Instrumental Delivery Rate Research Articles

Impact of epidural analgesia on outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

To assess the association between Epidural Analgesia (EA) during Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) and delivery mode (spontaneous or instrumental vaginal delivery). Secondary objectives include maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, all women who underwent a VBAC with and without EA, between the years 1996-2016 at the Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) were included. Women who delivered by cesarean section (elective and non-elective) and those who gave birth to a newborn with chromosomal abnormalities or major malformations, and multifetal gestations were excluded. Demographical, clinical, and obstetrical characteristics were recorded, and pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was the type of delivery. Univariate analysis was followed by a multivariate analysis to control for confounders. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. During the study period, 17,516 women who have had a previous CS met the inclusion criteria, of which 15% (n = 2652) used EA during labor, while the rest of the cohort 85% (n = 14,864) were non-EA users. Women in the EA group had higher rates of instrumental delivery and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) as well as higher rates of oxytocin augmentation and a longer second stage of labor. The use of EA was found to be an independent risk factor for instrumental delivery after controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, DM (diabetes mellitus), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, oxytocin augmentation, prolonged second stage of labor, induction of labor, fertility treatments and oligohydramnios. However, no significant differences were observed regarding neonatal outcomes including perinatal mortality, birth weight, Apgar scores and shoulder dystocia rates. EA for women undergoing a VBAC was associated with higher rates of instrumental delivery and PPH, oxytocin augmentation and a longer second stage of labor compared with women without EA. However, neonatal outcomes did not differ between the groups.

Factors contributing to visual intrapartum cardiotocograph interpretation variation among healthcare professionals: An integrative review.

The reliability of cardiotocographs as diagnostic tools for fetal well-being is hampered by interpretational variations among healthcare professionals, contributing to high rates of cesarean sections and instrumental deliveries. While adjunct technologies may be used to confirm cases of fetal distress, those in resource constrained areas continue to rely on visual cardiotocograph interpretation to come up with the diagnosis of fetal hypoxia. This study investigated the factors contributing to variations in the visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograph among healthcare professionals in the absence of adjunctive technologies. In this integrative literature review, we conducted a literature search of the following electronic databases: EBScohost, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The following search terms and Boolean operators were used: (Intrapartum OR Labor OR Labour OR Childbirth OR Birth OR Delivery) AND (Cardiotocography OR CTG OR "Electronic Fetal Monitoring" OR EFM) AND (Interpretation OR Analysis) AND (Variations OR Differences) AND ("Healthcare Workers" OR Nurses OR "Medical Workers" OR "Healthcare Professionals" OR Midwives OR Obstetricians). After removal of duplicates, a total of 1481 articles and titles were screened, 60 full-text articles were examined to verify whether they addressed the scope of the literature review. Nine articles addressed the factors contributing to variations in the visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs among healthcare professionals. The quality of the studies was appraised using the Quality Appraisal Tool for Studies of Diagnostic Reliability. Thematic analysis identified the following themes: 1) Interpretational variations in cardiotocograph characteristics among health professionals, and 2) factors leading to increased interpretational variation among healthcare professionals. Our results highlight the need for increased cardiotocograph training to improve consistency among health professionals, especially for suspicious and pathological traces, which often lead to cesarean section.

Impact of screening for large-for-gestational-age fetuses on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective observational study.

