (21%), and constipation (20%). BOS172738 was not associated with hypertension or significant hepatoxicity. BOS172738 demonstrated broad anti-tumor activity with an investigator-assessed ORR of 33% (n=18/54), a NSCLC ORR of 33% (n=10/30), MTC ORR of 44% (n=7/16, including 1 complete response) and one patient with RET fusion+ pancreatic cancer reported a partial response. Responders included patients with brain metastases with one patient whose brain lesion decreased by 43%. The median duration of response has not been reached. Many patients remain on study, including the longest of 659 days, at data cutoff. BOS172738 exhibited dose-dependent exposure (AUC, Cmax), rapid absorption (median Tmax 1 to 4.5 h), and an extended half-life (approximately 65 hours) maximizing target coverage. Conclusions: BOS172738 is a highly potent and selective RET inhibitor with a differentiated safety profile and clinical activity against RET-altered tumors, including patients with brain metastases. BOS172738 continues to be evaluated in patients with NSCLC, MTC, and in patients previously treated with other selective RET inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT03780517.

Novel Human-Derived RET Fusion NSCLC Cell Lines Have Heterogeneous Responses to RET Inhibitors and Differential Regulation of Downstream Signaling.

Rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements occur in 1% to 2% of lung adenocarcinomas as well as other malignancies and are now established targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We developed three novel RET fusion-positive (RET+) patient-derived cancer cell lines, CUTO22 [kinesin 5B (KIF5B)-RET fusion], CUTO32 (KIF5B-RET fusion), and CUTO42 (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-RET fusion), to study RET signaling and response to therapy. We confirmed each of our cell lines expresses the RET fusion protein and assessed their sensitivity to RET inhibitors. We found that the CUTO22 and CUTO42 cell lines were sensitive to multiple RET inhibitors, whereas the CUTO32 cell line was >10-fold more resistant to three RET inhibitors. We discovered that our RET+ cell lines had differential regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (AKT) pathways. After inhibition of RET, the CUTO42 cells had robust inhibition of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT), whereas CUTO22 and CUTO32 cells had sustained AKT activation. Next, we performed a drug screen, which revealed that the CUTO32 cells were sensitive (<1 nM IC50) to inhibition of two cell cycle-regulating proteins, polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora kinase A. Finally, we show that two of these cell lines, CUTO32 and CUTO42, successfully establish xenografted tumors in nude mice. We demonstrated that the RET inhibitor BLU-667 was effective at inhibiting tumor growth in CUTO42 tumors but had a much less profound effect in CUTO32 tumors, consistent with our in vitro experiments. These data highlight the utility of new RET+ models to elucidate differences in response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and downstream signaling regulation. Our RET+ cell lines effectively recapitulate the interpatient heterogeneity observed in response to RET inhibitors and reveal opportunities for alternative or combination therapies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We have derived and characterized three novel rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion non-small cell lung cancer cell lines and demonstrated that they have differential responses to RET inhibition as well as regulation of downstream signaling, an area that has previously been limited by a lack of diverse cell line modes with endogenous RET fusions. These data offer important insight into regulation of response to RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other potential therapeutic targets.

Characterization of LDD-2633 as a Novel RET Kinase Inhibitor with Anti-Tumor Effects in Thyroid Cancer.

Rearranged during transfection (RET), a receptor tyrosine kinase, is activated by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands. Chromosomal rearrangement or point mutations in RET are observed in patients with papillary thyroid and medullary thyroid carcinomas. Oncogenic alteration of RET results in constitutive activation of RET activity. Therefore, inhibiting RET activity has become a target in thyroid cancer therapy. Here, the anti-tumor activity of a novel RET inhibitor was characterized in medullary thyroid carcinoma cells. The indirubin derivative LDD-2633 was tested for RET kinase inhibitory activity. In vitro, LDD-2633 showed potent inhibition of RET kinase activity, with an IC50 of 4.42 nM. The growth of TT thyroid carcinoma cells harboring an RET mutation was suppressed by LDD-2633 treatment via the proliferation suppression and the induction of apoptosis. The effects of LDD-2633 on the RET signaling pathway were examined; LDD-2633 inhibited the phosphorylation of the RET protein and the downstream molecules Shc and ERK1/2. Oral administration of 20 or 40 mg/kg of LDD-2633 induced dose-dependent suppression of TT cell xenograft tumor growth. The in vivo and in vitro experimental results supported the potential use of LDD-2633 as an anticancer drug for thyroid cancers.

