Cases Of Reinfection Research Articles

An evidence and reasoning based differential diagnosis of a case of leprosy reinfection from reaction and relapse

Leprosy is caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) and is unique in terms of the chronicity of the disease and its prolonged treatment protocol. Even after the introduction of multidrug therapy (MDT) by World health organization (WHO), large numbers of new cases (nearly 200,000) of leprosy are reported yearly, indicating active transmission, especially in developing countries. Recurrent clinical manifestations after MDT can occur due to leprosy reactions, relapse or reinfection. It is very difficult to differentiate reaction, relapse and reinfection. Here we categorized a recent case of reoccurrence of leprosy as reinfection by differentiating it from reaction and relapse based on evidence and by analysing the clinical data of the patient.

SARS-CoV-2 reinfection across a spectrum of immunological states.

PurposeSeveral cases of symptomatic reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) after full recovery from a prior episode have been reported. As reinfection has become an increasingly common phenomenon, an improved understanding of the risk factors for reinfection and the character and duration of the serological responses to infection and vaccination is critical for managing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic.MethodsWe described four cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection in individuals representing a spectrum of healthy and immunocompromised states, including (1) a healthy 41‐year‐old pediatrician, (2) an immunocompromised 31‐year‐old with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, (3) a healthy 26‐year‐old pregnant woman, and (4) a 50‐year‐old with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. We performed confirmatory quantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction and qualitative immunoglobulin M and quantitative IgG testing on all available patient samples to confirm the presence of infection and serological response to infection.ResultsOur analysis showed that patients 1 and 2, a healthy and an immunocompromised patient, both failed to mount a robust serologic response to the initial infection. In contrast, patients 3 and 4, with minimal comorbid disease, both mounted a strong serological response to their initial infection, but were still susceptible to reinfection.ConclusionRepeat episodes of COVID‐19 are capable of occurring in patients regardless of the presence of known risk factors for infection or level of serological response to infection, although this did not trigger critical illness in any instance.

Symptomatic reinfection with COVID-19: A case-report study in Iran

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resulted in a worldwide concern. The role of the immunity system and memory cells in this disease and their ability in preventing a secondary infection is a controversial issue. Here we presented a case of reinfection with this virus eight months after the first episode. A twenty-one-year-old man was referred to our local hospital on 19 February 2020 with symptoms of viral infection. COVID-19 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR. He got hospitalized for 5 days. Eight months later on 4 October 2020, he was again referred with symptoms of viral infection and para-clinical tests confirmed COVID-19 infection. He got hospitalized for 6 days in the second episode. Although the immunity system plays important role in COVID-19 infection through the presence of memory cells it doesn’t guarantee permanent immunity to this virus. Reinfection with COVID-19 is possible and has been reported in some other studies.

SARS CoV-2 reinfection rate is higher in the Omicron variant than in the Alpha and Delta variants.

Background and objectivesMany mutations in variants for instance Delta and Alpha are associated with immune evasion and higher infectious potential. There are uncertainties regarding Omicron. In this regard, we aimed to compare the frequency of reinfection of SARS CoV-2 variants in our hospital between April 22, 2021 and January 26, 2022.MethodThe reinfection rates and demographic characteristics of a total of 27,487 COVID-19 patients infected with different SARS CoV-2 variants were examined.ResultsReinfection was found in 26 (0.46%) of 5554 Alpha, 209 (1.16%) of 17,941 Delta, and 520 (13.0%) of 3992 Omicron variants. A statistically significant difference was observed between the reinfection rates of the variants (p = 0.000). The mean reinfection days were calculated as 204.4 ± 51.1 in the Alpha variant, 291.2 ± 58.2 in the Delta variant, and 361.2 ± 131.6 in the Omicron variant (p = 0.000). It was observed that 16.5% of reinfection cases caught COVID-19 for the second time 3–6 months after the first COVID-19 infection, 36.7% after 6–12 months, and 46.8% after more than 12 months. There was a significant difference between the times in reinfection cases. Most reinfections occurred more than 12 months apart. Among those with a reinfection time > 12 months, 0% had Alpha, 3.4% had Delta, and 96.6% had Omicron variants.ConclusionThe highest reinfection rate was observed in the Omicron variant. Reinfection was approximately 30 times more frequent in the Omicron variant than in the Alpha variant and 10 times more frequent in the Delta variant.

