Physician Ratings Research Articles

Professional identity and its associated psychosocial factors among physicians from standardized residency training programs in China: a national cross-sectional study.

Shortage and high turnover intention rate of physicians are concerning problems in China. Professional identity has been shown as an influential factor for physicians' turnover intention. Enhancing physicians' professional identity in their early phase of career, standardized residency training program (SRTP), may help reduce the turnover rate. This study aimed to investigate the current status of professional identity and explore its associated psychosocial factors among Chinese SRTP trainees, hoping to provide evidence in strengthening the available medical human resources in China. The final sample was comprised of 2,267 Chinese SRTP trainees in this cross-sectional survey conducted from 9 March to 20 March in 2023. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Bivariate analyses and hierarchical multiple linear regression were used to analyze potential associated factors of Chinese SRTP trainees' professional identity. The average score of respondents' professional identity was 47.68 (standard deviation, SD = 8.61). Results from hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis showed that being married (β = 0.066, p < 0.01), having work experience before SRTP (β = 0.036, p < 0.05), being satisfied with annual income (β = 0.062, p < 0.01), psychological distress (β = -0.144, p < 0.001), depersonalization (β = -0.053, p < 0.05), emotional exhaustion (β = -0.380, p < 0.001) and resilience (β = 0.169, p < 0.001) were associated with professional identity (F = 114.301, p < 0.001). All associated factors can explain 41.1% of the variance in professional identity, and individual psychological variables make up a substantial portion (28.6%) of this influence. Individual psychological variables are strongly associated with professional identity. Helping SRTP trainees reduce psychological distress, alleviate burnout and enhance resilience may be effective ways to promote the formation of their professional identity.

Knowledge and engagement in research activities by medical students: challenges and new opportunities - an institutional survey.

Objectives: to describe participation and knowledge in research programs by medical students from Oswaldo Aranha University Center (Centro Universitário Fundação Osvaldo Aranha, UNIFOA). Methods: it was applied a survey during 2nd Symposium on Clinical Research - focusing on oncology in the South of the State of Rio de Janeiro. The survey was answered by medical students from UNIFOA, encompassing socio-demographic variables, and clinical issues. Results: 73 participants answered the survey, 64.4% (47/73) of them registered up to 3rd semester. Regarding participation in academic research project, 79.5% (67/73) didn’t have any participation, more than fifty per cent 56.2% (41/73), tried to participate in a project, but only 23.3% (17/73) got success in this initiative. Concerning general knowledge in clinical research, 80.8% (59/73) affirmed not had any contact with theme up to moment in their graduation course. Questions evaluating knowledge in basic concepts, described that only 50.7% (37/73) of the students know the difference between basic and clinical research, and only 45.2% (33/73) know the steps of approval process involving medical procedures. Conclusion: low engagement of medical students in research activities might explain the low rate of physicians working on this area. Their potential interest should be enabled by medical schools to increase qualified human resources which will accelerate Brazilian participation in clinical trials.

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging neurography assessment of diagnostic criteria in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome using electrophysiological tests as gold standard: A prospective study.

Evaluating peripheral neuropathy mainly relies on physical examination, patient history, and electrophysiological studies. High-resolution ultrasound is a fast, noninvasive modality for dynamic nerve assessment that enables the length of the nerve to be examined. Magnetic resonance imaging is preferred for examining deeper nerves with a high contrast resolution; its use shows excellent benefit in patients with atypical presentation, equivocal diagnosis, suspected secondary causes, and postsurgical relapse. We aimed to assess the measurements and criteria for both ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, based mainly on the three measurements assessed by Buchberger et al. This prospective study was conducted to test diagnostic accuracy. Thirty-two patients who presented clinically with, and were diagnosed by electrophysiological tests as having, carpal tunnel syndrome participated. Superficial ultrasound of the wrist joint was performed on all participants, followed by magnetic resonance imaging within 1 week of ultrasonography. The three main parameters of cross-sectional area measurement, distal nerve flattening, and flexor retinaculum bowing indices showed positive occurrences of 93.7%, 59.4%, and 59.4%, respectively; 90.6% of patients had decreased nerve echotexture. The diagnostic ability of magnetic resonance imaging was decreased when cross-sectional area measurements were used: positive results were achieved in 81.2% of patients, but the positive results showing the distal tunnel nerve increased flattening and bowed flexor retinaculum slightly decreased to 56.2% for each. A high T2 signal of the median nerve was observed in 90.6% of patients. In an agreement analysis, we found a statistically significant difference that supported the use of ultrasound as a primary diagnostic modality for carpal tunnel syndrome. However, magnetic resonance imaging improved tissue characterization and was a good diagnostic modality, with a statistically significant difference, for cases of secondary carpal tunnel syndrome, detection of the underlying entrapping cause, and early abnormality detection in the innervated muscle. Our results demonstrate that ultrasound examination can be used as the first imaging modality after physician evaluation, with results comparable to those of electrophysiological studies for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome and determining its cause. Magnetic resonance neurography examination is the second step in detecting secondary causes in cases with suspected early muscle denervation changes that cannot be elicited by ultrasound or in cases with equivocal results.

