The 1L or 2L standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with aNSCLC and no targetable genetic alterations [TA] is immunotherapy (IO) with anti-PD-1/L1 agents (PD1/L1) and/or platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). In pts with aNSCLC and EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations, SOC is ≥1 line of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The current study aimed to describe RW treatment among pts with PD1/L1 as 1L therapy. This retrospective, observational, two-site cohort study included aNSCLC pts ≥18 years in age who initiated 1L systemic treatment for aNSCLC from 2017 to 2020 from electronic medical records at Leeds Cancer Centre (LCC) in the UK and Frankfurt University Hospital (FUH) in Germany. Pts were analyzed separately at each site with a common protocol and grouped into predefined cohorts: C1 had no TA and 1L PD1/L1; C2 had no TA, 1L+ PD1/L1, and progression; C3 had no TA, 1L+ PD1/L1 ± CT, and progression; C4 had TA, 1L+ TKI(s), and progression; C5 had TA, 1L+ TKI(s) + PD1/L1 + CT, and progression. Only C1 met the evaluable outcome criterion of ≥30 pts per site. The C1 index date was initiation of 1L therapy. At LCC and FUH, C1 included 103 and 104 pts, respectively. C1 was derived from an overall population of 324 (266 with no TA) and 264 (225 with no TA) at LCC and FUH, respectively. C2 to C5 had, as expected, small (unreportable) pt numbers. Most pts in C1 had Stage IV aNSCLC at initial diagnosis and ECOG PS 0 or 1 at start of 1L therapy. In C1 at LCC and FUH, the median (95% CI) RW overall survival (OS) was 15.6 (13.4, 23.3) and 22.2 (16.2, NA) months; RW progression-free survival was 9.0 (6.4, 11.07) and 7.7 (5.4, 12.1) months; at 24 months, the estimated RW OS rate (95% CI) was 36% (27%, 48%) and 48% (37%, 62%).Table: 44PC1 pt characteristics and treatment patternsLCC n = 103FUH n = 104Age, mean, yr66.063.8Male, %54.461.5Stage, %--III21.413.5--IV73.880.8Pathology, %--Squamous17.521.2--Nonsquamous70.971.2ECOG PS, %--016.520.2--162.154.8--2+21.4*21.2**PD-L1 positive, %73.878.8Metastases, %--Brain14.629.8--Visceral54.458.7--Nonvisceral29.146.21L PD1/L1 monotherapy, %53.442.3--TI: 2017–18†§65.8--TI: 2019–20†29.728.81L PD1/L1 + CT ± other anti-cancer, %45.657.7--TI: 2017–18†§34.2--TI: 2019–20†70.371.2§ masked (n <6 for 1L PD1/L1 + CT ± other anti-cancer)* PS 2, 15.5%; PS 3, §; PS 4, §.** PS 2, 16.3%; PS 3, §; PS 4, §.† % in TI periodTI, treatment initiation Open table in a new tab § masked (n <6 for 1L PD1/L1 + CT ± other anti-cancer) * PS 2, 15.5%; PS 3, §; PS 4, §. ** PS 2, 16.3%; PS 3, §; PS 4, §. † % in TI period TI, treatment initiation In this RW study, a larger proportion of pts who initiated 1L treatment in 2019–2020 received PD1/L1 + CT ± other anti-cancer therapy than PD1/L1 monotherapy. Outcomes over time were poor, indicating unmet need.
Read full abstract