Major Morbidity Rate Research Articles

Nationwide Outcome after Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at very High Risk (ISGPS-D) for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

To assess nationwide surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at very high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), categorized as ISGPS-D. Morbidity and mortality after ISGPS-D PD is perceived so high that a recent randomized trial advocated prophylactic total pancreatectomy (TP) as alternative aiming to lower this risk. However, current outcomes of ISGPS-D PD remain unknown as large nationwide series are lacking. Nationwide retrospective analysis including consecutive patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD (i.e., soft texture and pancreatic duct ≤3 mm), using the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2021). Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). The use of prophylactic TP to avoid POPF during the study period was assessed. Overall, 1402 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was 4.1% (n=57), which decreased to 3.7% (n=20/536) in the last 2 years. Major morbidity occurred in 642 patients (45.9%) and POPF in 410 (30.0%), which corresponded with failure to rescue in 8.9% (n=57/642). Patients with POPF had increased rates of major morbidity (88.0% vs. 28.3%; P<0.001) and mortality (6.3% vs. 3.5%; P=0.016), compared to patients without POPF. Among 190 patients undergoing TP, prophylactic TP to prevent POPF was performed in 4 (2.1%). This nationwide series found a 4.1% in-hospital mortality after ISGPS-D PD with 45.9% major morbidity, leaving little room for improvement through prophylactic TP. Nevertheless, given the outcomes in 30% of patients who develop POPF, future randomized trials should aim to prevent and mitigate POPF in this high-risk category.

Physical Prehabilitation in Patients who Underwent Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using GRADE and CINeMA Approach

BackgroundPhysical prehabilitation is recommended before major abdominal surgery to ameliorate short-term outcomes.MethodsA frequentist, random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to clarify which type of preoperative physical activity among aerobic exercise (AE), inspiratory muscle training (IMT), and resistance training produces benefits in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. The surface under the P-score, odds ratio (OR), or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. The results were adjusted by using the component network approach. The critical endpoints were overall and major morbidity rate and mortality rate. The important but not critical endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and pneumonia.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 25 studies. The best approaches for overall morbidity rate were AE and AE + IMT (OR = 0.61, p-score = 0.76, and OR = 0.66, p-score = 0.68). The best approaches for pneumonia were AE + IMT and AE (OR = 0.21, p-score = 0.91, and OR = 0.52, p-score = 0.68). The component analysis confirmed that the best incremental OR (0.30; 95% CI 0.12–0.74) could be obtained using AE + IMT. The best approach for LOS was AE alone (MD − 1.63 days; 95% CI − 3.43 to 0.18). The best combination of components was AE + IMT (MD − 1.70; 95% CI − 2.06 to − 1.27).ConclusionsPhysical prehabilitation reduces the overall morbidity rate, pneumonia, and length of stay. The most relevant effect of prehabilitation requires the simultaneous use of AE and IMT.

Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.

HPB P51 One hundred consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies performed by a newly appointed consultant surgeon: perioperative clinical outcomes

Abstract Background Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) involves surgical resection of pathology affecting the pancreas and periampullary region. PD was historically associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. More recently there has been a reduction in 90-day mortality (2-5% in most series), however morbidity remains high. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a main source of major morbidity after PD. There is conflicting data regarding POPF and morbidity rates, which may be higher for newly appointed compared to established consultants, reflecting reduced operative exposure for senior trainees. We present a consecutive series for a newly appointed consultant surgeon, with particular attention on clinical outcomes. Methods Between July 2018 and April 2023, 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed by a single surgeon (AA). Pancreatico-jejunostomy reconstruction was performed in all cases using a 2 layer duct to mucosa technique, reproduced from a senior surgical mentor (AD) during training. A post hoc analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to determine outcomes of these patients. Data collected included patient demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, intraoperative details, Pancreatic Fistula Risk Scores, morbidity details, length of stay and 90-day readmission. POPF was defined according to the latest definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Results 43 patients underwent a pylorus preserving procedure whereas 57 underwent a classic PD (M:F 3:2; median age 66 (range 20–85) years; median BMI 25.4; ASA ≥ III n=38). The mean operative time was 479 minutes; mean blood loss was 719ml and mean pancreatic duct size was 4.8mm. 13 patients underwent portal vein resection. Median hospital stay was 8 days (range 5–35). Clinically significant pancreatic fistula rate was 6% (5 Grade B and 1 Grade C). 90-day mortality was zero and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) rate was 7%. 90 day readmission rate was 6%. Conclusions This case series of 100 PDs by a newly appointed consultant demonstrates clinical outcomes which are comparable to more experienced established consultants in the best performing units. These outcomes can be attributed to standardisation and reproduction of operative reconstruction technique learned during training from a senior surgical mentor, meticulous post-operative care and multidisciplinary team working at a high-volume pancreatic surgery centre. Excellent clinical outcomes from PD can be achieved by new consultant surgeons, in an era of relatively diminished surgical exposure during training, by following these tenets.

