Non-home Discharge Rate Research Articles

Clinical Frailty Scale Predicts Outcomes After Elective Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), used to define frail patients, is significantly associated with clinical outcomes. The CFS can predict postoperative prognosis after cardiovascular procedures. However, no reports exist on the relationship between frailty defined by the CFS and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes. We analyzed data obtained from patients who underwent TEVAR between January 2011 and December 2021. Frailty was assessed using the 9-point CFS and was defined as a score of ≥5 points. The primary outcome was the 5-year overall survival rate. The secondary outcomes included the rate of freedom from aneurysm-related death at 5 years, postoperative complications, length of stay, rate of nonhome discharge, need for mobility assistance, 30-day mortality rate, and re-intervention rate. Of 331 patients who underwent TEVAR, 186 were included. The mean age of frail (n=36) and nonfrail (n=150) patients was 73.2 ± 7.3 years and 70.9 ± 9.0 years, respectively (p=0.15). The length of stay (17 [9-39] vs 11 [10-16] days; p=0.09) and re-intervention rate (8.3% vs 13.3%; p=0.58) were not significantly different, although frail patients had a higher rate of nonhome discharge (33.3% vs 4.7%; p<0.001), need for mobility assistance (38.9% vs 6.0%; p<0.001), and 30-day mortality (11.1% vs 0.7%; p=0.005) than nonfrail patients. The 5-year overall survival rate after TEVAR was 6.2 ± 5.5 and 84.5 ± 3.4% in frail and nonfrail patients (p<0.001). The median survival time was 22 (6-40) and 136 (87-138&x41; months, the number of recorded deaths in 5 years was 28 (77.8%) and 18 (12.0%; p<0.001), and the rate of freedom from aneurysm-related death at 5 years was 80.7%±11.2% and 96.9%±1.5% (p=0.01) in frail and nonfrail patients, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 53.3 ± 2.7 months. Multivariate Cox regression indicated that the CFS (hazard ratio, 10.14; 95% confidence interval, 5.06-20.32) was significantly associated with overall survival. The CFS is a valuable prognosis predictor, and TEVAR for frail patients with a high surgical risk could not improve the overall survival. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in frail patients should be approached cautiously. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) could be a useful predictor of prognosis in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). A significant difference was observed between frail and nonfrail patients in the 5-year overall survival rate following TEVAR. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for frail patients (CFS was ≥5 points) could not improve overall survival because their death was attributed to their comorbidities. Thus, TEVAR in frail patients should be approached cautiously.

Are Rapid Recovery Pathways Transferrable Across Institutions? Outcomes of a Community Hospital through the Implementation Process.

Prior studies have found potential disparities in outcomes for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in academic vs. community and high- vs. low-volume institutions. In light of these findings and the proven efficacy of rapid recovery pathways, we sought to evaluate whether an established rapid recovery pathway was transferrable to a relatively low-volume (<300 TJAs annually) community hospital after merging with an established high-volume TJA center. A retrospective review of 1,661 primary elective TJAs performed at a single institution from 2018 to 2024 was performed. Cases were classified into the baseline (prepathway), pathway implementation, and established pathway periods. Univariate analyses were performed to compare average length of stay (LOS), % 0/1 day LOS, and % nonhome discharges over the study periods. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare demographics and outcomes during the implementation and established pathway periods after the adoption of the health system's electronic medical record. Over the study period, average LOS declined from 3.3 ± 1.7 days during the baseline period to 1.1 ± 1.8 days during established pathway period (P < 0.001), whereas the rate of 0/1 day LOS increased from 2.8% to 84.5% (P < 0.001). The rate of nonhome discharge decreased from 48.6% at baseline to 7.5% in the established pathway period (P < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons demonstrated that significant improvements in outcomes occurred between each of the three study periods. After adoption of the electronic medical record, demographics and outcomes were similar between the pathway implementation and established pathway periods. The adoption of an established rapid recovery pathway at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in both LOS and nonhome discharge rates for TJA patients. These findings demonstrate that such pathways are transferrable and reproducible across institutions. Through the adoption of established pathways and protocols, community-based TJA programs can achieve outcomes in alignment with national benchmarks.

Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Robotic-assisted versus Conventional Mitral Valve Repair: A National Analysis

Robotic approaches have been increasingly utilized for cardiothoracic operations, though concerns regarding costs remain. We evaluated short-term outcomes and costs of robotic-assisted and conventional mitral valve repair (MV-repair), hypothesizing that cost differences would be mitigated at high-volume programs. Adults undergoing elective MV-repair from 2016 to 2020 were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with rheumatic heart disease, mitral stenosis, and those undergoing concomitant operations were excluded. Generalized linear models were utilized to evaluate the association between approach and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, costs, and 90-day readmissions. Annual institutional MV-repair volume was modeled using restricted cubic splines, and cost differences subsequently evaluated by volume tertile. Of 40,738 patients, 9.8% underwent robotic-assisted MV-repair. Risk-adjusted outcomes including mortality, stroke, reoperation, respiratory complications, postoperative infection, and readmission were comparable between the two groups, while those undergoing robotic-assisted MV-repair had lower rates of non-home discharge. The median cost of robotic-assisted MV-repair was greater than conventional surgery ($46,800 vs $38,500, p<0.001). Despite a 1.3-day decrement (95% CI 1.1-1.6) in length of stay, robotic-assisted MV-repair was associated with greater risk-adjusted costs by $10,500 (95% CI 5,800-15,200). Programs in the highest volume tertile exhibited comparable costs for robotic-assisted and conventional MV-repair (cost difference $5,900, 95% CI -1,200-12,200, p>0.05). Robotic-assisted MV-repair had comparable short-term outcomes relative to conventional surgery. Despite increased costs of robotic-assisted MV-repair overall, high-volume programs had similar risk-adjusted costs by approach. These findings support the designation and performance of robotic MV-repair at centers of excellence in the United States.

Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a comparative propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes

BackgroundCompared to open pancreaticoduodenectomies (OPD), the robotic (RPD) approach decreases the rate of complication and the length of stay (LOS). However, it remains unknown if these benefits persist in octogenarians, who are at higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database was performed to identify patients aged 80 years or older who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2015–2021. Patients who underwent RPD or OPD were compared using inversed probability weighting of the propensity score. Outcomes assessed include operative time, LOS, non-home discharge, major complications, unplanned readmission, return to the operating room, mortality, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. ResultsOf 30,751 patients, 1720 were octogenarians. One thousand six hundred twenty-five patients (94 %) underwent OPD, and 95 (6 %) underwent RPD. RPD was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of major complications (32.6 % vs. 45.6 %; p < 0.01) and a lower rate of non-home discharge (24.7 % vs. 34.3%; p < 0.05). However, RPD was associated with a longer operative time (438 min vs. 342 min; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in other assessed outcomes. ConclusionRPD may reduce major postoperative complications and non-home discharges compared to the open approach for octogenarians.

Early clinical outcomes and medical complications following long segment fusion for adult spinal deformity with and without three column osteotomy

BackgroundSurgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) commonly involves long-segment fusion with or without three column osteotomies (3CO) to provide satisfactory correction of sagittal and coronal balance. While some clinical studies have implicated 3CO as a driver of high surgical complication rates, these prior investigations are limited by small sample size. Herein, we compare early outcomes and adverse events in patients undergoing long segment posterior spinal fusion for ASD with and without 3CO. MethodsA multicenter administrative database was queried for patients undergoing elective posterior spinal fusion for ASD. Patients were stratified based upon long segment fusion with and without 3CO. Preoperative patient demographics, procedural characteristics, hospitalization events, and postoperative complication rates were evaluated. Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test were utilized where appropriate to compare differences between the two groups for continuous and categorical variables. Results340 cases met the inclusion criteria, of which 156 involved 3CO. Patients who required 3CO had a lower rate of preoperative diabetes (22.3 % vs 10.3 %, p = 0.003), higher rates of non-home discharge (26.2 % vs 57.1 %, p < 0.001), longer operation time (245.62 ± 9.45 vs. 434.40 ± 11.65, p < 0.001), and longer length of stay (4.17 ± 0.66 vs. 7.76 ± 0.83, p < 0.001). In terms of complications, 3CO patients had higher rates of deep surgical site infection (0 % vs 3.2 %, p = 0.02), reintubation (0 % vs 4.5 %, p = 0.004), inability to wean off ventilator (0 % vs 2.6 %, p = 0.04), and perioperative blood transfusion (20.1 % vs 76.3 %, p < 0.001). ConclusionsIn this retrospective analysis, posterior 3CO was frequently undertaken but associated with higher risk for postoperative adverse events following spinal deformity correction.

Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Depression Following Vascular Surgery Procedures

IntroductionFemale patients frequently experience worse clinical outcomes than male patients after undergoing vascular surgery procedures. However, it is unclear whether these sex-based disparities also impact mental health outcomes. This study was designed to investigate sex differences in patient-reported outcome measures of depression for patients undergoing vascular surgery. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 107 patients (73 males and 34 females) who underwent vascular surgery procedures between January 2016 and April 2023. These patients completed a Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0-Depression assessment 90 d before surgery and at least once after surgery. After stratifying patients by sex, we analyzed changes in PROMIS depression scores using a multiple mixed-effects linear regression model. Then, logistic regression was used to compare the proportion of patients who achieved a clinically meaningful difference in PROMIS depression score within 15 mo after surgery. ResultsThere was no significant difference between female and male patients among rates of complications, length of hospital stay, or rates of nonhome discharge. However, female sex was associated with significantly improved PROMIS depression scores after surgery compared to male sex (P = 0.034). Furthermore, female patients were over 3-fold more likely than male patients to reach the minimal clinically important difference threshold for improvement in PROMIS depression scores (odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval 1.39-15.61). ConclusionsThese results suggest that female sex is associated with improved patient-reported measures of depression after undergoing vascular surgery. Clinicians should consider these mental health benefits when evaluating female patients for vascular interventions.

Evaluating the performance of the SORG machine learning algorithm for predicting discharge disposition in lumbar surgery patients

PurposeProtracted admissions following lumbar surgeries are rising, often stemming from inefficient identification of patients requiring nonhome discharge for rehabilitation. The SORG Orthopaedic Research Group at Harvard Medical School have developed a machine learning algorithm for predicting discharge following lumbar surgery. This study assessed its predictive performance on an independent tertiary centre patient cohort. MethodsMedical records were retrospectively reviewed for all elective adult lumbar disc degeneration or herniation surgeries performed between July 2017–2021 at a tertiary neurosurgical centre in the United Kingdom. Preoperative variables were collated and discharge destinations noted. Algorithm predictions were analysed using the concordance (c) statistic, Brier score and calibration plot. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated, and a decision curve analysis (DCA) plotted. Results251 subjects were included (48.2 % female, mean age 55.3 years). 2.8 % underwent nonhome discharge. Most had surgery at 1/2 spinal levels (98.4 %) and were functionally independent (84.5 %). Algorithm predictions yielded a 0.88 c-statistic and 0.029 Brier score. The algorithm was miscalibrated to the data (calibration plot slope 1.31 and intercept -1.12). At a 0.25 threshold for nonroutine discharge risk, the PPV was 0.19 and NPV 0.98. DCA revealed limited clinical utility. ConclusionsAlgorithm predictive performance was mixed for this cohort, displaying strong discrimination but poor calibration and overestimation of nonroutine discharges. Differences in patient management practices and the low nonhome discharge rate may explain this. Larger validation studies across different healthcare systems, alongside geographically specific algorithm development, will improve predictive accuracy prior to clinical application.

