Following the end of the Cold War there was a need for new order in the world, but such an order that would not lead to another conflict. It was a very difficult task, which was to be proven by the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan. Neither Americans nor Europeans wanted to allow the others to have any advantage. Each party valued its independence and thought that its visions concerning crucial decisions were right. Both Europeans and Americans wanted to avoid conflicts, hence the aspiration to changes in the security issue. However, critical situations were supposed to verify the power of prior decisions and the willingness for real co-operation. In the course of time some reservations and accusations related to important issues appeared. The establishment of the European Union, NATO and all the decrees of these institutions, unfortunately were not able to solve conflicts. The attacks of 9/11 and the different approach towards war on terror further deteriorated the tense situation. The issue of war in Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein put the quality of the transatlantic relations to the test again. Every party had its own arguments and was ready to defend them. Some other important questions appeared. Is war in Iraq necessary? Is its waging in accordance with the international law and all conventions? All of these issues have questioned the transatlantic relations. Additionally, the disproportion of military might between both sides does not contribute to fruitful co-operation either. Therefore, is it possible to formulate and pursue a policy satisfying both sides? Will the next crucial decisions and problems unite Americans and Europeans or irretrievably divide them? Time will tell.
Read full abstract