Gastrointestinal conditions in the multiple sclerosis prodrome.

To investigate gastrointestinal (GI)-related physician visits and drug dispensations in the 5 years preceding a first recorded demyelinating event or multiple sclerosis (MS) onset. Using linked administrative and clinical data from British Columbia (1996-2013), Canada, we identified an administrative cohort via a validated algorithm (n = 6863), a clinical cohort diagnosed at a MS clinic (n = 966), and matched controls (administrative cohort: n = 31,865; clinical cohort: n = 4534). In each cohort, the 5 years before a first demyelinating event or MS symptom onset (i.e., index date) were examined. We compared rates of GI-related physician visits and risk of ≥1 GI-related dispensation between MS cases and controls using negative binomial and robust Poisson models. Sex differences were tested using interaction terms. The administrative cohort MS cases had higher rates of physician visits related to gastritis and duodenitis (adjusted rate/risk ratio (aRR):1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.83) and diseases of the esophagus (aRR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06-2.02) prior to the index date. MS cases also had greater risk of at least one dispensation for several drug classes, including constipation-related (aRR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.50-2.22), antiemetics/antinauseants (aRR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.43-1.89), and propulsives (promotility drugs; aRR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.47-1.79). Men had a disproportionally higher relative risk for propulsives than women (aRR: men = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.79-3.00; women = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.36-1.72). Several findings were similar in the smaller clinical cohort though none reached statistical significance. GI-related physician visits and drug dispensations were more common in the 5 years before the first demyelinating event versus matched controls. GI symptoms are a measurable feature of the prodromal or early phase of MS, with a sex difference evident.

The quality of telemedicine consultations for sexually transmitted infections in China.

The burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continues to increase in developing countries like China, but the access to STI care is often limited. The emergence of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine offers unique opportunities for patients to directly access health services when needed. However, the quality of STI care provided by telemedicine platforms remains unknown. After systemically identifying the universe of DTC telemedicine platforms providing on-demand consultations in China in 2019, we evaluated their quality using the method of unannounced standardized patients (SPs). SPs presented routine cases of syphilis and herpes. Of the 110 SP visits conducted, physicians made a correct diagnosis in 44.5% (95% CI: 35.1% to 54.0%) of SP visits, and correctly managed 10.9% (95% CI: 5.0% to 16.8%). Low rates of correct management were primarily attributable to the failure of physicians to refer patients for STI testing. Controlling for other factors, videoconference (vs SMS-based) consultation mode and the availability of public physician ratings were associated with higher-quality care. Our findings suggest a need for further research on the causal determinants of care quality on DTC telemedicine platforms and effective policy approaches to promote their potential to expand access to STI care in developing countries while limiting potential unintended consequences for patients.

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale to Assess Marionette Lines.

A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of marionette lines before and after treatment in clinical studies. To describe the development and validation of a 5-point photonumeric marionette lines scale. The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, and real and morphed subject images for each scale grade. Intrarater and interrater reliability was evaluated in initial scale validation (web-based review) ( N = 51 ) and live-subject validation ( N = 75 ) studies, each completed during 2 sessions. In the initial scale validation study, intrarater agreement for 2 physician raters was near perfect (weighted kappa = 0.92 and 0.94). Interrater agreement was excellent during sessions 1 and 2 (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.95, respectively). In the live-subject validation study, intrarater agreement for 3 physician raters showed a strong correlation (mean weighted kappa = 0.77). Interrater agreement was high during live-subject validation sessions 1 and 2 (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.89 for both sessions). This new marionette lines scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of marionette line severity.

