Real-time Real-time Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction Assay Research Articles

Comparative study between gold standard real-time RT-PCR assay and rapid antigen test for detection of COVID-19 in Sylhet CMH

Background: The notorious pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spread all over the world. Its third pandemic wave has been completed and now a fourth wave is running over many countries. Almost 60 million people have been infected and more than 5.7 million people have died. Till now almost 1.2 million people have been infected and about 30000 people have died in Bangladesh from Covid-19. It has not only taken away human lives but also has put a tremendous impact on our society and economy. So early detection of this virus and isolating the patients have a significant role to control the disease. Henceforth there is an urgent need for simple, accurate and rapid identifications of C0VID -19. Rapid antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary setting. So, Performance of the Rapid antigen detection test (RAT) should be evaluated and compared with gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: Specimens were collected from both naso and oropharyngeal region from 1000 patients who reported to the flu centre in CMH Sylhet with the complaints of fever, cough & headache for detection of COVID virus-2 RNA by rapid antigen (RAT) and RT-PCR test. We used real time RT-PCR kit (Sansure, Biotech china, gene RdRP & N) and COVID-19 Ag Kit (Wondfo, Republic of China) for detection of COVID-19 RNA. Results: Out of 1000 samples 158 were positive and 842 were negative by real-time RT-PCR assay where 154 samples were positive, and 846 cases were negative by rapid antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV-2. The duration from the onset of symptoms to laboratory test in all suspected cases ranged from 0 to 02 days (with a median of 01 days). The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection tests sensitivity and specificity were 97.29% (95% CI, 90.06–99.89%) and 97.94% (95% CI, 97.26–98.57%), respectively. Seven samples were found negative in RAT but were found positive in RT-PCR, other three samples were found positive in RAT while they were found negative in RT-PCR. Conclusions: It is observed that most rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 are significantly comparable with RT-PCR tests and had enough sensitivity and specificity for 158 individuals, infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2.

Performance evaluation of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo, a novel qualitative and quantitative assay, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Viral load quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a critical measure for monitoring clinical responses of patients with COVID-19. The cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) uses the cobas 6800/8800 platform and is an automated real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (ORF1a and ORF1a/b non-structural regions) in nasal and nasopharyngeal specimens. This assay also performs quantitation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA level in the collected specimen. The precision, accuracy, and linearity of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo test were assessed and correlated with the cycle threshold (Ct) value of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay, and the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B assay (Inf A/B) (cobas Liat) in 201 clinical nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The analytical measurement range of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo has been verified to be 1.0E + 02 IU/mL to 1.0E + 09 IU/mL. The between- and within-run precision evaluation and the linearity results (R 2 = 0.9961) of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo were acceptable based on the verification criteria. A total of 201 nasopharyngeal specimens were evaluated. The positive, negative, and total agreements between the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay were 93.5% (157 of 168), 75% (33 of 44), and 92.5% (186 of 201), respectively. The qualitative results (Ct values) from the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and the cobas Liat demonstrated good agreement with the quantitative results from the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo assay. In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo assay is appropriate. It is a precise, accurate, and sensitive method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and is comparable to two qualitative assays. IMPORTANCE Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 tests for viral load are necessary to guide patient treatment, as well as to determine infection control measures and policies. Although the real-time RT-PCR assays can report the Ct value to estimate the viral load, there are several serious concerns regarding the use of Ct values. Importantly, Ct values can vary significantly among between- and within-run methods. The diagnostic performance of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo is appropriate. It is a precise, accurate, and sensitive method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and is comparable to two qualitative assays (the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and the Liat cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Inf A/B). In contrast, using the Ct value to estimate viral load is not reliable, and utilization of a quantitative detection test, such as the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Duo, to accurately measure the viral load is needed.