Debates on the management of macrosomia are still current. We have to consider the consequences of screening to contribute to these discussions. Our aim is to study the consequences of the 3rd trimester fetal macrosomia screening protocols used in several centres in the same French region in order to determine whether this screening affects maternal and neonatal outcomes: mode of delivery, maternal complications (haemorrhage, perineal lesions), neonatal health (pH, Apgar score) and the occurrence of neonatal trauma during delivery. Prospective observational, multicenter cohort study (Reims, Châlons en Champagne and Charleville-Mézières hospitals). All women with low-risk pregnancies who could benefit from screening for fetal macrosomia were included. Neonatal macrosomia was defined as a weight above the 90th percentile according to AUDIPOG adjusted growth curves. The principal outcome was the cesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes were instrumental deliveries and maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. 2,217 women were included. Rates of cesarean section and instrumental delivery were higher if macrosomia had been screened, whether rightly, in large-for-gestational-age newborns (respectively 9,802 [1.638-190.290], p=0.038 and 3,021 [1.099-8.846], p=0.036) or wrongly, in newborns who were ultimately appropriate-for-date (respectively ORa 3.562 [1.377-10.128], p=0.01 and 3.042 [1.139-8.596], p=0.36). This screening did not reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Screening for fetal macrosomia may be associated with increased rates of cesarean section and instrumental delivery for large-for-gestational-age and appropriate-for-date newborns. These results do not show any impact of these variations on maternal or neonatal health, and do not allow us to change practices directly. They do, however, alert us to the consequences of widespread screening for LGA and its possible side effects, which could be better targeted to high-risk populations or improved according to other criteria.

Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcome in Kurdish, Somali and general population in Finland

Abstract Gestational diabetes (GDM) increases the risk of type II diabetes and cardiovascular morbidity later in life but GDM incidence in women from different cultural backgrounds varies. This study aims to examine treatment of GDM and pregnancy outcomes in Somali, Kurdish and general population women. Patient data of 312 Kurdish, 254 Somali and 508 general population women was collected from Turku University Hospital records from 2008 to 2019. The general population was selected by randomization with matching year, BMI, age, and parity. Singleton deliveries after 34th gestational week with no prior diabetes mellitus were included. Descriptive and comparison analyses (SPSS, version 29.0) were used to identify associations between ethnic background and pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM. The incidence of GDM was 22 % (CI 95 % 17-27) in Somali, 36 % (CI 95 % 31-42) in Kurdish, and 16 % (CI 95 % 13-19) in the general population women. Kurdish women had medication for GDM more often (43 % CI 95 % 34-53) than the Somali (22 % CI 95 % 11-33) and general population women (18 % CI 95 % 9-26). Metformin was more commonly used among Kurdish (30 % CI 95 % 22-39) compared to the general population (12 % CI 95 % 4-18) and Somali women (13 % CI 95 % 4-22). There was no difference in insulin or combined metformin and insulin treatment between the groups. In GDM group, vaginal deliveries were more common in general population (89 % CI % 81-95) than in Somali women (67 % CI % 64-81). Induction of labour (indication GDM or other) and instrumental vaginal delivery rates were similar between the groups. Newborns of all Somali women had a lower weight (SD -0.3 CI 95 % -0.7 - -0.2) compared to the general population (SD 0 CI 95 % -0.1 - 0.3). The prevalence of GDM was increased and dietary treatment decreased in Kurdish women compared to the general population in Finland. In the future, the treatment of GDM should be adjusted to better optimize the care for different cultural background women. Key messages • Kurdish women have increased incidence of GDM and less dietary treatment compared to the general population with similar risk factors. The pregnancy outcomes remain good in all groups. • With Somali women, the birth weight of the child is lower despite GDM status. This might direct clinicians to underestimate the effect of GDM when considering individual treatment.

Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial.

