Reoperation Rate Research Articles

Preoperative Anxiety: An Important Risk Factor of Postoperative Adverse Events and Increased Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

Introduction: With the rising prevalence of mental health disorders, it is important to consider their correlation with surgical outcomes. Anxiety has been associated with adverse events after many surgical procedures, but its relationship relative to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) regarding medical complications has not previously been assessed in a large database study. Methods: The 2010-Q3 2022 PearlDiver Mariner161 database was used to identify patients undergoing single-level ACDF. Those with versus without preoperative anxiety were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Rates of 90-day adverse events were compared by multivariate regression analyses, and 5-year cervical revision surgery rates were compared. Results: Of 287,278 ACDF patients, preoperative anxiety was identified for 36.73%. After matching, patients with anxiety had greater odds ratios of all assessed individual 90-day adverse outcomes, as well as any (OR: 3.09), severe (OR: 2.07), and minor (OR: 3.39) adverse events (P < 0.0001 for all). Those with preoperative anxiety had slightly greater 5-year rates of subsequent cervical spine surgery than those without (P < 0.0001, at 5 years 12.9% versus 11.7%). Discussion: ACDF patients with a history of anxiety had higher odds of many 90-day adverse outcomes and slightly higher 5-year revision surgery rates. These findings may inform patient counseling and risk management strategies.

Addressing meniscal deficiency part 1: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on meniscal allograft transplantation

AbstractPurposeMeniscal injuries are common in the young and active population. There is increasing utilization of surgical interventions like meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) to restore the protective function of menisci following injury leading to meniscal deficiency. Extensive research and publications exist on the management of meniscal injury and the sequalae of meniscal deficiency. However, a comprehensive synthesis of the existing evidence through an umbrella review is lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a current examination of the literature on MAT.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases to identify relevant systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the AMSTAR‐2 tool.ResultsA total of 41 studies were included in the review, with most published within the last decade. The majority of studies (56.1%) received a ‘Critically Low’ confidence rating, 26.8% were rated as ‘Low’, and only 14.6% were rated as ‘High’ confidence. From the included studies, 51.2% reported on PROMs, with the Lysholm score being the most common. Transplant failure and reoperation rate were reported in 34.1% and 19.5% of studies respectively. Studies on MAT reported favourable short‐term outcomes in terms of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) but were limited by the lack of randomized control trials and consistent comparison groups.ConclusionsThis umbrella review highlights an increase in interest in MAT but underscores the need for higher‐quality reviews with standardized reporting and rigorous methodologies. Future research should focus on long‐term outcomes, optimal surgical techniques, patient selection criteria and risk factors for transplant failure. There is also a need for more studies focusing on MAT in pediatric populations. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive assessment of the current state of research in MAT and identifies areas for improvement in future studies.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.

Clinical outcomes and complications of a non-modular dual-mobility acetabular device, minimum 2 years follow-up.

Non-modular dual-mobility (DM) acetabular bearing constructs are becoming more popular due to their potential advantages for addressing range of motion (ROM) and stability. The objective of this post-market clinical study was to assess clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction, pain and function, survivorship, and component positioning, in patients ⩾2 years after primary THA using non-modular DM acetabular components. This retrospective, multicentre study evaluated complications and functional outcomes in recipients of non-modular DM acetabular constructs at least 2 years post-THA. Our primary outcomes included the dislocation rate and mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (HOOS). Secondary outcomes included radiographic measurements, patient satisfaction, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and survivorship. 316 eligible patients enrolled in this study across 3 sites, including 168 men (53%) and 148 women (47%). The cohort averaged 5.37 years post-THA (range 2.2-10.1 years) at the study visit. The mean FJS, HHS, and HOOS were good to excellent, with values of 82.3, 90.7, and 92.0, respectively. Patient satisfaction averaged 4.68, between "Very Good" (4) and "Excellent" (5). Minimal radiolucent lines (RLL) surrounded the acetabulum. More RLL surrounded the femur, but most lines were less than 1 mm (4.7% of the study population). There were few adverse events (4 events, 1.3%). Three revisions were performed (0.9%), with one patient requiring removal of the acetabular cup. The high mid- to long-term survivorship and low to no dislocation and reoperation rates indicate this acetabular DM device is a viable option for THA patients. The patient metrics reflect satisfaction, alleviated pain, and restored function with a low risk of adverse outcomes.