Selpercatinib for lung and thyroid cancers with RET gene mutations or fusions.

Aberrations in oncogene RET (rearranged during transfection) have been found to be the cause of different kinds of malignancies, especially in lung and thyroid cancers. Targeted therapy of RET-altered cancers using multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) has demonstrated limited clinical efficacy due to off-target toxicity. In May 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a novel specific RET inhibitor for use in some subtypes of lung and thyroid cancers with RET alterations. In this review, we summarize the mechanism of action, pharmaceutical properties and clinical data of selpercatinib, and share some of our perspectives.

Pralsetinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

The identification of oncogenic drivers and the subsequent development of targeted therapies have been established as biomarker-based care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Rearranged during transfection (RET) events have been reported to be oncogenic drivers in NSCLC and were more common in patients who i) were young; ii) had adenocarcinoma histology; and iii) had never smoked. Phase II studies indicated the limited efficacy of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with NSCLC that have a confirmed RET event. Consequently, there has been ongoing research to develop more potent and specific RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recently, a novel and specific RET inhibitor, pralsetinib (BLU-667), has been reported to have excellent efficacy and low off-target toxicity in RET cancer patients. In this review, we summarize the clinical data regarding the use of pralsetinib in NSCLC patients.

Mechanisms of resistance to selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions are a validated target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RET-selective inhibitors selpercatinib (LOXO-292) and pralsetinib (BLU-667) recently demonstrated favorable antitumor activity and safety profiles in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and both have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Insights into mechanisms of resistance to selective RET inhibitors remain limited. This study was performed at five institutions. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA was obtained from patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC after treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib and assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or MET FISH. We analyzed a total of 23 post-treatment tissue and/or plasma biopsies from 18 RET fusion-positive patients who received an RET-selective inhibitor (selpercatinib, n= 10; pralsetinib, n= 7; pralsetinib followed by selpercatinib, n= 1, with biopsy after each inhibitor). Three cases had paired tissue and plasma samples, of which one also had two serial resistant tissue specimens. The median progression-free survival on RET inhibitors was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval 3.6-10.8 months]. Acquired RET mutations were identified in two cases (10%), both affecting the RET G810 residue in the kinase solvent front. Three resistant cases (15%) harbored acquired MET amplification without concurrent RET resistance mutations, and one specimen had acquired KRAS amplification. No other canonical driver alterations were identified by NGS. Among 16 resistant tumor specimens, none had evidence of squamous or small-cell histologic transformation. RET solvent front mutations are a recurrent mechanism of RET inhibitor resistance, although they occurred at a relatively low frequency. The majority of resistance to selective RET inhibition may be driven by RET-independent resistance such as acquired MET or KRAS amplification. Next-generation RET inhibitors with potency against RET resistance mutations and combination strategies are needed to effectively overcome resistance in these patients.

Discovery of 4-methyl-N-(4-((4-methylpiperazin- 1-yl)methyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((6-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-oxy)benzamide as a potent inhibitor of RET and its gatekeeper mutant.

The receptor tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) plays pivotal roles in several cancers, including thyroid carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, there are several FDA-approved RET inhibitors, but their indication is limited to thyroid cancer, and none can overcome their gatekeeper mutants (V804L and V804M). Here, we report the discovery of 9x representing a new chemotype of potent and selective RET inhibitors, using a rational design strategy of type II kinase inhibitors. 9x exhibited both superior antiproliferative activities against NSCLC-related carcinogenic fusions KIF5B-RET and CCDC6-RET and gatekeeper mutant-transformed Ba/F3 cells, with the lowest GI50 of 9nM, and substantial inhibitory activities against wild-type RET and RET mutant proteins, with the best IC50 of 4nM. More importantly, 9x also showed nanomole potency against RET-positive NSCLC cells LC-2/ad, but not against a panel of RET-negative cancer cells, such as A549, H3122, A375 or parental Ba/F3 cells, demonstrating its selective 'on-target' effect. In mouse xenograft models, 9x repressed tumor growth driven by both wild type KIF5B-RET-Ba/F3 and gatekeeper mutant KIF5B-RET(V804M)-Ba/F3 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Together, these data establish that 9x provides a good starting point for the development of targeted therapeutics against RET-positive cancers, especially NSCLC.

Acute stress disrupts intestinal homeostasis via GDNF-RET.

