This review updates the rates of male and female victimization and perpetration in intimate relationships, building on the comprehensive reviews conducted by Desmarais et al. (2012a,b) over a decade ago. Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a serious social, public health, and criminological issue in many countries worldwide. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022 has exacerbated the matter further. Using a methodology similar to the 2012 reviews, this review reexamined the prevalence of male and female physical IPV in industrialized, English-speaking countries over the past 10 years. We also investigated whether study characteristics affected prevalence rates. In addition, our review compared IPV rates from 2000 to 2010 (Desmarais et al., 2012a, b) with those from 2011 to 2022 (this review). Literature searches were extended to nine databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Academic Search Premier. We included 246 articles reporting 517 rates of physical IPV victimization and/or perpetration. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n= 162, 65.9%) and used a Conflict Tactics Scale-based measurement tool (n= 158, 64.2%). Across studies, approximately one in seven women (14.6%) and one in eight men (11.8%) experienced IPV victimization, with an overall prevalence of 13.9%. While the gender gap in victimization between men and women has narrowed slightly over time (from 3.8 percentage points to 3.0 percentage points), there has been a remarkable 38% decrease in victimization rates compared with those found in the study by Desmarais et al. (2012a), which were 23.1% for women and 19.3% for men, with an overall pooled prevalence estimate of 22.4%. Conversely, we found that approximately one in six women (17.5%) and one in nine men (10.6%) had perpetrated physical IPV, with an overall prevalence of 12.9%. Consistent with previous reviews, pooled prevalence was slightly greater for female- compared with male-perpetrated physical IPV. The gender gap in IPV perpetration has narrowed slightly from 6.7 percentage points in the study by Desmarais et al. (2012b) to 4.9 percentage points in the current review. Additionally, there has been a substantial 48% decline in perpetration rates, including a 51% decline for men and a 45% decline for women, compared with the results of Desmarais et al. (2012b), which reported 28.3% for women and 21.6% for men, with an overall pooled prevalence estimate of 24.8%. Our findings indicate a notable improvement in addressing IPV in industrialized, English-speaking countries over the past 10 years, which is consistent with other studies. However, there remains a continuing need to address and prevent IPV using evidence-informed approaches that support all perpetrators and victims, regardless of gender.
Read full abstract