The Role of Helmet Therapy in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review

AbstractThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of helmet therapy (HT) as a treatment for craniosynostosis, with a focus on the outcomes of skull morphology, reoperation rate, complications of HT, and quality of life of patients who receive it. A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review utilized the PICO format: Does HT following strip craniectomy (SC) improve outcomes (outcome) compared to SC alone (comparison) in patients undergoing craniosynostosis correction (intervention)? Searches were performed from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022, using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Medline databases. Study quality was evaluated using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) quality assessment scale. Fourteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Among these, 438 patients underwent SC-HT, while 104 patients underwent SC without HT. The preoperative cephalic indices for sagittal craniosynostosis in the HT and non-HT groups were 66.8 and 67.8, respectively, which improved postoperatively to 75 and 76.2, respectively. Limited long-term follow-up hindered a definitive assessment of reoperation rates. Complication rates related to HT were low at approximately 2.9%, primarily consisting of skin irritation. Parental satisfaction was high, correlating with a strong compliance rate. Existing literature does not demonstrate a clear superiority between SC with or without HT for treating nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. Outcomes appear comparable, but evidence is constrained by the predominance of single-center retrospective studies with limited methodological rigor. There is a pressing need for international multicenter trials to furnish more robust and generalizable findings.

Antibiotic-Loaded Hydrogel for the Treatment of Lower-Limb Fracture-Related Infections: A Single Center's Multidisciplinary Experience.

A fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication of an orthopedic trauma, often leading to challenging treatments and poor outcomes. The surgical strategies are typically categorized into one-stage or two-stage procedures, with the use of systemic and local antibiotics being crucial for infection management. This study assessed the efficacy of an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel (ALH) applied over the internal fixation devices for treating FRIs, comparing the outcomes between the one-stage (OS) and two-stage (TS) reconstructions. This retrospective study included 17 patients with an FRI treated using the ALH at a single center. The patients were divided into OS and TS reconstruction groups. The data on demographics, surgical procedures, antibiotic regimens, and outcomes were collected. The primary and secondary outcomes included the infection cure rate, bone union, complications, and reoperation rates. Among the 17 patients (mean age 48.5 years, 16 males), infections were predominantly in the tibia, with 12 chronic and 5 acute cases. Seven patients had monomicrobial infections, and nine had multidrug-resistant pathogens. No significant differences were found between the OS and TS groups in terms of the infection cure rate, bone union, or complications. One patient in the OS group experienced an infection recurrence, and bone healing was achieved in all but one case. Additional complications included delayed wound closure in two cases and implant failure in one case, requiring a reoperation. The ALH demonstrated potential as an effective local antibiotic treatment for FRIs, particularly in the one-stage reconstructions, allowing for a safe application of internal fixation devices. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups is needed to validate these findings.

Comparative study on anterior pelvic plating and pubic ramus screw fixation for straddle fracture: a matched-pair outcome analysis.

Straddle fractures involving both the superior and inferior rami often require surgical fixation due to instability. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of pubic ramus screw fixation (PRSF) and anterior pelvic plating (APP) for the treatment of these fractures to identify the superior method. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients (37 males, 33 females; average age 47.6 years) treated surgically for straddle fractures at two Level 1 trauma centres between May 2017 and August 2022. The patients were divided into two groups, where 26 underwent PRSF and 44 underwent APP. The groups were matched based on preoperative characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index, injury mechanism, and severity. The key variables analysed included operation time, blood transfusion volume, early weight-bearing capability, and complication and reoperation rates. After matching, PRSF was associated with a shorter operative time (71.0min vs. 118.3min for APP, p < 0.0009) and lower blood transfusion requirements (0 units vs. 1 unit, p < 0.0001). Postoperatively, 61.5% of PRSF patients tolerated early weight-bearing, compared to none in the APP group. However, in two cases, PRSF could not be performed due to severe comminution or anatomical limitations, necessitating conversion to APP. Complication rates were similar between the groups (30.8% for PRSF vs. 27.3% for APP, p = 0.93). PRSF demonstrated advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced blood transfusions, and earlier weight-bearing. However, APP remains valuable for complex fracture patterns. Treatment should be individualized based on fracture complexity and patient-specific factors to optimize outcomes.

