Rates Of Serious Infections Research Articles

High Rates of Serious Infections in Childhood IBD

High Rates of Serious Infections in Childhood IBD

Comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab, mycophenolate, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methotrexate (MTX), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) with azathioprine (AZA) for maintenance treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of rituximab, MMF, MTX, CYC, and AZA for maintenance therapy in AAV patients. We applied a random-effects, meta-analytic model in all calculations. We performed a Bayesian fixed-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from RCTs. The primary effectiveness outcome was the number of patients who experienced relapse during the maintenance phase, while the primary safety outcome was the number of serious infections. Five RCTs including 667 patients were included. Rituximab demonstrated lower relapse rates than MMF (odds ratio (OR), 0.16; credible interval (CrI), 0.07-0.38). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA)-based likelihood rating revealed that rituximab had the probability of being the best relapse-lowering therapy, followed by CYC, MTX, AZA, and MMF. In SUCRA-based likelihood rating, rituximab showed the greatest probability of being the best major relapse-based therapy, followed by CYC, AZA, and MMF. MMF showed a lower risk of serious infection than MTX did (OR, 0.04, 95% CrI, 0.00-0.53). SUCRA-based rating probability revealed MMF was likely the safest treatment with the lowest incidence of serious infection, followed by CYC, AZA, rituximab, and MTX, although the difference was only significant between MMF and MTX. Rituximab may be an effective relapse-lowering, maintenance treatment for patients with AAV, and MMF showed the lowest rate of serious infections among the drugs investigated.

Understanding Public Perceptions Regarding Cochlear Implant Surgery in Adults.

Approximately 6% of adults eligible for cochlear implantation (CI) undergo surgery. This study aims to understand how general perceptions about CI contribute to barriers causing this low utilization rate. Participants completed an online survey regarding their perceptions about cochlear implantation. They were asked to rank CIQOL-10 Global priorities and corresponding risk tolerance for minor complications (changes in taste, vertigo) and major complications (infections requiring hospitalization, meningitis, reimplantation, facial paralysis, and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leak). A total of 615 responses (female 55%, mean age 39 years [range 20-78]) were included. Respondents identified issues with insurance (46%) and fear of undergoing surgery (21%) as barriers preventing eligible adults from receiving CI. Regarding surgical risk, respondents significantly underestimated rates of minor complications (p < 0.0001) and almost all major complications (all p < 0.0001) while overestimating rates of serious infections and need for reimplantation (both p < 0.005). The ability to hear strangers in noisy environments was identified as the highest priority for CI (26%). Individuals who knew someone with a cochlear implantation were willing to tolerate higher rates of all minor and major complications (all p < 0.05). Healthcare workers were similarly willing to tolerate significantly higher rates of meningitis, facial paralysis, and CSF leak to achieve their highest priority (all p < 0.05). Respondents identify insurance coverage and fear of surgery as primary reasons for low utilization of adult CI in the United States. However, healthcare workers or those who knew someone with a cochlear implantation indicated significantly higher rates of risk tolerance to achieve their highest quality of life priorities, indicating the potential that the benefits of cochlear implantation are underappreciated in the general population.

Infectious complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ malignancies.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are targeted cancer therapies regarded to have less toxicity than chemotherapy. Immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs are well described in the literature but limited data exist on their infectious complications. The objective is to describe the spectrum and risk factors for developing serious infections in patients receiving ICIs.MethodsRetrospective review of patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or nonsmall‐cell lung cancer on nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and/or ipilimumab from January 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017. Exclusion: receipt of less than two ICI doses or history of other malignancy. Characteristics: age, sex, prior chemotherapy, steroid use, and temozolomide or infliximab use. Data identified from microbiology, radiography, serology, or physician note documentation. Serious infection is defined as infections requiring hospitalization and/or IV antibiotics from initiation of ICI until the end of the study period.ResultsOne hundred and eleven pts received ICIs. Suspected or confirmed bacterial infections occurred in 24% (27/111) with 8% (9/111) confirmed bacterial cultures. The overall serious infection rate was 14% (16/111) with 25% (4/16) confirmed bacterial cultures. Suspected or confirmed infection sites: genitourinary 20% (22/111), pneumonia 5% (7/111), skin/soft tissue 7% (8/111). Noninfectious pneumonitis (NIP) occurred in 5% (5/111). No association regarding the risk of infection between the type of malignancy and ICI used. Steroid use was the only risk factor significantly associated with serious infection: 12/16 (75%) on steroids versus 27/95 (28.4%) without steroid use (p = 0.0003).ConclusionThe rate of serious infection with ICI was higher in our study compared with previous reports of pts treated with melanoma. Infectious complications are encountered with ICIs and correlate with steroid use.