Vulnerable populations and the emergency ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionVentral hernias can be repaired electively; however, many circumstances require emergency repair. The association between sociodemographic status and rate of emergency repair are unclear and the Social Vulnerability Index may be a useful tool to better understanding this association. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between Social Vulnerability Index and emergency ventral hernia repair. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012–2018) data for patients at a level 1 trauma center. We included patients who had an open ventral hernia repair. Social Vulnerability Index was based on residential address at the time of surgery. We conducted univariate and bivariate statistics, including χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare high and low social vulnerability. ResultsOur sample had 1,017 patients. Patients who underwent emergency operations were older (P = .025) and had higher Social Vulnerability Index (P = .029). Patients in the high Social Vulnerability Index group were 1.5 times more likely to receive emergency surgery (P = .047). Emergency repair was also associated with increased frequency of nonhome discharge (9% vs 2%, P = .001) and higher mean work relative value unit (15.4 vs 11.9, P < .001). ConclusionPatients requiring emergency ventral hernia repair have significantly higher Social Vulnerability Index than those undergoing elective repair. This vulnerable population also has increased cost associated with the repair and higher rates of nonhome discharge. This work provides a foundation for efforts to reach patients in high Social Vulnerability Index environments at an earlier stage to achieve earlier elective repair.

Definitions and adverse outcomes of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care: A scoping review on current evidence.

Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of muscle mass and strength, can hinder postoperative recovery and raise mortality rates. However, the current evidence on the harmful effects of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care is unclear. This scoping review investigates different definitions that were used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care and what adverse consequences have been examined. We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and Embase, following the PRISMA guidelines. We included original studies that examined clinical outcomes (such as length of hospital stay, rate of non-home discharge, rate of subsequent falls, rate of refractures, mortality, and functional outcome/quality of life) in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care (aged 65 years and above) with diagnosed sarcopenia (S) compared to a group without sarcopenia (NS). Our search identified 2,748 publications. Out of these, 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were from Asia (n = 13). A total of 6174 patients were examined, with a prevalence of sarcopenia in 14-92%. 11 articles focused on patients with hip joint pathologies. Most studies diagnosed sarcopenia according to the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGSOP1 or AWGSOP2) definitions (n = 10). Length of hospital stay was investigated in 13 studies. Seven studies assessed rates of non-home discharge rates. Subsequent falls were not investigated in any of the studies. 1 study reported the overall refracture rate (S: 10.4%; NS: 5.8%). Mortality was assessed in 11 studies (S: 1-60.5%; NS: 0-39.5%). The functional outcome/quality of life was investigated by 17 studies (Barthel Index decline S: -4.5 to -15.3 points; NS: -11.7 to -54.7 points). Sarcopenia has been increasingly studied in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care but there is a lack of consistent definition criteria. This scoping review suggests that sarcopenia may be associated with prolonged length of stay, higher rates of non-home discharge, and increased mortality among older patients in orthopedic and trauma care. However, prospective studies are necessary to establish the relationship between sarcopenia and refractures, falls, and functional outcome/quality of life among older patients in orthopedic and trauma care.

Frailty in intracranial meningioma resection: the risk analysis index demonstrates strong discrimination for predicting non-home discharge and in-hospital mortality.

Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes following intracranial meningioma resection (IMR). The role of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) in predicting postoperative outcomes following IMR is nascent but may inform preoperative patient selection and surgical planning. IMR patients from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were identified using diagnostic and procedural codes (2019-2020). The relationship between preoperative RAI-measured frailty and primary outcomes (non-home discharge (NHD), in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (extended length of stay (eLOS), complication rates) was assessed via multivariate analyses. The discriminatory accuracy of the RAI for primary outcomes was measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis. A total of 23,230 IMR patients (mean age = 59) were identified, with frailty statuses stratified by RAI score: 0-20 "robust" (R)(N = 10,665, 45.9%), 21-30 "normal" (N)(N = 8,895, 38.3%), 31-40 "frail" (F)(N = 2,605, 11.2%), and 41+ "very frail" (VF)(N = 1,065, 4.6%). Rates of NHD (R 11.5%, N 29.7%, F 60.8%, VF 61.5%), in-hospital mortality (R 0.5%, N 1.8%, F 3.8%, VF 7.0%), eLOS (R 13.2%, N 21.5%, F 40.9%, VF 46.0%), and complications (R 7.5%, N 11.6%, F 15.7%, VF 16.0%) significantly increased with increasing frailty thresholds (p < 0.001). The RAI demonstrated strong discrimination for NHD (C-statistic: 0.755) and in-hospital mortality (C-statistic: 0.754) in AUROC curve analysis. Increasing RAI-measured frailty is significantly associated with increased complication rates, eLOS, NHD, and in-hospital mortality following IMR. The RAI demonstrates strong discrimination for predicting NHD and in-hospital mortality following IMR, and may aid in preoperative risk stratification.