Treatment of post-thalamic hemorrhage hydrocephalus: ventriculoperitoneal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy? A retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of hydrocephalus after thalamic hemorrhage (TH) where external ventricular drainage (EVD) could not be removed after hematoma absorption, and to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of hydrocephalus after TH.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with hydrocephalus after TH whose EVD could not be removed after hematoma absorption were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients’ surgical methods, the patients were divided into the VPS group and ETV group. The operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, and reoperation rates of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay between the two groups. The EVD tubes were successfully removed in all patients after surgery. There were 4 (9.5%) complications in the ETV group and 3 (6.7%) complications in the VPS group, with no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. During the 1-year follow-up, 7 patients (16.7%) in the ETV group and 3 patients (6.7%) in the VPS group required reoperation. In the subgroup analysis of TH combined with fourth ventricular hemorrhage, 6 patients (14.3%) in the ETV group and 1 patient (2.2%) in the VPS group required reoperation, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant.ConclusionsETV had good efficacy in treating hydrocephalus caused by TH and TH that broke into the lateral ventricle and the third ventricle. However, if hydrocephalus was caused by TH with the fourth ventricular hematoma, VPS was a better surgical method because the recurrence rate of hydrocephalus in ETV was higher than that in VPS. Therefore, the choice of surgical method should be based on the patient’s clinical features and hematoma location.

Return to Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes after Cervical and Lumbar Motion Preservation Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Systematic Review. The primary purpose of this article was to survey the present literature and report on return to play outcomes in elite athletes after undergoing motion preservation spinal surgery. For elite performance, athletes require adequate mobility and throughout the trunk, torso, and spine to achieve maximal force production. Therefore, elite athletes that have failed conservative treatment may seek to undergo motion preserving surgical options such as total disc arthroplasty and lumbar microdiscectomy. Individual studies have reported on return to play (RTP) outcomes following individual motion preservation surgical procedures, no systematic reviews have formally to reported on RTP outcomes, post-operative performance, and reoperation rates on these procedures in elite athletes. A systematic review was conducted from inception until February 2024 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. One reviewer queried PubMed for relevant studies that reported on RTP outcomes in elite athletes following motion preservation spinal surgery (MPSS) based on title and abstract (n=1,404). After the original search query, an additional reviewer screened full length articles. A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Special consideration was given to RTP rates, post-operative performance, and reoperation rates. A total of 612 elite athletes from the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Football League, National Hockey League, and other professional sporting organizations underwent cervical and lumbar MPSS to treat various spinal pathologies. Various motion sparing techniques were used to treat various pathologies. After undergoing MPSS, RTP rates ranged from 75-100% for lumbar cases and 83.3-100% for cervical cases. Most athletes successfully returned to sport between. Post-operative performance varied with some athletes performing at the same level prior to surgery and some performing at a decreased level. Motion preservation spinal surgery is a feasible option when properly indicated. Future studies are needed to compare return to sport rates, post-operative performance, and re-operation rates between motion preservation spinal surgery to spinal arthrodesis.

Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeAnastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644.ResultsFive observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09–1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33–1.84; p = 0.57); respectively.ConclusionThe use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.

Correction: SHIELD study: Reoperation Rate in Breast-Conserving Surgery using Confocal Histolog Scanner for Intraoperative Margin Assessment – Interim Results

Correction: SHIELD study: Reoperation Rate in Breast-Conserving Surgery using Confocal Histolog Scanner for Intraoperative Margin Assessment – Interim Results

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy or uterine preservation: A metanalysis and systematic review.