Positioning Infliximab and Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Positioning Infliximab and Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

The risk factors and incidence of major infectious diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the risk factor and incidence of infections in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy for ankylosing spondylitis using data from the national health insurance service. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding patients with ankylosing spondylitis prescribed TNFis were obtained from an insurance claims database of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in Korea. Outcomes used were incidence rates of serious infection, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and herpes zoster during the follow-up period as well as the relationship between each TNFi and sex, hazard ratio (HR) of infection-related risk factors, and incidence of infections. Results A total of 2515 patients were included. There were no significant differences among the hazard ratios of TNFis for serious infection, pneumonia, and herpes zoster. However, the hazard ratio of tuberculosis was significantly higher for infliximab than for etanercept (adjusted HR 8.40 [95% confidence interval: 1.06–66.91]). In the subgroup analysis by sex, women treated with golimumab had a significantly higher hazard of herpes zoster than those treated with etanercept (adjusted HR 12.40 [95% confidence interval: 1.40–109.58]). Conclusion We recommend that risk factors for these infectious diseases be identified prior to prescribing TNFis in these patients.

Trends in Hospitalizations for Serious Infections Among People With Opioid Use Disorder in Ontario, Canada.

ObjectivesOpioid use among people who inject drugs can lead to serious complications, including infections. We sought to study trends in rates of these complications among people with an opioid use disorder (OUD) and the sequelae of those hospitalizations.MethodsWe analyzed all inpatient hospitalizations for serious infections (infective endocarditis [IE], spinal infections, nonvertebral bone infections, and skin or soft tissue infections) among people with OUD in Ontario between 2013 and 2019. We reported the population adjusted rate of hospitalizations for serious infections annually, stratified by type of infection and prevalence of prior opioid agonist therapy and hydromorphone prescribing. We reported characteristics of hospitalizations and 30–day mortality in the most recent 2 years.ResultsAmong people with OUD there was a 167% increase in rates of IE (7.7-20.6 per million residents; P < 0.01), a 394% increase in rates of spinal infections (3.4–16.8 per million residents; P < 0.01), a 191% increase in rates of nonvertebral bone infections (8.9 to 25.9 per million residents; P < 0.01), and a 147% increase in infections of the skin or soft tissue (32.1–79.4 per million residents; P < 0.01) over 7 years in Ontario. Death in-hospital and within 30 days of discharge was highest among those with IE (11.5% and 15.9%, respectively), and lower among those with other infections (<5%).ConclusionsRates of serious infections among people with OUD are rising, placing a significant burden on patients. These findings suggest that early intervention and treatment of infections in this population are needed to prevent downstream harm.

S771 Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib as Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase 3 U-ACCOMPLISH Study

Introduction: U-ACCOMPLISH is one of two phase 3 induction trials evaluating safety and efficacy of upadacitinib-45 mg once daily (UPA) in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: U-ACCOMPLISH, a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03653026), enrolled patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe UC (defined as adapted Mayo score 5-9 with centrally read endoscopic score of 2-3) who had inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids and/or biologics. Pts were randomized 2:1 to UPA or placebo (PBO) for 8 weeks (wks). At wk 8, responders entered the maintenance phase and non-responders entered the extended treatment period to receive open-label UPA for additional 8 wks. Primary endpoint (clinical remission per adapted Mayo Score) and ranked secondary endpoints including symptomatic, endoscopic-histologic evaluations from 8-wk PBO-controlled period are reported here. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported. Results: 522 pts were randomized (UPA, n = 345;PBO, n = 177);intent-to-treat population included 341 pts in UPA and 174 pts in PBO group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups;50.7% and 51.1% were biologic inadequate responders in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of pts receiving UPA (33.5%) versus PBO (4.1%) achieved primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference: 29.0% [23.2, 34.7];P<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of pts receiving UPA versus PBO also achieved all ranked secondary endpoints (all P<0.001;Figure 1).Serious adverse events were reported by 3.2% and 4.5% of pts in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 1). Similar rates of serious infection were observed in both groups (0.6%);2 events each of herpes zoster and opportunistic infection were reported in UPA group. No active tuberculosis, malignancy, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, or deaths were reported. One pt with venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and 1 pt with gastrointestinal perforation were reported in the placebo group. Conclusion: UPA 45 mg QD induction treatment led to statistically significant improvements in clinical, endoscopic, and combined endoscopic-histologic endpoints. Treatment was well tolerated, and safety profile and AE prevalence were comparable with previous studies of UPA with no new safety signals identified.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 3-year follow-up of a postmarketing surveillance.