Our objective was to compare the performance of the first vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 h after amniotomy following Foley ripening in nulliparous labor induction. A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2021 to January 2022. 210 nulliparas at term for labor induction were randomized: 105 each to first vaginal examination at 8 or 4 h after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to expedite labor. Primary outcomes were the amniotomy-to-delivery interval (non-inferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction with their allocated labor care (superiority hypothesis) within 24 h after delivery. Analyses performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test as appropriate. The amniotomy-to-delivery interval was mean ± standard deviation 8.7 ± 3.4 vs 8.4 ± 3.7, mean difference 0.4 (97.5% CI: -0.7 to 1.5) hours, p = 0.442 within the pre-specified 2-hour non-inferiority margin, and maternal satisfaction score with allocated labor care was median [interquartile range] 8[7.5-10] vs 8[7.0-10], p = 0.248 for 8 vs 4 h arms, respectively. The amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals was 5.9 ± 2.3 vs 3.6 ± 1.0 h, p < 0.001, and the number of vaginal examinations was 2[1-2.5] vs 3 [2, 3], p < 0.001 for 8 vs 4 h, respectively. The first vaginal examination was less likely to have been performed as scheduled, more likely to be indicated by the urge to bear down, and non-reassuring cardiotocography for the 8 h arm (p < 0.001). Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely and instrumental vaginal delivery less likely, but cesarean rate was not significantly different for the 8 h arm (p = 0.017). A routine first vaginal examination at 8 h compared to 4 h is non-inferior for the time to birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction although the number of vaginal examinations is fewer. The increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery and reduction in instrumental vaginal delivery rates warrant further powered primary evaluation.

High-Dose versus Low-Dose Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background/Objectives: Although oxytocin administration is recommended for delayed labor progress, there is no consensus over the preferred optimal dose of oxytocin. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes comparing high-dose versus low-dose oxytocin regimens for augmentation of delayed labor. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing high-dose with low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation from inception up to May 2023. The outcomes assessed were cesarean rate, instrumental delivery rate, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal death, and uterine tachysystole. Subgroup analysis was performed with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, and a random-risk effect was used if I2 > 50%. Results: Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, and eighteen were RCTs. A total of 14.834 patients were included, of whom 7.921 (53.3%) received high-dose and 6.913 (46.6%) received low-dose oxytocin during labor augmentation. No statistical differences were found in cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, postpartum hemorrhage and vaginal instrumentation rate. However, uterine tachysystole incidence was significantly higher with high-dose oxytocin (95% Cl, 1.30-1.94, p = 0.3; 0.6; I2 = 9%). Conclusions: Labor augmentation with a low-dose oxytocin regimen is effective as with a high-dose regimen, but with significantly less uterine tachysystole events, which can lead to intrauterine and neonatal complications. Our findings suggest that a low-dose regimen may be safe and effective for labor augmentation in medical practice.

Status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services and the impact of midwife staffing on birth outcomes in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

ObjectiveTo investigate the status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services in China and to identify the association between midwife staffing and childbirth outcomes.DesignA descriptive, multicentre cross-sectional survey.SettingMaternity hospitals from...

Time matters: Cervical ripening balloon for 6 versus 12 h-Retrospective comparison between two protocols.

Recently, two randomized controlled trials compared removal of cervical ripening balloon (CRB) after 6 versus 12 h. Their results showed similar Bishop score changes in both groups and a shorter time to delivery in the 6-h group. Neither of the studies was powered to show difference in mode of delivery. The aim of this study was to compare mode of delivery when the CRB was removed after 6 versus 12 h. A historical control study comparing induction of labor with a CRB between two time periods, one in which the CRB was removed after 12 h (12-h group), and the other in which it was removed after 6 h (6-h group). We included term pregnancies with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We excluded patients with a previous cesarean delivery, failed ripening with prostaglandins prior to CRB insertion, and any contraindication for vaginal delivery. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery within 24 h and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. We included 1704 patients, 914 in the 12-h group, and 717 in the 6-h group. Removal after 6 h was associated with a lower rate of cesarean and instrumental deliveries (28.6% vs 22.5%, and 12% vs 6.2%, respectively) and a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h. All differences were statistically significant. Removing a cervical ripening balloon after 6 rather than 12 h is associated with reduced cesarean and instrumental delivery rates, and should be considered as a reasonable, and potentially superior alternative in labor induction protocols with intracervical ripening balloon.