Development and evaluation of an external quality control and internal quality control containing real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of o'nyong-nyong virus

O'nyong-nyong fever is a mosquito-borne tropical viral disease while few molecular diagnostic tools have been established for its surveillance until now. In the current study, a single-step, dual-color real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay which contained both external quality control (EQC) and internal quality control (IQC) prepared by armored RNA technique was developed and evaluated for the detection of o'nyong-nyong virus (ONNV). Results showed that the assay was established successfully without cross-reaction with genetically related or symptom-alike diseases, which showed high specificity of the assay. The coefficient of variation of the assay was 0.97%, far less than 5%, indicating good repeatability of the assay. The lower limit of detection of the assay could reach as low as 100 copies of genome equivalent. During evaluation, the assay could correctly detect ONNV from spiked human serum samples and Anopheles species mosquito samples, while no ONNV positive was observed either from serum samples of patients with acute febrile illness or from local Anopheles species mosquitoes, suggesting no ONNV had been transmitted locally. In conclusion, the assay could potentially provide a valuable platform for ONNV molecular detection, which may improve the preparedness for future o'nyong-nyong fever outbreaks.

PERFORMANCE OF RAPID ANTIGEN TEST IN COMPARISON TO REAL-TIME RT-PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF COVID-19 INFECTION: A SHORT STUDY

Objective: The global pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still spreading. Because of this, it is urgently necessary to develop quick, easy, and accurate assays to identify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. For the purpose of diagnosing COVID-19 cases, the quick SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s performance attributes should be assessed and contrasted with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Methods: A retrospective analysis was done during January to May, 2022 at IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India. 2842 paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the hospital for Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) and RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RAT. Results: Of 2842 samples, 229 (8%) were positive, and 2613 (92%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 77.29% (177 out of 229) and 99.54% (2601 out of 2613), respectively. Positive predictive value was 93.65% and negative predictive value was 93% with the Ct value ≤35 of real-time RT-PCR result. Conclusion: RAT-positive samples are also positive by real-time RT-PCR test though RAT-negative patient with symptom, should further test for real-time RT-PCR as sensitivity is bit low particularly in symptomatic patient respect to real-time RT-PCR result. Hence, we can conclude that specificity- and sensitivity-wise real-time RT-PCR method is best, but during pandemic/outbreak situation, RAT is good alternative for fast screening and point-of-care test of COVID-19 detection.

RAPID DETECTION OF SARS COV-2 INFECTION IN COMPARISION WITH RT-PCR IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Objectives: The goal of the present study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s performance features and compare them to the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, the gold standard test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 cases. Methods: From October 2020 to May 2021, patients attending the OPD, including those undergoing surgery, at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Telangana provided 1000 respiratory samples, primarily nasopharyngeal swabs. A skilled technician had collected two nasopharyngeal swabs from each person in a COVID sample collection room while wearing personal protective equipment and following strict infection control procedures. One swab was used for the rapid antigen test given by the standard Q COVID-19 Ag test kit and placed into the extraction buffer tube. Second swab was kept in the viral transport medium and used for Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene, Korea), which targets envelope gene (E), and RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nucleocapsid (N) genes of SARS CoV-2, was used for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results: Out of 1000 samples tested for COVID-19, 623 (63.7%) were males and 377 (36.3%) were females. Out of 1000 samples, 347 samples were RT-PCR positive and 653 were RT-PCR negative. Out of 347 RT-PCR samples positive, 341 were Rapid antigen test positive samples and six were negative. Overall sensitivity and specificity are 98.27% and 99.85%, respectively. Conclusion: The real-time RT-PCR assay’s sensitivity and specificity were comparable to those of the rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection. It can be utilized for contact tracing measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic in places such as border crossings, airports, interregional bus and train stations, and mass testing campaigns needing quick findings. This is especially true in areas with a high prevalence of the disease.

Cost–Utility analysis for rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease -2019

Background: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is still spreading. As a result, rapid, simple, and accurate diagnostics to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are urgently needed. For the diagnosis of COVID-19 cases, the performance characteristics of the quick SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be investigated and compared to the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The utility of the antigen detection test is reported from field evaluation. However, an interesting concern is on the utility of the test. Methods: Here, the authors perform a cost utility analysis to appraise rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19. Results: According to the analysis, the cost per utility of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is 3.24 times less than that of comparison versus real-time RT-PCR assay. Conclusion: Hence, it can conclude that rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay is appropriate for using for diagnosis of COVID-19 in term of cost–utility.