To analyse the long-term safety and effectiveness of abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis using real-world, Japanese, postmarketing surveillance data, focusing on serious infections and malignancies as priority events. This 3-year, multicentre surveillance registered patients undergoing abatacept treatment by intravenous infusion between July 2011 and October 2012. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 647 and 596 patients, respectively. The total observation period for the safety analysis was 1280 patient-years. Over the 3-year follow-up, the incidence rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs were 19.92 per 100 patient-years (22.87% of patients) and 4.06 per 100 patient-years (6.65% of patients), respectively. Infections and infestations were the most common ADRs (14.68%), followed by respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (3.09%). Incidence rates of serious infections as ADRs and malignancy as adverse events were 1.95 and 1.02 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Retention rates at 1 and 3 years were 67.4% and 43.9%, respectively. Significant decreases from baseline were observed in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and DAS28-C-reactive protein, as well as Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and modified HAQ scores. No new safety signals were detected during the 3-year observation period and effectiveness was maintained over time.

Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and ObjectivesTo report safety of ocrelizumab (OCR) up to 7 years in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) enrolled in clinical trials or treated in real-world postmarketing settings.MethodsSafety analyses are based on integrated clinical and laboratory data for all patients who received OCR in 11 clinical trials, including the controlled treatment and open-label extension (OLE) periods of the phase 2 and 3 trials, plus the phase 3b trials VELOCE, CHORDS, CASTING, OBOE, ENSEMBLE, CONSONANCE, and LIBERTO. For selected adverse events (AEs), additional postmarketing data were used. Incidence rates of serious infections (SIs) and malignancies were contextualized using multiple epidemiologic sources.ResultsAt data cutoff (January 2020), 5,680 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) received OCR (18,218 patient-years [PY] of exposure) in clinical trials. Rates per 100 PY (95% confidence interval) of AEs (248; 246–251), serious AEs (7.3; 7.0–7.7), infusion-related reactions (25.9; 25.1–26.6), and infections (76.2; 74.9–77.4) were similar to those within the controlled treatment period of the phase 3 trials. Rates of the most common serious AEs, including SIs (2.01; 1.81–2.23) and malignancies (0.46; 0.37–0.57), were consistent with the ranges reported in epidemiologic data.DiscussionContinuous administration of OCR for up to 7 years in clinical trials, as well as its broader use for more than 3 years in the real-world setting, are associated with a favorable and manageable safety profile, without emerging safety concerns, in a heterogeneous MS population.Classification of EvidenceThis analysis provides Class III evidence that long-term, continuous treatment with OCR has a consistent and favorable safety profile in patients with RMS and PPMS. This study is rated Class III because of the use of OLE data and historical controls.

Infection hospitalisation in systemic lupus in Sweden

ObjectiveImmune dysregulation in SLE and the corresponding immune-modulating and immunosuppressive nature of the treatments may play key roles in infection risk. We compared serious infection rates among individuals with incident...

Incidence and associated risk factors for invasive fungal infections and other serious infections in patients on ibrutinib

BackgroundIbrutinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of B cells and other immune effectors and is used in a variety of hematologic malignancies. There have been numerous reports of increased frequency of serious infections including invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients on ibrutinib. MethodsDemographic and clinical features of all patients receiving ibrutinib at a single tertiary care center were collected from electronic medical records. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to find out the factors associated with infection. ResultsA total of 244 patients received ibrutinib for hematologic malignancies, of which 44 (18.0%) experienced ≥ 1 serious infection including 5 (2.0%) with IFI (1 pulmonary cryptococcosis, 4 pulmonary aspergillosis), 39 (16.0%) with bacterial infections and 8 (3.3%) with viral infections. Ten patients (4.1%) experienced multiple infections or co-infections while on ibrutinib and 10 (4.1%) expired or were transferred to hospice as a result of infection. In multivariate analysis risk factors that were less common in uninfected versus infected patients included advanced age (73 years vs. 77 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Grade (ECOG) performance score ≥ 2 (6.5% vs. 31.8%) and concurrent use of steroids (4.5% vs. 20.5%) or other cytotoxic agents (0% vs. 4.6%). ConclusionsThere was a high rate of serious infection but relatively few IFI in patients receiving ibrutinib. Most patients who developed serious infections while on ibrutinib had additional predisposing risk factors including concurrent use of steroids or other cytotoxic agents, advanced age and frailty.