Objective structured assessment of medical students’ technical skills in second-degree perineal laceration repair with sponge model-based training

PurposeIn this cohort study, we used a sponge simulator to train students in second-degree perineal laceration repair. We examined whether the training course improved the students’ skills, as measured with an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and by a senior physician. We also examined the correlation between these ratings to assess the validity of OSATS application in this context.MethodsBetween April and July 2022, 40 medical students took part in gynecological/obstetrics training that included a lecture about perineal trauma and the viewing of a video that demonstrated second-degree perineal laceration repair using a sponge model. They then underwent initial evaluation by a senior physician and OSATS application, yielding two independent scores. After training with the sponge model, a second evaluation was performed. The OSATS assessed practical skills (8 items) and suture results (2 items). The senior physician assigned ratings on a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor).ResultsTraining with the sponge simulator significantly increased students’ OSATS (practical skills, p < 0.001; suture results, p < 0.05) and senior physician (p < 0.001) ratings. The OSATS and senior physician ratings correlated strongly (Spearman’s r: first assessment, – 0.72; second assessment, – 0.74; p < 0.01).ConclusionThe sponge-based training improves students’ skills for the repair of a second-degree perineal laceration. The OSATS for the sponge model might be a valid option to examine medical students in an obstetrical course.

Mind the gap: Concordance between perceptions regarding vaccination as declared by patients and their evaluation by their general practitioner

BackgroundThe high level of vaccine hesitancy reported in the French population may lead general practitioners to anticipate difficult discussions on this topic. We aimed to assess the extent to which general practitioners’ evaluation of their patients’ vaccine hesitancy was correlated with the real vaccine hesitancy expressed by these patients. MethodsThe study was based on two brief paper questionnaires completed in private by the general practitioner and the patient at the beginning of a medical appointment: one for the physician to evaluate on three quantitative and non-graduated visual scales (then analysed as a 0–100 scale) their patients’ perceptions regarding vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy and ‘being in favour of vaccination’; and one for the patient to express their perceptions for the same three axes using the same scales. ResultsOverall, 31 physicians participated in the study, with 540 physician-patient pairs being included. The physicians’ evaluation of patient perceptions was more positive when the physician was male (vs female), when the patient was male (vs female) and when both were males (vs both females). The median differences (in absolute values) between the physician evaluations and the patient perceptions were between 9 and 11 (on the 0–100 scale) for the three axes (vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy and ‘being in favour’). A correlation was observed between the physicians’ evaluation and the patients’ declaration (Kendall test: vaccine efficacy: tau = 0.199, p < 0.001; vaccine safety: tau = 0.234, p < 0.001; being in favour of vaccination: tau = 0.365, p < 0.001). Physicians correctly classified 83.4 % of the patients with high perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy (>75/100 for both scales) but only 54.5 % of those with low perceptions (<75/100 for both scales). ConclusionPhysicians tend to correctly identify patients with the most favourable perceptions about vaccination but not those with the least favourable perceptions.

Evaluation of physicians prescribing of COVID-19 guideline–directed outpatient treatments in a primary care walk-in clinic

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory virus that has afflicted millions of individuals in the United States. A few medications have been determined to be beneficial for outpatient treatment. The medications in use against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting during the study period are nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, and bebtelovimab. Proper assessment and treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting is critical to reducing rates of disease progression and hospitalization. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of the prescribing by internal medicine physicians for mild-to-moderate Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guideline–directed COVID-19 outpatient treatment options. MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review examining the outpatient treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 by internal medicine physicians between February 2022 and August 2022. Patients were eligible if they were 18 years or older, had a positive home or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, completed a telehealth visit within 7 days of the positive test, and were prescribed either nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, or bebtelovimab for COVID-19 treatment. The primary end point was the appropriateness of COVID-19 treatment in the outpatient setting based on NIH guidelines, patient characteristics, and prescribing information for the medications. The secondary end point was hospitalization within 30 days of initiation of outpatient COVID-19 treatment. The presence or absence of a clinical pharmacist consultation at the time of prescribing was recorded as a process measure. ResultsA total of 376 encounters were assessed, of which 226 were included and analyzed. A total of 210 participants (93%) received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. The remaining participants received molnupiravir or bebtelovimab. Overall, guideline-concordant treatment for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 was prescribed for 200 participants (88%). Among patient characteristics, only glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had a statistically significant difference between groups prescribed medication for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Fifty-six participants (25%) received clinical pharmacist consultation. Three participants were hospitalized for COVID-19 within 30 days of receiving an appropriately prescribed medication for treatment. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was the only medication potentially prescribed inappropriately due to lack of being renally dose adjusted and the extensive drug-drug interactions. ConclusionNirmatrelvir-ritonavir was the most prescribed medication for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19, consistent with its position as first-line therapy and widespread accessibility. The study results will inform future educational opportunities, such as in-service presentations and handouts, that may improve the prescribing of outpatient treatment for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 moving forward.