Characteristics of 24 SARS-CoV-2-Sequenced Reinfection Cases in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain.

BackgroundSince the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the main concern is whether reinfections are possible, and which are the associated risk factors. This study aims to describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of 24 sequence-confirmed reinfection SARS-CoV-2 cases over 1 year in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain).MethodsPatients with > 45 days between two positive PCR tests regardless of symptoms and negative tests between episodes were initially considered as suspected reinfection cases from November 2020 to May 2021. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to confirm genetic differences between consensus sequences and for phylogenetic studies based on PANGOLIN nomenclature. Reinfections were confirmed by the number of mutations, change in lineage, or epidemiological criteria.ResultsFrom 39 reported suspected reinfection cases, complete viral genomes could be sequenced from both episodes of 24 patients, all were confirmed as true reinfections. With a median age of 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32–65), 66% were women and 58% were healthcare workers (HCWs). The median days between episodes were 122 (IQR 72–199), occurring one-third within 3 months. Reinfection episodes were frequently asymptomatic and less severe than primary infections. The absence of seroconversion was associated with symptomatic reinfections. Only one case was reinfected with a variant of concern (VOC).ConclusionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reinfections can occur in a shorter time than previously reported and are mainly found in immunocompetent patients. Surveillance through WGS is useful to identify viral mutations associated with immune evasion.

Epidemiological Characteristics of Cases of COVID-19 Reinfection in Rivers State, Nigeria

Background: The immune system’s antibodies have been trained to deal with similar-looking pathogens through prior infection or vaccination. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the protection level of convalescents’ antibodies against reinfections remains unclear. However, immunological solid evidence of antibodies protection against severity exists. Antibody levels are said to serve as a realistic stand-in for immune protection. How long these convalescent antibodies last in the body are still subject to research. Some findings document three months to eight months after infection to SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to investigate the cases of COVID-19 reinfection in individuals who had recovered from an initial COVID-19 infection.
 Methods: A case series of individuals with a second positive COVID-19 PCR test result in Rivers State between March 2020 to June 2021.
 Results: Five cases were retested positive for COVID-19 with a median age of 46 (36-49) years, four males and a female. Four of the cases were found to have comorbidities of diabetes, hypertension, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The median interval between the two episodes was 96 (37-196) days. Except for one asymptomatic case in the second episode, the convalescent participants had symptoms of COVID-19 in both the first and second episodes.
 Conclusion: This study is illustrative of the possibility of COVID-19 reinfection. The longevity of circulating antibodies and the existence of other chronic disease conditions like HIV and diabetes in the individual may be related to this outcome. While further studies are recommended, full vaccination of all eligible persons, including COVID-19 convalescent persons with comorbidities is advised. Continued adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions will enhance the chances of safety in the pandemic.

The REinfection in COVID-19 Estimation of Risk (RECOVER) study: Reinfection and serology dynamics in a cohort of Canadian healthcare workers.

BackgroundUnderstanding the immune response to natural infection by SARS‐CoV‐2 is key to pandemic management, especially in the current context of emerging variants. Uncertainty remains regarding the efficacy and duration of natural immunity against reinfection.MethodsWe conducted an observational prospective cohort study in Canadian healthcare workers (HCWs) with a history of PCR‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to (i) measure the average incidence rate of reinfection and (ii) describe the serological immune response to the primary infection.ResultsOur cohort comprised 569 HCWs; median duration of individual follow‐up was 371 days. We detected six cases of reinfection in absence of vaccination between August 21, 2020, and March 1, 2022, for a reinfection incidence rate of 4.0 per 100 person‐years. Median duration of seropositivity was 415 days in symptomatics at primary infection compared with 213 days in asymptomatics (p < 0.0001). Other characteristics associated with prolonged seropositivity for IgG against the spike protein included age over 55 years, obesity, and non‐Caucasian ethnicity.ConclusionsAmong unvaccinated healthcare workers, reinfection with SARS‐CoV‐2 following a primary infection remained rare.