Preoperative nutritional support in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery affects PREPARE score accuracy.

This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the Preoperative Pancreatic Resection (PREPARE) risk score in pancreatic resection patients. This prospective study included 216 patients who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients in our cohort with weight loss or lack of appetite received dietary advice and preoperative oral nutritional supplementation (600 kcal/day). Demographic, clinicopathological, operative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively. The PREPARE score and the predicted risk of major complications were computed for each patient. Differences in major postoperative complications were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. The predicted and observed risks of major complications were tested using the C-statistic. The study included 216 patients [117 men (54.2%)] with a median age of 65.0 (30.0-83.0) years. The majority of patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)' Physical Status score II (N = 164/216; 75.9%) and as "low risk" PREPARE score (N = 185/216; 85.6%) before the surgery. Only 4 (1.9%) patients were malnourished, with albumin levels of less than 3.5 g/dl. The most common type of pancreatic resection was a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (N = 122/216; 56.5%). Major morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 11.1% and 1.9%, respectively. The type of surgical procedure (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.849; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.208-12.264) and ASA score (HR: 3.089; 95% CI: 1.067-8.947) were significantly associated with the incidence of major postoperative complications in multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.657 for incremental values and 0.559 for risk categories, indicating a weak predictive model. The results of the present study suggest that the PREPARE risk score has low accuracy in predicting the risk of major complications in patients with consistent preoperative nutritional support. This limits the use of PREPARE risk score in future preoperative clinical routines.

Patient management after primary rectal cancer diagnosis. Special focus on surgical treatment for non-metastatic disease

Background: Rectal cancer is a public health priority. Primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the quality of care for non-metastatic rectal cancer using process and outcome indicators. Delay of management, length of stay and readmission rate, sphincter preservation, morbidity, number of examined lymph nodes, mortality, overall and disease-free survivals were evaluated. Secondary objectives were to estimate the relationship between possible predictive parameters for (1) anastomotic leakage (logistic regression), (2) overall or disease-free survivals (cox regression). Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 312 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer between 2016 and 2019. We focused on the 163 patients treated by surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Results: The treatment began within 33 days (range 0–264) after incidence, resection rate was 67%. Digestive continuity rate in lower, middle and upper rectum was 30%, 87% and 96%. Median of 14 lymph nodes (range 1–46) was analyzed. Length of stay and readmission rate were 11 days (range 3-56) and 4%, respectively. Within 90 postoperative days, clinical anastomotic leakage occurred in 9.2% of cases, major morbidity rate was 17%, mortality 1.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that stoma decreased the risk of anastomotic leakage [hazard ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence intervals: 0.04–0.63; p = 0.008]. The 5-year overall survival after surgery was 85 ± 4%, disease-free survival 83 ± 4%. Patients with major complications, male gender and R1/R2 resection margin had a poorer prognosis. Conclusion: This work showed encouraging results in rectal cancer treatment in our institution, our results were in line with recommendations at the time.