The Financial Burden of Patient Comorbidities on Total Hip Arthroplasties—A Matched Cohort Analysis of High Comorbidity Burden and Non–High Comorbidity Burden Patients

BackgroundThe impact of increased patient comorbidities on the cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THAs) is lacking. This study aimed to compare revenue, costs, and short-term (90 days) surgical outcomes between patients who have and do not have a high comorbidity burden (HCB). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 14,949 patients who underwent an elective, unilateral THA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified into HCB (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5 and American Society of Anesthesiology scores of 3 or 4) and non-HCB groups, and were further 1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Perioperative data, revenue, costs, and contribution margins (CMs) of the inpatient episode were compared between groups. Also, 90-day readmissions and revisions were compared between groups. Of the 11,717 patients who had available financial data (n = 1,017 HCB, n = 10,700 non-HCB), 1,914 patients were included in the final matched analyses (957 per group). ResultsTotal (P < .001) and direct (P < .001) costs were significantly higher for HCB patients. Comparable revenue between cohorts (P = .083) resulted in a significantly decreased CM in the HCB patient group (P < .001). The HCB patients were less likely to be discharged home (P < .001) and had significantly higher 90-day readmission rates (P = .049). ConclusionsIncreased THA costs for HCB patients were not matched by increased revenue, resulting in decreased CM. Higher rates of nonhome discharge and readmissions in the HCB population add to the additional financial burden. Adjustments to the current reimbursement models should better account for the increased financial burden of HCB patients undergoing THA and ensure access to care for all patient populations. Level of evidenceIII.

Impact of early MRI in ischemic strokes beyond hyper-acute stage to improve patient outcomes, enable early discharge, and realize cost savings

BackgroundEarly in-patient MR Imaging may assist in identifying stroke etiology, facilitating prompt secondary prevention for ischemic strokes (IS), and potentially enhancing patient outcomes. This study explores the impact of early in patient MRI on IS patient outcomes and healthcare resource use beyond the hyper-acute stage. MethodsIn this retrospective registry-based study, 771 admitted transient ischemic attack (TIA) and IS patients at Halifax's QEII Health Centre from 2015 to 2019 underwent in-patient MRI. Cohort was categorized into two groups based on MRI timing: early (within 48 h) and late. Logistic regression and Poisson log-linear models, adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, acute stroke protocol (ASP) activation, thrombolytic, and thrombectomy, were employed to examine in-hospital, discharge, post-discharge, and healthcare resource utilization outcomes. ResultsAmong the cohort, 39.6 % received early in-patient MRI. ASP activation and TIA were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving early MRI. Early MRI was independently associated with a lower rate of symptomatic changes in neurological status during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.88), higher odds of good functional outcomes at discharge (1.55; 1.11–2.16), lower rate of non-home discharge (0.65; 0.46–0.91), shorter length of stay (regression coefficient, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.89–0.97), and reduced direct cost of hospitalization (0.77; 0.75–0.79). ConclusionEarly in-patient MRI utilization in IS patients post-hyper-acute stage was independently associated with improved patient outcomes and decreased healthcare resource utilization, underscoring the potential benefits of early MRI during in-patient management of IS. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is warranted to validate these findings.