PO-621-07 OUTCOMES OF CLORHEXIDINE SCRUBBING WITHOUT CAPSULECTOMY VS. COMPLETE CAPSULECTOMY AFTER LEAD EXTRACTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE DEVICE INFECTION

Complete capsulectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of reinfection in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection after transvenous lead extraction (TLE). However, it is time consuming and requires extensive tissue debridement with a potentially higher risk of hematoma formation. To compare the outcomes of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and saline pocket irrigation without capsulectomy vs. capsulectomy after TLE in CIED-related infection. Consecutive patients who underwent TLE for CIED-related infection were included. In the no-capsulectomy group, after complete device removal thorough scrubbing of the generator pocket with 20 cc of 2% CHG followed by irrigation with 1000 cc of saline was undertaken. The pocket was dried, and the wound was closed with separate intradermal absorbable suture. In patients undergoing capsulectomy, extensive tissue debridement aiming for complete removal of the capsule was undertaken. Patients were evaluated 6 weeks after the procedure and every 6 months thereafter. The primary safety outcome was hematoma formation; primary efficacy outcome was reinfection. Secondary outcomes included any adverse reaction to chlorhexidine, need for reintervention, and infection related mortality. A total of 94 patients were included between July 2013 and September 2020 (mean age 67.4±13.1 years; 32 female), out of which 39 patients underwent CHG pocket irrigation and 55 underwent capsulectomy after CIED extraction. Mean follow-up was 673 days. Six patients presented hematomas in the capsulectomy group vs. 0 in the CHG group (9.2%vs 0%, p=0.04). One patient in the CHG group and 3 patients in the capsulectomy group (2.6% vs 5.4%, p=0.49) died of worsening sepsis despite device extraction. There were no cases of reinfection, even though 50 patients (53.2%) had a new device. In patients with CIED infection, the use of CHG without capsulectomy resulted in a lower risk of hematoma formation than standard pocket management with capsulectomy, without increasing the risk of reinfection or any adverse effects associated with chlorhexidine use.

COVID-19 Reinfection or Relapse: Case Series

One-time reinfection with SARS-Cov-2 does not warranty of immunity against reinfection due to various possible reasons for this like waning immunity or high viral load or an immunocompromised state. Cases of reinfection have been reported from many countries in the world, here in this case series we are sharing the experience of three cases of reinfection from India. Two of them were old with multiple comorbidities and one is a young patient with no comorbidity. All three-patient got reinfected less than two months.

Large Scale SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing and Genomic Surveillance Reveal Prolonged Infections, Protracted RNA shedding, and Viral Reinfections.

Large-scale SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing coupled with whole genome sequencing in the diagnostic laboratories is instrumental for real-time genomic surveillance. The extensive genomic, laboratory, and clinical data provide a valuable resource for understanding cases of reinfection versus prolonged RNA shedding and protracted infections. In this study, data from a total of 22,292 clinical specimens, positive by SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis at Johns Hopkins clinical virology laboratory between March 11th 2020 to September 23rd 2021, were used to identify patients with two or more positive results. A total of 3,650 samples collected from 1,529 patients who had between 2 and 20 positive results were identified in a time frame that extended up to 403 days from the first positive. Cycle threshold values (Ct) were available for 1,622 samples, the median of which was over 30 by 11 days after the first positive. Extended recovery of infectious virus on cell culture was notable for up to 70 days after the first positive in immunocompromised patients. Whole genome sequencing data generated as a part of our SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance was available for 1,027 samples from patients that had multiple positive tests. Positive samples collected more than 10 days after initial positive with high quality sequences (coverage >90% and mean depth >100), were more likely to be from unvaccinated, or immunosuppressed patients. Reinfections with viral variants of concern were found in 3 patients more than 130 days from prior infections with a different viral clade. In 75 patients that had 2 or more high quality sequences, the acquisition of more substitutions or deletions was associated with lack of vaccination and longer time between the recovered viruses. Our study highlights the value of integrating genomic, laboratory, and clinical data for understanding the biology of SARS-CoV-2 as well as for setting a precedent for future epidemics and pandemics.