Évolution du taux d’épisiotomies et des lésions obstétricales du sphincter de l’anus depuis les recommandations de 2018

ObjectivesThere is a progressive reduction in the rate of episiotomies since the recommendations of the French college of gynaecologists. Our objective was to study the evolution of the rate of episiotomies and Obstetric Anus Sphincter Injury (OASI) since the restriction of episiotomies in our department. MethodsObservational monocentric retrospective study performed at the Rouen University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were monofetal pregnancies, delivery at a term greater than or equal to 37 weeks of amenorrhea of a living, viable child and by cephalic presentation. We compared two periods corresponding to before and after the 2018 recommendations. We used logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with the risk of episiotomies and of obstetrical anal injuries, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. ResultsWe included 3329 patients for the 1st period and 3492 for the 2nd period, and the rate of instrumental deliveries were respectively of 16.4% (n=547) and 17.9% (n=626). Multivariate analysis showed a significant decrease in the rate of episiotomies in the 2nd period (OR 0.14, CI 95% [0.12; 0.16], P<0.0001). Main factors associated with the risk of OASI were primiparity (OR 6.21, CI 95% [3.19; 12.11]) and the use of forceps (OR 4.23, CI 95% [2.17; 8.27]) overall; and instrumental delivery using forceps (OR 3.25, CI 95% [1.69; 6.22]) and delivery during the 2nd period (OR 1.98, CI 95% [1.01; 3.88]) in case of instrumental delivery. ConclusionsOur study confirms that the voluntary reduction in the episiotomy rate does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of OASI, overall and in case of instrumental delivery. However, we show an increase in the rate of OASI in case of instrumental delivery since the latest recommendations.

Does the timing of neuraxial analgesia initiation in elective induction of multiparous women prolong the duration of delivery?

To investigate whether the early initiation of neuraxial analgesia prolongs the duration of electively induced labor in Japanese multiparous women. This retrospective study included multiparous term women who underwent elective induction of labor using combined spinal-epidural analgesia at the Showa University Hospital between October 2018 and March 2021. The participants were divided into two groups: early and late. If neuraxial analgesia was initiated when the cervical dilation was ≤3 cm, the patient was included in the early group. The remaining patients were included in the late group. The obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the duration of delivery. The secondary outcomes were the rates of instrumental and cesarean deliveries. Two hundred and ninety-seven women (early group = 139, late group = 158) were included in the analysis. The duration of the first stage of labor did not differ significantly between the early and late groups (median: 232 vs. 260 min, p = 0.35). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage (37 vs. 40 min, p = 0.20). Moreover, the rates of instrumental and cesarean deliveries did not differ significantly between the groups, and the neonatal outcomes were comparable. Early initiation of neuraxial analgesia in the elective induction of parous Japanese women did not prolong the duration of delivery. Our results suggest that neuraxial analgesia may be initiated whenever a parturient desires it.

Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes following Ovulation Induction and Unassisted Pregnancies in the Same Mother.

We aimed to assess whether ovulation induction treatments affect obstetric and neonatal outcomes. This was a historic cohort study of deliveries in a single university-affiliated medical center between November 2008 and January 2020. We included women who had one pregnancy following ovulation induction and one unassisted pregnancy. The obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared between pregnancies following ovulation induction and unassisted pregnancies, so that each woman served as her own control. The primary outcome measure was birth weight. A total of 193 deliveries following ovulation induction and 193 deliveries after unassisted conception by the same women were compared. Ovulation induction pregnancies were characterized by a significantly younger maternal age and a higher rate of nulliparity (62.7 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001). In pregnancies achieved by ovulation induction, we found a higher rate of preterm birth (8.3 vs. 4.1%, p = 0.02) and instrumental deliveries (8.8 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.005), while cesarean delivery rates were higher following unassisted pregnancies. Birth weight was significantly lower in ovulation induction pregnancies (3,167 ± 436 vs. 3,251 ± 460 g, p = 0.009), although the rate of small for gestational age neonates was similar between the groups. On multivariate analysis, birth weight remained significantly associated with ovulation induction after adjustment for confounders, while preterm birth did not. Pregnancies following ovulation induction treatments are associated with lower birth weight. This may be related to an altered placentation process following uterine exposure to supraphysiological hormonal levels. · Ovulation induction entails lower birthweight.. · This may relate to supraphysiological hormonal levels.. · Monitoring fetal growth is advised in such cases..