ObjectivesEnterochromaffin (EC) cells have been associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders such as IBS. Recently, we found that glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)‐rearranged during transfection (RET) localized in EC cells in human colonic epithelia. Here, we examine the role of GDNF‐RET in the pathophysiology of diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS‐D).Materials and MethodsGDNF was assessed by ELISA and immunohistochemistry in biopsies from IBS‐D patients and healthy controls. Stress was induced by using a wrap‐restraint stress (WRS) procedure to serve as an acute stress‐induced IBS model. The function of GDNF‐RET axis to intestinal stem cell (ISC) homeostasis, and EC cell numbers were assessed in vivo and in vitro.ResultsGDNF‐RET was expressed in EC cells in human colon. GDNF was significantly increased in IBS‐D patients. WRS mice showed increased GDNF‐RET levels in colon. WRS induced visceral hypersensitivity by expanding of ISC and differentiation of EC cell via GDNF‐RET. Furthermore, GDNF‐treated mice recapitulated the phenotype of WRS mice. In vitro, GDNF treatment amplified Wnt signal and increased serotonin levels in colonic organoids in a dose‐dependent manner.ConclusionsWe identified GDNF‐RET was presented in colonic epithelium of patients with IBS‐D. GDNF‐RET played important roles in regulating ISC and EC cell differentiation. Our findings, thus, provide RET inhibitor as new therapeutic targets for treatment of patients with IBS‐D.

Abstract 5402: Inhibition of RET via BLU-667 in an in vitro model of neuroblastoma

Abstract Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Despite aggressive treatment, outcomes in patients with high-risk disease remains poor and new therapeutics are needed to address their needs. Rearranged during Transfection (RET) is a tyrosine kinase that is a known oncogenic driver of multiple human tumors. RET is expressed on neural crest derived cells, including neuroblastoma cells, and has been shown to play a role in neuroblastoma proliferation and survival as well. Recent studies have shown RET inhibition to be a promising new therapeutic target in neuroblastoma. BLU-667 is a selective RET inhibitor with a higher potency and specificity for RET than the current inhibitors that have been previously tested. We hypothesize that this increased potency and specificity will result in greater efficacy against neuroblastoma in preclinical models with fewer off target effects. Thus, to investigate this we evaluated BLU-667 at different concentrations against a panel of established human neuroblastoma cell lines to assess its effects on neuroblastoma cell proliferation, differentiation, and viability. We found that inhibition of RET resulted in a significant decrease in cell proliferation and viability in vitro. Further, given the increased specificity of BLU-667 to RET, we hope to use western blot protein analysis to establish the specific downstream pathways through which RET inhibition leads to decreased neuroblastoma cell survival, potentially revealing further therapeutic targets. Citation Format: Jessica Gutierrez, Sean Flynn, Yuchen Huo, Jacqueline Lesperance, Peter Zage. Inhibition of RET via BLU-667 in an in vitro model of neuroblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5402.

Selpercatinib: First Approval.

Selpercatinib (RETEVMO™) is a receptor tyrosine kinase RET (rearranged during transfection) inhibitor being developed by Loxo Oncology for the treatment of cancers harbouring RET alterations. Based on results from the phase I/II LIBRETTO-001 trial, selpercatinib was recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer and RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of selpercatinib leading to this first approval.

RET Rearrangement as a Predictor of Unresponsiveness to Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Report of Two Cases with Review of the Literature.

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) generally respond poorly to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) given with or without anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) drugs. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC harboring minor drivers, such as fusions in the rearranged during transfection (RET) gene, is still unclear. Here we describe two patients with RET-positive advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who developed progressive disease during first-line treatment with the anti-PD-1 agent pembrolizumab. In particular, while patient 2 was immediately switched to treatment with a selective RET inhibitor within the setting of a clinical trial, patient 1 responded to cytotoxic chemotherapy delivered at the time of progression while on pembrolizumab. These cases of NSCLC are discussed in the context of current literature, which seems to support our observation that patients with RET-positive NSCLC are unlikely to benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, we suggest that for RET-positive patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, consideration should be given to upfront treatment approaches other than single-agent immunotherapy, namely selective RET inhibitors (if available) or regimens including cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Quantitative bioanalytical assay for the selective RET inhibitors selpercatinib and pralsetinib in mouse plasma and tissue homogenates using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the rearranged during transfection (RET) receptor in various types of cancer. In this study, a bioanalytical assay was developed and fully validated for selpercatinib and pralsetinib in mouse plasma and partially in eight mouse tissue homogenates using liquid chromatograph-tandem mass spectrometry. Samples were pre-treated by protein precipitation with acetonitrile using erlotinib as internal standard. Separation of the analytes was performed on an ethylene bridged octadecyl silica C18 column by gradient elution using ammonium hydroxide (in water) and methanol. Analytes were detected by positive electrospray ionization in selected reaction monitoring mode. A linear concentration range of 2–2000 ng/ml was used for the validation of the assay for both inhibitors. The precision values (within–day and between–day) ranged between 3.4 and 10.2% for selpercatinib and 3.1–14.6% for pralsetinib in all matrices. Furthermore, data obtained for accuracy were between 91.7 and 109.3% and 85.1–114.1% for selpercatinib and pralsetinib, respectively. No significant matrix effects or extraction losses were observed and both analytes were stable under all investigated conditions. Finally, a pilot study for selpercatinib in mice was conducted employing this method, followed by a successful incurred sample reanalysis.