Elective Single-Level Primary Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy Is Associated With Decreased Resource Utilization Versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare elective single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in terms of (1) cost, (2) length of hospital stay, and (3) discharge destination in Medicare patients. A sub-analysis of potential cost drivers was also performed. In the era of value-based medicine, there is substantial interest in reducing the cost of care. Both ACDF and PCDF are used to treat DCM but carry different morbidity and risk profiles that can impact hospital resource utilization. However, this has not been assessed on a national level. Patients undergoing single-level elective ACDF and PCDF surgery were identified using the 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) Limited Data Set (LDS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2019 Impact File. Multivariate models of hospital cost of care, length of stay, and discharge destination were performed, controlling for confounders. A univariate sub-analysis of 9 revenue centers was performed. In all, 3942 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean cost of elective single-level cervical fusion for myelopathy was $18,084±10,783, and the mean length of stay was 2.45±2.95d. On multivariate analysis, ACDF was independently associated with decreased cost of $5,814 ( P <0.001), shorter length of stay by 1.1 days ( P <0.001), and decreased risk of nonhome discharge destination by 58% (adjusted odds ratio: 0.422, P <0.001).On sub-analysis of 9 revenue centers, medical/surgical supply ($10,497, 44%), operating room charges ($5401, 23%), and accommodations ($3999, 17%) were the largest drivers of charge differences. Single-level elective primary ACDF for DCM was independently associated with decreased cost, decreased hospital length of stay, and a lower rate of nonhome discharge compared with PCDF. Medical and surgical supply, operating room, and accommodation differences between ACDF and PCDF are potential areas for intervention. Increased granularity in reimbursement structures is warranted to prevent the creation of disincentives to the treatment of patients with DCM with pathology that is better addressed with PCDF. Level-III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Association Between Race and Short-Term Outcomes Across 3988 Consecutive Single-Level Spinal Fusions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Race has implications for access to medical care. However, the impact of race, after access to care has been attained, remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to isolate the relationship between race and short-term outcomes across patients undergoing a single, common neurosurgical procedure. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 3988 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only open lumbar fusion at a single, multihospital, academic medical center were enrolled over a 6-year period. Among them, 3406 patients self-identified as White, and 582 patients self-identified as Black. Outcome disparities between all White patients vs all Black patients were estimated using logistic regression. Subsequently, coarsened exact matching controlled for outcome-mitigating factors; White and Black patients were exact-matched 1:1 on key demographic and health characteristics (matched n = 1018). Primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, discharge disposition, and intraoperative complication. RESULTS: Before matching, Black patients experienced increased rate of nonhome discharge, readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations (all P &lt; .001). After exact matching, Black patients were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, P &lt; .001) and had higher risk of 30-day and 90-day readmissions (OR 2.24, P &lt; .001; OR 1.91, P &lt; .001; respectively) and ED visits (OR 1.79, P = .017; OR 2.09, P &lt; .001). Black patients did not experience greater risk of intraoperative complication (unintentional durotomy). CONCLUSION: Between otherwise homogenous spinal fusion cohorts, Black patients experienced unfavorable short-term outcomes. These disparities were not explained by differences in intraoperative complications. Further investigation must characterize and mitigate institutional and societal factors that contribute to outcome disparities.

Racial disparities in short-term spinal fusion outcomes across 4263 consecutive patients.

Race plays a salient role in access to surgical care. However, few investigations have assessed the impact of race within surgical populations after care has been delivered. The objective of this study was to employ an exact matching protocol to a homogenous population of spine surgery patients in order to isolate the relationships between race and short-term postoperative outcomes. In total, 4263 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a single multihospital academic medical center were retrospectively enrolled. Of these patients, 3406 patients self-identified as White and 857 patients self-identified as non-White. Outcomes were initially compared across all patients via logistic regression. Subsequently, White patients and non-White patients were exactly matched on the basis of key demographic and health characteristics (1520 matched patients). Outcome disparities were evaluated between the exact-matched cohorts. Primary outcomes were readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, intraoperative complications, and discharge disposition. Before matching, non-White patients were less likely to be discharged home and more likely to be readmitted, evaluated in the ED, and undergo reoperation. After matching, non-White patients experienced higher rates of nonhome discharge, readmissions, and ED visits. Non-White patients did not have more surgical complications either before or after matching. Between otherwise similar cohorts of spinal fusion cases, non-White patients experienced unfavorable discharge disposition and higher risk of multiple adverse postoperative outcomes. However, these findings were not accounted for by differences in surgical complications, suggesting that structural factors underlie the observed disparities.

The Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Proximal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis.

(1) Background: This study examines frailty's impact on proximal aortic surgery outcomes. (2) Methods: All patients with a thoracic aortic aneurysm who underwent aortic root, ascending aorta, or arch surgery from the 2016-2017 National Inpatient Sample were included. Frailty was defined by the Adjusted Clinical Groups Frailty Indicator. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality and a composite of death, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major bleeding (MACE). (3) Results: Among 5745 patients, 405 (7.0%) met frailty criteria. Frail patients were older, with higher rates of chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. There was no difference in in-hospital death (4.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.169); however, the frail group exhibited higher rates of stroke and AKI. Frail patients had a longer length of stay (17 vs. 8 days), and higher rates of non-home discharge (74.1% vs. 54.3%) than non-frail patients (both p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed increased morbidity and mortality in frail individuals. After adjusting for patient comorbidities and hospital characteristics, frailty independently predicted MACE (OR 4.29 [1.88-9.78], p = 0.001), while age alone did not (OR 1.00 [0.99-1.02], p = 0.568). Urban teaching center status predicted a lower risk of MACE (OR 0.27 [0.08-0.94], p = 0.039). (4) Conclusions: Frailty is associated with increased morbidity in proximal aortic surgery and is a more significant predictor of mortality than age. Coordinated treatment in urban institutions may enhance outcomes for this high-risk group.

Aspirin prophylaxis is not associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism in arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a non-inferiority study.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with various prophylactic anticoagulants utilized to decrease risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and perioperative outcomes associated with aspirin for VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty for FNF. Medical records of 1,220 patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an urban academic center from 2011 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), VTE, 90-day hospital encounters, and discharge disposition, were collected. Outcomes for patients prescribed aspirin (n = 214) were compared to those prescribed non-aspirin VTE prophylaxis (n = 1006) using propensity score matching. Patients who received aspirin had higher rates of THA (36.0 vs 26.7%; p = 0.008). There were no significant risk-adjusted differences in the incidence of VTE (0.5 vs 0.5%, p = 1.000) and 90-day readmissions (10.4 vs 12.3%, p = 0.646) between patients prescribed aspirin and non-aspirin VTE prophylaxis, respectively. Patients prescribed non-aspirin agents had higher rates of non-home discharge (73.9 vs 58.5%; p < 0.001) and longer LOS (143.5 vs 124.9h; p = 0.005). Sub-analysis of patients prescribed aspirin and non-aspirin prophylaxis based on comorbidity scores demonstrated no difference in VTE incidence for low (0.0 vs 1.6%, p = 1.000) and high scores (0.0 vs 0.0%, p = 1.000), respectively. Aspirin is not associated with increased incidence of VTE after HHA or THA for FNF. Aspirin prophylaxis should be considered in hip fracture patients to mitigate bleeding risk, particularly those with low to intermediate VTE risk. Level III, Retrospective study.