Literature is lacking strong evidence about comparisons of efficacy and quality of life-related outcomes between laparoscopic total and/or supracervical hysterectomy (LTH/LSCH) with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and minimally invasive sacrohysteropexy (LSH). To summarize and compare available data on this topic providing a useful clinical tool in the treatment decision process. We performed a systematic research of PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Gooogle Scholar. We included studies that compared at least one efficacy outcome (objective or subjective outcome) between LTH/LSCH with LSC and LSH. Data on surgery-related morbidities were also extracted where available. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (OR) between groups using Review Manager V.7.9.0. We included a total of nine observational studies. LTH/LSCH with LSH was associated with a significantly higher objective success (apical compartment OR 7.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-28.33; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001; anterior compartment OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.26-4.30; I2 = 12%; P = 0.007) and subjective success (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.42-7.17; I2 = 39%; P = 0.005). No differences were found regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications, sexual dysfunction, and stress urinary incontinence rate after surgery. Hysteropexy showed shorter operative time and shorter hospital length with a pool mean difference of 27.37 min (95% CI 18.04-32.71; I2 = 0%; P < 0.001) and 0.7 days (95% CI 0.24-1.17; I2 = 75%; P = 0.003), respectively. Concurrent hysterectomy was not associated with a higher rate of mesh-related complications (P = 0.53). No major differences were found regarding recurrence and reoperation rate (P = 0.10 and P = 0.93, respectively). LTH/LSCH with LSC has better objective and subjective outcomes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery than LSH alone, especially for apical and anterior compartments, and is not associated with higher postoperative sexual dysfunction and mesh-related complications. Adequate preoperative counseling is highly recommended in patients who desire uterine preservation. CRD42024537270.

Autograft and Allograft ACLR in Patients Greater Than 40 Years Old Have Similar Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes with Higher Rates of ACL Graft Failure in Allograft Patients

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients aged 40 and older after primary ACLR between patients that received allograft or autograft. Secondary aims included assessing the effect of pre-existing osteoarthritis on short-term PROs. MethodsA retrospective review of an ambulatory surgery center’s electronic medical record was conducted for patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2009 and 2022. Patients aged younger than 40, those who underwent index revision procedures and/or concomitant ligament repair/reconstructions, and those with incomplete baseline or short-term (1- or 2-year) KOOS scores were excluded. Allograft and autograft patients were matched according to sex and body mass index (BMI) in a 2:1 fashion. PROs used included KOOS and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at baseline and short-term follow up (minimum of 1 year). Minimum clinically important difference was calculated in a distribution-based fashion. Osteoarthritis severity was determined based on Kellgren-Lawrence grading of perioperative knee x-rays. Preexisting osteoarthritis was defined as KL grade 1 or more. ResultsA total of 331 patients were included after matching (215 allograft and 116 autograft patients). The average age was 47.7 ± 6.0 (range: 40-66). Age differed significantly between the two groups, with the allograft cohort having an average age of 48.6 ± 6.0 years and the autograft cohort having an average age of 46.1 ± 5.7 years (p < 0.001). Short-term change in KOOS and SANE scores did not differ by graft type (p = 0.154, p = 0.556, respectively). Sixty-seven percent of all patients met MCID for KOOS and 82% of patients with complete baseline and short-term SANE scores met MCID for SANE. There was a statistically significant difference in rupture rates between the allograft and autograft cohorts (n = 9 allograft vs n = 0 autograft; p = 0.030). There was no difference in re-operation rates between the autograft and allograft cohorts (p = 0.453). Perioperative Kellgren-Lawrence grading did not affect outcomes for either graft type (allograft: p = 0.905 vs. autograft: p = 0.522). ConclusionMiddle-aged patients undergoing ACLR with allograft or autograft demonstrate similar short-term patient reported outcomes. Pre-existing osteoarthritis similarly did not significantly affect short-term outcomes. However, rerupture rates were significantly higher in the allograft cohort than the autograft cohort. Level of EvidenceLevel III - Therapeutic

Late (≥60 years old) and middle adulthood (40-59 years old) patients achieve similar improvement in patient-reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction.