Oncological prognosis and morbidity of hepatectomy in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching and multicentre study

PurposeWith increasing life expectancy, the number of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has steadily increased. Hepatectomy remains the first-line treatment for HCC patients. However, the prognosis of hepatectomy for elderly patients with HCC remains unclear.MethodsClinical and follow-up data from 1331 HCC patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively retrieved from a multicentre database. Patients were divided into elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly (< 65 years) groups, and PSM was used to balance differences in the baseline characteristics. The postoperative major morbidity and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the two groups were compared and the independent factors that were associated with the two study endpoints were identified by multivariable regression analysis.ResultsOf the 1331 HCC patients enrolled in this study, 363 (27.27%) were elderly, while 968 (72.73%) were not. After PSM, 334 matched samples were obtained. In the propensity score matching (PSM) cohort, a higher rate of major morbidity was found in elderly patients (P = 0.040) but the CSS was similar in the two groups (P = 0.087). Multivariate analysis revealed that elderly age was not an independent risk factor associated with high rates of major morbidity (P = 0.117) or poor CSS (P = 0.873). The 1-, 3- and 5-year CSS rates in the elderly and non-elderly groups were 91.0% versus 86.2%, 71.3% versus 68.8% and 55.9% versus 58.0%, respectively. Preoperative alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, Child‒Pugh grade, intraoperative blood transfusion, extended hemi hepatectomy, and tumour diameter could affect the postoperative major morbidity and preoperative AFP level, cirrhosis, Child‒Pugh grade, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, and tumor diameter were independently and significantly associated with CSS.ConclusionAge itself had no significant effect on the prognosis of elderly patients with HCC after hepatectomy. Hepatectomy can be safely performed in elderly patients after cautious perioperative management.

Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts.

Retrospective evaluation of the effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on data derived from two prospective open-label observational multicenter studies in Italy regarding elective colorectal surgery. MBP for elective colorectal surgery remains a controversial issue with contrasting recommendations in current guidelines. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group, therefore, decided to estimate the effects of no MBP (treatment variable) versus MBP for elective colorectal surgery. A total of 8359 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis were enrolled in two consecutive prospective studies in 78 surgical centers in Italy from January 2019 to September 2021. A retrospective PSMA was performed on 5455 (65.3%) cases after the application of explicit exclusion criteria to eliminate confounders. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates; the secondary endpoints included SSI subgroups, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates. Overall length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was also considered. Two well-balanced groups of 1125 patients each were generated: group A (No MBP, true population of interest), and group B (MBP, control population), performing a PSMA considering 21 covariates. Group A vs. group B resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of AL [42 (3.5%) vs. 73 (6.0%) events; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005]. No difference was recorded between the two groups for SSI [73 (6.0%) vs. 85 (7.0%) events; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63-1.22; p = 0.441]. Regarding the secondary endpoints, no MBP resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of reoperation and LOS > 6days. This study confirms that no MBP before elective colorectal surgery is significantly associated with a lower risk of AL, reoperation rate, and LOS < 6days when compared with MBP.

Comparing High- and Low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Living-Donor Liver Transplantation to Determine Clinical Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (CHALICE Study).

Various studies have demonstrated that low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients have better outcomes with improved patient survival than deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. LDLT recipients gain the most from being transplanted at MELD <25-30; however, some existing data have outlined that LDLT may provide equivalent outcomes in high-MELD and low-MELD patients, although the term "high" MELD is arbitrarily defined in the literature and various cut-off scores are outlined between 20 and 30, although most commonly, the dividing threshold is 25. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare LDLT in high-MELD with that in low-MELD recipients to determine patient survival and graft survival, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications. Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42021261501, a systematic database search was conducted for the published literature between 1990 and 2021 and yielded a total of 10 studies with 2183 LT recipients; 490 were HM-LDLT recipients and 1693 were LM-LDLT recipients. Both groups had comparable mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years post-transplant (5-year HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.79; p-value 0.40) and graft survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.72, 1.63; p-value 0.71). No differences were observed in the rates of major morbidity, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complications, intra-abdominal bleeding, wound infection and rejection; however, the HM-LDLT group had higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. The high-MELD LDLT group had similar patient and graft survival and morbidities to the low-MELD LDLT group, despite being at higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. The data, primarily sourced from high-volume Asian centers, underscore the feasibility of living donations for liver allografts in high-MELD patients. Given the rising demand for liver allografts, it is sensible to incorporate these insights into U.S. transplant practices.