Characterizing Outpatient Classical Hematology Referrals at an Academic Healthcare System

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems and delivery networks are experiencing an overwhelming number of Classical Hematology (CH) referrals. In our network, patients referred for CH consultation are facing increasing wait times and a shortage of available clinicians. In response to these workforce challenges, our institution is collaborating with advanced practice providers (APPs) to evaluate new patients using a tiered system that matches consults with corresponding years of clinical experience. This model is in use at one clinical site but its potential benefit when implemented across the entire network is unknown. To better inform this initiative, we sought to identify the most common diagnoses for outpatient CH referrals, determine the complexity level of these consults, and identify opportunities for alternative patient scheduling workflows. METHODS: A list of all new outpatient CH referrals evaluated in the Yale Smilow Cancer Network in Connecticut from 2019-2021 was compiled. ICD-10 codes assigned from each new patient encounter were combined into general diagnosis categories including iron deficiency anemia, other anemias, and thrombosis. After the 3 most common diagnoses were identified, 30 new patients evaluated in 2021 were randomly selected from each diagnosis group for manual chart review. Manual review focused on the details of each patient case and assigned a diagnosis level (Table 1). Diagnosis levels were matched with APP years of experience, ranging from level 1 (consults that could be evaluated within the first few years of practice) to level 3 (cases requiring more extensive experience or physician evaluation). These levels were predetermined by a committee of senior level CH physicians in the Smilow network. RESULTS: Based on grouped ICD diagnosis codes, the 3 most common CH referrals to our network from 2019-2021 were anemia (excluding iron deficiency, with an average of 22.4% of all new referrals), iron deficiency anemia (21.2%), and thrombosis (13.2%). Combined, these 3 diagnoses accounted for 56.8% of all incoming new referrals. Manual chart review of the anemia group showed that 3 patients had iron deficiency anemia with a diagnosis level of 1. After excluding these 3 patients, 1/27 (3.7%) anemia patients were level 1, 9/27 (33.3%) were level 2, and 17/27 (63.0%) patients were level 3 (Figure 1). In the iron deficiency group, after accounting for the 3 additional patients transferred from the anemia group, 16/33 (48.5%) were level 1, 7/33 (21.2%) were level 2, and 10/33 (30.3%) were level 3. In the thrombosis group, 12/30 (40.0%) patients were level 2, and 18/30 (60.0%) were level 3. 18.9% of all reviewed charts were level 1, 31.1% were level 2, and 50.0% were level 3. CONCLUSIONS: Manual chart review of the most common CH referrals (anemia, iron deficiency anemia, thrombosis) showed heterogeneity in diagnosis level. Thrombosis and anemia (excluding iron deficiency) had a higher proportion of more complex cases. In contrast, iron deficiency anemia contained a substantial number of level 1 cases (approximately 50% of all iron deficiency referrals). At one of our clinical sites, CH trained APPs have been evaluating new consults using the tiered system described within this study. Patients are then seen in follow-up by a collaborating physician. Manual chart review showed that 50% of consults in the 3 most common referral categories were either level 1 or 2, representing a substantial patient population that could be evaluated by an APP for initial consultation. In addition to increasing trainee and physician recruitment, implementing this model on a network-wide scale may be an invaluable strategy to address the current CH workforce shortage. Our study also identified that iron deficiency contained a large proportion of level 1 cases. This may be a consult population that is particularly amenable to non-traditional triage and evaluation algorithms. Strategies to consider include eConsultations to facilitate faster evaluation and iron infusions when indicated, or specialized provider and clinic creation. Our institution is piloting the use of triage algorithms to identify these uncomplicated iron deficiency cases and further optimize consult workflows.