Clinical manifestations, treatment options, and comorbidities in COVID-19 relapse patients: A systematic review.

IntroductionInterest revolving around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) reinfection is escalating rapidly. By definition, reinfection denotes severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), PCR redetection, and COVID‐19 recurrence within three months of the initial symptoms. The main aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate the features of COVID‐19 relapse patients.Materials and methodsFor this study, we used a string of terms developed by a skilled librarian and through a systematical search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for eligible studies. Clinical surveys of any type were included from January 2019 to March 2021. Eligible studies consisted of two positive assessments separated by a negative result via RT‐PCR.ResultsFifty‐four studies included 207 cases of COVID‐19 reinfection. Children were less likely to have COVID‐19 relapse. However, the most patients were in the age group of 20–40 years. Asthenia (66.6%), headache (66.6%), and cough (54.7%) were prevalent symptoms in the first SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Asthenia (62.9%), myalgia (62.9%), and headache (61.1%) were most frequent in the second one. The most common treatment options used in first COVID‐19 infection were lopinavir/ritonavir (80%), oxygen support (69.2%), and oseltamivir (66.6). However, for the treatment of second infection, mostly antibiotics (100%), dexamethasone (100%), and remdesivir (80%) were used. In addition, obesity (32.5%), kidney failure (30.7%), and hypertension (30.1%) were the most common comorbidities. Unfortunately, approximately 4.5% of patients died.ConclusionWe found the potency of COVID‐19 recurrence as an outstanding issue. This feature should be regarded in the COVID‐19 management. Furthermore, the first and second COVID‐19 are similar in clinical features. For clinically practical comparison of the symptoms severity between two epochs of infection, uniform data of both are required. We suggest that future studies undertake a homogenous approach to establish the clinical patterns of the reinfection phenomena.

Hepatitis C Virus Reinfection Following Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in the Prison Setting: The SToP-C Study.

Injection drug use (IDU) following treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may lead to reinfection, particularly if access to harm reduction services is suboptimal. This study assessed HCV reinfection risk following direct-acting antiviral therapy within Australian prisons that had opioid agonist therapy (OAT) programs but did not have needle and syringe programs (NSPs). The Surveillance and Treatment of Prisoners With Hepatitis C (SToP-C) study enrolled people incarcerated in 4 prisons between 2014 and 2019. Participants treated for HCV were followed every 3-6 months to identify reinfection (confirmed by sequencing). Reinfection incidence and associated factors were evaluated. Among 388 participants receiving treatment, 161 had available posttreatment follow-up and were included in analysis (92% male; median age, 33 years; 67% IDU in prison; median follow-up 9 months). Among those with recent (in the past month) IDU (n = 71), 90% had receptive needle/syringe sharing. During 145 person-years (PY) of follow-up, 18 cases of reinfection were identified. Reinfection incidence was 12.5/100 PY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-19.8) overall, increasing to 28.7/100 PY (95% CI: 16.3-50.6) among those with recent IDU and needle/syringe sharing. In adjusted analysis, recent IDU with needle/syringe sharing was associated with increased reinfection risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.74 [95% CI: 1.33-16.80]; P = .016) and longer HCV testing interval with decreased risk (ie, chance of detection; aHR, 0.41 per each month increase [95% CI: .26-.64]; P < .001). A high rate of HCV reinfection was observed within prison. Posttreatment surveillance and retreatment are -essential to limit the impact of reinfection. High-coverage OAT and NSPs should be considered within prisons. NCT02064049.

Clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty for septic sequelae in childhood : a retrospective study.