Est-il possible de réduire en sécurité l’utilisation du pH in utero en salle de naissance ? Analyse des pratiques

ObjectiveTo evaluate our clinical practices since the implementation of different tools to reduce the use of pH in utero (pHiu) in the delivery room. MethodsA single-centre retrospective study was conducted in our university maternity hospital of Lille from October 2016 to March 2021. All patients in labour with a vaginal delivery agreement, a fetus in cephalic presentation and no contraindication to perform a pHiu were included. Since 2019, team training in fetal heart rate interpretation and a change in birth room practices with the introduction of fetal scalp pacing have been implemented to reduce the use of pH in utero. In order to evaluate the impact on clinical practices, the rate of pHiu, the number of pHiu performed per patient, the rates of instrumental deliveries, caesarean sections and pH at birth below 7.0 were studied and compared over time. ResultsIn total, 1515 patients had one or more pHiu during our study period, i.e. 7.3% (1515/20,562). The rate of pHiu decreased significantly from 2016 to 2021: in 2016, 12.1% (142/1171) of our sample had a pHiu during their labour, compared to 3.4% (33/963) in 2021. pH < 7.0 remained stable, ranging from 1.6 to 2.2%. Similarly, the rates of instrumental deliveries and caesarean sections remained stable, ranging from 17.7% to 21% and from 9.8% to 11.6%, respectively. ConclusionImproved knowledge of fetal physiology, awareness of teams of the limits of pHiu and introduction of fetal scalp stimulation have led to a decrease in the number of pHiu, without an increase in the rates of neonatal acidosis, instrumental deliveries and caesarean sections.

Trends in instrument preference for operative vaginal delivery in a tertiary referral center: 2008-2021.

To examine temporal trends in operative vaginal deliveries as well as the ratio between vacuum and forceps deliveries over 15 years in a large tertiary hospital. This retrospective study assessed prospectively collected data from 2008 to 2021. Women with greater than 37 weeks of gestation who underwent an operative vaginal delivery were included. The rate and ratio of instrumental deliveries and perineal trauma were recorded. From 2008 to 2021 there was a total of 109 230 term deliveries, of which 20 151 were an operative vaginal delivery. The rate of operative vaginal delivery as a proportion of all term deliveries decreased from 21.9% (1547 of 7069) in 2008 to 17.1% in 2021 (1428 of 8338, P< 0.001). The ratio between vacuum and forceps-assisted deliveries decreased significantly over the study period, from 7.06 in 2008 to 2.39 in 2021 (P< 0.001). Perineal trauma remained unchanged during the study period. Operative vaginal delivery rates declined over the 15-year study period. While vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries remain the favored instrument, forceps-assisted deliveries are becoming more prevalent. The cause for this change in practice is unclear but is likely multifactorial.

Mode of delivery and birth outcomes in relation to the duration of the passive second stage of labour: A retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women.

To investigate the mode of delivery and birth outcomes in relation to the duration of the passive second stage of labour in nulliparous women. A retrospective cohort study of all nulliparous women (n = 1131) at two delivery units in Sweden. Maternal and obstetric data were obtained from electronic medical records during 2019. The passive second stage was defined as the complete dilation of the cervix until the start of the active second stage. The duration of the passive second stage was categorized into three groups: 0 to 119 min (0 to <2 h), 120-239 min (2- <4h) and ≥240 min (≥4h). Differences between the groups were examined using t-test and Chi2-tests and regression analyses were used to analyse adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was mode of delivery in relation to the duration of the passive second stage and the secondary outcomes covered a series of adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes. The rates of instrumental and caesarean deliveries increased as the duration of the passive second stage increased. A ≥4-hour duration of the passive second stage was associated with a nine-times increased risk of caesarean section, and a four-times risk of instrumental delivery compared to a duration of <2 hours in the adjusted analyses. No differences were found in the maternal birth outcomes. The risk of a 5-minute Apgar score <7 was increased in the 2-<4h group. A longer passive second stage was not associated with an increased risk of negative birth experience. Our study demonstrates an increased risk of operative delivery for a longer duration (>2h) of the passive second stage in nulliparous women, although most of the women gave birth by spontaneous vaginal delivery even after ≥4 hours. There was no evidence of an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes in a longer duration of the passive second stage but there were indications of increased adverse neonatal outcomes. Assessment of fetal well-being is important when the duration of the passive phase is prolonged.