Yenidoğan Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde İzlenen Çok Düşük Doğum Ağırlıklı Bebeklerde Morbidite Ve Mortalite Sonuçları: 15 Yıl Arayla İki Beş Yıllık Dönemin Karşılaştırılması

Introduction and methods: &#x0D; Thanks to developments in perinatal and neonatal care, the survival rate of premature babies has increased. Depending on the development level of countries and units, some of the morbidity rates may increase, while others may decrease. In this retrospective cross-sectional study; the morbidity and mortality results of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants were evaluated by comparing the results of the infants in our previous study and the data of developed countries.&#x0D; Results: &#x0D; 203 infants were included in the last group. The mean birth weight of these babies was 976±308 g and the mean gestational age was 27.8±2.5 weeks. The rate of babies with a gestational age of 28 weeks and above were significantly lower than the first group containing 173 infants. Regarding major morbidities, the rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (moderate to severe) and necrotizing enterocolitis (&gt;stage 2) were significantly higher in the last group; while the rates of retinopathy of prematurity (&gt;grade 2), intraventricular hemorrhage (&gt;grade 2) and periventricular leukomalacia were also similar among the two groups. While survival rates were found to be similar, the survival rate without major morbidity was significantly lower in the last group.&#x0D; Conclusion: &#x0D; While the survival rates remained unchanged despite the observation of smaller babies in terms of birth weight and gestational age in the last period when mortality and morbidity data were compared with developed countries, the study demonstrated a need for improvement in mortality rates especially in small gestational weeks, while major morbidity rates were generally encouraging.

Completion Total Mesorectal Excision: A Case-Matched Comparison With Primary Resection.

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative and oncological results of completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) versus primary total mesorectal excision (pTME). Early-stage rectal cancer can be treated by local excision alone, which is associated with less surgical morbidity and improved functional outcomes compared with radical surgery. When high-risk histological features are present, cTME is indicated, with possible worse clinical and oncological outcomes compared to pTME. This retrospective cohort study included all patients that underwent TME surgery for rectal cancer performed in 11 centers in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2017. After case-matching, we compared cTME with pTME. The primary outcome was major postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included the rate of restorative procedures and 3-year oncological outcomes. In total 1069 patients were included, of which 35 underwent cTME. After matching (1:2 ratio), 29 cTME and 58 pTME were analyzed. No differences were found for major morbidity (27.6% vs 19.0%; P = 0.28) and abdominoperineal excision rate (31.0% vs 32.8%; P = 0.85) between cTME and pTME, respectively. Local recurrence (3.4% vs 8.6%; P = 0.43), systemic recurrence (3.4% vs 12.1%; P = 0.25), overall survival (93.1% vs 94.8%; P = 0.71), and disease-free survival (89.7% vs 81.0%; P = 0.43) were comparable between cTME and pTME. cTME is not associated with higher major morbidity, whereas the abdominoperineal excision rate and 3-year oncological outcomes are similar compared to pTME. Local excision as a diagnostic tool followed by completion surgery for early rectal cancer does not compromise outcomes and should still be considered as the treatment of early-stage rectal cancer.

FTP3.4 Robotic bladder-sparing exenterations for advanced rectal cancers - Short term outcomes

Abstract Introduction Pelvic exenterations are the standard of care for anterior urogenital invasion from advanced rectal cancers. In select cases, bladder preservation is possible. The present study aims to report the surgical and short-term oncological outcomes for the largest series of robotic bladder-sparing exenterations for locally-advanced rectal cancers. Methods Single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients that underwent robotic bladder-sparing exenterations for primary advanced rectal cancers between December 2019 and November 2022. Primary outcomes were major morbidity rate (≥ grade IIIA), R0 resections, and local recurrences. Results Sixteen patients underwent robotic bladder-sparing exenterations. The median hospital stay was 8.5 days and six patients (38%) experienced grade IIIA or more morbidity. There was no operative mortality. Five patients had a urinary leak; four from the bladder neck and one from the posterior wall of the bladder secondary to necrosis. A pathologically involved circumferential margin was observed in one patient and one patient had a local recurrence. Conclusions Robotic bladder-sparing exenterations are technically feasible for select locally-advanced rectal cancers with prostatic or urethral invasion. Operative morbidity is largely related to bladder neck leaks. Short-term oncological outcomes appear favourable in terms of R0 resections and local recurrence rates.