Development and Validation of a Novel COVID-19 nsp8 One-Tube RT-LAMP-CRISPR Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.

Accurate and simple diagnostic tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are essential components of the pandemic response. In this study, we evaluated a one-tube reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay coupled with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein-mediated endpoint detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in clinical samples. RT-LAMP-CRISPR is fast and affordable, does not require bulky thermocyclers, and minimizes carryover contamination risk. Results can be read either visually or with a fluorometer. RT-LAMP-CRISPR assays using primers targeting a highly expressed nsp8 gene and previously described nucleocapsid (N) gene primers were designed. The analytical characteristics and diagnostic performance of RT-LAMP-CRISPR assays were compared to those of a commercial real-time RT-PCR E gene assay. The limits of detection (LODs) of the nsp8 and N RT-LAMP-CRISPR assays were 750 and 2,000 copies/mL, which were higher than that of the commercial real-time RT-PCR assay (31.3 copies/mL). Despite the higher LOD, RT-LAMP-CRISPR assays showed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 98.6% and 100%, respectively, equivalent to those of the real-time RT-PCR assay (P = 0.5). The median fluorescence reading from the nsp8 assay (378.3 raw fluorescence unit [RFU] [range, 215.6 to 592.6]) was significantly higher than that of the N gene assay (342.0 RFU [range, 143.0 to 576.6]) (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, we demonstrate that RT-LAMP-CRISPR assays using primers rationally designed from highly expressed gene targets are highly sensitive, specific, and easy to perform. Such assays are a valuable asset in resource-limited settings. IMPORTANCE Accurate tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are important for timely treatment and infection control decisions. Conventional tests such as real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) require specialized equipment and are expensive. On the other hand, rapid antigen tests suffer from a lack of sensitivity. In this study, we describe a novel assay format for the diagnosis of COVID-19 that is based on principles of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas chemistry. A major advantage of this assay format is that it does not require expensive equipment to perform, and results can be read visually. This method proved to be fast, easy to perform, and inexpensive. The test compared well against an RT-PCR assay in terms of the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples. No false-positive test results were observed. The new assay format is ideal for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in resource-limited settings.

Genetic diversity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and evaluation of three one-step real-time RT-PCR assays in Korea

BackgroundPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has caused huge economic losses in the global swine industry. Frequent genetic variations in this virus cause difficulties in controlling and accurately diagnosing PRRSV.MethodsIn this study, we investigated the genetic characteristics of PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 circulating in Korea from January 2018 to September 2021 and evaluated three one-step real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays.ResultsA total of 129 lung samples were collected, consisting of 47 samples for PRRSV-1, 62 samples for PRRSV-2, and 20 PRRSV-negative samples. Nucleotide sequence analysis of open reading frames (ORFs) 5, ORF6, and ORF7 genes from PRRSV samples showed that PRRSV-1 belonged to subgroup A (43/47, 91.49%) and subgroup C (4/47, 8.51%), whereas PRRSV-2 was classified as lineage 1 (25/62, 40.32%), Korean lineage (Kor) C (13/62, 20.97%), Kor B (10/62, 16.13%), lineage 5 (9/62, 14.52%), and Kor A (5/62, 8.06%). Amino acid sequence analysis showed that the neutralizing epitope and T cell epitope of PRRSV-1, and the decoy epitope region and hypervariable regions of PRRSV-2 had evolved under positive selection pressure. In particular, the key amino acid substitutions were found at positions 102 and 104 of glycoprotein 5 (GP5) in some PRRSV-2, and at positions 10 and 70 of membrane protein (M) in most PRRSV-2. In addition, one-step real-time RT-PCR assays, comprising two commercial tests and one test recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), were evaluated.ConclusionThe results revealed that two of the real-time RT-PCR assays had high sensitivities and specificities, whereas the real-time RT-PCR assay of the OIE had low sensitivity due to mismatches between nucleotides of Korean PRRSVs and forward primers. In this study, we genetically characterized recent PRRSV occurrences and evaluated three one-step real-time RT-PCR assays used in Korea.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 VOC-Omicron using commercial sample-to-answer real-time RT-PCR platforms and melting curve-based SNP assays

