In against the of community, Miranda Joseph argues that the of [c]ommunity is almost always invoked as an unequivocal good, an indicator of high quality of life, life of understanding, caring, selflessness, belonging.... [It] has connoted cherished ideals of cooperation, equality, and communion (xxxiii). As Joseph also observes, however, the of identity politics of the 1980s and 1990s critiqued the underpinnings of national and other incarnations of community; it lay bare the real racism, sexism, and violence that were simultaneously perpetuated and obscured by affirmative attitudes about various communities and their peculiar manifestations. Yet, as she notes, in spite of the critical trajectory that denounced the enveloping notions of community, a celebratory discourse around it relentlessly returns (viii). In attempting to address the logic of its persistence, she suggests that capitalism is often complicit: Capitalism and, more generally, modernity depend on and generate the of to legitimate social hierarchies. [...] While identity is often named as the bond among members, it is false name in that participants are not identical and many of those to whom an identity is attributed do not participate in activities. I argue that is constituted not by identity but rather through practices of production and consumption. (viii) Such idealization about utopian state of relatedness averts the penetrating gaze that would expose real inequities. More than cursory glance would reveal that communal subjectivity is not necessarily founded in the human caring and understanding that others habitually ascribe to it but, rather, in those practices of consumption. Indebted to Raymond Williams's The Country and the City and his discussions of romantic anti-urbanism, Joseph shows how the romance of community is often determined, even driven, by these nostalgic impulses: that is, the idealization of country life, (dis)located temporally from present moment of discontent and geographically from heavily industrialized city-centre. is thus invoked as model of positive interaction, from which tenuous ethical values are generated and are held in opposition to the economic pursuits generated by modernity. So Joseph asserts: [T]he of positions as the defining other of modernity, of capitalism. This includes Romantic narrative of as prior in time to society, locating as long-lost past for which we yearn nostalgically from our current fallen state of alienation, bureaucratization, rationality. It distinguishes from society spatially, as local, involving face-to-face relations, where capital is global and faceless; is all about boundaries between us and them, boundaries that are naturalized through reference to place or race or culture or identity, while capital would seem to denature, crossing all borders and making everything, everyone, equivalent. (1) Community is thus endowed with sense of nostalgia and alleged to be resistant to, rather than complicit with, capitalism. Conversely, the latter is characterized as destructive entity that disables genuine interaction and undermines identity. The nostalgia for community, which Joseph sees as characteristic of critical thought, also marks some of the literary criticism of Duncan Campbell Scott's In the Village of Viger. Recent criticism determines the book to be an achievement for its sophisticated, complex, and realistic rendering of this small village located in Quebec (see, for example, New 47). The criticism more contemporary to the collection's initial date of publication, however, valued its pastoral elements and regarded the depicted therein as being eroded by the compounded influences of the city, modernity, and industrialization. …