Adult-onset inflammatory bowel disease and rate of serious infections compared to the general population: a nationwide register-based cohort study 2002–2017

Objectives To investigate absolute and relative risk of serious infections in adult/elderly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosed 2002–2017. Methods Nationwide, register-based cohort study of Swedish patients with IBD compared with general population matched reference individuals with regard to time to first serious infection, equal to hospital admission. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for any serious infection. Secondary outcomes included site-specific infections, opportunistic infections and sepsis. Results We identified 47 798 individuals with IBD. During a follow-up of 329 000 person-years, they had 8752 first serious infections (26.6 per 1000 person-years). This compared with an incidence rate of 10.7 per 1000 person-years in matched reference individuals, corresponding to a 2.53-fold increased hazard of serious infections (95%CI = 2.47–2.59). The HR for serious infection in elderly-onset IBD was 2.01 (95%CI = 1.95–2.08). The relative hazard of serious infection was somewhat higher in Crohn’s disease (2.94; 95%CI = 2.81–3.06) than in ulcerative colitis (2.24; 95%CI = 2.17–2.31). The HR for serious infections was high in the first year of follow-up (5.17; 95%CI = 4.93–5.42). Individuals with IBD were at a particularly high relative hazard of gastrointestinal and opportunistic infections. The HR for sepsis was 2.47 (95%CI = 2.32–2.63). The relative rates for serious infections in IBD increased in recent years. Conclusions Patients with adult-onset IBD are at increased risk of serious infections, particularly gastrointestinal and opportunistic infections. Relative rates were highest just after IBD diagnosis, and seem to have increased in recent years.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease with an unmet need for treatments that provide rapid and high levels of skin clearance and itch improvement. To assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib vs dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Heads Up was a 24-week, head-to-head, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib with dupilumab among 692 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy. The study was conducted from February 21, 2019, to December 9, 2020, at 129 centers located in 22 countries across Europe, North and South America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population. Patients were randomized 1:1 and treated with oral upadacitinib, 30 mg once daily, or subcutaneous dupilumab, 300 mg every other week. The primary end point was achievement of 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16. Secondary end points were percentage change from baseline in the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (weekly average), proportion of patients achieving EASI100 and EASI90 at week 16, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at week 4, proportion of patients achieving EASI75 at week 2, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) at week 1, and Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) improvement of 4 points or more at week 16. End points at week 24 included EASI75, EASI90, EASI100, and improvement of 4 points or more in Worst Pruritus NRS from baseline (weekly average). Safety was assessed as treatment-emergent adverse events in all patients receiving 1 or more dose of either drug. Of 924 patients screened, 348 (183 men [52.6%]; mean [SD] age, 36.6 [14.6] years) were randomized to receive upadacitinib and 344 were randomized to receive dupilumab (194 men [56.4%]; mean [SD] age, 36.9 [14.1] years); demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among treatment groups. At week 16, 247 patients receiving upadacitinib (71.0%) and 210 patients receiving dupilumab (61.1%) achieved EASI75 (P = .006). All ranked secondary end points also demonstrated the superiority of upadacitinib vs dupilumab, including improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS as early as week 1 (mean [SE], 31.4% [1.7%] vs 8.8% [1.8%]; P < .001), achievement of EASI75 as early as week 2 (152 [43.7%] vs 60 [17.4%]; P < .001), and achievement of EASI100 at week 16 (97 [27.9%] vs 26 [7.6%]; P < .001). Rates of serious infection, eczema herpeticum, herpes zoster, and laboratory-related adverse events were higher for patients who received upadacitinib, whereas rates of conjunctivitis and injection-site reactions were higher for patients who received dupilumab. During 16 weeks of treatment, upadacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy vs dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, with no new safety signals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03738397.