ObjectivesThe World Health Organization (WHO) had designated the SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.529 as the new Variant of Concern Omicron (VOC-Omicron) on 26th November 20211. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) tests were widely employed to detect SARS-CoV-2 and its variant. Yet, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection performance of commercial real-time RT-PCR platforms and SARS-CoV-2 spike SNP assays remain to be elucidated.MethodsIn the first part of this study, we evaluated the VOC-Omicron detection performance of three commercial RT-PCR sample-to-answer platforms i.e. Roche cobas® 6800/8800, Roche cobas® Liat®, and Cepheid GeneXpert® systems. The detection performances were compared to one commercial conventional real-time RT-PCR assay (TIB MOLBIOL LightMix Modular SARS and Wuhan CoV E-gene) and one in-house real-time RT-PCR assay targeting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene of SARS-CoV-2 in the WHO COVID-19 Reference Laboratory at Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. In the second part of this study, we evaluated the SNP detection performance of four TIB MOLBIOL melting curve-based assays (1. Spike S371L/S373P, 2. Spike E484A, 3. Spike E484K and 4. Spike N501Y) in clinical samples obtained from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong. The SNP results were compared to whole genome sequences generated by Illumina platform.ResultsThe VOC-Omicron detection limits of three commercial sample-to-answer assays were tested to be ≤ 2.35 Log10 dC/ml. The detection performances of the sample-to-answer platforms were comparable to the two tested conventional real-time RT-PCR assays. The test sensitivities of TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P assay and the Spike E484A assays were 100% and 96.6% respectively and the test specificities of both assays were 100%. An aberrant melting peak at Tm 42-44°C was observed when the specimens with Omicron variant were tested with the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484K assay. Notably, the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike N501Y assay failed to detect the spike N501Y mutation of Omicron variant in the tested specimens.ConclusionsThe SARS-CoV-2 detection sensitivity of three commercial platforms, Roche cobas® 6800/8800, Roche cobas® Liat®, and Cepheid GeneXpert® systems were shown not to be impacted by the large number of mutations of VOC-Omicron. Also, the signature mutations i.e. Spike S371L/Spike S373P and Spike E484A in VOC-Omicron were correctly identified by the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P and VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484A assays. Unexpected findings including a shifted melting peak or absence of amplification curve/melting peak were observed when specimens with Omicron variant were tested with the TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484K assay and Spike N501Y assay, suggesting a potential alert for Omicron variant, prior confirmation by whole genome sequencing.

Presumptive positive with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay due to N mutations in the Delta variant

The Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay is 1 of the several real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays that received Emergency Use Authorization from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Here we report 4 SARS-CoV-2 samples that were reported as presumptive positives on the Cepheid platform while reported as positives on alternative RT-PCR platforms. Whole genome sequencing indicated that the samples were Delta variants and had point mutations in the N gene which potentially interfered with SARS-CoV-2 detection. Two types of point mutations were found in these samples in the US CDC 2019-nCoV Real time PCR N2 Probe region: C29203T and C29200T. C29203T is a novel point mutation, and C29200T has not been previously reported in the Delta variants. This underlines the fact that mutations in the real-time RT-PCR assay target region could hinder accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Assessment of Saliva Specimens' Reliability for COVID-19 Surveillance.