Https://thejmch.com/index.php?journal=thejmch&amp;page=issue&amp;op=view&amp;path%5B%5D=41

Background: Good antenatal care helps a woman face labour in good health and optimum conditions. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and WHO guidelines suggest 15 visits in the whole pregnancy. Keeping in view the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the exposure of pregnant ladies the number of antenatal visits was reduced to 7 milestone visits and outcome was noted. This study aimed to do a comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in antenatal cases at our centre using standard WHO protocol vs. revised antenatal protocol during COVID-19 pandemic. Subjects and Method: This was an observational study done at a tertiary care center of an Armed forces hospital with target population as pregnant ladies attending antenatal care Out patient department of the hospital during COVID19 pandemic Vs Antenatal cases in previous 1 year. A comparative analysis of pregnancy outcome, maternal variables during pregnancy and delivery along with neonatal variables was done. Results: There were lesser deliveries by 41.7% as compared to non-COVID times. There was an increase in the caesarean delivery rate and instrumental delivery rate during COVID times by 11% and 53% respectively. There was increase in Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) by 26.6%. The incidence of fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, maternal anaemia and gestational diabetes mellitus, oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios was low. The incidence of spontaneous abortions was also low in our study. In contrast, the incidence of pre-term deliveries doubled from 7.4% to 13.4%. Neonatal morbidity and mortality indicators like Neonatal Intensive care unit (NICU) admissions showed a rising trend of 1.7% during the COVID (14.6% to 16.3%) with a minimal rise in early neonatal deaths by 0.2%. Conclusion: Our model doesn't show an increase in maternal, neonatal morbidity, and mortality. This model can be used as a standard of care for Antenatal patients during Pandemics. It reduces the risk exposure of the gravid mother without any significant increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Keywords: antenatal care, COVID-19 pandemic, revised antenatal schedule. Correspondence: Dr Vipin Kumar Prajapati, Graded Specialist Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, AFMC, Pune. E Mail: vipinafmc@gmail.com. Contact No: 8811015130. Journal of Maternal and Child Health (2023), 08(01): 125-133 https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2023.08.01.12

Predictors of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes of instrumental vaginal delivery at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A cross‐sectional study

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and the predictors of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes associated with it in an Ethiopian setting.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted from October 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019, at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Data on obstetric characteristics, perinatal and maternal outcomes of women who delivered through IVD were collected prospectively, using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 and descriptive analysis was applied to analyze baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to predict the association between short‐term complications of IVD and their determinants. Odds ratio, 95% CI, and p‐value &lt; 0.05 were used to present significance of study findings.ResultsThere were 3165 deliveries during the study period, out of which 241 (7.6%) were instrumental vaginal deliveries. Sequential use of instrumental delivery (AOR = 4.82 [95% CI = 2.10–27.29] and AOR = 6.43 [95% CI = 1.19–34.73], for maternal and fetal complications, respectively) was associated with increased both maternal and fetal complications. Three number of pulls during the extraction was associated with increased fetal complications (AOR = 1.19 [95% CI = 1.05–1.67]).ConclusionThe rate of instrumental delivery rate in our setting is high with sequential use of instrumental delivery found to be associated with increased adverse maternal and fetal outcomes while three number of pulls were associated with increased fetal adverse outcomes.