Long-Term Safety of Rituximab (Risks of Viral and Opportunistic Infections)

Purpose of ReviewWe reviewed the current data on infections associated with rituximab use published over the last 5 years.Recent FindingsNew literature was available on rates of serious infections, Hepatitis B reactivation and screening, and infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.SummaryRates of infection varied by study and population, however, higher risk of infection in patients with underlying rheumatologic diseases was seen in those who required a therapy switch, had a smoking history, and those undergoing retreatment who had a serious infection with their first course of therapy. With regards to HBV, the proportion of patients screened continues to be inadequate. Despite the upfront cost, HBV screening and prophylaxis were found to be cost effective. There is still limited data regarding COVID-19 severity in the setting of rituximab, however, rituximab, especially in combination with steroids, may lead to more severe disease and higher mortality.

Giant cell arteritis treatment patterns and rates of serious infections.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) afflicts older adults who may have age- and comorbidity-related risks for infection and is treated with immunosuppressants that increase risk of infection. We examined GCA treatment patterns and rates of serious infections in two real-world cohorts in the U.S. We identified two GCA cohorts using two U.S. health insurance databases, Medicare (public, 2007-2017) and MarketScan (commercial, 2015-2019), by applying a validated claims-based algorithm with positive predictive value 79.0% for GCA. We required age ≥50 years and assessed baseline comorbidities, dispensing of immunosuppressants and prophylactic antibiotics, and vaccine administration. We calculated incidence rates (IR) of serious infections, defined as bacterial or viral infections requiring hospitalisation based on primary inpatient diagnosis code. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios for risk of serious infection for prespecified covariates. The Medicare cohort included 734 patients, 28% male, mean age 77.1; the MarketScan cohort included 1022 patients, 30% male, mean age 68.4. More than 85% used prednisone ≥60mg daily at index date and <10% used tocilizumab. Serious infections developed in 27.9% of Medicare and 7.2% of MarketScan patients: IR per 100 person-years = 10.7 (95% CI 9.3, 12.2) in Medicare and 6.3 (95% CI 5.0, 7.9) in MarketScan. Older age and higher frailty score were significantly associated with increased risk for serious infection. In these two U.S. GCA cohorts, high-dose glucocorticoids were the most common initial treatment, and over 25% of Medicare and 7% of MarketScan patients developed serious infection during follow-up. Older age and higher frailty score were associated with higher risk of serious infections, though maximum daily prednisone dose was not. Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was rare in two GCA cohorts despite infrequent use of prophylactic antibiotics.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab Treatment in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: Results from the Phase 2 Open-Label Extension Study

Background and AimsRisankizumab, an interleukin-23 antibody, demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in a phase 2 study of patients with moderate-to-severe refractory Crohn’s disease. This open-label extension investigated the long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and efficacy of risankizumab in responders to risankizumab in the parent phase 2 study.MethodsEnrolled patients had achieved clinical response [decrease in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index from baseline ≥100] without clinical remission [Crohn’s Disease Activity Index <150] at Week 26, or clinical response and/or remission at Week 52 in the parent phase 2 study and received open-label subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg every 8 weeks.ResultsSixty-five patients were enrolled, including four who had lost response in the parent study and were first reinduced with risankizumab 600 mg every 4 weeks [three infusions]. Patients received risankizumab for a median of 33 months [total: 167.0 patient-years]. The rate of serious adverse events was 24.6 events/100 patient-years; the majority were gastrointestinal in nature. Rates of serious infections, opportunistic infections and fungal infections were 4.2, 1.8, and 6.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. No deaths, malignancies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, latent/active tuberculosis or herpes zoster were reported. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies developed in eight patients [12.3%]; none were neutralizing. Efficacy outcomes were maintained during the study, including the proportions of patients [observed analysis] with clinical remission [>71%] and endoscopic remission [>42%].ConclusionsLong-term maintenance treatment with subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg every 8 weeks was well tolerated by patients with Crohn’s disease, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02513459

Serious Infections in Patients With Gout in the US: ANational Study of Incidence, Time Trends, and Outcomes.