The aim of the present study is to assess saliva as a reliable specimen for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), especially in community mass screening programs. The performance analysis considered 1,221 total samples [nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and corresponding saliva], tested by means of a reference diagnostic real-time RT-PCR assay. Conflicting results were further investigated with a second, more sensitive, reference assay. Analysis of agreement showed a good concordance (95.82%), with a k coefficient value of.74 (p < 0.001); moreover, a follow-up analysis revealed the presence of viral gene targets in saliva samples at the time point the corresponding NP swabs turned negative. Data obtained prove the reliability of this alternative biofluid for SARS-CoV-2 detection in real-time RT-PCR. Considering the role of saliva in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and pathogenesis, and the advantages in the use of salivary diagnostics, the present validation supports the use of saliva as an optimal choice in large-scale population screening and monitoring of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-COV2 Virus in comparison with real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide. Antigen point-of-care tests are needed to help speed up the testing of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay to the SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Materials and Methods: COVID-19 infection suspected patients and contact individuals provided 185 respiratory samples (mostly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs) during the study from April to June 2021. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test was compared to the real-time RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in respiratory specimens. Results: By real-time RT-PCR testing, 80 (43.2%) of 185 respiratory samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, while 105 (56.8%) were negative. The sensitivity and specificity of the fast SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test were 63.1% and 90.1%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the fast assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection were comparable to those of the real-time RT-PCR assay. As a result, the rapid and easy SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test could be used as a screening assay.

A Multiallelic Molecular Beacon-Based Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Emerging infectious viruses have led to global advances in the development of specific and sensitive detection techniques. Viruses have an inherent potential to easily mutate, presenting major hurdles for diagnostics and requiring methods capable of detecting genetically diverse viral strains. One such infectious agent is severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which emerged in December 2019 and has resulted in the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study presents a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) detection assay for SARS-CoV-2, taking into account its intrinsic polymorphic nature that arises due to genetic drift and recombination, as well as the possibility of continuous and multiple introductions of genetically nonidentical strains into the human population. This advance was achieved by using mismatch-tolerant molecular beacons designed to specifically detect the SARS-CoV-2 S, E, M, and N genes. These were applied to create a simple and reproducible real-time RT-PCR assay, which was validated using external quality control panels (QCMD: CVOP20, WHO: SARS-CoV-2-EQAP-01) and clinical samples. This assay was designed for high target detection accuracy and specificity and can also be readily adapted for the detection of other emerging and rapidly mutating pathogens.

Point of care real-time polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic for Kyasanur forest disease

ObjectivesDue to the remote forest area locations of sporadic cases and outbreaks of Kyasanur forest disease (KFD), rapid diagnosis poses a significant challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Truenat KFD, a simple, rapid and user-friendly point-of-care test for detection of KFD and compare diagnostic accuracy with conventional real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Truenat KFD can be deployed in a field laboratory setting. MethodsThe study involved 145 clinical specimens, including human serum, monkey necropsy tissues and tick pool, to validate Truenat KFD (Molbio Diagnostics Pvt.Ltd.) for KFD diagnosis. ResultsWe have optimized and validated the microchip-based Truenat KFD (Molbio Diagnostics Pvt.Ltd.) for KFD diagnosis. Point-of-care testing was highly sensitive and specific, with a detection limit of up to 10 copies of KFD viral RNA. Results were comparable with the gold-standard TaqMan and commercially available Altona RealStar AHFV / KFDV real-time RT-PCR assays. Screening results for human, monkey and tick specimens were 100% concordant across the assays. ConclusionTruenat KFD(Molbio Diagnostics Pvt.Ltd.) was found to be highly sensitive and specific with a significant limit of detection. This point-of-care test would be useful in rapid diagnosis of KFD in remote and/or field settings, quick patient management and control of virus spread.

Retraction Note: Tumor suppressor microRNA-31 inhibits gastric carcinogenesis by targeting Smad4 and SGPP2.