RET isoform-specific interaction with scaffold protein Ezrin promotes cell migration and chemotaxis in lung adenocarcinoma

ObjectivesIncreased expression of REarranged during Transfection (RET) kinase is reported in 10–20 % of lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and is associated with metastasis and reduced survival. Ezrin is a scaffold protein that promotes protein interactions with the actin cytoskeleton to regulate cell migration and is also associated with invasion and metastasis in cancers. RET isoforms interact with unique combinations of scaffold proteins to promote distinct signaling pathways. We hypothesized that RET isoforms associate distinctly with Ezrin for cytoskeletal reorganization and LUAD cell migration processes. MethodsHCC1833 and A549 LUAD, SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma or HEK-293 cells expressing RET and Ezrin were stimulated with the RET ligand glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and treated with RET, Ezrin or Src inhibitors. Co-immunoprecipitation or pull-down assays coupled to immunoblotting were used to investigate protein activation and interactions. Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy assessed LUAD cytoskeletal reorganization and colocalization of RET and Ezrin. Live-cell fluorescence imaging was used to measure cell migration and chemotaxis. ResultsGDNF promoted activation, interaction and colocalization of RET51 isoform and Ezrin. Inhibition of RET or Src impaired Ezrin interactions with RET and Src. GDNF stimulation enhanced the formation of actin-rich filopodia, in which both RET and Ezrin were enriched, and promoted chemotaxis in LUAD cells. However, inhibition of RET, Src or Ezrin suppressed filopodia formation, reduced colocalization of Ezrin with RET, and impaired cell migration and/ or chemotaxis. We further showed that GDNF-mediated activation of RET and Ezrin promoted RhoA-GTPase activity and signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 in LUAD cells. ConclusionsExpression and activation of RET51 mediates unique protein interactions with Ezrin to promote LUAD cell chemotaxis for cancer cell dissemination, which may have implications in LUAD metastatic progression.

RET kinase alterations in targeted cancer therapy.

The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene encodes a protein tyrosine kinase. RET alterations by point mutations and gene fusions were found in diverse cancers. RET fusions allow abnormal expression and activation of the oncogenic kinase, whereas only a few of RET point mutations found in human cancers are known oncogenic drivers. Earlier studies of RET-targeted therapy utilized multi-targeted protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with RET inhibitor activity. These multi-targeted TKIs often led to high-grade adverse events and were subject to resistance caused by the gatekeeper mutations. Recently, two potent and selective RET TKIs, pralsetinib (BLU-667) and selpercatinib (LOXO-292), were developed. High response rates to these selective RET inhibitors across multiple forms of RET alterations in different types of cancers were observed in clinical trials, demonstrating the RET dependence in human cancers harboring these RET lesions. Pralsetinib and selpercatinib were effective in inhibiting RETV804L/M gatekeeper mutants. However, adaptive mutations that cause resistance to pralsetinib or selpercatinib at the solvent front RETG810 residue have been found, pointing to the need for the development of the next-generation of RET TKIs.

Responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in RET-aberrant malignancies

PurposeThe receptor tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) can be oncogenically activated by gene fusions or point mutations. Multikinase inhibitors such as cabozantinib, lenvatinib and vandetanib have demonstrated activity in RET-dependent malignancies, and selective RET inhibitors (Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib) are in clinical trials. However, the responsiveness of RET-dependent malignancies to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. We compared the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICI versus non-ICI therapy in patients with malignancies harbouring activating RET mutations or fusions (RET+).MethodsA retrospective review of all RET+ patients who were referred to the phase I clinical trials programme at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was conducted. TTD was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify independent risk factors of treatment discontinuation.ResultsOf 70 patients who received systemic therapy for RET+ malignancies, 20 (28.6%) received ICI and 50 (71.4%) received non-ICI therapy. Non-ICI therapy was associated with decreased risk for treatment discontinuation compared with ICI in the overall population (HR=0.31; 95% CI 0.16–0.62; p=0.000834) and in patients with RET point mutations (HR=0.13; 95% CI 0.04–0.45; p=0.00134). In patients with RET fusions, non-ICI therapy was associated with a non-statistically significant decreased risk of treatment discontinuation (HR=0.59; 95% CI 0.25–1.4; p=0.24). ICI therapy and a diagnosis other than medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation.ConclusionOur study supports the prioritisation of non-ICI over ICI therapy in patients with RET+ tumours.

363O - Treatment with pralsetinib (formerly BLU-667), a potent and selective RET inhibitor, provides rapid clearance of ctDNA in patients with RET-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)

363O - Treatment with pralsetinib (formerly BLU-667), a potent and selective RET inhibitor, provides rapid clearance of ctDNA in patients with RET-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)

1966P - Treatment with BLU-667, a potent and selective RET inhibitor, provides rapid clearance of ctDNA in patients with RET-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and thyroid cancer

Abstract Background BLU667, an investigational agent, is a potent and selective inhibitor of oncogenic rearranged during transfection (RET) alterations and predicted resistance mutations. Up to 90% of advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is characterized by single nucleotide variants and short insertions/deletions in the RET gene. In NSCLC, 1-2% of patients (pts) harbor rearrangements resulting in RET fusions. In the first-in-human ARROW study (NCT03037385), BLU-667 has demonstrated significant clinical activity in RET-altered NSCLC and MTC and has been well tolerated. Previous data has shown that early declines in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may predict for treatment outcome. We investigated the change in ctDNA levels from baseline following treatment with BLU-667 and whether early changes in ctDNA during treatment were associated with clinical responses and outcomes. Methods Blood was collected at baseline and prespecified time points during treatment. Plasma from 111 pts with locally documented RET-altered MTC and NSCLC were profiled with the Personal Genome Diagnostics PlasmaSELECT™ R64 sequencing panel. Results RET fusions were detected at baseline in 45/63 (71%) pts with NSCLC and RET mutations in 35/48 (73%) pts with MTC. Baseline ctDNA mutant allele fraction (MAF; MTC) or unique fusion reads (NSCLC) correlated with the sum of target lesions (p Conclusions Treatment with BLU-667 led to a robust and rapid decline in ctDNA in almost all patients regardless of treatment dose or tumor diagnosis and in NSCLC irrespective of fusion partner studied. Clinical trial identification NCT03037385. Legal entity responsible for the study Blueprint Medicines Corporation. Funding Blueprint Medicines Corporation. Disclosure G. Curigliano: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Seattle Genetics; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. V. Subbiah: Advisory / Consultancy: MedImmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), NanoCarrier (Inst), Northwest Biotherapeutics (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Roche (Inst), Berg Pharma (Inst), Bayer AG (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Fujifilm (Inst), PharmaMar (Inst), D3 Oncology Solutions (Inst), Pfizer (Ins; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PharmaMar, Bayer AG. J.F. Gainor: Honoraria (self): Merck, Incyte, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Theravance, Loxo, Takeda, Array BioPharma, Amgen, Merck, Agios, Regeneron, Oncorus, Jounce Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Adaptimmune (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), ARIAD Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Jounce Therapeutics (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Moderna Therapeutics (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Alexo T. D.H. Lee: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CJ Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Roche, Samyang Biopharm and ST Cube; Advisory / Consultancy: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Korea, National Evidence-based Collaborating Agency, Korea, and National Cancer Control Planning Board, Korea. M.H. Taylor: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, Eisai Inc, Array Biopharma, Bayer, LOXO, Blueprint, Arqule, Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS, Eisai Inc; Research grant / Funding (institution): BioAtla; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS, Eisai Inc, Array Biopharma, Bayer, Loxo, Blueprint. V. Zhu: Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Roche-Foundation Medicine, Roche/Genentech, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TP Therapeutics. R.C. Doebele: Honoraria (self): Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Guardant Health, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Trovagene; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer, OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Trovagene, Ignyta, GreenPeptide, AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ignyta (Inst); Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ignyta, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Guardant Health; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Rain Therapeutics; Licensing / Royalties: Other Intellectual Property: Licensing fees from Abbott Molecular for patent PCT/US2013/057495, licensing fees from Ignyta for biologic materials (Inst). G. Lopes: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst); EMD Serono (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Bavarian Nordic (Inst), Novartis (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst). E. Garralda: Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS, Menarini, Glycotope; Licensing / Royalties: MSD. S.M. Gadgeel: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer, Genentech, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer (Inst), Merck, Genentech (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), ARIAD Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Takeda (Inst); Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Takeda. C.D. Turner: Full / Part-time employment: Blueprint Medicines Corporation. M. Palmer: Full / Part-time employment: Blueprint Medicines Corporation. S. Miller: Full / Part-time employment: Blueprint Medicines Corporation. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Abstract 2209: Novel therapeutic agents for RET-driven cancers, which is highly potent and selective inhibitor to RET kinase