2572. Adherence to Evidence-based Guidelines for the Management of Pneumonia in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Abstract Background Abstract: Background Adherence to therapeutic guidelines is crucial when treating pneumonia, as it reduces mortality rate, length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic therapy. However, the high non-adherence rate to treatment guidelines, in general, and Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, are still reported globally. According to our knowledge, no existing data is available regarding the rate of physicians' adherence to the IDSA guidelines for managing pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we aim to assess the adherence rate and the clinical outcomes among patients treated according to the IDSA guidelines, in a tertiary care center in Riyadh. Methods Methods A single-centered, retrospective observational study was conducted at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All data were extracted from the hospital's electronic information system, known as Esihi. Adult patients (≥18 years old) who have been diagnosed and treated in the hospital for community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, or ventilator-associated pneumonia from Nov 2019 to Nov 2021 were included. Results A total of 148 patients were included in this study, with an average age of 65 ± 20 years. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. The data showed that only 74 (50%) were treated according to the guidelines' recommendations, while the other 74 (50%) were not. The former group had a statistically higher cure rate and lower mortality compared to the latter (95% vs. 84%; p = 0.034) and (5% vs. 14%; p = 0.022), respectively (Figure 1). Nevertheless, patients who were treated according to the guidelines had a higher CURB-64 score for pneumonia severity and Average Calculated Charlson comorbidity index than patients who were treated irrespectively of the guidelines (1.86 vs 1.39) and (4.62 vs 3.28), respectively, yet, no statistically significant difference was observed (Table 1 and 2). Demographics and Clinical outcomes of included patients n=148 Conclusion Conclusion Non-adherence to the evidence-based guidelines has been observed in 50% of patients treated for pneumonia. In addition, higher clinically cure rate, shorter length of stay and lower mortality rate have been observed in patients who were treated based on the evidence-based guidelines. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

689. Significant Improvement in Hand Hygiene Compliance and Decline in Clostridioides difficile Infections with Implementation of Infection Prevention Interventions

Abstract Background Per CDC, C. difficile is an urgent microbial threat. Despite use of CDC diagnostic criteria, 2-step testing protocol and antimicrobial stewardship interventions limiting broad spectrum antimicrobial use, we witnessed an increase in infections in 2022, therefore, additional interventions were implemented. Methods A multifaceted QI intervention program to improve IPC (infection prevention and control) practices was implemented in July 2022 at a 160-bed tertiary care center serving the tristate area of Iowa, South Dakota and Nebraska. Interventions included: auditing and real time observations for health care personnel (HCP) hand hygiene compliance; monitoring soap/sanitizer usage; educational interventions including posters posted throughout the hospital emphasizing hand hygiene, “A clean in and clean out” approach and contact precautions reminders posted in patient rooms/nursing stations, weekly nursing huddles focused on nursing and ancillary staff education, provider counseling and continued coaching. Pre-intervention period (P1: 1/10/2021- 6/30/2022) was compared with Intervention period (P2: 07/01/2022-3/31/2023) for hand hygiene compliance and C. difficile infection rates. Results Overall adequate hand hygiene compliance rates for all health care personnel (HCP) increased from 71% during P1 to 85% during P2 (P&amp;lt; 0.05). All categories of HCP showed a significant improvement in hand hygiene compliance from P1 to P2, with rates for physicians increasing from 74% to 92% (p&amp;lt; 0.05), nurses from 68% to 94% (p&amp;lt; 0.001); nurse practitioners/physician assistants from 75% to 90% (p&amp;lt; 0.05), ancillary staff (chaplain, medical technicians, social workers) from 60% to 89% (p&amp;lt; 0.01)]. Hand hygiene product use increased significantly and soap usage alone increased from 45% to 75% in P2 (p&amp;lt; 0.05). C. difficile infections declined significantly from a mean of 1.9 infections per 1000 patient days during P1 to 0.5 infections per 1000 patient days during P2 (p&amp;lt; 0.001); SIR (Standardized infection ratio) decreased from 1.14 during P1 to 0.4 during P2 (p&amp;lt; 0.01). No C. difficile related mortality was observed. Conclusion With implementation of multifaceted IPC interventions, significantly improved hand hygiene rates and a significant decline in C. difficile infections were observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Artificial Intelligence–Aided Selection of Needle Pathways: Proof-of-Concept in Percutaneous Lung Biopsies

PurposeTo evaluate the concordance between lung biopsy puncture pathways determined by artificial intelligence (AI) and those determined by expert physicians. Materials and MethodsAn AI algorithm was created to choose optimal lung biopsy pathways based on segmented thoracic anatomy and emphysema in volumetric lung computed tomography (CT) scans combined with rules derived from the medical literature. The algorithm was validated using pathways generated from CT scans of randomly selected patients (n = 48) who had received percutaneous lung biopsies and had noncontrast CT scans of 1.25-mm thickness available in picture archiving and communication system (PACS) (n = 28, mean age, 68.4 years ± 9.2; 12 women, 16 men). The algorithm generated 5 potential pathways per scan, including the computer-selected best pathway and 4 random pathways (n = 140). Four experienced physicians rated each pathway on a 1–5 scale, where scores of 1–3 were considered safe and 4–5 were considered unsafe. Concordance between computer and physician ratings was assessed using Cohen’s κ. ResultsThe algorithm ratings were statistically equivalent to the physician ratings (safe vs unsafe: κ¯=0.73; ordinal scale: κ¯=0.62). The computer and physician ratings were identical in 57.9% (81/140) of cases and differed by a median of 0 points. All least-cost “best” pathways generated by the algorithm were considered safe by both computer and physicians (28/28) and were judged by physicians to be ideal or near ideal. ConclusionsAI-generated lung biopsy puncture paths were concordant with expert physician reviewers and considered safe. A prospective comparison between computer- and physician-selected puncture paths appears indicated in addition to expansion to other anatomic locations and procedures.