Octogenarians fare better under local anesthesia for elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveWith an aging patient population, an increasing number of octogenarians are undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the United States. Multiple studies have shown that, for the general population, use of local anesthetic (LA) for EVAR is associated with improved short-term and long-term outcomes as compared with performing these operations under general anesthesia (GA). Therefore, this study aimed to study the association of LA for elective EVARs with perioperative outcomes, among octogenarians. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2021) was used to conduct this study. Octogenarians (Aged ≥80 years) were selected and sorted into two study groups: LA (Group I) and GA (Group II). Our primary outcomes were length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, return to operating room, cardiopulmonary complications, and discharge location. ResultsOf the 16,398 selected patients, 1197 patients (7.3%) were included in Group I, and 15,201 patients (92.7%) were in Group II. Procedural time was significantly shorter for the LA group (114.6 vs 134.6; P < .001), as was estimated blood loss (152 vs 222 cc; P < .001). Length of stay was significantly shorter (1.8 vs 2.6 days; P < .001), and patients were more likely to be discharged home (LA 88.8% vs GA 86.9%; P = .036) in the LA group. Group I also experienced fewer pulmonary complications; only 0.17% experienced pneumonia and 0.42% required ventilator support compared with 0.64% and 1.02% in Group II, respectively. This finding corresponded to fewer days in the intensive care unit for Group I (0.41 vs 0.69 days; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in 30-day mortality cardiac, renal, or access site-related complications. Return to operating room was also equivocal between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed GA was associated with a significantly longer length of stay and significantly higher rates of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59; P < .001 and AOR, 1.40; P = .025, respectively). When stratified by the New York Heart Association classification system, classes I, II, III, and IV (1.55; P < .001; 1.26; P = .029; 2.03; P < .001; 4.07; P < .001, respectively) were associated with significantly longer hospital stays. ConclusionsThe use of LA for EVARs in octogenarians is associated with shorter lengths of stay, fewer respiratory complications, and home discharge. These patients also experienced shorter procedure times and less blood loss. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality, return to operating room, or access-related complications. LA for octogenarians undergoing EVAR should be considered more frequently to shorten hospital stays and decrease complication rates.

Impact of Dementia on the Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Head and Neck Cancers: A National Study.

Dementia, a growing concern among the elderly, has an increased poor postoperative outcome that goes unrecognized by many. Our study aims to establish if dementia plays a role in the outcomes of head and neck cancer patients that undergo resections. We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2019 with a primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer who underwent surgical resection. Outcomes analyzed include postoperative delirium, ICU stay, complications, length of stay, and non-routine discharge. A total of 77095 patients were included, of which 1140 patients had dementia. The mean age of the patients with dementia was 77.5 years (±9.1) versus 63.2 years (±12.1) with no dementia. Dementia patients had a higher non-home discharge rate (77.2% vs 46.8%, p = <0.001), extended length of stay (10.9 days ±14.7 vs 7.9 days ±8.8), postoperative delirium (15.4% vs 1.5%, p = <0.001), and longer ICU stay (8.3% vs 5.8%) as compared with patients with no dementia. A higher number of patients with Dementia were placed in long-term facilities (53.5% vs 14.6%) postoperatively. More dementia patients (7.9% vs 0.9%) were transferred in from another health care facility for surgery. Dementia was associated with higher odds of delirium (OR, 6.36; 95% CI, 5.2-7.77), non-routine discharge (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.76-2.3), ventilation (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.05), and length of stay (estimate 3.01, 95% CI, 1.84-4.184). Preoperative dementia significantly impacts postoperative delirium, non-home discharge, and extended length of stay in head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1258-1264, 2024.

Depression Is Associated With Non-Home Discharge After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

IntroductionDepression is disproportionately high in patients with coronary artery disease and has been associated with adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). One quality metric, non-home discharge (NHD), can have substantial implications for patients and health care resource utilization. Depression increases the risk of NHD after many operations, but it has not been studied after CABG. We hypothesized that a history of depression would be associated with an increased risk of NHD following CABG. MethodsCABG cases were identified from the 2018 National Inpatient Sample using ICD-10 codes. Depression, demographic data, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), rate of NHD were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests where a P-value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent association between depression and NHD as well as LOS while controlling for confounders. ResultsThere were 31,309 patients, of which 2743 (8.8%) had depression. Depressed patients were younger, females, in a lower income quartile, and more medically complex. They also demonstrated more frequent NHD and prolonged LOS. After adjusted multivariable analysis, depressed patients had a 70% increased odds of NHD (adjusted odds ratio: 1.70 [1.52-1.89] P < 0.001) and a 24% increased odds of prolonged LOS (AOR: 1.24 [1.12-1.38] P < 0.001). ConclusionsFrom a national sample, depressed patients were associated with more frequent NHD following CABG. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate this, and it highlights the need for improved preoperative identification in order to improve risk stratification and timely allocation of discharge services.