Abstract The rearranged during transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase is mostly altered by fusion and it makes RET as a attractive therapeutic target for medullary thyroid cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multi-kinase inhibitors (mKIs) such as cabozantinib and vandetanib expressed poor tolerability and limited efficacy due to off-target kinase inhibitory activity in academia and clinical cases. As for selective RET inhibitor, compounds such as BLU-667 and LOXO-292 are under development, currently in clinical trials. We are currently developing potent and selective RET inhibitors to address unmet medical needs for RET-driven cancers. Our team has validated its high potency and selectivity via kinase profiling and in-vitro assay results. We also anticipate our compound to overcome certain mutation, such as V804M. Our compounds strongly suppress phosphorylation of RET in tumor cells with various RET fusions and mutations by inhibiting proliferation at below 10 nM. This potency result is higher than those of other mKIs with RET inhibitory activity. The inhibitory concentration of our compounds to VEGFR2 is more than dozens of fold compared with RET. In addition, our compounds reveal low cytotoxicity in Ba/F3 naïve cells in the 1 µM concentration. These findings lead us to conclude that our compounds can be potent and highly selective inhibitors of RET kinase, a potential novel therapeutic agents for RET-driven cancers. Citation Format: Hua Li, SeoHyun Jo, Woomi Do, Hyunkyung Kim, Hwan Kim, Kyung-ah Seo, Ji-hoon Oh, Jieun Choi, Jaeyoung Ahn, Jung Beom Son, Nam Doo Kim. Novel therapeutic agents for RET-driven cancers, which is highly potent and selective inhibitor to RET kinase [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2209.

The landscape of RET alterations from 56,970 adult patients with cancer: Clinical implications.

3106 Background: Activating receptor-tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection ( RET) mutations and fusions have been recognized as potent drivers of oncogenesis. Recent identification of highly potent and selective RET inhibitors holds great promise in the management of RET-dependent tumors. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of RET alterations in pan-cancer adult malignancies. Methods: We analyzed 59,347 samples from 56,970 patients available from AACR Project GENIE (Cancer Discov. 2017) database for the prevalence of RET fusions, mutations, and copy number alterations in diverse cancer types. Results: A total of 1414 RET alterations were detected, including 91 fusions (6.4%), 1166 missense mutations (82.5%), 136 truncating mutations (9.6%), and 21 in-frame mutations (1.5%). RET fusions were observed in 0.15% of tumor samples and were most commonly identified in non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer (62.6%, 18.6%, 5.5%, 4.4%, 3.3% of identified RET fusions, respectively). RET fusions were significantly co-altered with MAPK3/ERK1 (p=0.045), SETD2 (p=1.36E-07 ), and EIF4E (p=0.045), while there was a negative association between RET fusions and EGFR (p=0.009634) , TP53 (p=0.02267), and KRAS (p=2.53E-05) alterations. Most common RET gene upstream partners were KIF5B, CCDC6, and NCOA4 (42.9%, 24.2%, 7.7% of identified RET fusions, respectively). RET missense mutations were found in 2.0% of tumor samples; 136 (11.7%) of identified missense mutations, including 8 RET gatekeeper V804M/L mutations, were characterized as likely oncogenic, 12 (1.0%) as likely benign, and 1018 (87.3%) as variants of unknown significance using OncoKB database. RET amplifications occurred in 1.5% of tested samples. Conclusions: While RET fusions represent extremely rare events in multiple cancers, RET missense mutations occur in 2% of malignancies. Most RET missense variants are described as variants of unknown significance, limiting the impact of precision oncology for the majority of patients with RET alterations. Further functional characterization of RET variants is warranted. MAPK pathway co-alterations in patents with RET fusions may present a strategy for future therapeutic combinations.