This study aimed to compare the range of motion (ROM), surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction outcomes in patients 60 years or older at the time of surgery to 40- to 59-year-old patients. In this retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2022, a 3:1 propensity match was performed to match late adulthood patients (≥60 years old) undergoing ACL reconstruction with middle adulthood (40-59 years old) ACL reconstruction patients. Patients were matched based on sex, ACL graft utilized and concomitant procedures performed during ACL reconstruction. Statistical analysis compared demographics, preoperative injury management, surgical outcomes, PROMs, and minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) achievement rates for all ACL reconstruction patients included. Twenty late adulthood and 60 middle adulthood patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in the final cohort. Patients who were 60 years or older experienced no difference in reoperation rate (n.s.), incidence of retears (n.s.) or ROM (n.s.) at 1 year post-operatively. There were also no differences in International Knee Documentation Committee (ΔIKDC) (31.3 ± 19.1 vs. 34.2 ± 18.2, n.s.) or ΔPCS-12 (12.4 ± 9.8 vs. 12.9 ± 10.8, n.s.) scores at 1 year post-operatively. Furthermore, the younger and older patient cohorts demonstrated similar rates of achieving the MCID (80.0% vs. 83.3%, n.s.) and SCB (50.0% vs. 61.7%, n.s.) scores for IKDC. Patients 60 years or older and 40- to 59-year-old patients demonstrated similar outcomes after undergoing ACL reconstruction with allograft. This study concludes that ACL reconstruction in late adulthood can still be a successful treatment option and should allow surgeons to feel more comfortable when performing indicated surgical intervention for older patients who experience an ACL tear. Level III, Therapeutic III, retrospective cohort study.

Posterior Cranial Vault Distractor Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Chiari Malformation Type 1: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Although posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) is utilized routinely now for the treatment of craniosynostosis, its use as a treatment option for Chiari type 1 malformation (CM1) is limited to case reports and small retrospective case series. The authors conducted a systematic review of the published literature for PVDO as a treatment for CM1. The primary outcomes were reported complications, symptom improvement, and reoperation rates in patients that had PVDO surgery for CM1. The authors further investigated differences between patients with CM1 with an associated genetic syndrome and craniosynostosis. In total, 42 patients with an average age of 41.1 months were used in our analysis. A total of 38.1% of the patients had a diagnosed syndrome, 78.6% of patients had associated craniosynostosis, and 26/42 (61.9%) total patients-reported symptom improvement. Of 26 patients that reported symptom improvement, 20 (76.9%) had associated syndromes and 6 (23.1%) did not (P=0.011). In addition, of these 26 symptom improved patients, 17 (65.4%) were associated with craniosynostosis while 9 (36.4%) did not have craniosynostosis (P=0.008). Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis seems to be a promising new surgical intervention for treatment of CM1. Most patients saw symptom improvement after treatment (61.9%). There was a clinically and statistically significant difference in symptom improvement for patients with syndromic CM1 when compared with nonsyndromic CM1 patients.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Alone Versus Limited Decompression/Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Retrospective Study.

A retrospective study. To investigate and compare the clinical and radiographical outcomes of endoscopic decompression alone and limited decompression/fusion surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). Follow-up data of 53 patients with lower limb radiculopathy associated with ADS who underwent focal surgical treatment were collected (endoscope group: 31 patients treated by transforaminal endoscopic decompression alone; fusion group: 22 patients who underwent limited decompression/fusion). The following data were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two group: the demographics, Lenke-Silva level, radiographic parameters, surgical data, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back/leg pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. The mean follow-up period was 15.68 ± 3.26 months. The most frequent Lenke-Silva level was I in the endoscope group, and III in the fusion group. Preoperative Cobb angle in the endoscope group was significantly lower than that in the fusion group (23.92 ± 9.06 vs 39.58 ± 13.12, P < 0.05). All patients exhibited improved VAS and ODI scores postoperatively (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the Cobb angle had progressed by 1.51° in the endoscope group, whereas radiographic parameters were significantly improved in the fusion group. The reoperation and complication rate in the endoscope group were lower than those in the fusion group. The satisfaction rate post-surgery was comparable between the two groups. For patients with focal ADS, both limited decompression/fusion and transforaminal endoscopic decompression are viable treatment options. Advanced transforaminal endoscopic techniques enable effective decompression of the symptomatic foramen with minimal complication risk and negligible deformity progression, even in cases of significant scoliosis. While limited fusion surgery can achieve comparable clinical outcomes, it offers inferior deformity correction.

The push-through total femoral prosthesis for revision of a total hip or knee replacement with extreme bone loss.