Urology Match: Important Factors Women Consider When Choosing a Residency Training Program

ObjectiveTo determine factors that women urology resident physicians rate as most influential when selecting residency programs. MethodsSurveys were emailed to female urology residents during the 2021-2022 academic year. Residents scored 19 factors influencing residency program choice from 1 “least” to 5 “most” important and ranked their top five most influential factors. Data was analyzed via descriptive statistics and quantile regression. ResultsOne hundred thirty-six (37%) of 367 female urology residents who received the survey participated. 82% percent had no children and 57% did not plan to have children during residency.The three highest scoring factors derived from Likert scale ratings were: resident camaraderie (4.6 ± 0.5 [mean ± SD]), resident happiness (4.6 ± 0.6), and case variety/number (4.4 ± 0.8). As a whole, the lowest scoring characteristics were attitudes toward maternity leave (2.6 ± 1.2) and maternity leave policies (2.5 ± 1.2).Married residents were more likely than those who were single and engaged/in a committed relationship to rank attitudes and policies towards maternity leave as more important (3 vs. 2 vs. 2, p < 0.0001). Residents with children were more likely than those without children to rank maternity leave policies as more important (3 vs. 2, p < 0.0001). ConclusionsAs a whole, women urology residents prioritized non-gender-related factors. However, gender-specific factors were rated highly by married residents and those with children or planning to have children. Urology training programs may use these results to highlight desirable characteristics to aid recruitment of female residents.

Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study.

As advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) continue, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for generating medical information. Their rapid adaptation and potential benefits in health care require rigorous assessment in terms of the quality, accuracy, and safety of the generated information across diverse medical specialties. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of 4 prominent LLMs, namely, Claude-instant-v1.0, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Command-xlarge-nightly, and Bloomz, in generating medical content spanning the clinical specialties of ophthalmology, orthopedics, and dermatology. Three domain-specific physicians evaluated the AI-generated therapeutic recommendations for a diverse set of 60 diseases. The evaluation criteria involved the mDISCERN score, correctness, and potential harmfulness of the recommendations. ANOVA and pairwise t tests were used to explore discrepancies in content quality and safety across models and specialties. Additionally, using the capabilities of OpenAI's most advanced model, GPT-4, an automated evaluation of each model's responses to the diseases was performed using the same criteria and compared to the physicians' assessments through Pearson correlation analysis. Claude-instant-v1.0 emerged with the highest mean mDISCERN score (3.35, 95% CI 3.23-3.46). In contrast, Bloomz lagged with the lowest score (1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10). Our analysis revealed significant differences among the models in terms of quality (P<.001). Evaluating their reliability, the models displayed strong contrasts in their falseness ratings, with variations both across models (P<.001) and specialties (P<.001). Distinct error patterns emerged, such as confusing diagnoses; providing vague, ambiguous advice; or omitting critical treatments, such as antibiotics for infectious diseases. Regarding potential harm, GPT-3.5-Turbo was found to be the safest, with the lowest harmfulness rating. All models lagged in detailing the risks associated with treatment procedures, explaining the effects of therapies on quality of life, and offering additional sources of information. Pearson correlation analysis underscored a substantial alignment between physician assessments and GPT-4's evaluations across all established criteria (P<.01). This study, while comprehensive, was limited by the involvement of a select number of specialties and physician evaluators. The straightforward prompting strategy ("How to treat…") and the assessment benchmarks, initially conceptualized for human-authored content, might have potential gaps in capturing the nuances of AI-driven information. The LLMs evaluated showed a notable capability in generating valuable medical content; however, evident lapses in content quality and potential harm signal the need for further refinements. Given the dynamic landscape of LLMs, this study's findings emphasize the need for regular and methodical assessments, oversight, and fine-tuning of these AI tools to ensure they produce consistently trustworthy and clinically safe medical advice. Notably, the introduction of an auto-evaluation mechanism using GPT-4, as detailed in this study, provides a scalable, transferable method for domain-agnostic evaluations, extending beyond therapy recommendation assessments.

Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations

Abstract Background The quality of services in the health care system is very important for both patients’ health and health care providers. In the past decade, good service ratings from the patient's perspective have become crucial in evaluating the work of medical professionals and health care institutions. However, it is also important to consider the opinions of health care specialists, especially when it comes to medical consultation, which is one of the most important components of primary health care (PHC) chain. Aim To evaluate the attitude of family physicians (FP) towards consultations provided in PHC. Methods The study was conducted in 2022. December - 2023 in February. The research contingent is FP of Lithuania. Research method - quantitative momentary research, anonymous questionnaire survey, 206 subjects were interviewed. Calculated chi-square (χ2) and z-criterion. Results The majority of FP indicated that they involve the patient in the decision-making process (68.0%), those working in private institutions said so more often than those working in public institutions (p &amp;lt; 0.05). 89.3% of the subjects stated that the consultation time with the patient is not enough, and 70.4% respondents receive many unregistered patient visits per day. E-health makes it difficult for 81.1%, 86.4% of the respondents indicated that there is too much of a workload and this was mostly said by respondents working in public institutions (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Remote consultations facilitate the workflow (76.2%). The older age of the respondents and greater work experience lead to lower self-confidence during remote consultation, longer consultation time and less belief in the benefits of remote consultation (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusions Most FP positively evaluate the consultation they provide, but they also said that the consultation time is insufficient, they must consult a number of unregistered patients, e-health complicates the work. Remote consultations facilitate the workflow. Key messages • The consultation time is insufficient. • Remote consultations facilitate the workflow.

Evaluation of physicians' current practices and awareness regarding the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: results of a provincial survey.

International guidelines now recommend nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis. We assessed physicians' current management strategies for uncomplicated diverticulitis, their awareness of the updated recommendations, and barriers to practice change. A 21-question web-based survey conducted between 09/2022 and 11/2022 was sent to participants through their respective Quebec provincial associations or working groups. Participants included general surgeons, emergency physicians, gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Physicians who did not treat diverticulitis were excluded. The main outcomes were awareness of guideline recommendations on uncomplicated diverticulitis treatment, the use of nonantibiotic management for uncomplicated diverticulitis and identification of perceived barriers to practice change. The participation rate was 15.9%. The 465 participants consisted primarily of general practitioners (41.7%), general surgeons (29.2%) and emergency physicians (17.8%). Eighty-two percent had heard of the nonantibiotic treatment strategy for uncomplicated diverticulitis; 7.5% were "uncomfortable" and 44.6% "somewhat uncomfortable" with this practice. A third (31.8%) of all physicians had no knowledge of the updated guidelines on uncomplicated diverticulitis treatment. Most reported "never" (41.6%) or "rarely" (25.1%) omitting antibiotics for uncomplicated diverticulitis. When informed about nonantibiotic treatment, 28.7% and 51.4% of all physicians, respectively, indicated that this "will" change or "may" change their practice. Common perceived barriers to nonantibiotic treatment were concerns about treatment failure (69.6%), unawareness of updated recommendations (67.0%), difficulty in ensuring proper follow-up (59.0%) and workplace culture (54.9%). Physicians' awareness of practice guidelines recommending nonantibiotic treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis and their application are suboptimal. Knowledge transfer activities, educational interventions and optimization of local protocols are needed to ensure the rational use of antibiotics.

Comparative Study of Radial and Median Nerve Blocks with Hematoma Block under Ultrasound Guide in Distal Radius Fracture Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common upper extremity fractures, and their incidence continues to increase due to an aging population and an increase in osteoporosis. Various methods of analgesia for distal radius fractures have been described-including hematoma blocks and nerve blocks. Hematoma blocks are a simple and effective method of providing analgesia; nonetheless, their efficacy may be limited in some cases. On the other hand, nerve blocks provide more targeted analgesia and may be more effective in reducing pain during fracture reduction. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of radial and median nerve blocks with hematoma blocks under ultrasound guidance in treating distal radius fractures. Also, this study aimed to compare the analgesia of radial and median nerve blocks with hematoma blocks under ultrasound guidance to reduce distal radius fractures. In this prospective trial, patients with distal radius fractures referring to 2 academic centers were placed into 2 randomized groups, including hematoma block, and radial median block, both of which were ultrasound-guided. The patient's pain levels were measured and recorded based on the visual analog scale before the block, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the block, at the start of reduction, during reduction, and 5, 10, and 15 minutes after reduction. Patient satisfaction and physician satisfaction rates were assessed, and side effects were also observed for 1 week. Quantitative variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation, and number and frequency percentages were reported for qualitative variables. The Student t test and the chi-square test were used on a case-by-case basis. The significance level was set at P ˂ 0.05. In this study, 120 patients were included. The groups had no significant differences in pain reduction during the procedure. Analgesic medication was needed during the procedure for 17 patients; nerve blocks were applied for 6 patients, and hematoma blocks for 11 patients, which was statistically significant (P = 0.041). Satisfaction rates for patients and physicians performing the procedure were significantly higher in the nerve block group than in the hematoma block group ( P = 0.001; P ˂ 0.001, respectively). The results of this study suggest that ultrasound-guided radial and median nerve blocks can be used as alternative methods of analgesia with other techniques in the reduction of distal radius fractures in emergency departments.