AimsAdult patients with history of childhood infection pose a surgical challenge for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to distorted bony anatomy, soft-tissue contractures, risk of reinfection, and relatively younger age. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine clinical outcome, reinfection rate, and complications in patients with septic sequelae after THA.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 91 cementless THAs (57 male and 34 female) performed between 2008 and 2017 in patients who had history of hip infection during childhood. Clinical outcome was measured using Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Modified Merle d’Aubigne and Postel (MAP) score, and quality of life (QOL) using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12) components: Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS); limb length discrepancy (LLD) and radiological assessment of the prosthesis was performed at the latest follow-up. Reinfection and revision surgery after THA for any reason was documented.ResultsThere was significant improvement in HHS, Modified Merle d’Aubigne Postel hip score, and QOL index SF 12-PCS and MCS (p < 0.001) and there was no case of reinfection reported during the follow-up. The minimum follow-up for the study was three years with a mean of 6.5 (SD 2.3; 3 to 12). LLD decreased from a mean of 3.3 cm (SD 1) to 0.9 cm (SD 0.8) during follow-up. One patient required revision surgery for femoral component loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated revision-free survivorship of 100% at the end of five years and 96.9% (95% confidence interval 79.8 to 99.6) at the end of ten years.ConclusionWe found that cementless THA results in good to excellent functional outcomes in patients with a prior history of childhood infection. There is an exceedingly low rate of risk of reinfection in these patients, even though complications are not uncommon.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):314–320.

Importance of understanding the reinfection risk of COVID-19 in children

Importance of understanding the reinfection risk of COVID-19 in children

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children: a prospective national surveillance study between January, 2020, and July, 2021, in England

BackgroundReinfection after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncommon in adults, but little is known about the risks, characteristics, severity, or outcomes of reinfection in children. We aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in children and compare this with the risk in adults, by analysis of national testing data for England.MethodsIn our prospective, national surveillance study to assess reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in children in England, we used national SARS-CoV-2 testing data to estimate the risk of reinfection at least 90 days after primary infection from Jan 27, 2020, to July, 31, 2021, which encompassed the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variant waves in England. Data from children up to age 16 years who met the criteria for reinfection were included. Disease severity was assessed by linking reinfection cases to national hospital admission data, intensive care admission, and death registration datasets.FindingsReinfection rates closely followed community infection rates, with a small peak during the alpha wave and a larger peak during the delta wave. In children aged 16 years and younger, 688 418 primary infections and 2343 reinfections were identified. The overall reinfection rate was 66·88 per 100 000 population, which was higher in adults (72·53 per 100 000) than children (21·53 per 100 000). The reinfection rate after primary infection was 0·68% overall, 0·73% in adults compared with 0·18% in children age younger than 5 years, 0·24% in those aged 5–11 years, and 0·49% in those aged 12–16 years. Of the 109 children admitted to hospital with reinfection, 78 (72%) had comorbidities. Hospital admission rates were similar for the first (64 [2·7%] of 2343) and second episode (57 [2·4%] of 2343) and intensive care admissions were rare (seven children for the first episode and four for reinfections). There were 44 deaths within 28 days after primary infection (0·01%) and none after reinfection.InterpretationThe risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is strongly related to exposure due to community infection rates, especially during the delta variant wave. Children had a lower risk of reinfection than did adults, but reinfections were not associated with more severe disease or fatal outcomes.FundingUK Health Security Agency.

COVID-19 reinfection in Liberia: Implication for improving disease surveillance.

COVID-19 remains a serious disruption to human health, social, and economic existence. Reinfection with the virus intensifies fears and raises more questions among countries, with few documented reports. This study investigated cases of COVID-19 reinfection using patients' laboratory test results between March 2020 and July 2021 in Liberia. Data obtained from Liberia's Ministry of Health COVID-19 surveillance was analyzed in Excel 365 and ArcGIS Pro 2.8.2. Results showed that with a median interval of 200 days (Range: 99-415), 13 out of 5,459 cases were identified and characterized as reinfection in three counties during the country's third wave of the outbreak. Eighty-six percent of the COVID-19 reinfection cases occurred in Montserrado County within high clusters, which accounted for over 80% of the randomly distributed cases in Liberia. More cases of reinfection occurred among international travelers within populations with high community transmissions. This study suggests the need for continued public education and surveillance to encourage longer-term COVID-19 preventive practices even after recovery.

Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 Testing among the Unvaccinated Is Punctuated by Intermittent Positivity and Variable Rates of Increasing Cycle Threshold Values.

ABSTRACTThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is complicated by cases of vaccine breakthrough and reinfection and widespread transmission of variants of concern (VOCs). Consequently, the need to interpret longitudinal positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) tests is crucial in guiding clinical decisions regarding infection control precautions and treatment. Although diagnostic real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR tests yield CT values that are inversely correlated with RNA quantity, these tests are only approved for qualitative interpretation. In this study, we performed a retrospective review of 72,217 SARS-CoV-2 positive tests and identified 264 patients with longitudinal positivity prior to vaccination and VOC circulation. Patients with longitudinal positivity fell into two categories: short-term (207, 78%) or prolonged (57, 22%) positivity, defined as ≤28 (range, 1 to 28; median, 16) days and >28 (range, 29 to 152; median, 41) days, respectively. In general, CT values increased over time in both groups; however, 11 short-term-positive patients had greater amounts of RNA detected at their terminal test than at the first positive test, and 6 patients had RNA detected at CT values of <35 at least 40 days after initial infection. Oscillating positive and negative results occurred in both groups, although oscillation was seen three times more frequently in prolonged-positive patients. Patients with prolonged positivity had diverse clinical characteristics but were often critically ill and were discharged to high-level care or deceased (22%). Overall, this study demonstrates that caution must be emphasized when interpreting CT values as a proxy for infectivity, a predictor of severity, or a guide for patient care decisions in the absence of additional clinical context, particularly among the unvaccinated population.IMPORTANCE We describe the duration of positivity and the COVID-19 treatment and outcome characteristics of an unvaccinated population of patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 positivity. This investigation serves to highlight challenges in using CT values to guide clinical decisions among unvaccinated individuals.

Efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin\u2013piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Papua and Sumatra, Indonesia

BackgroundDihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DHA–PPQ) has been adopted as first-line therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Indonesia since 2010. The efficacy of DHA–PPQ was evaluated in 2 sentinel sites in Keerom District, Papua and Merangin District, Jambi, Sumatra from April 2017 to April 2018.MethodsClinical and parasitological parameters were monitored over a 42-day period following the World Health Organization standard in vivo protocol and subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were treated with DHA–PPQ once daily for 3 days, administered orally.ResultsIn Papua, 6339 subjects were screened through active and passive cases detection. Of the 114 falciparum and 81 vivax cases enrolled, 102 falciparum and 80 vivax cases completed the 42 day follow up, and 12 falciparum and 1 vivax cases were either lost to follow up or withdrawn. Kaplan–Meier analysis of microscopy readings of 102 falciparum cases revealed 93.1% (95% CI 86.4–97.2) as Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR). No delay in parasite clearance nor severe adverse reaction was observed. Recurrent parasites of Plasmodium falciparum were detected in 7 cases and categorized as late treatment failures (LTF) at days 21, 35, and 42 and one of which was reinfected by Plasmodium vivax at day 42. Two cases were confirmed as recrudescent infection and 4 were re-infection. The PCR-corrected DHA–PPQ efficacy for P. falciparum was 97.9% (95% CI 92.7–99.7). Of the 80 cases of P. vivax that were followed up, 71 cases were completely cured and classified as ACPR (88.8%, 95% CI 79.7–94.7) and 9 cases showed recurrent infection at days 35 and 42, and classified as LTF. In Sumatra, of the 751 subjects screened, 35 vivax subjects enrolled, 34 completed the 42 day follow up. Thirty-three cases were completely cured and classified as ACPR (97.1%, 95% CI 84.7–99.9) and 1 recurrent infection was observed and classified as LTF. No delay in parasite clearance nor severe adverse reaction was observed. Analysis of the Pfk13 gene in P. falciparum cases from Papua revealed no mutations associated with artemisinin resistance in the 20 SNPs previously reported. Analysis of the Pfpm2 gene at day 0 and day of recurrence in recrudescent cases revealed the same single copy number, whereas 3 of the 4 re-infection cases carried 2–3 Pfpm2 gene copy numbers.ConclusionTreatment of falciparum and vivax malaria cases with DHA–PPQ showed a high efficacy and safety.

Confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfections After a Second Wave With Predominance of Lambda in Lima and Callao, Peru.

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is a major public health problem in the world and reinfections are becoming more frequent. Our main objective was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and genomic characteristics of the confirmed cases of reinfection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the capital of Lima and Callao, Peru.MethodsWe searched in the Peruvian laboratory information system from April 2020 up to May 2021, looking for cases having 2 positive molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 with more than 90 days between them. We performed genomic sequencing to the available pairs of samples and described the clinical characteristics, epidemiological impact, and genomic analysis of the confirmed reinfections.ResultsThere were 1 694 164 people with a positive diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 in Lima/Callao during the study period. Of these, 1695 had 2 positive molecular tests with more than 90 days between them. Two hundred eleven had both samples available for genomic analysis according to our selection criteria, and these were retrieved and submitted to sequencing. Thirty cases were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 reinfections with 2 different lineages in the 2 episodes. The variant Lambda (C.37) was the most common during the second infection and accounted for 19 (63.3%) of the 30 cases.ConclusionsWe report 30 cases of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. The Lambda variant was the most common cause of the second infections, in concordance with its predominant circulation during Peru’s second wave. This report describes the largest series of confirmed reinfections by SARS-CoV-2 in Latin America.We describe the epidemiological, clinical, and genomic characteristics of the confirmed cases of reinfection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Lima and Callao, durante la segunda ola en Peru. The Lambda variant (C.37) was the most common cause of the second infections.

Post covid syndrome and rheumatic diseases: focus on rheumatoid arthritis (own data)

Introduction. In modern reality postcovid syndrome (PCS) is characterized by clinical heterogeneity and multi-organ involvement, often presenting a differential diagnostic and therapeutic problem. However, in most studies of PCS, stratification of patients taking into account individual comorbid conditions was not performed. Thus, only an extremely small number of studies have been devoted to assessing the course of PCS in rheumatic diseasesPurpose. To characterize the features of the course of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, as well as to conduct a comparative assessment of clinical and demographic parameters in groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, differentiated by the presence of PCS.Materials and methods. The material of the questionnaire which contained questions regarding socio-demographic data of respondents, information on rheumatological history, comorbid diseases, data on past COVID-19, including cases of re-infection, and PCS.Results.The study included 32 adult patients (29 women, 90%) with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Of the 32 patients who underwent COVID-19, in 23 cases it was possible to form a judgment about the presence or absence of PCS. To study PCS, 23 patients were stratified into two groups: 11 (47.8%) patients developed PCS (Group 1) and 12 patients had COVID-19 without consequences (Group 2). Both groups were represented predominantly by women (90.9% and 91.7%, respectively). In the general group 37.5% of patients with COVID-19 required inpatient treatment. The number of symptoms associated with COVID-19 did not correlate with RA activity, however, patients with higher RA activity were more likely to report increased arthralgia as a symptom of COVID-19. 47.8% of COVID-19 survivors experienced PCS. The average age, the number of comorbid diseases and the severity of RA symptoms at the time of COVID-19 were relatively higher in the group of patients with RA and PKS. Patients with PKS also noted a higher frequency of hospitalizations and a more severe course of COVID-19.Conclusions.A quantitative assessment of the risk of developing PKS is needed, which will serve as a basis for developing a strategy aimed at prevention, timely diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome in patients with RS. To this end, further studies on larger cohorts of patients are required.