Results of the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey and trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France since 1995

To report results of the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey (ENP) in metropolitan France and assess trends in the main indicators of perinatal health, medical practices, and risk factors in France since 1995. All the samples included all women giving birth at a gestational age of at least 22 weeks of gestation and/or to an infant weighing at least 500 grams in all maternity units in metropolitan France during one week in 1995 (N=13048), 2003 (N=14324), 2010 (N=14546), 2016 (N=12553), and 2021 (N=12088). The data came from postpartum interviews of the women at the hospital and their medical records. Comparisons between surveys showed trends over time. Between 1995 and 2021, maternal characteristics changed. Maternal age and the frequency of women with obesity rose: in 2021, 24.6% of women were 35 years or older (21.1% in 2016, 19.2% in 2010, 15.9% in 2003 and 12.4% in 1995) and 14.4% were obese (11.8% in 2016, 9.9% in 2010 and 7.4% in 2003). Some antenatal prevention behaviors that improved in 2021 were not smoking during the third trimester, acid folic administration before pregnancy, and vaccination against influenza. The percentage of women with an early prenatal appointment ("4th month appointment"), implemented to facilitate screening of maternal vulnerability during pregnancy, has continued to rise. The percentage of women receiving prenatal care by midwives has risen markedly (39.0% in 2021 versus 11.7% in 2016). Serum screening for Down syndrome continues to increase (91.8% of women in 2021). The rate of induction of labor has risen significantly (20.2% in 1995 and 25.8% in 2021). The mode of delivery has not varied significantly since 2003; in 2021, the cesarean rate was 21.4% and the instrumental vaginal delivery rate 12.4%. Episiotomy was increasingly rare, among both primiparous and multiparous women (16.5% and 2.9% in 2021, respectively). The prevalence of coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) infection during pregnancy was 5.7%. Preterm live births increased regularly, slightly but significantly over the 1995-2016 period and then remained stable between 2016 and 2021 (7.0%). In 2021, 56.3% of women exclusively breastfed during their hospital stay, a modest increase in comparison with 2016 (54.6%). Routine national perinatal surveys highlight positive trends over time in some preventive practices, decreases in some medical interventions consistent with national guidelines, and the increasing role of midwives in prenatal care. Nonetheless, some indicators remain less than optimal and require more detailed analyses.

Induction of labour with misoprostol in premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks: Which route is better and at what dose a randomized control trial in a tertiary care hospital

Background: The idea of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different routes of administration of misoprostol - 50µg oral, 25µg vaginal and 50µg sublingual for induction of labour in women with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.Design: Randomized controlled trial.Sample: A total of 252 women with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation with indications of induction of labour.Methods: Study was conducted from 01/02/2022 to 31/11/2022, Women admitted to ward with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) after 34 weeks of gestation and requiring induction of labour were randomized into three groups. A total of 252 women participated in the study and were assigned to three groups to receive either 50µg oral misoprostol (n=82) or 25µg vaginal misoprostol (n=85) or 50µg sublingual misoprostol (n=85). The doses were repeated 4 hourly till active labour was established or up to a maximum of 4 doses.Major outcomes: 1.Induction to active labour 2.induction to delivery intervals 3.Delivery modes and 4.fetal outcomes were noted.Results: The mean induction to active labour interval was not significantly different in the three groups (oral vs vaginal vs sublingual- 7.54±4.8 vs 7.77±4.1 h vs 7.68±5.1 h; p=0.92). There was no significant difference in the induction to delivery time interval among the three misoprostol groups (oral vs vaginal vs sublingual – 10.7± 5.5 h vs 11.2±5.0 h vs 11.2±6.4 h; p= 0.88). Spontaneous vaginal delivery rate, instrumental delivery rate and lower segment caesarean section rates were comparable among the three groups. The spontaneous vaginal delivery is more in vaginal group and least in the sublingual group. The oral group is almost equal to the sublingual group in spontaneous delivery. The number of neonates with APGAR score <7 (low APGAR) at 1 minute of birth was highest in sublingual group and lowest in vaginal group which was statistically significant (oral vs vaginal vs sublingual, 16.8% vs 9.4% vs 20%; p= 0. 04). APGAR score <7 at 5 minutes was not significantly different among the three groups (oral vs vaginal vs sublingual, 6.02% vs 3.5% vs 7.05%; p=0.2). This implies that the need for immediate resuscitation was more in the sublingual group. Neonatal intensive care admission was least in the vaginal group although the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: 50µg oral misoprostol, 25µg vaginal misoprostol or 50µg sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour after 34 weeks of gestation have equal efficacy for induction of labour in women with spontaneous vaginal delivery is highest in vaginal route. The spontaneous vaginal delivery is more in vaginal route. The sublingual route having slightly higher incidence of low APGAR scores at one minute for the neonate.