Agreement between physician- and patient-reported Canadian cardiovascular society scores among patients undergoing elective coronary angiography-The CATS study.

The primary aim of revascularization in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is symptom relief. The severity of symptoms is usually evaluated by the physician, not by the patient. We examined the agreement between physician- and patient-reported Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) scores among patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography in a cross-sectional study. Patients (n = 650) and cardiologists evaluated the severity of angina symptoms by filling the CCS questionnaire before coronary angiography. Patients were divided into those without CAD (stenosis diameter <50%, n = 445) and those with CAD (stenosis diameter >50%, n = 205). CAD patients were further divided into three groups according to disease severity (single-, double- or triple-vessel disease). The mean age of the patients was 67.6 (9.9) years and 50.6% were women. In 51.8% (95% CI 44.5%-59.0%) of patients with CAD and 51.9% (95% CI 47.0%-56.8%) of those without, physician- and patient reported CCS scores agreed. The physician reported better CCS scores in 33.9% (95% CI 27.6%-40.7%) of patients with CAD and 36.2% (95% CI 31.8%-41.0%) of patients without CAD. The proportions of full or partial agreement between physician- and patient reported CCS scores were similar across the CAD severity groups. To summarize, we observed a significant discrepancy between the physician- and patient-reported symptom severity in patients with or without CAD scheduled for angiography. The physician underestimated the symptoms in third of the cases. Thus, patient-reported symptom severity, rather than physician's evaluation, should be the cornerstone of treatment decisions.

Race and Ethnicity and Primary Language in Emergency Department Triage

Emergency department (ED) triage substantially affects how long patients wait for care but triage scoring relies on few objective criteria. Prior studies suggest that Black and Hispanic patients receive unequal triage scores, paralleled by disparities in the depth of physician evaluations. To examine whether racial disparities in triage scores and physician evaluations are present across a multicenter network of academic and community hospitals and evaluate whether patients who do not speak English face similar disparities. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study examining adults presenting between February 28, 2019, and January 1, 2023, across the Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, encompassing 7 EDs: 2 urban academic hospitals and 5 community hospitals. Analysis included all patients presenting with 1 of 5 common chief symptoms. Emergency department nurse-led triage and physician evaluation. Average Triage Emergency Severity Index [ESI] score and average visit work relative value units [wRVUs] were compared across symptoms and between individual minority racial and ethnic groups and White patients. There were 249 829 visits (149 861 female [60%], American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%, Asian 3.3%, Black 11.8%, Hispanic 18.8%, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander <0.1%, White 60.8%, and patients identifying as Other race or ethnicity 5.1%). Median age was 48 (IQR, 29-66) years. White patients had more acute ESI scores than Hispanic or Other patients across all symptoms (eg, chest pain: Hispanic, 2.68 [95% CI, 2.67-2.69]; White, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.55-2.56]; Other, 2.66 [95% CI, 2.64-2.68]; P < .001) and Black patients across most symptoms (nausea/vomiting: Black, 2.97 [95% CI, 2.96-2.99]; White: 2.90 [95% CI, 2.89-2.91]; P < .001). These differences were reversed for wRVUs (chest pain: Black, 4.32 [95% CI, 4.25-4.39]; Hispanic, 4.13 [95% CI, 4.08-4.18]; White 3.55 [95% CI, 3.52-3.58]; Other 3.96 [95% CI, 3.84-4.08]; P < .001). Similar patterns were seen for patients whose primary language was not English. In this cross-sectional study, patients who identified as Black, Hispanic, and Other race and ethnicity were assigned less acute ESI scores than their White peers despite having received more involved physician workups, suggesting some degree of mistriage. Clinical decision support systems might reduce these disparities but would require careful calibration to avoid replicating bias.