Risk Factors, Management, and Outcome of Gastric Venous Congestion After Total Pancreatectomy: An Underestimated Complication Requiring Standardized Identification, Grading, and Management

BackgroundGastric venous congestion (GVC) after total pancreatectomy (TP) is rarely studied despite its high 5% to 28% incidence and possible association with mortality. This study aimed to provide insight about incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome of GVC after TP.MethodsThis retrospective observational single-center study included all patients undergoing elective TP from 2008 to 2021. The exclusion criteria ruled out a history of gastric resection, concomitant (sub)total gastrectomy for oncologic indication(s) or celiac axis resection, and postoperative (sub)total gastrectomy for indication(s) other than GVC.ResultsThe study enrolled 268 patients. The in-hospital major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) rate was 28%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 3%. GVC was identified in 21% of patients, particularly occurring during index surgery (93%). Intraoperative GVC was managed with (sub)total gastrectomy for 55% of the patients. The major morbidity rate was higher for the patients with GVC (44% vs 24%; p = 0.003), whereas the 90-day mortality did not differ significantly (5% vs 3%; p = 0.406). The predictors for major morbidity were intraoperative GVC (odds ratio [OR], 2.207; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.142–4.268) and high TP volume (> 20 TPs/year: OR, 0.360; 95% CI, 0.175–0.738). The predictors for GVC were portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) (OR, 2.103; 95% CI, 1.034–4.278) and left coronary vein ligation (OR, 11.858; 95% CI, 5.772–24.362).ConclusionsAfter TP, GVC is rather common (in 1 of 5 patients). GVC during index surgery is predictive for major morbidity, although not translating into higher mortality. Left coronary vein ligation and PVR are predictive for GVC, requiring vigilance during and after surgery, although gastric resection is not always necessary. More evidence on prevention, identification, classification, and management of GVC is needed.

Comparison of neonatal outcomes between multiples and singletons among very low birth weight infants: the Korean Neonatal Network cohort study

Objective To compare neonatal outcomes between multiples and singletons among very low birth weight infants, this was a prospective cohort study that was conducted by collecting data registered in the Korean Neonatal Network database. Methods From January 2013 to December 2016, there were 8265 infants in the Korean Neonatal Network database, and 2958 of them were from multiples. Among them, 2636 infants were twins, 308 infants were triplets, and 14 infants were quadruplets. Maternal and neonatal variables including and mortality major morbidity were compared. Finally, the predicted rates of major morbidity between singletons and multiples. Results Multiples had higher gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 min, rates of cesarean section and artificial reproductive technology but lower maternal hypertension, oligohydramnios, chorioamnionitis rates and Clinical Risk Index for Babies scores II without base excess than the singletons. In univariate analysis, multiples had a lower incidence of respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and sepsis. The mortality rate was not significantly different for overall gestational ages except for those born at ≤26 weeks of gestation. In multivariate logistic analysis, the incidences of intraventricular hemorrhage (grade ≥3), and retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment were significantly higher than the singletons. Conclusions Mortality was not significantly different between multiples and singletons according to overall gestational age, except for multiples born at ≤26 weeks. A significant higher risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment was found in multiples. A new strategy to improve the mortality of immature multiples born at ≤26 weeks of gestation should be developed.