Low Gestational Weight Gain in Women With Gestational Diabetes Is Safe With Better Metabolic Profile Postpartum.

More data are needed on the potential benefits and risks of gestational weight gain (GWG) less than recommended and excessive GWG in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) compared to women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) during pregnancy. This work aimed to evaluate association of gestational weight gain (GWG) as low, within, or above (excessive) according to Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines, with pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT). This prospective cohort study included 7 Belgian hospitals and 1843 women receiving universal GDM screening with a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Pregnancy outcomes and postpartum characteristics were the main outcome measures. Women with GDM and low GWG (n = 97, 52.4%) had similar rates of small-for-gestational age infants and preterm delivery, were less often overweight or obese postpartum (35.7% [30] vs 56.5% [26]; P < .022) and less often had postpartum weight retention (PPWR) (48.8% [41] vs 87.9% [40]; P < .001) compared to GWG within range (n = 58, 31.3%). GDM with excessive GWG (n = 30, 16.2%) more often had neonatal hypoglycemia (30.8% (8) vs 5.9% [3], aOR 7.15; 95% CI, 1.52-33.63; P = .013) compared to GWG within range. NGT with excessive GWG (28.3% [383]) more often had instrumental delivery (15.9% [61] vs 11.9% [64], aOR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.03-2.27; P = .035) and more large-for-gestational age infants (19.3% [74] vs 10.4% [56], aOR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.13-2.47; P = .012) compared to GWG within range. GWG below IOM guidelines occurred frequently in GDM women, without increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and with better metabolic profile postpartum. Excessive GWG was associated with increased risk for neonatal hypoglycemia and worse metabolic profile postpartum in women with GDM, and with higher rates of LGA and instrumental delivery in NGT women.

Assessment of Impact of Regional Analgesia on Labor and Neonates in Hilla City

Background: Epidural is the most effective form of pain relief in labor with around 30% of laboring women in the UK and 60% in the USA receiving epidural analgesia. Objectives: To assess effect of regional analgesia on labor pain, duration, outcome of delivery and neonates. Materials and Methods: Case control study included 400 pregnant woman 200 of them delivered by painless labour and other 200 whose delivered without analgesia who attended to the babylon maternity and pediatric hospital, Al sadiq hospital and private hospitals in al hilla city which included private Teiba, Al Fayhaa hospitals from first of february 2022 to June 2022. Results: The duration of first stage of labor was significantly prolonged at control mothers 26%(52) in compare to 10%(20) of mothers with epidural anesthesia had prolonged labor. While second stage shown no significant association with epidural anesthesia (P = 0.47). Fetal heart rate abnormalities shown no significant association with epidural analgesia (P = 0.96). While back pain and headache was significantly higher in mothers with epidural analgesia (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: EA was not associated with a higher instrumental delivery rate and higher rate of c/s, EA not cause significant maternal or neonatal complications in primi- and multiparas. Importantly, EA associated with short first stage of labor and not higher rate effect on duration of second stage of labour.