To investigate the function of microRNA-31 (miR-31) in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the possible mechanisms involved in it. A quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis was performed to evaluate miR-31 expression in GC cell lines. After transfecting GC cells with miR-31 precursors, Alamar blue and apoptosis assays were used to measure the respective proliferation and apoptosis rates. SGPP2 and Smad4 expression were determined by real-time RT-PCR and western blot assays after miR-31 transfection. Animal assay was used to further investigate miR-31 in the pathogenesis of GC. miR-31 was significantly reduced in GC tissues and GC cell lines, and that the reduced miR-31 was associated with distant metastasis and GC clinical pathological stages, miR-31 was lower at stages III/IV than that at stage II. SGPP2 and Smad4 were proven to be the direct target of miR-31. SGPP2 and Smad4 at mRNA and protein levels were negatively correlated with miR-31 in human GC tissues and cancer cell lines. Increased miR-31 significantly repressed SGPP2 and Smad4 at transcriptional and translational levels. Functional studies showed that increasing miR-31 inhibited GC cell proliferation, promoted apoptosis and attenuated cell migration, which were also linked to downregulation of STAT3. In vivo, miR-31 inhibited GC cell growth in tumor-bearing mice. This study has revealed miR-31 as a tumor suppressor and has identified SGPP2 and Smad4 as novel targets of miR-31, linking to STAT3 for regulating cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration in GC. Therefore, miR-31 could be a useful biomarker for monitoring GC development and progression, and also could have a therapeutic potential by targeting SGPP2, Smad4 and STAT3 for GC therapy.

Novel dual multiplex real-time RT-PCR assays for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus using the BD MAX open system

ABSTRACT SARS-CoV-2 has spread rapidly, causing deaths worldwide. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the BD MAX Open System module for identifying viral pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, in nasopharyngeal specimens from individuals with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. We developed and validated a rapid total nucleic acid extraction method based on real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the reliable, high-throughput simultaneous detection of common cold viral pathogens using the BD MAX Platform. The system was evaluated using 205 nasopharyngeal swab clinical samples. For assessment of the limit of detection (LoD), we used SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA standards. The BD MAX dual multiplex real-time RT-PCR panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the World Health Organization-recommended SARS-CoV-2 assay with an LoD of 50 copies/PCR. The LoD of influenza A/B and RSV was 100–200 copies/PCR. The overall percent agreement between the BD MAX panel and laboratory-developed RT-PCR test on 55 SARS-CoV-2-positive clinical samples was 100%. Among the 55 positive cases of COVID-19 analysed, no coinfection was detected. The BD MAX rapid multiplex PCR provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV.

Surveillance of dengue virus in individual Aedes aegypti mosquitoes collected concurrently with suspected human cases in Tarlac City, Philippines

BackgroundVector control measures are critical for the prevention and reduction of dengue virus (DENV) transmission. Effective vector control is reliant not only on knowledge of mosquito abundance, but also on the timely and accurate detection of mosquito-borne infection. Mosquito-based virus surveillance programs typically rely on pool-based mosquito testing, although whether individual-based mosquito testing is a feasible alternative to this has not been widely studied. Applying an individual-based mosquito testing approach, we conducted a 1-month surveillance study of DENV in adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in homes of suspected dengue patients during the 2015 peak dengue season in Tarlac City, Philippines to more accurately assess the mosquito infection rate and identify the DENV serotypes and genotypes concurrently co-circulating in mosquitoes and patients there.MethodsWe performed a one-step multiplex real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for the simultaneous detection and serotyping of DENV in patients and individual female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. Additionally, we performed sequencing and phylogenetic analyses to further characterize the detected DENV serotypes in mosquitoes and patients at the genotype level.ResultsWe collected a total of 583 adult Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, of which we individually tested 359 female mosquitoes for the presence of DENV. Ten (2.8%) of the 359 female mosquitoes were positive for the presence of DENV. We detected DENV-1, DENV-2, and DENV-4 in the field-collected mosquitoes, which was consistent with the serotypes concurrently found in infected patients. Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses of the detected DENV serotypes based on the partial sequence of the evelope (E) gene revealed three genotypes concurrently present in the sampled mosquitoes and patients during the study period, namely DENV-1 genotype IV, DENV-2 Cosmopolitan genotype, and DENV-4 genotype II.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the utility of a one-step multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the individual-based DENV surveillance of mosquitoes. Our findings reinforce the importance of detecting and monitoring virus activity in local mosquito populations, which are critical for dengue prevention and control.

Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand

BackgroundThe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world. Hence, there is an urgent need for rapid, simple, and accurate tests to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Performance characteristics of the rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be evaluated and compared with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases.MethodsThe rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test, Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag kit (SD Biosensor®, Republic of Korea), was compared with the real-time RT-PCR test, Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene®, Korea) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens. Four hundred fifty-four respiratory samples (mainly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs) were obtained from COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals, including pre-operative patients at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand during March–May 2020.ResultsOf 454 respiratory samples, 60 (13.2%) were positive, and 394 (86.8%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The duration from onset to laboratory test in COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals ranged from 0 to 14 days with a median of 3 days. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 98.33% (95% CI, 91.06–99.96%) and 98.73% (95% CI, 97.06–99.59%), respectively. One false negative test result was from a sample with a high real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), while five false positive test results were from specimens of pre-operative patients.ConclusionsThe rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection showed comparable sensitivity and specificity with the real-time RT-PCR assay. Thus, there is a potential use of this rapid and simple SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test as a screening assay.

Pooling of Upper Respiratory Specimens Using a SARS-CoV-2 Real-time RT-PCR Assay Authorized for Emergency Use in Low-Prevalence Populations for High-Throughput Testing.

BackgroundNucleic acid amplification testing is a critical tool for addressing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Specimen pooling can increase throughput and conserve testing resources but requires validation to ensure that reduced sensitivity does not increase the false-negative rate. We evaluated the performance of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use for pooled testing of upper respiratory specimens.MethodsPositive specimens were selected from 3 prevalence groups, 1%–3%, >3%–6%, and >6%–10%. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was assessed by pooling single-positive specimens with 3 negative specimens; performance was assessed using Passing-Bablok regression. Additionally, we assessed the distributions of RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for 3091 positive specimens.ResultsPPA was 100% for the 101 pooled specimens. There was a linear relationship between Ct values for pooled and single-tested specimens (r = 0.96–0.99; slope ≈ 1). The mean pooled Ct shifts at 40 cycles were 2.38 and 1.90, respectively, for the N1 and N3 targets. The median Cts for 3091 positive specimens were 25.9 (N1) and 24.7 (N3). The percentage of positive specimens with Cts between 40 and the shifted Ct was 1.42% (N1) and 0.0% (N3).ConclusionsPooled and individual testing of specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated 100% agreement, which demonstrates the viability of pooled specimens for SARS-COV-2 testing using a dual-target RT-PCR system. Pooled specimen testing can help increase testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 with a low risk of false-negative results.

Rapid Development and Validation of a Novel Laboratory-Derived Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

ObjectivesTo increase testing capability for SARS-CoV-2 during a rapidly evolving public health emergency, we aimed to deploy a validated laboratory-developed real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 on an accelerated timeline and using reagent supply chains that were not constrained.MethodsA real-time RT-PCR assay that detects the structural envelope (E) gene of SARS-CoV-2 was developed and validated on the Roche cobas 6800 instrument platform with the omni Utility channel reagents, which performs automated nucleic acid extraction and purification, PCR amplification, and detection. In silico analysis was performed for both inclusivity of all SARS-CoV-2 variants and cross reactivity with other pathogenic organisms. Positive control material was used to determine the Limit of Detection (LOD) and patient samples (positive and negative) confirmed by another authorized assay were used for clinical validation. Experiments were carried out at the Christiana Care Health System’s Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (Newark, DE) between April 1 and April 4, 2020.ResultsA real-time RT-PCR assay for SARS-Cov-2 was developed and validated in just two weeks. For all oligonucleotides, 100% homology to the available SARS-CoV-2 sequences was observed. Greater than 80% homology between one or more oligonucleotides was observed for SARS-Cov (Urbani strain) and Influenza A, however risk of cross reactivity was deemed to be low. The limit of detection (LOD) of the assay was 250 copies/mL. The assay identified 100% of positive patient samples (30/30) and 100% of negative patient samples (29/29 patient negatives and 1/1 saline). Up to 92 samples can be run on a single plate and analysis takes approximately 3.5 hours.ConclusionsIn this work, we demonstrate the development and validation of a single target laboratory-developed test for SARS-CoV-2 in two weeks. Key considerations for complementary supply chains enabled development on an accelerated timeline and an increase in testing capability.