During 1980, adult largemouth bass diets in Peter and Paul lakes (Michigan's Upper Peninsula), included prey ranging in size from zooplankton (e.g., Daphnia) to vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, reptiles and small mammals). A partial winterkill in 1980-1981 reduced bass populations in both lakes by as much as 50%. Given the observed reduction in adult bass density and presumed reduction in intraspecific competition for food in 1981, we anticipated dietary changes as a consequence of more food being available to each surviving bass. Two approaches to foraging theory were compared in this study. Functional response models predict that density-dependent effects should be seen simply as increased numbers of each prey type eaten and that all prey will remain in the diet. By contrast, optimal foraging theory predicts that an increase in overall prey density will result in lower ranked prey items being dropped from the diet in an inverse order of ranking; the forager should become more specialized as net energy gain increases. Our data demonstrate opportunism in bass foraging behavior but provide support for the general tenets of optimal foraging theory. Large prey in the size range of the cost-curve nadir of adult bass were more abundant in the 1981 stomach samples. Lowest-ranked prey (e.g., Daphnia) became less important in 1981. Overall diet breadth of bass decreased. Growth rates of adult bass were greater in 1981 than 1980. INTRODUCTION Two somewhat different approaches to the study of diet selection have emerged in recent decades. One is based on experimental analysis of the functional components of the predation process (Ivlev, 1961; Holling, 1966). This approach is represented in reviews by Nilsson (1978), O'Brien (1979) and Dill (1983). In general, mechanistic analyses of the predator's perceptive capabilities, behavioral responses, mechanical capabilities and motivational state are combined in what are generally termed functional response models to yield predictions of predation rates on each of the available prey types. A second class of models is derived from extensions of experimental, mechanistic studies that emphasize optimization by the predator. The basic ideas of MacArthur and Pianka (1966) and Emlen (1966) have been expanded to include a theory of diet breadth or diversity (Schoener, 1971). Various published symposia and monographs include reviews of this perspective (Kamil and Sargent, 1981; Pyke, 1984) and its application to fishes (Stroud and Clepper, 1979). Laboratory and field studies have demonstrated the applicability of the optimality approach to foraging by fishes (Werner and Hall, 1974; Vince et al., 1976; Werner, 1979; Mittlebach, 1981; Stoner, 1982). Other models based simply on measures of reactive distance and the probability of successful capture (i.e., functional response models) offer equally tenable correspondence between expected and observed results (reviewed by Dunbrack and Dill, 1983). More recently, evaluation of the constraints imposed on foraging behavior has been developed to assess the roles of predator avoidance (Werner and Gilliam, 1984) and the biomechanical components of prey perception (Li et al., 1985). Although both optimality and functional components will probably