Objective assessment of physician work in infrainguinal arterial bypass surgery

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is obtain robust objective data from the Vascular Quality Initiative on physician work in infrainguinal artery bypass surgery. Operative time, patient comorbidities, anatomical complexity, consequences of adverse outcomes, and postoperative length of stay all factor into procedure relative value unit assignment and physician reimbursement. MethodsBaseline demographics and comorbidities were identified among 74,920 infrainguinal bypass surgeries in Vascular Quality Initiative between 2003 and 2022. Investigation into areas of progressive complexity over time was conducted. Bypasses were divided into 10 cohorts based on inflow and target arteries and conduit type. Mean operative times, lengths of stay, major morbidity rates, and 90-day mortality rates were identified across the various bypasses. Comparison of relative value unit per minute service time during the acute inpatient hospital admission was performed between the most 4 common bypasses and 14 commonly performed highly invasive major surgeries across several subdisciplines. ResultsPatients undergoing infrainguinal arterial bypass have an advanced combination of medical complexities highlighted by diabetes mellitus in 40%, hypertension in 88%, body mass index >30 in 30%, coronary artery disease that has clinically manifested in 31%, renal insufficiency in 19%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 27%, and prior lower extremity arterial intervention (endovascular and open combined) in >50%. The need for concomitant endarterectomy at the proximal anastomosis site of infrainguinal bypasses has increased over time (P < .001). The indication for bypass being limb-threatening ischemia as defined by ischemic rest pain, pedal tissue loss, or acute ischemia has also increased over time (P < .001), indicating more advanced extent of arterial occlusion in patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass. Finally, there has been a significant (P < .001) progression in the percentage of patients who have undergone a prior ipsilateral lower extremity endovascular intervention at the time of their bypass (increasing from 9.9% in 2003-2010 to 31.9% in the 2018-2022 eras). Among the 18 procedures investigated, the 4 most commonly performed infrainguinal bypasses were included in the analysis. These ranked 14th, 16th, 17th and 18th as the most poorly compensated per minute service time during the acute operative inpatient stay. ConclusionsInfrainguinal arterial bypass surgery has an objectively undervalued physician work relative value unit compared with other highly invasive major surgeries across several subdisciplines. There are elements of progressive complexity in infrainguinal bypass patients over the past 20 years among a patient cohort with a very high comorbidity rate, indicating escalating intensity for infrainguinal bypass.

How I do it: using a hammock mesh in the reconstruction of inguinal ligament during a wide en-bloc resection of a groin mesenchymal tumor.

In case of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), an en-bloc resection with safe margins is recommended. To ensure safe removal without tumor rupture, STS of the groin area, retroperitoneal or pelvic mesenchymal tumors may require incision or resection of the inguinal ligament. Solid reconstruction is mandatory to prevent early and late postoperative femoral hernias. We present here a new technique of inguinal ligament reconstruction. Between September 2020 and September 2022, patients undergoing incision and/or resection of inguinal ligaments during a wide en-bloc resection of STS of the groin area in the Department of General Surgery in Strasbourg were included. All patients had an inguinal ligament reconstruction with biosynthetic slowly resorbable mesh shaped as a hammock, pre- or intraperitoneally, associated or not with loco-regional pedicled muscular flaps. A total of 7 hammock mesh reconstructions were performed. One or several flaps were necessary in 57% of cases (4 patients): either for inguinal ligament reconstruction only (n = 1), for recovering of femoral vessels (n = 1), and for both ligament reconstruction and defect covering (n = 2). The major morbidity rate was 14.3% (n = 1), related to a thigh surgical site infection due to sartorius flap infarction. After a median follow-up of 17.8months (range 7-31), there was neither early nor late occurrence of post-operative femoral hernia. This is a new surgical tool for inguinal ligament reconstruction with the implementation of a biosynthetic slowly resorbable mesh shaped as a hammock, which should be compared to other techniques.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Short- and Long-Term Results.

Surgery and postoperative systemic chemotherapy represent the standard treatment for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) for hepatobiliary procedures has spread worldwide in the last two decades. Since resections for PHC are technically demanding, the role of MIS in this field is yet to be established. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC, to evaluate its safety and its surgical and oncological outcomes. A systematic literature review on PubMed and SCOPUS was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Overall, a total of 18 studies reporting 372 MIS procedures for PHC were included in our analysis. A progressive increase in the available literature was observed over the years. A total of 310 laparoscopic and 62 robotic resections were performed. A pooled analysis showed an operative time ranging from 205.3 ± 23.9 and 840 (770-890) minutes, and intraoperative bleeding between 101.1 ± 13.6 and 1360 ± 809 mL. Minor and major morbidity rates were 43.9% and 12.7%, respectively, with a 5.6% mortality rate. R0 resections were achieved in 80.6% of patients and the number of retrieved lymph nodes ranged between 4 (3-12) and 12 (8-16). This systematic review shows that MIS for PHC is feasible, with safe postoperative and oncological outcomes. Recent data has shown encouraging results and more reports are being published. Future studies should address differences between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Given the management and technical challenges, MIS for PHC should be performed by experienced surgeons, in high-volume centers, on selected patients.

Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic major hepatectomies

BackgroundData on the effect of body mass index on laparoscopic liver resections are conflicting. We performed this study to investigate the association between body mass index and postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic major hepatectomies. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 4,348 laparoscopic major hepatectomies at 58 centers between 2005 and 2021, of which 3,383 met the study inclusion criteria. Concomitant major operations, vascular resections, and previous liver resections were excluded. Associations between body mass index and perioperative outcomes were analyzed using restricted cubic splines. Modeled effect sizes were visually rendered and summarized. ResultsA total of 1,810 patients (53.5%) had normal weight, whereas 1,057 (31.2%) were overweight and 392 (11.6%) were obese. One hundred and twenty-four patients (3.6%) were underweight. Most perioperative outcomes showed a linear worsening trend with increasing body mass index. There was a statistically significant increase in open conversion rate (16.3%, 10.8%, 9.2%, and 5.6%, P < .001), longer operation time (320 vs 305 vs 300 and 266 minutes, P < .001), increasing blood loss (300 vs 300 vs 295 vs 250 mL, P = .022), and higher postoperative morbidity (33.4% vs 26.3% vs 25.0% vs 25.0%, P = .009) in obese, overweight, normal weight, and underweight patients, respectively (P < .001). However, postoperative major morbidity demonstrated a “U”-shaped association with body mass index, whereby the highest major morbidity rates were observed in underweight and obese patients. ConclusionLaparoscopic major hepatectomy was associated with poorer outcomes with increasing body mass index for most perioperative outcome measures.

High adherence to enhanced recovery pathway independently reduces major morbidity and mortality rates after colorectal surgery: a reappraisal of the iCral2 and iCral3 multicenter prospective studies

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) offers lower overall morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay after colorectal surgery (CRS); high adherence rates to ERAS may significantly reduce major morbidity (MM), anastomotic leakage (AL), and mortality (M) rates as well. Methods: Prospective enrollment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in two separate 18- and 12-month periods among 78 surgical centers in Italy from 2019 to 2021. Adherence to ERAS pathway items was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints (MM, AL, and M rates) were identified through logistic regression analyses, presenting odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: An institutional ERAS status was declared by 48 out of 78 (61.5%) participating centers. The median overall adherence to ERAS was 75%. Among 8,359 patients included in both studies, MM, AL, and M rates were 6.3%, 4.4%, and 1.0%, respectively. Several patient-related and treatment-related variables showed independently higher rates for primary endpoints: male gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class III, neoadjuvant treatment, perioperative steroids, intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions, length of the operation &gt;180’, surgery for malignancy. On the other hand, ERAS adherence &gt;85% independently reduced MM (OR, 0.91) and M (OR, 0.25) rates, whereas no mechanical bowel preparation independently reduced AL (OR, 0.68) rates. Conclusions: Among other patient- or treatment-related variables, ERAS adherence &gt;85% independently reduced MM and M rates, whereas no mechanical bowel preparation independently reduced AL rates after CRS.

Prognostic predictors for recurrence following curative resection in grade I/II pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) have an excellent long-term survival after resection, but are associated with a high recurrence rate. Identification of prognostic factors affecting recurrences would enable identifying subgroup of patients at higher risk of recurrences, who may benefit from more aggressive treatment. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with curative intent for grade I and II pNETs between July 2007 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analysed. A total of 68 resected patients of pNETs were included in this analysis. Fifty-two patients (76.47%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 (14.7%) patients had distal pancreatectomy, and 2 (2.9%) patients underwent median pancreatectomy, while enucleation was performed in 4 patients (5.8%). The overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) and mortality rates were 33.82% and 2.94%, respectively. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, 22 (32.35%) patients had disease recurrence. The 5-year overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 90.2% and 60.8%, respectively. While OS was unaffected by different prognostic factors, multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement, Ki-67 index ≥5%, and presence of perineural invasion (PNI) were independently associated with recurrence. While surgical resection gives excellent overall survival in grade I/II pNETs, lymph node positivity, higher Ki-67 index, and PNI are associated with a high risk for recurrence. Patients with these characteristics should be stratified as high risk and evaluated for more intensive follow-up and aggressive treatment strategies in future prospective studies.