The aim of the present study was to assess outcomes of using the push-through total femoral prothesis (PTTF) for revision total hip replacement with extreme bone loss. 10 consecutive patients who received PTTF between 2012 and 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Primary functional outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Range of motion, complications, and ambulatory status were also recorded to assess secondary outcomes. 2 of 10 patients underwent surgery with PTTF for both knee and hip arthroplasty revision. The mean time between index surgery and PTTF was 15 years (3-32 yrs). Acetabular components were revised in 6 of 10 patients during PTTF application. After a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, hip dislocations occurred in 3 patients. All of the dislocated hips were ones with retained conventional non-constrained acetabular bearings. Patient satisfaction was high (MSTS: 67%, HHS: 61.2%, TESS 64.6%) despite high re-operation rate (40%) and minor postoperative problems. PTTF should be considered for hip and knee arthroplasty revision procedures in patients with an extreme bone defect. Consistent usage of constrained liners should be considered to avoid hip dislocation, which was our main problem following the procedure.

Functional benefit of joint surgery in patients with non-vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: results of a retrospective study

BackgroundEhlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a hereditary disease characterised by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and tissue fragility. Hypermobile EDS (hEDS is the more frequent subtype. Joint surgery may benefit certain patients after failure of medical treatments, but there is no consensus on the optimal surgical management of patients with hEDS. The aims of this retrospective study were to chart the surgical management of patients with hEDS, to determine the role of arthroscopy and to evaluate the functional results of joint surgery, including the reintervention rates.ResultsA total of 69 patients with non-vascular EDS were evaluated (60 female; 87%). Mean (SD) age at first surgery was 25.6 ± 11.1 years. Among the 69 patients, first surgeries were carried out on the knee (n = 50; 39.4%), ankle (n = 28; 22.0%), shoulder (n = 22; 17.3%), wrist (n = 18; 14.2%) and elbow (n = 9; 7.1%). One-fifth of all first operations (20.8%) were carried out by arthroscopy, most often on the knee (36% of knee surgery cases). At the time of primary surgery, the surgeon was alerted to the diagnosis or suspicion of hEDS in only 33.9% of patients. The rate of reoperations (2 to ≥ 5) was 35.7% (10/28) for the ankle, 40.9% (9/22) for the shoulder, 44.4% (4/9) for the elbow, 50% (9/18) for the wrist and 60% (30/50) for the knee. Local or regional anaesthesia was badly tolerated or ineffective in 27.8%, 36.4% and 66.6% of operations on the wrist, shoulder and elbow, respectively. Overall, the majority of patients (> 70%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, particularly on the non-dominant side. The lowest satisfaction rate was for shoulder surgery on the dominant side (58.3% dissatisfied).ConclusionsSurgery for joint instability has a greater chance of success when it is carried out in patients with a known diagnosis of EDS before surgery. The majority of patients were satisfied with their surgery and, with the exception of the knee, there was a low rate of reoperations (≤ 50%). Arthroscopic procedures have an important role to play in these patients, particularly when surgery is performed on the knee.

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Quality of Life of Endometriosis Patients after Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Background/Objectives: This study investigated the long-term effects of the surgical removal of endometriotic lesions on quality of life in endometriosis patients. A sub-analysis explored different subtypes of endometriosis, hormonal influence, and the need for reoperation. Methods: The study was conducted at the Certified Endometriosis Center of the Medical University of Vienna. Included in the study were patients who had undergone the complete surgical removal of endometriotic lesions between 2014 and 2018. Patients were asked to complete the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 preoperatively, at the short-term follow-up (six to ten weeks postoperatively), and at the long-term follow-up (median of 48 months postoperatively). Results: A total of 87 patients completed the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 at the three time points. At the long-term follow-up, the reoperation rate was 8.0%. Significant improvements in the overall quality of life (p < 0.001; median decrease from 45.0 to 11.7) and in the categories of "pain", "control and powerlessness", "social support", "emotional well-being", and "self-image" at the long-term follow-up compared to preoperative values were observed (p-values < 0.01). The sub-analysis showed that patients with deep-infiltrating endometriosis (p < 0.001; median decrease from 49.2 to 10.0) and adenomyosis (p < 0.02; median decrease from 37.5 to 0.0) had the most pronounced long-term postsurgical benefits in terms of quality of life. Patients with (p < 0.001; median decrease from 45.0 to 1.7) and without (p < 0.001; median decrease from 45.42 to 12.5) hormonal influence showed significant improvements in overall quality of life compared to preoperative values. Patients without reoperation demonstrated improved long-term quality of life compared to the preoperative (p < 0.001; median decrease from 45.8 to 9.6) and short-term follow-up results (p < 0.005; median decrease from 19.2 to 9.6). Participants who underwent reoperation showed no improvement in quality of life at the long-term follow-up. Conclusions: The surgical removal of endometriotic lesions has a positive long-term impact on the quality of life, as measured by Endometriosis Health Profile-30.