To study the epidemiology of serious infections in patients hospitalized with gout. We identified patients with gout hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, sepsis/bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), or opportunistic infections (OIs) in a US National Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2016 and examined factors associated with utilization and mortality. We noted 1,140,085 hospitalizations of patients with serious infections and gout (11% of all hospitalizations of patients with gout; 1998-2000 [8.9%], 2015-2016 [14.5%]). Compared to patients without gout, patients with gout hospitalized with serious infections were older (median age 65 versus 74 years), more of them had a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score ≥2 (42% versus 65%), and fewer were female (53% versus 35%) or non-White (40% versus 35%), respectively. The most common infection was pneumonia (52%) in 1998-2000 and sepsis (52%) in 2015-2016. Median hospital charges and hospital stays were higher for patients with sepsis and OIs in 2015-2016 ($41,000-$42,000; 5.1-5.5 days) versus those with UTI, pneumonia, or SSTIs ($15,000-$17,000; 3.0-3.9 days). Compared to patients with sepsis, the multivariable-adjusted odds of health care utilization and in-hospital mortality were significantly lower for patients with UTI, SSTIs, and pneumonia, and non-home discharge or in-hospital mortality were lower in patients with OIs. Among patients hospitalized with infections, older age, Medicaid coverage, a higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score, Black race, and Northeast and nonrural hospital location were associated with significantly higher health care utilization and mortality, while female sex, Medicare insurance, and lower income were associated with higher utilization. Given an increasing rate of serious infections, especially sepsis and pneumonia, in individuals with gout, development of effective interventions targeting factors associated with health care utilization and mortality will improve outcomes and reduce burden.

P491 Infectious risk of vedolizumab compared with other biological agents in the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut selective anti-α 4β 7 integrin antibody for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with a well-known optimal safety profile. We aimed to compare the risk of infections of VDZ with that of anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab, in patients with both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods All CD and UC patients undergoing biological treatment at our centre between June 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively included. All infectious complications were registered, considering both inpatient and outpatient events. A comparison of exposure-adjusted infection rate of vedolizumab with that of anti-TNF drugs and ustekinumab was carried out, with a specific focus on the rate of gut infections. All infection rates were expressed in events per patient-years (PYs). Results The overall exposure-adjusted infection rate was 11.5/100 PYs. Detailed information about the infectious complications related to the different biologics is reported in Table 1. The most common infections were respiratory tract infections, cutaneous infections, HSV infections/reactivations, and gut infections. The rate of serious infections was 1.3/100 PYs. Among the 85 patients who were on a VDZ therapy, 17 (3 CD and 14 UC, median age 64, IQR 31–68) suffered an infectious complication. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for vedolizumab was 17.5/100 PYs, with CD patients having a lower infection risk compared with UC patients (p = 0.035). Gut infections were observed in 3.0% of the whole patient population (1.5/100 PYs) and were more common in the VDZ group (p = 0.0001). Conclusion Our study confirms the good safety profile of vedolizumab. Among patients treated with vedolizumab, those with UC have a higher risk of developing infectious complications. Patients treated with vedolizumab have a higher risk of gut infections compared with patients treated with anti-TNF drugs or ustekinumab. Presumably, this could be due to the gut-selective mechanism of action of vedolizumab.

OP23 Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib as induction therapy in patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from phase 3 U-ACCOMPLISH study

BackgroundUpadacitinib (UPA) is a selective and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor.U-ACCOMPLISH is one of two phase 3 induction trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodsU-ACCOMPLISH was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03653026) that enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC (defined as adapted Mayo score 5–9 with centrally read endoscopic score 2–3) who had inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids and/or biologics. Patients were randomized 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or placebo (PBO) for 8 weeks. At week 8, responders entered the maintenance phase and non-responders entered the extended treatment period to receive open-label UPA 45 mg QD for additional 8 weeks.The primary endpoint (clinical remission per adapted Mayo Score) and ranked secondary endpoints including symptomatic, endoscopic– histologic evaluations from the 8-week PBO-controlled period are reported here. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported.Results522 patients were randomized (UPA, n=345; PBO, n=177); the intent-to-treat population included 341 patients in UPA and 174 patients in PBO group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups; 50.7% and 51.1% were biologic inadequate responders in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA 45 mg QD (33.5%) versus PBO (4.1%) achieved the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference: 29.0% [23.2, 34.7]; P<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA versus PBO also achieved all ranked secondary endpoints (all P<0.001; Figure 1).Serious adverse events were reported by 3.2% and 4.5% of patients in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 2). Similar rates of serious infection were observed in both groups (0.6%); 2 events each of herpes zoster and opportunistic infection were reported in UPA group. No active tuberculosis, malignancy, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, or deaths were reported in the study. One patient with venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and 1 patient with gastrointestinal perforation were reported in the placebo group. ConclusionIn U-ACCOMPLISH, 8-week UPA 45 mg QD induction treatment led to statistically significant improvements in clinical, endoscopic, and combined endoscopic-histologic endpoints. The treatment was well tolerated, and the safety profile and AE prevalence was comparable with previous studies of UPA with no new safety signals identified.