Five-year radiological outcomes between decompression alone and decompression with an interlaminar device for lumbar spinal stenosis.

There is limited literature regarding radiological outcomes in the use of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression compared to decompression alone (DA) for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This study aims to assess and compare 5-year radiological outcomes following spinal decompression and decompression with ILD (D + ILD). We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 94 patients who underwent spinal decompression with or without ILD insertion between 2007-2015. Patients with symptomatic LSS who met the study criteria were offered spinal decompression with or without ILD insertion. Those patients who accepted ILD insertion were placed in the D + ILD group (n=39); while those opting for DA, were placed in the DA group (n=55). Radiological indices were assessed preoperatively, immediate post-operative, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. There were a total of 94 patients with 55 in the DA group and 39 in the D + ILD group. In both groups, there was no significant change post-operatively in the sagittal balance parameters namely, the mean pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI - LL) during the 5-year follow-up. Comparing between the groups, there was no significant difference in sagittal balance parameters. Comparing between DA versus D + ILD, there was no significant difference in overall lordosis, but the D + ILD had a significant reduction in sagittal angle (at the index level) of 2.3° compared to the DA group (P=0.01). In the control group, there was no significant difference in the anterior disc, posterior disc and foraminal height post-operatively. In the D + ILD group, there was a significant mean increase of 1.3 mm in anterior disc height, 1.8 mm in posterior disc height and 4.7 mm in foraminal height compared to the control group. In both groups, there was significant improvement in all clinical outcomes namely 36-item short form survey physical component summary (SF36 PCS), 36-item short form survey mental component summary (SF36 MCS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Comparing the groups, there was significant improvement in the D + ILD group in SF36 MCS (P=0.01) but no difference in SF36 PCS or VAS. Reoperation rates were equivalent. Our study found that in the management of lumbar stenosis, the use of an ILD as an adjunct device compared to DA had significant improvement in anterior disc, posterior disc and foraminal height with expected focal kyphosis at the level of intervention without change in the lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance at 5 years.

Surgery on the C3-4 Level and the Presence of Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy Increases the Risk of 30-Day Reoperation Rate After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cervical myelopathy caused by C3-4 level degeneration often exhibits different characteristics after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) than other cervical levels. This study compared the outcomes of C3-4 ACDF with surgeries at other levels and identified risk factors of 30-day reoperation after ACDF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative cervical disease from 2018 to 2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the level of surgery: C3-4 and non–C3-4 groups. Radiological outcomes, including cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM), were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed with patient-reported outcomes and the rates of 30-day reoperation and complications after ACDF. Patient-reported outcomes included visual analog scale for neck pain, visual analog scale for arm pain, and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Risk factors of 30-day reoperation were assessed. RESULTS: Of 259 patients, 74 (28.6%) and 185 (71.4%) were in the C3-4 and non–C3-4 groups, respectively. The C3-4 group exhibited lower C2-7 ROM (P = .019), higher C3-4 ROM (P = .015), and greater C3-4 %ROM (P = .014). The C3-4 group demonstrated lower preoperative and 1-month postoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (P &lt; .001; P &lt; .001, respectively). The rate of 30-day reoperation was significantly higher in the C3-4 group (9.5%) compared with the non–C3-4 group (2.2%) (P = .014). In addition, C3-4 surgical level (odds ratio = 4.99, P = .034) and ligament flavum hypertrophy (odds ratio = 5.84, P = .018) were identified as independent risk factors of 30-day reoperation after ACDF. CONCLUSION: Surgery on C3-4 level showed a higher risk of 30-day reoperation than other levels. It is likely due to C3-4 surgical level, and ligament flavum hypertrophy contributes to cord compression, particularly in the unstable early postoperative period.